Haydn: Symphony No. 103 in E-flat major "Drumroll" (with Score)

[@vetapoly]

I часть в сонатной форме 0:07 Вступление 2:49 Главная партия 3:46 Побочная партия 5:54 Разработка 7:07 Реприза. Главная партия 7:38 Побочная партия 8:24 Coda II часть, медленная 9:30 1-я тема 11:28 2-я тема III часть Менуэт 20:07 тема Менуэта IV часть финал 24:50 Золотой ход валторн 24:56 Главная партия финала 26:08 Побочная партия финала

[@musicmu946]

спасибо!

[@МатронаКучеренко]

Благодарю от всей души, вы спасли жизнь десятерым людям.

[@Olga6328]

0:05 - 1ч. Вступ Es 2:48 - 1 ч. ГП Es 3:46 - 1ч. ПП B 5:26 - 1ч. РБ, ГП 5:54 - 1ч. РБ, тема вступу 9:31 - 2 ч. 1 т. c 11:27 -2ч., 2 т. С 20:06 - 3 ч. ОТ Es 22:12 - 3ч. тріо Es 24:48 - 4ч. ГП Es (на початку "золотий хід валторн") 26:21 - 4ч. ПП B

[@nekulturaoff]

Вторая часть: 1. Первая тема до минор- 9:30 2. Вторая тема до мажор- 11:27 3. Первая тема 1 вариация- 13:09 4. Вторая тема 1 вариация- 14:25 5. Первая тема 2 вариация- 16:17 6. Вторая тема 2 вариация- 17:33 7. Кода

[@moderato1985]

І частина, сонатне allegro Es-dur 0:05 - 1ч., Вступ с-Es 🥁 2:48 - 1 ч., експозиція, ГП Es-dur 🎻 3:16 - 1ч., експозиція, СП 3:46 - 1ч., експозиція, ПП B-dur 🎻 3:58 - 1ч., експозиція, ЗП B-dur Експозиція повторюється двічі. Потім звучить розробка. 5:26 - 1ч., розробка (РБ), тема ГП 5:54 - 1ч., РБ, тема вступу 6:21 - 1ч., РБ, ГП 6:42 - 1ч., РБ, ПП 7:07 - 1ч., реприза (РП) - ГП Es-dur 7:37 - 1ч., РП, ПП Es-dur 8:10, 1ч., Coda, тема вступу, потім елемент ГП ІІ частина, подвійні варіації c-moll 9:31 - 2 ч., 1 тема c-moll 🎻 11:27 - 2ч., 2 тема С-dur 🎻 Потім звучать варіації на ці теми. ІІІ ч. Менует Es-dur, складна тричастинна форма АВА 20:06 - 3 ч., основна тема (ОТ) Es-dur 🎻 22:12 - 3ч., тріо (середина) Es-dur 🎻 24:22 - ОТ Es-dur ІV ч. Фінал Es-dur. Рондо-сонатна форма. 24:48 - 4ч., ГП Es-dur (на початку теми - золотий хід валторн) 📯 26:21 - 4ч., ПП B-dur (ПП побудована на темі ГП)

[@lucamohr7158]

**** u

[@kriiiiisa]

Святой человек

[@Olga6328]

Анно Миколаївно, простіть, я використала Ваш матеріал для коменту вище, але значно спростила його, щоб було легше. Просто верхній комент лежить вгорі, його легше знайти, я хочу, щоб дітям було легше його бачити і слухати відповідно. ЦІлком солідаризуюся з нижнім (чи верхнім) коментарем. Ви - свята людина. Дякую.

[@moderato1985]

Ольга Іванівна, дякую за таку високу оцінку мого скромного коментаря :) Буду рада, якщо вашим студентам теж допоможе!

[@nekulturaoff]

Первая часть: 1. Вступление- 0:00 2. Экспозиция, главная партия- 2:49 3. Экспозиция, связующая партия- 3:17 4. Экспозиция, побочная партия в си бемоль мажоре- 3:46 5. Экспозиция, повторяется 6. Разработка- 5:26 7. Разработка, побочная партия в ре бемоль мажоре- 6:42 8. Реприза, главная партия- 7:07 9. Реприза, побочная партия в ми бемоль мажоре- 7:37 10. Кода- 8:12

[@elina172]

Spasibo!!!

[@requieem2802]

I really like this Sinfonie, especially the third movement and the dies irae theme of the first movement. Haydns Menuetts are really cool!

[@strawberrymilk3783]

0:00 introduction exposition 2:48 subject 1 3:00 transition 3:46 subject 2 development 5:27 process 1 5:54 process 2 6:44 process 3 recapitulation 7:06 first subject 7:19 transition 7:37 second subject section 8:13 coda

[@Bucky58]

Best performance of the symphony. The whole set by Sir Colin Davis is excellent 👍

[@Gay-u3t]

0:05 - 1ч. Вступ Es 2:48 - 1 ч. ГП Es 3:46 - 1ч. ПП B 9:31 - 2 ч. 1 т. минорная тема 11:27 -2ч., 2 т. мажорная тема 20:06 - 3 ч. менуэт Es 22:12 - 3ч. трио Es 24:48 - 4ч. ГП Es (зхв)

[@Anigmus_]

This absolute beast of a man wrote 106 symphonies. Bro....

[@Adair9800]

Thanks for posting this. So great to listen to, and soon play on my horn.

[@tomgriffiths9508]

0:00 - Introduction 2:48 - Subject 1 3:46 - Subject 2 5:26 - Process 1 5:54 - Process 2 6:44 - Process 3

[@joshuagerthoffer2321]

That menuetto was so dramatic and sad sounding. Love it and Haydn.

[@Elsie.Furman]

1 часть: 0:05 - Вступление 2:48 - ГП 3:46 - ПП 3:58 - Заключительная 5:27 - Разработка 9:02 - Кода 2 часть: 9:31 - 1 Тема в миноре 11:27 - 2 Тема в Мажоре 3 часть: 20:06 - Начало 22:12 - Трио 4 часть: 24:48 - ГП 26:20 - ПП

[@Diisney]

❤

[@SuperAbisal]

Великолепно !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Спасибо .

[@m.zn_11]

0:29 symphony no. 1 Beethoven

[@thomasrengel5577]

At the very last moment, after he had fully orchestrated this symphony, Haydn CUT seven bars of a modulation into C-Flat very close to the end. The music is in the score book Haydn sent to the copyists and engravers--the British Museum has the original which I saw displayed in 1995 with the book open to the page with this cut. H. C. Robbins Landon laments Haydn's cut--but I think Haydn made The Right Choice as that C-Flat modulation spoiled the movement's flow. Antal Dorati recorded the version without this cut. Argue about this! Also wonder why Haydn used clarinets only in the OUTER movements of #103? The manuscript of #104 shows clarinets only in the first movement--there IS a moment where they stand out if one is listening; someone else created the clarinet parts for the other movements and they're deliberately NOT prominent. The clarinet parts in #101 are NOT by Haydn but the publisher got Haydn's approval to use them and there they stand..

[@beethovenlovedmozart]

Haydn challenged the norms in instrumentation. That's where Beethoven got it from

[@frederickthegreat4801]

Hi😢was sobering up at Susan’s house or pad sharer like the Ubers

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Some interesting thoughts, and presented accurately; I would offer two observations. Firstly, that the excised passage in C flat was probably removed by Haydn for similar reasons to him cutting a similarly bizarre modulation that took him to B sharp in the Andantino e cantabile movement of Symphony 42; over the crossed-out passage, Haydn wrote: ‘That was for much too learned ears’. Secondly, regarding the clarinets, I think the sparing and not very adventurous parts in the later ‘London’ symphonies are simply a reflection of the quality of the players; I don’t think at the time they were as good as the clarinet players in Vienna, and Haydn simply didn’t trust them.

[@graeme011]

Excellent performance from the trombone players!

[@nicholasfox966]

There are no trombones in this symphony. Perhaps your confusion is 'trombe'. This is Italian for "trumpets".

[@loganfruchtman953]

The first movement is like a precursor to Rossini’s la gazza Ladra overture

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Rossini spent an inordinate amount of time and trouble studying the works of Mozart and Haydn; given that, your comment makes much sense.

[@mefodiasche]

24:40 финал

[@vizmaanna644]

I daļas g.p. (no 2:49) I daļas bl.p. (no 3:47) II daļas 1. tēma (no 9:31) II daļas 2. tēma (no 11:27)

[@skinnynuggetsmith1003]

3:01 7:19 3:04 7:24

[@IAmDylanPowers]

Is it just me, or does the theme with the horns at the beginning of the finale sound like Haydn's trumpet concerto also in the same key?

[@LeonoraBassisty104]

I noticed it too

[@pietrozuffa4718]

2:49 Quite similar to the Ouverture from "La Cambiale Di Matrimonio" by Rossini.

[@beethovenlovedmozart]

The simple, yet dark melodies that usually have dissonance is a trademark of Haydn. He has the same talent of Beethoven imo. Both of them had to turn to simple melodies and unique instrumentation to make up for their other shortcomings in melody, and the ability to seemlessly transition to other themes. Mozart had the melody, and harmony transition part down, but he had to learn from Haydn how to add more dissonance and power of instrumentation. Challenging the norms and going lower and higher as Beethoven later ran with and started Romanticism. If Mozart and Haydn were one man, he wouldve paved the way for Romanticism.

[@classicalmusic210]

Actually, Haydn is considerably less dissonant in harmony (in terms of inner voices) than, not just Mozart, but also his German contemporaries, Michael Haydn, Franz Ignaz Beck, Franz Ignaz von Beecke, Franz Joseph Aumann, Pasterwitz, etc. (Look up on Google: "Instances of Academics Not Being Reliable (Regarding Music History and Other Things)." for the explanation.) There are no series of "7th, 9th chords" formed from dissonances of the inner lines, for one thing. Haydn is among the happiest-sounding of his contemporaries.

[@pdqbach4552]

Haydn is considerably less dissonant in harmony (in terms of inner voices) than, not just Mozart, but also his German contemporaries, Michael Haydn, Franz Ignaz Beck, Franz Ignaz von Beecke, Franz Joseph Aumann, Pasterwitz, etc. Consult "Instances of Academics Not Being Reliable (Regarding Music History and Other Things)." There are no series of "7th, 9th chords" formed from dissonances of the inner lines. Haydn is among the happiest-sounding of his contemporaries.

[@pdqbach4552]

+ Anton Schweitzer, Johann Friedrich Reichardt

[@valerietaylor9615]

Happy, but never dull. That’s very rare.

[@danidiaz5766]

😂😂😂

[@reardoor]

16:18.. 9:30 (For myself)

[@tigger3496]

17:04 why timpani is using alto clef lol

[@aurelijjj]

24:50 J.Haidns - 103.simfonija: 4.d. g.p.

[@jeffreyemge5435]

20'06" Example 4-9 (time stamp below is inaccurate)

[@gaydvorak7053]

2:49 Allegro 1st movement

[@apnenraova3323]

1 раздел 20:05 трио 22:13

[@jeffreyemge5435]

24'29" Example I-5 (time stamps below are inaccurate)

[@edith.sam1]

Concertmaster solo - 15:53

[@osmy4767]

27:53 разработка

[@boranmert4587]

29:42

[@ridelhouse]

3:57

[@swinger9374]

Is this the longest symphony composed by Haydn?

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Symphony 54 has an Adagio assai movement that lasts about 18 minutes; this pushes the whole symphony - with repeats - to over 35 minutes making it probably the longest. Otherwise, it depends on whether or not repeats are taken, and the different conductors’ tempi. Symphony 103 is probably the longest of the ‘London’ symphonies, and yes, it’s one of the longest of all Haydn’s symphonies.

[@christianwouters6764]

I find the first movement the weaker of the four. The whole piece is not helped by a sluggish and unsubtle orchestra. Is it and old recording? It sounds definetedly so.

[@warfarezenit4170]

Fucking Ads!!!!

[@lucamohr7158]

the bigest sh*** of the world

Shut up then

Your opinion and shit is almost the same thing.

[@Ballerheiko]

lol, ich hoffe dein Gehirn (und dein Englisch) entwickelt sich noch etwas.

[@phismint2430]

u probably listen to npc artists like taylor swift or harry styles🤡😊

[@lucamohr7158]

Nope I’m hearing I do it over and over again -in my head

[@lucamohr7158]

i hate this song (is it a?)

[@noehatpopcorn]

Luca bist du es😂

[@lucamohr7158]

Ja aus der 6d

[@frederikaamelijalimana8599]

Is no a song is a piece

[@Moon-ew4iw]

SAMEEEEE

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

A song has words. Song in English = canzone (Italian), chanson (French), lied (German), cancion (Spanish), et cetera. Johnny Cash wrote songs, The Beatles wrote songs, Justin Bieber…

[@Olga6328]

0:05 - 1ч. Вступ Es 2:48 - 1 ч. ГП Es 3:46 - 1ч. ПП B 5:26 - 1ч. РБ, ГП 5:54 - 1ч. РБ, тема вступу 9:31 - 2 ч. 1 т. c 11:27 -2ч., 2 т. С 20:06 - 3 ч. ОТ Es 22:12 - 3ч. тріо Es 24:48 - 4ч. ГП Es (на початку "золотий хід валторн") 26:21 - 4ч. ПП B