Historical Evidences of Sri Krishna and the MahaBharata: with Chandru Ramesh

[@AswiniThanapati-s8u]

Jai shrikrishna jai sanatandarma

[@Dipak449]

Hare Krishna 🙏🕉️🇮🇳🌈🪐

[@suvansinha4222]

Very very informative.. such dedication of both of you..true warrior of Sri Krishna..

[@premsinghrawat7836]

Hare Krishna 🙏🙏🌹🌹

[@radhakundjoshi6266]

FOR SURE KRSNA IS REAL AND OUR BEST FRIEND...THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS GREAT EVIDENCE OF KRSNAS APPEARANCE ON THIS PLANET

[@omshanti5885]

Lord krishna living eternal infinite true God v r indivisible part of our divine lord krishna

[@Prathameshsali]

Hare Krishna ♥️

[@vj4313]

Hare Krishna hare rama 🌹🍁🌷🌸🌺🌼🕉️🕉️🕉️🌿🌿🌿👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🙏🙏🙏…From..Vj Taxi 🚕 Leicester 👆🕺

[@ashishpatel350]

hare krishna

[@mystery1967]

Jai SitaRam Jai RadhaKrishna 🥰

[@avdeshkumar5491]

Radhe radhe sister

[@ShashiKher]

Excellent topic. Very interesting and lots of information. Thank you you both. God bless. Hare Krishna Hare Krishna. Jai sri radhe radhe.

[@vishvnaik2756]

when people ask me 'DO you believe in God?', 'Do you think God exists?' I say, ' I don't have to think or believe God exists because I KNOW --- I KNOW KRISHN EXISTS; I JUST KNOW 🌀 KRISHN'S MAGIC >>>> Man's Logic which is God (KRISHN) given anyways JAI SIYARAM JAI SHREE KRISHN 💙💕🖤🌀🚩🌍🌎🌏🌐

[@vishvnaik2756]

very informative video thank you

[@pinkuswain1715]

jay Jagannath

[@MS-fw9he]

💐 राधे शाम 💐

[@vinodmadhwal7510]

जय श्री हरि

[@indrajitgadhavi924]

Hare krsna Kishori di

[@prashantitv]

हरे कृष्ण

[@ajittripathi7353]

🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@iuvvuiieii]

Studies show the Vedic culture arrived in 100AD with the arrival of vedic Aryans and the imosition of Endogsmy to prevent mixing with the ANI population.( Mix of Strppe and AASI ancestry since 1500 bc) With the advrnt of endogsmy the ANI population regressed into their own respective occupation and communities now known as Castes.

[@stan8ify]

According to wiki Mora and other sources, the well inscription is 1st century CE. Wonder if he gives sources of the 2200 year old dating in his book

[@rg9652]

All his evidence are around 2000 years old, but Mahabharata happened around 5000 years old. How 2000 years old thing can be taken as evedince for 5000 years old. All these people are trying to make us fool.

[@iuvvuiieii]

War chariots and related legends shoukd be confined to the iron sge 1200bc to 500bc.when chariots were made.

[@kushalregmiikushalregmii6534]

हरे कृष्ण 👏👏👏

[@cpol1146]

In this video you guys talked about medieval history of India and invasions. History of India from the times of arabs to british in short and summarised way. (in below comments rest will include) : PART 1 - Prologue PART 2 - Arabs Vs Indians PART 3 - Why Indians failed to counter the Turks PART 4 - Ray of hope called Chatrapati Shivaji and rise of The Maratha Empire PART 5 - Decline of Maratha Empire infront of British PART 6 - Period 1818-1857 & 1857 war against british PART 7 - British rule between 1857 -1947 PART 8 - India after 1947 PART 9 - Epilogue PART 10 - Some books recommendations to read PART 1 - Prologue *Ancient name of collections of Indian traditions/cultures/belief systems is called - Sanatana Dharma. *Ancient/Original name of India is : Bharat and it includes modern day India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and some parts of Afghanistan(i.e. from Kabul and Kandahar upto Bamyan province of Afghanistan). And it was a one whole land/country/nation. And influence of Bharat beyond this geography was known as Bharatvarsh. Let me tell you in short and summarised way as hardly people know since we are not taught correct history thnx to distortions by the british in order to make us feel inferior and later on that narrative was pushed by leftist in India after independence. 1. Turkic are those who came from & belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why many people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis, Tajiks or Turkmenistanis , better to say Turks. The actual name of modern day turkey is Anatolia. It was a part of Byzantine Empire. The turks are actually people of Central Asia that is modern day Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikisatan, Kyrgyztan. kazakhstan. The Ottoman Empire was founded by Osman I and he comes from a tribe called - Oghuz Tribe which is actually a tribe of turkmenistan (a Turk tribe). Ottoman Turks belonged to the Kayı Oghuz Turkic clan, who fled their native homeland in Central Asia, during the early 13th century, due to the Mongol invasions. The clan settled in Anatolia and later on as the Byzantine Empire got weaken, these turkic tribes defeated Byzantine and islamised their people and enslaved the people of modern day turkey and established Ottoman Empire. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis, Tajiks or Turkmenistanis , better to say Turks. By the way this Oghuz Tribe also enslaved the arabs too and forcefully took the title of caliphate from arabs. The Ottoman tyranny against the Arabs was an extended reality. Let me tell you few incidents among many. At Hama, in the Levant, Ottoman Empire sent a campaign in 1685 to discipline Arabs and punish them because they ejected the Ottoman governor due to his increasing prejudice. In 1698, a campaign was sent to burn the Lebanese town of Ghazir and, a year later, the Ottoman governor of Damascus sent an army to Nablus to kill its people and capture 700 women. This injustice and tyranny forced the poor Arabs of the Levant to emigrate. Another example of the brutality of the Ottoman governors was the impalement of men and the putting of women into sacks with some lime and dumping them in rivers. Moreover, they used to burn villages. It is noteworthy that the horrific methods of torture, such as impalement, were not known to the Arabs before the arrival of the Ottomans. The person who impaled and killed the Arab slowly was rewarded. Also, they used to enjoy mutilating the dead bodies of the Arabs and cutting off parts of their bodies, especially the ears, and the leaders boasted of collecting the largest numbers of them. They also fought the Arabic language with a policy of Turkification, through publications and jobs, imposing the Turkish language on all government transactions. People dont realise that Ottoman Empire is actually an invading empire on Modern Day Turkey(Anatolia). It is just that people of Turkey converted to islam, so they claim Ottoman Empire as their own but technically it is a turkic dynasty of central asia. It is like if the Indians adopted Protestant Christianity then they claim British Empire as their own, which is obviously nonsense. By the way, the Indian troops under the command of Dalpat Singh Shekhawat fought and defeated the Ottoman Empire in Battle of Haifa (1918) and after this battle onwards the downfall of Ottoman Empire started. This defeat sealed the fate of the Ottoman Empire and led to its demise. 2. When I say Hindus it comprises modern day Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhist and Jains. They all belong to one Dharmic Traditions. British made division in order to divide the Dharmic society & later on further divided Hindus into castes. They made division and classification among hindus bcos they were constantly facing the revolts from hindus even after 1857, and it was getting difficult to control India & they thought if this continues then they might lose the control over India. So in order to keep the hindus in check, they made those division and classification. I would suggest you to check out Puneet Sahani's talks on KZbin.He has exposed these things with facts, esp regarding how sikhs were separated from Sanatan Dharm (Hinduism) by the british. And by the way, caste is actually derived from Portuguese word 'Casta' . So it is actually a European concept not even an Indian concept & in order to break our spirit & make us feel inferior & embarrased of ourselves with loser mindset, they distorted & manipulated our history. And all these things are documented in 1871 British India Census Documents, Mcaulay writings, etc. Infact during the british era, there were more than 500 princely states, among them over 400 princely states belong to Shudra (SC caste or so called low caste) Kings. I suggest u to watch a documentary of Channel - Prachyam , video titled - Sahebs Who Never Left (Documentary) . 3. Regarding Indian History,which unfortunately we r not taught correctly bcos of distortion by British which was designed in such a way that to make us feel inferior. As George Orwell said - “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own history'. There is a proverb that says, “Until the lion tells the story, the hunter will always be the hero.” No wonder instead of reading History of Indians, We read history of outsiders. And till now we read history which was designed by british. And it is a big shame for all of us. Like for eg - one fact that over 1380 years have been deleted from the Indian history in order to adjust it into biblical timeline which is limited in nature i.e 2000-4000 years. Prof Vedveer Arya has written books on this & has given challenge to western historians on this.Vedveer Arya has given his talks on KZbin. OR Aryan Invasion Theory, which was designed to create animosity between North India Vs South India. Infact it has been proven wrong by many people. And this theory now has been debunked many people now. So, there are plenty of things like this.

[@cpol1146]

Let me give you two examples among many of distortions done by british. For eg - Regarding ancient India, people only think that maurya empire was only upto afghanistan and some parts of central asia and Iran but that is factually wrong. Regarding Indian History, which unfortunately we r not taught correctly bcos of lost of so many information as libraries were burned by the Turkic invaders from Central Asia and with remaining information distortion was done by British which was designed in such a way that to make us feel inferior and later on it was continued and distorted more thanks to leftist. So the true extent of Maurya Empire is - Maurya Empire extended as far Egypt to Turkey to Greece in the west and in the north it extends to Central Asia to Western parts of China particularly Khotan region to other areas of China to as far Japan in the east. This was the true extent of Maurya Empire. Major Rock Edict XIII inscription clearly mentions about victory of Maurya Empire to as far Egypt to Turkey to Greece. And Khotanese texts clearly talks about Maurya dominance over Central Asia and western part of China. And Ashok Stambh of Maurya Empires are still there in some parts of Japan, as these Maurya Stambhs were symbol of Maurya Empire dominance/influence. By the way Major Rock Edict XIII is the same inscription from which we get information regarding Kalinga War of Ashok but in the very same inscription ahead there is mention of victory of Maurya Empire to as far as Egypt to turkey to Greece. But these leftist historians ignore that. By the way the Chandragupta Maurya we all know is actually Samudragupta of Gupta Empire. This confusion happened bcos over 1380 years were deleted from Indian history in order to fit into biblical timeline of 2000-4000 years with other distortion. This is why ancient india is very confusing and not in a proper chronological order. If you read greek texts, they mention Indian King Sandrocottus, who defeated Greek Commander Selecus Nicator and established his dominance over eastern part of greek empire and the descritpion of Sandrocottus is exactly of Samudragupta. And both Indian texts and greek texts confirms it to be Samudragupta. By the way an extra info about the area of Gupta Empire was, Source : Prayag Prashshti Inscription - In the east it covered whole modern day Iran to Central Asia in the north to Sri Lanka in the south and South east asia nations in the South east and to Burma in the east. Prayag prashashti inscription gives clear information about Samudragupta and his military campaigns and how he fought more than 100 battles and lost none. One last eg - There is an Indian King called Samrat Vikramaditya, his name have been erased from Indian History as 1380 years have been wiped out by british in order to fit indian history to biblical timeline of 2000-4000 years. It is said that he has created the largest Indian Empire after Yudhisthar. I suggest you to type on google images - Samrat Vikramaditya Empire . And he said to rule over Arab Peninsula to Eastern Europe to China to Mongolia to Kazakhstan to Myanmar and Thailand. In many puranas there is mentioned about him, but a lot of information has also been erased bcos of turkic invaders destroying libraries across India. But there is one important source. There is an Arabic Poet called Bintoi who lived 165 years before Muhammad, he writes in his poems and mentions about a Great Indian King called Samrat Vikramaditya rule in Arabia and he thnx him that how Vikramaditya civilised his arabic ancestors and brought prosperity in Arabia.

[@cpol1146]

PART 2 - Arabs Vs Indians When Arabs were at their peak and till that time whole Persia Iraq,Syria ,Egypt have fallen in front of Arab Caliphate and expanding their faith , they were defeated by the Indians. Abu Bakr was made caliph after Muhmmad died. 634: Two years later, Umar I became caliph after Abu Bakr's death. Umar I reigned till 644. 636/637: During Umar I's reign, the first ever battle between Arabs Vs Indians took place, It was a naval battle b/w Indians Vs Arabs but the arabs were defeated by Chalukya Pulakeshin II. The Indians under the command of Pulakeshin 2 thrashed the Arab army which was under the Caliph Umar. The attack was repelled with Indians victory over Arabs. 637-643: Another attack on Bharuch was made by Arabs on al-Hakam's orders. Bharuch was then ruled by probably Dadda 2 Gurjara( Lāṭa)/Vijayarāja Chalukya, depending on exact year of attack. This attack was also a Gurjara/Chalukya victory for Indians. 643 : al-Hakam ordered invasion of Sindh,Chachnama declares it Indians victory. Sindh was then ruled by Chach of Alor (Aror). Arabs didn't gain anything by this naval attack on the port of Debal (Karachi), the Indians won. The news of Arab defeat in Sindh was a serious anomaly for the Caliph's ears, which were habituated to hearing of victories in whichever direction the Arab armies went. Such was the demoralisation, that even the next Caliph Uthman, didn't dare attack India till his death. 663: In the reign of Caliph Ali, al-Harith raided the area of Kikanan (Kalat-Sibi area in Pakistan).The Arab commander was killed & Arabs were repelled. During ~660-680, 6+ Arab attacks took place on Kikanan. But, the Indians resisted and Arabs didn't gain any territory despite frequent attacks. Thereafter till 705 CE, the Caliphate experienced multiple civil wars. Kabul & Zabul Indian rulers defeated Arabs twice during this period. 708-711 CE : In the reign of Caliph al-Walid I, al-Hajjaj (Governor of Iraq) sent two Arab armies to attack Raja Dahir of Sindh. Raja Dahir first defeated the Arabs near Debal & killed Ubaidullah.Al-Hajjaj sent another commander, Budail, from from Oman to attack Sindh.Budail fought with Jaisimha, Dahir's son & was killed by Jaisimha. Arabs were again defeated at the frontiers of India & many are not aware before Raja Dahir got defeated, there were many battle between many battle between Arabs Vs Indians & those wars were won by Indians. The battle Arab won was of Mohammad Bin Qasim bcos Raja Dahir of Sindh have given refuge to some Arabs when there was Civil war between Arab & they betrayed him. But later on when the news reached to the ears of Bappa Rawal & he not only thrashed Arabs from Sindh but also thrashed & chased the Arabs upto Iran & made check posts all the way from Iran to India. Probably this is the reason why Iranian r not fully Arabised & they still celebrate Pre Islamic festivals like Nauroz etc. Later on Arabs were defeated by Indians under The Great Indian Emperor Samrat Lalitaditya Muktapida, whose dominance extended right from Bay of Bengal to Caspian Sea. The defeat of Arabs by The Great Lalitaditya was very humiliating for Arabs. After defeating Arabs, Lalitaditya ordered left over Arab soldiers to shave off half their heads as a symbol of their submission to Lalitaditya. Then Arabs were again thrashed by Indians under Mihir Bhoj & Rawal Khuman 2. How Arabs Described Mihir Bhoj - Arab chronicle of Suleiman states that - Mihir Bhoj king of Jurz. Among the princes of India,there is no greater foe of there is no greater foe of Muhammadan faith than he. And Rawal Khuman II fought the arabs and defeated the Abbasid Caliph army led by Al-Ma’mun . It was kind of a final encounter between Arabs Vs Indians. Khuman II fought the arabs & defeated Abbasid Caliph army led by Al-Ma’mun. It was kind of a final encounter between Arabs Vs Indians. Rawal Khuman II defeats arabs & captures their general Mahmud. Khuman’s victory over Mahmud was conclusive & since it was the army of the Caliphate ,it completely demoralised the Arabs. Mahmud was held captive by Khuman.He was let go after extracting heavy penalties from Arabs. So Indians didn't face any problem while dealing with Arabs. The problem Indians faced was actually against Turkic people & Turkic are people belonging to central Asia that is modern day Kyrgyztan ,Uzbekistan, Tajikistan & Turkmenistan. The mughals actually came from Uzbekistan. So they were all Uzbekis. *NOTE -Turks are those who belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Kazakhstana, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis,Tajiks or Turkmenistanis better to say Turks. So against the Arabs , Indians did not face problems but it was actually against the Turks, we faced problems that too bcos of our own foolishness. PART 3 - Why Indians failed to counter the Turks

[@cpol1146]

PART 3 - Why Indians failed to counter the Turks *NOTE -Turks are those who belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis,Tajiks or Turkmenistanis better to say Turks. *By the way, all these Ghori were Tajiks (Turks), Gznavi, Khilji , Tughlaq etc were all belonged to Khallaj Tribe which is actually a Turk Tribe. They islamised the whole Afghanistan after the fall of last Hindu Dynasty of Kabul - The Hindu Shahi Dynasty. The first serious Turk settlement happened in 1206 with start of Slave Dynasty in Delhi. And all other later dynasties after them were called Delhi Sultanates. And their actual rule was just limited to Delhi and nearby areas and later on they were overtaken by Mughals who came from Uzbekistan. And mughals were Turks too. First SERIOUS Turk attack happen in 1025 & King Suheldev defeat these Turk led by Salar Maqsud in 1025. But later on why we failed to counter them in later years esp from 1200s onwards.Bcos of following reason a) Over dependence on Horses - 50% (b) Not understanding the islamic ideology - 30% -> A common reason for others too (c) Not being united - 10% (d) Miscellaneous Reasons - 10% 1. Bcos our Kings were over confident & not united. 2. This is the most important reason which comprises of 50% reason as i mentioned. It all started with mistakes by Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Afghanistan when they lose their grip over Central Asia particularly over Southern part of Central Asia & they didn't bother to establish their influence over their again.And why Central Asia was so important bcos all the Indian Kings used to get their majority horses from there. As Central Asian Horses were considered the best. In mediaeval time horses were the engine of any army.And unfortunately the Indian Kings from 500 A.D. onwards have started shifting their military tactics slowly, from being Infantry to cavalry that is horse based.And with each new century years passed,this dependency process speeds up. Its not that horses are not there in India. There are Indian breed horses. But Central Asian Horses were far more superior as compare to Indian horses. So Indian Kings used to have horses even the Indian breed horses,but they never depended on them on the primary level when it comes to military. Horses were always seen as an additional strength for the military. And infantry was the strength of Indian Kings from the Ancient Vedic times ,this is the reason why infantry marital art was developed in India. The natural military strength of the Indians was always - Infantry, Elephants & Naval Power. Even though there are several reason why they did that by shifting military tactic from infantry to cavalry. Though there are no specific reasons why they did that by shifting military tactic from infantry to cavalry as lot of information have been lost bcos of burning of so many books, libraries, universities and schools by the invaders. This happened bcos when Indian Emperor Skandgupta defeated Huns* & we Indians have established our supremacy over Eastern Hun Empire,esp Central Asian Region.And from their onwards Indians started shifting their military tactic from infantry to cavalry. It's not that people didn't caution them not to have over dependence on Horses & infact also stick to your natural strength that is infantry.And one can use cavalry as additional military method but dont let go off your natural strength that is infantry. But no one really bothered. And once the grip was lose over Central Asia. It created problem. And there was sudden collapse in the military structure & everything fall like a pack of cards. And the dynasties which didn't shifted their 100% strength to Cavalry & stick to their natural strength,those dynasties survived & defeated these invaders like Vijayanagar Dynasty, Gajapati dynasty, Ahom dynasty etc. Infact Ahom Dynasty of North East India defeated mughals more than 17 times. Both Vijayanagar & Gajapati Dynasty were got destroyed bcos of some other reason which I will explain later. *Huns = Huns were considered a dangerous force in the world at one point of time. The Huns were nomadic warriors who terrorized much of Europe and the Roman Empire in the 4th and 5th centuries A.D. The terror which the Huns caused over the Europe and the Roman Empire is something un-imaginable. Its was the Huns, who were responsible for the annihilation of Roman Empire. And with invasion of their Capital Rome in 452 AD, the Roman Empire was wiped out. But the force, which used to terrorize whole europe was defeated by Indian Emperor Skandgupta. The Hunas, under the leadership of Toramana, suffered a crushing defeat by the Indian Emperor Skandagupta in 458 AD 3. They all failed to understand religious ideology of invaders.Bcos even after loosing grip over Central Asia. We still won many battles like - Taimur Lang was defeated by Jograj Singh Gurjar in 1398. And the defeat was so devastating for Taimur that he literally fled India OR Ruler of Gajapati Empire (Eastern Ganga Dynasty) defeated these invaders in 1248 & many more etc. So Indians still won many battles but they were so naive that they didn't understand that enemies they are facing. They all failed to understand the religious ideology of invaders. Bcos even after loosing grip over Central Asia. The Kings still won many battles but they were so naive that they didn't understand that enemies they are facing are not your typical enemies. They are all driven by ideology of Islamic Zealotry.

[@cpol1146]

4. Over Confidence, being naive & foolishness. Even though there are so many examples but I will give you few examples among many examples : Queen Naiki Devi defeated Ghori in 1178 but instead of chopping his head she let him go free OR Another eg : After defeating & capturing Mohmad Ghori in 1191, Prithviraj Chauhan releases Mohammad Ghori in 1191. And this proved to be a heavy mistake for Prithviraj Chauhan OR King Vidyadhara Chandela defeated Mahmud Ghazni but let him go free but due to code of honour King Vidyadhara let the retreating invader Gazni go OR Alaudin Khalji was defeated in battle in 1488 by Badal-Gora OR another eg - Rana Hammir Singh defeats Muhammad bin Tughluq in 1326 and captured Mohammad bin Tughlaq & jailed him for 6 months and then let him free. Another eg - Rana Sanga defeated invaders like Ibrahim Lodhi, Sultan of Delhi in Battle of Khatoli (1517) and Battle of Dholpur (1518) . And Rana Sanga also defeats & capturs Islamic Sultan Mahmud Khilji II in 1519.Later on he defeats another islamist Sultan Malik Hussain in 1520. Malik Hussain surrender in front of Rana Sanga & he later took all his wealth. Later in the same year, Rana Kumbha defeats the coalition army of two islamic sultanate . And with this Rana Sanga became the supreme power in the Northern India. After Babur (Founder of Mughal Dynasty) capturing Delhi, Babur decided to attack Rana Sanga as soon as possible. In a two months long battle between the Turko Mongol army of Babur & Rana Sanga took place in Bayana (near Agra). The Mughals got defeated & & were forced to retreat to Agra. This time Rana Sanga didn’t follow the policy of wiping out the invading enemies as he did against the other islamic Sultans. He was sure that from this defeat Babur will not attack him and this gave Babur enough time to recover & to recover & prepare for the final climax at Khanwa, which was the first and the last defeat of Rana Sanga. The undefeated Rana Sanga had finally made a miscalculated move and this proved to be a heavy mistake on his part. Another eg : Maharana Pratap when he defeated 3rd Mughal King Akbar in Battle of Dewair (1582) ,he had the golden opportunity to grab the Delhi Throne and when everything was going in his favour, he just let that idea go away. Maharana Pratap not understanding that they are not your typical enemies, infact the aim is Jihad & expand their ideology. And there are many examples like this. And there are many examples like these. Not understanding islamic ideology has been a big problem of Indian Kings. Stupidity like many of mughal expansion was done by some Indian Kings bcos many Indians kings had ego tussle & internal conflict between them. So it was obvious, outsiders will take advantage of this. Like - it was Raja Man Singh who expanded Mughal Empire by defeating & subduing old kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha and also conquered Kabul for 3rd Mughal King Akbar. Infact, in mughal empire, the land right from from Kabul to Bengal was actually conquered by Indian King Raja Man Singh when he allied with 3rd Mughal King Akbar as there was ego tussle between Raja Man Singh and Maharana Pratap. That's a different story altogether. There was also a big issue with Indian Kings that once they have given their word to someone, they always maintain that at any cost. And these invaders always took advantage of this. And this has been a big problem of Indian Kings esp from 13th century onwards, when they have given their word to someone they fully respected it & maintained it as it was a matter of pride for them and it was seen as a manly thing, a sign of masculinity. But whenever the enemy got a chance to violate it & defeat the Indian Kings, they always did. 5. Another example : When Humayun (Father of 3rd Mughal King Akbar) was leaving they get refuge in Amarkot in Sindh by King Rana Prasad. He gave refuge to Humayun and his family who were struggling at that time. Not understanding the islamic ideology. Later on these were the same Mughals who butchered the people in order to spread islam. * You gave invaders one chance, they will come and annihiliate you. Like people of Anatolia gave one chance to Turks and Turks captured Anatolia, destroyed them and islamised them completely. And unfortunately our ancestors gave invaders multiple chances to revive and attack us

[@cpol1146]

6. Indians were fighting among themselves too. Like the downfall of Gajapati Empire was bcos of continous attacks by Vijayanagar Dynasty from the south.Gajapati Empire (Formerly knownn as Eastern Ganga Dynasty). It defeated the invaders multiple times & later on decided to march towards Delhi & finish this mess once & for all. But it got attacks from its southern part from The Vijayanagar Dynasty. This diverted Gajapati Empire's attention & they got busy in fighting the Vijaynagar Dynasty. And this gave Foreign Invading Army of Delhi Sultanate to revive itself and attack when they saw the opportunity. With the decline of Eastern Ganga Dynasty (later on came to be known as Gajapati Empire) , The Vijaynagar Dynasty captured the Southern part of Gajapati Empire (Eastern Ganga Dynasty 7. Employing these Central Asian people in their Army as commanders and generals. Best eg - Vijayanagar Empire. The capital of Vijayanagar Empire was considered the finest capital in the whole world. And they were very powerful Kingdom. But in Battle of Talikota which was a fight between Vijayanagar Empire Vs Bahamani Sultanate and outsiders like Gilani brothers, who were appointed as commanders of Vijayanagar Army & betrayed King Rama Raya in the name of jihad against kafir & supporting the invader islamic army and boom , the Empire Collapsed. 8. And most shocking the Indians were fighting the Indians. Like during the initial period of Mughal time, the many warriors in army of mughals were actually Indians. And there is a problem with a Polytheists culture like Hinduism , Greeks, Pagan culture etc that they all easily accept the belief system of others bcos in their own Polytheists culture there are many gods and belief system so accepting a new system is not an issue for them. And this is here problem arise with monotheistic religion like Islam and Christianity that says our God is the only true God & your God is fake. And this is here Polytheists failed to understand their ideology. 9. Finally, among all invaders, mughals establish themselves as the supreme power in India. Mughals came from modern day Uzbekistan. Mughals had turkic - Mongolian genes and they came from Central Asian region, specifically from modern day Uzbekistan. From 1526 onwards, From 1526 onwards, Mughal Empire gets founded by Babur when Babur captures Delhi but later on his son Humayun (2nd Mughal King) was forced into exile when he lost battles in 1539 & 1540. He then gets shelter & refuge by Sindh King Rana Prasad. With arrival of Akbar (son of Humayun & 3rd Mughal King) , at that time Vikramaditya Hemu was sitting at Delhi Throne and he controlled an area right from Bengal to Delhi and some areas beyond it. Abul Fazl (court historian of Akbar) noted that prior to battle of panipat,Hemu had fought & won all 22 battle & never lost any battle. Akbar fights Hemu & defeats Hemu in 2nd Battle of Panipat (1556) & finally establish mughals as supreme power esp. in the northern India. And with the help of Raja Man Singh of Jaipur, mughal empire established themselves as the strongest empire of North India. It was Raja Man Singh who expanded Mughal Empire from Kabul in the North West to Bengal in the east by defeating & subduing old kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha and also conquered Kabul for 3rd Mughal King Akbar. Infact, in mughal empire, the land right from from Kabul to Bengal was actually conquered by Indian King Raja Man Singh when he allied with 3rd Mughal King Akbar as there was ego tussle and internal conflict between Raja Man Singh and Maharana Pratap. That's a different story altogether. And the exact geographical area of Mughal Empire was - Kabul in the North West to Bengal in the east and to Satpura range in the frontiers of deccan that is southern boundaries of state Madhya Pradesh and Northern Bounderies of state Maharashtra. And below mughal empire, there was Ahmednagar Sultanate, Bijapur Sultanate and Golcondas. And below them there was scattered areas which were left, after the fall of supremacy of Vijayanagar Empire. Part 4 : Ray of Hope called Chatrapati Shivaji & Rise of The Maratha Empire

[@iuvvuiieii]

Anupriya 'caste no bar' in Nature 19 april 23

[@SajiSNairNair-tu9dk]

🤔why i come her?

[@samspade2657]

Why are you using his karmi name?

[@tanishasharma8246]

Hii radha love you

[@bruh-bg5mm]

The historian is lacking patience.

[@omshanti5885]

LORD KRISHNA LIVING ETERNAL INFINITE TRUTH N SUPREME GOD V R INDIVISIBLE PART OF LORD KRISHNA OUR SAVIOUR LORD N MOTHER FATHER

[@fatherofallgameover3319]

Mam ki dekhia koi bhi ankh, naak, muu se Paida nahi hota h ye bas kahania h or Jai Shri ram main bhi bas Hindu hu par inn baato ko nahi maanta hu

[@suvansinha4222]

I think you are in the wrong channel..