Gravitas: Russia receives new SU-34 fighter-bomber jets

  Рет қаралды 161,851

WION

WION

Жыл бұрын

Russia has received a batch of 'unique' SU-34 fighter-bomber jets. The jets are a major part of Russia's strike power. Why does Russia rely on the SU-34? Molly Gambhir brings you a report.
#gravitas #russia #su34jets
About Channel:
WION The World is One News examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim is to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to world politics. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalized united world. So for us, the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs and personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: / wionews
Twitter: / wionews
Follow us on Google News for the latest updates
Zee News:- bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Business:- bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps: bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps

Пікірлер: 402
@henthust9784
@henthust9784 Жыл бұрын
The title sentence is misleading. Russia recently use Su 27 more than Su34. The fact is, they have specific fighter jet for each job. Example, the Sukhoi 27 for guarding air space and bombers, and the Mig 31 to carry and launch the Kinzhal. So there is a reason they want to deploy the Su 34s.
@mythoughts5615
@mythoughts5615 Жыл бұрын
SU-27 is the only Russian fighter aircraft with a positive air to air kill ratio 😂😂😂 For perspective, US F-15 104-0
@ramdev9578
@ramdev9578 Жыл бұрын
@@mythoughts5615 F15 was tested against very mediocre opposition 50 (fifty) years ago. Iraq and Libya are not really testing grounds. The F22 is a dud and the F35 hasn't got off the drawing board. Research a bit instead of wallowing in American greatness. They swindled you of trillions and the US / NATO is an impotent army staffed by vaccinated LGBTQs.
@crevis12
@crevis12 Жыл бұрын
@@mythoughts5615 you take a modern airforce like US and constantly attack poor countries with rusty arms.. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yugoslavia.. and on and on.. your point is flawed
@RCLepcha
@RCLepcha Жыл бұрын
MiG 31K launches the Kinzhal and the MiG 31BM launches long range air to air missiles like the R37M and plays an interceptor role.
@rinato7757
@rinato7757 Жыл бұрын
What are the functions of S400 and S500 in Russia military? Military expert
@jakobcarlsen6968
@jakobcarlsen6968 Жыл бұрын
You can put all the systems in the world in an aircraft, but it will ultimately come down to the crew and their training.
@henryairconcepts2999
@henryairconcepts2999 Жыл бұрын
I'm expecting they'll be piloted by conscripts with 10hrs flying experience 😂
@mazspeed003
@mazspeed003 Жыл бұрын
Unless its a USAF UFO??😊
@mazspeed003
@mazspeed003 Жыл бұрын
​@@henryairconcepts2999 the US trainers said a group had done 8 months training , all had passed an were deemed competent to fly F16s
@rajlowkie6616
@rajlowkie6616 Жыл бұрын
When even the BLIND knows where it is.
@backseatsamurai
@backseatsamurai Жыл бұрын
And being Russia, they will have the best of both!!
@suntzu-
@suntzu- Жыл бұрын
at least su34 is combat tested, unlike the f35 that have many problems and crashes.
@FDT000
@FDT000 Жыл бұрын
Where are you getting your information on the back of your cereal box?😂
@Noodleanrgry
@Noodleanrgry Жыл бұрын
su- 34 lost 21 Aiicraft during the year in fllight due to crashes 18 proven crashes and 3 who never was explained how the crashed. F-35 lost 7 confirmed and 1 not known
@2greenify
@2greenify Жыл бұрын
😂Russian lie about everything😂.
@Psk36y
@Psk36y Жыл бұрын
@@FDT000 every year 2-3 fighter jets losses are happening in Japanese sea shore
@Storm-zr5qw
@Storm-zr5qw Жыл бұрын
F22 only known kill is a balloon 😂😂
@matiasd.c9949
@matiasd.c9949 Жыл бұрын
SU34 has been doing a formidable job with guided bombs but the media will always concentrate on the one miss
@HK-ce2lj
@HK-ce2lj Жыл бұрын
Actually all Russian jets are missing in the front lines, they can only fly and fire within the Russian border otherwise it will be shot down by Ukrainian stinger missiles. The US does not allow Ukraine to fire the US weapons inside Russia lucky for Putin unless the US changes its mind then Russia is doomed
@HK-ce2lj
@HK-ce2lj Жыл бұрын
Wion should also report the SU34''s brought down by Ukrainians
@justaguy-69
@justaguy-69 Жыл бұрын
why are they going to blow up the foreign affairs building in moscow? its just offices right?
@jasonaiken2
@jasonaiken2 Жыл бұрын
Oh come on you say will it fail in some attacks. That’s like saying the car may not handle the best in all situations. What was your point here.
@MarcS152
@MarcS152 Жыл бұрын
Another important benefit. Spare parts are in big numbers the same for other jets like Su-27 and Su-35.
@znet2723
@znet2723 Жыл бұрын
With all the destroyed aircraft there are plenty of spare parts in the junk yards.
@crevis12
@crevis12 Жыл бұрын
@@znet2723NATO schill
@anirbanghosh7987
@anirbanghosh7987 Жыл бұрын
+ also you can use F-35 and F-22 all you want but then one has to raise debt ceiling every week. so cost
@donbabilio8298
@donbabilio8298 Жыл бұрын
Old tech. 30 years behind modern western tech
@znet2723
@znet2723 Жыл бұрын
@@crevis12 Yah lol
@JG-kv6pg
@JG-kv6pg Жыл бұрын
In Ukraine's fight, the world finds inspiration, for the triumph of justice is a victory shared by us all.
@mazspeed003
@mazspeed003 Жыл бұрын
The su34 is a big jet so can carry larger payloads or bombs maybe hypersonics its a 4th gen jet so has pretty modern avionics an a bit more stealthy but still a juicy target for any Ukranian sam site
@Zetler
@Zetler Жыл бұрын
LMAO. There isn't a single hypersonic fighter in the entire world. The one that do exists are America top secret spy plane.
@nicandrotorreon4034
@nicandrotorreon4034 Жыл бұрын
The accuracy using unguided bomb is depending on the pilot on how he master his plane.
@Zetler
@Zetler Жыл бұрын
Its a Russian pilot. So its useless.
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
I hope he won't be the one that keeps dropping bombs on Belgorod.
@malualdeng5153
@malualdeng5153 Жыл бұрын
@@Zetler Same thing white people have been saying for Chinese for 100 years now lol
@GwynBleys
@GwynBleys Жыл бұрын
What was the intended target? It was on Russian soil so i doubt they were aiming for the building. And what does delayed detonation mean? What kind of ammo was it? Did your experts say?
@DjDylancalisto
@DjDylancalisto Жыл бұрын
That was like a warning
@myopinion7533
@myopinion7533 Жыл бұрын
When Russia fails there is always 1000 excuses .
@Middle-Eastt
@Middle-Eastt Жыл бұрын
@@myopinion7533 and when USA failed, millions of excuses and blame others
@myopinion7533
@myopinion7533 Жыл бұрын
@@Middle-Eastt well get ready to blame China now for ur problems . My guess is ur gonna cry all ur life blaming others.
@MrDomingo55
@MrDomingo55 6 ай бұрын
Delayed detonation is employed when the aircraft delivering explosives flies very low to ground. If a bomb is dropped and it explodes on contact with ground, its possible that fragments may strike aircraft that delivered the bomb. Having a delay fuse means that bomb will explode after some suitable pre-determined delay, by which time danger to aircraft is not there.
@tangobayus
@tangobayus Жыл бұрын
Google BARD: su-34 vs f-16 The Sukhoi Su-34 Fullback and the Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon are both fourth-generation multirole fighter aircraft. They are both highly maneuverable and capable of carrying a wide range of weapons. However, there are some key differences between the two aircraft. The Su-34 is a larger and heavier aircraft than the F-16. It has a longer range and can carry more weapons. It also has a more advanced radar system. However, the Su-34 is also more expensive and less maneuverable than the F-16. The F-16 is a smaller and lighter aircraft than the Su-34. It has a shorter range and can carry fewer weapons. It also has a less advanced radar system. However, the F-16 is also more maneuverable and less expensive than the Su-34. Here is a table that compares the two aircraft in more detail: | Feature | Su-34 | F-16 | |---|---|---| | Crew | 2 | 1 | | Maximum speed | Mach 2.25 | Mach 2.0 | | Range | 2,400 miles | 1,500 miles | | Service ceiling | 50,000 feet | 40,000 feet | | Wingspan | 57 feet | 40 feet | | Length | 73 feet | 56 feet | | Weight | 60,000 pounds | 30,000 pounds | | Price | $40 million | $15 million | | Radar | Phazotron Zhuk-ME | AN/APG-66(V)12 | | Weapons | Up to 12,000 pounds of weapons, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-surface missiles, and bombs | Up to 6,000 pounds of weapons, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-surface missiles, and bombs | | Maneuverability | Excellent | Good | | Stealth | None | Some | Ultimately, the best aircraft for a particular mission will depend on the specific requirements of that mission. The Su-34 is a better choice for missions that require long range, heavy firepower, and advanced radar. The F-16 is a better choice for missions that require high maneuverability and low cost.
@laudreport3798
@laudreport3798 Жыл бұрын
“Is the Su-34 a Jack of all trades or a master of none?” 😅😹🤣… 🙊
@c0nstantin86
@c0nstantin86 Жыл бұрын
Su-25 for close air support. If it works, don't change it!
@LeslieWood-qb8do
@LeslieWood-qb8do 9 ай бұрын
Let hope for the best.
@Red.bulldozer3
@Red.bulldozer3 Жыл бұрын
While Russia depend on latest SU 34, indians depend on ancient MIG21😂
@diogenes64
@diogenes64 5 ай бұрын
I think they just lost three SU-34s.
@KSmithwick1989
@KSmithwick1989 4 ай бұрын
​@@SubhanAllahi_Wabihamdihi I late, but sure I second their opinion .
@Middle-Eastt
@Middle-Eastt Жыл бұрын
SU34 didn't missed a target, it was a warning drop to get civilians out before major attack.
@satelitinternet6449
@satelitinternet6449 7 ай бұрын
Thank you to much!!!
@ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754
@ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754 Жыл бұрын
Su34 was designed for long range and comfort (onboard toilet), recent foto no toilet? Pilots can stretch and exercise inside cockpit while on mission, so quite a different story. As for effectiveness of sorties, you are comparing to western machines
@baantawai
@baantawai Жыл бұрын
"Is the fighter bomber a Jack of all trades and a master of none" lol
@brianlowe3529
@brianlowe3529 Жыл бұрын
Like the f16s
@dave_sic1365
@dave_sic1365 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like a Russian version of our tornado fighterbombers we have in Germany. Tornado is gigantic compared to our other jets and they are not stealthy, that's why they train super low flight to avoid radars. They get sometimes down to 100m at near sonic speed. I live in the training area for them.
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
At least the Tornado can do vertical take off and landing. I mean, it's a strange war made with old scraps, we could throw in even those Tornados, Typhoons, Eurofighters... It's not like they are worth much nowadays that we have F35 and stealth bombers.
@sparehead8911
@sparehead8911 Жыл бұрын
@@eaman11 tornado cannot do vertical take off and landing. That’s Harrier.
@Roboprogs
@Roboprogs Жыл бұрын
The Russian plane looks like a cross between a US F-111 and F-15. The F-111 had a similar role.
@indianarchangel
@indianarchangel Жыл бұрын
It's called the fearsome "Hell Duck" ❤
@apamadi7148
@apamadi7148 Жыл бұрын
WION also lost the way....become braised News same as America news midea 😢😢
@zawilliams6734
@zawilliams6734 Жыл бұрын
Ever since palka left they haven’t been the same
@aldoconciso
@aldoconciso Жыл бұрын
Guess you mean 'biased' and 'media'. Just don't trust any particular media if you don't want your opinion to be biased
@edwardwongiii2229
@edwardwongiii2229 Жыл бұрын
Same as CRUX. They start the video providing some factual information, but towards the second half, they put in their negative spin. Very sneaky of them.
@yosisesoana1134
@yosisesoana1134 Жыл бұрын
Received su34 from where ?you guys !
@FDT000
@FDT000 Жыл бұрын
Those jets will look nice decorated on the ground after the crash.😂😂😂
@fresh6993
@fresh6993 Жыл бұрын
Beauty and the beast in one package..Slava
@sabprogroup8623
@sabprogroup8623 Жыл бұрын
what about the Tjias?
@krisvanderhoeven8614
@krisvanderhoeven8614 Жыл бұрын
And they tend to crash 😂😂😂😂 called death coffins..
@jvjd
@jvjd Жыл бұрын
Better than all the Ukrainian aircrafts , arsenal and vehicles put together , they don't exist anymore hence they have to beg to the west for imported stuff but that would be against your narrative wouldn't it ??
@reginaldlagrone5082
@reginaldlagrone5082 Жыл бұрын
The SU-34 is a good choice for the war in Ukraine, for short to medium range missions.
@rajlowkie6616
@rajlowkie6616 Жыл бұрын
& A good chance to be down in the first mission.
@fungames24
@fungames24 Жыл бұрын
How did india news know what the target is? Did it get this info from the military experts at the CNN?
@richiexp2
@richiexp2 Жыл бұрын
I call it Donald Duck 🦆, because of it's duck face.
@biomechanique6874
@biomechanique6874 Ай бұрын
Yes, it is nicknamed the duckling as well as the fullback
@thomas_m3092
@thomas_m3092 Жыл бұрын
It might be a great plane. Maybe the problem is the pilots.
@XpVersusVista
@XpVersusVista Жыл бұрын
it's neither. The biggest issue is/was maintenance. Imagine someone gives you 100 million to keep 20 planes in tact, but you know nobody controls whether you're doing your job or not. So you'll take 20mil, and only give the other 80 mil to the people below you to do the job. But they know also that nobody controls, so they also take a bit. This goes on, and in the end there's not enough money to buy all the replacement parts necessary, meaning the plane doesn't work correctly. India uses russian planes and maintains them correctly, and they've shown what russian planes are capable in global competitions. But russia doesn't take nearly as good care of their planes as india does.
@temidayojaphet2901
@temidayojaphet2901 Жыл бұрын
@@XpVersusVista 😂
@edwardwongiii2229
@edwardwongiii2229 Жыл бұрын
@@XpVersusVista I don't totally buy that reasoning, but if there is indeed a difference between nations as to how well they maintain their combat aircraft, then China would beat them both (India and Russia).
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
Well you can't have good pilots if you can't afford the training
@gale8225
@gale8225 9 ай бұрын
Beautyfull plane!💪😃👍
@ropersonline
@ropersonline Жыл бұрын
This report omits the one important news item that would be important to the story: How many SU-34s were or are being delivered on what timeline?
@aldoconciso
@aldoconciso Жыл бұрын
leave that to spies
@ionzaharia9446
@ionzaharia9446 Жыл бұрын
They received 80 new su-34 in November 2022 among with few su -35 and reportedly 6 new su-57 aircraft from the sukhoi birou , although many of these belong to other countries that have ordered them like India, China and others
@Anonymices343
@Anonymices343 Жыл бұрын
Im sure you will not get a true answer on here
@uchennaeze5368
@uchennaeze5368 Жыл бұрын
@@ionzaharia9446 received it from where i thought they produce
@irishgamer8412
@irishgamer8412 Жыл бұрын
Aww my ears lol that whistle was wearing eir phones
@asamanthinketh2024
@asamanthinketh2024 Жыл бұрын
Its a scary weapon...unless your in a F35.
@valmp3
@valmp3 Жыл бұрын
F35 have no chances
@user-fn9if9vi9w
@user-fn9if9vi9w Жыл бұрын
@@valmp3 it doesn’t need one
@user-xm2ev7ql8x
@user-xm2ev7ql8x Жыл бұрын
USA said it's like fighting a civilian aircraft
@johnm7267
@johnm7267 Жыл бұрын
Because they are reliable??
@heklik
@heklik 6 ай бұрын
Like it looks
@lluneytune
@lluneytune Жыл бұрын
Target practice for us Patriot missles😅
@pax4music286
@pax4music286 Жыл бұрын
I don't care about the news, I just want to see Molly
@havachat9927
@havachat9927 Жыл бұрын
Derrrr....obviously it's because the jet is great at barrel rolls. Didn't you notice that in the vid.
@aman_s47
@aman_s47 Жыл бұрын
It's called hell duck, it looks so cute from front
@abissuminvocat
@abissuminvocat 5 ай бұрын
Because 3 FAB-1500s with a planning and correction module with a flight range of more than 50 km leave three lunar craters from any enemy unit.
@Rocky-life518
@Rocky-life518 Жыл бұрын
Regardless how good is the jet fighter it come down destroying enemy air defenses.
@benbo7042
@benbo7042 Жыл бұрын
You should be asking why does the US rely on over 20 nations to help them fight? Why cant rhey go solo if they are tough as they made the world to believe?
@Peter-jj9bs
@Peter-jj9bs Жыл бұрын
Who gave them the aircraft? You should be informative enough
@980ssbbearcat2
@980ssbbearcat2 Жыл бұрын
Please cover the India deadly train crash, the death toll is 300 and counting, it happened on June 03 2023.
@dawood2u
@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
It is a sitting duck for the F-16 that Ukraine is receiving.
@marlmyster
@marlmyster Жыл бұрын
You aren't aware of quite a few facts... Russia can bomb anywhere in Ukraine... Ukraine was only given 3 Patriot Defense Systems and they are all installed among civilian infrastructure... S-400's will be enough for F-16's
@stefanr.823
@stefanr.823 Жыл бұрын
​@@marlmyster "installed among civilian infrastructure", do you see it? Ukrainians need to protect their civilians, something the Russians don't need to. Wonder why that is?
@edwardwongiii2229
@edwardwongiii2229 Жыл бұрын
Even older MiG-29s are more formidable than the F-16. It won't make any difference in the war since Russia has a much more powerful airforce and Ukraine has pretty much lost this conflict contrary to Western media's narrative.
@sabprogroup8623
@sabprogroup8623 Жыл бұрын
it all depends, in some situation, volume could be more important than quality. look at how important artillery in Russia Ukraine war, quantity matters ? its difficult to get high quantity with super expensive gear.
@gameover0102
@gameover0102 Жыл бұрын
Now ukraine will come out and say we just destroyed 100 su 34 using patriot system. Like always and people will believe it 😂😂😂😂
@user-ig4il3qu7o
@user-ig4il3qu7o Жыл бұрын
West give ukrainian the F-16 now
@benanders4412
@benanders4412 Жыл бұрын
And then what? It takes 6 months to learn the basics, it takes about 2 years to become a fully trained F-16 pilot. I'm sure they have secretly been training pilots for months already. But they will be mediocre pilots at best. F-16's are a long term investment. It will only pay off in about 2 years. And only if they send large numbers of them in combination with other planes. The F-16 is a great plane, but it's most effective in combination with other platforms. They normally don't operate on their own. This means you also need radar planes like AWAX, and planes for electronic jamming. Sending F-16 in small numbers on their own doesn't make much of a difference. And they probably wont survive long if they don't complete a 2 year training.
@stupidburp
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
Not great, not terrible. Su-34 are an Su-27 derivative focused on ground attack that has side by side seating. Developed from Su-27 trainers. They are more modern than most the Soviet era bombers in Russian service but are still lacking in many aspects compared to Western aircraft. Many of these are being shot down in Ukraine because they are more useful than ancient Soviet aircraft but don’t have sufficient stealth, electronic warfare capabilities, or other self protection measures to fly safely at high or low altitudes.
@ALLAHISENOUGHFORPALASTINE
@ALLAHISENOUGHFORPALASTINE 11 ай бұрын
They will adapt it us new thing
@hashimoto942
@hashimoto942 Жыл бұрын
Such a gorgeous fighter jets ✈️ it’s like an 19 year old model 😅😅 I love it ❤
@AstonBoxx
@AstonBoxx Жыл бұрын
It's a 4th gen aircraft bro, it's not all that great tbh
@Avarnus
@Avarnus Жыл бұрын
Where is su-57? Did Tom Cruise destroy all of them in Top Gun movie 😅?
@brienrobinson6061
@brienrobinson6061 Жыл бұрын
Can someone break through with a peaceful deal people are dying we are humans..
@robertoaseremo4163
@robertoaseremo4163 Жыл бұрын
How can they say that SU34 Fighterbomber can operate so accurate while numbers of these SU34 Fighterbomber have been shoot down by the Ukraine MANPADs
@georgenzioki
@georgenzioki Жыл бұрын
Just try to match Us caps
@rrasic
@rrasic 6 ай бұрын
Россия наверное сама в шоке, что у нее есть в орсанале утки и гуси
@TigerUppercut.00
@TigerUppercut.00 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter what planes Russia are getting.. Ukraine is getting F-16's.. 😁😁
@benanders4412
@benanders4412 Жыл бұрын
And then what? It takes 6 months to learn the basics, it takes about 2 years to become a fully trained F-16 pilot. I'm sure they have secretly been training pilots for months already. But they will be mediocre pilots at best. F-16's are a long term investment. It will only pay off in about 2 years. And only if they send large numbers of them in combination with other planes. The F-16 is a great plane, but it's most effective in combination with other platforms. They normally don't operate on their own. This means you also need radar planes like AWAX, and planes for electronic jamming. Sending F-16 in small numbers on their own doesn't make much of a difference. And they probably wont survive long if they don't complete a 2 year training.
@TigerUppercut.00
@TigerUppercut.00 Жыл бұрын
@@benanders4412.. blah blah blah.. Ukrainians are smart.. and they learned fast.. once they mastered the F-16's.. your Russian comrades will be instant fertilizers once they entered Ukraine..
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
@@benanders4412 UAF already has combat pilots, they only have to learn the F16 they are already combat pilots.
@toddbrackett4277
@toddbrackett4277 5 ай бұрын
They just learned not to operate theses within Ukrainian airspace.
@ashokagarwal78
@ashokagarwal78 Жыл бұрын
No nation is dependent on just one type of aircraft .. Russia is manufacturer of arms and ammunition and weapons and space technology
@dypolesolutions3970
@dypolesolutions3970 Жыл бұрын
Received from who?
@andyzagray7962
@andyzagray7962 8 ай бұрын
Its a luxury sports car
@ronaldsegage5621
@ronaldsegage5621 Жыл бұрын
It is also a magnet of missiles from the patriot antiaircraft systems, hence it can't Ukraine airspace.
@beegonee
@beegonee Жыл бұрын
Why..cuz they cant use f16..😂
@melvendenore1743
@melvendenore1743 Жыл бұрын
Advance in number to F16
@lostinsamoa
@lostinsamoa Жыл бұрын
F16s have no chance against these
@michaelbougoure
@michaelbougoure Жыл бұрын
Wow with a jet like this they must have crushed Ukraine already.
@phoenixrivenus9270
@phoenixrivenus9270 5 ай бұрын
I bet those are some sweet sweater kittens!
@robertoaseremo4163
@robertoaseremo4163 Жыл бұрын
These Russia SU34 Fighterbomber is not new anymore it is just a upgrade the system recieved by Moscow
@neiltitmus9744
@neiltitmus9744 Жыл бұрын
Because they are back of the que for f35s
@MichaelSmith-os1pp
@MichaelSmith-os1pp Жыл бұрын
Such a gorgeous anchor
@HighSideHustler81
@HighSideHustler81 7 ай бұрын
If a jet came to dog fight could the su34 jus dump his bomb load and then be able to fight with missiles and be lighter and more efficient compared to other fighters?
@tipoomaster
@tipoomaster Жыл бұрын
Notably their super duper really fifth gen stealth Su-57 is completely missing from the conflict, the one they tried to sell India
@HK-ce2lj
@HK-ce2lj Жыл бұрын
Actually all Russian jets are missing in the front lines, they can only fly and fire within the Russian border otherwise it will be shot down by Ukrainian stinger missiles
@GautamAxom5291
@GautamAxom5291 Жыл бұрын
These are only limited number, Do you know that su57 is first fifth generation jet achived kill record. Nor a f22 and f35
@HK-ce2lj
@HK-ce2lj Жыл бұрын
@@GautamAxom5291 a squadron of F22's are in Poland in case Putin goes wild. These handful of F22's are just enough to decimate the whole Putin army and hang Putin and his collaborators
@Konstantin910
@Konstantin910 Жыл бұрын
@@HK-ce2lj да хер тебе
@Anonymices343
@Anonymices343 Жыл бұрын
They haven't started yet. 😮😮
@ChristianThePagan
@ChristianThePagan Жыл бұрын
Who does air strikes like that in this day and age? Those guys were lucky, one Shilka or a couple of Ukranian conscripts with Stingers would have easily ended their flying careers.
@charleso6316
@charleso6316 Жыл бұрын
It has the capability to fire long range missiles from outside Ukrainian airspace which is an advantage
@justaguy-69
@justaguy-69 Жыл бұрын
the next target is the foreign affairs building in moscow, why? its just offices right?
@ChristianThePagan
@ChristianThePagan Жыл бұрын
@@charleso6316 Then they should use them. Tactics like this are a waste of both pilots and Su-34s.
@ericmcnellis1190
@ericmcnellis1190 Жыл бұрын
Why you ask... cause their poor😅
@georgenzioki
@georgenzioki Жыл бұрын
Just arm them with air to air
@bonito34
@bonito34 Жыл бұрын
Because they have no better
@codeforce5556
@codeforce5556 Жыл бұрын
Fighter jets from wish😂😂
@BalagonCryptonite__
@BalagonCryptonite__ Жыл бұрын
Flying Dumptruck!
@jeffreytinosan1935
@jeffreytinosan1935 Жыл бұрын
Target shooting of F16 😂😢😢😢
@VitalityMassage
@VitalityMassage Жыл бұрын
Judging from Russia's superior intelligence, I'm sure these are really great jets.
@TigerUppercut.00
@TigerUppercut.00 Жыл бұрын
LOL.. 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂.. crazy Russian Troll.. it is obvious that you just came out of your cave after all these months of hibernation.. you have missed out on a lot of things.. 😂😂🤣🤣
@HK-ce2lj
@HK-ce2lj Жыл бұрын
Actually all Russian jets are missing in the front lines, they can only fly and fire within the Russian border otherwise it will be shot down by Ukrainian stinger missiles
@aldoconciso
@aldoconciso Жыл бұрын
most intelligent people cannot make a paper plane properly. Btw, i'd say all states are inherently stupid
@rajlowkie6616
@rajlowkie6616 Жыл бұрын
Great for the scrapyard.
@seadfacic2924
@seadfacic2924 Жыл бұрын
Because it's a great jet with enormous radar capabilities.
@josue_kay
@josue_kay Жыл бұрын
One can safely assume Russia has been on target more often than not, looking at the bombed out state of Ukraine.
@RamBo-yh3kz
@RamBo-yh3kz Жыл бұрын
Russia's weapons manufactored for 60 years now almost gone.
@4_vaccuum_salesman_of_marr944
@4_vaccuum_salesman_of_marr944 Жыл бұрын
This literally makes no sense.
@user-pp8jv6oy2s
@user-pp8jv6oy2s 5 ай бұрын
Ils ont pas besoin de surveillé la défense aérienne Ukrainienne , leurs propre défense en a descendu 2 aujourd’hui , pour le guidage de précision ils en ont pas besoin pour tirée sur les civils
@Longix69
@Longix69 Жыл бұрын
Ukraine become a testing ground for Russian weapon. So many room for improvement because its actual testing during war. Same as testing their cruise missiles in actual combat.
@rajlowkie6616
@rajlowkie6616 Жыл бұрын
Build more decoys of building & bridges
@moussa8512
@moussa8512 Жыл бұрын
What happened to F16s 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
nothing, they are not even there yet...
@tommygibs1381
@tommygibs1381 Жыл бұрын
It can be too good to keep getting shot down
@aarons2632
@aarons2632 Жыл бұрын
Where did they come from is what I’m wondering? If the Russians didn’t manufacture these then I’m curious who the ally is the is having their back.
@LeslieWood-qb8do
@LeslieWood-qb8do 9 ай бұрын
They are too many problems in the world.
@darkmoon7406
@darkmoon7406 Жыл бұрын
Even India fighter jet can not defeat F-16 and jas 39
@reypettis2407
@reypettis2407 Жыл бұрын
What difference does range make when it will be shot down down if it approaches Ukraine? Places of this type have been shot down in Ukraine even before more sophisticated Western AA systems arrived in Ukraine.
@SteveWard151
@SteveWard151 Жыл бұрын
Just 2 of them? Gonna laugh when they get shot down
@eaman11
@eaman11 Жыл бұрын
I bet that they will only fly over Belgorod, it's one months that russian pilots inadvertently drop bombs over there!
@2greenify
@2greenify Жыл бұрын
Russia using older and older stuff. Russia wil soon use paper planes to .
@jeromepacheco6005
@jeromepacheco6005 Жыл бұрын
Less expensive each fighter if ever getting shutdown by the Ukrainians, heavy bomber is very expensive per flight plus the escort
@johncheresna
@johncheresna Жыл бұрын
A Mega Million dollar jets, to drop dumb bombs by dumb pilots. They make for nice targets as well.
@sewrajawmee874
@sewrajawmee874 Жыл бұрын
1 Thessalonians 5 3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. 4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
@paulinelambert7780
@paulinelambert7780 Жыл бұрын
why make it a fighter-bomber jet? why not make jets that specialize on only one thing? a super light super maneuverable fighter jet or a heavy mega bomber jet. if this new SU-34 meet another enemy fighter like the new F-16 variant or the Raptor, it's gonna lose the fight. what's the point?
@pauljs75
@pauljs75 Жыл бұрын
Who knows? The closest equivalent Western aircraft was probably the F-111, but that went into retirement for the reasons you've stated. (And it's role split between F-15 or B-1 depending on the mission.)
5 Deadliest Russian Fighter Jets That Can Destroy Anything
12:03
TTI English - Technology
Рет қаралды 686 М.
Sigma Girl Education #sigma #viral #comedy
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН
ХОТЯ БЫ КИНОДА 2 - официальный фильм
1:35:34
ХОТЯ БЫ В КИНО
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Когда на улице Маябрь 😈 #марьяна #шортс
00:17
Performance Test: The All-New 2025 Land Rover Defender
4:11
US Car Reviews
Рет қаралды 4,4 М.
Советский мультфильм про нашу жизнь !
13:49
Дедушка Аргентинца
Рет қаралды 430 М.
Какой смысл худеть к лету? / Редакция
49:15
Редакция
Рет қаралды 733 М.
Couture to the Max  fashion show mp4 1
5:03
Emily Snell
Рет қаралды 4,6 М.
Top 10 Best Fighter Jets in the World 2024
12:25
Military TV
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
F35 vs SU35 - which would win?
10:02
Grid 88
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
Белоусов рассказал о провальной атаке ВСУ на Крымский мост
9:06
Sigma Girl Education #sigma #viral #comedy
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН