(Hearthstone) Renathal Showdown: Priest VS Death Knight

[@kristophercornwell5825]

Kibler back at it, singlehandedly making me want to play Priest again. Great content as always, much appreciated for all you do. 😊

[@alaron5698]

Kibler looks a lot like Arcturus Mengsk from Starcraft - the old one. Not the cutscene Mengsk, but the image of him in the briefings prior to missions.

[@SimonOhNo]

How the heck does the deck-code keep going outside of the video description making it unable to copy? Wat

[@hugosantosa8545]

This game proved the wand nerf is absolutely justified XD

[@mir8651]

It was garbage design anyways. Just adding more random to a game already full of it with no counterplay either.

[@xTobsecretx]

Kibler today brought to you by one of my favorite pieces highlighted in Your Lie in April.

[@AV32985]

1:10 Out of curiosity, what is it that happens when your editor removes a second or two of footage? I was so sure that you had missed an attack with your Dirty Rat, but it looks like the part where your Dirty Rat attacked into their Dirty Rat was edited out.

[@Carl-nr8uf]

Kibler showed his nipples on stream so the editor had to cut out that part of the vod.

[@SielAzur]

it's usually because it takes him time to think for the optimal play for his turn so a lot of the times those edits begin at the start of his round and usually ends up when we see the rope

[@habron3495]

Kibler pulled up his shirt to show his nipples, think they had to cut it out to put it on youtube

[@habron3495]

.

[@gmyrek31]

thats not how ,,shuffle,, works

[@Wexelent]

You know I ran code to see what the chance would be right? Like I'm not just talking out my neck. Based on the RNG/Fisher-Yates system, your probability of drawing the same card twice in a deck or 32 cards after shuffling twice could possibly be in the range of 0.0001% or less. Anyone who wants to argue differently argues from the base premise that Team 5 weights their card biases in the RNG, which is the exact interaction making HS feel really really bad. But that's cool, I'll see my way out of your comments. Clearly facts aren't welcome here which is why my last one was removed.

[@saoudsaoud9215]

It doesn’t shuffle your deck it just shuffles the card into your deck

[@BasHearthYT]

Wouldnt it just be (1/32) * (1/32) ?

[@mangobuster2460]

Nobody cares mate, "I'll see myself out" lmao

[@wertzler]

Holy touch grass

[@LuXoR330]

Its 50/50 tho

[@drjuicephd9223]

The way hearthstone is coded there is no way that Kiblers cards got shuffled. The odds are infinitesimally low for reno to be on top after two shuffles

[@ajy0h_]

The number of shuffles doesn't matter if each one is basically just a full reset, the probability of Reno (or any card) ending up on top will just be 1 / however many cards were left in the deck. Which isn't high but not so impossibly low as to be able to confidently claim a lack of shuffling (or a non-uniform shuffling method).

[@Wexelent]

@@ajy0h_ You do not know math... The simple and only answer is that the game mechanic for interaction said, "You have high value card, you get to play high value card for fun" and that is the exact mechanic that is fucking up HS. It takes about 2 seconds to learn that the probability of drawing the same card twice but knowing its the top card 3 times, after a perfect riffle shuffle is so unrealistically low that it is practically incomprehensible. Please stop shilling for Blizzard my guy.

[@drjuicephd9223]

@@ajy0h_ that's true. But it does merit further investigation. The odds are still low with how many cards were left in the deck.

[@martianinvader3828]

There were 33 cards in the deck. The odds were 1 in 33, or just over 3%.

[@drjuicephd9223]

@@martianinvader3828 Yup. Low odds

[@Brope92]

Elite four is harder than hearthstone.