Check out Foreo at foreo.se/7pkz and get 30% off UFO 3. For the first 50 people, get a 10% additional discount using the code 10SIDE. Thank you FOREO for the sponsorship!
@Cactusjugglertm7 ай бұрын
No chance in hell 😂
@KC-nd7nt7 ай бұрын
You copy 90% of old video and want to get paid for narration? Am I correct ?
@Sh4dowgale7 ай бұрын
Hell no!
@cocoloco19827 ай бұрын
HOW ABOUT WHEN A PODCASTER THINKS A 30% DISC. On a $500 product (GOD FORBID UR NOT 1 OF THE 'LUCKY 50' 2 GET THE EXTRA 10% 🙄) is a GENUINELY GD OFFER? Here's wht my AI co-pilot describes it as: 1. **"Elitist Podcaster"**: This term suggests that the podcaster caters to an exclusive, wealthy audience and disregards the financial struggles of everyday people. 2. **"Oblivious Commentator"**: Highlights the podcaster's lack of awareness about the financial realities of their audience. 3. **"Wealthy Bubble Speaker"**: Implies that the podcaster lives in a privileged bubble and doesn't comprehend the challenges faced by those outside their socioeconomic circle. I ❤ most EVERYTHING U DO. But this sponsor really offended me. I'm working 2 jobs & Still sometimes deciding btw eating/paying bills every month. Sorry, had to vent!
@cocoloco19827 ай бұрын
WOW. ONLY $397.50 with the DISC? JESUS H. CHRIST! Feel free to share some of Ur 💶's!
@maurapowers38807 ай бұрын
“Unfortunately they were both idiots” is a phrase that proceeds many blunders in history.
@SoulDelSol7 ай бұрын
I used to think people were generally intelligent, wanting to see best in people. However I've since learned from fb discussions and more recently from KZbin threads that most people are incredibly and horrifyingly dumb. It's really quite startling how many imbeciles are out there. I'm very disappointed by this
@grejen7117 ай бұрын
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's razor.
@blakemtg477 ай бұрын
Hold my beer
@gergsmail017 ай бұрын
Precedes 😅
@RattledPan7 ай бұрын
History in school was a guaranteed nap for the next hour, but if history was taught with a breath of fresh air: “Unfortunately they were both idiots” in an instructional reference or in a deadpan statement in a lecture hall would take the event and put it in front of the student alive in the moment. There is never a moment in time that someone isn't doing something stupid, saying "Oops." The laws of averages alone guarantees that every so often, it's a "Oops" that changes the world. I don't know about you but I actually find that sort of comforting...
@kayleighlehrman95667 ай бұрын
Franz Ferdinand's driver running into Gavrilo Princip after evading the previously unsuccessful assasination attempt
@Switcharoo127 ай бұрын
That's just freaking too many random parts suddenly somehow connecting. What are the odds‽
@jacob49207 ай бұрын
@@Switcharoo12 Yeah, this was not stupidity. It was pure bad luck, on so many levels. Though, to be sure, the Archduke even BEING THERE is the mistake that triggered the entire episode in the first place.
@DrRock19707 ай бұрын
Yeah that's gotta be up there
@JayM4097 ай бұрын
There was a large organized group of people determined to kill the Archduke during his visit. They were spread throughout the routes he was predicted to take. His assassination was almost guaranteed. It was well known how unpopular he was in Sarajevo, so his visit itself was the blunder.
@jacob49207 ай бұрын
@@JayM409 Yes, but the fact that they almost failed, in spite of all the planning, is noteworthy. In the end, a stroke of bad luck for the Archduke is what did him in. That's not a good plan at all, if you require LUCK to pull it off!
@ignitionfrn22237 ай бұрын
0:35 - Mid roll ads 2:10 - Chapter 1 - The chernobyl disaster 6:10 - Chapter 2 - The spanish armada 9:15 - Chapter 3 - Splitting the roman empire 11:30 - Chapter 4 - Everyone invading russia in winter
@katem.36777 ай бұрын
The Classic Blunders: 1) Getting involved in a land war in Asia 2) Going up against a Sicilian when death is on the line 3) Trying to invade Russia in the winter 4) Wearing white after Labor Day
@phaedrapage42177 ай бұрын
Exception to #4: if it's "winter white" and there's been enough snow, I believe that is acceptable in most societies. Although I still wouldn't take my chances around Beverly Sutphin.
@raquellofstedt97137 ай бұрын
I don´t know. The Finns in WWII did pretty well in white after Labor day... but thenagain, I don´t think they do Labor day in September.
@jonofthehill7 ай бұрын
Number 3 IS number 1. That's the whole point of the joke.
@terryhoffman91897 ай бұрын
Unless you’re……The Mongols!!!
@montegrifo7 ай бұрын
@@raquellofstedt9713You can't impress Finns with cold weather.
@MaesterTori6 ай бұрын
Had to pause the video when you mentioned Fukushima. I'll never, ever forget that day. I was living and working just south of Tokyo on 3/11/11, and ended up couch surfing bc my flat wasn't safe following the initial quake. My friend and I watched the live news broadcast, w news choppers flying around and above the plant as the explosions started. At that time, we all believed that the air and water currents would bring any fallout right down on Tokyo, and I remember saying to Clare "that's us done for, then." And she went into her kitchen and opened a bottle of champagne, and we cheers'd the end of the (our) world. It was around 1030 am and a beautiful golden spring day. I still can't talk much more about it than this, all these years later.
@AG3n3ricHuman5 ай бұрын
Dang. I was in Guatemala on a missions trip and we actually felt the quake that far away. We checked the news before the tsunami hit and learned of the quake and that the Fukushima plant had SCRAMed it's reactors but that everything was under control. I was worried about it because I'd read that the plant had a nuclear accident once before. Boy was I right to be worried!
@MaesterTori5 ай бұрын
@@AG3n3ricHuman it was a really hectic few days, and such a powerful quake.
@roscojenkins74517 ай бұрын
Every historian ever: "Invading russia in winter is a blunder?" Mongels: "hold my beer"
@kaltaron12847 ай бұрын
"Hold my Airag"
@stevelee57247 ай бұрын
Good one Rosco. I bet Mongols loved beer too ! 😅 Cheers from New Zealand
@kaltaron12847 ай бұрын
@@stevelee5724 Once they got to countries that had it. Cheers from Germany.
@kdynski7 ай бұрын
@@kaltaron1284 Humans have been fermenting grain in water for thousands of years so yes, I think they could get some.
@kaltaron12847 ай бұрын
@@kdynski They did in the inner Asian steppes? That's news to me.
@OzymandiasWasRight7 ай бұрын
Clips were shown during this video, but if anyone hasnt seen the HBO miniseries Chernobyl its absolutely still worth checking out. (I would also suggest checking out one of those 'what HBO got wrong about Chernobyl' as there are a few inaccuracies, overall its a really well done show)
@bobmarefka9987 ай бұрын
The Soviet RMBK reactor is one of the only, if not only, reactor designs that has a Positive Void coefficiency, where the lack of coolant (water) creates an increase in power. Pressurized Water Reactors, Advanced Cooled Reactors, and Boiling Water Reactors do not have this fatal flaw. They have Negative Void coefficiency designs.
@katcaparula78987 ай бұрын
This ad read is a true testament to Simon's acting abilities.
@roscojenkins74517 ай бұрын
Alas I shall never know since I skip ahead
@kryw107 ай бұрын
The only ufo Simon believes in.
@Hillbilly0017 ай бұрын
Considering Simon tries any sponsors products, he probably isn't acting. Allegedly.
@cedvelt7 ай бұрын
Proof he is a robot
@aRealAndHumanManThing7 ай бұрын
To be honest, I think he's like "well, feels good and moisturizes the skin, I guess". So good enough for him to justify accepting the sponsorship and probably gives a ton of money
@philiphumphrey15487 ай бұрын
The use of gunfire to disable ships instead of ramming was proven 17 years before the Armada at the Battle of Lepanto 1571 (which was probably a more historically important battle for Europe than the Armada). The Venetians pioneered the use of heavy cannons on their galeasses and use them to great effect against the Ottoman galleys, disabling them from a distance. The Spanish took part in that battle on the winning side.
@jochenstacker74487 ай бұрын
Apparently they didn't learn from that.
@BadKruser5 ай бұрын
Galleasses
@blaze0rama7 ай бұрын
The Spanish Armada also had a little problem with the weather.
@AvoidTheCadaver7 ай бұрын
One book I read alleges that the Spanish king expected God to deliver a miracle to assist the Armada because they were the true Christians
@trishapellis7 ай бұрын
I was taught that aside from the Brits' tactics and such, the Spanish just weren't prepared for the powerful currents and winds in the Channel and some of them were swept up against the cliffs.
@ongunacaroglu5 ай бұрын
Same weather didn't effect the Brits?😮 Curious....
@the-chillian7 ай бұрын
Simon didn't mention the technological innovation that made the English fleet faster and more maneuverable than the Spanish Armada. Up until that time, the prevalence of boarding actions meant that ships needed high "castles" at the bow and stern, to make the ship more defensible. (For a long time, the forward part of a ship was called the "forecastle" -- pronounced focs'l -- even if it didn't really exist as an elevated structure.) English ships, on the other hand, were "race-built" or had been "razeed" after construction, meaning the height of the fore and aft castles had been cut down considerably. This meant the ship's freeboard had much less exposure to the wind, and therefore affected the ships maneuverability much less, than the traditional design.
@psycofire937 ай бұрын
Editor friend can we turn the music down a few notches?
@MagieLamp7 ай бұрын
-5 Db pls*^
@dnkgil7 ай бұрын
We are loving these new videos
@ericmccarty96567 ай бұрын
Lithuania has a museum dedicated to the troops that froze to death on the retreat
@mattbillington46027 ай бұрын
Napoleon lost more troops to typhus in the summer offensive than the winter retreat.
@Inucroft7 ай бұрын
there are, alot of growing inconstiances in the script. Are they using ChatGTP?
@sargonyami42927 ай бұрын
@@Inucroftyeah also the statements about chernobyl
@JosephPercente7 ай бұрын
Also exposure, starvation, desertion etc.
@berges1047 ай бұрын
The control rods needed to manage the positive reactivity coefficient were gone. They lose coolant and thus their moderator. Water flashed to steam and they were royally fucked. Basically they set themselves up for a single point failure and then initiated the failure.
@RattledPan7 ай бұрын
Wonderful stuff, as always, Simon! You are always a fun ride! I love that in my mind, I buckle into my adventure car, and, um, "Excuse me, sir? Did I hear a loose bolt rattling under my car?" I get Silence, but a glare that said much. "Keep your hands and feet inside the car at all times." Now, as I shoot down into the blackness of whatever the hell you are going to show and comment on let me get back into my lovin' on these great films you and you team put together. I love that you can take the sometimes the oblivious like so much of the other things in our lives that we tune out, and make the blur out of our vision, and twist the image until crystal clear. That's the powerful stuff, eh? The first time I became aware of that fact was when I learned why it is still a law here in the US why all exits of businesses still have a sign that states, "These doors must remain unlocked during business hours." Why? In America, you can tell something horrible led up to signs that are ubiquitous. Pass hugs you your team and get Mrs. Simon to give you a big one. It's amazing what an effect your videos have on the world. I come from advertising. If your story (they use the same terms) is impactful, those viewers just became free advertising, and better yet, they are better salespeople.
@namelesscare79827 ай бұрын
One mistake changed the whole world forever, not just their lives. Sometimes a single blunder ends up with terrible disasters. People learn from errors and take a lesson from it.
@wormyboot7 ай бұрын
I appreciate the labeling of AI content. Please don't stop doing that.
@cheifDeisel7 ай бұрын
Simon has got to be the busiest man on KZbin.
@linda109897 ай бұрын
My hubby asked how many channels Simon has and I said about 7, lol
@trishapellis7 ай бұрын
@@linda10989 All 10 of them are actually mentioned in the description below every video. He does of course have writers and editors doing a bunch of the work for him - I have the impression that it's just his full-time job now to read these scripts to the camera.
@Jayjay-qe6um7 ай бұрын
"Human blunders usually do more to shape history than human wickedness." -- A.J.P. Taylor
@chillindave13577 ай бұрын
Thx for not mentioning my marriage 😂😂😂
@j.a.weishaupt17487 ай бұрын
I can steel feel the effects of it
@tinyelephant777 ай бұрын
Lol, same!
@alwaysflushinpublic7 ай бұрын
No problem Harry. Will u be returning to uk soon?
@No2Guy7 ай бұрын
Video starts at 2:10 , Skip the add 😊
@gumpyoldbugger69447 ай бұрын
Damn, someone else actually gets it. Nuclear energy is risking, but no where near as risky and damaging then fossile fuel powered energy.
@jyetremlett30717 ай бұрын
Why would you want either? Renewables are cheaper and safer
@angelaharris537 ай бұрын
@@jyetremlett3071 And wildly unreliable.
@EllieMaes-Grandad7 ай бұрын
@@jyetremlett3071 Not really cheaper, given high installation and maintenence costs , subsidies, and unavailable at night or in conditions of no wind. Apart from that . . .
@jyetremlett30717 ай бұрын
@@EllieMaes-Grandad yeah it is cheaper look it up
@namename99987 ай бұрын
@@EllieMaes-Grandad The environmental costs of cutting or burning down forests (wind turbines and solar farms are being installed in forests. What happens if theres a dry season), having to expand even farther rather than living densely, etc.
@jenniferlindsey20157 ай бұрын
Sadly, the people who were relocated as a result of the Fukushima meltdown, are having worse outcomes, mentally, and physically then those who were not evacuated. Some people stayed and are living with high levels of radiation, but are not living with the stress of losing everything they had, and having to start their lives over. It was a very interesting video. I suggest you research it. I think it was a Kyle Hill video.
@adamdavies62487 ай бұрын
About the same level of background radiation in the 20mile zone as Cornwall UK, interestingly, I didn't know the stat about the differing outcomes, thank you.
@lilmuon7 ай бұрын
There's a difference in those who can't afford to relocate when many things in life cost money, and those who choose to stay for reasons other than that. And if you leave while not being able to afford either situation, it would be best to not return to a dangerous area that risks yours and your family's life. Either way, both are starting lives over again. Not everyone struggles in the same ways...
@Chris-hx3om7 ай бұрын
You also have to realise that most of the relocation was due not to the 'radiation' but to the flooding from the tsunami.
@dalaanibombina88227 ай бұрын
How is relocating a worse outcome than living with high levels of radiation? Are you some kind of idiot?
@trishapellis7 ай бұрын
As far as I've understood it, the problem here is not the fact that they relocated in and of itself, but the psychological strain placed on these people by their compatriots who treat them like trash because they happened to be inside of a 10 mile radius of Fukushima when the disaster happened, for no real understandable reason. Including their own government.
@gunzakimbo7 ай бұрын
14:08 There is no way that number can be true for Napoleon unless you mean the actual "Fighting," not the whole invasion. The French started with around 600-700k and by the time they even started fighting the Russians BEFORE they retreated they were already down to 100-150k. The summer was way worse than the winter, that was just the final nail in the coffin of that horrendous journey.
@karenshadle3657 ай бұрын
Simon, I imagine you using the Foreo skin care thing. Then I look at you, and I think, where are you using this? Because beard, mustache, eyebrows &etc. .Now I just envision you running it over your scalp, which I must admit seems ever so shiny and smooth.
@MrSirlulzalot7 ай бұрын
The music 🎶 is exhausting. Thanks.
@victoriahigman68027 ай бұрын
Love your vids mr Whistler
@Makem127 ай бұрын
Napoleon? 1st French empire? I think Charlemagne would like to have a few words with you
@idmouse6 ай бұрын
Lol. Indeed.
@AnnaAnna-uc2ff7 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@ewok40k7 ай бұрын
Actually both Napoleon and Hitler invaded in June, but the size of Russia meant the fight extended until winter - and into later years in case of WW2.
@Cloud300007 ай бұрын
Actually he covered that at the end of the video.
@kaltaron12847 ай бұрын
At least Hitler planed to start quite a few weeks earlier. Not sure about Napoleon.
@sirridesalot66523 ай бұрын
@@kaltaron1284 Also, Hitler wanted the armies to concentrate on getting the Caucasus oilfields but his generals wanted and concentrated on getting to Moscow instead.
@kaltaron12843 ай бұрын
@@sirridesalot6652 Hitler changed his mind on where to attack a few time AFAIK and the assault on Moscow was alsmost successful. It was thwarted by weather, poor logistics and Japan. Then they focused more on the south again but were finally halted at Stalingrad. Whether the fall of Moscow would have ended the war is questionable but you just have to take look at a map of the railways of the time to see that it would have been a big blow.
@PeterShipley17 ай бұрын
with Chernobyl you completely MISSED a fact about that it was Xenon poisoning, something that prevents reactors from restarting for at least a day and a half.
@markevans22947 ай бұрын
There were several factors involved. Including the "positive void coefficient" of the graphite moderated, water cooled RBMK reactor. With the formation of steam pockets inside the core increasing both fission and xenon 135 "burning".
@kmullins12597 ай бұрын
And also the overall mistake of the major design flaw with the graphite tips speeding up the reaction when first inserted. While dyatlov messed up, the whole thing was set up for failure to cut costs
@jarrenhelme60607 ай бұрын
The biggest missed fact was that the test failed he said it was a success
@mattbice99917 ай бұрын
The Spanish Armada is actually even more fascinating in that most of the ships lost were due to poor weather and crashed on Irelands shores with crews largely killed by local armys. It was a multitude of factors that resulted in the English victory from Phillip as a monarch and strategist, the generals following plan over opportunity, poor weather, and the cannons on the Spanish ships being land cannons attached to a boat whereas the english fleet largely had naval cannons. The armada was rewritten as an English victory slowly in the late years of Elizabeth I reign through the 20th century whereas it was largely a stalemate. England attempted some armadas against spain that were equally if not more catastrophic on the basis of sheer military strategy.
@eddythefool7 ай бұрын
Honestly, i also blame the Simpsons for the antagonization of nuclear power, specially the episodes with the three eyed fish.
@SirHeinzbond7 ай бұрын
the death toll of chernobyl was not only the people at the place when the explosion happened but also the afterward cleaning action, where the SSSR wasted a lot of human personal to clear roofs of debris... okay at that time robotik wasn't a theme but i guess there could have been less deaths if the clearing work would not be this hasted...
@Larry6607 ай бұрын
11:30: Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat its errors. Those who do learn from the past will find new ways in which to err.
@Willowflat167 ай бұрын
Also worthy of consideration: Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing Nazi Germany. The Galipoli Campaign. Mao's Four Pests campaign, which led to the starvation of 20-30 million people over 4 years.
@j.a.weishaupt17487 ай бұрын
He covered the China one in the previous video. Not sure if I can call appeasement a blunder. Yes it didn’t bring world peace as Chamberlain had hoped, but Hitler was gonna Hitler regardless of UK’s policy.
@PaulXPZ6 ай бұрын
@@j.a.weishaupt1748 but appeasement meant Hitler was allowed to Hitler sooner and longer than he would have otherwise
@Metikoi7 ай бұрын
Attacking russia in winter is less of a factor than the continual inability of European conquerors to understand just how expendable the rulers of Russia regard the population as and their concomitant willingness to let said starve if the other guy starves too.
@beagleissleeping53597 ай бұрын
How about any man made disaster that happened because the people in charge decided, "We'll do it this way instead because it's much less expensive." Well, maybe not, considering these disasters are still happening because of cost cuts.
@jasonjuneau29487 ай бұрын
Yeah but when there's an oil leak people can still live in that area. When a nuclear reactor melts down well...we all know how that goes.
@CharleyU6 ай бұрын
Wind, solar, hydra and geothermal are all better and safer than either fossil fuel or nuclear... and honestly meltdowns aren't actually the biggest issue with nuclear, it's the waste, very few long term viable methods of dealing with it are actually being implemented
@FortisKnight7 ай бұрын
Not to mention the terrible storm the Spanish had the misfortune to encounter as they sailed around the West of England so as to attack from the entrance to the English Channel. A rather costly miscalculation, wouldn’t you think?
@quantumrobingaming66677 ай бұрын
chernobyl disaster was a mistake but the mistakes went back far before the plant was even built. Poor design, Soviet cost & corner cutting, lying to operators about how it worked, etc. Shocking levels of incompetence and cover ups before the plant even went on the grid.
@stephenphillips460919 күн бұрын
Gorbachev once blamed the end of the USSR on this disaster, so there's that as well.
@mentat13417 ай бұрын
How often you think Simon is rubbing his head with that Foreo doohickey? His head is so smoooooooooth
@grejen7117 ай бұрын
No mention of Thomas Midgley Jr.? Huh. If your talking about unreasoned fear of Nuclear power meltdowns the blame has to lie with a '70s movie with Jane Fonda and her dad. Right after the 3 mile island incident. In Japan the fear stems from the Godzilla movies maybe.
@Loralanthalas6 ай бұрын
That and rich men own oil. Not nuclear.
@stephenphillips460919 күн бұрын
Thomas Midgely , so good he developed two earth-destroying pollutants.
@kasahadragon94997 ай бұрын
Isn't the waste product from nuclear power the biggest issue with a nuclear reactor ? Yes I sound half informed but am still curious 🤔
@Kktienlegos7 ай бұрын
Check out the nuclear video series by Kyle Hill. One of them discusses how spent fuel can be stored. He also does a great job explaining the science in depth but in an understandable way for us ‘normies’.
@kasahadragon94997 ай бұрын
@@Kktienlegos thankyou 💜
@CharleyU6 ай бұрын
very few long term viable methods of dealing with it are actually being implemented though
@mitchellforney61097 ай бұрын
LOL just watched this after watching Simon's "Decoding the Unknown" episode that included a bit about the hacking of the Galileo probe launch. I wonder what order he filmed these.
@Elowen_Fae7 ай бұрын
I just realised that you sound like Steve (the older brother) from Arthur Christmas and now I can't unhear it
@dublkrossr20597 ай бұрын
I dig this narrator because his British accent is good enough for American English to understand. All of his shows are excellent by the way...
@matthewshannon69467 ай бұрын
England and America - two countries divided by a common language...😅
@peterbroderson60807 ай бұрын
Cheap if you do not take into effect a plant with a 50 year life has to guarded for the next many hundreds of years for radiation. Nuclear plants need to be refueled as well plus again the waste! Not to cheap to meter
@CharleyU6 ай бұрын
Wind, solar, hydra and geothermal are all better and safer than either fossil fuel or nuclear... and honestly meltdowns aren't actually the biggest issue with nuclear, it's the waste, very few long term viable methods of dealing with it are actually being implemented
@jmanj39177 ай бұрын
0:03 Nah, screw that mess. Go big or go home! 😆
@KangElla16665 ай бұрын
Fukushima gets forgotten because it is illegal to report on it in Japan. When looking for scientific papers about radiation caused by it there are very few papers..and the one I found said that the radiation levels in mushrooms in residential areas nearby was extremely high. The 0 direct deaths thing is most certainly not true
@duB420Grass7 ай бұрын
"International Nuclear Detonations in Japan" - That's an incredibly misleading way to describe those events. lol I'm not gonna say it's kinda disrespectful; I'll let someone else draw that conclusion.
@GreatSageSunWukong7 ай бұрын
I swear simon's beard gets longer with every video, he's slowly turning into ZZ Top
@sargonyami42927 ай бұрын
The test was not completed successfully the thing blew up as soon as they started the testphase. And they fucked up in more ways than one they landed in a xenon pit because they run it on low power for so long and than they made more dumb moves. Hell the entire things is pretty much a hoe to blow up a reactor task list. In fact it was void before it even started because the power was to low
@neotheresa2 ай бұрын
“Unfortunately, they were both idiots” Me about my last two braincells
@Larry6607 ай бұрын
8:50: I believe the phrase is, "God fights on the side with the heaviest artillery."
@heidinolen8737 ай бұрын
Well I, for one, don't wanna live next to a facility that depends on humans to function properly or I lose everything around for 10,000 years. That's a lot of confidence in a species I'd prefer not to grocery shop with. What I'm saying is, concept good, application bad.
@michaelmccleary3377 ай бұрын
To be fair to Charles XII the Swedish winter is pretty insane too. I’d think that the weather wouldn’t be a factor
@AG3n3ricHuman5 ай бұрын
There was another destroyed armada (actually two of them) that changed the world. In the late 13th century the Mongols tried to invade Japan twice, but a pair of typhoons sank the fleets and saved Japan. The storms came to be called kamikaze (translation: "divine wind"), a term the Japanese later used for their infamous suicide pilots in WW2.
@Tacko147 ай бұрын
9:18 hang on. The Roman empire stretched all the way up to northern Waddenzee in the Netherlands? Just in a flash, but I saw it alright. That deserves a vid. I thought they stopped at Utrecht and Leiden.
@satakrionkryptomortis7 ай бұрын
dude...aachen has been founded by rome. you think they stopped there??
@EllieMaes-Grandad7 ай бұрын
Borders were never precise lines, with patrols in areas beyond them. Tax-raising on the other hand . . .
@robertphillips62967 ай бұрын
The Peter Principle.
@raquellofstedt97137 ай бұрын
When invading Russia, take note: do NOT forget the winter kit.
@cafiend7 ай бұрын
It started before Chernobyl. And there’s still the storage problem for nuclear waste and debris from decommissioned plants. Better than fossil fuels but still not great.
@natehill80695 ай бұрын
2:22 It was a test of reactor safety. I knew that. But I have never heard: did it pass the test?
@bobingabout7 ай бұрын
There's only 1 empire that has ever conquered Russia in winter. The Mongols.
@gary-williams7 ай бұрын
Was expecting to see the fall of the Berlin Wall mentioned (Schabowski made a mistake in announcing a policy change).
@linda109897 ай бұрын
It was an amazing time watching as one country after another left the Soviet Union. And all because of Chernobyl.
@danielkarlsson93267 ай бұрын
Id say Peter the greats loss of Narwa to Charles 12 was a bigger Blunder then Charles going after Peter.
@Tomberculosis-q1i7 ай бұрын
I just finished watching the first video literally seconds ago and i see this lol
@stevelee57247 ай бұрын
Simon. Have you been to New Zealand ?
@johnwarren8925 ай бұрын
He needs to sign up with a beard care company. I need some. Lol
@manuelacosta94637 ай бұрын
In addition to disease, combat attrition or drowning the other cause for the Spanish Armada's high casualties was the English policy of no quarter to the survivors washed up on shore. A vast majority of those who made it to land were rounded up and executed sometimes en masse.
@drewstead3167 ай бұрын
Spanish Armada's failures led to the English funding a contest to finding latitude with accuracy in the 1720s which led to the chronometer in the 1760s/1770s, before that it was mostly guess work
@briantownsend9414Ай бұрын
4:50 I think you mean "intentional"?
@victoriaeads61267 ай бұрын
From the Napoleonic defeat by Russia we get French Bistro! The Russian troops weren't supposed to be getting food while they were out and about (they were probably on duty), so whenever they would order food at local cafes, they would ask for it 'bystro bystro' or 'quickly, quickly.' The term stuck.
@SplendidMisanthropy7 ай бұрын
Enquiry to Radio Erewan: Could the catastrophe of Chernobyl have been avoided? Answer: In principle, yes. If only the Swedes had shut up.
@stuman017 ай бұрын
Survive until winter and have the atlantic convoys re supplying you.
@terrencemoore87397 ай бұрын
Is it just me or is the music playing while he's talking around the 3 minute mark super distracting?
@Elon_Marz7 ай бұрын
Something on SMRs would be interesting
@CyrilleParis7 ай бұрын
"LED therapy". LOL !
@philiphumphrey15487 ай бұрын
On operation Barbarossa the German army had already been weakened by significant losses in the Polish and French campaigns (that were not the walkovers that many people believe). They also seriously underestimated Russian resilience and ability to keep fighting despite early losses and setbacks. A mistake mssrs Biden and Johnson seem to have repeated not so long ago.
@barbiquearea7 ай бұрын
Not to mention the looses they took in Greece, Crete and North Africa, which was still ongoing.
@stephenphillips460919 күн бұрын
You forgot to mention the bit where Putin made a similar mistake, by invading a 'weak' neighbour and finding it anything but weak. That's key to the bit you referenced at the end of your comment.
@jonofthehill7 ай бұрын
Glad you tell us where the 'AI Depictions' are, and there aren't that many, but I still don't like em. Plenty of good historical images out there and AI generation is gross. Great stuff aside from that.
@mintekal27387 ай бұрын
One of the biggest blunders also has to be the one that saw Berlins walls torn down
@vanpenguin227 ай бұрын
Oh, my! They're going to put a tiny thermoisotopic generation cell into interstellar space that will no doubt collide with a neighboring star and be incenerated or remain adrift among the galaxies long after decay completion!
@vbifusful5 ай бұрын
There are oversimplified description of what's happened in Chernobyl. It was a coincidence of multiple accidental cases, operators' mistakes and design flaws. All was well-documented. There is no question, how it was happened, but who is to blame? So many people did his usual work and made usual mistakes, that separately was innocent, but in this case it was lead to disaster.
@gingercat7777 ай бұрын
So nuclear is cheap once it's built? Then how come the UK has some of the highest energy cost?
@EllieMaes-Grandad7 ай бұрын
VAT and paying subsidies to 'green' operators must contribute, plus profiteering.
@gingercat7777 ай бұрын
@@EllieMaes-Grandad Yet you didn't mention subsidies to the fossil fuel industries and you import Australian gas and every country has a GST/VAT.
@flecx97677 ай бұрын
One Person has officially died through the Radiation of Fukushima (one of the workers). Overall the Meltdows killed about 1000 people,not because of the meltdown or Radiation, but because of the evacuation. With many old people not surviving the stress and many others through psychological damage and resulting suicide. Much less would have died if many of the regions would have never been evacuated. Since a lot of the different evacuation regions only were contaminated to the equivalent of taking a few CTs in a year.
@namename99987 ай бұрын
And testing is unreliable because how do you know 0 people didnt have a disease in previous years if no one tested for it. And testing doesnt mean fatal. A lot of people could live normal lives and have thyroid problems and not know about it for 50 yrs.
@Elbereth_TV7 ай бұрын
the main issue with Poltava was that the cavalry got lost by a few kilometers, sweden had beat russia several times before being outnumbered in greater numbers
@arisaga8227 ай бұрын
It’s not as if Chernobyl handed the oil companies a golden opportunity to crank up the fear pronz of nuclear power to 11, right? They would absolutely never covertly fund activism against it, right?
@hzaagman80057 ай бұрын
15:00 It wasn't because soldiers were expendable (the German high command was actually very concerned about the army's losses up to that point), but because delivering ammunition and fuel to the front was more important than winter clothing considering the widescale Soviet counter attacks during the winter of 1941-42. There's no point in having your soldiers dressed warmly if they have nothing to fight with. Also bear in mind that getting *any* supplies to the front was difficult because of the poor state of the Soviet road system (even *before* the onset of winter weather) and it makes sense that the Germans prioritized ammunition and fuel over winter clothing.
@EllieMaes-Grandad7 ай бұрын
Then again, all that ammo and nobody to use it. It comes down to balance . . . . pppppp
@dawnwilson15297 ай бұрын
Don't mess with Elizabeth!
@Guys_Home_Run7 ай бұрын
Creating Israel has to be up there as a world changing event. Done for the right reasons but ended up being a problem for generations to come with no end in sight
@Goldfire-tt3dv7 ай бұрын
Dyatlov was most likely a scapegoat just like Bryukhanov. Testimony by surviving Chernobyl staff paints him as a "strict but competent" boss whose orders were not questioned simply because nobody, including Dyatlov, knew any better. Dyatlov himself later stated that he had no way of knowing that even the very numbers for the reactor's operation, the numbers he was basing his decisions on... were a lie. Also, another major way in which Chernobyl changed the world was the collapse of the Soviet Union, which Gorbachev attributes to a large degree on the enormous economic toll caused by the cleanup operation.
@robotnoir52997 ай бұрын
[5:14] Nuclear power is a much better option. * * If you ignore that there are no solutions or even proposed solutions for indefinitely safely storing nuclear waste, and that 75% of US nuclear sites ALREADY leak radioactive material. The way we treat nuclear-waste is like shutting a grizzly-bear in a Japanese paper-house and pretending the danger is gone.
@phaedrus0007 ай бұрын
What most people including you don't seem to realize is that there are different kinds of nuclear waste. The really dangerous kind, the kind that sticks around for thousands of years, that stuff is actually pretty rare. Only a small amount of it is produced by nuclear plants. The majority of nuclear waste is actually not that radioactive. Like the "radioactive material" you mentioned that many plants leak is actually just water with tritium (an isotope of hydrogen) that is barely radioactive. You could take a drink of that water and be perfectly fine. You would receive less radiation from that then you would from eating a banana. But go off, keep scare mongering while the ice caps melt.
@mikedavey19967 ай бұрын
There is a solution. The problem is people who freak out over any project to store it properly which means it is instead being left in ad hock storage facilities. The vast majority of nuclear waste is low level which is not that dangerous. The rest would fit in an olympic sized swimming pool, sans casings. The most dangerous radioactive material has low half life - meaning it becomes significantly less dangerous in a relatively short period of time. The storage of nuclear waste is a solved problem - the real problem is political. The money put aside by the US nuclear industry for proper storage generates 1.5 Billion dollars a year in interest alone. Obama cancelled funding for the federal side of the equation and the project to store nuclear waste properly has been sitting in limbo ever since.
@robotnoir52997 ай бұрын
@@mikedavey1996 Are you joking or lying? There is NO SOLUTION, and no proposed solution. I suspect you know this, which is why you didn't specify the solution you claim exists. High Level Nuclear Waste needs to be securely stored for about ONE MILLION YEARS before it is safe. It would be really shoddy to only store it for only say 10,000 or 100,000 years. Yet we store it in pathetic concrete bunkers that would be lucky to last 150 years. It's like wearing your seatbelt as you back out your drive-way, then taking it off to drive from NewYork to California coz "you already did the safety bit". Why even bother? It is 100% guaranteed that MOST of this high-level waste WILL escape containment before the radioactivity has dropped to safe levels. It WILL get into the ground-water, and WILL be a constant nightmare for thousands generations of humans. Just because the bunkers solve the problem for YOUR life-time doesn't mean it's over. The first Homosapians appeared about 750,000 years ago. Just think, that's a shorter amount of time than your ancestors will be haunted by the nuclear waste created in YOUR lifetime. How can you be so cold and un-caring of future humans? Those who were alive today, during the nuclear age, will be the most hated generations EVER. Make no mistake. We're not talking about Carbon here, where the planet has a built-in self-defense mechanism of washing the carbon from the sky to the sea with rain, where it settles on the tectonic plate, and is eventually pushed under the magma. This nuclear waste does real permanent damage, in a way that is totally un-natural, so the planet can't deal with it, even on geological time-scales. BTW, 95% of the total radioactivity produced in the nuclear power process is in High-Level Nuclear Waste, so I don't know why you're trying to gas-light me with assurances that low-level waste isn't that dangerous. Ofcourse it isn't! It only contains 5% of the radioactivity! Low-level waste is just pairs of rubber gloves that someone used for 5 minutes while moving a rod. It's not ACTUAL nuclear-waste. It's stuff that was NEAR nuclear waste for a few minutes. The soil surrounding your HLW bunker is prolly more radioactive than most LLW.
@robotnoir52997 ай бұрын
@@mikedavey1996 Don't keep it a secret. Specify this solution you're so sure exists. Keep in mind that HLW needs to be safely stored for AT LEAST 100,000 years, but more like 1million years to be sure... and tell me what facility we have for storing something undisturbed for that long? By the way, low-level-waste is stuff like rubber-gloves that were used for 3 minutes to open a valve. Naturally, these things have fairly low radiation compared to a spent-nuclear-rod, so I'm not too worried about that. 95% of radioactivity is in HLW. If you can offer me a solution for the HLW, I''ll happily waive the last 5% of radiation that comes from LLW.
@Ayrshore7 ай бұрын
@@robotnoir5299 covered in many other videos.
@Ulrich.Bierwisch7 ай бұрын
It's always interesting to see that don't invade Russia in winter getting discussed without even mentioning WWI.
@thumpyloudfoot8647 ай бұрын
Statistically speaking someone watching this video will make one of these historical mistakes....
@JosephPercente7 ай бұрын
Was this sponsered by nuclear reactor construction companies?
@YukiteruAmano927 ай бұрын
11:48 I think the phrasing 'enslaved' is a touch misleading. He defeated and replaced the Polish king with a puppet ruler. Makes it sound like Augustus II was shipped back to Sweden in manacles and made to do unpaid labour for the rest of his life.