踢爆博彩程式的邪惡陰謀

[@kamgg8068]

賭sir, 封面嗰個係咪蕭若元？係咪暗示啲天書係佢公司出版或著作？ 盼有回覆，因為條片都一年前。

[@walkingair97]

恭喜，賀喜🎈🎈🎈杜蛇終於衝破50000訂閱心理關口!!!😢😢😭😭😭🤜🤛

[@HermanToMath]

多謝！！！！！

[@HermanToMath]

多得你嘅支持！！！Keep住分享！！！

[@walkingair97]

@@HermanToMath 當然要分享亞蛇嘅至理名言「屁股決定立場!!!」🧐🧐🤣🤣🤣🤜🤛🐒

[@康永業]

波膽點可能追欖呀！輸足半年等閒事，賭sir 繼續拍多啲呢類片，造福大眾，多謝多謝。

[@HermanToMath]

未播已經有2個Dislikes送畀癲書作者，好波！仲有2個Likes送畀賭Sir我，好鼓舞！

[@westwah]

😂👍 大智若愚 同我性格一樣…哈哈哈哈哈

[@HermanToMath]

賭Sir咸冬甩 大愚若智

[@walkingair97]

莫非又是「屁股決定立場!」😂😂😂

[@HermanToMath]

睇嚟你好中意呢句，哈哈！

[@1paultang]

幫緊你自己

[@garysuen3796]

以大搏小係應該買藍籌收息做息魔👻賭錢就係刀仔鋸大樹先有意思

[@HermanToMath]

盈富J金 跑贏樓市 www.bastillepost.com/hongkong/article/408381-唔易跑贏盈富

[@garysuen3796]

@@HermanToMath都係既MTR都撞得有咩係無可能

[@1paultang]

好似幫緊你自己

[@ost-ln2uh]

食屎啦食屎啦食屎啦食屎啦 可以拎嚟做ringtone🤣

[@soianso0723]

係咪特登用動物牠😂😂

[@tongchunpong9049]

多謝踢爆迷思🙏🙏👏👏有意義！！

[@HermanToMath]

💪💪💪

[@mantsungchoy9709]

好簡單嬴10場輸1場都係輸，因為輸抽水🤨

[@HermanToMath]

全靠老蕭，你終於睇到條片。

[@jonathanchan4901]

賭蛇，想請教你如足智彩抽水約10%，咁係咪即係馬會既+ev係10% ？

[@HermanToMath]

係

[@HermanToMath]

完全正確

[@frankytsui9179]

香港良心！！！

[@bkmanchow7898]

嬴粒糖 輸間廠

[@westwah]

擔定櫈仔😁

[@HermanToMath]

歡迎水友

[@royroy9378]

緊係唔計EV啦,計親都負EV既,仲洗旨意叫人買?

[@HermanToMath]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@lomeihk]

食屎啦! 食屎啦! 食屎啦! :-D

[@wentaowang2174]

OMG!!!! Why are you bashing the Martingle and not the even money bet. They are the same i.e.odds wise. In addition the negative EV that you preached when playing Bacarrat is ONLY true IF the law of averages prevails. Playing the hands must be considered as short term. Irregularity happens in short term and therefore the EV should be thrown out. Anyway your honest opinion. Does the Casino grind players off their money because of House Edge? Its because people PLAY TO PLAY and not PLAY TO WIN. They are betting way over their head. Are they interested in winning 20% of their Bankroll? All these things contributed to their losses MORE than the MATH part that you preached. Even if the Casino forgo the House Edge, people still LOSE!!. And finally, if a person worries about the negative small EV in Baccarat, they should worry about life events like Being strike by a lightning OR run over by a car when crossing the road OR objects falling from the top floors when they walk out of their apartments. They should stay at home, but wait a minute a plane could ram into their home. Think about this , everybody is living their life with negative EV whan life events are concerned. SHOULD WE WORRY ABOUT THEM???

[@alankwan6743]

The Martingale is no better nor worse than the constant bet, except when some fool believes that it actually works (is profitable) and follows the prescription to make very large bets. Since the house edge is a ratio, a very large bet means a very large expected loss (in absolute terms). Plus the risk becomes unbearable, especially when the fool is taking a loan to make the bet.

[@alankwan6743]

I have talked with casino management. They do grind their profits through the house edge. You can actually calculate their profits from the EV and the turnover.

[@wentaowang2174]

@@alankwan6743 , If one were to do a 5 step Martingle, its only 31 units. What kind of gambling does not require 31 units bankroll? Its manageable. In order to prove you wrong lets be fair with the argument. You mixed up 8 deck of cards everyday and play 8 selected hands and stop. Selected means charting and play ONLY when you like. Don't play every hand. Let the results speak for themselves.

[@wentaowang2174]

Not right. The house edge is 1+% but the hold in Baccarat is 14% to 25%.

[@HermanToMath]

Although the concept of Expect Value is based on the assumption of infinitely many number of games, it doesn't mean you are not affected if you only play for a short period or even one game. EV is a criteria that you can judge an action whether it is worthy or not. Negative EV represents an overall disadvantage. If you still bet on it, of course you still may win, but it means you are stupid, because you are also going to make similar bad decisions in the rest of your life. EV is a criteria for making decision. You can't let the result speak because you never know the result before you make the decision. That's why we need a criteria to deal with such randomness.

[@josephlo1297]

入黎聽食屎啦(´∀｀)

[@HermanToMath]

😂😂😂😂😂