I read this case 10 times and still didn't understand it. After a three minute video, I finally do, thank you!
@prissdiaz19854 жыл бұрын
Same here so much better explanation.
@DungHoang-un7dt3 жыл бұрын
I am a law student from Vietnam. Thank you so much.
@andycrowder8009 жыл бұрын
This helped me a lot for an undergrad course, thanks for posting. At 0:44 the video depicts the nephew as William Story III, but many other sources (including the Quimbee brief for the case) identify him as William Story II. Minor discrepancy, just thought I'd point it out.
@mehmetg.51467 жыл бұрын
As a student which studying in the way of the civil law but also taking a lesson about common law, i find this video very useful. Thanks
@MerilynSweet2 жыл бұрын
I love the analysis! Simple but well articulated hitting all the points!
@richardnopedji85077 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your good works Quimbee. Keep up the good work.
@yay0kondarah7 жыл бұрын
YOU HELPED ME SO MUCH THANK YOU!!!
@aimeelu73263 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for posting this video and making it easy to comprehend.
@samizhr9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this beautiful explanation.
@deedeeliu08297 жыл бұрын
Really easy to understand, thank you
@Miquelladawnllc6 жыл бұрын
We love these videos !!!!!!!! You have all done a fine job to help educate us coherently and properly .
@boblove8225 жыл бұрын
Studying for a Law final. Very helpful video thank you for making
@nicksantos22105 жыл бұрын
they had snapbacks in 1890?
@sarweenabdulla62433 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot 🙏 and it is so helpful ☺
@niket5277 жыл бұрын
Why does the nephew look like Justin Bieber?
@LatinoHeAt6620118 жыл бұрын
Hamer's argument is valid. How come the higher courts refused it? What's the reason? They all seem to agree on the sufficiency of consideration.
@pehzhav9 жыл бұрын
doesn't this case contradict one of your contracts videos, where a promise was made by a father to his daughter but couldn't be enforced.
@Arthud27 жыл бұрын
That probably was a case related with the "promise to give a gift" (which is not enforceable).