Haydn: Symphony No. 104 in D major "London" (with Score)

[@tony_the_cactus]

i played this at a concert yesterday, it's the most fun i've ever had playing a concert in my life

[@Nico27901]

What instrument

[@m4l4ch1_]

@@Nico27901we’ll never know 😔

[@acevaptsarov8410]

@@m4l4ch1_ hahahaha

[@sebastianalcaraz2382]

At the beginning sounds like beethoven's 9th symphony, amazing. Definitely a huge source of a great ideas

[@user-fk4fn3vn3f]

Whenever I listen to this marvelous symphony, I imagine if Haydn could have written more symphonies, what they would sound. His last symphony is full of genius motives, unexpected progress of harmony and balanced length of each parts. I really miss theml

[@leoperarm]

If I remember correctly it was Robbins Landon who proposed to regard his latter Piano Trios and Masses as natural continuations of Haydn’s symphonic work; as if he just “moved on” to those media towards the end of his life.

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

@@leoperarm The idea of the masses as choral symphonies originated I think with HCRL, and has been picked up by others since; the piano trios having been heavily promoted by Charles Rosen in The Classical Style (1971) are an entirely separate and unrelated matter.

[@danlokshin]

It would sound like Prokofiev's first symphony 😊

[@myfkaaa]

Викторина Мурова I ч. 0:03 - Вступление 2:27 - Главная партия 2:52 - Связующая партия 3:20 - Побочная партия №1 (на материале ГП) 4:03 - Побочная партия №2 4:13 - Заключительная партия II ч. 9:40 - Основная тема 13:35 - Эпизод (g-moll - B-dur) III ч. 19:20 - Основная тема («крестьянская») 21:14 - Трио (B-dur) IV ч. 24:35 - Главная партия (чешская) 24:59 - Связующая партия 25:19 - Побочная партия №1 25:45 - Побочная партия №2 26:02 - Заключительная партия

[@Elsie.Furman]

1 часть: 2:27 - ГП 3:20 - 1ПП 3:59 - 2ПП 6:25 - Разработка 2 часть: 9:40 - Начало 13:35 - Эпизод в d moll 3 часть: 19:20 - Начало 21:14 - Трио 4 часть: 24:33 - ГП 25:19 - ПП 25:45 - Сдвиг 28:01 - Разработка

[@trumpetme7588]

1. daļa: 0:00 - Ievads 2:27 - GP 3:19 - BP 6:25 - Izstrādajums 7:42 - Reprīze 2. daļa: 9:40 - A 13:35 - B 3. daļa: 19:20 - Pamattēma 4. daļa: 24:33 - GP 25:45 - BP

[@user-xq1tg7xx4v]

1 часть 00:00 - Вступление 02:27 - ГП 2 часть 09:40 - осн. тема 3 часть 19:20 - Менуэт 21:13 - Трио 4 часть 24:33 - ГП

[@user-qd8ek1dt5j]

Всем удачи на викторине)

[@Bucky58]

Marvelous symphony ❤️

[@thomashall4683]

This is one of my A level set works!!!

[@PretzelPunch]

cry about it

[@thomashall4683]

@@PretzelPunch Why?

[@sphoenix7156]

@@PretzelPunch its a good piece lol

[@PretzelPunch]

@@sphoenix7156 shut it nerdoid

[@PresenceToriyama]

Yes, the Great London!

[@GeorgReitlinger]

Ich mag so sehr die Klassiker von Wien. Haydn, Mozart und Beethoven waren der Anfang neuer Ära in der Musik.

[@armandssurins3364]

1.Satz 0:03 (0:04) - Einleitung 2:27 (4:25) - Hauptsatz 3:20 (5:19) - Nebensatz 6:25 - Durchfuehrung 6:33 - "unendliches Kanon" 6:40 - forte, No.4 6:48 - cis moll 7:00 - forte, No.5 7:41 - Reprise (Hauptsatz) 7:51 - Holzblaeser (!) 8:38 -> 8:45 - Nebensatz 2.Satz 9:40 (10:05) - Hauptthena 13:35 - mittlere Strukture (g moll) 13:47 - subito fortissimo 14:28 - Falschreprise (B dur) 15:14 - Reprise 3.Satz 19:20 - Меnuett 20:03 -> 20:17 - Pause (!) 21:13 - Тrio 23:21 - Reprise (da Capo) 4.Satz 24:32 (26:18) - Hauptsatz 25:45 (27:30) - Nebensatz 28:00 - Durchfuehrung 29:08 -> 29:10 - Reprise

[@yobene]

Спасибо

[@acevaptsarov8410]

It boggles the mind that Haydn outlived Mozart and this piece for instance was written 4 entire years after Mozart's passing... Wild!

[@celloplaysmusic7330]

21:16 the trio begins here yes

[@MosunmolaSunday]

the consert was great.

[@elisaberthet3746]

INTRO 0:04 homo 1:44 dissonance retard 1:57 homo EXPO 2:27 TA 2:44 pont p f 3:20 TB 3:59 GTB2 DEV 6:26 motif TA 6:50 dev GTB2 7:30 montée chroma vl épique REXP 7:43 TA 7:59 pont 8:32 rapel motif TA developpé puis silence 8:42 TB à la tonique sans conséquent 9:04 GTB2 I) ANALYSE a) forme 2:27 TA 3:20 TB Suspension de carrure : 3:20 à partir de TB Formule cadentiel 3x1mesure 2:44 Pont 2x2mesures et 1x2 mesures b) HARMONIE 3:29 TB V/V 3:47 V/V puis pédale dominante 1:44 fin intro dissonance retard

[@jakoblandry]

Potential publishing error at 12:22. In the last measure of the system, off-beat of beat one, the score shows the second violins playing “mi” when in fact in the audio the violins are playing “re.”

[@Maish7]

thank you for this!

[@pennythecatsalt4154]

excerpt timestamps 0:00 (1) 14:28 (2) 29:06 (3)

[@catisbread6551]

2:28 9:40 13:46 violin lvl 9 orchestral excerpt

[@sorcyboi2848]

6:26 - Development of 1st mvt

[@cardbordbox13ilovethebeege63]

The second movement 🔥🔥🔥

[@noellerhee463]

for me: 2:43 allegro 15:15 andante

[@petercrosland5502]

Wonderful, although for me, trying to follow score was 20 steps too far. My quill pen better left on the goose.

[@myaaaaao]

0:00 F.J.Haydn Symphony No.104 in d major 1nd

[@Xyriak]

Quantity over quality

[@jamie65078]

FUCK MUSIC A LEVEL

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Someone capable of writing a comment such as yours should not be studying music at A level.

[@jamie65078]

@@elaineblackhurst1509 I agree

[@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463]

What an interesting viewpoint

[@christianwouters6764]

​I find this the absolutely best Haydn symphony. The splitting of the first 4 bars of the theme in two and using the 2 parts as elements for the whole development section is sheer Genius .​ I agree with another comment that the 2d movement is taken to slowly.@@elaineblackhurst1509

[@Kyubiwan]

At the beginning I thought it was Beethoven's 9th...

[@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463]

oh!

[@philippedesaint-martin4815]

Les symphonies de Haydn sont magnifiques, cependant pour cette version le second mouvement est trop lent. Il est marqué Andante, ce mot vient de l'italien "andiamo", que l'on pourrait traduire par "allons", les Andante sont sont plutôt relativement rapides.

[@60bui]

Sinceramente, ho eseguito questa Sinfonia qualche anno fa, conosco decine di esecuzioni, questa è tra le più equilibrate, so chi tiene tempi più stretti nell'andante, il movimento ci croma è abbastanza giusto così, altrimenti si perde la cantabilità, io stesso ho tenuto un tempo simile

[@kevinye1041]

6:26 13:35

[@osmy4767]

0:05 вступление

[@MVargabass]

Why is 30:50 a D minor chord?

[@marianmrazik9813]

7:05

[@nomaybeyes5681]

2:27

[@rebeccadewald9449]

14:26

[@MrSpyfelis]

Isn't this piece actually in F Major?, I know that the title says D Major, but, I don't see any 2 sharps(which is either D Major or B minor) at the beginning of the piece, I only see 1 flat(which is either F Major or D minor)

[@themobiusfunction]

D Major with an introduction in the minor key

[@aldiewboo6299]

It’s in d major, the intro is in d minor until the end of the intro, it uses a neopolitan 6th chord (in this case Eb major) and then a 6/4 cadence to modulate to the tonic major! Fascinating stuff

[@JJC333]

I think this piece sounds like a porto-beethoven symphony.

[@paulwl3159]

Or Beethoven sounds like late Haydn

[@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463]

oh!

[@kimye0825]

17:39

[@luisdiogenys2105]

6:59

[@user-hm6jo2oe7h]

I,IV

[@emwri8685]

4:27

[@viv8131]

8:30

[@osmy4767]

29:19

[@giovannicossu430]

C'è già molto Beethoven in Haydn?

[@hazhoner5727]

C'è Haydn in Beethoven

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

@@hazhoner5727 Concordo in pieno con quello che ha detto.

[@proarte4081]

Naturalmente c'è molto Haydn in Beethoven dato che J. Haydn è stato il maestro di Beethoven nei primi anni 90 del 700. Esiste una differenza nettissima tra le prime composizioni di Beethoven del periodo di Bonn e le successive composizioni viennesi scritte dopo aver studiato con Haydn... le prime composizioni del periodo di Bonn pur essendo gradevoli, non avevano quella solida architettura e quell'equilibrio nella forma tipici delle composizioni di Beethoven successive. Queste caratteristiche sono l'insegnamento più importante, fondamentale, che l'anziano grande maestro Haydn fece al giovane Beethoven, da allora il genio creativo di Beethoven esplose senza limiti, proprio perché solidamente inquadrato nella struttura formale haydniana, che è quella che noi conosciamo anche sotto il nome di classicismo viennese.

[@tringhiacomposemusic6075]

last symphony of haydn

[@jkim-08]

didn’t he write 108? i could be wrong though

[@tringhiacomposemusic6075]

@@jkim-08 yeah, he just write 104 symphonies!

[@klop4228]

@@jkim-08 4 of those are arguable. I forget what they all are, but I think one's a "symphonia concertante", and the others are similarly "almost-but-not-quite symphonies"

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

@@klop4228 For your benefit, and others sharing random thoughts here, I offer the following guidance. Haydn wrote 107 symphonies. Hob. I:1-104 are the familiar numbered symphonies. Hob. I:106 is the three movement sinfonia to Le pescatrici. Hob. I:107 is Symphony ‘A’. Hob. I:108 is Symphony ‘B’. The missing Hob. I:105 is the Sinfonia concertante.

[@emwri8685]

13:48

[@camiladelgadillo1467]

2:27

[@kimye0825]

8:16

[@seanhartman11]

14:49

[@HannahSueKim]

2:27

[@diary202]

2:28

[@Hourmongous]

2:27