I own the SSL12 and the sound is so clean without being sterile, the ADAT ability and seperate mixes and very flexible software packages really sold it for me though, allowing me to send seperate headphone mixes was a must for recording with others, and this interface allows that with perfect workflow! I definetly will be picking up a preamp for that ADAT
@AldinPereira3 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video. I was waiting for this comparison. Lovely video
@Chris_R_3 ай бұрын
Great comparison - thank you for this work. I think it’s such a great time to be a musician or recording engineer… so many great gear choices at such affordable prices. It’s hard to go wrong with even a little research and thought. I’m personally looking to finally upgrade my Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 2nd gen interface to one of these, and I’m happy knowing either choice would serve me really well for years and years to come. I’m also pondering the UA Apollo Solo, since it’s around the same price point. Thanks again for such a great video and work done here!
@KBDenson50Ай бұрын
Thanks for this. Earlier today (before watching this) I ordered an SSL 12, after carefully looking at the UA 476P (and everything else on Sweetwater Sound [US]). I liked the per- input 48v and high-pass across the top, with fairly granular signal meters in-line, and that 32-bit should be more valuable than than the UA compression. ADAT was also a big plus. These were super helpful reviews.
@iengineer_2473 ай бұрын
I had both. The SSL is dope you can add more channels to it via adat and can use the talkback mic in the recording like a room mic. The volt is cool but the volume for the monitoring is kinda iffy. Both are dope interfaces depending on what you need them for input wise.
@DougAustin19 күн бұрын
The biggest advantage the Volt has is mobile compatibility, SSL 12 requires their software. The “throttling” that you described is more likely a limitation necessitated by making it compatible with iOS/Android. While the SSL is a great product, it loses a bit of flexibility in that regard. I do use an iPad to do quick things on the go when traveling, and for users like myself, that’s definitely something to consider as well.
@jeffagoddard2 ай бұрын
Great review! The SSL is the clear winner, but I use an Apollo x4 and UAD plugins in Console. The x4 addresses the 476P short-comings. Independent headphone cues, 3 output pairs, ADAT ins/out, 48v per channel, etc. I use a MOTU 8 pre with the Apollo x4 for 12 inputs in total. I’d like to know more about the SSL software versus the UA Console, which I use for everything. Loopback, virtual channels, system & DAW audio mixing for video, classic Chanel strips, compressors, eq, etc.
@CorNigrum3 ай бұрын
SSL has the PureDrive preamps now to connect to that ADAT port. Audient has a few mic preamps too for adding extra ADAT channels with some colour.
@riloh5825 күн бұрын
Came to comments to say exactly this. Thought someone would have noted it. 👍
@dvsmАй бұрын
Awesome video!!!! thanks a lot!. Have you tried as "stand alone" ? I mean turning the mac off and listening what's coming from the inputs. This is for live monitoring or just listening external instruments. I have a digital mixer that got broken so thinking to buying this.
@roman23742 ай бұрын
I would never record with the 4k button activated, however its super useful when I have video calls or similar settings - where I won't do post production on my voice and just want to have a little more presence and clarity in my speaking voice :)
@21_RecordsLabel.24 күн бұрын
Why you Don t record with 4k . I think to buy ssl 12 in the future And as my knowledge the 4k Britton give s caractere and some anologe saturation give some energy of the recording . What your opinion about that
@michaeltrenier15 күн бұрын
Great comparison.
@HarrysoundАй бұрын
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.
@yobhsiFehT3 ай бұрын
The "upgrade path" point is an excellent one! And SSL does make outboard banks of pres for ADAT expansion with the PureDrive Quad and Octo - also at 32bit! 😊
@demolitiondayrecords2 ай бұрын
Vintage preamp on the UA sounds awesome by itself but I would keep the SSL as well.
@atticusroberts145720 күн бұрын
I’m looking at something to replace my Apollo Arrow (which is now the solo I think?) You are spot on about upgrades, there’s nothing UA that makes sense for me to buy even though I love the plugins and software. I’m glad the volt has midi, I have to keep my old Audiobox plugged in just for midi but the Volt doesn’t make sense to me without the same mixing software console for routing Apollo interfaces have. Add the inputs being at the front and it just feels intentionally designed not to be a viable option compared to their more expensive options. I’ve been thinking about either an EVO 16 or SSL 12 now I’ve been reading more about them.
@velocitystudiomix3 ай бұрын
SSL-12 (4 channels) connected via ADAT to the SSL Puredrive Octo (with 8 channels) gives you a total of 12 preamps/channels! 🎉
@JosephSouthard2 ай бұрын
32bit as great, but sharing files with band mates is - yah, they all use 24bit 96khz - so it becomes a sample mess. With the standards all over the place, & a ton of added gimmicks, I'm sticking with the "lower standards " for now. I hope all the units make it to 32bit. Most everything over 96khz is overkill anyway, so along as they atleast go to 96khz. Great video, thanks for sharing.
@vanizell793727 күн бұрын
UA 476P with vintage and comp circuit on introduced some phase-y sounds as well. Can't quite say "phase discrepancies" as it appears you are only using a single microphone source.
@NoffisNoff20 күн бұрын
I own the VOLT 476P and don't want to change for the SSL because one thing: SOUND. The preamps give my synths a hot analogic color without to lost hours to set a compressor. An another point i can check easily all signal levels during the jam session. If i want a good interface for the connectivity my first priority will be a Dante option 🤷♂
@humanwaveform3 ай бұрын
I've also seen comments about the SSL 12 having too much gain to record louder sources. Was wondering your thoughts on that as well. Thanks for the comparison video, it's helpful.
@KevinVelghe-sq5wu3 ай бұрын
Apollo X4 seems your taste.
@brianboyer9383Ай бұрын
That's not Sirius Black. It's Professor Severus Snape. Also, as others have already pointed out, SSL makes the Pure Drive Quad and Octo preamps.
@HarvVideoAudioStuffАй бұрын
No need to double down then eh? 😂
@brianboyer9383Ай бұрын
@@HarvVideoAudioStuff Not to be outdone, I believe I quadrupled down.
@HarvVideoAudioStuffАй бұрын
😂
@stagemediaАй бұрын
Level matching…….?
@ssserotonin13733 ай бұрын
The volt sounds like an orange product to me and also the compressor adds way too much noise and overall some love it but I don't like that volt 276 much prefer ssl 2 or Apollo Twin I would bake it
@BubbleWrapPerson3 ай бұрын
This is annoying. The Volt sounds better to me, but the layout of the SSL works so much better for me.
@christantonugroho8018Ай бұрын
SSL pretty bright clean sound. UA color a bit (in a good way), add more body & punch to the sound with still clean sound. I pick UA
@user-gh9iw1of2y20 күн бұрын
There is no fight. SSL12 is just better.
@HarrysoundАй бұрын
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.