Excellent video. Bergson was such a towering figure in Belle Epoque Europe, but even most philosophy majors don't know much about him!
@kristenzbikowski8625 Жыл бұрын
Well done! You explained a difficult topic very clearly. Thank you.
@ReynaSingh2 жыл бұрын
This channel is great! Keep it up
@CupsAreUseful2 жыл бұрын
WAIT (been a podcast listener for a month and loving it) both of y’all r way more attractive than i visualized. like. across all podcast expectations.
@artlessons12 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Interesting . I was not previously familiar with his work but you have sparked a interest !
@JustinDeRosa2 жыл бұрын
Love the concepts reviewed here. Glad for my poor sketch of a memory.
@roygbiv176 Жыл бұрын
Wow, what a fantastic video!
@simweir2 жыл бұрын
Which Bergson talk does the speaker refer to?
@dharmapalsharma2679 Жыл бұрын
Something, so hilarious 😂 and yet so akin to Practical reality of Life/ Existence 🧐😂🌺
@purpasteur2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating!
@cornutus112 жыл бұрын
Small correction: Plotinus' dates are approximately 205-270 AD, so he was a third-century thinker. Otherwise, great work.
@wonderfacts77822 жыл бұрын
অনেক ধন্যবাদ, প্রফেসর আপনাকে। 😊 এমন আরও ছোট ছোট নানান বিষয়ে আপনার ভিডিও চাই। অপেক্ষায় থাকলাম।ভালো থাকবেন আপনি।
@BillyMcBride2 жыл бұрын
Bergson must have been a great opponent of Descartes.
@BillyMcBride2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this overview video. I also like the plant. It makes me think of those souls from above in Plotinus's theory that jump down, or fall in love, when bodies rise up from nature, like you said. Cool art too.
@pedrova80582 жыл бұрын
Spinoza was that guy
@w000w00t2 жыл бұрын
Extrapolating a dream from light dusk sounds so similar to how AI renders an image out of noise using latent diffusion. :)
@Summer-kb2dm2 жыл бұрын
much to consider here.. of the little I know about Bergson some is compelling - some is not at all. Some is applicable in the context of other theories. Implying or speculating that memories "want" is a little loose of an interpretation. Perhaps if we spoke of valence or in the Freudian sense as unresolved. Perhaps it is far more involved than what is presented here. But to think a memory has it's own "will" gets way to complicated.