Harvest Time🔥Russian Nuclear Tests Failed☢️Kupiansk Direction In Danger⚔️Military Summary 2024.09.22

Рет қаралды 218,356

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 887

@militarysummary Ай бұрын

Download iOS Military Summary Map: itunes.apple.com/app/id6477433117 THE MAP: dev.militarysummary.com Store: www.militarysummary.store/ Google doc: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharing Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1613003 Telegram channel: t.me/militarysummary Twitter: twitter.com/MilitarySummary Email: military.summary.info@gmail.com Patreon: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true Help the channel: www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summary Help the channel: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true

@1Slavicpatriot333 Ай бұрын

You are best thank you for your updates❤

@UdderlyNewszy-x5t Ай бұрын

The test could have been a failed test on purpose to show the West that Russia is serious about the nuclear option.

@bjabbbjabb1286 Ай бұрын

Dima. The test is a test to check the fuel flow. Has nothing to do with the missile itself. Its a failure in the pipes at the facility. Sabotage??

@Kanvers_Martian Ай бұрын

Ай бұрын

nuclear test failed,what a suprise 😏

@antyspi4466 Ай бұрын

The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete. Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful. So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

Russia has a missile with a nuclear jet engine that can fly around the globe until given a target.

@Ricardo-lb4so Ай бұрын

In real world if a worldpower wish to make a statement of its ablity to strike and it fails.. that's a big problem. It confirms what hardcore NaTO analysts alllege about russian capablities.

@Fuck_your_mom_Weeb_Uniion Ай бұрын

Idioot😂😂😂

@norbertgeorge Ай бұрын

@@Ricardo-lb4soand what does it confirm? 🤔 Sounds a bit odd, for NATO who doesn't even have hypersonic weapons yet

@johnny666 Ай бұрын

They prob testing something new

@ivogacina9710 Ай бұрын

Dima its not nuclear test its missle test capable of carying nukes. Dont be fool.

@trumpforever6706 Ай бұрын

Exactly.

@MnemonicCarrier Ай бұрын

It's still embarrassing that it failed. It's also dangerous that it failed, because it now emboldens the US/NATO to attack Russia even harder. Then again, there have been several US and UK test missile exercises that have failed in the last few years. One of the funniest what when one of the UK's nuclear subs launched a missile, and instead of heading towards South Africa, it headed directly towards the US 🤣

@alfalayer76 Ай бұрын

I thinks with all the escalation, Dima is just saying the quite part out loud. Sure it’s a missile test but everyone knows what they can carry. Keep doing a good job Dima !!!

@alfalayer76 Ай бұрын

@@MnemonicCarriercrazy times , This situation can definitely lead to global catastrophe if not extinction. Power corrupts!!!

@jonnes__4657 Ай бұрын

Correct! .

@bjabbbjabb1286 Ай бұрын

This is why you test your stuff. To make sure it wont fail in a hot situation.

@pierrepatapon1547 Ай бұрын

The cope is strong here.

@bjabbbjabb1286 Ай бұрын

@@pierrepatapon1547 it was'nt even a test. It exploded in the silo.. sabotage for sure. Tighten up security would do the trick. I presume you are in the reciving end. Good luck.

@pierrepatapon1547 Ай бұрын

@@bjabbbjabb1286 😂😂😂😂😂 Ruscism lead to psychiatry, obviously. Dude, take care of your mental health

@stefanor.1771 Ай бұрын

@@bjabbbjabb1286 I don't even know if it is true, it is only reported by ukranian sources

@jasamshejn Ай бұрын

Ugledar is standing. Slava Zelenski

@nightelfuser Ай бұрын

Every single device that works flawlessly went through many failed tests during the development phase. I can only assume that the people who make fun of the failed Sarmat test have never been part of a serious project.

@apostolosderakis9840 Ай бұрын

@@nightelfuser sure but consider for a second the differences between this and Franklins kite experiment

@Princip666 Ай бұрын

Sarmat testing was completed almost two years ago, it entered serial production. The whole story is just bs.

@drgonzo305 Ай бұрын

The sarmet was supposedly out of testing and in service, considering the last 2 tests have been complete failures, that might have been premature. Maybe Putin can beg a few ICBM’s off of North Korea but considering how many North Korean munitions Russia just squandered at Toropets, I don’t think more aid shipments are heading to Russia. Russia needs to stop shooting down these Ukrainian drones if that’s the damage falling debris are causing, that looked like a 5kt nuke going off

@mindlos3960 Ай бұрын

Just refer critics of the Sarmat to the F35 jet if they are loooing for a military dud.

@drgonzo305 Ай бұрын

@@mindlos3960 how do you figure that? Over 1000+ F-35’s built and 4-5 crash’s mostly due to pilot era. Su-57 on the other hand has only 15-20 tops built and 2 have crashed and 1 to 2 lost to Ukrainian drones🤣. The Sarmat has exploded more times than it has flown

@24hourjukebox55 Ай бұрын

Dima..''According to Ukrainian sources''......😂🤣😂😅

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

Dima got a medal from a box of Captain Crunch cereal and Zelenski put him on the team. Now while spinning yarns he guzzles Ukraine Kool-aid.

@Sahasrarasmi-Sancodite Ай бұрын

❤❤ Dima may need to show a certain level of impartiality in his reporting, perhaps to be in accordance with yt guidelines that we are not aware of but he, as a content creator, is required to do so, to keep his news channel viable and up on the platform. Dont be too hard on him, he has a family and 2 other helpers to support.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

Yeah, this was an odd story, an explosion in a mine and then it would be a nuclear test. Not much info and details to back that story.

@zharkoo Ай бұрын

I was puzzled, but finally I figured what is Zelensky's victory plan: he will extract few more billions for himself and his Kiev friends, if you give it some thought that's really victory for him... not the kind of victory people expected, but hey, he's a comedian after all...

@James-z6x3u Ай бұрын

No, this is the illusion. The real reason the USA are supporting Ukraine is because Ukraine has over 12 trillion in natural resources in the eastern regions of Ukraine. All the evidence can be found by reading: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.

@zharkoo Ай бұрын

@@James-z6x3u I know... but that's Russia now, or in the near future

@johnjacobjingle8302 Ай бұрын

This is afgsnistan 2.0.. churn out a battle with no real plan to win for the next 20 years.. all so russia cant sell oil and gas to europe.

@333Mrhunter Ай бұрын

Zelensky is 💯% only consernewith saving his life. They even brought Zulshney to Keiv as a little reminder they have a replacement

@hanshirzel4156 Ай бұрын

One thing is certain - Zelensky is the first comedian in history who is responsible for so many dead and crippled human beings.

@m3bmuadib Ай бұрын

Failures are the main objective of a test

@grahamhireme9283 Ай бұрын

m3bmuadib Refinement is the main objective of a test. If it fails then something has to be fixed. If it flies, drives or plays music but doesn’t fulfill the original specifications then it’s not a complete failure it’s a work in progress

@stlouisix1 Ай бұрын

Lavrov stressed that Moscow also does not want an escalation of the Ukraine conflict that would drag the West in as a direct participant, but reiterated that this would inevitably be the case if Kiev is allowed to use long-range weapons deep inside Russia. “It would be a direct war of NATO against Russia… NATO is already waging a war against Russia, but it is a hybrid war through the hands of Ukrainians. If we are talking about long-range missile weapons, it is clear to everyone that the Ukrainians themselves will not be able to use them,” he stated, explaining that tasks such as target guidance, data collection from satellites and forming flight assignments can only be carried out by specialists from countries that produce a particular weapon. Lavrov went on to accuse Western officials who are seriously considering allowing Ukraine to make indiscriminate attacks on Russia of having the “mindset of a child” playing with matches. - RT

@michalzajic8602 Ай бұрын

i like to let you know Ukraine successfuly attack ammo dumps 400-500km from Ukraine wcalp or ATCSM have range 350 or 250 km

@trumpforever6706 Ай бұрын

@@MartijnTijssen-y4m After 20 years of war and full occupation of Afghanistan, the US and its allies have only succeeded in replacing the Taliban with the Taliban, which is a much more ridiculous result. So, based on your reasoning, I should conclude that NATO is not even capable of defeating the Taliban? 🤣

@charlesachilefu Ай бұрын

@@MartijnTijssen-y4m You are obviously the grandchild of the child playing with matches.

@Jocular-mt3jb Ай бұрын

A most brilliant reply, love from UK

@louissosa1535 Ай бұрын

@@MartijnTijssen-y4m Ukraine and the 52 countries that are backing it will eventually lose.

@007vsMagua Ай бұрын

If Russia uses nukes I'd bet they would come from a submarine.

@ultimateflyful Ай бұрын

there has been a theory for a long time that they have nukes in American cities already, in hiding waiting for a signal to blow.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

Doesn't take the brain's of Einstein to work that one out,same would happen on both sides.

@Sahasrarasmi-Sancodite Ай бұрын

❤❤ They are a triad nuclear mitary force. Which h one of 3 sources they use is up to the situation at hand and other conditions. AIR,SEA,LAND is considered a triad sources.

@slavaserbie9155 Ай бұрын

This says nothing about end result of test...

@donaldduck830 Ай бұрын

I totally disagree. Any missile started from a sub would have to fly too far to almost landlocked Ua. It would be far safer and quicker to launch a missile from a plane, together with other missiles. But you want to make sure that the air defence in your target area won't be able to counter you.

@adamos9879 Ай бұрын

You are giving misinformation Dima. What was destroyed in the ammo depot strike (in terms of tonnage) is equivalent to what RF forces for SMO uses in 12 hours. It will have no impact on the progress of SMO. If you want to provide a balance, analytical report it is best to not rely so heavily on Ukrainian sources, which are almost always grossley exaggerated and thoroughly misleading.

@am3177 Ай бұрын

👏👏👏

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

He's afraid if he doesn't, they will cut him off of Ukraine Kool-aid!

@tetractysAur Ай бұрын

Funny as hell adabotnik seems you're watching too much Orcky TV propaganda always down playing Ukrainian achievements 😂

@wolfdreams1545 Ай бұрын

@@tetractysAur What has Ukraine achieved since this w*r began outside of bleeding the EU and NATO dry of their money and weapons?

@gracebgray Ай бұрын

@@tetractysAur turn the mirror 🪞 around 👿🤡

@korana6308 Ай бұрын

Dima got Sarmat statistics wrong. Every launch was a success. Except for this one. Western sources have been saying of 2 unsuccessful launches based on unconfirmed sources. In reality only 1 bad launch. p. s. Can Dima provide the dates of when he thinks 4 launches of Sarmat had gone wrong? besides this one? It would be easy to check each one of them.

@BartholomewShirima Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂....I think Dima is now turning into. Parrot...🤣🤣🤣🤣

@stefanor.1771 Ай бұрын

Even this One Is unconfirmed, the pictures look dodgy

@clawsewitz4316 Ай бұрын

" Russia is never as strong as it looks. Russia is never as weak as it looks." Napoleon

@l337pwnage Ай бұрын

interesting quote

@jean-mariebrodin3107 Ай бұрын

Anyway, the most dangerous vector of nukes is the submarines, neither planes, nor balistic missiles

@stlouisix1 Ай бұрын

MILITARY TUBE TODAY - Strong footage of a powerful assault by the Airborne Assault Battalion of the 40th Guards Kamchatka Marine Brigade, shows the landing of stormtroopers on the front line, threatening the cauldron of the Armed Forces of Ukraine group in the town of Ugledar south of Donetsk. The Russian military correspondent shared the video on September 21, 2024, showing how the Russian assault force in an armored vehicle, successfully landed, attacked Zelensky's men, and occupied their stronghold. The thrilling assault was not without the work of scouts, where previously the Supercam unmanned aerial vehicle of the Pacific Fleet Marine Brigade, detected enemy positions, and the military equipment they were hiding. The Supercam UAV is used for in-depth reconnaissance, flying up to 70 kilometers into the enemy's rear, is almost silent and its integrated camera is the best in its class. The personnel and weapons found were destroyed on the same day, then the stormtroopers entered the next day. The Russian channel showed on the map the direction of the attack, after forcing Kashlagach River, the Kamchatka Marine Brigade continued to advance, and expanded the bridgehead west of Ugledar. The group of about 8 stormtroopers, in addition to driver, continued to bypass the Ukrainian defenses, hitting with shot after shot from close range directly in the enemy trenches, and without losses on the Russian side. They also attacked with FPV drones, eliminating Kiev personnel, and burning their equipment. As a result of the successful landing, the Marines occupied an important stronghold near Ugledar, which threatened to encircle the town. This meant that the town would soon be squeezed, the prospect of holding positions in such conditions was not encouraging for the Ukrainian troops still entrenched there. On the same day on the Ugledar cauldron, video footage was published of the breakthrough, where Kashlagach River and the advance to Novoukrainka began. More than 20 square kilometers of territory were liberated by Russian stormtroopers from the tank formations of the Vostok group from Buryatia, after fighting at the recently liberated Prechistovka. The ranks of Ukrainian soldiers wavered, about 12 men from the 58th Infantry Brigade, who valued life more than the Nationalist ideals, laid down their weapons, and raised their hands in repose. The surviving tank crew prisoners, lucky for the time being, spoke in a video published by Buryatia stormtroopers.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

Must be true then...

@robertmartin8436 Ай бұрын

This adds an in-depth insight to Dima's report and is valuable material contributing to general comprehension of the situation. Thank you for these additional reports of the current battle on this front.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

@@robertmartin8436 which are sadly for you,not the truth.

@dropsofink1336 Ай бұрын

SARMAT has been tested successfully many times. This time was to test new warheads. It blew up. Looks like it is ready.

@destructionswordspet Ай бұрын

Yep that was testing weapon. Imagine ukraine supporters thought it was caused by drone attacking arsenal in rusia lmao 🤣🤣🤣

@vanceofthetube Ай бұрын

What's some failed tests... Americans lost more than 10 F35s just taking off and landing😂

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

They lost another when a female pilot bailed out over North Carolina and it kept flying until running out of fuel. Found it three days later.

@Schurkie505 Ай бұрын

And Russian planes fall also out of the sky like flies

@wolfdreams1545 Ай бұрын

@@Schurkie505 Russian aircraft (Su-34 for instance: $34M) aren't worth a hundred million per aircraft unlike the F-35 ($109M). 10 being gone is over a billion dollars down the drain. US pocketbook hurts way more than Russia's.

@dmacarthur5356 Ай бұрын

Ask any US Marine if they like flying in an Osprey.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

Even some that they cannot find any more, including the pilots. Very weird.

@kirrausanov Ай бұрын

Hitler rationalizing indiscriminate violence and brutality of SA units (at the time he found them indispensable): "They do, what they do". Zelensky rationalizing existence of neonazi AZOV units: "They are, who they are."

Ай бұрын

We know that they are the bad guys, but they are _our_ bad guys. - NATO

@izzythompson9982 Ай бұрын

Peace not NATO🧙‍♂️

@MrAppyCow Ай бұрын

Who invaded who again?

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

@@MrAppyCow There was a USA backed coup in 2014 in Ukraine. One can see that as an invasion and removing the government and plant puppets. There is a phone recording of Nuland planning this. Find it.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

@@MrAppyCow The history of the conflict did not start at Feb 2022 out of the blue. Inform yourself better.

@MrAppyCow Ай бұрын

@@hongry-life That's a silly way to twist the meaning of my comment. Was there war before the invasion? Russia declared the war for which I see so many accounts demand peace from NATO. Playing the victim and downplaying Russia's role in all of it. NATO are no saints, but to think Russia is just a passager in all of this and doesn't act coercively for it's own interests is delusional. I'm pointing out hypocrisy and the ridiculousness of some of these comments that I suspect some are bots. I'm not an expert, on the matter but neither are you, so don't message me with a superior attitude.

@bluikkso Ай бұрын

@@MrAppyCow "Was there war [...]?" so you are saying there was no civil w** from 2014 to 2022 and AFU was not committing punitive strikes daily in the Donbas?

@paulmicks7097 Ай бұрын

Thank you Dima, great updates and analysis

@joeschmoe21 Ай бұрын

I don't think they are 'failing'. They are tweaking the variables, knowing that their predictions (simulations) may not be accurate. So each 'failure' is just a data point.

@frankyyaggabot6222 Ай бұрын

😂No. Missile explodes impromptu on the ground prior to doing the whole flying to destination thing ... that's a failure!

@s.v.discussion8665 Ай бұрын

These silos generally are used for testing. It is more important that strategic missiles are mobile and not in silos, which are easy and static targets. And tests are for this, to test and can fail. All within normality.

@nightelfuser Ай бұрын

Exactly, and the bots that mock Russia for the failed tests don't get it because they have never partaken in a serious project before.

@d3vodestroyer519 Ай бұрын

@@MrAppyCowOH SORRY for encouraging the right side in this war sorry for being on the side that is historically right idc what you say you have no arguments the us did this and they will pay with all of Europe

@MrAppyCow Ай бұрын

@@d3vodestroyer519 Frist of all, I can tell you missed the point of my comment by the way you answered. No need to get emotional. I'm sane enough to accept different views of the world. What I can't stand is hypocricy and double standards. I agree that West is guilty as well, but the russian side of media is full of it. You just cognitively blur it so it's not appearent.

@alkazarjkdghjd Ай бұрын

@@d3vodestroyer519 A country that spent 8 year bombing his civilian and had neo-nazi in it's governement can not be called "the right side"...

@ExpatZ266 Ай бұрын

@@MrAppyCow You say that yet Russian media has provided really the only reliable reports about all of this for the last 2 years while western/Ukrainian sources have proven themselves unreliable wishful thinking and/or outright misinfromation. Established proven reality does not match your claims.

@nikoskn1252 Ай бұрын

So far, the Sarmat had both successful and unsuccessful tests. That means it works but it has a flaw that can lead to some cases of failure. Iron it out.

@trumpforever6706 Ай бұрын

Like Minuteman III (see november 2023 test) and the last two English Tridents launched from submarines.

@sleepyjoe7843 Ай бұрын

Reminds me of SpaceX with bunch of failures in 2014+ years. It's a normal thing to fail and collect data to improve.

@marinkovacevic8732 Ай бұрын

The test doesn't have to be about carrier but also warhead. There's a reason why conventional warheads are not used in ICBMs (physics).

@FabiusPolis Ай бұрын

Rocket tests are always complicated and don't have always the purpose to launch, but to put maximum stress on a single module and collect data how it behaved until everything broke apart. Very common at spaceX tests for example

@brockkomar4743 Ай бұрын

Musk figured it out after dozens of failures practice make perfect

@elysianfields1671 Ай бұрын

It’s important to never look at isolated events or small victories here and there. The greater picture is what matters, and who wins in the end is what matters. And in that matter, Russia is beating Ukraine.

@stlouisix1 Ай бұрын

We Don't Negotiate With TERRORISTS: Russia Officially Refused To Negotiate With The WEST and UKRAINE The situation of the Ukrainian Army continues to deteriorate rapidly in the Kursk region and other directions of the front. Against this backdrop, the Russian Armed Forces continue to launch massive missile strikes on the territory of Ukraine almost every day. With these massive missile attacks, Russia is not only disrupting enemy logistics but also significantly reducing the combat potential of the Ukrainian Army and NATO forces. By the way, today was also no exception in terms of massive Russian missile attacks on the territory of Ukraine. - BORZZIKMAN

@bak2back Ай бұрын

Zele still thinks he's a king, while living on hand outs. The king with no clothes 😂👍

@weedylock Ай бұрын

What has he achieved since he became a president lol only found new foster parrent for his country lol Biden being his foster father lol

@mussydesign7933 Ай бұрын

the emperor that destroyed his empire and people sadly

@cafecomescrita Ай бұрын

Wow, disinfo right at the start. No Nuclear Weapon was tested, it was allegedly a missile launch. Also, "according to Ukranian Sources"? You're kidding, right?

@zharkoo Ай бұрын

Guys, honest question: why is nobody mentioning the F16 gamechangers anymore? I mean, 17% of Ukrainian fleet was destroyed by the drunk pilot of the garbage plane, but still the remaining 83%, that is, the 5 of them left, what are they doing?

@inezm8444 Ай бұрын

Apparently scrapped the idea of using them...

@m.cl.ballista4642 Ай бұрын

The Americans keep them back to avoid sales disaster in other countries. What, you think they care for the pilots safety? LOL

@Ralph-e5q Ай бұрын

Good point. What about them?

@elderwiz3165 Ай бұрын

It did not change any game... That's why..

@Worldturnedupsidedown Ай бұрын

Hiding

@Peregrin3 Ай бұрын

For the people who think that a missile exploding shows Russian weakness, just take a look at the number of rockets from Space X that exploded, Rockets are very complex and it only takes one tiny problem to cause a major failure.

@galileo_rs Ай бұрын

Avangard is a HGV: hypersonic glide vehicle. It can carry nuclear and conventional payload. The kinetic impact alone is about 20 tons of TNT but that can be enhanced with an explosive payload. As for the claims that one storage facility provides ammo for 2 months of war that is nonsense. There is no such storage capability in a single facility on the face of the Earth. Ammo expenditure is so huge that one facility barely holds enough for a few days.

@bluikkso Ай бұрын

Don't you bring reality to this discussion... the OTAN fan boys need something, anything to give hope now that the battle on the ground is "developing not in Ukraine's favor" so hard every day.

@pong9000 Ай бұрын

Some people are impressed by fireworks. Ukraine needs new weapons: the Sparkler, the Screeching Devil, the Roman Candle.

@kenrik2105 Ай бұрын

The Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle travels at Mach 25, which explains its tremendous kinetic energy.

@albertorodas6479 Ай бұрын

It is just a missile test only. Not a nuke test.

@m.cl.ballista4642 Ай бұрын

"The comet of Defeat is falling to UA with lightning speed and nothing can change it's course" ~ 🦕🦕🦕🌠☄️🔥🔥~

@michalzajic8602 Ай бұрын

well i did see some comet landed in russia and it did create 3,8 magnitude eathquake

@marcospereiradesousa6910 Ай бұрын

@@michalzajic8602 I'm sure the russians collected all the data on that...

@genes.3285 Ай бұрын

Northrop was working on a stealth cruise missile in the late 80s and early 90s. TSSAM. TriService Standoff Attack cruise Missile.They spent 2 billion on the program but never got it to fly.

@ramrod9556 Ай бұрын

I am not sure about that claim of foreign intelligence of the missile explosion. That picture of the SARMAT test site seems suspicious to me. No tower or launch wreckage anywhere, no rescue vehicles and no smoke from small lingering fires that burnt all the grass at the site. All the foliage on the cleared part has supposedly burned off yet no black burned patches and all the tree and shrubbery in the area show zero signs of damage or fire. Who knows when this picture was taken. This picture could well have been taken months after a failed missile test years ago and no one can tell if the satellite picture is doctored. I'll wait for more evidence.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

It's a silo explosion,which is hardened.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

I see no signs of a recent explosion either.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

@@hongry-life you won't if it's a silo explosion. Only source for that is the US satelites that will have picked it up,they sit monitoring the silos for a launch.

@pong9000 Ай бұрын

Whatever. The revelation that Russian nukes can't get off the ground should be given to Biden along with Zelensky's Victory Plan, so he can make an informed decision.

@ExpatZ266 Ай бұрын

If it was an image from Maxxar it is a CIA production.

@JohnSmith-lc6gq Ай бұрын

And the one that the brits were testing just end up next to the submarine that made the launch 😂😂😂

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

It's called a test,which happens. It's different to a silo explosion

@JohnSmith-lc6gq Ай бұрын

@@SnakePliskin762 witch you can also call a test, and check the picture and you can see how old it looks

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

@@JohnSmith-lc6gq it's a test gone seriously wrong to cook a silo.

@nigellawson8610 Ай бұрын

Just imagine what one of those Avingaurd hypersonic warheads would do to the European Parliament.

@TheNtcc Ай бұрын

If the Russian can lift it off ground. Looks like they still can't.

@Princip666 Ай бұрын

I can't believe Dima swallowed that Sarmat story so easily. Big disappointment.

@Br1cht Ай бұрын

You can use Putin-Vril energy to fix that.

@Princip666 Ай бұрын

@@Br1cht Using brain is enough for me, I hope that thing you mentioned, whatever it is, helps you.

@feelingspolicedbyyoutube Ай бұрын

Denial is not a river in Egypt

@stefanor.1771 Ай бұрын

He has to otherwise his site would be deleted like London real

@mirandela777 Ай бұрын

Some confusions rised b your description of Avangard system : is not a "warhead" but yes, a hypersonic vehicle - a manuvering glider - who sits on top of the missile (the carrier) and is released at high altitude, moment when it starts maneuvering, in a variable, unpredictible trajectory, towards its target, at speeds reaching Mach 20 (high hypersonic). And yes, is true, easy to check for anyone with basic math skills, the kinetic energy of an object hitting its target as such speed multiplicated many times by the object mass, can reach very high values, in this case, equal or even bigger than the explosion of 18 tons of TNT. But the big problem for the target is in the fact the vehicle can be hardened enough to penetrate very deep underground, making such a weapon devastating even for deep, well protected bunkers...

@nacra613 Ай бұрын

Excellent content as usual. For English speakers "silo" would be more accurate than "mine" when referring to the launch sites.

@kxmalahov Ай бұрын

it is a test to make it work %100. tests can fail. it is normal. Anyway its a newest missile(2023). Russia still got other active missiles like: RSM-56 Bulava (2018) MIRV-equipped/SS-NX-30 RS-24 Yars (2011): MIRV-equipped. R-29RMU Sineva MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Sineva mode 2 R-29RMU2 (2014) MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Liner R-36M2 Voevoda / SS-18 Satan UR-100N 15A30 / SS-19 Stiletto RT-2PM Topol / 15Zh58 / SS-25 Sickle RT-2PM2 Topol-M / SS-27 / RS12M1 / RS12M2 R-29R SS-N-18 Stingray R-29RK SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 2 R-29RL MIRV-equipped/SS-N-18 Stingray Mod 3 R-29RM MIRV-equipped/SS-N-23 Skiff Sleep well. all of them passed tests!!!

@mathilde-b1e Ай бұрын

About the silo explosion lets wait what the russians say .

@feelingspolicedbyyoutube Ай бұрын

Yep. That will be the truth😂😂😂😂😂

@nerinine Ай бұрын

Sarmat is the new russian ICBM. New weapons take time to BE reliable.

@daffyduck780 Ай бұрын

I is not even relevant to this war.

@genrcflyer Ай бұрын

They have a lot of SS-18s.

@bfa-xi1py Ай бұрын

Kid, you do not know what nuclear tests are?

@troutymctrouttrout3809 Ай бұрын

I'm thrilled that Russia is finally taking their security seriously by testing Sarmats and Avangards. These are horrifying weapons the likes of which the world has never seen and will send a strong message of deterrence. It's disappointing to hear of the failed test but much like a space rocket it's important to test these weapons systems carefully to determine their boundaries and capabilities. These type of tests make the weapons systems more reliable which means less chance of danger to innocent civilians which Russia, unlike their nazi enemies, take quite seriously.

@rickandbrandonshow Ай бұрын

The USA had an icbm fail a few months ago. So this isn’t a big deal it happens. That’s why you test

@bjabbbjabb1286 Ай бұрын

This calls for a revision control to learn if any sabotage has been taking place. Like the one time a Topol was found having the gyro upside down. Inspection showed 15 other Topols had the same flaw. It was a bunch of pacifist mechanics who sabotage them.

@billcarpenter5271 Ай бұрын

Spasibo Bolshoye General Dima!

@VeeFTeeS Ай бұрын

That seems like a burnt surface and not an explosion. 🤷‍♂️

@blubard6105 Ай бұрын

Amazing news Dima.

@olegfedorov3225 Ай бұрын

Dima is talking a lot of nonsense about Sarmat and Avangard.

@lenochodsid6595 Ай бұрын

Avangard is so fast it is perfect bunker buster... So Zelensky will take long vacation somewhere out of UA i think

@deven6518 Ай бұрын

Avangard is a carrier for a nuclear warhead. It is a maneuverable carrier. One sarmat costs alot, too much to use randomly

@dorisganz1631 Ай бұрын

That's why you test, the United States as far as we know hasn't done any.

@vulcan8288 Ай бұрын

actually the missile was never launched the crater occurred after the fuelling stage of the test had encountered some fire anomalies, according to the west outlets the cobra ball which tracked such missile launches never detected sarmat launch at all and the type of crater showed it was caused by fire from fuel leak in a forest test site

@jgarbo3541 Ай бұрын

Sarmat is an ICBM. It can carry various armaments. So it was not a failed *_nuclear_* test. Click bait title.

@cleopisano9758 Ай бұрын

I hear ukraine tanks have entered Moscow and are also on the outskirts of Vladivostok!😅

@andrewkuc5861 Ай бұрын

It seems to me that Dima with some kind of pleasure reports on failure of the Sarmat launch and the damage caused by Ukrainian attacks on Russian ammo storages.

@DARKSTAR-mn8ee Ай бұрын

Nyet to Naziukropnato...🤗❤️🇷🇺👍

@michalzajic8602 Ай бұрын

No to new axis of evil Russia-North Korea-Iran

@knurft886 Ай бұрын

The sarmat test failed according to osint. Osint is open source intelligence.

@FabiusPolis Ай бұрын

osint is a pro-ukranian us backed group. weeb union made a report about their "work" and the flaws in it to favour ukranian positions

@SuperLuky64 Ай бұрын

You were the only one who firmly thought they were drones, but if you looked carefully you would have known that the best drones supplied to Ukraine travel at most like the DJI Phantom 3 SE: 4 km, a little more if they have repeaters scattered around the place. In that sector in Russia it was impossible to install receivers, and it was at a good distance from any kind of drone at 400 km.

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

And if drones, was the ammo being stored in garden sheds? A drone cannot take out a hardened bunker!

@Brekhald Ай бұрын

It is possible that Ukraine used Kursk operation to insert sabotage groups inside Russia armed with drones. Probably Russia stored missiles outside the silos while waiting for transport and that was a easy target.

@off6848 Ай бұрын

They use Cessna planes remote controlled It makes it hard to shoot down because you risk killing a civilian

@pong9000 Ай бұрын

For at least a year they've made stabs with modified UJ-22 and A-22 civilian prop planes. Few weeks ago one was videoed inside Russia near Finland being shot down. And it's happened before, wreckage included. These aren't quad copters! Modified passenger planes evade defense by flying very low and of course appear as civilian so pass unremarked. Also, whose to say they won't try even larger planes?

@TTheo-ok9zz Ай бұрын

Back to school Dima nobody test the missile Near the cities 😊 bla bla like always

@brianmurray1395 Ай бұрын

Masters of the witches cauldron.

@kerzhemanov Ай бұрын

This is called "silo" not "mine" :)

@Nordy941 Ай бұрын

Nuclear weapons will likely work in real life situations over 90%

@AXS512 Ай бұрын

I doubt tests like that would be done near Moscow. There was a report a few days ago that the nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya was brought back in order for new tests. So with so many test site areas more isolated for security. It's doubtful they would use a site so near the Moscow region.

@Alec72HD Ай бұрын

He never said there were any nuclear tests. Pay attention.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

@@Alec72HD He mentioned nuclear warheads at 3:29 min.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

@@Alec72HD But later indeed about a new warhead called Avantgard. Edit: The Avangard (Russian: Авангард, "Vanguard"; previously known as Objekt 4202, Yu-71 and Yu-74) is a Russian hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) that can be carried as an MIRV payload by the UR-100UTTKh,[9][10] R-36M2 and RS-28 Sarmat heavy ICBMs. It can deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads." (Wikipedia) Interesting that Avangard in Russian would be Vanguard (typo edited), like the USA entity with 1000 tentacle companies and institutions. Weird that USA loves the Russian word then. "The vanguard (sometimes abbreviated to van and also called the advance guard) is the leading part of an advancing military formation" Hm... shines a new light on throwing new conscripts in a van...

@AXS512 Ай бұрын

@@Alec72HD And neither did I,read better.

@alkazarjkdghjd Ай бұрын

@@hongry-life avant-guard is a French word, vanguard is originating from the French like many word used in the military.

@dturner8567 Ай бұрын

Getting really tired of your misinformation and relying on “Ukrainian sources” and MSM. Just stick to the battleground.

@troyhackney148 Ай бұрын

This channel really took a nosedive

@BartholomewShirima Ай бұрын

Sarmat is not a nuke Dima..😂😂.it is an ICBM. not yet armed when testing. Just a delivery machine.

@castlerock58 Ай бұрын

The Sarmat is a new missile. I don't even know if it is operational yet. This was not a nuclear test. That would have been major news. It would have meant that Russia was leaving the nuclear test ban treaty.

@James-z6x3u Ай бұрын

Read this: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy ... that explains this war.

@kobked-x Ай бұрын

12 trillion in rare earth minerals in Ukraine...

@James-z6x3u Ай бұрын

Complete list of things to read that will prove the USA is invested only in the resources: Critical Minerals and U.S. Public Policy, U.S. Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy, U.S. Critical Materials Strategy reports, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports, International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, Brookings Institution publications, Council on Foreign Relations publications, Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports, 2021 U.S.-Ukraine memorandum on critical minerals.

@mindlos3960 Ай бұрын

Do we really have to let so many people die for these minerals. There are many counties that can sell mineral rights to the US let’s start there. This war is a silly man’s folly.

@newworldforward1842 Ай бұрын

Using Sarmat to deliver conventional warheads would be insanely expensive. Far more expensive than 18 x Kinzhal.

@jeffyasmine4533 Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂lol my Man do you really believe in the info from Ukraine?😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Bernadette-y2b Ай бұрын

This launch pad 43 of Plesetsk cosmodrome is like that since March 1980, when a Vostok 2M launch failed. The picture can be found on the internet.

@brianmurray1395 Ай бұрын

Russia doesn't need to use nukes.

@gordanajovanovic3892 Ай бұрын

Go RUSSIA!!🇷🇺

@andreipetrov4850 Ай бұрын

The failed test of a missile that has been already put in service (if correct)? This is quite a news to scratch it as briefly. Someone gotta clarify this. Too much hype and too much mess in the news (not unusual)

@ramrod9556 Ай бұрын

Fake news I'm thinking. Who knows when this picture was taken? No smoke, all shrubbery and perimeter trees have zero damage, no wreckage or rescue vehicles. Satellite photo would be easy to fake.

@SnakePliskin762 Ай бұрын

Silo explosion,happened to a US Titan in 1980.

@33276344 Ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😜😛😜😜😛😝🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@kasumimori1798 Ай бұрын

One learns more from one's failures in testing than from one's successes. Unless the Russians are paying less than no attention, then these failures aren't nearly as complete as is being supposed.

@Belmontetursiops Ай бұрын

More than 6 minutes wasted on speculations. Stick with facts please. No need to play the "crystal ball" game.

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

Every time he spins a yarn, Zelenski sends him more Ukraine Kool-aid!

@snuffle2269 Ай бұрын

I look at the picture and ask a couple of questions having seen videos of some of the major launches of the huge ballistic missile launches. First, large crater but where is the debris? Nothing appears to be scattered like huge chunks of concrete. Second, not much of a scorch mark around the crater. Why with all that fuel wasn't a giant torch sent off into space as well as burning 50-100 meters out in all directions especially into the forests the way the two ammo dumps burned. Just above the word "time" is a typical missile silo. (You don't stick 2 silos together in the same area) It has a huge protective cap with a door that blows open seconds before the firing trigger. There is a strip to the right where the tractor trailed maneuvers in to set up for the massive tilting of the missile to lower it into the silo. In this region there are a number of combat silos (62 d 42.50m 99s North 40d 11 m 04.07 s East ) The Kosmodrom Piesetsk is at 62d 55m 39.75s North 40d 34m 30.0 s East. For a US Minuteman II silo (there are 4 north of this one off Nebraska Hwy 71) go to 41d 17m 42.55s North 103d 39m 41.45s West. Again only one missile per immediate area.

@LemuelSarkis-dl5kk Ай бұрын

Interesting. What, then, would you speculate is the cause?

@guylemaire2832 Ай бұрын

It seems that Kursk ukrainian operation can be now considered as a failure: huge lost of personnal, vehicles and other equipment, impossibility to reach the nuclear central of Kursk. Thus, Mr Zelensky is coming , day after day, to be the loser world champion ! Unfortunately, the support countries did not realize or cannot admit that the carrots are already cooked and this will certainly bring more and more issues to their own people standard of living conditions.

@josephvanwie6706 Ай бұрын

Russia has killed more than 15,000 in Kursk so far and the majority of the rest cannot escape. But Zelenski's plan is on target?

@feelingspolicedbyyoutube Ай бұрын

Bet you a dollar the US won't

@EdCamilo-x1h Ай бұрын

Excellent reporting.

@KingOhmni Ай бұрын

So. A few warehouses go bang? How many more does Russia have and how quickly can it stock such a warehouse? Answer. Lots and rather rapidly. At the moment Ukraine cannot strike such targets fast enough and all at once across all of Russia, so as to strategically impact the current direction of the conflict.

@TepurangaHeremaia-ce4qe Ай бұрын

Nearly everyone commenting in chat is an expert. Jelly brain Crackups. 😂😂😂

@Cameron-x1r Ай бұрын

Military summary channel telling us all again that we are about to be nuked...must be Sunday.

@anettemor1730 Ай бұрын

all this makes no sense. so close to Moscow towns are one next to another without any distance. They show area where NO FREE SPACE AVAILABLE for such testing site. all bs.

@drgonzo305 Ай бұрын

So the last 2 tests of the Sarmat either blew up in the silo or shortly after?!😂 I’m sure they have plenty left stored at Toropets….😂

@zani1106 Ай бұрын

The US Minuteman III ICBM for example has failed on the launchpad both in 2023 and 2022 and its development is stalled. The Sarmat is in Military Service and is continually improved and updated its latest variants being 2018 and 2022. The Russians will just get back to work learn, improve and succeed because they are unrivaled by anyone this isn't a setup back, embarrassing or anything like that that is typical Western media whitewashing and Russians don't care I don't care (and I aint even Russian) Russia has many ICBM missiles which are decades ahead of US equivalents the marvelous 'Topol' for example. Then there is the 'Avangard' a nuclear powered jet engine intercontinental ballistic glide vehicle for which passed tests and has no equal in the World PERIOD! No one doubts Russian ICBM Missile Firepower but Western Media Propaganda will always paint the picture of the opposite. In War with NATO guess what Russia would do in the first few minutes Cripple American and NATO Satellite's and ISR and how will it do it? On September 17th Russia lunched the Angara-1.2 rocket carrying a classified payload into Earth's orbit, With military satellites on board, the exact mission remained undisclosed. Russia has launched the Kosmos 2575 military satellite in 2024 and similarly in 2002 and 2023 this baby sparked allot of concern in Washington. Off course this is not relevant to Country 404 formally Ukraine.

@Sahasrarasmi-Sancodite Ай бұрын

COUNTRY 404, "FORMERLY" yakettyyak.

@hongry-life Ай бұрын

So a Sarmat was tested in a mine? Sounds odd to me.

@allebepleinadamwest3554 Ай бұрын

Slava RUSSIA FROM MOROCCO!!!!!!

@mohamedsaid2882 Ай бұрын

The Samart missiles could be repurposed to carry the father of all bombs it’s not a nuke but it packs quite a punch

@geofreykato3976 Ай бұрын

Z Z Z Z until I die

@pierrepatapon1547 Ай бұрын

You're already dead inside, Z-ombis.

@m.cl.ballista4642 Ай бұрын

Z- zombies eat brains, but there aren't any in UA...that's why.

@michalzajic8602 Ай бұрын

that will be prety soon.russia is already Z nation

@pedjatrninic Ай бұрын

@@michalzajic8602 you have been in russia?

@AZ-bp5zo Ай бұрын

#2 🥉 🥉

@blengi Ай бұрын

Sarmat not quite as bad as USSR's N1 moon rocket that blew catastrophically 4 times in a row with out ever reaching space, first launch killing almost a 100 people

@PeteSinHouston Ай бұрын

Testing a missile system (not a “nuclear warhead”) popping up from a nuclear hardened bunker is quite complex. The silo itself must be properly built and maintained. If you have 3 successes and 5 failures for a brand new system, that’s actually not a very bad ratio. The missile has proven it works with 3 successes. After successes, the designers will test for abnormal launch conditions or the silo may have reached a point of degradation such that it no longer provides a viable launch environment. Remember, this is not an open air launch. Massive amounts of explosive power must be properly vented, this is a liquid propulsion rocket so the lines attached to the missile must be fully functional. If you keep using the same test silo over and over for the same missile - that wear and tear could cause problems. The Sarmat is a HUGE and heavy missile. The Baluga missile (SLBM) went through 10 years of nothing but failure before it was perfected. As for using such an outrageously expensive strategic missile system on Ukraine - that would be insane. These are not mass produced missiles and serve as the core, or backbone, of Russia’s strategic deterrent. For all the emotions surrounding this conflict - it would make no sense to use this missile in that theater. That would be absurd beyond belief.