Salafi vs. Sufi & Bid'ah - 1/2 - Shaykh Hasan Ali

Watch Part 2 Here: • Salafi vs. Sufi & Bid'...
This lecture has been brought to you exclusively by Hikmah. Subscribe for updates on new uploads. For more information visit: www.hikmah.co.uk or email us on: [e-mail]
Like our page on Facebook - hikmahonline
Follow us on Twitter - hikmahonline

[@binauraldoc9978]

Bro this video is 10 years ago but still timeless in its relevance, may Allah reward this sheikh

[@Ahmad.ali1-r9o]

Amin

[@malenedietl3369]

The story of his sheikh moved me to tears. What a blessing to have met a person like that, subhana Allah. ❤

[@mhossain-ph7sk]

In Bangladesh the things the Islamic Mullahs does...but this brother...he opened my eyes. I have learnt from him in a month than my entire lifetime from Mullahs of our country. He is a gem. May Allah fill his life with his grace. Ameen. My mother who passed away last year used to listen to him. That is how I got here from her old phone.

[@sisterfleur7523]

SubhanAllah!! May Allah bless you. Listen to Nouman Ali Khan and Mufti Menk too they are amazing

[@dmsalim6016]

@@sisterfleur7523 no they aren't. dont listen to them. rather listen to other great scholars from the manhaj of the salad

[@dmsalim6016]

salaff

[@cooki6331]

@@dmsalim6016 No need put other brothers down that way. As far as I know there’s nothing wrong with them, and Nouman Ali has a great series on the Quran. I recommend it.

[@acethegreat2946]

@@cooki6331 nouman Ali khan is not qualified to teach tafseer. How can someone who never studied the hadith teach the Quran? If not with the understanding of the prophet, then who’s understanding?

[@marcthezani]

I like listening to this brother this is the Islam I imagined. May we increase in knowledge, be humble, be rightly guided from a non-Muslim studying Quran.

[@tipeihongkong7181]

Ameen.

[@rhuszy7619]

Are you Muslim now

[@Redpaw000]

@@rhuszy7619 It don't concern you, sorry for being so abrupt.

[@tazboy1934]

Islam is islam

[@BANGIMAN.]

We take Islam from evidential texts from the Quran & Sunnah Not our imaginations or opinions

[@shahidhussain9176]

I follow the salafi way but like him as I try to take best from all good schools of thought like him, good to listen to someone who does not just shout scream etc

[@yusofka6623]

you should watch this may Allah bless you kzbin.info/www/bejne/pnTUoaCojLKdpLs

[@zhasan6561]

I am from a deobandi family.but deoband can't answer all of my questions but madinah can.so now I'm a pure salafi.

[@Mashalalanazi123]

if you follow the true salafi way my dear we do not take good from people who have strayed away from the right path. you should listen to the scholars who follow the prophets Sunna and not the people of desire .

[@shahidhussain9176]

@@Mashalalanazi123 I written full detail on salafi deobandi and Barelvis/ Sufi All info you ever need non bias not promoting anything but answer all your questions it’s long if you like I can send it but covers beliefs to history if you please let me know I give you email it’s quite large to fit here thanks brothers

[@usmanmunj4024]

@@shahidhussain9176 assalamualaikum would you be able to send me this inshallah?

[@hamidaziz8187]

The fact that he talked about how scholars were in the U.K. before and how they only talked about certain topics was a sad realization and that just shows you that this sheikh is truthful mashallah and inshallah

[@nazeermustafa]

Alhamdulillah, he made his points and we never get tired to listen to his full talk due to his way of lecturing. Now we cleared some disputes between two good people . May Allah give him more strength and knowledge and an opportunity to continue.

[@taimur74]

I love this Sheikh from the bottom of my heart. May Allah (SWT) grant him Jannah

[@ahmedhaashi8031]

Al-Anbiya 21:92 إِنَّ هَٰذِهِۦٓ أُمَّتُكُمْ أُمَّةً وَٰحِدَةً وَأَنَا۠ رَبُّكُمْ فَٱعْبُدُونِ Indeed this, your religion, is one religion, and I am your Lord, so worship Me.

[@Mohamedmifxal]

Salaf is the short term for Salaf Saliheen, meaning to following the ways of the best three generation of muslims in terms of aqeedha and practice. So in theory this is the correct way and the essence of the Ahul Sunnah Wal jamaah. I don't know about Sufis or sufism, But in general any one who prays five times a day, facing the same gibla and eats from the same form of slaughtering are by default Muslim unless he/she does anything that nullifies Islam. What did Prophet (saw) said to do in order to be among the saved sect? he said to hold on to the Quran and his Sunnah. So as long as you are doing that then you are among the saved sect. Most of these quarrels occur when people are ignorant about Islam and Sunnah.

[@exsalafi]

Mohamed Mifxal I wonder if the 4 Imaams were amongst the "Salaf Saliheen"......

[@omeridrees5433]

exsalafi Salaf al-Salih, refers to the first three righteous generations, sahabah, tabi'een and tabi' al-tabi'een. If the imams you refer to fall into the aforementioned categories, then they fit the bill.

[@Mohamedmifxal]

صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْىٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَرْجِعُونَ

[@TheGreenPillCoach7]

Mohamed Mifxal What you are saying is technically true, but what is important to understand is that as br Omer Idrees has said, the first three righteous generations include the Four Imams. Imam Abu Hanifah (RA) learned directly under the feet of Sahabah. But, more importantly, what we need to understand is that you cannot simply go into a time machine and engage those first three generations. Salafism is seriously misinformed in this regard; you cannot simply open the books and think, "BAM! I automatically have the understanding of the Salaf woohoooo!" Nay, this is not how life works. In order to have the correct understanding, you need to go to the Scholars who are CONNECTED via the SANAD, BACK to the First Three Generations. These are the Shuyookh who have INHERITED the knowledge that has been transmitted down the ages via ijazah which authenticated credible scholars from deviants and along with the ijma of the shuyookh, a standard of credibility was maintained. Anyways, I would advise everyone to listen to this lecture and actually pay attention to his points. Ramadan Kareem!

[@Mohamedmifxal]

I agree with him, my comment was targeted to those who are stubborn with extreme views about Salaf, whenever scholars disagree then we have to resort back to the Quran and the sunnah and the Salaf. There are two things, ijthihaad made by the salaf and comments or statements made by the Salaf that can only would come from knowledge they acquired from the Prophet (saw). the latter is what is most important, former is the acceptable ikhthilaaf. Correct me if I'm wrong

[@owaisrehman3789]

I LIKE THIS SHEIKH ALHAMDULILLAH HE IS VERY BLESSED PERSON !! WISH THERE WAS MORE PEOPLE LIKE HIM AROUND ,, HE IS TRULY BLESSED MAY ALLAH ALMIGHTY ALWAYS KEEP HIM SMILING

[@shakir1998]

I have a big smile on my face everytime i see a video uploaded form this sheikh.

[@fahimhaque9171]

Shaykh, I wanna thank you soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much for you lecture....May Allah ( SWT ) bless you...thats my prayer from the depth of my heart.

[@khamisalbiman8104]

Mashallah! It's a must listen lecture. clearly we need this balance

[@roseofjenna]

For all of the people who are salafi, who have posted comments, I have not heard you reference anything about common ground. You are so busy trying to prove that the brother is wrong and not focusing on how we as a Ummah can come to common ground. This division will destroy us. I say this because my son follows the the salafi minhaj, I on the other hand try to adhere to as much of Quran and the Sunnah of our Holy Nabi (pbuh) as possible and also recognize the need for the science of Tassawaf in my life. My son an I are barely speaking to each other because I ask him to listen to this lecture. He felt that I was calling him to disobedience. (Is this not extreme) As his Ummie I would never tell him to go against Allah and our Beloved Nabi (pbuh). It was only my intentions that he would gain a clearer understanding of the science of Tassawaf. Not for him to change his way, but to respect mine. At the end of the day, Allah (SWT) is our Judge and it is He who knows who truly will be successful in the end.

[@ibrahimhosry7284]

roseofjenna I too know what it is like to have that division in the family . The mother of my daughter my ex wife is Salafi while me and my father are Sufi. It leads to so many disagreements I just say nothing so as to keep the peace! My mother and her family are Christians I suggested a birthday celebration and got a telling off for putting bad ideas in my daughters head!

[@khilafat2023]

Is there any Tassawaf in our prophet teachings?, in Abu baakr, Umaer, Usman, Ali and Sahabas life??? Tasawaf is Bidah

[@noumaan699]

@@khilafat2023 Is there something known as fiqh in our Prophet's teachings?Is there anything known as sahih ahadith? Fiqh is bidah, Hadith is bidah...

[@aurakh2444]

Keep making dua.. May Allah make him return to true path of ahlussunnah waljamaah. Mother's dua is most mustajaab. May Allah give you patience. I'm from Indonesia and here I see several families break apart because of salafism. Including my own sister, she was divorced with her husband too due to difference of aqidah

[@khilafat2023]

@Aaliyah Powell Everything I know about so called tasawuf is either Biddah or shirk. How come Prophet forget to mention Tasawuf which is now consider by many a very important part of Islam!!!!

[@ahlulsuffiyah4888]

He speaks like a thorough gentleman, MashaAllah

[@fahimhaque9171]

Shaykh, totally Respect to your open minded thinking...

[@ilyaselbadr6387]

Shaykh Hasan Ali... Top G

[@copkhan007]

Problem with us Muslims is that we are either Sunni, Shia, Maliki, Hanafi, Shafai, Barelvi etc etc. QURAN says Obey Allah and his messenger. We are following everyone else but his beloved Prophet peace be upon him.

[@faisalbhatti6646]

The Mahaj of following the Quran and Sunnah is known as Salafiyah!

[@gabriellight1273]

Faisal Bhatti Stop making up your own definitions and sects because the manhaj of following the Quran and Sunnah is known as muslim. If you can't get your definitions correct then any fundamental conclusions your going to make are wrong and your entire world view is wrong. These things have been defined by the scholars more than a thousand years ago.

[@faisalbhatti6646]

Gabriel Light La! Define to me what Salafiyah is before you attempt to refute it

[@copkhan007]

Faisal Bhatti since you defined the meanings of Salafiyah now define the meanings of Sunni, Shafai, Maliki, Wahabi, Hanafi. And also tell me was our Beloved Prophet PBUH one of the above or his companions fell in the above sects? Explain.

[@gabriellight1273]

well check the arabic meaning on the word sunni and it will be clear, "In the beginning" there was the ummah, then the shia decided to form their group and they called it shia which literally means partisans, or those who split from the group, the remainder of the ummah then called themselves sunni or those who stayed on the sunnah, all you have to do is think about the words, you are seriously stuck on the labels and can't see past your politics. In sunni islam there are four schools of legal theory, if you have studied at any university then you know science is technical and complex, in islam we have four schools of law. If i wanted to simplify the explanation, i would say imam Ali was Hanafi, the companions who lived in madina are Maliki, and the Shafii and hanbali madhhabs are a mix of both the companions of madina and Iraq, so in that case what the hell is a salafi? What am i referring to, i am referring to the opinions that Imam Abu hanifa, Malik, Shaffi and Ahmad followed, they then looked into the opinions of the companions and derived the methods by which the companions come up with their opinions and from that the science of Usul al Fiqh was born that every legal system on earth today relies on, and which translates as the legal principles of Islamic law. The four madhhabs agree on about 75% of these principles (Usul) and have differences on about 25%. These are the madhhab of Fiqh Law, But as Jibril (as) defined Islam in the hadith of Jibril recorded by both Bukhari and Muslim and it is agreed upon, Our Deen consists of four areas of knowledge, Islam (which Fiqh comes under), Iman (which Aqeedah comes under), Ihsan (which tasawwuf comes under) and signs of the hour (which remembrance of death and the afterlife comes under). The ulluma went through these four areas of knowledge in Islam and codified the knowledge in them and developed sciences, like the modern sciences you know and rely upon, in order to study our Deen with accuracy. So there are also madhhabs in Aqeedah like Maturidi, Tahawi and Ashari. Calling any one of these madhhabs a sect is like calling physics a sect that opposes the sect of chemistry, does that make sense to you? If you want more clarity then you have to look at it in depth. This why it is ridiculous that a person says either salafi islam or sufi islam its completely idiotic because it is saying Ihsan vs Islam vs Iman pick one you can't choose them all. the fact is salafi's are a fiqh based group and sufi's are a Ihsan based group, they have nothing to do with each other. The haram and halal in Islam is in the hands of Fiqh and the madhhabs and has always been that way. Salafi fiqh is based on the Hanbali madhhab while sufi's can be either of the four madhhabs including Hanbali. So a shaykh can be Hanafi in Fiqh, Maturidi in Aqeedah and Qadiri in Tasawwuf. Ibn Taymiyah was Hanbali in Fiqh and Qadiri in tasawwuf, he wrote extensively on it, his major work majmul al fatawa, volume 11 is entitled tasawwuf. All you have to do is check history and the facts and don't believe the first thing you read it may come from a person who hasn't studied in depth but only a little.

[@NazmulIslam-qf6jw]

shaykh hasan ali is upon the haq. he has clocked it what is to be a muslimuun. you need certain aspects salafism to know your deen becuase it helps distinguish haq from baat il, this is to nourish your mind. you also need certain aspects of sufism like zikr, duaa, reflection and solitude to spiritually connect with your creator. once you combined both narratives you will peace and tranquility, it will make you sincere inshallah. note I am saying certain aspects so dont bash me by saying sufi or salfist but i will say muslimun is better term. certain aspect of sufism to clense the heart (zikr, duaa, reflection, solitude from duniya.) + certain aspects of salfism (sharia law, haq and baatil, tauheed and fiq) help the mind and becoming more determined and increasing belief. = muslimuun

[@shawncannady6037]

Most of the SHAYKH in islam will go against the MAHDI when he appears,His islam will b pure.

[@szenith4975]

good thinking.

[@lordeleyejah6180]

+Shawn Cannady fancy seeing you here akhi lol

[@abusalih1991]

true

[@beaubell5638]

this is the best example

[@0001nse1]

I love this Sheikh, Alhumdulillah, he's so funny! Shirk, Shirk, Bidah, I'm the only Muslim here! Hahahaha! Masha'Allah, how are we going to end this immature Fitna? I have done it myself in the past and I'm quite ashamed. I appreciate this lecture.

[@letsgetitit2987]

Immature Fitnah? if the Muslims say something is Bidah and Shirk with evidences and provide Quran and Sunnah with it then what is immature about calling an act shirk or Bidah if the correct and authentic evidences are given along with the understanding of Scholars? This is typical pure hatred for truth to be spoken. But Alhamdulillah's haram will remain haram even if the hold world is doing it.

[@Abdullah1111111]

Can someone tell this sheikh I love HIM for the sake of Allah ta ala. Jazakallah Abdullah from Belgium SALAAM. Brothers and sisters time has come to seek help with almost constant zikrullah thru out the day and night whenever you are awake apart from the fard ibadah ofcourse. Istighfaar, Alhamdolillah and la ilaha ilallah are my favorites to remember in my heart.

[@0001nse1]

I wish Shaykh Hasan Ali gave Halaka regularly at a Masjid near where I am, brilliant, I like how he keeps a good spirit during the Halaka.

[@AbuMoosaa]

Seek the evidence in every issue. Seek the Sunnah in every issue. Seek the Manhaj, the methodology and faham, understanding of our Salaf as-salih in every issue. Seek the principles of Ahlus Sunnah in every issue. On the issues of fiqh, ijtihad (where there is no specific evidence or conflicting evidence or scholars have differed on an issue) read both sides or all sides and take what you feel comfortable with. Stay away from sins, innovations in the Deen and blind following of personalities, Imam, Shaykh, Talib etc. Stick to the Ulamah and Tullab who direct you to this way. This will bring about true unity in the Ummah.

[@S3ven4]

You want some more delusion on top of that misguidance?

[@S3ven4]

"there's gonna be extremists that will never ever reconcile with anyone no matter who they are" That my friend, is you

[@hakimibnasri3224]

@@S3ven4 Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2676 Narrated Al-'Irbad bin Sariyah: "One day after the morning Salat, the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) exhorted us to the extent that the eyes wept and the hearts shuddered with fear. A man said: 'Indeed this is a farewell exhortation. [So what] do you order us O Messenger of Allah?' He said: 'I order you to have Taqwa of Allah, and to listen and obey, even in the case of an Ethiopian slave. Indeed, whomever among you lives, he will see much difference. Beware of the newly invented matters, for indeed they are astray. Whoever among you sees that, then he must stick to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided Khulafa', cling to it with the molars.'" حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ، حَدَّثَنَا بَقِيَّةُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ، عَنْ بَحِيرِ بْنِ سَعْدٍ، عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ مَعْدَانَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو السُّلَمِيِّ، عَنِ الْعِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ، قَالَ وَعَظَنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَوْمًا بَعْدَ صَلاَةِ الْغَدَاةِ مَوْعِظَةً بَلِيغَةً ذَرَفَتْ مِنْهَا الْعُيُونُ وَوَجِلَتْ مِنْهَا الْقُلُوبُ فَقَالَ رَجُلٌ إِنَّ هَذِهِ مَوْعِظَةُ مُوَدِّعٍ فَمَاذَا تَعْهَدُ إِلَيْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ قَالَ ‏ "‏ أُوصِيكُمْ بِتَقْوَى اللَّهِ وَالسَّمْعِ وَالطَّاعَةِ وَإِنْ عَبْدٌ حَبَشِيٌّ فَإِنَّهُ مَنْ يَعِشْ مِنْكُمْ يَرَى اخْتِلاَفًا كَثِيرًا وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّهَا ضَلاَلَةٌ فَمَنْ أَدْرَكَ ذَلِكَ مِنْكُمْ فَعَلَيْهِ بِسُنَّتِي وَسُنَّةِ الْخُلَفَاءِ الرَّاشِدِينَ الْمَهْدِيِّينَ عَضُّوا عَلَيْهَا بِالنَّوَاجِذِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ ‏.‏ وَقَدْ رَوَى ثَوْرُ بْنُ يَزِيدَ، عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ مَعْدَانَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو السُّلَمِيِّ، عَنِ الْعِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَحْوَ هَذَا ‏.‏ حَدَّثَنَا بِذَلِكَ الْحَسَنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْخَلاَّلُ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ قَالُوا حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَاصِمٍ عَنْ ثَوْرِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ عَنْ خَالِدِ بْنِ مَعْدَانَ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو السُّلَمِيِّ عَنِ الْعِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَحْوَهُ وَالْعِرْبَاضُ بْنُ سَارِيَةَ يُكْنَى أَبَا نَجِيحٍ ‏.‏ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ عَنْ حُجْرِ بْنِ حُجْرٍ عَنْ عِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَحْوَهُ ‏.‏ Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2676In-book reference : Book 41, Hadith 32English translation : Vol. 5, Book 39, Hadith 2676

[@jubayerahmed1726]

I am really greatful to Allah (SWT) that I could find this Shaykh in you tube. Love you Shaykh for the sake of Allah (SWT) from Bangladesh. Zajakallohu khoiran.

[@GoodOne4All]

This Shykh is real and doesn't live in a fantasy world. Awesome lecture!! Islam is the middle path!!! Understanding, love respect is the way. Remember Muslim is one who cares for all and knows rights from wrong and doesn't spread hate and are greedy! Not Salafi Not Sufi Not Deobandi Not Barelvi Not Ahlel Hadeeth

[@ibrahimhosry7284]

Let's be Good I’m fed up of people generalising I think that doesn’t help. You put Salafi and Sufi in the same group but not all Sufi are the same probably not all Salafi are the same either. There is difference of practice and aqeedah among these groups. If you mean they are extreme I agree that Salafi are far right wing. But I know Sufis who are not extreme in their practice and belief maybe slightly left of centre? It is all a bit ridiculous we are Muslims at the end of the day and we ought to pray at each other’s mosques. I used to be Christian and I saw the same divisions among the churches. I won’t tolerate people who seek to divide us the ummah. As for me I am muslim and these all are my brothers abs sisters.

[@kamalcrew4354]

i"m really glad like to see this cheikh ,who is humble and who takes himself as much as a muslim. my allah keep you safety

[@mamunrahman9616]

The one who judges the way you explained is not Salafi even though he claims to be. So please dont label such people as Salafi. You should say "those that claim to be salafi say so and so or do such and such". Not "some salafi this some salafi that". The word Salafi was applied to seperate the people of ahuls sunnah from the people of innovation during the great fitna that begun arpund the time of Uthman RA death. To be Salafi is to follow the Quran the sunnah and the companions. Not to be judgmental but also not to unite under the wrong methodology. We should unite under the quran and sunnah. Bring Haqq to the confused Ummah.

[@ibrahimhosry7284]

Old News salafism is new phenomenon. Before Abdul Wahhab and the salafis Sufism was tolerated. This whole calling things bidah things that have a chain going back to Abu Bakr and ultimately to Rasoolullah saw.

[@gashibina3767]

@@ibrahimhosry7284 It was tolerate because people started to go astray from the right path of, by praying to graves . 😒 And Sufis make they give the attributes of Allah to them .

[@nahidulislam9497]

And how he says " salafi-deobandi" is complete nonsense as well, salafiya is pure and free from these groups

[@mamunrahman9616]

@@ibrahimhosry7284 Dear Akhi, salafism is not new. What did the prophet say to Fatima on his death bed in Bukhari 2450b/6285,6286 & Muslim 2450c? He said to her "Fa Innahu Ni'ma asalfu(Indeed I am a rightious salaf for you)" The best guidance is the guidance of the Prophet and the Companion and those who followed them in precision i.e the salaf us saleh. In Taymiyaah in his Majmuh Fatawah said: "there is no critisism upon the one who makes manifest the madhab of the salaf and ascribes himself to it. The ascription is accepted from him by concensus because indeed the madhab of the salaf is nothing other than the truth" Abu Hanifa said "adhere to the athar and tareqah of the salaf and beware of newly invented matters as all of it is bidah" - reported by As-Suyootee in Sawn al mantaq wal Kalam p32 Did not imam Malik say "The latter part of this ummah will not be rectified except by what rectifed its earliest part" i.e the rectification is found in the kitaab and the sunnah according the the undestanding of the salaf us saleh? And I leave you with the advice of our salaf ibn Sireen: "Indeed this Knowledge is deen so be careful from whom you take your religion from" May Allaah guide us to what is correct and pleasing to Him.

[@ibrahimhosry7284]

Mamun Rahman the movement was started in the eighteenth century by Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab in Najd in Saudi Arabia. I’ve heard this fallacious argument before. There are nothing you will use to make your argument. You should listen to Ibn sireen yourself. What you have is laymen Muslims claiming to have the right to do ijtihad and self interpretation of the texts when in reality only a scholar can . Also the rejection of the four imams and their madhabs. So yes I agree it is important where you take knowledge from. But I for one do not take it from al-Albani and Ibnutheimeen and bin baz. Out of your extreme ideology you have the likes of Sayyid Qutb and other jihadi scholars who promote what is basically terrorism. And by the way Ibn Taymiyya was deviant on some issues

[@Learnwithidrive]

They don’t talk about haraam mortgages in any mosque. Even though they know the entire community is at war with Allah and our prophet Muhammed saw

[@nahidakhtar296]

This sheikh is very good! My daughter listens to him and she is young! Mashallah!

[@gabriellight1273]

Saying you should choose between Salafi and Sufi is like saying should you do what the Quran says or not. Salafi is a Fiqh based group based on the teachings of the Hanbali madhhab, Sufi or Tassawwuf is the science of Ihsan in Islam which is mentioned in the Quran in Surah shams (91), Qad Aflha man Zakaha, the one who purifies it succeeds. So do you want to choose between Fiqh or Ihsan, it is an idiotic choice. The Ullumah gathered all that Allah said about Purifying the self and created the science of Tassawwuf, just like they gathered all that Allah said about the Laws of Islam and created the science of Fiqh and they gathered all the Knowledge regarding Iman and created the science of Aqeedah. Saying either of them is not from islam is Kufr, the Issue is which fiqh ruling is correct and which isn't not which one of the two groups is muslim or not because that is just confused. The Ulluma can be Shafii in Fiqh, Maturidi in Aqeedah and Shadhilli in Tassawwuf at the same time, Jibril (hs) Said this is how Knowledge in the Deen is Divided, Islam which is Fiqh, Iman which is Aqeedah and Ihsan which is Tassawwuf, Do a search for the Hadith of Jibril recorded by both Muslim and Bukhari, the Hadith occurred 86 days before the prophets (saws) death and at the end of the Hadith rasul allah (saws) said this is Jibril who came to teach you your Deen. These sciences deal with the different types of knowledge in Islam, the Salafi's dont deal with the same subject as Tasawwuf they talk about fiqh, it is the Madhhabs that deal with the Haram and Halal in Islam not the Ullumah of Tassawwuf. So they should be arguing with the Ullumah of the Madhabs about whether something is permissible in Law not the Ullumah of Tassawwuf who are dealing with the diseases of the Nafs,in our Deen it isn't the Place of a Shaykh of Tassawwuf to decide Haram and Halal that is the Place for a Mujtahid in the Madhahab of Fiqh, this is why people are confused over this issue they don't even know who to ask about these matters. When you ask a Scholar of Tassawwuf regarding the Haram or Halal of a Matter he is quoting the Opinion of the Fiqh Madhhab he Follows, Shafii, Hanafi, Maliki or Hanbali, not his Tariqah in Tassawwuf which only deals with purifying the self of bad Qualities.

[@ThEsiLhOuEtT3]

Gabriel Light thank you!! I have this opinion and have yet to meet someone else with it

[@hannahff]

Gabriel Light 100%

[@riyadharun9389]

Some of the issue with "Sufism" resides in the English terminology, the other half is in ignorance. You used the key word tassawuf, which is worlds apart from the concept of Islamic mysticism known as Sufism that the Deobandi movement actually opposed and is basically not Islam. Tassawuf is just another component of Islam as you mentioned, like you I don't see how people are making a divide with it.

[@2.7brksqd6]

Gabriel Light loool salafiyah is not based on just imam Ahmad ibn hanbals teachings. Salafi is the following the way of the prophet sallahu Alayhi wa Salam and his companions through the first 3 generations (includes the 4 imams - hanafi,Shari,Maliki,hanbali).

[@zayboonsahebdin7920]

9

[@riaaduddin4813]

First thing we have to learn is the aqeedah that the Messenger pbuh and sahaba ra was on. We dont have to be salafi or sufi we just have to follow the islam taught by the Messenger pbuh. We listen and we obey him. ALLAH never made it difficult the Messenger pbuh has conveyed the message and its clear as day but it is humans who seek a different way than his way making these difficult for everyone, by these divisions, trying to invent new ways of worship etc. Whatever the Messenger pbuh gives you take it and what ever he forbids by revelation leave it. We take the haq whenever we see it and leave the baatil we call people to the way of the Messenger pbuh and the sahaba. These sects are merely division we should not label ourselves or others as anything except muslim if they are muslim but we should tell people the correct sect is that ONE the messenger pbuh and sahaba ra followed

[@IMZLEGEND1]

H😊

[@khalidkarimragnarbenson6839]

I love listening to teachers who are not stuck in a box of doctrinal "Indoctrination." lol

[@Dattebayo217]

After the first 10mins, i agree with your entire lecture. May allah(swt) reward you shayk.

[@Abdulbasit-alshafi3i]

don’t do that that’s blind following be careful may Allah guide us all

[@tompouceful]

I'm an infidel by the terms of a lot of different groups of moslims. I can live with that and i don't feel mistreated, because i know that my infideltility is a phrase used by people who even mistrusted the air they breath in. All i can say about the Shaykh Hasan Ali, that i respect and liked his opinion and open view of all the aspects of the Koran. His honest and friendly words are a blessing in a time of big differences between religions and their followers. Thanks a lot for the lecture.

[@abdulbowhunter]

Tassawuf is a knowledge in islam get your facts right before putting uneducated views forward Tassawuf is knowledge of purifying your hearts

[@gamerpro1558]

Ok

[@daughterofadam6321]

His point about people reading a few Islamic books then claiming to be/acting like experts is excellent! People would never read a law book then claim to be a lawyer and stand for someone!

[@yahyaa321]

I remember when I was younger where my parents insisted that I had to give salam by touching other peoples feet on every single eid. However as I grew up I learned that this particular practice had nothing to do with islam.

[@nazmulslater8398]

I use to do that to but i stopped most asians do it its a practice from hinduism.

[@IrfanQuraeshi]

Repent bruh.. some people do this here too

[@nailakhan2876]

Its a sign of respect

[@peacefulindian318]

@Freedom fighter Heaven is at the feet of our mother. Touching mother's and father's feet is a sign of respect. Also,Indian culture. Should we be very radical? Islam asks us to respect our parents!

[@peacefulindian318]

@Freedom fighter More sinful are dowry,beating the wife,cheating siblings in inheritance,not educating the children,discriminating women, etc.

[@zakirnaik9208]

Shaikh Hasan Ali is telling truth about Islam, that we must change with times and make sure that the Good Islam prevails over the Evil part of Islam.

[@DARTH-R3VAN]

Shut the hell up. Islam is good in all its parts. You are a man with no knowledge.

[@Siddiqui386]

May Allah give the Sheikh a good health and long Hayat that he can spread discuss all the matters about islam easy and understandable InshaAllah.

[@MitzProductions]

I fell asleep to this. Good stuff.

[@sa3768]

dawah man needs to watch this. 20 mins

[@VOICEOFDOUBT]

Sarwar Ahmed 😂😂😂😂😂😂😭😭😭😭😂😂😂😂

[@Foralluhaterz]

I like dawah man but he is a salafi right

[@machoyote3991]

Sarwar Ahmed only qur'an and sunnat can take u to the right way ,no wahabi no sufi no whatever which is superior to Islam

[@5eek3r0fknowl3dg3]

u idiot macho man, who doesnt follow that u wahbi

[@machoyote3991]

Mahfuz Munir Khan PT I did not understood Mr wiseman

[@CGJUGO80]

ameen ya akhee..may Allaah protect the Muslims from bid'ah and restrain us from speaking without knowledge ameen

[@inspirationalguy81]

It is sufficient for the believer to accept & believe whatever Allah has said about himself without going deep into the verses of the Muthashabihat (verses in which only Allah knows the true meaning). However the Hizbis (those with a Cult mentality) have created their own set of principles of beliefs which they term as "Aqeedah" which they use to divide & attack the rest of the Ummah. These beliefs are based solely upon theological differences of opinion amongst the Scholars, which are not necessary for the lay person to delve deeply into because they are differences of opinion based upon on the verses of the Muthashabihat. They deem anyone who does not believe in the same theological beliefs of their scholars regarding these verses of Muthashabihat that they are out of the fold of Islam. SubhanAllah. They call themselves big words like "People of Sunnah" & handpick certain Hadith with which they use to create divisions but ignore those that call for mercy & unity solely because they differ on the opinion of the scholars they follow on the verses of the Muthashabihat. Wake up oh Ummah. These are the very people who are silent about the mass slaughter & forced starvation of Muslims in Yemen by the treacherous regime whom they blindly defend even though they have clearly sided with the disbelievers in unjustly slaughtering innocent Muslims. The very people who are silent about the regime they defend who are inviting evil practices and fitnah to spread across the holy lands. These very people proclaim to be of the people of the "Sunnah" & that they follow the way of the "Salaf". The true people of Sunnah & the Salaf would never behave as they do. It is easy to claim such things but the reality is very far from the truth. You only have to see the way these people behave in their arrogant and harsh approach towards others & are highly intolerant to valid differences of opinion amongst the scholars. They make it a habit to attack other Muslims including scholars & their tongues are very sharp when it comes to making Takfir upon another believer. They have made theological differences of opinion of the scholars regarding verses of Muthashabihat as "fundamental" aspects of Aqeedah so as to completely block & prevent unity & in order to move away from the rest of the Ummah whom they deem as being out of the fold of Ahlus Sunnah. They have an inferiority complex called Saved Sect Syndrome (SSS) and it's a very debilitating disease of the heart. May Allah save us from those who divide the Ummah. Ameen

[@AbuAzZubayr]

In multiple hadiths, The Prophet said that the saved sect was the one that was What the Prophet and the companions were upon which are the Quran and Sunnah so thats the right and correct path and not to innovate new things which have no basis or have anything tondo with islam soo yea

[@scorpion32]

@1:29:52 That is wrong the prophet never allowed anyone to bow tp him or stand up as veneration . The hadith is when muad ibn jabal returned from sham In, al-Musnad (4038), and other books of ‘Hadith, there is a Hadith that states, "When Mu’adh ibn Jabal returned from as-Sham Area, he bowed down before the Prophet ... who said, ‘What is this, O, Mu’adh?’ He said, ‘O, Messenger of Allah! I saw the people in ash-Sham bowing down before their bishops and patriarchs, and they attributed this practice to their prophets.’ He said … ‘If I were to command any person to bow down before anyone, I will command the wife to bow down before her husband, because of his great right on her. O, Mu’adh! If you pass by my grave, would you bow down?’ Mu’adh said, ‘No.’ The Prophet said, ‘True, do not do it.’" Also, Allah’s Apostle refused to allow the companions to stand up while he was sitting down, even though they were standing for prayer, so that it did not appear as though they were imitating those who stand up for their leaders. He also stated that those who like people to stand up for them will be among the people of the Fire…

[@gabriellight1273]

I don't get how you can quote one hadith verses another hadith, he wasn't giving his opinion he was giving the opinion of rasul allah (saws) you are not a Faqih to be able to tell the difference between the situations in each hadith and why one act was not permissible while the other Rasul Allah (saws) stayed silent on. Both ahadith where talking about veneration of Rasul Allah (saws) but the difference was one Sahabah was directly with intention copying the christians in an act and Rasul Allahs (saws) reply was would you bow down to me at my grave, meaning the christians are worshiping them in that act because their Knowledge and understanding of Deen does not remove their Niyah, intention, from mixing ibadah, worship, from veneration. The other act Rasul Allah (saws) stayed silent on the matter and didn't encourage it but didn't stop it either this is because that act with a muslims intention and knowledge behind it isn't the same Ibadah as the christians who do not have our Quran and knowledge in order to make the same intention as us when doing such things and that is respect alone, like the Angels showed respect to Adam by prostrating to him. The Prophet (saws) said inahul aamalu fi niyat, every act is according to it's intention.

[@ahlulsuffiyah4888]

@@gabriellight1273 omg wow perfectly explained, I agree with you Neo Salafis don’t know the difference in worship and veneration

[@ydw8405]

We need more Syakh like him for a better understanding of the diversity among muslims.. 👍

[@windfal7]

26 years I'm following my shaikh in sufism. Qadiriya Chistiya. Haven't heard a single time criticising the salafi or any factional stuff.ilm, dikr, amal and haal are studied and nuisances of nafs, purification of the self, nafs & Shaitan as the enemies in the path. It's not like one cannot be a true Sufi with adherence to Sunnah and Quran. May Allah bless everyone with true light of guidance. Ameen. Assalamu alaikum wrwb ❤️🌷

[@123ifzal]

MashaAllah nice lecture very knowledgable brother may Allah guide us all

[@abidhussain-zt6ig]

Hasan ali is so melo and chill much respect for him , he can talk and relate to kids.

[@thebachu786]

Mashallah, a very helpful talk

[@malikhaibey]

I truly enjoyed this video! This is so truth! Masha’Allah

[@123ifzal]

@khalid khan and umer faroukh I'm sure he has studied Islam more than you two put together Get to his level of knowledge before you start putting up your opinions

[@kimxt7562]

SubhanAllah this is the perfect lecture and this shaykh is such a rare gem alhamdulillah

[@AlbaMBBT]

Bid'ah is a new invention in acts of worship but not in material things that can help you like a clock or car or books..

[@riyadharun9389]

Yes, that's entirely correct. The tools we invent have no impact on our akhirah unless we either use them for good/bad or they were expressly invented for the purpose of worship. The foundation of the debate on bid'ah is the hadith: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Whoever introduces a good practice that is followed, he will receive its reward and a reward equivalent to that of those who follow it, without that detracting from their reward in their slightest. And whoever introduces a bad practice that is followed, he will receive its sin and a burden of sin equivalent to that of those who follow it, without that detracting from their burden in the slightest.'" I saw someone explain that the best interpretation for this hadith is "anyone who revives a dead sunnah" rather than "anyone who starts something good"; the reason being is that Muhammad (s.a.w.) ave the companions (r.a.) completed and mastered the deen, so it's only possible to revive a dead sunnah as creating a new one is impossible. The issue with this is that people think this means anything we "perceive" as good is halal; the issue with bid'ah "hasan" and any other classification of "halal" bid'ah is the opinion of many internationally renowned Ulema in that Muhammad (s.a.w.) was the balance and he was perfect, so doing anything he didn't do is suggesting that he made mistakes, was ignorant of the deen, or that someone is claiming to know more than him (s.a.w.) or claiming prophethood. There's only one kind of bid'ah, the haram kind.

[@MrGYPSYSPADE]

Al-Shaykh Muhammad Nasir al-Deen al-Albani said in Al-Silsilat al-Da’eefah (1/110), where he quotes the (weak) hadeeth “What a good reminder is the subhah [masbahah],” “In my view, the meaning of this hadeeth is invalid for a number of reasons: Firstly, the subhah [masbahah] is bid’ah and was not known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). It happened after that, so how could he (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) have encouraged his Sahabah to do something that was unknown to them? The evidence for what I have said is the report narrated by Ibn Waddah in Al-Bid’ wa’l-Nahy ‘anha from al-Salt ibn Bahram, who said: ‘Ibn Mas’ood passed by a woman who had a [masbahah] with which she was making tasbeeh, and he broke it and threw it aside, then he passed by a man who was making tasbeeh with pebbles, and he kicked him then said, “You think you are better than the Sahabah, but you are following unjustified bid’ah! You think you have more knowledge than the Companions of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)!”’ Its isnad (chain of transmission) is saheeh (authentic) to al-Salt, who is one of the trustworthy (thiqah) followers of the Tabi’een (Successors). Secondly, it goes against the guidance of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). ‘Abd-Allah ibn ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) said, ‘I saw the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) counting the tasbeeh on his right hand.’” He also said (1/117): “If there is only one bad thing about the masbahah, which is that it takes the place of the Sunnah of counting on the fingers, even though all are agreed that counting on the fingers is preferable, then that is bad enough. How rarely I see people counting their tasbeeh on their fingers! Moreover, people have invented so many sophisticated ways of following this bid’ah, so you see the followers of one of the [Sufi] tareeqahs (orders) wearing the masbahah around their necks! Or some of them counting with the beads whilst talking or listening to you! Or another one - the like of whom I have not seen for some time - riding his bicycle through a street crowded with people, with the masbahah in one of his hands! They are showing the people that they are not distracted from the remembrance of Allah for even an instant, but in many cases this bid’ah is a cause of their neglecting what is obligatory (wajib). It has happened many times - to others as well as myself - that when I greet one of these people with salam, they answer only by waving and not by saying the words of the greeting. The bad results of this bid’ah are innumerable, and no one can say it better than the poet: ‘All goodness is in following that which went before (the salaf) All badness is in the innovations of those who came later.’” And Allah knows best.

[@viliaaso738]

Jazak allahu khayran shaykh ! I finally understood the concept of bidaa !

[@mustaf7674]

it is 2024, been eleven years since this was posted, i am not sure whether anyone from turkey touched the issue that dear sheikh ali mentioned at 1.00.08 ., ok getting right to the point, in turkiye we offer tasbeehs one to another after salah by throwing the tasbeeh so it is not a gesture of pushing people to use tasbeeh, it is rather offering it for people nearby, you obviously you dontt get up and pay a brief visit to every single brother in massed to offer them tasbeeh you simply throw one to him, may Allah swt protect all muslims all around esp gaza, turkistan, arakan

[@ibeibra8648]

PEOPLE SHOULD THINK BEFORE THEY SAY A BAD WORDS ISTAQFURULAH

[@mohamedameen4526]

beautiful lecture by sheikh Hassan Ali

[@blugublu]

This video is very good. It's very disturbing when you're discovering the deen to see people who are more knowledgeable than you and who act really silly and spend so much time to basically spit at other muslims from an opposite school, vice-versa. Unfortunately, I think that as it is, considering the burning title of the video, some of our brothers won't spend 1h36min before letting themselves go and spit at their opposite kind of thought.

[@GloryBelongsTo_ALLAH]

May Allah unite us, Aameen

[@seankhan8420]

This Whabi Sheikh is a joker he claims to not to judge people and not make a difference. Yet he indirectly is slagging sunni muslims saying some people who do extra things. He is advertising his Mullah how good he is etc... Try following Dawate Islami they will show you what sunnats are in daily life.....

[@afzaltar2750]

You are right. I started following then and they are on the right path.

[@maxamillianful]

3:103 "hold firmly to the rope of allah all together and do not become divided" unfortunately many sects Sufi, shia, deobandi etc have ignored this ayat..

[@BeatifulMasjid]

i love this guy very funny.

[@kaysoruddin5628]

He's not making fun of the deen, this sheikh speaks to different audiences according to their understanding and how they would understand him. For example with teens and young adults he likes to throw in a few jokes here and there to engage the youngsters and keep them listening to the lecture. You will see this in his lectures, he varies the way he speaks to people which was also another sunnah of the prophet pbuh, he spoke according to people's own understanding etc.

[@dawahaltawheed6200]

If you ask, how should we deal with those who commit bid’ah? The answer is: Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “In both cases, we have to call these people - who claim to be Muslim but who commit acts of bid’ah which may constitute kufr or may be less than that - to the truth, by explaining the truth without being hostile or condemning what they are doing. But once we know that they are too arrogant to accept the truth - for Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning), ‘And insult not those whom they (disbelievers) worship besides Allaah, lest they insult Allaah wrongfully without knowledge.’ [al-An’aam 6:108] - if we find out that they are stubborn and arrogant, then we should point out their falsehood, because then pointing out their falsehood becomes an obligation upon us. With regard to boycotting them, that depends upon the bid’ah. If it is a bid’ah which constitutes kufr, then it is obligatory to boycott the person who does it. If it is of a lesser degree than that, then it is essential to examine the situation further. If something may be achieved by boycotting the person, then we do it; if no purpose will be served by it, or if it will only make him more disobedient and arrogant, then we should avoid doing that, because whatever serves no purpose, it is better not to do it. And also in principle it is haraam to boycott a believer, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘It is not permissible for a man to forsake [not speak to] his brother for more than three [days].’” (Adapted from Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, vol. 2, p. 293) B. Shirk, its types and the definition of each Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen said: “Shirk is of two types, major shirk which puts a person beyond the pale of Islam, and lesser shirk.” The first type, major shirk, is “Every type of shirk which the Lawgiver described as such and which puts a person beyond the pale of his religion” - such as devoting any kind of act of worship which should be for Allaah to someone other than Allaah, such as praying to anyone other than Allaah, fasting for anyone other than Allaah or offering a sacrifice to anyone other than Allaah. It is also a form of major shirk to offer supplication (du’aa’) to anyone other than Allaah, such as calling upon the occupant of a grave or calling upon one who is absent to help one in some way in which no one is able to help except Allaah. The second type is minor shirk, which means every kind of speech or action that Islam describes as shirk, but it does not put a person beyond the pale of Islam - such as swearing an oath by something other than Allaah, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that whoever swears an oath by something other than Allaah is guilty of kufr or shirk.” The one who swears an oath by something other than Allaah but does not believe that anyone other than Allaah has the same greatness as Allah, is a mushrik who is guilty of lesser shirk, regardless of whether the one by whom he swore is venerated by people or not. It is not permissible to swear by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), or by the president, or by the Ka’bah, or by Jibreel, because this is shirk, but it is minor shirk which does not put a person beyond the pale of Islam. Another type of minor shirk is showing off, which means that a person does something so that people will see it, not for the sake of Allaah. The ways in which showing off may cancel out acts of worship are either of the following: The first is when it is applies to an act of worship from the outset, i.e., the person is not doing that action for any reason other than showing off. In this case, the action is invalid and is rejected, because of the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah which was attributed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), which says that Allaah said, “I am so self-sufficient that I am in no need of having an associate. Thus he who does an action for someone else’s sake as well as Mine will have that action renounced by Me to him whom he associated with Me.” (Narrated by Muslim, Kitaab al-Zuhd, no. 2985) The second is when the showing off happens later on during the act of worship, i.e., the action is originally for Allaah, then showing off creeps into it. This may be one of two cases: The first is when the person resists it - this does not harm him. For example, a man has prayed a rak’ah, then some people come along during his second rak’ah and it occurs to him to make the rukoo’ or sujood longer, or makes himself weep, and so on. If he resists that, it does not harm him, because he is striving against this idea. But if he goes along with that, then every action which stemmed from showing off is invalid, such as if he made his standing or prostration long, or he made himself weep - all of those actions will be cancelled out. But does this invalidation extend to the entire act of worship or not? We say that either of the following must apply: Either the end of his act of worship was connected to the beginning (with no pause); so if the end of it is invalidated then all of it is invalidated. This is the case with the prayer - the last part of it cannot be invalidated without the first part also being invalidated, so the whole prayer is invalid. Or if the beginning of the action is separate from the end of it, then the first part is valid but the latter part is not. Whatever came before the showing off is valid, and what came after it is not valid. An example of that is a man who has a hundred riyals, and gives fifty of them in charity for the sake of Allaah with a sound intention, then he gives fifty in charity for the purpose of showing off. The first fifty are accepted, and the second fifty are not accepted, because the latter is separate from the former.” Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, and al-Qawl al-Mufeed Sharh Kitaab al-Tawheed, vol. 1, p. 114, 1st edition

[@wulfnesthead8788]

Dawah Al Tawheed TL;DR

[@hamzatv3087]

Alhamdulillah..MashaAllah tabarakallah..i loveit..may Allah give u more hikmah and knowledge

[@mh4582]

Very good lecture shaykh but this part was funny 🤣😂 32:09

[@shafaathismailmohamed7046]

Muslims cannot be one The prophet SAW said we will divided You know better or this Moola knows better We do not hire Aalims according to our preference we get Aalims according to faith Aqidah He is now creating another division his own belief

[@14910]

MashaAllah we need more shaykhs like this! The ummah needs to unite!

[@zaraazam]

Excellent talk, thoroughly enjoyed it. The brother talked sense and about true reality!! May Allah reward the Shaykh and the brothers who contributed their efforts towards this video.

[@yasa8362]

MASH ALLAH. THIS IS A INCREDIBLE LECTURE.

[@HZ_LionsDen]

In the example he gave, he stated that it was due to the fact that some of those committee members own shops that sell alcohol.

[@jokerVfahim]

@scorpion32 as the speaker has already mentioned do not quote hadith when you have not spent years studying them with a knowledgeble person. It is the clowns who do this such as the example he gave of the high court

[@alhuzayl6029]

All of that breaking up into different sects (and labeling one's self as other than Muslims) is NOT from the correct Islamic creed). Please see the fatwa of the Mufti of The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's "Islamic Council of Scholars) Shaykh Abdul Azeez Al Ashaykh (May Allah preserve him). As far as I am concerned, You are ALL wrong! May Allah aid us!

[@111afrim]

no human being is infallible meaning we can not blind follow any human being except from the prophet of allah SAW, in aqeedah there is one aqeedah upon which him and his companions were all agreeing upon, with issues from fiqh you follow the correct opinion all four imams where great imams rahimullah but some made mistakes as they are human beings and the sone of adam makes mistakes. too add to that it means that the daleel may be with one imam over the other you can not cherry pick my imam says this so i will stick by it, imam ash shafi rahimullah had said the saheeh hadith is my manhaj, imam abu hanifah had said if you should find an opinion of mind contradicting the qur'an and sunnah throw my opnion on the wall. brothers and sisters in al islam, if a person is a simple person ignorant in knowledge he should follow a madhab BUT also follow them in aqeedah for they had aqeedah of the prophet SAW, but if a person is a person of knowledge is able to distinguish saheeh from daif or truth from falsehood he must not appoint him self t to a specific madhab unless it be the madhab of rasulullah SAW, and yes we are all muslim that is the title we have but the nabi SAW said that the jews had split in to 71 sect the christians 72 and the muslims will split into 73 all are in the hell fire except for 1 the Companions RA had asked who are they ya rasulullah he replied they are the ones upon the religion which i and my companions are upon today, you see ikhwane the religion was complete he SAW had set the religion out for us too follow he is our man to follow but insha'Allah if you follow a madhab beacause you are a simple persson then no problem but remember in the grave you will be asked who is your prophet and who did you follow. and Allah knows best.

[@raeesrahman1250]

Brother, you have tried but need to go more into the depth. Aqeedah & Fiqh are two different part one dealing with belief and another with action. So regarding fiqh there was no need of any Madhabs during the time of Rasool (S) because they had the teacher infront of them and immediately the doubts can be clarified. But after Rasool (S) the Ummah had to get the doubts clarified from the Sahaba (obviously as they are the direct students of Rasool (S) ). Next generation they had to depend on those who learned from the Sahaba. During this period the need of compilation of Fiqh required and great Imams rose according to the situation (all 04 Madhab Imams came during these period from 80 to 241 Hijri). After them only we have great Hadith Scholars (known as Kutub al-Sittah during 194 to 303) but instead of doing Ijtihad they followed either of the 4 Madhab. So i don't see any logic to your view, either you should say you have more knowledge that these Kutub al-Sittah or should have the commonsense to understand even these great hadith scholars didn't find any contradiction to Qur'an & Sunnah to throw their opinion. Now about the Madhab Imams they are not just simply giving their opinion, they are qualified to pass the opinion. The last Imam Hanbal (R) had knowledge of morethan a million hadith (so just think how much would the earlier 3 imams would have) and Imam Hanbal also put a cap to those who what to do Ijtihad must have atleast have knowledge of 400 thousand. Today we don't even have 100 Thousand hadith but challenging the stars up in the sky. You will not find a single scholar after these 04 Madhab Imams who have not followed them. So this is the Ijma of the Muslim Ummah whom we follow.... About Aqeedah we don't have any difference but when Khawarij, Mu'tazilite and lot of other theologies came with the influence of Greek ideology it was required to be destroyed to safe guard the Muslim Theology (Aqeedah). Allah choose great Imams like Imam Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari & Abu Mansur Maturidi who destroyed all other Aqeedah and established understanding of Aqeedah from Quran & Sunnah. So for us Allah has made it very simple to follow either of the 04 Madhabs & either of the 02 Aqeedah which was followed by all Muslims throughout the world. Unless a small group named themselves as Salafi (Wahabi) who confused Muslim Ummah with their Fitna. May Allah guide us to the truth and open our hearts to understand his religion better.....

[@111afrim]

Raees Rahman hasan al ashari had the wrong aqeedah and he had repented to allah, for he refuted his names and attributes. the prophet was not ashari in his aqeeda nor were any of the salaf from the three best generations.

[@raeesrahman1250]

kusheris back Imam Ashari was a student and adopted son of a Mutazili teacher but he went on to became the great Imam's of Aqeedah. He taught to understand aqeedah from Quran & Sunnah and he was the one who destroyed all other aqeedah influenced by Greek ideologies. Have some commonsense before asking such silly questions like Prophet was not Ashari in his Aqeeda, he taught others from studying Rasool (S) so how will Rasool (S) follow him. Lucky you didn't say Bukhari & Muslim was not read by Rasool. You should understand Rasool can't follow Ashari but Ashari has followed Rasool, so both Aqeedah are same. If you want to make some point then you should figure out if some scholars has opposed him but you will find all scholars after him either following him or accepting him. Also he is from the three best generations.

[@111afrim]

Do you know that all of the 4 imams had different aqeedah than abu hasan al ashari?

[@raeesrahman1250]

kusheris back Who said it and can you prove it with evidence ! ! ! The history is very clear that Ahlus Sunnah’s Aqeedah was same during the time of 4 Madhhab and even earlier (from Rasool to Sahaba, from Sahaba to Tabieen and from Tabieen to Taba-al-Tabieen). But when wrong Aqeedah kept on increasing (like Muʿtazilah, Jahmiyyah, Qadriyah, Jabriyah, Kharijite etc) the need arose to compile the right Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah, which was done during the time of Imam Ashari & Maturidi. So it was named after them but both these Aqeedah was same Aqeedah of all Salaf & Khalaf (including 4 Imams of Madhhab).

[@ParvezKhan-py5ys]

ibn al -jawzi refuted sufism in his book called talbis iblis.

[@ParvezKhan-py5ys]

true tazkiyya is from Quran and Sunnah. sufiism has been corrupted long time ago. proper word and method is tazkiya which is mentioned in the Quran. also the statement of Imam Malik and Imam Shafi regarding sufi is not authentic and has no connected isnad

[@TheGreenPillCoach7]

Parvez Khan What are you talking about? Making empty blanket statements is not "proof", it's called an empty assertion. Ibn Al-Jawzi did no such thing. He addressed some pseudo-Sufis who were already being addressed by orthodox and traditional Muslims who happen to follow one of the four madhaib AND pass down tassawwuf as a legitimate and traditional science. Before uttering nonsense like, "sufism has been corrupted long time ago", provide evidence, because ignorant statements like these are going to be held accountable. The book "The Path to Perfection", for instance, illustrates what is orthodox Tassawwuf, and what is deviant pseud-Sufism. Same with the book, "The Inseparability of Shariah and Tariqa".

[@ParvezKhan-py5ys]

well ibn jawzi refuted some groups of sufis since they deviated from the true methodology of tazkiya and some groups innovated. also some sufi tafsirs such as ibn arabi's have strange interpretations and also have been refuted by azhari and salafi scholars.

[@holdshiftt2run308]

@@raeesrahman1250 read the book first.

[@holdshiftt2run308]

@Anti Hate They are in a way. I mean, most people who call themselves sufis belong to a school of thought that falls in line with the ideas of ahlul bid'ah. The individuals themselves may not be people of bid'ah, but the groups are based on bid'ah.

[@imthedaddyq9087]

mashallah very charismatic sheikh, may Allah swt bless him and his offspring.

[@propergeezer]

I'm a non Muslim.. In fact I'm against religion, but I recognise that Sufism is the best way forward

[@noorhassan4361]

how comes you are not Muslim?

[@propergeezer]

+NB 9 Because islam makes claims that aren't true. I believe all religion is man made. But I like Sufis. Don't like salafis.

[@noorhassan4361]

I am sufi . Could you please tell me some claims they make and who you think made the Quran ? Then I can help you

[@noorhassan4361]

I am sufi . Could you please tell me some claims they make and who you think made the Quran ? Then I can help you

[@zaynabyussuf2790]

+PJ _Babu why. Dont. You like salafis. They are good

[@Bachirali]

Mash-Allah. This brother explanation is excellent. I really enjoyed this talk :0)

[@mohamedotaku7161]

tassawuf through prother or anyother person is not allowed only through your Good deeds. Salafi manhaj is about the Sunnah and Quran with the understanding of the Sahaba. Sufism is extremist on worship and the ahlul bid'ah. Stay away from sufi's please. Accept Original Sunni and Original Salafi manhaj for verily it is the way to Jannah

[@gabriellight1273]

Salafi manhaj is a fantasy that uses slogans to attract people but has no substance behind its words because it isn't one of the Madhabs of islam. the salafis haven't produced a single mujtahid who did anything for islam so they are not qualified to comment on any fiqh or Aqeedah in Islam.

[@mohamedotaku7161]

i said Follow the salafi-salih man-haj not the salafi sect that exist right now. they are too extremist some of them.

[@gabriellight1273]

what is the salafi salih man-haj, reading the quran and ahadith doesn't make you one of the salaf or teach you the proper understanding of the salaf, what you said sounded like the salafi sect slogan which is why i thought it was that. The arabic language has changed since the time of the salaf so you can't just read Quran and Ahadith for your self and expect to understand the same things the salaf did from it, this is called the morphology of language and you have to be qualified to understand it properly, so then what kind of advice are you giving?

[@mohamedotaku7161]

Ibn Uthaimeen(r.a.) said that there is a difference betweer the Salasfi salih(the first three generation of muslim) and the Sect Called Salafiyoon. He said dont call your self a "Salafi" but rather call your self a follower of the "Salafus Salih". the Salafus Salih are Muhammmad and the sahaba and then the Tabi'een and the At-ba'u Tabi'een. The first three generations of muslim. understood?

[@gabriellight1273]

Mohamed Otaku thats a slogan, you haven't actually solved how you follow salaf al salih, The Quran is the words of Allah the Ahadith are the words of Rasul Allah (saws), i don't see any major works on the words of salaf al salih around do you? it would entail their interpretation of the Quran and the words of Rasul Allah (saws) and the closest thing i have seen to that is the translation of Tanwir al miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas. Just because you read the quran and Ahadith doesn't mean your interpretation will be the same as the salaf al salih.

[@fatimaabdurahimjama9841]

It breaks heart to see how Muslims have reached so low. So many sects, so many divisions, so many hate towards each other. What is the big deal if we pray, follow sunnah, do good, work hard and just live our lives? Why do people NEED to have a title or a sect to follow. Just follow the Sunnah. You don't need a sect to define who you want to be and your aakhirah.

[@peopleofknowledge1]

Salafiyah is not a sect, it is the methodology of the Salaf, the Sahaba, going back to the foundations of Islam, so we can rectify ourselves. and be like them

[@rajmunna100]

Sufi order is ALHUMDULILLAH the right aqeeda.

[@nez4nez]

this lecture is wonderful

[@junaidmalik7712]

Muhammad phuh never made dua after salah so is it bida if one makes dua after salah since it was never done

[@letslearnarabic2812]

Junaid Malik "Abu Umamah (RA) narrates that Nabi (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was asked: Which dua is most heard? Nabi (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) replied: The dua made in the last third of the night and the dua after Fardh salah.” (Tirmidhi 2/187 H.M Saeed)

[@junaidmalik7712]

LetsLearnArabic wait i asked if it was bida since it was never done right ? hoping someone could clarify, and your response is "It's really sad that everyone thinks they are qualified to leave such comments". are you talkin about me if so why you gonna say that when i asked something

[@letslearnarabic2812]

Junaid Malik lol my bad maybe I got a little excited but it sounded as though you did your own research since you said that the Prophet (alyhisalaam) never did dua after Salah? Which isn't necessarily true but anyhow. Wasalaamualaykum.

[@junaidmalik7712]

LetsLearnArabic i didnt make a statement, i said so is it bida if one makes dua after salah since it was never done, since i never put a question mark it makes it a statement now. read before you type

[@letslearnarabic2812]

Junaid Malik I modified my response, no offence intended it just appeared as though you were making a conclusion based upon your own research etc.

[@abcd-zq6kp]

This person don't know what is Deen. Deen means way of life. It's based on Sharia. When we say "Is it Halal/Haram?", we are including it to our deen. 58:50

[@user-ashfaq10f]

crazy person need to see doctor 😉😉😉

[@Foralluhaterz]

You need a doctor you fool

[@user-ashfaq10f]

hassan Waleed fool talking person need to see doctor 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉 😉

[@mangalorestories4790]

You are the man with dirt heart

[@masumurrahman1307]

Salaam sheikh hassan Ali. Alhamdulillah jazakallahu khairan for clearing the misconception about the dua and hat lol. But one thing I am confused on where you said, about brothers leaving not praying sunnah; isn't it a practice of sunnah that the Prophet (pbuh) used to pray his sunnah prayers at home. ?? Maybe those brothers leaving the masjid are trying to practice that sunnah.. Jazakallahu khairan. Can any brothers comment below and shed some light on this issue.

[@nourhansen6673]

Crap.

[@hamzahassan4136]

***** fok u slag dnt ever say that again

[@mohyeldeensharma6165]

hamza hassan Why do you have a car on your image? Isn`t that an invention from christian? How would your life be without the science and tech from christian? Muslim take foto of the planet Pluto, hahahahahahahahahah.

[@shamranmakki5018]

+Mohyeldeen Sharma wait minute I think you have no knowledge about science go and learn what is Muslims role in science. Muslims are backbone and master mind of science

[@lordofyoutube9495]

+Mohyeldeen Sharma 1001 inventions by Mulims. Read that book ;)

[@alia2ali]

Jazakallahu khairan shaykh, I have sought information on this for so long.

[@AlhamdulillahAkhi]

JazaakAllah! Been waiting ages for this one!!

[@beaubell5638]

I love this sheik may Allah preserve him

[@jigsamoges7019]

Thank you this is what we miss.

[@safetypin90]

we need more scholars like this mA

[@ilyaspure3929]

make dua for Allah defend Ilya,Ivan,Olga,Vadim,Alina,Hamzahon,Valentina,Olesya from dajjal,envy,witchcraft and forgive sins and defend us from commuted suicide on all life

[@lukmanahmed1931]

Br Abu Abdur Rahman, a 23 year old Mufti and Alim is given the title by a group of Sheikhs at Deoband after they have completed a course. Someone who thinks they have become someone by studying Bukhari thinks so by him/herself and that is dangerous as most of these people couldn't get a pass at High School.

[@BilalE7]

This is also how Muftī Taqi Usmani translated the verse, by saying that “He positioned Himself on the Throne” (paraphrased). Muftī Saeed Ahmad Palanpuri, Sheikhul Hadith at Darul Uloom Deoband, has translated - and continues to translate - Istiwā' as “sitting tightly‟ in his lectures, echoing what Shah Abdul Qadir Raipuri inserted in his translation of some of the Istiwā' verses." (Taken from the .za document)

[@truthseekatsa709]

Imagine going through every action and training people to identify what level of thinking could make it into an innovation or not. This Scholar does good. Very good and his message is clear. However reality is something else. It is best to class the act as a bidah since at has transformed from something innocent into something that the majority of people doing it consider part of the deen. We are in a place in time where people have made many things part of the deen. Allah knows best.

[@amabdullah9678]

How you explain the Fatawa of Scholars, something the Fatawas become Haram and Halal. Your theory of Bidda has too many holes, that's why its better to stick to the explanation of the great scholars of Islam, don't reinvent the wheel.

[@d4yl985]

wait a minute, if the jubah is out of love for our prophet so is the mawlid. Please explain

[@sanaullasharief5319]

THE CLAIMS OF 'BUZURGAN E DEEN' 1. Khawaja Mu‘in-ud-Din Chishti of Ajmer (d. 1236 C.E.) He is the so called mujaddid of his time and the saint who laid the foundations of the propagation of Islam in India. He wrote the following verses: i. “Every moment the Holy Spirit [angel Gabriel] inspires into Mu‘in, ( he, himself) “So it is not me who says this, but the fact is that I am the second Jesus.” (Diwan Khawaja Ajmeri, ode no. 70, p. 102) ii. “If the Holy Spirit continues bringing its help, “Every day in the world the Mary of the time would give birth to a Jesus.”(ibid.) iii. It is recorded: “Once in our presence a man came to enter into the discipleship of the Khawaja of Ajmer. The Khawaja asked him to recite the Kalima [i.e. There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah]. The man recited the Kalima. The Khawaja said to him: ‘Say it like this, There is no god but Allah and Chishti is the Messenger of Allah’. The man did so, and the Khawaja accepted the pledge from him and invested him with the robe of honour.” (Fawa’id as-Salikeen, p. 18) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Was he a Muslim , a Sufi , a Shia or a person who denied the finality of 'nabuwat'? Most of the sufis were born in Nishapur , iran , which was a center of ismaeli shias.

[@citizenputtur792]

sanaulla sharief