I’m more interested in how these designers became the corporate brands they are today. That’s the mystery I haven’t really found the answer to. How you get from Balenciaga’s 1960’s designs to Cardi B admiring the shoes that look like socks? It’s such a departure, and for somebody not really into fashion pretty baffling.
@CG-he1hw3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. It's like listening Pink Floyd in the 2020 with Bad Bunny as leader of the band...
@changeeyecolor38913 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@lemonscenic62073 жыл бұрын
Once founders make a huge company and die, everything turns left. When they started it, we got to see THEIR creativity. It’s not belanciaga’s ideas and he would be in distraught too. But now it feels like fashion tries to be unique and different when fashion artist back then was because of their creativity and using their own lens. Some of these designer fashions are truly ridiculous.
@mckenzie.86533 жыл бұрын
@@lemonscenic6207 you should watch Halston on Netflix! So well done and fascinating. Shows you that designers have allllways been searching for a unique style of their own
@lemonscenic62073 жыл бұрын
@Jay McKenzie Thank you! I will definitely be watching!
@thornandes3 жыл бұрын
it's weird to see someone put Givenchy as in rivalry with Balenciaga, because people who follow the history will know that Givenchy is mentored and loved by Balenciaga. I never see them to be a head to head comparison, instead I always see Givenchy as a protégé of Balenciaga. Thank you for the wonderful video, love your calm and soothing presentation and explanation.
@changeeyecolor38913 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@sterlingross9193 жыл бұрын
It’s unfortunate that people don’t know about how close Givenchy and Balenciaga were. I never think of them as “competitors”. They had similar aesthetics (especially in Balenciaga’s most innovative years in the 60s), but there was a level of austerity in Balenciaga’s work that wasn’t in Givenchy’s.
@rubaidaallen27643 жыл бұрын
They were very, close these two. To say they were competitors is so far from the truth. Balenciaga's work was very austere indeed yes.
@men_del123 жыл бұрын
Hmmm....so basicaly: Balenciaga Fanatics: HE'S THE BEST!!!!!! Givenchy Fanatics: NO, HE'S EVEN BETTER!!!!!! Balenciage & Givenchy from afar: 😑😑😑😑😑😑
@changeeyecolor38913 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@stanrusk25223 жыл бұрын
Respectfully, any aficionado with an 👁 for style and structure should be able to see the close kinship between these two brilliant designers, as so clearly set out in this presentation. Question: Would you consider it worthwhile to discuss the place of Halston in the context of the style of ‘chic and glamorous’ which aforementioned couturiers share? 🕊
@marijacvitanovic42982 жыл бұрын
Of course people know..Same fabric- different style.
@CFinch3603 жыл бұрын
"Having a favorite does not warrant demeaning other people's ideas nor preferences" Well said!
@edwardwiot62653 жыл бұрын
Perhaps it is an urban myth; but I once read that when Balenciaga closed his house, Mrs. Paul (Bunny) Mellon asked him who should do her clothes going forward and Mr. Balenciaga walked her across the street to Givenchy. And a great friendship was formed between Mrs. Mellon and Hubert de Givenchy.
@edwardwiot62653 жыл бұрын
Sorry', I should have begun with mentioning what a fascinating video this is.
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
That story is very much true! Many of the wonderful seamstresses from Balenciaga also went to Givenchy after the house closed.
@iloveyoufor10000years3 жыл бұрын
Very sad that now balenciaga is known to the general public as some "high fashion streetwear" brand :(
@goldenage3233 жыл бұрын
Givenchy as well. Sad times for fashion
@vickypan59723 жыл бұрын
That’s true
@uropy3 жыл бұрын
People don’t care. As long as wearing these brands gave them the advantage/upper hand in social interaction, it’s ok. People buy these to serve their own social purpose.
@Adrianthegreat13 жыл бұрын
@@uropy I buy it cause I like how it looks
@alyssawilberg25353 жыл бұрын
@@uropy because nobody could ACTUALLY enjoy innovative designs and challenging the norm right? I think what ruins fashion is people being so judgey instead of focusing on their own style and what they like.
@remsan033 жыл бұрын
Producing a thoughtful video is difficult--especially one that's thoroughly researched such as this one. On top of that, one that has a nice aesthetic and finely edited. But man... Henry, you've got to make more videos. I'm dying waiting for your new upload!
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
So pleased you enjoyed it, thank you! Stay tuned for more 💙
@remsan033 жыл бұрын
@@henryjjwilkinson Can't wait. You don't know how many times I rewatched your videos just to satisfy my needs... Ok, that sounds weird. But I'm pretty normal otherwise 😂. I guess the reason people want other to agree with their choices is down to getting approval and validation. And I admit, it's nice when people agree with your opinion. It's the press who often pit one another into a rivalry. If things are all peaceful and hunky dory, where's the story in that. And they have a paper to sell.
@changeeyecolor38913 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@gdilemma3 жыл бұрын
Just post a video of you pronouncing his name on a loop “Hubert de Givenchy”.... love it
@orion88353 жыл бұрын
Givenchy was the lighter, smoother, cleaner stricter look with hints of whimsy. Balenciaga ran towards the theatrical featuring a more animated presentation with unusual shapes. Both were highly successful with enormous contribution.
@lapislazuli78764 ай бұрын
You have forgotten to mention that Balenciaga was Spanish and very Roman Catholic. Those two historical tastes heavily influenced his work in ways which were not as present in Givenchy’s œuvre. So yes, Balenciaga was more theatrical because the Spanish just are.
@markusmulder_3 жыл бұрын
Great video. I agree 100%. Whoever states that Givenchy won’t be remembered in the history of fashion must have been born in the nineties or early 2000’s. He was one of the most exquisite creators of the 20th century. Who cares what fashionistas wannabe geniuses opine when in the end Balenciaga himself turned his clients to Givenchy when he retired. Givenchy earned the respect and admiration of Balenciaga and that’s the only opinion that matters. As far as that same fabric used by other designers Givenchy’s take for the Funny Face gown is hands down the most modern and more flattering of them all. Those images at the en of the 1967 Givenchy collection are often featured as Balenciaga’s ironically.
@tara57423 жыл бұрын
Before this video, I only knew the two names as fashion designers that were only relevant to me via their perfumes. I’m in awe. Oh my gosh, and that cape at the end! Even with my fashion ignorant eyes, I’m blown away.
@aledenis68183 жыл бұрын
One small detail : The origin of Cristobal Balenciaga was in Spain not in Paris. Because his mother had a couturier store or something like that in Pais Vasco (Spain) and him from childhood help her. Great video
@veritygazzard72103 жыл бұрын
Oh the joy of wondering if Henry has posted another video and seeing one pop up as fast as the thought it your head!
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
💙💙💙💙
@Boertje2473 жыл бұрын
In 1964, my grandmother, an excellent seamstress, copied from a store window, a white cotton piqué Givenchy dress for me to wear for school promotion. Boat neckline, piped waistline, inverted front pleat on a tulip skirt, all edged with narrow cotton Swiss Venice lace. It was a stunningly simple dress that was so chic and elegant, all for a 12 year old girl! I still have that dress, worn so long ago, which made me feel incredibly sophisticated and grown up. Givenchy designs always framed the person wearing it. His fabrics were flawless, accenting the movement of the wearer. None like him now, when couture is largely a joke.
@dimplesd89313 жыл бұрын
Amazing video. My school teacher African American mom was a huge Givenchy fan. We couldn’t afford Haute Couture but she bought his RTW and wore it like HC. She also made his design at home on her Singer sewing machine. Thank you for a good and warm memory of my “overdressed to teach 1st graders” mother. Thank you for this informative video.
@BrigitteG183 жыл бұрын
2:42 mins in, you are so classy and articulate and your opinions and information are proclaimed with grace. I wish more KZbinrs were as intelligent and respectful as yours 🙏🏼 🇦🇺 xx
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! So pleased you enjoyed it 💙
@AE-nf8nz3 жыл бұрын
fashion lineage is so amazing, to think that giambattista valli who was mentored by ungaro who was then mentored by balenciaga and then you trace their aesthetic and creative tendencies its so fascinating.
@JaesadaSrisuk3 жыл бұрын
Or like how Jean Paul Gaultier was trained by Pierre Cardin, who himself learned the trade of the couturier from Elsa Schiaparelli and later in Christian Dior’s atelier.
@rameyzamora10183 жыл бұрын
One of the gifts Mr Wilkinson kindly gives is to the imagination - I can see myself wearing so many of these exquisite designs! Then the gentle insights of the designers' worlds. I find these videos most interactive, even if the action is all mental.
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful comment to read! So pleased you enjoyed it 💙
@eduardoramirezjr44033 жыл бұрын
You offered a balanced and intelligent perspective on both designers. I personally believe that both gentlemen were genius in their execution, and I cannot say which I prefer more. However, I do have a soft spot for the English-American designer, Charles James. Also, I want to thank you for including Edie Biel Bouvier in this vlog. She had her own idiosyncratic sense style.
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Charles James was just wonderful. Such fascinating shapes and construction techniques! 💙
@MS-kn4tt3 жыл бұрын
I love to hear nuanced, informed viewpoints rather than hyperbolic, oppositional proclamations. This is a beautiful essay. Well done.
@davidraf306711 ай бұрын
I just watched Balenciaga's new TV series on Disney+. Very interesting very very well done and there they refer to this friendship. Personally they are 2 of my favorite couturiers. If poor Balenciaga saw what they do these days with his name. I would go back to the grave.
@henryjjwilkinson11 ай бұрын
I loved the series! The way they portrayed their relationship, and just how much Hubert admired him, was wonderful.
@MrLutens11 ай бұрын
if Cristobal were to raise his head and see what they have done to his couture house, he would ask to be buried again but face down, so that he could not get up never again ....
@AM-np3hf3 жыл бұрын
fascinating. My great grandfather was a civil engineer from Russia-he became a pattern maker for Balenciaga among other designers of his time. Love learning more about him.
@parisbreakfast3 жыл бұрын
A wonderful clarity describing the gifts and genius of both designers. Thank you ❤️
@hypatiatam3 жыл бұрын
When you’ve been in China for too long, all you’ll think of when you hear “balenciaga” are plain t-shirts with the brand name printed somewhere on the front and those sock shoes :(
@disappearintothesea3 жыл бұрын
Yes! You just reminded me of the time I was stuck in an airport in Shanghai watching this 19 year old Chinese kid with his givenchy bucket hat, balenciaga t-shirt, supreme belt bag, sitting on his rimowa luggage with his dior high tops. smh.
@evelynborn37603 жыл бұрын
Absolutely love your videos I'm so glad to know I'm not the only fashion fanatic on this planet hahah
@MrPeteandPete3 жыл бұрын
Thank Henry for a lovely Tuesday morning with my tea. Balenciaga and Givenchy met in the 50s in New York. Their friendship was a wonderful one which is rare in fashion. Balenciaga liked Givenchy and mentored him.
@jonathanlee45113 жыл бұрын
I will always hold all of these designers in the highest regard, but for sure my favourite will be Balenciaga. However, I never understood why Balenciaga is pitted against Givenchy. Also wasnt Balenciaga also Givenchy’s teacher at some point? Anyway, the way I see it is that Givenchy was sort of a continuation of Balenciaga’s work or rather someone who built upon and continued to innovate upon Balenciaga’s pieces. Also love ur stubble roast on the haters.
@biancachristie3 жыл бұрын
Mentorship is a gift, for both parties, and an underrated skill in our more isolated and selfish artistic and cultural climate. I wish more people understood that
@boaz13533 жыл бұрын
ranking creators in any field is so irritating to me
@branches33413 жыл бұрын
I loved the clip of the YSL show, d'you know where I can find more photos/videos of it?
@Ramdom683 жыл бұрын
Can France stop appropriating things? *BALENCIAGA* was a SPANISH designer. He stablished his first shop in San Sebastian, Spain and his works for the Spanish Royal Family are famous worldwide.
@nikolaskoulountis62003 жыл бұрын
Well said Henry! I have great admiration for both designers, and as you say, each one for his own worth and contribution.
@mariak97273 жыл бұрын
🥰Thank you Henry! I found it fascinating that 4 important designers all chose the same fabric to use in their collection! 🥰 (Givenchy’s interpretation was my favorite😊)
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Maria! 💙
@robertoignacio40543 жыл бұрын
I love the masters as well, I studied fashion and have always gravitated towards the classic lines, elegant fabrics. I have always admired both Balenciaga and Givenchy. Also Valentino, De La Renta, Coco Chanel, Lagerfeld. I also like a little flash, like Mackie, and Versace
@escrivaninhadepapelao79053 жыл бұрын
Thank u for the superb video! Could u share with us a list with the names of all designers who are on this montage at the 9:30 mark? That would be lovely. :)
@nycp19693 жыл бұрын
This is a very well researched and presented video, and one that helps me develop an appreciation for Givenchy. I have long been in the camp that regards him as a designer of pretty, ladylike fashions that lack a strong point of view. I now understand that he was working deliberately on a particular palette of ideas that he refined gradually. It is clear from your comparisons that Givenchy kept his focus on his clients' needs. In most of the direct comparisons, I agree that the Givenchy version was cleaner and likely to flatter more women. Balenciaga could sometimes over-conceptualize. If I were to think of a pair of analogous American designers, I would offer Geoffrey Beene and Oscar de la Renta. Beene was the creative master, concerned with making designs light, seamless and geometric. De la Renta was concerned with making women look pretty.
@nicolemostofa79233 жыл бұрын
this video is so well-researched. thank you for the information! Production and voiceover were also really well-done. And I also appreciate your perspective of accepting art from all artists and respecting individual preferences.
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! So pleased you liked it 💙
@palaceofbrilliance61643 жыл бұрын
7:10 Ah, it's so interesting that you mention Lanvin, because I just did a short video on her and quickly mentioned Balenciaga (just because of his apparent love of El Greco, and I was thinking on why she had used this bright green in her 1930s dresses, that he then had used in his 60's clothes. (and I just assumed they both turned to El Greco) I had ordered the book on the 2019 exhibition where they exhibited the grand Spanish masters (by whom B. was inspired apparently, Zurbarán for sure) and Balenciaga's dresses
@just_cade3 жыл бұрын
Givenchy's silhouettes are still relevant and frequently referenced today, they're timeless and chic.
@Brsbeach2 жыл бұрын
Henry your videos are so great- I am enjoying and learning from every one! And you have reawakened my love for Givenchy and Audrey-I am so glad I found you!! :)
@fashiondolldreamer3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video!!!! I totally agree with everything here. Many designers in the history of fashion had contributed something worthy, all of which added to the richness and diversity of that history... People forget that Givenchy first made his name in the Haute Couture with separates for evening that could be mixed or matched;- something that is so commonplace in modern dressing now, but was a revelation back in those days of head-to-toe Couture. Even though people of course will have favourites, It is very narrow minded- even quite ignorant!- to think only one of those talents counted. I'm also so glad that you showed that an essential part of their creativity was the dialogue they had with each other, and their generosity in imparting their knowledge and ideas to the following generation. They were all intelligent enough to realize that this only helped to foster and develop everyone's creative talents, which in turn would benefit fashion itself. Sure, there was rivalry and competition... that exists to this day! But creativity can never exist in a vacuum.
@jesusnaseiro-gayoso59753 жыл бұрын
What a great video. And let us not forget that non only they were friends, but when Balenciaga closed his atelier, he introduced to Givenchy all his clients, including Bunny Mellon etc...
@modfus3 жыл бұрын
Madeleine Vionnet was a genius also. Her clever construction techniques were avant-garde and became hugely influential on fashion design that followed.
@alexanderpons92463 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic video and topic! Yes, there are many unknown clothes makers all around the world that nobody knows about them and create wonderful garments. Many times clothes when are copied are also improved, many times as the process of coping happens a change in the way of doing things take place. Prime example was given once by Dolce & Gabbana who have seen copies of their designs done even better than the one they made. Funny how both houses Balenciaga and Givenchy still exist yet the new creative teams have had to make it profitable and relevant for todays world and market.
@ShaiLysk3 жыл бұрын
Balenciaga would be very very disappointed in whats in his shop today. SMH
@mckenzie.86533 жыл бұрын
Or would he be pleased that his brand is still running strong in 2021. Those black slip on sneakers are everywhere and permeated pop culture. That’s a legacy. 💯
@christopherpearson4483 жыл бұрын
I could say thank you a million times! This was an excellent piece.
@kismet23543 жыл бұрын
A very well thought out & argued presentation. Bravo 🙌🏻
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@kennethkauzlaric89483 жыл бұрын
Fashion is so subjective. Thank you pointing this out. Although I love classic designers, my favorite designer is Armani...he learned his craft as a tailor's son. I really appreciate cut, tailoring and detail.
@STICKITINYOUREAR3 жыл бұрын
For me it was always Givenchy. He had style, class and a great sense of a woman's femininity.
@LVluxlife3 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@clarashook33983 жыл бұрын
What an excellent video. Your perspective is quite refreshing. All these designers have something different to offer their creations, but the illustration you made about how the greats have collaborated and even tutored the next generation of designers is spot on, as seen in the examples provided. In addition, I have to say, your video quality (content, editing, sound) are top notch. We are looking forward to seeing more videos soon. ✨ Personally, I too prefer Givenchy's clean, classic lines.
@KARamil3 жыл бұрын
Found another good fashion YTer! Subscribed!
@Ardna533 жыл бұрын
So excited to see a new video from you. Fantastic!
@massimodepietro70053 жыл бұрын
DUE grandi artisti hanno lasciato nel mondo della moda un segno indelebile di classe ,eleganza,innovazione,gusto nel fare apparire le donne sempre perfette le vestivano non le travestivano esaltando in ogni loro creazione il corpo delle donne.Dopo il loro ritiro il diluvio a parte qualche eccezione gli altri hanno contribuito a riempire il mondo di stracci inutili che hanno mortificato molte volte le donne senza esaltare la loro bellezza.Il bello per loro era tutto si notava in ogni singola creazione capolavori unici che rimarranno per sempre nella storia della moda.
@dhananjaysinghkandari3 жыл бұрын
I like to believe popularly known rivalries like armani and versace, Schiaparelli and Chanel and many more were just popularized by the media and the designers were probably laughing about this in real life
@speziello3 жыл бұрын
Not Armani and Versace, they did go at each other in the wildest possible way
@nokesbob22563 жыл бұрын
I love your channel and look forward to your stories.
@evillcowboy3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for another well researched and entertaining video! I love finding a new video essay . I got the Givenchy bug when my parents bought that outrageous Lincoln with his name on it. My mom wanted the Dior but dad won and got it green, the color of money he’d say (I grew up in Wyoming... When I was going to school anf working at a boutique bank in the city, I would spend hours at the high end consignment shops on Madison. My wardrobe budget went a lot farther if I could find worn suits and tailor them myself. And I was always drawn to his suits. Idk how much he actually did on his menswear, but they fit my square body perfectly. I also studied millinery while in the Navy, and opened up a hat shop there. But you know hats, they’re always coming back in style, yet never do... And my best friend bought me a pair of Givenchy sneakers. Outrageous, but they do feel wonderful. I think it’s a gay trait; we are drawn to the most expensive in the store! Long winded, just a thanks. Oh, did you study any design? I studied architecture, but good design is good design. Did you or do you ever design clothes? Tyia 🤠
@marlykurtzernarvaez35143 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful and insightful video essay. More please!
@jorgkukla80973 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this clear and sensitive statement! Like you, I admire Balenciaga's works (for sometimes, they seem like arts and crafts) and his distinctive style. I see Givenchy as an interpretor, giving his clientele an impeccable, elegant look. It always leads to the question: what is elegant? I think, elegant is the art of knowing how to wear a fine couture work: on YSL it is said to need a very present, strong woman, aware of her feminity with a slight twist of rebellion. In a Balenciaga piece, you needed to have the inner power and souverenity: they sometimes were like a perfect, glittering shield against the world. In Givenchy, you knowed, you are dressed at the finest, but would need personality. New Couture clientele always needs some time to see who's best for them. I think, Givenchy was very dedicated to his clients and eager to please them: a sensitive interpretor. And I LOVE the colours of Givenchy!!! He knew about colours!
@Infante19793 жыл бұрын
I want more videos from you, what a voice, what a knowledge about fashion. Loved it!
@SayYoJ3 жыл бұрын
It’s Givenchy for me..... much rather their design to that of balenciaga as of recent!
@doggle29283 жыл бұрын
Always enjoy your presentations and background history of content. I must admit though, I miss a glimpse or cameo of your smile and beautiful bright blue eyes.
@kristincheever21453 жыл бұрын
Wow, your attention to detail is remarkable. I truly enjoyed every minute. Thank you.
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching, Kristin! 💙
@jemdramirez3 жыл бұрын
Can you name all the designers flashed at 9:29? Thank you very much!!
@flazeda87433 жыл бұрын
9:28 Who's the black lady designer on the top right corner please ? :)
@henryjjwilkinson3 жыл бұрын
That's the wonderful Ann Lowe 💙
@garycraigart35793 жыл бұрын
Rivalries come and go as seasons and collections do. We are left, happily, with the brilliance of all these visionary artists. I do wish that more people also remember Jacques Fath.
@ernestcastro62383 жыл бұрын
Henry Wilkinson Thank you very much.
@lapislazuli78764 ай бұрын
Henry, that was a wonderful treatise on something I have contemplated for many years myself. I am a devotee of both men and of Vionnet/Grès as well. I have always looked at fashion as what I call “lines of descent”, which is a way that academicians study art. Fashion of course, is not an art (despite what people think) but an applied art and also a craft, but its theories are still very applicable to fashion because fashion, like art, has low-high-decadent phases. So, I see a kind of genealogy within fashion and if one sees it that way, then it helps to prevent this postmodern day, egotistical, consumerist tendency towards one-uppmanship. Rather, I prefer to see revivalism and evolution in fashion and dress. Your video perfectly expresses this same idea and I think it’s important, especially for students of what I prefer to call “tastemaking” (the study of architecture, interior decoration, interior design, graphics, advertising, photography etc) to review the history of fashion through connections and reprisals, revivals, reimaginings, recovery and inspiration rather than competition, hatred, constant “bettering” and ego. If one takes a bird’s eye and more Hellenistic view of fashion, one will begin to see rhythms and patterns : an ‘eternel retour’ (eternal recurrence) as Nietzsche called it. This rather generous and capacious philosophical idea addresses and meets the Balenciaga/Givenchy debate perfectly. Both men worked within a purist application of taste, mostly classical but also at times rather romantic. But both strove to reduce eveeything to an essence, a moment, a singular line of expression. That was what they had in common. Givenchy though, being at the height of his fame during the 1960s just expressed it in a more youthful way, because that was the zeitgeist of his time. Balenciaga’s clients, however, were much more “adult” in appearance and manner. They were “grande dames”, and very “femme” as opposed to Givenchy’s “gamines” and “jolie dames”. Balenciaga’s women were terrifyingly chic grown women and society matrons. Fabulous, severe, imperious and no-nonsense. And yet, both men had so much in common. Givenchy ‘evolved’ many of the ideas and concepts within the Spanish couturier’s œuvre, but simplified / reduced/ deduced it even more.
@bringiton52827 ай бұрын
Going through Givenchy's archives online, I found a fantastic photo taken by Hiro Wakabayashi in 1967, it looks so modern ! Sometimes I find it quite hard to tell the difference between a look by Hubert de Givenchy, Cristobal Balenciaga, Yves Saint Laurent ... And at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter, if it looks good !
@garywarmee43673 жыл бұрын
HENRY - In wizzing past Eve, no 80s, but I do want to say my eye locked onto the Mondrian dress first time I saw it! For decades I did not know Mondrian was the name of an artist line of drawings.. For me, it does not grow old. A few weeks ago I was at Goodwill(!) and found a tightly stuffed Mondrian pillow in white, royal blue, a tad of orange w/ black piping. So much less expensive than the Lee Radziwill bodice, a real steal at $4.95! Looking more than brand new!
@Schneeeulenwetter3 жыл бұрын
love your editing
@aephraums3 жыл бұрын
Thankyou for this very thoughtful narrative, I always thought Givenchy had been a junior at Balenciaga,as were Ungaro and Courrèges and that is why the influence in his work was so strong at Givenchy, but yes they did have a very close relationship/ friendship/ mentorship..... to your point on the use of the floral fabric 'the who did it better challenge" I think at this level of couture perhaps we may need to look at who had the better collection or more innovative and cohesive collection. Thank you again and I am looking forward to seeing more of your work.
@marciehaley58703 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a beautifully written and narrated video. So insightful.
@dannybeun9483 ай бұрын
Luxery by simplicity 👌
@HAUGHTYHAUTE3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your presentation. I know many who don't understand or appreciate Hi End Fashion. Trying to be patient!
@nimrawasim61743 жыл бұрын
What a brilliant depiction on the topic by you. Thorough and while it's an opinion piece it's almost like a professional documentary.
@lavana25163 жыл бұрын
wonderful comparison thank you
@andonamin3 жыл бұрын
Ambos, grandes maestros de la alta costura, cada uno en su estilo
@TheKarmacola3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful video very educative as well ❤️ Greetings from a small Himalayan Kingdom in Asia ... Bhutan 🙏❤️
@bradleyeric143 жыл бұрын
Designers who share a period and a continent are also going to share concepts and trends. In contemporary art there are trends which result in product from one artist closely resembling the product of another. One result is that differences are studied in endless detail while great areas of commonality are almost ignored.
@AdonaiForMe3 жыл бұрын
Outstanding presentation!
@monaanaya40663 жыл бұрын
Again I enjoy your knowledge of design and designers thank you so much
@antmullenix-fielder843 жыл бұрын
Henry your channel is such an amazing collage of information! New subbie here and I am so glad I stumbled upon your channel. Such an interesting young man you are. Cheers!
@fabrisseterbrugghe85673 жыл бұрын
I'm a big YSL fan, but it's his 1960s through his late 1970s Russian collection that do it for me.
@nycp19693 жыл бұрын
I agree. I don't think of YSL as an "80s designer," as is suggested here. By the 80s, YSL had largely stopped innovating and was operating in an "elder statesman" capacity, recrafting beautiful iterations of his masterly cut suits and dresses in beautiful colors. I think his greatest period is the 60s and 70s, especially his famous 1940s-inspired collection. I do agree with Henry that the 80s just don't do it for me!
@fabrisseterbrugghe85673 жыл бұрын
@@nycp1969 I really think the Russian inspired collection from the mid-late 1970s was his last GREAT collection. By the 1980s, you're absolutely right, he's spinning his wheels a bit.
@nycp19693 жыл бұрын
@@fabrisseterbrugghe8567 I'm not a big fan of the Russian and Chinese collections. I don't think they advanced fashion esthetically or in terms of fabrication, although you might say they anticipated the opulence of the 1980s. What's interesting is that YSL actually had Russian looks in his Rive Gauche line several years earlier. For much of the 70s, Rive Gauche was where his most creative ideas originated.
@fabrisseterbrugghe85673 жыл бұрын
@@nycp1969 Yes, YSL was a big follower, and leader, of street style and got it back to the older generation. I remember buying Rive Gauche perfume in Paris before it was available in the US. As far as fabrication goes, one of the points of the Russian collection, if I'm remembering 50 year old Vogues correctly, was to show the skills that were being lost and create a new demand for them.
@nycp19693 жыл бұрын
@@fabrisseterbrugghe8567 That I don't know. I just think that YSL was extremely artistic and took inspiration and appreciation from everywhere. He could appropriate anything into fashion, usually masterfully but other times less successfully. I learned a great deal about him from the FIT Museum's 2015 exhibition YSL + Halston: Fashioning the 70s, a thrilling exhibition comparing the two designers' output during this decade. You can see the entire exhibit on the museum's website or buy the comprehensive book for a reasonable price on Amazon.
@Phoenixhunter1573 жыл бұрын
I love all the Jacqueline Kennedy givenchy designs. I love them both. Don’t see them as competitors at all. I love the deceiving simplicity of givenchy lines. But they aren’t simple at all. That’s his deception.
@Phoenixhunter1573 жыл бұрын
@Vintage-Vintage stop it
@m_d_l_a32083 жыл бұрын
What I don't understand is why OTHERS continue to use the designers name for their own designs.
@figf4833 жыл бұрын
i love givenchy. it is classic and sweet and glowing
@jchung50663 жыл бұрын
"because with something as idiosyncratic as fashion, no one's word is law." Amen
@jchung50663 жыл бұрын
this is what I will say about my crocs from now on
@agatarek_pl3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, you put so much work to create this video for us ❤️🙌🏼
@JonUbick3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this wonderful comparison of two men of different times and origins and their tete a tete
@sarkis27043 жыл бұрын
Wow, just discovered your videos, I’m in love !😍
@Alexandra-bk5pi3 жыл бұрын
I've just entered into your Pinterest account looking for any sort of Givenchy archives and god....I was given a WHOLE page 😨
@KellyfromMemphisDD2143 жыл бұрын
Demand your money back!
@julietteyork37213 жыл бұрын
You have the rare and wonderful ability of demonstrating diplomacy. I observe that many people have the tendency to engage, on a continuum (to a lesser or greater degree), in what psychologists call “splitting.” This is a psychological phenomenon whereby people have the urge to pit one person against another, to value one and devalue another, to choose sides. It’s an unconscious, primitive drive, born out of early emotional experiences. There’s also a component to splitting that’s evolutionary in nature - it was necessary to identify the “good object” because it meant survival, whereas the “bad object” meant potential danger. People tend to have the need to organize others and the world at large into “good” or “bad” in this primitive fashion (no pun intended!). You don’t often see people with your emotional maturity, which permits the holding of two “good objects” simultaneously. In any case, I don’t know as much about Balenciaga’s work as I do Givenchy’s and found this video fascinating and enlightening. It’s nice to know about their friendship and the generosity the former/elder showed the latter/younger. Being kind, and witnessing kindness in others, always feels much nicer than the alternative. Personally, I sometimes fall into the primitive inclination of picking sides (splitting), but when I observe someone like you I’m reminded it’s not necessary.🌷
@20thcenturyboy853 жыл бұрын
Cool video. Feminine Audrey also helps one decide on their preferred designer!
@lisawynne-magnuson94693 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed this, thank you!
@hautehadeel3 жыл бұрын
I love your channel!!
@jamesallison48753 жыл бұрын
Beautifully presented.
@carlinkay11513 жыл бұрын
Thank you Henry...great video! 🇦🇺🦘 greetings from Australia!
@laerteoliveira61473 жыл бұрын
Both were amazing and brilliant
@justshowmehow3 жыл бұрын
Stellar video once again.
@jp86493 жыл бұрын
How dare you suggest taste is subjective and you may like whatever you want!!! AUDACITY! This is a very good piece and you should be very proud of yourself. I really enjoyed it. I'm new to this stuff and will be subbing for more learning.