Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Finnish Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LqM_radviiktE2tjOqLHw-B Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Sea videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lr1-xIzFrM6xUHCOgetdkmp
@randyross56303 жыл бұрын
I subscribed and will Give You a Try! But you Play Up Chi-na! And I'll be Seeing you!
@williamjpellas03143 жыл бұрын
These are very capable small surface combatants. Other than having to downsize the main gun from 57 mm to 40 mm, they are quite well armed given their small size. I assume the use of aluminum and composite materials is what has served to keep the displacement so low, because otherwise these vessels look like small corvettes to my eyes, rather than "missile boats". Well done, Finland!
@amigo78352 жыл бұрын
Greetings from Sweden my allied friend. Together we defeat the invaders!
@Castragroup6 ай бұрын
Inly invaders are the colored people
@Jrhoney3 ай бұрын
Welcome to the party, pals!
@pjotrboboy9002 жыл бұрын
This is a superiour information package. I even dare to say as a Finn, that this is all in all the best production out there on the Hamina class - added value is delivered with a solid introduction on Finnish Navy heritage. Well done!
@David-dl3vj2 жыл бұрын
Shit; It is saving pukin millions. Just put it all out there. I'm SURE you are going to scare a PHSYCHOPATH into sanity 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@UnclePutte3 жыл бұрын
Good explanation, but it requires one detail - the addition of pictures of the Archipelago Sea and other Finnish coastal sea routes. They are an unique enviroment for naval hide-and-seek, with roughly 50% more islands than the entire Canadian northern seacoast condensed into a vastly smaller area. Give it a google to understand better, everyone - or better yet, take a sailing vacation there, it is quite beautiful.
@drewblackmatter66693 жыл бұрын
Type WOTER KILLZONE AIGEAN TEREN A2AD PERFECT PLAYS
@nzxt12342 жыл бұрын
yeah same as the swedish coast lots of tiny islands on the baltic coast also lots of places for submarines and ships to hide
@frigginFin2 жыл бұрын
@@nzxt1234 Some submarines might even decide to run aground in those waters. Anyone remember 1981? It was funny... 😁
@nzxt12342 жыл бұрын
@@frigginFin Yeah that was funny XD well you know how easy it it is to" missnavigate " and get stuck nere a swedish naval base ;). and diesel sub that gives out radiation humm.
@bholdr----010 ай бұрын
Well put... That would have made the vid a bit more impactful. It is good in general, though... Cheers!
@ed209nl3 жыл бұрын
I love how well-rounded your video's are: history, politics, geography, competitors, specs, upgrades, purpose and vulnerabilities al rolled into one structured story. Keep up the good work!
@devlin75752 жыл бұрын
Well said
@David-dl3vj2 жыл бұрын
Yeah Pukin loves it too.
@herptek Жыл бұрын
@@David-dl3vj Care to explain?
@vonjopetit39572 жыл бұрын
It was a honour service my country in Navy one of those.
@DannyHeywood3 жыл бұрын
I love the Cammo Patterns and how it fits perfectly with the rocky/hilly coast-line.
@informationcollectionpost32573 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a good boat to defend small countries in a limited budget. Very versital but not a large expensive boat to operate. Could make a good export product. Excellent video on the background politics, geography, etc.
@duhni45513 жыл бұрын
It is small for a purpose, it can move in river systems too.
@herptek Жыл бұрын
@@duhni4551 It is needlesly big for a missile boat, but since it has to deal with AA and anti-submarine duties as well as to contribute to minelaying I guess that is what you get. Not exactly every river out there would be traversable by this boat.
@duhni4551 Жыл бұрын
@@herptek It can move in pretty damn low waters, it has 1,7m draft. Given it is bit longish but not that wide, it can move more than easily in most of the main rivers here and in Russian rivers in the regions it would have to patrol in case of war (and everything would go as planned) =D
@herptek Жыл бұрын
@@duhni4551 Well, the scale of operations just escalated quickly. As much as like to entertain some revisionist claims over Russia, the first priority of our missile boats my not be some special defensive mission in the large river systems of our "near abroad". Don't get me wrong, naturally Finland needs fleets on the Ladoga and the Onega once Karelia is liberated, if not for practical military necessity then at least as a matter of prestige. We have to assert our dominance! In our last war we actually had a minisubmarine specially designed so that it could be taken apart and transported from the Baltic Sea into Lake Ladoga to operate there but this was never to be. I have to appreciate the foresight of it, however. In all seriousness any of our own river systems are dammed for energy production and the rest are not traversable by something like warships going out of the few main spesifically built channels meant to allow vessels to transit between bodies of water. I'm not sure how big a boat would fit those, however.
@benktlofgren4710 Жыл бұрын
You do not need bigger ships than corvettes in the Baltic archipelago. Small deadly fast and nimble wins over big and clumsy all day. And that does not mention you can get more corvettes for the same cash over frigates or bigger classes.
@mechantl0up3 жыл бұрын
There are more island in the Finnish territorial waters than in any other territorial water area in the world, so there is very little space to maneuvre large vessels aggressively, especially outside well-known maritime lines because the waters are also very shallow. The large number of small islands also means radar detection of surface targets is very difficult, so big and powerful radars are of little use. Nimbleness, rather, is the key.
@lzh49503 жыл бұрын
S Korea's coastline is also similarly fronted by many small islands too I think
@sauliviitanen33922 жыл бұрын
@@lzh4950 Yes South Korea has about 3800 islands on the coasts as Finland has about 50000 islands on the coastal areas.
@herptek2 жыл бұрын
@@sauliviitanen3392 When Åland is counted in the archipelago is quite extensive.
@petrusinvictus360310 ай бұрын
This is Brown waters, Thinking when USS Ronald Reagan with its fleet turning at Suomenlahti: Blue Waters. Today White waters.
@Homoprimatesapiens3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate this channel with honest straight forward info about military equipment and explanations where they fit into the military or navy or airforce scenario. As for the Hamina class missile boat this is very well designed for the purpose it had to fulfill. Bravo.
@Ethnarches3 жыл бұрын
Cool to see something from my home country on this channel, thanks for making this! I'm sure this has been requested, but it would be cool to see a video on the CV90 from you, since I served as a commander on one of those in the Finnish Defence Forces. Great channel overall, thank you!
@jonnyrawket81583 жыл бұрын
I've actually been reading about this ship recently so it's awesome to see this video.
@duhni45513 жыл бұрын
Finland is bringing out 4 new ships with similar concept. This time it is Frigate sized Corvette with Destroyers weaponry =D It would be Pohjanmaa Class. Interesting concept, i have to say.
@finntastique38912 жыл бұрын
@@duhni4551 It will basically be a shrunk-down Arleigh Burke class destroyer. Pretty harcore!
@eyesofisabelofficial3 жыл бұрын
I was surprised by how versatile this small vessel is in comparison with those in service with it's Scandinavian neighbours. looking forward to a video on the larger corvettes planed in the near future.
@duhni45513 жыл бұрын
They should be out pretty soon already, actually in the coming year. Pohjanmaa Class would be the name.
@koldaussie3 жыл бұрын
That was super informative! I liked how you combined a wide range of information about its capabilities as part of a network, and between the coastal batteries, aircraft, other missile boats and larger ships, I can see these boats being quite a nightmare if used in hunting packs. Again, thanks for a very interesting video. First time here, got a new subscriber here on my first video.
@mydearcod96392 жыл бұрын
She goes fastern than 30 knots :D I haven't serve on that missileboat, but i serve in rauma-class. And they say same. Well i have been helm of Rauma when it goes fastern than 40. So this newer desing are slower? Ok. Thise are very very fast ships, they can hide on the island of Finland and use those shallow waterways as escape routes or shoot out their missiles. They are sneaky ships :) Perfect for Finnish shores. Few of them can bring down you aircraft carrier, they are that deadly.
@spark300c8 ай бұрын
yep missile boats all about hit and run and thing using cruise missile make easier to do so because it has lunch the missile at the edge of the range of enemy boat and then quickly get out of range of it.
@blessedheavyelements85442 жыл бұрын
Outstanding briefing! Thank you very much and that is an outstanding vessel. Very capable and armed to the teeth! We will need your expertise in the coming war with The Rus. Together we defend each other. Best Regards and Best Wishes! Subscribed
@WeaponDetective2 жыл бұрын
Wellcome
@frankfischer1281 Жыл бұрын
An excellent video. One must also add ‘kudos’ to the Finns in bringing ingenuity and common sense to their national defense paradigm.
@teme823 жыл бұрын
Just to clarify you. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, in 1990 Finland unilaterally canceled the restrictions the treaty had placed on its military. No one objected so all the military clauses were removed...
@Dimetropteryx3 жыл бұрын
Might I add that this was a matter of controversy in Finland, particularly the restrictions on the air force, which were still adhered to until the 2000s.
@teme823 жыл бұрын
@@Dimetropteryx yeah but that was voluntary thing. Getting the missiles weren’t an issue since the military restrictions were cancelled.
@harri98853 жыл бұрын
@@Dimetropteryx Yeah but that's Finnish politics for you, there is always some angry bird. ;)
@sepposavinainen26603 жыл бұрын
Hi I was on Rauma class where it goes way more than 40 knots. So i don't think this Hamina class is goes any less. They are really fast :D
@pistonburner64482 жыл бұрын
Listen Smith Mudbitch (I took the liberty to translate your name), we're living in the year 2000 already, 40 knots is nothing. Anglers ride their small boats at 60 knots+ easily... Norwegians cruise their larger vessels at well over 50 knots (exact speed is classified)
@user-yp5df3nx7d2 жыл бұрын
Where the armies of many countries often exaggerate the performance and quantity of their military equipment, Finland has traditionally done the opposite, so in that light, these probably really reach 35-40 knots.
@ghansu3 жыл бұрын
Pls remember that those told speeds and weapon system ranges are just there about. Trust me that those go way over 30knots. Quite propably you can add over 50km range on those missiles also. I served at Rauma class and point with those are purely to be stealthy platforms to hide behind island and shoot any closing ship. Mostly those are operated without ship using any other sensor but passive ones. Target info comes from somewhere else. Those are covered with camo nets and they have springlers to make their heat signature very low. As its impossible to shoot back through island from sea you have to have very low flying aircraft to sink those sneaky boats and they have aa just for that. Those missiles also have enough range to basicly cover whole finnish gulf, plus they wont ever work alone. Nice video.
@pekonimestari2 жыл бұрын
Good thing you are telling these information to potential enemy..
@Mariini2 жыл бұрын
@@pekonimestari Eiköhän sotilastiedustelulla ole näistä jonkinlainen kuva idässäkin ettei heidän tarvi YT videoiden kommenttikenttiä ja randomien kommentteja käydä tiedustelemassa.
@geoffreyreeks24223 жыл бұрын
My Country (Australia) would be wise to model some of its fleet on this boat, for the same reasons. Regards, Geoff. Reeks
@cesaravegah37873 жыл бұрын
Love aussie people...still can't understand why the blunder of buy the french submarines.
@reksiohundson87063 жыл бұрын
I think Poland would be wise to get 6 such boats , that would make our waters safer . (BTW is funny , but those fast missle boats have bigger fire power that ww2 destroyers , I think they should be called pocket destroyers)
@mayanktripathi87263 жыл бұрын
Respect and support to our Australian brothers from india..but Australia has a very long coastline to defend against a possible Chinese amphibious invasion... So these missile boats would be woefully inadequate in terms of range and capabilities....but yes a scaled up version of this marvel will go a long way
@geoffreyreeks24223 жыл бұрын
@@cesaravegah3787 We has a Prime Minister who is a socialist. So, he was incompetent. The Russians have already hacked the design and we have not even started building the submarines. Australia has been lead very badly for too many years. Our Muslim neighbor Indonesia has stated that is will build nuclear weapons using its five nuclear reactors. Australia is in danger of loosing its country. Regards, Geoff. Reeks
10:36 "In 2018, the restriction for the use of the torpedo was lifted" The Paris peace treaty restrictions on weaponry apart from nuclear weapons were nullified in 1991. Seriously. Am I the only one who knows this? This comes up all the fucking time!
@KoteDarasuum2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, technically Finland could start to build submarines aswell but havent decided on doing that for political reasons.
@zorankalina43992 жыл бұрын
Wise and logical aprouch to build a navy.....considering geografy, money, efficientie, quality...all👍🙂🍀 Thankk you from Cr🌞atia for Patria apc and 2 Helsinki class missile boats.
@MikhaelAhava3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing, I am sure to do further reading of this ship, it looks like a good all rounder for Defence , lacks range and endurance though.
@razor1uk6103 жыл бұрын
For a neutral nation who forces are self-defencive in nature, that is predominantly a coastal vessel, where long range extended deployment endurance is not needed for 95% of envisaged service usage by the Finnish Navy
@SA-xf1eb3 жыл бұрын
Very nice. Surprised there are not more of these around the world.
@duhni45512 жыл бұрын
They are designed for Finnish waters, there aren't similar needs in many places. I guess Asia has few areas where these things would shine.
@joakimwohlfeil Жыл бұрын
Because there is not many waters that demands such focus on littoral capacity. Those ships are perfectly designed for their intended operational areas..
@jerrydc818 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like a great boat to use by the Philippine Navy
@claudiomannoni55572 жыл бұрын
Nice video and great boat the Hamina …
@Joshua_N-A3 жыл бұрын
What the LCS should've been. Isn't that simple? It's modern iteration of the old coastal battleship, often used by countries like Sweden or Finland.
@CorePathway3 жыл бұрын
The US uses its navy to project power, not defend its coast. These don’t have the endurance for our World Police role.
@Joshua_N-A3 жыл бұрын
@@CorePathway heard they're retiring the LCS. What happened? Aren't those supposed to have blue and green water capability?
@Scorpio.19893 жыл бұрын
@@Joshua_N-A The rank and file of the Navy (The actual sailors who operate the ships) don't like them, the sailors actually refer to the LCS (both classes) as Little Crappy Ships. and even the Navy admitted that they're unsurvivable in a real war against a capable enemy...
@Joshua_N-A3 жыл бұрын
@@Scorpio.1989 wasn't both designed to counter missile carrying fast attack crafts?
@Scorpio.19893 жыл бұрын
@@Joshua_N-A No, they were designed to clear mines, escort landing craft near shore, and operate in rivers if needed...
@Kane-ib5sn3 жыл бұрын
pound for pound, the most capable surface warship in the world.
@michalmoder82332 жыл бұрын
youre doing great
@bholdr----010 ай бұрын
Dang... These suckers are armed to the TEETH! With supersonic, 200 km- range anti-ship missles, torpedos (and active sonar!), 57(or 40)mm gun, anti-air missiles, depth charges, sea mines, and a half-dozen .50 cal (12.7 mm, to be fair) machine guns... For littoral work, compare to the LCS (BS) ships that the IS is retiring as soon as they are built... (Yeah, I know the LCS are still being built in order to maintain shipbuilding capacity and skills in the U.S, but it's a bit of a joke when one could get five or (many?) more of these for each one of them! What an interesting design, that checks all the boxes for a modern littoral combat ship, like, say an... LCS? (Well, IF one disregards this ship's endurance issues- no big for Finland in the Baltic, but a 900 knot range is probably not gonna cut it for a global navy.)
@M-I10 ай бұрын
Well even if the LCS is the little crappy ship at least the Constellation-class looks pretty promising. But if Finnish boats are interesting to you you might want to check out the new Pohjanmaa-class of corvettes that he Finnish navy is building currently. Those are, I think, what the LCS should have been
@stevestruthers61803 жыл бұрын
Your video was really well put together and informative. Nice work. I've susbcribed to your channel.
@guyh.45532 жыл бұрын
Very impressive ship! This is a great example of what the US Squids need as part of our navy. But the Admirals, (insert sarcasm here) who of course are smarter than the rest of the world, don't see it that way. Great job Finland 🇫🇮!
@zoolkhan Жыл бұрын
well your squids are sailing around the planet - you dont have a need for tiny missileboats. european countries do not have the same world-police projecting powah ambitions. But finns are known to have participated in operation atalanta (anti-piracy in front of somalia etc) Which cant have been easy for ships designed for coastal-defense in cool climatezones. Probably having no aircon , must have been tough on people used to work in arctic conditions. They lack endurance (fuel/supplies) for such a long distance sail... I was in the navy, and i can tell you on a normal northern european day - the engine room is a friggin sauna already now go to africa, and you will be fried in there.... aircons usually not great I am guessing the american fleet has a much better endurance - and every ship the usn comissiones - must be able to keep up with the rest i.e. a carrier strike group.
@TorToroPorco3 жыл бұрын
The best things about Finland are their rally drivers, hockey players and the indestructible vintage Nokia phones.
@Joshua_N-A3 жыл бұрын
Perkele
@benghazi42163 жыл бұрын
@Norse man Yes exactly. And that is why their rally drivers and hockey players are really something else It all begins with SISU.
@razor1uk6103 жыл бұрын
Jokingly asks a humorously dumb tangential question... (I know the Sisu meant is the Finnish combination of courage, determination, willpower and stoicism/guts etc.) _"By Sisu, do you mean the Finnish manufactured trucks composited together from Isuzu, Iveco & Scania designs & parts?"_
@razor1uk6103 жыл бұрын
@Norse man Yes, I know that, it is pretty much what I said and described it as, and why I Did not describe it by one singular English term which would fail in conveying its implied Suomen keili meaning. Please don't read me as being angry I lived in Finland for 2 years, working in a fabrications factory; ..mä olen idotti Englantilainen, puhun paska Suomeksi keili vai kireja, assun Suomissa 2005 - 2007 Nürmijärvellä.
@renatodemavibas33673 жыл бұрын
I used to buy NOKIA phones only, but now Chinese and Indian made phones dominate our market.
@AngMarinduqueño3 жыл бұрын
Philippines, consider this!
@MikhaelAhava3 жыл бұрын
They’re getting Austal Offshore patrol vessels.
@SergeyPRKL3 жыл бұрын
Finland doesn't sell warstuff to shady countries.
@koff413 жыл бұрын
@@SergeyPRKL Who desides who is shady. There is a country that has killed about 30 million people after 1945 how many of them are children. And this country has been in war 93% when it was founded.
@Joe3pops Жыл бұрын
The Canadian navy can learn alot from the Finns. A larger gun means more effective range means more time to engage multiple incoming targets.
@peterliddle90923 жыл бұрын
The Australian navy and WA shipbuilder, Austal would benefit greatly from teaming up with Finland's Aker Yards Oy.
@thebestofj.fraley3 жыл бұрын
Some have always said, Dynamite sometimes comes in small packages. I like it, I think they would make great bass boats. Drop a bomb in the water, watch all the bass float.
@duhni45513 жыл бұрын
You guys must have massive Bass there =D
@thebestofj.fraley3 жыл бұрын
@@duhni4551I'm in AZ and no, our Bass are average size, but when I lived in TX, they were much larger. Everything in TX is bigger.
@lintu25 Жыл бұрын
They go fast fastern than 30 knokts :D I know cos i was on the pedal.
@sierravortec24943 жыл бұрын
The guy recording the ship at the start of the video must be the guy who always spots big foot and tries getting a recording of him.
@ukkomies1002 жыл бұрын
This ship has terrific firepower for its size
@mangrey23613 жыл бұрын
that boat would be a good fit for my Country: Denmark we have more then 100 islands, and have a small feet, Air force and army
@GermanGreetings2 жыл бұрын
...such a clever propulsion !
@valtterifani3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact. From the radar of a Hamina-class boat, you can also see the port of Tallinn and part of the coastal traffic in the northern part of Estonia from the port of Helsinki. m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/aIvXd6GqotugfdU
@shreyaschatterjee7023 жыл бұрын
Amazing vid
@jeroenharingman95762 жыл бұрын
2:13 "...no offensive weapons, such as..." ... "... mines ..." Mines? How are mines offensive? They're probably the most clearly defensive weapons that exist.... (yes, I know they *can* be deployed offensively)
@WeaponDetective2 жыл бұрын
We love the audience like you, who are of the same mind as us. You answered your question as we would exactly answer. 😊
@ukkomies1002 жыл бұрын
They can be used in blockades. I cant think of any other reason
@turkkak55492 жыл бұрын
Using sea mines to block your shipping lanes so that your neighbour's navy can't easily come and liberate you is clearly offensive
@peterliddle90923 жыл бұрын
The Australian Navy and WA shipbuilder, Austal would benefit greatly by teaming up with Finland and Finnish shipbuilder, Aker Yards Oy.
@herptek3 ай бұрын
Two of the Helsinki-class missile boats mentioned in the recounting of history in this video, now long since withdrawn from Finnish service interestingly ended up in service in the Croatian navy.
@Alocloki-e2g15 сағат бұрын
Seriesly,intro of this chanel is like a horroe movie
@user-xj3ve7wt8k2 жыл бұрын
Cool little ship.
@bernardantoinerouffaer75783 жыл бұрын
Très bien.
@perperson1993 жыл бұрын
Do the Norwegian Skjold Class. A great modern corvette!
@WeaponDetective3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your interest. We add the Skjold-class to our list. We will prepare a video as soon as possible.
@annegrethenythe86263 жыл бұрын
@@WeaponDetective Yes, please!
@ridfersmovies3 жыл бұрын
can you please do a video on the Skjold-class? it looks really interesting to me
@WeaponDetective3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your interest. It is already on our list. We will make a video about the Skjold-class as soon as possible.
@erlandnettum66802 жыл бұрын
I think that the Norwegian Skjold class will likely be more effective in combat due to a more advanced missile. If the Hamina was equipped with Naval Strike Missile it would be a toss up. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skjold-class_corvette en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Strike_Missile
@nimimerkki88282 жыл бұрын
Take a minute and look at the coastal waters and archipelago of Finland on Google Maps. It makes perfect sense why the boat is small and nimble. Also whats not shown on the map is all the millions of rocks hidden just beneath the surface. Large vessels would be basically useless for defense.
@habahan42573 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this excellent video. Please make a video about Turkish Kılıç-class
@WeaponDetective3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your interest. We added the Kilic-class to our list. We will prepare a video as soon as possible.
@habahan42573 жыл бұрын
@@WeaponDetective Thanks
@lloydzufelt7514 Жыл бұрын
Really good show but you have to tell us the cost of the ships
@tripledelight81043 жыл бұрын
1939 winter war with Russia, First Soviet-Finnish war 1941 - 44 Continuation War, Second Soviet-Finnish war The enemy of Finland was Russia in the past and will be in the future.
@lacai5272 жыл бұрын
did know anything about our ships! but Finnish defense strategy would be more or less hide and seek, and our coast have lots of small islands so maneuver big ships around coast would be problematic, so once enemy founds it, it has limited route.
@makegaminggreatagain39072 жыл бұрын
Watching this after having watched the Swedish R-142 Missile boat, and I feel it would be an opportunity wasted for Weapon Detective, to do an "on paper" comparison of the Hamina, R-142, Visby, Sehested P547 and the Skjold Corvette. Ship roles and characteristics, weapons, speeds, propulsion and so on.
@TheArcknight3 жыл бұрын
First thing that came to mind when this starded playing: "I wish this video would finnish already".
@benghazi42163 жыл бұрын
Come on Sweden. Buy this. We lack numbers. Our stealth corvettes are not enough. And then maybe Finland would buy the Gripen, which would be such a great purchase for both countries. The synergy we could have would be immense. We could make it very very costly for Russia to operate in the Baltic then, and secure the Finish supply lines.
@conlari1783 жыл бұрын
Visby class corvettes are way more advanced and also the stealthiest ship ever
@villekinnunen63573 жыл бұрын
@@conlari178 With none anti air capability. That´s shame.
@ghansu3 жыл бұрын
@@conlari178 Stealthiest yes, but lacks firepower and censors against Hamina class.
@joakimwohlfeil Жыл бұрын
@@ghansu I would say the Haminas are beautiful and perfect ships for Finland. I might also sa you likely underestimate what Visby is, and its capacity, even if they have taken a long time to make fully operational (and still has some planned additions coming)...
@sameerthakur7203 жыл бұрын
Finland should design a tank made entirely out of Nokia phones. The only competition would be a Danish tank made entirely out of Lego blocks. Seriously, Nokia and Lego are indestructible. Probably way better than the stupid DU armour on the US M1 Abrams.
@voittoputki65802 жыл бұрын
Imagine if Nokia made tanks and used 3310 technology in them
@neilstern16943 жыл бұрын
Nice
@semco720573 жыл бұрын
That missile boat sounds like it will be great in patrolling rivers and areas of the ocean where they can protect ground and sea forces in case of an attack on the nation.
@conlari1783 жыл бұрын
Hamina is not best at open ocean buy better in coastal areas what it was desinged for
@spark300c8 ай бұрын
I think corvette is smallest blue water warship. they are bigger than missile boats.
@braindisorder50432 жыл бұрын
For those who dont understand why we built smaller boats. We dont even want you to know😅
@normanocampo44662 жыл бұрын
The Hamina Littoral ship is GOOD for the Philippine Navy, alongside with the Shaldag Mk. IV from Israel
@georgesmith81132 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👊
@maxkronader52252 жыл бұрын
Ah, so this is the class McHale and Binghamton were always talking about - it was usually misspelled Humina Humina. 😁
@scottgray39453 жыл бұрын
This how I imagine an Asheville class gunboat would look if it was designed today.
@patsprankcalls3 жыл бұрын
Why does this seem more versatile than a type 45...?
@SergeyPRKL3 жыл бұрын
Well, because it is? Hey, don't worry, it's got finnish Wärtsilä diesels too, so not all is bad ;)
Can it turn into a submarine to perform underwater special operation like Russian cruisers do?
@ukkomies1002 жыл бұрын
If you can find it first
@chandrachurniyogi8394 Жыл бұрын
in the post 2020-21 pandemic era the Finnish Navy could do with a fleet of five brand new Sigma class 5,633 ton (6,905 ton loaded) stealth guided missile multi mission frigate powered by cutting edge iSMARTFuelCell® HYBRId™ marine propulsion system . . . by the way the 8-cell circular VLS in the Hamina class missile craft needs to be replaced with a proper 8-cell A60 SYLVER VLS system . . .
@joakimwohlfeil Жыл бұрын
Hmmm, sorry to say. But a ×5500ton ship would not survive 5 minutes in the Baltic littoral areas. Both Sweden and Finland have consequently moved away from bigger ships for fighting missions (they have bigger support wessels). Even if coming generations might be somewhat larger a 5000+ wessel is just a target....
@wyyrdojim10 ай бұрын
The fact that Sweden and Finland have joined NATO changes the calculus just a bit! It’s good to have friends!🇸🇪🇫🇮🇺🇸💙💛🤍💙❤️🤍💙
@petter57212 жыл бұрын
Bofors 57mm Gun and SAAB RBS15 missiles 👍🏻
@zinoudz12752 жыл бұрын
I need to buy some hamina's plz how much coast's
@antoniomiguelsimao3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations Finland.
@dpf19713 жыл бұрын
I have a question: this ship's design is centered around that massive 57mm mount. It is just plain huge; esp. for such a small caliber gun. My question is this: for the same space (and possibly the same - or near - weight) couldn't you maybe fit the Oto Melara 76mm Strales gun. With the new guided ammunition, it would be much more effective than the dinky 57mm.
@ghansu3 жыл бұрын
Main gun in modern ship is purely for anti missile or anti air roles. 76mm would weight way too much and would be totally useless in our waters.
@kk-gr3ly3 жыл бұрын
Too heavy, like the video mentioned the 57m was changed to the 40mm because of the weight.
@joakimwohlfeil Жыл бұрын
Way to heavy, and actually the 57mkIII with 3P munition brings more effect on target than the 76mm (and as said they still replaced also the 57 with a 40mm because of weight issues, they however used a 3P enabled 40mm version)
@peterkorek-mv6rs Жыл бұрын
Full package for small money. Weapons from Nordern Europe are the best.
@Jon.A.Scholt2 жыл бұрын
And to think, here in the US we wasted billions upon billions building and then immediately decommissioning the LCS, when we could've built something similar, slightly larger, and as capable as this Finnish vessel. Makes me even angrier about how Lockheed scams the taxpayer.
@sirairili15702 жыл бұрын
I think we bought this recently 🇦🇱🇫🇮
@darkknight99243 жыл бұрын
They should build more hamina class
@gonzalovalentinmarincastan142510 ай бұрын
Cuánto sale un barco hamamina de Finlandia y si se puede exporta para mexico
@chandrachurniyogi83943 жыл бұрын
should be re-classified as guided missile fast attack crafts instead of missile boats which is an old WW2 era (1935 - 1996) classification given to small surface combatants having a fully loaded displacement of no more than 650 ton . . .
@circeciernova17123 жыл бұрын
Hamina Hamina Hamina
@petrusinvictus360310 ай бұрын
Thank you. Navy man say...
@drhkatik25422 жыл бұрын
Top Boat patrol Sensor Weapon Weapon Speed
@emregungor29862 жыл бұрын
@spark300c8 ай бұрын
well destroy is mint to be big. A true destroyer is around 3,000 tons. cruisers are 5,000 tons and bigger. the main role of destoryer is take out small ships like missile boats so has be not big in size. most us destroyers are not destroyers but cruisers because they are over 5,000 tons.
@M-I5 ай бұрын
That's just like your opinion, man. Arleigh Burkes are between 8000-9000 tons. Type 45's are over 7000 tons, those being among the best destroyers at the moment. Tico's are over 9000 tons and are cruisers. Your tonnages seem like they're straight from 2. world war era. Besides, tonnage ain't even that useful when thinking about ship classes, most useful is to determine the ships intended use.
@spark300c5 ай бұрын
@@M-I well tonnage does determine the ship intend use. in world war 2 destroyers had different purpose. destroyer main purpose is to take out small torpedo boats in world 2 era. main destroyers are to big to be effect to take small attack craft leaving a hole in us military. also Arleigh burke suck as cruisers. the do not have 6 inch guns for land attack and long range shelling. they lack armor to tank 50 cal machine gun fire. if send enough boat you can shink Arleigh burke with just 50 cal machine guns. with armor you force enemy to use missile or rocket which gan be taken out with anti air systems.
@M-I5 ай бұрын
@@spark300c No modern warship is armoured in the way you mean. Also I'd like to see someone try to take out a US destroyer with a 50cal. The 5' gun, bushmaster and CWIS would have a field day. That reads like an Iranian fever dream to me. Also, Burkes have a huge loadout of cruise missiles, the gun isn't intended for shore bombardment. At the moment the Burkes are the most effective cruisers on the open ocean due to their huge missile magazines and probably the best naval radar atm
@martingilvray063 жыл бұрын
What would Admiral Kanarese say about this .
@a_damska3 жыл бұрын
hamina hamina hamina hamina
@gpatoy59762 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact : Hamina literaly means Defence in Greek language. Hamina =Αμυνα =Defence . with silent h (H)amina . (H)ELLAS=ΕΛΛΑΣ=GREECE
@mini_bunney2 жыл бұрын
that's awesome :D
@Lumperi652 жыл бұрын
He he Hamina is a coast city in Finland
@ukkomies1002 жыл бұрын
What a coincidence. Thats cool
@overworlder3 жыл бұрын
That looks like a frigate missing the back half.
@ericmason3493 жыл бұрын
This sounds like a littoral combat ship. We should have bought some of these instead of building the Independence and Freedom class ships. It seems that the U.S. cannot retire them fast enough.
@rolandsallstrom2 жыл бұрын
USA are doing missions on other continents. Hamina isn't made for open sea. It's only for coastal waters
@blessedheavyelements85442 жыл бұрын
Affirmative :(
@garyliu65893 жыл бұрын
Should focus on the features
@David-dl3vj2 жыл бұрын
Looking ahead 12 months. I bet now they're thinking 'we didn't buy/make enough'.
@duhni45512 жыл бұрын
We have new boats about ready to come in to service, manufacturing began few years ago. We have newer been foolish enough to ignore the needs of our military. Check out our Pohjanmaa Class for example.
@David-dl3vj2 жыл бұрын
@@duhni4551 And more power to you.👍👍
@herptek25 күн бұрын
@@duhni4551We don't exactly have too many surface combatants in our navy. The new corvettes are welcome, but could just as well be armed better for air defence. Rauma-class is tactically as good as any missile boat and is very valuable class as long as it floats. Getting rid of them is not exactly an attractive idea in my opinion. The two Hämeenmaa-class minelayers are also due to be replaced by the same 4 new corvettes, which diminishes the size of our already small coastal fleet more than would be great. 4 less than maximally armed fregate sized multi-purpose corvettes and 4 missile boats doesn't make for a very great fleet of surface combatants. The service life of at least the minelayers could be extented as they have undergone renovation to keep them in service longer than planned anyway due to the delays in the construction of the new corvettes. A pretty good coastal fleet otherwise, but way too small for comfort.
@herptek25 күн бұрын
@@duhni4551 We don't exactly have too many surface combatants in our navy. The new corvettes are welcome, but could just as well be armed better for air defence. Rauma-class is tactically as good as any missile boat and is very valuable class as long as it floats. Getting rid of them is not exactly an attractive idea in my opinion. The two Hämeenmaa-class minelayers are also due to be replaced by the same 4 new corvettes, which diminishes the size of our already small coastal fleet more than would be great. 4 less than maximally armed fregate sized multi-purpose corvettes and 4 missile boats doesn't make for a very great fleet of surface combatants. The service life of at least the minelayers could be extented as they have undergone renovation to keep them in service longer than planned anyway due to the delays in the construction of the new corvettes. A pretty good coastal fleet otherwise, but way too small for comfort.