How to Think About Climate Change | William Happer

[@davidhilderman]

Mr. Happer, Please stay healthy. You are needed as a voice in this insane world.

[@RodMartinJr]

Amen to that. And we need your help to open the eyes of others. What can you do? Plenty. Patriots who love a sane world can band together to push #Nullification of constitutionally illegal laws, regulations and executive orders. Nullification is a cure the Founding Fathers recommended. It was used to protect escaped slaves before the Civil War. And it can be used to shut down criminal politicians who want to destroy America -- like Cuomo putting Covid patients in with Seniors.

[@kathymayes4290]

I’d upvote your comment, but I don’t want to change the number.

[@garysarela4431]

Human-based greenhouse gases cause global warming: www.climatelevels.org

[@carolguessford4474]

@@garysarela4431 Hm I have perused the entire site whose link you presented above. Sorry, sir, but there is nothing there to support the claim you just made.

[@garysarela4431]

@@carolguessford4474 "Greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are the only factors that can account for the observed warming over the last century; there are no credible alternative human or natural explanations supported by the observational evidence." Source: The 2018 Fourth National Climate Assessment

[@davidonly]

One of the few un-silenced actual scientists. Every now and then people like this fellow remind me that the world does have a vestige of sanity remaining.

[@gedofgont1006]

Amen to that!🤝🍻

[@christinamjp]

But look the power the democrats socialists in this country control they control our thoughts our communications now our power did you not see it coming did you vote for democrats?

[@gazmasonik2411]

For how much longer? Gates and his fellow billionaire self interest groups. Are involved in nefarious power grabs using deception and disinformation in climate lies and computer modelling projections for virus deaths and sea level catastrophes.

[@barneybruns8196]

One in a million throwbacks in the science community.

[@jodiestewart8989]

@@christinamjp He made a very concise factual statement and definitely does not seem like someone that would vote for those moronic imbeciles. Let's all keep plugging away at this together. If it's left up to our kids we have no hope . The lowlife powers that be have made sure of that through our education system. While we were busy working....they were teaching our kids :-( Unfortunately the consequence of that is that our kids think we have destroyed the planet and they are left with the mess...they also think chinaJoe is their answer. It is up to us to spend time with our kids and re-educate them with videos such as this. How to get them to watch it is another story. We have much work to do!! Please God give us strength.

[@debbiehigh4904]

When I see a disclaimer from Wikipedia, I know that this Video must have true, factual information they don’t want me to know. I watched and learned the truth about climate change from Professor Happer!

[@ww9876]

Happer is tied to fossil fuel industrys. He's a mirror image of the "tobacco scientists" of the 1940s+. An exact mirror, except now we have less excuse for falling for it since we know it's a thing, and we have the internet to do *effective* research. When you see a warning sign on cigarette packets do you view it as something they don't want you to know?

[@LuzDelValle-g3u]

@debbiehigh4904: Wikipedia ! 😂🤪What a joke!

[@ironclaw6969]

​​@@ww9876Yet his opposition is funded by the entities that can control and steal from, not only us, but also from the entities you claim are backing Happer. 5:53

[@bjones5791]

The "Blue Badge" of honor,showing you're right over the target!😉😎👊

[@makethman007]

im glad he is still alive and telling the truth, god save us from the green wokes

[@callmeishmael7452]

Absolutely brilliant human being. I am so happy to have lived in his time and to have gained so much insight from his accumulated wisdom. From me to you, thank you Mr. Happer.

[@skipmurf2]

Dr. Happer

[@btjmrp]

Excellent

[@douglasschuler4605]

I learned a lot of what he said in school 60 years ago. They stopped teaching it so they can sell all those lies about climate change

[@ladycactus110]

The lefties are like your captain, morbidly obsessed with killing the white whale of sanity and truth. Ready to destroy everything and themselves in the process.

[@paperclip612]

Yes, I agree, much of his lecture was what were learned in scool. Shame on the likes of Al Gore and John Kerry for the DISINFORMATION they have disseminated worldwide with the help of an ignorant Judas media.

[@twominuteshate7885]

I love to see a man who will stand up without wavering and declare that 2+2=4. Bravo Professor Happer!

[@sentientflower7891]

He is a known liar.

[@sentientflower7891]

@Dik Burns read a book my friend.

[@askvic611]

@Jason Bourne companies? It goes much much higher, look at the people around Al Gore.

[@lucygardner5666]

Reduce the CO2 and the flower will wither. Look at the visual evidence of Craig Idso's experiment.🙈

[@chuckschenck3045]

2+2=5 Welcome to the world of Censorship, lies, and the truth is hidden. Our brave new world where the ongoing largest cover-up still going strong since 2011 on the death 💀 f the Pacific.

[@michaelhiggins2562]

Professor Happer has been a voice of truth about the climate for decades. When are we going to listen more carefully to his wisdom?

[@mr.c3928]

Competence over rhetoric. Thanks Hillsdale and Dr. Happer!

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Happer is refuted by 99.9% of the world's publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, the over 170 major scientific institutions that publicly endorse the consensus position, and the empirical evidence gleaned from over a quarter of a million scientific papers. Happer is not a climate scientist. His expertise is OPTICS. He did, however, work on behalf of the fossil fuel industry when he directed the CO2 Coalition and received funding from them to encourage the use of MORE fossil fuels. Food for thought, friends.

[@garykendall8646]

This is a very simplified version of the 38-page technical paper written with Professor Wijngaarden which explains in detailed mathematics and molecular thermodynamics why we are not in trouble with carbon-dioxide. For those who disagree with Happer, let us see your detailed mathematical / scientific rebuttal. Remember that an attack ad-Hominem concedes that you have no logical rebuttal for the argument presented.

[@gazmasonik2411]

Yet..the European parliament voted for a climate emergency by 2 thirds. Allowing taxes on carbon emissions based on fraud. Stupidity alone can not explain this outcome but financial incentives can. The billionaires behind the scenes are not scientists and their actions coordinated against facts about global warming and aimed at fear mongering in areas of ignorance. These follow directives from a source that allowed there status from accumulating wealth in the beginning. This source hasn't the interests of humanity at heart. Greta for one was loaned the Rothschildes yacht, captained by a Monaco prince, to travel from Europe to the USA without carbon then greeted by Obama and allowed media focus on the message of catastrophic carbon emissions. Aimed at young minds always targeted by forces of totalitarian tyranny in the guise of left or right wing authoritarians! History shows how this ends with the same control of narrative and political extremes resulting in wars whether kinetic or economic. Destruction is the aim.

[@gazmasonik2411]

Rothschild family and communist origins have a shared source. Power and control of humanity? The admitted religion of satanism by Rothschild bloodline and parts of democrat party in USA. One Example-Chelsea Clinton flaunts her inverted crucifix and Facebook page new year message to anton le veys church of satan. Easy enough to verify if anyone doubts this. Satan's existence is irrelevant but their belief in such is a reality that is not widely recognized yet a real threat to humanity.

[@NoRegertsHere]

Gaz Masonika wasn’t it Le Vagabond that took her? A sailing cat owned by two Australians who have a KZbin channel about sailing the world? I’m no fan of the way the world has exploited a misinformed child, but throwing out Rothschild conspiracies is also misinformed.

[@gazmasonik2411]

No. But many sources are obfuscated or missing for whatever reason. Greta and her family have links to many dubious characters. The green movement were infiltrated long ago. Stephany Berkowitz the Greenpeace activist provided most of my links to nefarious controls before she died. Far more could have been stated but I can't verify all ...so far, so remain rumour until then.

[@NoRegertsHere]

@@gazmasonik2411 ok. Well one of the legs across the Atlantic was in the youtube yacht I mention. They were under time pressure to make the UN summit and went when the weather was worse than they’d normally have gone with. They talked about it in one of their vlogs For sure serious money being thrown at it. I think it’s disgusting. Teachers are pushing it in schools, companies are in the band wagon and people actually believe it and most I’ve spoken to, when really pushed, think that the real problem is overpopulation. They are of course mistaken, that’s a myth too and easily debunked. But it’s strange how a solution many people come to is depopulation. And before knowingly supporting policies that will have that affect, they don’t double check their beliefs first.

[@chrisblahout7969]

WILLIAM HAPPER is a hero who is dealing with reality and the facts!! ~ Thank you!!

[@ericsandsogranite8138]

No, he's a charlatan.

[@angelagonimavalero7700]

@@ericsandsogranite8138 Do not be disrespecful, troll, go and speak your ignorance and hate someplace else.

[@BrinJay-s4v]

@@ericsandsogranite8138 Your opinion sans facts is not very compelling.

[@evanault9988]

Thank you Professor Happer and Hillsdale College. This was hands down one of the best climate change discussions that I have ever listened to.

[@iamthewelcher]

Amen and A..men!!! Thanks for your courage and service to humanity sir!!

[@comesahorseman]

"Apocalypse Never." Pick up a copy and give it a read. Indeed, there is no climate crisis. Pollution deserves our attention, not CO2.

[@awkwarddude]

Indeed. In our Southern Colorado area given our arid climate and windy conditions, look at any fence or ditch and the accumulated blowing trash is disgusting. We the People don't care any more, we just buy, buy, buy and throw old stuff "away" in total ignorance that there is no such thing as "away". The refuse has to go somewhere and if not in a "landfill" to be covered by more dirt displaced from somewhere to cover it, it haphazardly blows around the countryside in unsightly piles. Indeed, we have to deal with the refuse generated when we "use up" items in our everyday lives. Eventually it will have to come down to protocols demanding that if we buy something new to replace something old and used up, the old item has to have a pathway to recycling and repurposing and remanufacturing. That's only common sense. Which sadly, is all to uncommon. Remembering the "gar-barge" of several years ago that was floating off Manhattan that no one wanted to deal with. They had no place to process it so they loaded it on a barge and floated it off the coast. I don't remember what became of it. But we haven't slowed down our consumption of "stuff" any I'm sure. No easy solutions! Thank you, Comes a Horseman, for bring up the subject!

[@Jc-ms5vv]

already in the midst of the 6th mass extinction!

[@robrechtsaski7458]

Composition of air According to NASA*. gases in Earth's atmosphere include: Nitrogen - 78 % Oxygen - 21 % Argon - 0.93 % Carbon dioxide (C02)- 0.04 % = 400ppm Of o.o4 % Co2 -95% comes from nature (volcanoes/oceans/vegetation/animals etc...) -5% from human activity Human C02 in the air = 0.0016% !! and that 0.0016% is the C02 percentage they want to reduce to ....zero !! to save the climate on earth ! how crazy can it get !!! 'climate change issues' are marketeerd on us .....it is a business construct CO2 is a building block of nature ...as is water ....plants need water, CO2, sunshine etc *Earth's Atmosphere: Compositioon, Climate & Weather | Space www.space.com/17683-earth-atmosphere.html#:~:text=Composition%20of%20air,Argon%20%E2%80%94%200.93%20percent scroll to the bottom .. bonus: 'Climate change study on coral reef fish was '100 per cent wrong'' KZbin kzbin.info/www/bejne/rouUiKGEjb5kitE If climate change started with the crowning of climate Pope... al gore the first.....DID THE CLIMATE, before his climate heighness' illuminating and very lucrative reign, NOT CHANGE ?? Was the climate of the days, months, decenniums and centuries...all the same ?? Or did al gore got himself the gold metal of gaslichting stupidy... for the ages to come !! One thing is certain .....he got a lot of money from this climate BS : Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa - WORLD PROPERTY JOURNAL Global News Center www.worldpropertyjournal.com/featured-columnists/celebrity-homes-column-al-gore-tipper-gore-oprah-winfrey-michael-douglas-christopher-lloyd-fred-couples ...and doesn't seems to care about his own inconvienent truth tellings concerning cathastrophic floodings !! Climate BS overview: 1970 Climate cooling - ice age coming (Al Gore) 1990 Climate warming - pole ice would completly be gone by 2013-2014 (Al Gore) rising of the oceans 2000 Climate change (Al Gore) soon many cities under water inconvenient truth 2010 Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa 2020 Obama Buys $14 Million Ocean-view Villa Other climate change nutsos owning million dollar ocean estates: john kerry, gates Lol If you could play on the stock exchange -just betting on change (either up or down)- you would always win ☺

[@robrechtsaski7458]

@@awkwarddude Composition of air According to NASA*. gases in Earth's atmosphere include: Nitrogen - 78 % Oxygen - 21 % Argon - 0.93 % Carbon dioxide (C02)- 0.04 % = 400ppm Of o.o4 % Co2 -95% comes from nature (volcanoes/oceans/vegetation/animals etc...) -5% from human activity Human C02 in the air = 0.0016% !! and that 0.0016% is the C02 percentage they want to reduce to ....zero !! to save the climate on earth ! how crazy can it get !!! 'climate change issues' are marketeerd on us .....it is a business construct CO2 is a building block of nature ...as is water ....plants need water, CO2, sunshine etc *Earth's Atmosphere: Compositioon, Climate & Weather | Space www.space.com/17683-earth-atmosphere.html#:~:text=Composition%20of%20air,Argon%20%E2%80%94%200.93%20percent scroll to the bottom .. bonus: 'Climate change study on coral reef fish was '100 per cent wrong'' KZbin kzbin.info/www/bejne/rouUiKGEjb5kitE If climate change started with the crowning of climate Pope... al gore the first.....DID THE CLIMATE, before his climate heighness' illuminating and very lucrative reign, NOT CHANGE ?? Was the climate of the days, months, decenniums and centuries...all the same ?? Or did al gore got himself the gold metal of gaslichting stupidy... for the ages to come !! One thing is certain .....he got a lot of money from this climate BS : Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa - WORLD PROPERTY JOURNAL Global News Center www.worldpropertyjournal.com/featured-columnists/celebrity-homes-column-al-gore-tipper-gore-oprah-winfrey-michael-douglas-christopher-lloyd-fred-couples ...and doesn't seems to care about his own inconvienent truth tellings concerning cathastrophic floodings !! Climate BS overview: 1970 Climate cooling - ice age coming (Al Gore) 1990 Climate warming - pole ice would completly be gone by 2013-2014 (Al Gore) rising of the oceans 2000 Climate change (Al Gore) soon many cities under water inconvenient truth 2010 Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa 2020 Obama Buys $14 Million Ocean-view Villa Other climate change nutsos owning million dollar ocean estates: john kerry, gates Lol If you could play on the stock exchange -just betting on change (either up or down)- you would always win ☺ The ....politics of climate change ! Not the science ! These ignorant climate change parrots don't understand that climate change is a fabricated crisis. A hoax which started within think tanks (social engineering) .... ..and was force fed/propagandized through the establishment mass media to the public. Climate change is interest/power driven, not a science based crisis ! The hypocrit gravytrain science community, which knows better, is pressured and blackmailed to play along ! Every dissident scientist is muzzled and censored by the bought and paid for establisment mainstream media and academia. Their psychopathic billionaire overlords seek to make even more money, rule out competition and roll out their fascist oppresive agenda 21-30 on the world ! IN Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Climatism “IN Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.“ - Club of Rome, premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?” - Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP People don't understand that climate change is a fabricated crisis. A hoax which started within think tanks (social engineering) .... ..and was force fed/propagandized through the establishment mass media to the public. Climate change is interest/power driven, not a science based crisis ! The hypocrit gravytrain science community, which knows better, is pressured and blackmailed to play along ! Every dissident scientist is muzzled and censored by the bought and paid for establisment mainstream media and academia. Their psychopathic billionaire overlords seek to make even more money, rule out competition and roll out their fascist oppresive agenda 21-30 on the world ! '‘The Great Reset’: World leaders to harness COVID and pursue 'sinister' climate agenda' op KZbin kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZbcnIV7dtGMick It is a anti-human cult, destroying progressing society ...towards depopulation !! ....

[@robrechtsaski7458]

@@Jc-ms5vv Composition of air According to NASA*. gases in Earth's atmosphere include: Nitrogen - 78 % Oxygen - 21 % Argon - 0.93 % Carbon dioxide (C02)- 0.04 % = 400ppm Of o.o4 % Co2 -95% comes from nature (volcanoes/oceans/vegetation/animals etc...) -5% from human activity Human C02 in the air = 0.0016% !! and that 0.0016% is the C02 percentage they want to reduce to ....zero !! to save the climate on earth ! how crazy can it get !!! 'climate change issues' are marketeerd on us .....it is a business construct CO2 is a building block of nature ...as is water ....plants need water, CO2, sunshine etc *Earth's Atmosphere: Compositioon, Climate & Weather | Space www.space.com/17683-earth-atmosphere.html#:~:text=Composition%20of%20air,Argon%20%E2%80%94%200.93%20percent scroll to the bottom .. bonus: 'Climate change study on coral reef fish was '100 per cent wrong'' KZbin kzbin.info/www/bejne/rouUiKGEjb5kitE If climate change started with the crowning of climate Pope... al gore the first.....DID THE CLIMATE, before his climate heighness' illuminating and very lucrative reign, NOT CHANGE ?? Was the climate of the days, months, decenniums and centuries...all the same ?? Or did al gore got himself the gold metal of gaslichting stupidy... for the ages to come !! One thing is certain .....he got a lot of money from this climate BS : Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa - WORLD PROPERTY JOURNAL Global News Center www.worldpropertyjournal.com/featured-columnists/celebrity-homes-column-al-gore-tipper-gore-oprah-winfrey-michael-douglas-christopher-lloyd-fred-couples ...and doesn't seems to care about his own inconvienent truth tellings concerning cathastrophic floodings !! Climate BS overview: 1970 Climate cooling - ice age coming (Al Gore) 1990 Climate warming - pole ice would completly be gone by 2013-2014 (Al Gore) rising of the oceans 2000 Climate change (Al Gore) soon many cities under water inconvenient truth 2010 Al Gore Buys $8.9 Million Ocean-view Villa 2020 Obama Buys $14 Million Ocean-view Villa Other climate change nutsos owning million dollar ocean estates: john kerry, gates Lol If you could play on the stock exchange -just betting on change (either up or down)- you would always win ☺

[@michelleochinero1813]

Tony Heller and Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers have been saying this for years.

[@jessefontenot9846]

Happer has been saying it for 2 decades. Just shows how easily those who distribute or information can ignore people.

[@dkvikingkd233]

@@jessefontenot9846 and Richard Lindzen

[@ozgal606]

So have many others. Plenty of evidence that the powers that be are absolute scammers.

[@jessefontenot9846]

@@dkvikingkd233 YES! Lindzen goes straight beast mode when debunking climate change. Happer is calm and smirks when addressing it but Lindzen treats it with contempt and rightfully so. Love him.

[@brantpam222]

Yes, all the people mentioned here are fantastic, but Tony Heller reveals something completely different than the others (although I’ll have to familiarize myself with Davidson). All fronts to dispel any authoritative action taken to “save the planet” from processes that have taken place since the creation of it and that humans have been mitigating since the dawn of the species, must be defended vigorously.

[@petermathieson5692]

I would pay money, and quite a lot by my standards, to have John Kerry, AOC, Kamala Harris, Justin Trudeau and a host of "woke" others sit through this lecture.

[@dnormore1814]

If they ever did attend, they would travel via private jet.

[@brianpetrini]

Amen brother!! my guns emit a lot of co2!

[@rd4871]

They want us to live in dumpsters eating bugs. This will not change their mind.

[@Oscarphone]

Just having them sit and listen to this would do nothing. they would simply walk out the leading what they believed when they walked in. It would be far more useful to have all of them on stage debating Mr. Happer. they wouldn't stand a chance and they could be exposed as the fools that they are.

[@jlondon158]

@@Oscarphone A debate between God-fearing science and the theomanic athiests ( oxymoronic - I know - but it is all oxymoronic -- isn't this the definition of Good vs Evil ? )

[@arc-design845]

You are a hero William. Glad to see science and common sense still exists. Great work.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Happer is not a climate scientist and has no formal training in climate science. He has written no scientific papers on climate change science and is debunked by 97% of the world's climate scientists who have, in addition to the 170 major scientific institutions and academies of science who publicly endorse the consensus findings. Happer's specialty is optics, not climate. Happer is refuted by NASA, NOAA, the World Meteorological Organization, the American Meteorological Society, the National Academy of Sciences, the IPCC and 165 other major scientific institutions. As director of the C02 Coalition, Happer for years was funded to push for MORE consumption of fossil fuels, not less. That should tell you something. skepticalscience.com/William_Happer_arg.htm

[@arc-design845]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 The reason we don't trust politicians is because they go along with what they are told and don't know the facts. Humans are only responsible for 3 to 5% of CO2 emissions, the CO2 level is very low compared to 600,000,000 years ago when it was 6000 PPM, it is currently 400 PPM. Most of the carbon in the earth came from decayed vegetation, which got its carbon from the atmosphere. The quantum mechanics of the carbon cycle shows that nature is a self-regulating system and that fossil fuels are stored solar energy. -Photosynthesis (the suns energy of heat and light, EME) causes the outer electrons in the Carbon (C) atom to move to a higher level when extracted from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) combining it with water (H2O) to build its structure. A bi product of this process is oxygen (O2), which it expels into the atmosphere. The process is easily reversed with a spark. The Carbon based cellulose combines with O2, the electrons return to their original lower level, burn and expels light and heat (solar energy), CO2 and water vapour. Cycle complete. The carbon (C) in fossil fuels originally came from the atmosphere.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@arc-design845 Over 40% of our annual C02 emissions are NOT absorbed by plants or any other natural sink. They're simply left to accumulate in the atmosphere. Decade after decade. Century after century. It's the accumulation of that "tiny percentage" that's the crux of our problem. Before humans came along, C02 was in balance with the earth's natural filtering system. We've simply upset that balance and exceeded critical mass. High C02 in the ancient past was always caused by massive tectonic upheaval, from the break-up of continents. This upheaval would fuel volcanic eruptions for not just days or weeks or months, but for CENTURIES. The Siberian Traps (Google it) is a prime example. 252 million years ago eruptions here continued for thousands of years, spewing trillions of tons of C02 into the atmosphere. That drove equatorial temperatures to 140 degrees, which caused a mass extinction event. Over 90% of all marine animals and 2 out of 3 land animals died out from the heat. High C02 like that is NOT NORMAL. Unless, of course, you like 140 degree temperatures and icecaps that inundate part of your country with meltwater.

[@arc-design845]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Provide references to your claims and I'll have a look at them.

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

​@@arc-design845the earth is less than 6000 years old. you have no way to know the earth is millions of years old much less know the amount of CO2.

[@moroniholm87]

I enjoy being informed. Thank you Hillsdale.

[@TheBigEasyConservative]

My 2 year old Godson and my soon-to-be-born will be attending Hillsdale! And all gratitude to Dr Happer! I've listened to him for some years now. He's the best. And it's essential to get this message out.

[@petersimmons3654]

They'll be lucky if it still exists, the future is all up for grabs, only the simple minded think everythging wwill remain the same. Next year yopu'll be in for some surprises. May make some of you run screaming to mummy. The message being? That extinction is already happening, more than a thousand species monthly go extinct, and all qua;lified scientists know the great extibnction event is happening and is due to homo sapiens, the dumb ape. None dumber than those who will nopt see.

[@moonlightgator541]

So as always, the truth is an opposite of what They tell you.

[@cristinataliani5619]

Yoy Sir Are Ignorant!!!

[@cristinataliani5619]

Did people pay money to hear this jerk!!!!

[@xarastewartmusic]

Shocking, isn't it lol

[@ladycactus110]

@@cristinataliani5619 who is Yoy Sir???

[@GregoryAnderson]

That is true of yourself. Therefore I cannot trust what You Are Saying.

[@elizabethmorgan1856]

Thank you Hillsdale for continuing to provide excellent speakers and education. I so appreciate what you are doing!!

[@larrydugan1441]

Richard Fenyman, one of the great minds of the 20th century said this : "Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"

[@ricoman7981]

Feynman also said “I’d rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned”

[@shangri-la-la-la]

Subjective interpretation of objective observation.

[@larrydugan1441]

@@shangri-la-la-la nothing subjective about that observation. Anyone that thinks they understand what is happening with the climate has no comprehension of the complexity. www.sciencenews.org/article/science-top-10-erroneous-results-mistakes

[@euphenegiafarrerahah8182]

Fenyman nailed it!

[@jean-marclamothe8859]

I love Tony Heller too 😉

[@merlinthewizard3680]

Thanks KZbin for the "context" from Wikipedia LOLOLOL. Genius Princeton professor vs Wikipedia = Context. Lol

[@warrenspeak3594]

haha - just like advertising - I think I am becoming immune to these things - I totally missed the 'context' until I read this comment! :D

[@sentientflower7891]

He ain't a genius.

[@MM-br8tt]

Thought police back at it again.

[@sentientflower7891]

@@MM-br8tt boo hoo!

[@JK-ip2xj]

Consider Wikipedia+a grain of salt!

[@paulg444]

Great to see a real climate scientist with knowledge and integrity. The Left just cant let go of this one, too much Oligarichical corporate collectivist interest at stake.

[@tonycatman]

Would you consider some evidence from a conservative, who also has knowledge and integrity, with absolutely no financial interest or dependency ?

[@paulg444]

@@tonycatman The totalitarian Left never goes away, they are a curse. Forever devouring the tax payer forever enriching the oligarchs.

[@cindyjohnson6266]

Thank you Hillsdale! Mr Happer is wonderful and has a great sense of humor!!! God bless you Mr. Happer.

[@smithdesignwerx]

I love how Google is disputing this scientist with an article from Wikipedia, what a joke the left has become.

[@molswi47]

Why do Americans have to politicize everything?

[@wade5941]

@@molswi47 Ask the European Union the same question.

[@RaiceGeriko]

@@molswi47 We don't. Leftists did that.

[@johng5284]

@@molswi47 the further left you go the more politicized everything is and the more collectivist people are, to the point where you reach totalitarian collectivism. The further right you go the less political and more individualistic people are, to the point where you reach anarchocapitalism

[@urbanstuff9950]

I am glad people are finally noticing this! *except beijing biden NPC fans...

[@heidibee501]

When l first started researching real climate change l came across a video by Dr. Happer. It was interesting but my lack of understanding got in the way. I kept seeking and learning. Now when l see this video with Dr. Happer l am getting so much more from it because l am familiar with many of the references. To everyone responsible for producing this fine video, including Dr. Happer, thank you.

[@angelagonimavalero7700]

Thank you for your good comment, the more I search the more I learn and understand.

[@kenkeyes8148]

Who's watching this sooner than they wanted to because they expect it to be removed?

[@abashedsanctimony154]

I'm sure it has surpassed comprehension of the atheist pseudo-scientists, but climate change means that the universe doesn't exist. To us at least, it has no bearing nor effect. If the laws of physics that state matter cannot be destroyed nor created are true, our earth system is enclosed and doesn't interact with any other point or location outside our earth. The evolutionistic black hole theory: that energy and matter is transferred through vortex portals.. Stare cannot be created nor destroyed, which really causes holes in their theory. Stars according to the Holy Bible, state God created the Stars on day four. These do His bidding and mark times and seasons. If one is destroyed, the star has fallen (fallen angels). The expanding universe is that in which the Heavens that God created are expanding. But this would disprove 'evolution', by them stating this and that the inflation theory having any relevance. They state, the earth is a sphere and the universe is flat (mathematically; wouldn't this be contradictory to their current models of the expansion/inflation theory imaginations?). It's simply an inversion of the truth. The earth is flat and a circle, and the Universe is simply a flat systematic covering to the earth. Also with an existential universe that cannot be seen nor understood. Yet the earth is flat, and unmovable, fixed. Everything on the earth lies below the Heavens. There is no south pole in that case. Which is why each nation has a claim to the "south pole". On a circular map, each nation that marks the coast line could in essence, claim a part of the Circular Antarctic. Also china isn't a valid reason to change the earth into a globalist communistocracy in order to save a planet that the globalists are actively destroying through resource consumption.

[@garysarela4431]

Do you realize we are smothering ourselves with carbon dioxide emissions? At around 1,000ppm, expect reductions in higher-level cognitive abilities, inflammation, bone demineralization, kidney calcification and oxidative stress. Source: Jacobson (2019), "Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide" Under a business as usual scenario, CO2 levels will be around 930ppm by year 2100.

[@kenkeyes8148]

@@garysarela4431 Tell Greta to tell Xi.

[@garysarela4431]

@@kenkeyes8148 Good point, but the US is still the largest cumulative emitter of CO2 over history.

[@Fancy2000]

Fascinating insight, ty Prof Happer, debunking all the global warming myths

[@williamedgarperrigo9813]

It’s all political.

[@ProudAussie23]

100% ...in many years to come this will finally be acknowledged

[@skipmurf2]

Therefore dishonest!

[@tovarashumatrics3217]

As much I like to deny the "science" of climate change (son/daughter of global warming/ozone holes) I`m afraid you`re right. Therefore I hate. I`m racist now? :)

[@sranney1]

Money

[@GregoryAnderson]

The Universal "all" in your briefest of brief comments indicates that Your Own Opinion about Climate Change must therefore be "political". And I believe that is true, that your denial of actual Climate changes (including Ice Ages) is pure bunk. Get real dude, as well as all the rest of the fantasy-thinkers like yourself.

[@paulschooley7364]

MR Happer is fantastic, thank you.

[@mourningwarbler]

Plant more trees. CO2 is not the problem, but all the toxic stuff in air, water, ground. Solar panels have a lot of cadmium which could really destroy a lot of farmland.

[@Mr2006explorer]

Not only that, but a lot of trees ,wildlife etc. have to be destroyed to make room for these Solar pAnels, it's ridiculous!

[@litestreamer]

And Bill Gates with David Keith want to release sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to 'combat Co2'. They've been spraying nano particles, heavy metals, bacteria and other biologic and AI agents for decades.

[@comesahorseman]

👍👍

[@hypocrisystinks2860]

The hills in lower Ohio are being exposed. They are just plowing them down everywhere here. They are removing what we need to breath. That and with the chemtrails they really trying to take our breath. Silence it and stop the world, who they choose to stop breathing for life. They think they are God. But are Demonized instead. Devil followers, not Godly. Never got away from the devil as they grew up. Feel sorry for those who still think it isn't good vs evil. God help you see. In Jesus's name, Amen.

[@mourningwarbler]

@@hypocrisystinks2860 Shawnee State Forest? Terrible. My dad had some land strip mined in Belmont, Ohio; then he went back and planted trees. (Electric cars use fossil fuels, for crying out loud. Who's going to clean up the old wind farms?)

[@Redheadedlady55]

~This is....education that is amazing to hear!! Thank you Hillsdale.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics.

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

​@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481and he doesn't get paid by the elites including politicians to push the money making scheme called climate change. you are a naive fool if you believe it.

[@t-bone3657]

What has he said that can be proven false? Thanks

[@cindykaegi1855]

The lecture was very good and very interesting, everyone she listen to this Thank you Mr.William Happer . It was so interesting, and very truthful, I really enjoyed it, and learned so much more.

[@robertljohnson8965]

All politicians say "the scientists say...". I say "some scientists say this" William Happer.

[@Hustada]

Yeah that 97% paper they cite all the time for this subject is bogus and consistently misinterpreted.

[@garyleslie594]

The so called climate experts said Texas will get warmer and drier and they would never see snow again. They decided to go with Bird Blenders and Solar Panels. How did that so called expert advice turn out. On page 74 of the IPCC's AR3 report published in 2001 it says " Due to the fact that the climate is non-linear and chaotic, it is not possible to predict future climate states" Unfortunately climate science has been hijacked by politicians and gravy train scientists like Catherine Haho and Michael Mann who invent invisible climate catastrophes to continue receiving gov't grants to keep them employed. ENGO's like the WWF, Sierra Club, Suzuki Foundation and GreenPeace do the same to collect donations from the uneducated public. Back to the IPCC. They use RCP 8.5 which overly exaggerates the potential warming of the planet due to CO2. Now governments are using CO2 to further tax us peons based on junk science.

[@kimlibera663]

This is corrupt & this is the lesson of political scientists-how to use words & phrases carefully from Kerry to Obama--the scientists say. My question which scientists? I can name more that have really debunked the stuff.

[@janetgreene1897]

Excellent lecture. More information like this should be shared by media sources. At least present this information so young people can look further and make up their own mind

[@ericsandsogranite8138]

No, it's propaganda.

[@Bonding_Neutral]

Well, bad news sells more, and people in a constant state of fear are far easier to coax out of their money

[@goygoddess2822]

Thank you for a quality presentation! This is so very needed these days!

[@richdavis1973]

How many more in Texas would have died without gasoline powered cars.

[@garysarela4431]

Air pollution from fossil fuels are responsible for "an excess mortality rate of 3.61 (2.96-4.21) million per year" .. "a rapid phaseout of fossil-fuel-related emissions and major reductions of other anthropogenic sources are needed to save millions of lives." www.pnas.org/content/116/15/7192

[@TheBatugan77]

@@garysarela4431 Pull the string in the back. Maybe the doll will say something else.

[@itsmorphed6416]

@@garysarela4431 watch this video again .

[@2004done-Stll]

@@TheBatugan77 (pull the string again) No, it broke back in the 70's when "Global Cooling" was changed into "Global Warming" in time for 1992 Rio 'Earth Summit" although the IPCC had to work VERY, VERY hard to bail our world out after the sea level rose its predicted three-feet, nobody noticed because globalists (being the selfless financiers of science protection) still prefer anonymity in saving the world that way AGAIN, almost as much as wars.

[@mikedeitz2924]

@@2004done-Stll 40+ years of 12 years to fix it , They still cling to others for their thoughts to be validated.

[@Damfinone]

Titled: “how to think...” because apparently we don’t know how. 😂🤷🏼‍♀️ Joking aside, this is why I’m no longer a democrat. I sent money to Bernie Sanders presidential campaign, regretfully. We may have a problem with pollution but not climate change which seems an opportunistic exaggeration to me. And if these entities truly cared about the environment, they would be supportive of traditional, multi crop, rural farmers. Instead they’re squashing them out. If they truly cared, they’d admonish China instead of celebrate them. If they truly cared about the environment, they’d penalize manufacturing companies creating forever chemicals and single use plastics. Instead they foster these monopolies! Biden has Tom Vilsack of Monsanto in his administration for goodness sake!

[@deadmanswife3625]

Bernie. Collecting $ like the girl scouts. And no cookies

[@aisaxonawiat6484]

It is their intention to eliminate property ownership and drive everyone out of the rural areas and into the cities in to stack and pack housing where according to their theories, you won't need to own anything and You won't desire it and what you do have, will be leased to you.

[@b2manufacturing]

Exactly, how to think, not what to think

[@scotparrish9772]

Bravo and welcome to the new winning heroes’ side. Stop EVIL. Stop AOC, the fraudster leader of fraudsters.

[@aisaxonawiat6484]

@Lily M Powell Powell ..... But but but but but this time, they have guaranteed that this time, communism is going to work!!

[@RodMartinJr]

Climate always changes, and most often changes in fairly regular cycles. Right now, we're living in the Modern Warm Period of the Holocene's major warm period, 1,000-year cycle. We've had a warm period peak ten times during the Holocene. Our Modern arrived right on schedule, by nature. But the fact that is the *_coldest_* of the 10 major warm periods indicates that CO2 either has negligible effect on global temperatures or zero effect. The correlation between modern warming and modern increases in CO2 is *_purely accidental!_* No cause-and-effect relationship!

[@gazmasonik2411]

12000 year solar flare cycle?

[@dragonstaye4557]

Not according to experts such as Graham Hancock 👀

[@sentientflower7891]

Pollution good! Death good!

[@sentientflower7891]

@Jason Bourne awwww.

[@RodMartinJr]

@@gazmasonik2411 Based on what?

[@M_K171]

This takes me back to my Geosciences degree. What I got out of it was how resilient the Earth is, and how resilient life is. I care about the environment by not littering, or by controlling invasive populations, balancing ecosystems, resource management, clean rivers from factory chemicals, not building housing developments near potential landslides, etc., but everything overall is going to be just fine. I also read a study that we wouldn’t be able to cause some kind of “runaway greenhouse effect” even if we burned all of the oil reserves on the planet, and there is no shortage of that either.

[@realLoganMoody]

I'm beginning to think whenever there's some sort of "disclaimer" under a video that means it goes against something big tech wants.

[@BucketWheat]

I get both "amused" and Frustrated, when I hear the Alarmist Reactions in the Media about such things as "This is the Most Rain in FIFTY YEARS!!" Which simply means... we had the SAME Weather 50 years ago..!! We have Maps for all of America that show the "100 Year Flood Plane"... showing how high the waters have flooded within the Past Hundred Years... (And also a 500 year map..) But the Oceans did not flood the Coastlines, and the water ran off into the Seas... and we are still in approximately the very same weather constants as before...

[@tonycatman]

If you assert that you are experiencing the same weather patterns as before, you are asking for a type of evidence which is unreasonable. i.e. every year would have to be successively more extreme than the last. Weather patterns don't work in a strictly linear fashion. It is more useful to look at a smoothed pattern. For example the average over the last 10 years vs the 10 year rolling averages for all other years. Incidentally, I fully agree with you about the alarmist reactions and the nonsense evidence found in headlines. They don't inform good decisions. Neither do AOC or Thunberg. If these were the only things I ever looked at, or listened to I'd be equally skeptical. Would you consider looking at some evidence from a qualified conservative geologist who has read hundreds of papers ? I'll point you at some videos if you are.

[@garyviehe9365]

@Jason Bourne Exactly, Example, why did Obama bail out Solindra, (who had contributed millions to his campaign) with 50 million dollars, and they still failed. Who ended up dividing the 50 million from tax payers?

[@cdmarshall7448]

So I just did a retro check for the fun of it, {3/9/21} Australia average temperature was 30 Celsius. On that very same day 60 years ago Australia’s average temperature was 31 Celsius. Absolute proof that CO2 warming is inverse to the linear time lapse rate. >That was a physics joke if you were a physicist you'd be gut busting right now (I hope).

[@tonycatman]

@@cdmarshall7448 I reckon most people are going to take your comment seriously. Unless we repeatedly train ourselves, for some reason, us humans all think in strictly linear terms.

[@JamesSchmidt-by3wu]

I tried to do the math on the volume of water that flows into the ocean every day from the Amazon River which is the largest River in the world. The calculator did not have enough spaces to do the math. 'Somehow' the ocean hasn't risen????? Have we as mankind forgotten about evaporation?

[@HobbitHomes263]

If a model cannot reliably, consistently reproduce known, historical measurements, the model is flawed. What drives me nutsis when a "Believer" starts quoting "data" from a model I know immediately they have noidea how to think the research. COmputer models do NOT produce "data" they produce conclusions.

[@russue]

They produce guesswork....garbage in garbage out !!

[@hughallbrooks8369]

This guy is a tool A disinformation specialists Man is facing total biosperic collapse and here comes a climate change denial The problem is mainly methane release and ozone layer protection almost GONE Go to Dane Wiggington Geoenginerring watch.org Don't listen to this professors obfuscated BS

[@budbud2509]

@@hughallbrooks8369 ........... U do know that Methane does not stay as Methane in the atmosphere it oxidises ?

[@hughallbrooks8369]

@@budbud2509 IDK the specifics go to Dane Wiggington Geoenginerring watch.org He s been screaming biosphere collapse for 10 plus years The facts are so horrific I don't want to dwell on them

[@mikedeitz2924]

@@budbud2509 Bet Hugh thinks Nuclear reactors are spweing C02 and not water vapor .

[@kenmarriott5772]

Love this talk. What a relieve from President Biden who has a difficulty getting a sentence out.

[@-ColorMehJewish-]

FACT: "The Consensus of Scientists" also believed the Earth was flat, and the center of the Universe.. at one point in time. Morale of the Story: Think for yourself

[@sentientflower7891]

Liar.

[@andysedlak1534]

It is actually just a rumor that educated people in the past thought that the earth was flat.

[@wade5941]

Plenty of examples of the "consensus" getting it completely wrong. Sometimes we are our own worst enemies.

[@sentientflower7891]

@@wade5941 there are plenty of Christians who lie to their audience because they know that their audience wants to hear lies.

[@andysedlak1534]

@@sentientflower7891 Everybody lies. No need to pretend otherwise.

[@randallwhite9139]

Thank you for a truly great presentation!

[@susanpodesta4200]

Great. Hope u get through brainwashed kids. Lots of luck. God Bless

[@rollwtide88]

Really would have liked to hear more questions answered from this speaker

[@abidanhernandez9778]

YES, DEFINATELY

[@vladtepes481]

Dr. Happer is a delightful and intelligent man. We have met on a few occasions.

[@stephanebeauregard4083]

He may be delightful and intelligent, but he appears to be deluded. His rebuttals to consensus climate science have been thoroughly debunked.

[@vladtepes481]

@@stephanebeauregard4083 I quite sure that it is you that is deluded. Scientifically, there is no "consensus climate science" Propaganda is not science.

[@stephanebeauregard4083]

@@vladtepes481 There is an collection of physical theories that explain the preponderance of the observable changes in the climate not only over the last 50-150 years, but also way back in geological time. I don't know how more "consensus" one could possibly get.

[@vladtepes481]

@@stephanebeauregard4083 After you get a Ph.D. in Geophysics you will realize what a fool you are. Consensus has nothing to do with science. Copernicus and Galileo went against the consensus but were right. In the present case there is not even scientific consensus largely because our understanding of the Earth is rather limited.

[@stephanebeauregard4083]

@@vladtepes481 I've got a PhD in Engineering already, thanks.

[@suzannehawes4168]

That presentation should be played in congress and government bodies around the world. It should also be played in high schools. Everyone send this to their representative at every level.

[@donalddodge1]

A very good presentation (complete with no BS), should be shared widely.

[@iamalmostanonymous]

20 minutes in and nothing but B.S. Breathing vs. Power Plants. Come on. Maybe account for volume and source/cycle. Acting as if scientists and engineers don't know solar/wind is intermittent. CO2 isn't a pollutant! Face palm. This is not science. This is a tribal appeal.

[@suzannespanier4492]

What a delightful presentation. Love the wise fathers.

[@aussielen3285]

One could argue that every boat, ship, tanker that’s placed onto the oceans would cause the water levels to rise..

[@mikedeitz2924]

Every Island created by China or Dubai as well.

[@alphaomega4252]

More Truth..thankyou.Sir

[@bryanst.martin7134]

@@mikedeitz2924 They added concrete but on top of material removed from the sea. Net zero gain?

[@bryanst.martin7134]

It does, immeasurably by our standards, yet they think they can change the climate. I compare it to a bunch of fleas on a Rhinos buttocks calculating how to steer it.

[@saiello2061]

The answer to sea level reduction then, is that people just need to stop floating their boats.... 👍

[@georgeengland1699]

Not a rebel, just normal common sense.

[@skepticalmom2948]

That was a fantastic lecture. Thank you for bringing that to KZbin !

[@janetp181]

Very interesting and informative. Nice to gain knowledge of co2. Thanks for the education.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 major scientific institutions that publicly endorse the consensus findings. Happer is not a climate scientist, has not been formally trained in climate science and has written no scientific papers on climate change. His specialty is optics.

[@jeffpizzuli9680]

Thank you Dr. Happer. Your brilliance is needed during this time of insanity

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Happer is debunked by 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists. Happer has no published climate change science papers and was not formally trained in climate change science.

[@jamesmabry5776]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Correction climate change pseudoscience.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@jamesmabry5776 Climate science is based on empirical evidence, confirmed and corroborated by multiple scientific papers. Pseudoscience is based on nothing. Happer has no evidence, which is why he hasn't published any papers on climate change. He'd never get beyond the peer review process.

[@jamesmabry5776]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 FACT: There is no such thing as future evidence. Prove me wrong.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@jamesmabry5776 That's too dumb of a comment to even bother with.

[@kenvandeburgt1232]

Every politician should be required to watch this presentation.

[@bryanb.386]

The already know this, they either are profiting or they are a zealot environmentalist who believe that the population should be cut down by billions of people.

[@ladycactus110]

A certain 3-letter person would not understand any of this.

[@ozgal606]

@@ladycactus110 that person doesn't remember his own families names most of the time 🤣

[@brantpam222]

@@ozgal606, I think the Lady meant AOC, but I believe you’re correct too in your assumption. 😜

[@qwerty90615]

@@ladycactus110 aoc (she doesn't like capitalism) doesn't need to understand, because she cares.

[@aaronjohnston1584]

This is the most articulate argument against climate change that I've ever heard.

[@stephanebeauregard4083]

Nope. The scientific basis for Happer's position is extremely flimsy.

[@aaronjohnston1584]

@@stephanebeauregard4083 based on what?

[@stephanebeauregard4083]

@@aaronjohnston1584 Happer's main arguments were presented in article some years ago and were thoroughly rebutted. Just drill down into the references on the Wikipedia entry for Happer.

[@JAEJourneyAroundEurope]

A professor with a great sense of humor, and a wealth of what should be common knowledge.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics.

[@JukeBoxHero82]

Just phenomenal stuff.

[@2DXYSU]

A great and wise man. There are so few.

[@kityfitz]

And fewer still that are willing to stand up and be counted. That’s a pity for all of us.

[@gazmasonik2411]

How can 40 people give this a thumbs down? This should be shown in every school instead of kids being told they're going to die because of their fellow humans using fossil fuel.

[@karinmaryturner]

Thank you for people with common sense

[@robertplatte5700]

up to 60 now, and yes you are right this info should be mandatory in schools and the general mainstream watching populace

[@Jc-ms5vv]

Meanwhile we're having endless wildfires and floods, icecaps/glaciers/ permafrost are melting at alarming rates, weather events destroying our crops and methane bubbling out of the arctic and people still believe bullshit like this!

[@wade5941]

@@Jc-ms5vv Alarming rates? Not really.

[@johnmartin2017]

@@Jc-ms5vv look at the timeline records for the weather events you mention. They do NOT correlate with what you are implying at all. You are watching scary advertisements. But even if weather events were becoming more frequent and catastrophic (and they are not) how do you come to the conclusion that the fact that Global temperatures are up about 1 degree C in the past hundred years would be to blame? The ads don't explain that either they are made just to scare people.

[@hlf_coder6272]

I see our glorious commissars at KZbin have dutifully displayed the collective’s official stance on this topic in a big banner. Well done comrades! We must keep objectivity and intellectual curiosity to a bare minimum in utopia

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Sadly, when it comes to William Happer, fact-checking rebuttals are required. William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics.

[@hartfully]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 "climate scientists" were renamed recently by universities taking govt grants to give the controlling govt what it wants. They used to be called atmospheric physicists and were free to do science ethically. That is why 97% get the results you talk about; funding and tenure. In the state of education today, it is likely these "climate 'scientists'" believe what they are producing in models. Dark ages do come and go though.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@hartfully That has no basis in reality whatsoever, although fossil fuel industry propaganda tries really hard to make you believe that. Funding is given to scientists to gather data, not prove climate change. Conclusions are reached after the data is analyzed, not before, and funders have no say in the outcomes nor their interpretations. No scientist can simply make things up to satisfy anyone's "agenda." Any data gathered must be PROVEN with quantitative evidence. The evidence then must be peer reviewed, published, debated with other scientists and then replicated and corroborated by others. You can't cheat without being caught. And if you're caught, you lose your funding, your reputation and your career. Michael Mann's hockey stick data is the perfect illustrative example. His findings have been corroborated and replicated by over 30 different scientists and scientific institutions worldwide and have been affirmed by the National Academy of Sciences. To reject such empirical evidence in favor of someone (Happer) who took funding from the fossil fuel industry when he led the C02 Coalition to promote the use of MORE fossil fuels and whose expertise isn't climate but OPTICS speaks volumes about how the fossil fuel industry's insidious and ubiquitous propaganda has influenced you. Check in with your critical thinking skills, my friend. 99.9% of climate science has nothing to do with models. Thermometer readings are not models. Neither is data from worldwide tide gauges, satellite altimeters, spectroscopic analysis, isotopic analysis, measurements of solar irradiance, orbital eccentricity and changes in earth's axial tilt and precession, not radiance measurements from the atmosphere, not aerosol measurements, not differentiation measurements between natural C02 and C02 produced by combusted fossil fuels, not gravitational changes from shrinking icecaps, not proxy evidence, etc. And models have in reality been extraordinarily accurate in predicting the long term trends. Being off by 1/10th or 2/10ths of a degree isn't "wrong," as fossil fuel propaganda tries to convince you that it is. 19 of the last 20 years were the warmest on record. Our continued warming and all of its climate effects were predicted over 40 years ago.

[@hartfully]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 You can word your "reality" to the extreme and it still is nonsense. But go ahead waste your time, the disclaimer on every youtube rebuttal of the established narrative says it all.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@hartfully The KZbin disclaimer is attached to videos that contain proven misinformation, just like this one with Happer. Would you like me to tell you all the things he gets wrong? See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: WILLIAM HAPPER, at the Skeptical Science website. Over 88000 climate studies published in the last ten years agree that climate change is being driven by human activity, and the consensus is now 99.9%, according to the latest audit of the scientific literature by Cornell University. That's up from the 97% consensus, which was itself validated by seven corroborating studies. Not a single scientific institution with national or international standing rejects the consensus. You have every right to believe the 0.1% of climate scientists who disagree. It's a free country.

[@higherandhigher5848]

A great talk. Thank you.

[@paulmchugh9738]

I'm 67 years old and i remember in grade school we were being taught that the earth was going to freeze and the US would have to go to Mexico to survive. Now it's global warming. Texas anyone?

[@jacdale]

In the 1970's science was 6:1 warming cooling. You were miseducated. journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml

[@camhamster3891]

Oh, it's cold somewhere, so warming can't be happening. Did you make it past grade school?

[@dannybrooks2784]

Don't listen to these children I was taught in grade school that there was a ice sheet a mile thick in what is now New York City!! We know from the marks " striations" left in the granite in Central Park. The Earth has been getting warmer for 10,000 years, all that ice melted and is still melting this is way before we started burning fossil fuels. Yes I do remember the news paper headlines about another ice age coming because of fossil fuels.

[@jacobkerwood401]

Gotta love the Wikipedia article propaganda

[@RodMartinJr]

Yes. The encyclopedia that anyone can edit. But if you correct anything to do with the propaganda narrative, your correction is reversed within seconds. That's why I stopped helping Wikipedia and started writing books, including #1 Weather Bestseller, *_Climate Basics: Nothing to Fear._*

[@suerahn3272]

Their propaganda is a reason why I NEVER go to a Wikipedia article nor do I give it any credence.

[@RodMartinJr]

@@suerahn3272 Yet, Wikipedia can be a good source for research on non-controversial topics. At the very least, they provide a rich list of sources for digging more deeply into a topic, even if the Wikipedia article is itself flawed. Sometimes knowing what our enemy thinks is a good way to help counter their lies -- especially if you know the basics of the topic about which they're lying.

[@suerahn3272]

@@RodMartinJr Nothing is non-controversial, everyone has a bias. However, I would agree that Wikipedia would be a source for the opposition's viewpoint. But I get that when I go to the MSM sites.

[@MgtowRubicon]

Q: "How to Think About Climate Change?" A: "Scam."

[@garyviehe9365]

MGTOW, Believe me, I understand what you 'think.' However, Climate Change is not a scam. Climate Change has been around since the beginning of time and will continue till the end of time. (Consider the Ice Age and the "Climate Change" that thawed the Ice Age). What is a "Scam" is the radical left trying to push their agenda of seeking power through Socialism trying to create fear by prophesying, "Global Warming is an existential threat to the people and the earth."

[@Homunculas]

@@garyviehe9365 Given the topic of this video you have to be rather obtuse to not acknowledge that the OP meant human caused climate change.

[@lwiimbokasweshi]

This Bali is really smart. I always enjoy his talks and what he presents

[@richtricky6832]

I believe in actual science therefore I believe professor William Happer. Finally some facts instead of fear mongering.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@jackmacdonald5418 Happer has been profoundly debunked in the scientific literature, which you can see for yourself at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: WILLIAM HAPPER. The Skeptical Science climate team there completely obliterates his talking points with links to the data that refute his views. Be aware that Happer is the former head of the CO2 Coalition, which has long been funded by the fossil fuel industry to promote the use of more gas and oil. ELEVEN separate studies confirm the scientific consensus on climate change, which is publicly endorsed by over 80 academies of science and all of the world's major scientific institutions, from NASA to NOAA to the World Meteorological Organization. It's why every nation on earth is a card-carrying member of the IPCC. In 2021, Cornell University audited the over 88000 climate studies published from 2012-2020 and tallied a 99.9% consensus that human activity, not nature, is warming the planet. Even Exxon's own scientists in leaked memos have acknowledged that combusted fossil fuels are warming the planet to a damaging degree. Happer, by contrast is part of the 0.1% of atmospheric scientists who disagree with the consensus. If 99 bridge engineers warn me not to cross a rickety bridge due to imminent collapse, I'm not sure how much credence I'm going to give to the one outlying engineer who tells me it's safe to cross, especially when he has been proven wrong so many times in the past. Give that some thought, my friend.

[@Madonnalitta1]

Great resource. I understand very little of 'climate science', which is in fact many scientific disciplines, but I do know when I'm being lied too. The 'climate science' is obviously heavily politicised.

[@me-yc9gr]

Climate science is people making computer models using only the things THEY are told to produce the results they want. Garbage in, garbage out.

[@irmadennington2773]

This is the truth, and i stand tall with him!

[@timbrundage8931]

That’s why the forest fires rejuvenate the growth in the forest! A very positive outcome! This has been a very important update for everyone to understand the environmental processes. Thank you for your time and scientific information! 🇺🇸The truth shall set you free to understand actual facts. Keepers of Liberty

[@martaalvarez4859]

Thank you for this wonderful lecture. I fell for the solar energy ideology and installed solar panels on my roof about 5 yrs ago, only to learn form Tesla recently that the panels loose capacity to store energy power year. What next? Have these 'geniuses' thought about the disposal of millions of millions of dead solar panels? That is only one aspect.

[@martaalvarez4859]

@Jason Bourne It's a disgrace. After reading Apocalypse Never, I am convinced that we have been fed the wrong information for many years, all for monetary game. This lecture was the reaffirmation that we have been taken for a very expensive ride.

[@litaknowes7294]

Disposable society mountains of Trash. And disposable friendships. Sad

[@galenofpergamon1144]

The censorship taking place on YT comments is intolerable.

[@PInk77W1]

It’s not KZbin It’s their tube

[@SS-ec2tu]

This comment will be censored because it criticizes the obscene censorship You Tube does.

[@trezz8]

This video has to have the mods chomping at the bit. Operation 'find a way to take this video down' is in full swing...

[@PInk77W1]

@@trezz8 end of the world

[@kenbellchambers4577]

I think they got hacked. there was a massive 50 cent army attack in the comments section. Then the censorship suddenly happened. Asymmetrical warfare. We all need to grasp the nettle now. The election fraud was a hostile act.

[@mattk6719]

This information should be sent to every corporate CEO in the West.

[@abidanhernandez9778]

Definately

[@duanekeith7816]

Every resource mobilized means every resource more available for embezzlement.

[@cindykaegi1855]

He is correct, and speaking out about the truth. Thank you . Well said .

[@Jc-ms5vv]

He is a paid liar :)

[@angelagonimavalero7700]

@@Jc-ms5vvYou must be the paid liar.

[@Jc-ms5vv]

@@angelagonimavalero7700 sorry you can’t handle near term human extinction

[@Ray-tk7ei]

We should use all our energy to clean the ocean's and find an alternative to plastics. Nature will deal with the rest as it always has, even when it may decide to make human life extinct. Well explained this man.

[@masada2828]

I remember a time when we did not use plastics and we managed to survive.

[@cdmarshall7448]

@@masada2828 Grape Nehi in a bottle was the bomb as a kid.

[@bksduskmirror1250]

@@masada2828 i also remember the paper bags, but the save the planet and save the trees activists had the solution, it was the plastic bags, they almost made paper bag illegal. That’s what you get when you let brainwashed idiots decide what’s best for the planet.

[@aharonbloch3720]

What an amazing lecture!! So happy that we still have rational thinking on this planet

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics.

[@aharonbloch3720]

I beg to differ. He’s a highly acclaimed professor! The key is rational thinking not fear mongering

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@aharonbloch3720 Freeman Dyson was also a brilliant man who criticized climate science yet he admitted that he didn't even know what caused the Ice Ages. A brilliant scholar in one field is not necessarily a brilliant scholar in another, and Happer clearly isn't. Google CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: WILLIAM HAPPER and see for yourself. So much of what Happer presents here is just plain wrong. He asserts that a doubling of C02 will hardly have any effect, when a consensus of climate scientists and the IPCC agree that it would cause at least a 3C rise in temperature, more than enough to cause disaster. That 3C is just in the short term. Over the long term, as ice sheets melt and reduce earth's albedo, temperatures would rise 6C or more.

[@cherylzocco8441]

Thank you for the REAL scientific facts! A GREAT man...we stand with you!!

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Google "Climate Misinformation by Source:" William Happer.

[@angelagonimavalero7700]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Yes, believe Google and no the real scientist, you have no argument, troll, go back and join the ignorant crowd.

[@rcraigd20]

This “scientist” is showing how he does understand the physics of climate change. While appearing to be scientific, he is clearly obfuscating reality. He is obviously biased as well, as indicated by his politics.

[@edpiv2233]

Great job. I would love to have more info

[@gimpy427]

Crop yields in the SEUS are double what they were in the 1950s. CO2 was around 250 then vs 400s today. Plants die below 150.

[@martinpattison8916]

They were around 300ppm then.

[@clippermuto6364]

What a delight to listen to someone that KNOWS what he is talking about, and isn't silenced!

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

C02 is only good for the planet and plants up to a point, beyond which it actually does the reverse and causes damage. William Happer is refuted by 97% of publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 scientific institutions who publicly endorse the consensus findings. He is not a climate scientist, has no formal climate science training, and has written no climate change papers. His specialty is optics. For years he took funding from the fossil fuel industry to promote the burning of MORE fossil fuels, not less. That alone should give anyone pause, especially when his "science" has been so severely rebutted by the vast majority of climate scientists.

[@clippermuto6364]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 whew

[@wselander]

Would be nice to have Mr. Happer's citations in the video description

[@AlJay0032]

Yes, fear is a strong force. It turns off rational thinking. How can we end this fear that has been implanted in people?

[@johnhanson5943]

Promoting independent and free science, strengthening education and reducing indoctrination, rescuing effective representative democracy and completely dismantling the Unholy OMG Alliance coordinated via Davos WEF. OMG = Oligarchs-Maoists/Marxists-Globalists.

[@AlJay0032]

@@johnhanson5943 So it's a generational project in effect. What that means is we have to privatize all schools and take them out of governments hands and perhaps hand out educational vouchers to parents so they send their kids to the school of their choice. Liberals will not allow that and fight tooth and claw s to prevent that and teachers unions will make a lot of noise.

[@dickgoblin]

Yes if i was paid 6 figures by oil companies I would be a strong rational thinker too.

[@jaybledsoe5285]

evidence for 6 figures paid by oil companies? which oil companies? when? how much? @@dickgoblin

[@frontiersupportlogistis5114]

2nd Peter 3 10- 13 tells exactly how the world is going to be uncreated by the word of God and your hairspray and your diesel engine is not going to have anything to do with it....

[@marilynbower1352]

So refreshing to hear logic and solid science. My first career was in meteorology and oceanography and Dr. Happer is totally on point. And as a gardening enthusiast and farmer's wife raising corn and soybeans, I greatly appreciate his explanation of the influence of CO2 on vegetation. I can hardly wait to share this with my granddaughter.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

Better do a little more research, Marilyn. Happer isn't a climate scientist and he's profoundly debunked in the scientific literature by those who are. Even his own American Physical Society (over 50,000 physicists) disagrees with him. Everybody knows that CO2 is great for plants, but what Happer leaves out is that the warming that accompanies rising CO2 cancels out its benefits by increasing heatwaves, extreme precipitation events, droughts and wildfires. Neither of these is good for plants. The optimum temperature for photosynthesis is the 60s. It completely stops at 104 degrees. Phoenix this summer experienced 31 straight days of temperatures above 110 degrees. How do you think their gardens performed?

[@marilynbower1352]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 You might want to do a little more research in the area of meteorology.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@marilynbower1352 I've been a science writer for nearly fifty years, published worldwide, in multiple languages, and I work with climate data every day. Here's what lay people don't know about William Happer and his views: 1. He's the former head of the CO2 Coalition, which has long been funded by the fossil fuel industry to promote the use of more gas and oil. 2. He isn't a climate scientist and has published zero scientific papers on climate change. That's because his expertise is OPTICS, not climate, and any published work would be excoriated by those who actually are climate scientists. You can see all of his talking points debunked at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE; WILLIAM HAPPER, at the Skeptical Science website. 3. ELEVEN separate studies confirm the scientific consensus on climate change. ELEVEN. Over 80 academies of science and ALL (yes, ALL) of the world's major scientific institutions, from NASA to NOAA to the World Meteorological Organization publicly endorse the consensus findings, which is why every nation on earth is a card-carrying member of the IPCC. 4. In 2021, Cornell University audited the over 80,000 climate studies published from 2012-2020 and tallied a 99.9% consensus that human activity, not nature, is driving global warming. Even Exxon's own scientists in leaked memos have acknowledged that combusted fossil fuels are warming the planet to a damaging degree. 5. Happer's claims that more CO2 is "good" and climate change is "natural and harmless" flies in the face of the world's PhD-level scinetists, their scientific data, and all of the world's scientific institutions, including the American Meteorological Society, the Japan Meteorological Agency, the UK Met Office, and, in fact, every meterological institution on the planet.

[@G4IvL30V3R]

Thank you as always Hillsdale, we appreciate all the information we receive! Such a great speaker.

[@kieranwalsh2289]

I love this guy; he is awesome

[@gillesandfio8440]

Energy is a life and death issue because it enables our ability to use machines to become more productive, and productivity ultimately determines our ability TO LIVE, INNOVATE, AND PROSPER. Life is about the production and gaining of values, not their loss nor their redistribution using fraud and/or threats of violence (unethical regulations).

[@BostrsBoy]

Mr. Happer, love you, man. I'm very concerned about your breathing. God bless you, sir!

[@dalib2833]

"Plants love CO2" William Happer -- Great bumper sticker

[@melaniecotterell8263]

watch any indoor cannabis growing instructional video and CO2 supplementation will be addressed. The benefit has been well known for 45 years at least

[@Graph1159]

Ironic that fossil fuels are the ultimate “green energy”

[@kareemsalessi]

KZbin::: (Arnold car-salesman) to see the actual stickers !!!

[@sevenmile]

Thank you Hillsdale!

[@herbertluthe6850]

as long as there are upright persons like Prof. Happer there is still hope that the brain washing alarmists will not succeed after all. long life the killer gas CO2, long life Happer!

[@ezraburgess895]

I once saw a amusing cartoon of a man carrying a sign on his shoulders proclaiming "THE WORLD WILL END ON ....!" The sign also had many past dates crossed off and a new one posted that also didn't come to pass. He carried that sign on the sidewalk of a large city every day. Today's alarmist media reminds me of that cartoon.

[@jimgollagher9412]

Very good , I have watched a lot of William Happer on KZbin and he just makes sense!!

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

William Happer is refuted by 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists, the IPCC, and the 170 major scientific institutions that publicly endorse the consensus findings. Happer is not a climate scientist, has not been formally trained in climate science and has written no scientific papers on climate change. His specialty is optics.

[@jimgollagher9412]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 watch and read more .

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@jimgollagher9412 I do read more, Jim, since I'm a science writer and work with climate data every day. Happer is the outlier here, not the thousands of climate scientists who contribute to the IPCC.

[@jimgollagher9412]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 thanks , being a science writer and using the ol' 97% of all scientist thing , please convince me of where he is wrong on each of the elements of his lecture. I am really interested to learn more .

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@jimgollagher9412 Take his graph at the 25:00 mark. He notes that a doubling of C02 would not double temperature. He's right. It wouldn't. But no climate scientist has ever said that it would. In fact, we know what a doubling would do. A doubling of C02 would raise global temperature by at least 3C, which is more than enough to create disaster. This is the number that IPCC scientists and the very latest data agree on. What Happer frequently neglects to include in his projections are the feedback effects that C02 triggers.C02-driven warming, in fact, accelerates evaporation, which fills the atmosphere with additional water vapor which, itself a greehouse gas, then works synergistically to warm the planet more than C02 could do on its own. Methane, another powerful greenhouse gas, is also released from pent-up permafrost. Like water vapor, it works with C02 to increase warming beyond what C02 could do on its own. These are short range temperature changes. Long range changes, by contrast, could go as high as 6C, according to a study led by James Hansen. As time goes on, more and more of the ice sheets melt, reducing sun-reflecting albedo, and exposing more land and ocean to absorb (instead of reflect) sunlight. This is, in fact, one of the most powerful synergistic warming agents to work with C02. Here are some other debunkings of Happer. Be sure to click on the links so you can explore each of his pieces of misinformation in more detail. skepticalscience.com/William_Happer_arg.htm

[@gigischultz2355]

a guy who tells the truth

[@johnschindler5209]

It is the best presentation I’ve seen on the actual impact of CO2 and the Earth’s heat exchange. It makes me very concerned about Bill Gates’ plan to disperse large amounts of carbon in upper atmosphere to block the Sun. The results of that may be unpredictable since the same carbon would also block Earth’s heat dissipation, besides negatively affecting all living organisms.

[@GrahameGould]

Please get him back. He clearly has a lot more to share and it is vital.

[@philipoakley5498]

Beautifully presented misrepresentation of selected 'big picture' truths. A real 'Crusader'!