Hands-On: Glashutte Original SeaQ - Is it worth a Rolex?

[@Sandbag1300]

Got mine at the AD in Blue with a fully brushed bracelet but I wear it on a rubber strap. Finishing is a level above my GMT Master 2. Nothing beats an in-house movement compared to the lack luster quality controls in current ETA movements. Keeps better time in all six positions versus the Master 2. Daily wear for me so no need to wind, ever. Best, not an attention grabber at a distance but up close it is a scene stealer compared directly to a Rolex.

[@francos3469]

That truly domed sapphire crystal gives off an acrylic type distortion look, especially at oblique angles. I need to see this in person.

[@drnick40]

I have that watch and it keeps time within +/-0 sec for the last few months. Unbelievable, isn’t it? The ultimate sleeper timepiece.

[@josevasquez1781]

I own this same watch purchased from Wempe in NY. I simply adore this piece simply because it's a true unique design and extremely well made. I tried on the bigger brother but it wears to big even on my 7 inch wrist, it wasn't huge at all it's that it's tall at 15.5mm. I find that the 39.5mm version is the sweet spot for me.

[@TwentyOne_Five]

39.5mm is a large watch. The 5 digit Subs we’re about that size. I believe the original Subs were more like 38mm.

[@sum11t]

6:45 - 'You know it's coming up don't you?' - Amazing!!

[@BarkandJack]

haha.

[@luizg.6331]

Just bought the SeaQ on a bracelet. Absolutely amazing watch! AD had both black and green dial versions in stock. Both beautiful, but I had to go with the black as it will be my daily wearer. I agree, it could have more power reserve.

[@racebannon3014]

It’s a great timepiece as I acquired this watch a few wks ago. Great addition to my Rolex collection. Only drawback is the power reserve...should be better for the money. Fit & finish is phenomenal however & no regrets

[@dangerpowers5939]

Who Cares about the powerreserve? Are you gonna wear it or look at it?

[@jollyrob]

@@dangerpowers5939 both.....obviously.

[@clontstable1]

Probably a rebranded SW200-1.

[@waterfordrs22]

@@clontstable1no chabce. Given they are a within SWATCH Group, even if it wasn’t their own movement, they’d obviously be age access to ETA.

[@garymelrose9727]

@@clontstable1 - no, you're mistaking them for rolex.

[@watchcollectingstrategy]

Your color grading is on point here mate! I have this one in & you perfectly captured this piece.

[@josevasquez1781]

I own both the Oris 65 2017 in all steel including the bracelet and the Glashutte sea q . Totally different watches from top to bottom. From unscrewing the crown and hacking to setting the time and winding, the GO is amazing. The Oris 65 is a nice watch, especially the 2017 with that translucent dark blue edge on the dial it’s gorgeous indeed. The Sellita SW200-2 on the Oris is okay, the Soprad A10 smokes it escially when winding. I had plenty of time to return my GO back to Wempe and I just could not do it. Amazing watch. I put the GO with my recent JLC Polaris Marine Date. Well, close.

[@entroheat]

One cost 10k and the other max 2k should be huge difference in quality

[@MarcoPescatore]

One of the best watches I own. Such a beauty in green on grey nato strap. Pure understatement and highest level of quality.

[@Daniel1210MKII]

I had the same thoughts when I first tried both models in September. And then bought the Panorama Date with the blue dial.

[@dimasheldian1473]

This looks like Glashutte inspired by what Oris doing with the Divers 65 heritage version

[@rafayz9033]

My money would go to the Oris tbh, your'e getting a rather functional watch (it has an ISO certification which many people don't know) and it has a movement that is easily serviceable. Of course the biggest thing, as Adrian mentioned in the beginning, is the look of the watch: the 12,3,6,9 with the dimensions of a vintage rolex sub on one of the best interpretations of a rivet oyster style bracelet is really hard to compete with. At the end of the day, you just have to go your own way ;)

[@stueyx]

I've got an Oris and tbh the rubber strap looks identical to the Glashutte. Its super comfy btw!

[@hammalamiri12]

No the case has clearly been ripped off from the Seiko 62Mas

[@Billeh556]

R Z the divers sixty five has ISO certification for 100m? Uh no. Link or you’re thinking of another watch, or lying entirely.

[@dimasheldian1473]

@@stueyx I got the 65 heritage in rubber too, can confirm a very comfy rubber indeed!

[@LordHays]

The plug for the B&J Straps is rapidly becoming my favourite part of the review!! Another great video!! :o)

[@John-g1v8s]

Nobody complains about the Rolex not having open case? This watch is a good alternative, getting a great watch, looks good, the bracelet has the easy adjustment, has all the Rolex features. I can’t get the Rolex so forget it, perhaps this will be the one, I am not looking to buy and sell, I want to have a quality watch to wear.

[@John-g1v8s]

This is perhaps the watch to go for, just forget the Rolex, I’m really looking for a good alternative

[@Sandbag1300]

@@John-g1v8s They only produce a few hundred of each version a year. Company produces about 10,000 watches a year. Do not wait too long...Got mine in blue.

[@jb678901]

If I buy another G.O. is will be a lightly used second-hand example, with box/papers. These watches lose about 20-30% off the retail sticker on the second-hand market, then hold value at that point. Same as Grand Seiko.

[@jeanlefranc3817]

The segue into the B&J shop advert is brilliant.

[@BarkandJack]

haha, thanks Herve.

[@PeteMcConvillWatches]

That was kinda fun.

[@cedarcanoe]

The SeaQ is an incredibly beautiful watch

[@jeremycraveiro]

This watch is the perfect size, dial is fantastic and the finishing is incredible. I also prefer solid case backs. If I could complain about anything I guess the depth rating could be a little higher and maybe a higher power reserve at that price point 👍🏼

[@John-g1v8s]

200 Meters is enough for most non divers.

[@jarrahdrum]

I like it 🙂 and I’ve been to Glasshütte and while there I visited the museum. This visit has helped me to appreciate this company and the others that are there.

[@storminmormondd]

I love this style of case. I have the 62mas reissue and it reminds me a lot of it.

[@1018Frankie]

With a longer power reserve and an open case back to see the exquisite movement definitely worth every penny of it! Greetings from Puerto Rico 🇵🇷

[@BarkandJack]

I agree. If they did that, this would be an amazing watch.

[@Bestbudd123]

Rolex had only 48 hours in the Submariner until the new one was released. So no big deal for me.

[@DanteMiami]

I agree that an open case back would help justify the price on this one and the new 39.5mm model with the blue dial and applied numeral (and no fauxtina), which I prefer. In fact, I will likely get that blue dial variant when it’s available on the secondary market for a more reasonable price.

[@Eric_Nielsen]

The new 39.5 in blue is likely my next pickup.

[@BarkandJack]

The blue is such a great blue! The dial is awesome.

[@brysoga]

When I saw it I thought so too.

[@davelee9791]

When you spend that amount of time and love on a movement it needs to be seen..it’s in a different class to the Sub in every way..

[@earlscheib7754]

That amount of time on a movement that is ultimately no better than a 2892 ETA, weak power reserve and conventional balance

[@sidewinderxx]

Stupid comment.. that's like suggesting the artisanship shown on Langes and Pateks is without value just because they have the same accuracy and power reserve of other watches. You're missing the point on purpose

[@danielmiller9012]

@@earlscheib7754 PEASANT

[@leemartin2978]

Beautiful....completely agree about the case back , but it’s a watch I’d love to own . Excellent video

[@TwentyOne_Five]

I love the rubber strap and solid case back.

[@johnnyguitar6697]

I don't quite understand why everybody keeps comparing this watch to a Rolex Submariner when the obvious point of comparison should be a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Also, a dive watch does not need a display back. It's another potential weak point which could compromise the water resistance. Fair point on the 40 hours power reserve, though. I prefer the blue version, as I can do without the fake patina.

[@swissmade1497]

It’s an absolute home run stunner!

[@steelsteez6118]

Is it Brandon? Is it really?

[@enriqueali]

I prefer the blue-dialled version, same size, scheduled to be released later this year. And unlike the similarly priced Submariner, I'm guessing these will be readily available at ADs. Having said that, it's still way out of my budget. So I reckon I'll have to console myself with the Tudor BB58 blue as a more affordable alternative 😟😟😟

[@austinzizzi1142]

I’m deciding between those two but with the black dials

[@glennharris3862]

Great video. You convinced me to buy a SeaQ today. Everything you said is true. I’ll never look back at Rolex again. Thanks!

[@mikec3454]

I can’t help but think of how much more balanced this dual would look without the date. The white date wheel clashes with the faux patina, IMO. Otherwise, I love everything about it. There are plenty of watches though I’d buy before it at that price point.

[@juniorjohnson5961]

It needs exposition case back with the bracelet and the rubber bracelet thrown in that would be a nice package at this price !!

[@johnnyguitar6697]

Please enlighten us as to why a dive watch would need an exposition back, which requires an additional gasket that could potentially fail and ruin the waterproofness.

[@juniorjohnson5961]

@@johnnyguitar6697 How many people actually Dive " Do you" To me this is a dive style !

[@johnnyguitar6697]

@@juniorjohnson5961 Sure. While we're at it, let's buy SUV style cars that are only two wheels drive, because who actually drives off road.

[@Talon173]

Completely agree with your assessment. Problem is for that kind of money you could get a Blancpain fifty fathoms......there’s a lot of competition in that price bracket

[@izaazkhalili]

The size is perfect. If only it comes with 100 hour power reserve & exhibition case back like the SeaQ Panorama Date, I would have gotten this instead.

[@fergthe1st]

Looking forward to getting that grey Nato for my BB58! Cheers Adrian, great video as always.

[@reverb508]

Every time I see this watch, I'm reminded of the Longines Hydroconquest. If I were after that aesthetic, I think I'd pocket the 6k and get the Longines...

[@SJCB27]

reverb508 Me too!

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

Lol funniest comment on KZbin. The GO is in a completely different league to Longines.

[@reverb508]

​@@Jabber-ig3iw How's that funny? I'm not saying the two watches are on par, just that the SeaQ looks like a Hydroconquest aesthetically.

[@ianjones739]

Put everything aside, I really like the watch.

[@hurrelln]

That segue into straps! 👌🏼 golden

[@michellep2682]

Old review but just picked up this watch with the blue dial on the bracelet. Everyone talks about the power reserve but it is about the same as a PP 5711 or 5167 (35-45 hrs) that cost substantially more. I'd love to have a longer power reserve but isn't a deal breaker for me.

[@cedshred1676]

I agree, this watch needs a sapphire caseback. With higher horology the movement is the star and we need to see it. In general, I like GO watches and am happy you’re reviewing them. Would be nice to have a review of the Glacier Blue Sixties. Also, a video about the good, the bad, and the ugly bracelets.

[@AnthonyRichesEmpire]

The last video made me buy the bi-colour, got it for £9200 (list is over £12k). Beautiful looking piece.

[@petershallis2294]

Leave the movement unfinished and knock two grand off the price...sorted.

[@dasmesser1]

Then it would not a Glashütte

[@einundsiebenziger5488]

@@dasmesser1 ... would not what? Be?

[@roepks]

Most accurate watch I've ever owned. It runs on average +/- 0.2 seconds per day. Every day.

[@dariodeagostini]

I appreciate the sincere review. I agree with you. That watch would be interesting at less than half the price

[@waterfordrs22]

Power reserve isn’t something I lose sleep over. In my opinion, 50-70 hours is sufficient. If I need more, the watch isn’t getting enough wrist time. Super long power reserve watches sound great on paper, but to actually get the thing to full reserve is another matter. You either need to wear it daily all day or spend a substantial time winding the watch and at that point, the purpose of the extended PR. becomes self defeating IMO. I have an El Primero with fifty hours PR. For a 5hz movement, that’s pretty good though I wind up winding it regularly- I wear it daily, but not when I’m most active. I’ve got a Railmaster too, that’s worn to work. As I recall, the PR on that watch is accurately reported, but I don’t even remember what the duration is anymore nor do I remember the last time I wound it. All my other watches sit mostly no amount of PR could keep them running. This GO is designed to be a daily wear for certain. Look at the size and proportions it’s about perfect far better for most people relative to the larger GO diver. It’s a true tool watch aesthetic and as such, not having a sapphire caseback is completely en point. The solid caseback likely contributes to the wearability ever so slightly. My El Primero has an exhibition caseback and a nice movement, probably not as visually impressive as this watch, I rarely actually look at it. I probably take it for granted. At the end of the day, this watch makes for a nice complement to the larger edition. Perhaps what I’d like to see in this smaller size is a no date edition. With respect to GO having a dress watch slant. I think they simply lean towards high horology at a reasonable price.

[@cubex68]

Solid caseback or totally fine but at that price they need to pack in the bracelet and the rubber strap

[@SJCB27]

cubex68 Bracelet, rubber strap AND the canvas strap!

[@robertyork7817]

Lucky to see the green in person and was extremely impressed. Wish they'd make a black dial version with the applied numbers and BGW9..the 42mm is just too big for me :( This is real luxury dive watch at its best.

[@alexanderlehmann4653]

"We made it pretty but we don't let you see it."

[@panayiotiskyriacou5118]

an "exquisite" finsh of the movement is not just about looking good.

[@earlscheib7754]

Panerai did something similar...

[@gyang333]

Earl Scheib lol

[@mrk131324]

Finally you are moving into endgame divers. Now the Blancpain and the GS diver, there is nothing I know about after these two.

[@adamethancrow]

Love the channel, try so hard to support you - been to buy straps, leather, NATO on many occasions - you never have a 22mm. In two years I’ve never been able to buy one. I’ll keep checking. 😳

[@BarkandJack]

Lots of 22mm straps coming this week. 👍🏻

[@2Bob_Rocket]

Superb looking watch, but knowing the finishing that Glashutte Original are capable of, it needs a display back. Another great video Adrian 😀👍🏼😎

[@lucemax._6791]

In my opinion this watch is just stunning one of my favourite dive watches

[@donschloth5785]

Adrian, how does the panorama Sea Q wear as a 42mm compared to this Original Sea Q 39.5mm? I’m a 178-180mm wrist size. Thanks.

[@nickturner2813]

What a breath of fresh air watching your channel, none of the pomposity and pretention of that TGV clown.

[@BarkandJack]

Thanks a lot Nick. 🍻

[@Yorkshiremadmick]

For the money it’s available Still a Glasshutte and knocks the sub off the pedestal. I’m contemplating chopping my SD 16600 in and getting the SEAQ Panorama Date

[@matslundgren1632]

The solution would be for it to cost 4700, that would be more reasonable.

[@earlscheib7754]

Because of its great power reserve and free sprung balance?

[@oliverpersson6090]

​@@earlscheib7754 Since when did power reserve equal good movement? You can get a Hamilton Khaki with 80 hours, doesn't mean it's a movement that belongs in anything above a grand. I guess a Hamilton Khaki all of a sudden has an objectively better movement than high horology brands because it has a longer reserve. Logic.

[@davidofglenbrook4487]

If this is such a great movement, why is Glashutte only offering a 2 year warranty? And why is Glashutte afraid to warranty a specific level of timekeeping accuracy on the watch?

[@oliverpersson6090]

@@davidofglenbrook4487 "Looking at Glashütte Original’s quality promise, I can see that it notably exceeds COSC’s chronometer standards in two categories: positions tested and average daily rate." - Hondinkee You're talking out of your a** at this point. www.hodinkee.com/articles/glashutte-original-senator-excellence-beyond-chronometer

[@earlscheib7754]

@@davidofglenbrook4487 boy it seems you don't recognize sarcasm. The movement is mediocre. Glashutte doesn't have a free sprung balance or an exemplary power reserve, the fact that several people didn't pick up on the fact that glashutte doesn't have a free sprung balance just shows how ignorant their customer base is.

[@ulisesalmoinadelcueto4276]

Dear Adrian... this is a great piece but just 3,500£ probably, even for that amount I probably thinking about to choose between this piece or the Seamaster 300professional, and I can say I'm a Rolex fanboy like you...but in this case Omega is a far superior piece, but unfortunately underrate watch...please review it!!! Thanks!!!

[@markdance574]

It looks like a grand Seiko diver slept with a panerai luminor - can you imagine how great this piece would be on a vacheron style bracelet- can’t help but feel GO do some truly stunning dials and this one ( on the video anyway ) could do more to pop . Very cool watch

[@dtaylor9673]

Great watch. Puts a Submariner in the shade on every technical point. And it's available at discount.

[@BarkandJack]

Discount is a good point.

[@dtaylor9673]

I have seen it listed for sale at under £6100 which makes it great value.

[@tomscott4438]

Most AD's are offering 20% discounts without much provocation.

[@taonguyen5174]

Just bought my blue SeaQ at 25% off brand new from an ad

[@SoCalWatchReviews]

Another great video brother! Love your strap on this bad boy!

[@will_the_don]

I love this watch so much, and I'd snap it up were it in my price range, but I do agree with the grievances you put forth

[@wheelsandwatches]

With white lume and no pcl it would be a goer. Love the style and size. The clasp is exceptional.

[@andreaiacolina]

I completely agree with you, Adrian. If I had this amount of cash, I would go for the Panorama Date.

[@lachg1714]

Power reserve should be 70 hours. I don't mind the closed case back. The trident is quite striking.

[@thepassionofthegoose5472]

I love my GO, but I'd never buy one or their sports watch. Seiko is what I reach for if bashing my watch is in my future.

[@austinzizzi1142]

The tropical strap works great and is historically accurate

[@search4light]

i absolutely love the dial. i wanted to buy a tudor pelagos but i just could not look at it after i saw that huge amount of text.

[@dsmlive3982]

According to the website you can get the caseback replacement with a clear to see the movement. Let me know

[@emmanueltsI5]

Great review Adrian! Wearing a Seiko SBP145 (blackbrownish dial) and had a coffee while watching your video. Surely, amazing engineering, nevertheless the price (and looks) does not make it attractive. Great video content as always! 👍

[@jonnytesillo1142]

How's it's going Adrian ?) I think that the measurements of this great horological piece fit perfectly into the category of a very classic watch, 39.5 mm in diameter, making it a versatile watch, without a doubt on your wrist it dresses phenomenally, by the way, I like the style of your videos. Cheers ⚔️💯💯👍🏻⚔️💪🏻

[@BarkandJack]

Hey Jonny, it's all going good thanks buddy. It's a sunny weekend, so can't complain. I agree the 39.5mm size really is a good one. I think more companies need to get on board with this. Thanks for watching mate and have a great weekend. Cheers, Adrian

[@jimbegin6554]

Nice watch, like the engraved case back. But the Pano date is the one! Thanks for review.

[@neilloveminecraft]

This reminded me of the seiko 62 mas the case and the strap. My question is whether the price of the seaq really worth it when 62mas is like 3 times cheaper and 62mas is also an original iconic watch

[@sargentmcbadass]

I wonder what the second hand prices will look like.

[@binxbolling5860]

Another great review. Would love to see one comparing and contrasting SeaQ Panoramic Date, Submariner, Pelagos, Fifty Fathoms, Seamaster, Oris, Hydroconquest. Okay, too long, but you get the idea....

[@rosco8166]

Great video Adrian, really glad you covered this watch, I really like the look, what's your on this v the Omega Seamster 300 1957 Edition?

[@btmontres1423]

I like it. An honest tool watch with solid content. But you're right, if faced between this and the earlier seaQ, I'd go for the admittedly more expensive version. The display back, strap and aesthetics make it better. Love both tho.

[@danold6443]

To me the power reserve is a non issue. I you park a watch to wear something else and its mechanical.... well you wind it up by hand or on one of your wolf winders, they still lose time! My AD for my TAG (sorry, most hated brand) did a quick wind up after a service, so mechanical quirks are something you have to live with. I do prefer the pana date version though with the see thru back. It lays cable on a rolex too and worth the money!!

[@austinzizzi1142]

Yeah this is a one watch contender for sure love the smaller SeaQ’s

[@edteach3r]

Another great video, thanks Adrian. I really like the Glashutte SeaQ range, but that price... ouch!

[@clausborg77]

I think if you are german and rich you go for this watch or maybe a rich collector, but we the limited buyers that struggle to buy a 2000 to 4000 £ watch we will go for an Omega, Tag Heuer, Breitling, more or less...to be honest I will be more than happy to buy a Steinhart Ocean One Vintage 103-0294 and with a Bark & Jack strap, pure beauty.

[@homefink2235]

Great Video, Adrian. Thanks. I totally agree. This is a nice watch, with a very good finish at all. But what is the unique selling proposition? I would prefer, as you said, the BB 58. Half price, better bracelet and outstanding on the wrist.

[@jaysikes4256]

Thankfully, you can get a heavy discount on GO. Great watch at 40% or more off. I'd proudly wear it at a lower price. Cheers.

[@BarkandJack]

40% off would be incredible!

[@BarkandJack]

I wonder if the same could be had for the Panorama Date. I'd sell one of my watches to get that thing, and at 40% it's more achievable.

[@BarkandJack]

Just done the calculations. Still can't afford it even at 40% off 😂

[@jaysikes4256]

@@BarkandJack Arggh, pre-owned market will be 60% off or more I reckon.

[@Iuckylukey]

Would you prefer three of these or one submariner?

[@CaptCanuck4444]

I want to like it as i respect GO the watchmaker, but I find the numerals to be cartoonishly large on the SeaQ - but less so on the SeaQ Panorama Date. And I agree, for that money there are so many choices...and one has to be a dedicated GO enthusiast to choose the SeaQ/SeaQ PD over other exceptional watches at that price point.

[@stueyx]

Hi Adrian, For £12k would you take the Glashutte over a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms? I can't think of anything else at that price point that would tempt me if I was given £12k and told to only buy a dive watch.

[@williama-d6]

Nice watch the gold rim on the bezel looks really good

[@ianrr1977]

Have the blue version. Amazing watch. Power reserve could be better, but the movement is also a remake of the original

[@jrlajarin]

I dont understand why its a huge amount of money for the Glashutte but not for a Sub ?

[@bauertime]

Does the regulator only regulate the beat of the balance on this watch?

[@petesjk]

I agree with Adrian about the Submariner. I’ve always liked it, but in-person, depending on the version, it often underwhelms me. The SeaQ dial seems to have better legibility, though maybe at the cost of bezel legibility. The Submariner case seems nicer to me. It’s pretty clear the movement is the star of the SeaQ. I actually prefer the SeaQ’s practical looks and legibility. I don’t know if the movement is as rugged and long-lasting as the Rolex.

[@joshs3916]

I’d stick with a Rolex. It’s a classic and never goes out of style. Both are nice pieces

[@pauldewar626]

In both Glashutte reviews you talk about this watch being on a different level to both Tudor and Rolex. But on what basis exactly ? Is it finished any better than the Rolex? Does it keep better fine than either of them? If the watchmaking is on another level, what exactly does it do better than the Submariner or the Black Bay / Pelagos ?

[@pauldewar626]

Should have read “Does it keep better time than either of them”

[@BarkandJack]

It’s the finishing and engineering. Rolex finishing really isn’t great. In fact I think it’s terrible for the price. Especially when GO, JLC and Grand Seiko are in the similar price banding and their finishing is far superior. If you get the chance, look at the edge of a Rolex hand through a loupe. It looks rough. Also there are plenty of examples of alignment issues with Rolex. The level of engineering in the GO is higher than Rolex with regards to the bezel, bracelet and clasp.

[@almac9203]

@@BarkandJack you should do a video on finishing and engineering and give examples of what distinguishes decent from great.

[@FirstDonkie]

Can you please explain why a lot of brands do not colour match the date wheel? It's an eyesore on this otherwise beautiful watch imo: black dial, a lot of faux patina but the whitest of white date wheel. Why??

[@carlhaluss]

Value, folks, Value! I don't think you missed anything. For a guy who spends a lot of money on watches, I don't mind spending this amount of money, but I have to feel like I am getting some value. 40 hrs power reserved for an expensive inhouse movement? And, yes, I have seen the watch in real life, and it is a beauty, and the one I saw was on the lovely textile strap. Value, as aesthetics, is in the eyes of the beholder. This watch simply does not represent good value! I might begin to slowly forgive the price, if it included the lovely stainless steel bracelet, and perhaps the rubber strap as part of the package as well. Even then I find it overpriced, as beautiful a watch as it is. It has actually made me lose a lot of the respect I did have for Glashutte Original. Cheers, Carl Sorry, I almost forgot to mention: excellent, personable and thorough review as always!

[@Youcantleavethisempty01]

The preference toward display case backs, especially those with beautifully finished movements, is a very new trend and I don't think it should be a requirement to justify a high price tag. This model is a freaking home run. I just wish the lume color was white.

[@joshs3916]

White Luke would make me “have” to get one

[@FazerWiz]

Great watch but I'm with you, the Panorama is lots more watch for the money. The display back, the large date window with the separate numerals and the gorgeous dial all add up to far more than the extra cost. Luckily I have a 7cm wrist that it doesn't look too big on, now I just need the cash :/

[@continuum4]

Adrian can you get hold of the new titanium Omega Seamaster? Would love to know your thoughts.

[@BarkandJack]

I'd love to get hands on with it. Looks wise, I think it's amazing. Expensive though.

[@robertn3121]

I have a Glashutte Original Sport Evolution Diver. Brilliant...

[@joninawhitecoat]

I've never really understood the importance of long power reserves. If you take off your watch and a day later it's still running and around the correct time then that's fine if it's a daily wear. If I leave if for two days then there's not much hardship in having to set the time and winding it. The whole point of mechanical watches is the interaction with the movement; getting to wind it and set it is tactile. If you want a long power reserve get a quartz.

[@JasonX2]

I agree, I like winding my watches.

[@BarkandJack]

I used to think this way, until I got my BB58, and I really notice the 70 hr power reserve. Although the main point here was with the pricing. Modern technology allows movements to have longer power reserves, so when paying a premium for a high end watch, I'd expect to have a good movement.

[@FazerWiz]

@@BarkandJack The Sub has only 8 hours more and that doesn't seem to have held it back. I wonder how much difference 8 hours makes in real world use. For me the main negs on this Glaschutte is the rather plain dial and the white coating around the numerals - it looks cheap. At this price point, I want a metal applied number/marker which is filled with lume, not something painted on.

[@felixbohnacker7188]

The design of the case and the bezel reminds me of the Seiko SPB051J1. Obviously, the dial and the caseback are very different however.

[@TechnoLawyer]

About power reserves - it's a fun stat, but never seems useful, because I change watches too often. Even give a watch a 100hr power reserve and it'll likely not be running when I pick it up again. I guess it's nice if you have an everyday watch you wear to work, and wear whatever else over the weekend, so you can put the work watch down Friday evening and it'll still be set when you pick it up Monday morning.

[@ripperx444]

the case just reminds me too much of the seiko SLA017 and i can’t get over it.

[@jh-il5sb]

i didn't see that until you mentioned it, but yes, it is very comparable