Has Intel Finally Caught Up? - Core Ultra 7 256V VS AI 300

[@tenow]

I would have dropped XE naming, first gen was a disaster with drivers that never got any better. I bought a handheld 3 years ago with Intel XE and it was miserable up until games started requiring DX12 full support and refused to run altogether. While both Vega8 and later 680m were perfectly fine.

[@solcraftdev]

First gen as in Iris Xe MAX?

[@tenow]

@@solcraftdev not that far back :) I meant 11th gen CPUs with XE on board like 1165g7 and 1135g7

[@notCAMD]

Talking about those CPUs sounds like a wordsoup

[@NTWA123]

Should be testing the ultra 9 288v against the AI 9, not the 256v. Better you and cpu. This doesn't really make sense

[@dankmemes3153]

Theres no 288v laptop yet tho 😢 cant find a single offering.

[@michaelfitzgerald5207]

They are priced the same so it makes total sense...ASUS is offering "this" with these specs for "this" price and for comparison here is the ASUS AMD offering at the same price point.

[@NTWA123]

@dankmemes3153 yes there is, stop spreading misinformation. Msi 13 ai+

[@dankmemes3153]

@@NTWA123 link it then tough guy. There are currently no offerings available right now for purchase in the US for 288V laptops. There are only 258V versions. I just went to msi’s estore, click on retailers and online shops tor the 288v version, there are none listed.

[@JD4fun]

Also, omnibook ultra flip

[@ktvx.94]

It would be nice if you could limit the RAM and power to be the exact same for a more fair comparison. Also Lunar Lake is supposed to be significantly better at lower wattages, so maybe that's where Intel got their "16% better performance". Still, it's great to have competition in the laptop space (unlike desktop CPU...).

[@michaelfitzgerald5207]

They are priced the same, that is why they are compared with one another.

[@Donivar]

​@@michaelfitzgerald5207They are prices the same for that brand and model. We are interested in actual performance in the same conditions to make educated choices when other laptops with the same chips come out.

[@AG17AG]

on the left-hand side Why they put intel in red and AMD in blue it’s a bit weird

[@VygoOG]

Seems promising!

[@fico1557]

wtf is your youtube??

[@Lord0x]

is this a bot?

[@notCAMD]

Bto

[@notCAMD]

Bot

[@fico1557]

nah i just did some ressearch this is funny af i cant wait for a 3h mystery investigation video about you

[@dungeonlord]

i'm glad to see the new chips are greatly increasing integrated graphics, but those names both amd and intel have chosen are horrible.

[@BreeHorsfall]

I think the battery life differences is what will sell one or the other to me. 😅😌

[@tadmikowsky7520]

It's neat to see that Intel is still doing things. I mean, I'm not gonna buy the things, but I like that they keep doing the things. 🤔 Anyways, most useless comment of the day goes to me I guess

[@pankothompson5903]

might aswell wait for Strix Halo

[@shryko]

this gives me hope for the battlemage GPUs that might come out this season... though I'm not expecting a big future for them.

[@estebanguerrero682]

Thank you for this analysis!! 5:01 Neopets goes hard!

[@sykopro]

Unrelated to the debate. Tell your friends at SilverStone that we want the SLP-01 case here in the US as well.

[@BhargavGadekar69]

*5:50** SKIBIDI TOILET MENTIONED* 🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣

[@matkeyboard8054]

Meanwhile lunar lake becomes the odd child with MOP design.. lets hope next version can catching up with its efficiency

[@RobloxianX]

Strix Halo is going to destroy both of these. But we all know that the M4 Max has the best iGPU. 4080 speeds while still kneecapped in macOS, respect for the engineers

[@TheRickJames]

Honestly 11% is significant when your already barely scraping by.... 1% lows have double the perceived impact vs raw data.

[@beegman27]

4:16 why are there lines connecting the data points on this graph? those are discrete data for different systems: the lines would suggest to me that they are related data for a given system through time

[@ZSchrink]

The way I was reading it was that it was more of a convenience to see whether it was a big difference between two categories or a small one. Sometimes the dots are so close it looks like they're roughly horizontal, but with the line, it does make it easier to see if it's going up or down even by 30 or 40 points. I'm aware that the numbers exist, but just from a rough glance without having to read things, it gives that data for the small differences easily. That said, I do agree with the sentiment of your message. Disparate data shouldn't be connected.

[@NicolasChapadosGirard]

Well done sir and Madam. Hope the cpu and GPU start to compete on the side of energy consumption more.

[@kungfool69]

These cut away shots of Kyler, Omg I should t be laughing like this while eating my lunch at work on my break (bretfast?)

[@prct1234]

Can you test it with minecraft please ?

[@FangerZero]

Nice Stadia controller you got there sir. lol I have mine still too glad they unlocked it for BT. And dude neopets still exists? lol

[@arcamdomain]

When the 16 core 40 cu beast arrives, then the answer to the caption question is a resounding No!

[@Meridian2]

How the tables have turned....

[@subramaniamchandrasekar1397]

There is a difference when saying "(880) is only Ten % faster vs wow Tennn % faster"

[@ufopulse]

AMD has had a staggering architectural lead in COD performance for many years now so this lunar lake part falling behind is nothing new here....

[@blueforce9269]

I really want to hear about battle mage!!!!!

[@jazzmanworkz]

Microwave make that food useless

[@SelimDolu]

okay now we are asking "Has Intel Finally Caught Up?" it was used to be has amd caught up

[@purpAstro]

2:22 Brett - Hey, fella! Are you hungry? My fata$$ - *Y E S*

[@大支爺]

Great! Intel is the best! Thanks I will get AI HX 395 as soon as it released. lol

[@adamek9750]

shame they cost an arm and a leg

[@Dornick_]

bruh, the new cpu names suck

[@Kristjan687]

no

[@hamzahuner3822]

I hope Intel comes back to prime!

[@lloydc5736]

While realizing this was a day or so ago, couldn't believe your tittle, 'The 9800X3D Goes Boom', both were due to the CPU not being installed correctly on two MSI Tomahawk MB, which many of your viewers advised , sad to see you had to use that title of 'The 9800X3D Goes Boom' to draw viewers, be it AMD or Intel, or for that matter brands of GPU's is both sad to see, and wrong!, been a long time subscriber and to capitalize like these two random issues, both that happened on Tomahawk MB's is causing me to consider un-scribing,, as while I take tech KZbinrs with a grain of salt, like to believe they don't to capitalize on misleading tittles to capture viewer's attention!

[@AnirudhTammireddy]

Good on you. Me being a hypocrite subscribe to remind myself of the UFD deals section.

[@NTWA123]

Lunar lake is the best architecture of 2024

[@mikebertolini120]

Yes and no it's great for low to mid end but it's limited by low corcount and low pwr package

[@AyaWetts]

Overall... no, the M4 blows it away. If you are talking x86 compatible, its iffy.

[@lazynolifegamer]

@@AyaWetts m4 is too expensive

[@itsmilan4069]

​@@AyaWettsif it's not perfectly compatible then it's not way near the best

[@AyaWetts]

@@itsmilan4069 compatible with what? yeah Intel and AMD aren't compatible with the M4 so they suck...?

[@maroosagaming]

intel is for those who want 250w winter heaters

[@NotMrToast]

Not anymore

[@TheHipClip]

You know that we're talking about laptop architectures here, right? 250W is the power consumption of a whole laptop, with most of it being the GPU. At least watch the video before you bash Intel. This is coming from someone who bought a 9800x3d, so yes I prefer AMD

[@thetheoryguy5544]

You living under a rock?

[@itsmilan4069]

tell me you didn't watch the video without telling you...

[@maroosagaming]

been bashing intel since 5800x3d, switched from 7800X3D to 9800X3D because i like to be top

[@itsmilan4069]

I don't get it are content creators paid by AMD or have they turned all stupid at same time like comparing U7 with AI9 while acknowledging the difference in power at the beginning is not only nonsensical but it's also pain and simple dumb 🤦🏽‍♂️ like bruh why? *WHY?*

[@christopherjaya342]

They are priced similarly.

[@JohnWilliams-gy5yc]

At this price, just buy the 16GB 256Gb M4 $599 and a portable monitor.

[@大支爺]

For web bowsering? lol

[@brandonchan5620]

you're watching a video about gaming benchmarks. Macs are not ideal for gaming.

[@drewnewby]

@brandonchan5620 For months prior to launch they were claiming the M4 was going to be 4060 fast. Now that it's out, they're still in the comments claiming 3060. At $599 USD, it's a dead heat with $350 780M systems, ignoring all the compatibility layer issues that is...

[@JohnWilliams-gy5yc]

@@drewnewby Yes, you can find 7840HS TSMC N4 around $370 but it's barebone. M4 iGPU rated 4.26 TFLOPS FP32 which is slightly better than 12CU 780M. Of course, one can argue they can go with 7840HS with a little cheaper but M4 CPU side is way better if you don't need more than 16 GB ram.

[@drewnewby]

@JohnWilliams-gy5yc They're not bare-bones, but nice try. You cannot compare FLOPs between different architectures, amateur hour, do research. I've already compiled results from multiple sites and channels. The base M4 has great single core performance, but is behind the 7840HS in multicore and iGPU performance. There wasn't enough die space on the SoC for more, even at 3 nm. Do not expect the 16 GB to be enough, it's "unified" aka shared. Not good for any app or game on compatibility layer, which is most. Single core benchmarks, and Metal based tests are really confusing you guys, it's a shame.

[@nika_251]

That 16% stat should be illegal to advertise

[@camdustin9164]

The 256V has less RAM and slower clocks than the 288V. There are benchmarks by that show the 268V is actually neck and neck with the 890m at 30w, there is no doubt the 288v can reach within 5% of the 16% they claim

[@itsmilan4069]

nah comparing 256V instead of 288V then saying it doesn't matter should be illegal to upload

[@Qvor-u3p]

Wow

[@legendalex8391]

Wow