Historical Judgement of Supreme Court on How to get Acquittal in Cheque bounce case in Hindi I

►अपनी क़ानूनी समस्या को 1 कॉल पर अभी सॉल्व करे (Legal Opinion)
Whats App- wa.me/message/CNF4QLGUA6CNE1
Consult with Legal Shots Experts ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
Consult with Legal Expert Adv. Naman Mohnot ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/advoc...
______________________
►हमारे बनाये गए Legal Courses से जागरूक बने, Click here
link.labourlawadvisor.in/lega...
_________________________
►Description
Judgment link- RAJARAM S/O SRIRAMULU NAIDU (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. vs. MARUTHACHALAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS, JANUARY 18, 2023 main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/...
00:00- Introduction
01:09- Facts of the case
03:36 - Judgment By Supreme Court
04:28- The Law in the case
Recently, a two-Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising Justice B.R. Gavassi and Justice M.M. Sundresh passed a Judgment dated 18.01.2023 in Rajaram s/o Sriramulu Naidu (since deceased) through l.rs vs. Mr. Maruthachalam (since deceased) through l.rs., and reiterated that the adjudication in civil matters is based on the preponderance of probabilities, whereas, adjudication in criminal cases is based on the principle that the accused is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Based on the arguments and analysis presented by both the Appellant and Respondent, the Supreme Court allowed the present appeal and gave observations:-
(1) That the Apex Court relied on its earlier judgment, Baslingappa vs. Mudibasappa (2019) 5 SCC 418,
(2) That “The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities.
(3) That it is reiterated that the adjudication in civil matters is based on the preponderance of probabilities, whereas, adjudication in criminal cases is based on the principle that the accused is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
(4) In terms of the standard of proof in Civil Cases, the High Court rightly came to the conclusion, on the basis of the evidence, relying on the preponderance of probabilities
(5) However, in terms of standard of proof in the Criminal Cases, the Respondent could not prove the Cheque Dishonour Cases against the Appellant beyond a reasonable doubt.
_________________________
► Related Videos
Landmark Judgement of Supreme Court on Cheque Bounce case in Hindi I Section 138 NI I 2022 tinyurl.com/33zb9934
Landmark judgment of Supreme Court on Limitation in Cheque Bounce I Section 138 of NI Act in Hindi tinyurl.com/3dh5x7rv
Cheque Bounce case NI Act Sec 138 | Explained in Hindi tinyurl.com/5c3ef6v4
2 मिनट में जीते Cheque Bounce Case I You must know this NI Act tinyurl.com/y4bj6bzu
7 Precautions before taking Cheque. Cheque Bounce case in Hindi tinyurl.com/2p99wsdm
_________________________
►Contact us
What's App ► [phone]
Reach out ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
_________________________
►Follow Us
Website ► thelegalshots.com/
Facebook ► / thelegalshots
Instagram ► / legal_shots
Linkedin ► / legalshots
_________________________
#legalshots #chequebounce #supremecourt #landmarkjudgment

[@harish4700]

लोगों का भरोसा खत्म हो रहा है और फिर ऐसे फैसले किसी सही की भी मदद नहीं करेगा कोर्ट में ईमानदार परेशान और बेईमान खुश हो रहा है सोचनीय 🤔

[@satpalkataria1035]

Ye ruke bahut galat h

[@satpalkataria1035]

Ye rule bahut galat h

[@SurendraSingh-cc6vn]

Cort me phle maat jao, esso ki maa chod do or dukan ko pot do, jo cort ke dhakke pahle khane the vo aab khalo,kaam to ho gaya apna,

[@vestigemarketing2561]

भाई साहब 10 हजार देकर लोग 3 लाख का cheq भर रहे है

[@ManojKumar-sq8fz]

50000 dekar 500000 ka cheque bhar rha uska kyaa ...imandar ki bat kar rha...

[@harishdhruw0607]

सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बहुत ही शानदार फैसला 👌👌 ईमानदार व्यक्ति इंकम टैक्स में जरूर शामिल करेगा... और जो ब्याज में पैसा देकर गरीबों को बेवक़ूफ़ बनाते हैं उनके लिए बहुत बड़ी सबक है🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@santoshkumarkushwahasant-sc9nb]

कोर्ट ने यह क्यो नहीं पूछा कि यह चैक फिर क्यों दिया और किस बात पर दिया कोर्ट ने गलत फैसला किया है

[@DhirajKumar-uk6hg]

Judge chutiya hai🤔

[@user-bj5fz5sq3i]

Bilkul bhai saheb mera bhi yahi swal hai ke cheqe to diya gya hai .aur cheqe par likha hota hai ke main dhark ko bhugtan karne ka wada karta hoon.phir paise diya ya nahi diya wo baat nahi baat hai cheqe bounce ka case chalna chahiye. Mujhe lagta hai kisi ko odhar do hi matt agr oski niyat khraab ho gyi to court aap ke favour main nahi hoga paisa bhi gya case par bhi kharch kiya.

[@siddharthgangawane9942]

सामने वाले ने कॅश देने से पहले चेक से ही पैसे डे दिए होते😂😂😂

[@normallife5753]

कोर्ट में ईमानदार ज़लील होता हैं बेईमान मौज उड़ाता हैं

[@MyDigitalMemory]

tumhara dard mai samjh sakta hoon dost

[@therainmaker6174]

Great judgement! Following this one can earn very very good amount by taking loans from good, innocent people against a post dated cheque to woo their confidence and later deny the payment. Very good Indian Legal syste. This judgement must be well circulated in public domains for people with courage to take advantage of the opportunity to build wealth.

[@samarthgaikwad7610]

बड़ा खेद हे भाई चोर चोरी करने के लिए कानून की सहायता ले रहा हे , 😢 अब इंसाफ कानून नहीं , खुदको करना पड़ेगा 😢

[@ShivaniSingh-uc2sw]

😂😂😢😢😅😅..अरे भाई साहब..सिविल कोर्ट से सुप्रीम कोर्ट तक पहुंचने का वकील लॉयर का खर्चा भी बता देते..पता चला 3 लाख का केस था..सुप्रीम कोर्ट तक पहुंचने पर बंदे के 30लाख खर्च हो गए..न्याय पाने के लिए ..या अभी भी न्याय नहीं मिला 😂😂😂😂

[@prakashshete808]

ये तो बहुत ही अच्छा निर्णय है! क्यो की जो भी आदमी किसिको पैसे दे तो इसकी इंट्री इनकाम टैक्स मे करणा नहीं भुलेगा ! और इस के कारण टॅक्स इमानदारी से लोग भरेंगे क्यो की वो जो ३००००० लाख था वो कायदेसे चोरी का पैसा था ( ब्लॅक मनी ) तो कोर्ट ने सही फैसला दिया है !

[@hariommarketing7688]

Dhanyabad aapka aur manniya Supreme Court ka Supreme power hai apko tahe dil se Mera samaan aur respect hai today umide jagi hai police bhi harassment Kiya hai

[@bindaasbeauty7083]

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने ये क्यों नहीं पूछा कि चेक किस वजह से दिया था

[@sharmasandeep7]

Usne keh diya hoga ki meri cheque book raaste me kahi gir gyi thi aur wo complainent ko mil gyi hogi...just kidding.

[@ramsihoselal]

​@@sharmasandeep7 bhaisab uski FIR hoti hai agr aapka chak gum ho Jaye to

[@chantingishalfthebattle]

Hamare desh mein Sach ko saboot ki zyada jaroorat hai.Culprit ko bachane wale toh bahut hai.😢

[@SanjaySharma-dy7zk]

​@@sharmasandeep7रिपोर्ट दर्ज कराई क्या

[@user-ns2oj4nx6n]

Ha bhai Sahab suprim cort ne 30000 ko nahi mana to ye to maanna chahiye ki 300000 nahi diye maan liya lekin saamne wala check bhi eshe to nahi de sakta na ye bhi sochne wali baat hai check koi chori karke thoddi le gaya tha kishi ne kishi ko apne haath se dusare ke haath me diya hi hoga na

[@prashanttayade6260]

चोर को छुडाने का नायाब तरीका....बेईमानोका साथ....इमानदार को सजा...वा रे वा इंन्साफ

[@pramendrarathore488]

Bhai jyadatar chaque baunce fargi hote hai

[@sahilsingla5272]

Jine finance vale hunde aa sare chor hunde aa

[@iftikharkhan8711]

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने ध्यान नही दिया चेक किस बात का । ये तो पैसा खाने गलत नियत को बढावा

[@jaishetty4469]

cheque is a promissory note...ho sakta hai loan dene ki neeyat rahee hogi, jo ho na saka kisi wajah se.

[@sureshsinghal7623]

​@@jaishetty4469 🎉🎉😢🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@geer1320]

jiska paisa khaya uske liye bahut galat faisla hai supreme court ka

[@bhawani1970]

1cr lo aur default Karo ..

[@jiyoaurjeenedo5954]

इस समस्या का एक ही हल है कि आप किसी को भी पेमेंट दो तो चेक से दो उसकी एंट्री हमेशा आपके पास बुक में रहेगी वह आप कभी भी साबित कर सकते हैं कि हमने उसको पेमेंट दिया है

[@hemantsonawane13]

ऐसे फैसले होने लगे तो दुनिया में इसके बाद कोई किसिके उपर भरोसा नहि करेगा और इमानदार लोग भी किसिसे मदत मिलनेसे वंचित रह जायेंगे.

[@nizamuddinkhan4901]

Very very important legal interpretations of cheque bounce case.

[@7speedysingh]

Really appreciable...thanks to elaborate it in simple language.

[@ujjwaldeepsharma2165]

Sir very good content for taking advantage inspite of being wrong.

[@amandeeparora101]

Very very good judgement and thanks for informing that information

[@gurujitraders1253]

बेईमानी का रास्ता बड़ी खुशी के साथ बताया जा रहा है

[@balkishanahirwar5498]

Dhanyabad sir aap jaise log jab takis dharti pe hain.majal hai kisiki ke ek bhi dosi ko saja ho sake.

[@MrPpcops]

With due apology to the Honourable Supreme Court of India, I can say that it was miscarriage of justice. A peasant without paying the money to the accused, went up to the High Court and the accused issued the cheque without any liability are not understood. The peasant suffered a huge loss.

[@rajkumarchadha3142]

Yes, what is the answer to the point as to why the cheque was issued if no amount was du for payment? Why silence on this aspect?

[@sandipsurywanshi1881]

Main point is resion of giving money why he given money and such large amount there will be main 2 resion 1 ) he is trying to help or 2) he is willing to get interest. 1) in first if he trying to help means he knows that person infront of him had no money and he will return it after some time once he get from another source. In this case person is helping he knows the risk and not liable to get back he is money. Resion he just donate money. 2) in second condition if he willing to get back money with extra interest then he willing to earn money from person which is not capable to pay again And it is illegal. So in conclusions both cath person who given money without checking background of person who taken money. So in both case borrower no responsibility to payback money. So it very important to understand why he given money.

[@jasdeengar6207]

Under Duress

[@balbirshastri1434]

😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮

[@chandrashekharahire4798]

Thank you very much for sharing Sir

[@vijaykumarjain3262]

Legal provisions are so complicated that advocates twist them in their client's favour and the genuine person most of the time is loset.

[@NitinSharma-oz6ck]

Agar koi party bill ke against payment na de aur apni dukan band karke bhag jaye. Demand notice bhi na received kare kyoki gst me jo address h isko wo band karke bhag gaya h.

[@rinkupatil7189]

Dhanyawad guruji ❤

[@user-vr2ri9cn1z]

चोरी और बेईमानी करने के नये नये तरीके विश्वसनीयता पर सवाल खड़ा करते हैं।

[@rkrock2160]

Kuch लिया होगा जभी तो चेक दिया होगा। Cheque ki bhi मिट्टी पलीत करदी कोर्ट ने।

[@sadhanasultanajehirblogs4600]

Thank you sir.

[@opverma1938]

बहुत सही निर्णय।क्योंकि आजकल ब्लैक मेल करने के छोटी मोटी राशि देकर ब्लैंक चेक लेकर बड़ी रकम भरकर धमकाया जाता है। कि अगर इतना नही दिया तो इतना लूंगा।और जो राशि दी गई उससे 5से 25 गुणी तक राशि भरकर चेक लगा देते हैं।उन लोगों को सबक है ये निर्णय।

[@kikishaikh2312]

Good information ajkal logh jutha case banakey case kertey hai bounce cheque kanoon itna strick saja honchaiyen jhutey case ka koi dusra kanoon ka time khoty aur begunaah ko saza howey

[@balkaransingh7919]

Amazing. How the ITR came into picture. It doesn't have any column to show money given on loan.

[@advamitdogra1227]

Very good video Sir, Thanks a lot Sir.

[@abhimanu1981]

Sir pls tell me one thing k agar kisi ne apna cheque kisi ko diya aur uske bad apna account band kr diya to bank chequebook, credit card ,debit card, aur passbook return k bina account close nahi krta aur koi cheque missing h cheque book m to apko full detail of missing cheque deni padegi agar nahi di to account close nahi hota aur account close krna h to FIR of missing cheque deni padegi with check no and other details aur wo banda bs ye FIR ki copy bank ko deta k cheque missing h aur stop payment krwa deta to cheque bounce he na hota aur na case hota us 138

[@baltejsran5351]

Bhut bdiya video hai sir . Aksar kissano k sath ese he dhokhay se kush log cheak bounce k case par pese lete hai

[@bharatsangam2200]

Falling standard of the judges of the Supreme Court .....

[@AdvSantoshCZalteSillodDistAura]

❤ Thanks for your Best information about Dishonored of cheque judgment with lots of Blessings to you and your family With warm regards ✨️

[@banwarilalinspector5556]

क्या ऐसा भी फैसला हो सकता है आश्चर्य होता है

[@roshankumbhare6136]

Sirji jaise ki bank 138 case ka paymnt court se kr diya court case close hone k baad bank intrest k liye fir se case kr sakte hai kya

[@prashantdhagavkar4368]

There are number of judgements of the Supreme Court that if the amount has not been shown in the IT Return then it is the duty of the IT Authority to take action against him but Section 138 is absolutely applicable.

[@narayanrao8339]

138secton applicable ORnot ?

[@narayanrao8339]

Any Englsh version ?

[@dssengar4795]

आपने बिल्कुल सही तर्क दिया है,ये दोनों मसले जुदा है ओर सबसे बड़ी बात तो यह है कि परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम में ऐसा कोई प्रावधान ही नही है और न ही संशोधन हुआ है,यह अधिनियम केवल शुद्ध रूप से चेक नाम के अधिकृत दस्तावेज के अनादर से जुड़ा है और एक समंस विचारण है जिसमें निराकरण के लिए 6 माह की समय सीमा तक दी गई है और जिसमे धारा 138 को सिद्ध होने के लिए केवल तीन सीमाए है जिनका पालन अनिवार्य है और उसमें भी यदि चेक प्राप्तकर्ता ने किसी अन्य विधान का उल्लंघन भी किया है तो उसके लिए उस विधान के तहत अलग से दंड या जुर्माना के प्रावधान है,किसी ने अपने लेनदेन को अधिकृत विभाग में घोषित नही किया तो आयकर अधिनियम के तहत अलग से कार्यवाही की जा सकती है,परन्तु केवल लेनदेन को घोषित न करने से चेक अनादरण के अपराध से आरोपी को मुक्त करना तो हास्यास्पद ही कह सकते है। "क्या मजाक है"

[@zevrapansari8274]

It is optional to show these transactions in most common ITRs

[@sanjeevkhurania]

In income tax return we show earnings not investments, if person didnt get any interest then how he will mention it ITR....PLEASE CLEAR

[@gedelasasibhushanarao3863]

Well summarised the essence of SC judgement

[@HaryanaKrishiJagat]

मेरे हिसाब से ये पैसा ब्याज पर दिया गया होगा जो विश्वास पर दिया जाता है ब्याज का पैसा बैंक तक जाता ही नहीं ये सब नक़द लिया दिया जाता है चैक सामने वाली पार्टी ने गारण्टी के तौर पर दिया होगा।

[@vijendrapatley-hi2lu]

लेकिन उसी चेक का misuse करते हैं सर ब्याज चलाने वाले 2,3 गुना अमाउंट भरके बाउंस करते है जो अन्याय है , ब्याज भी ले रहा है ,और 2,3 गुना अमाउंट भी लेना चाह रहा है।

[@vijendrapatley-hi2lu]

ये घटना मेरे साथ हुआ है अभी अब क्या करें लोग

[@nimeshvisen1443]

In ITR personal account sa diya fund pehla mention karna jaruri nahi profit ka lum sum amt pa return file hota ha current account company ka account main mention karna hota jab Paisa milega so can we get income toh tax bharega

[@Cba109]

If accused notice ke reply me khta h ki mera cheque chori ho gya h. While he did a agreement on stamp and also cheque no.mentioned on the stamp. Kya tb bhi itr wala issue samne aayega??

[@kamalsinghsisodiya-xz6cj]

सर किसान के तो इनकम टैक्स लगता नहीं है तो फिर वह इनकम टैक्स रिटर्न कहां से बताएगा

[@vikrant260]

Sir, what about ITR? The magistrate denied my (accused) appeal for the ITR of the complainant..and my so-called advocate didn't go higher court to challenge that magistrate decision. Can I do appeal to higher court for his ITR by myself?

[@kamalkumarsharma3660]

Sujhav dene ke liye very very thank

[@ajayshukla6365]

The high court has heard rightly and punished the defaulter.

[@deepakpatel3757]

बहुत सुंदर ज्ञानवर्धक जानकारी दिए इसके लिए धन्यवाद

[@aminkhatry4968]

Income tax return mein income ki detail jaati hai na ki lendar dendar ki especially in case of non audited returns case karne wala cross object nahi kar paya sahi tarike se

[@dssengar4795]

ऐसे ही फैसले आते गए तो लोगो का न्यायिक व्यवस्था पर से पूरा ही विश्वास उठ जायेगा, आधा तो पहले ही उठ चुका है और फिर समानांतर व्यवस्था जन्म लेगी तब आम जनता वही फीस बाहुबलियों को देकर न्याय कराएगी ओर उसके लिये ये जिम्मेदार ही जिम्मेदार होंगे।😢😢

[@Agarwalvarun14]

It seems that in this case Money has not been given by the person to the accused by the bank, and most cases come into the courts where money has been transacted through the bank... and no other evidence required in this types of case।

[@umeshkhandelwaal1324]

Can you provide any SC rulings where the case has been awarded wrongly..means case has been decided against the accused who in fact has not issued the chq rather they were stolen..now as per court order minimum stipulated amt has been deposited with the court. There are many other facts which will prove the case in favour of accused. I need a copy of any judgement where the ordered for not releasing the amount deposited as precondition to admit the appeal.

[@AnilKumar-ut3hc]

Excellent video sir Log 2 number ka Paisa byaj pe dekar garibo ka khun chuste hain or khud itr bhi nhi bharte

[@ripudamanjain7462]

sir ji namaskar 🙏 mera ek sawal he ki jaise ki kisi ke pita ki koi farm he or unke bete ne pita ke sine karke kisi party ko payment ke liya diya ! or samne wale ko ye nhi pta ki uske sath aisa kiya ja rha he ! 9 sall case chalne ke bad wo aake bole ki mera chak nhi he . mujhe nhi pta ki kisne ye chak diya he or meri ye farm nhi he . or fir is case me ek dum nya mod aaya . ab hume kya karna chahiye ji . Sahyog kare ji . 🙏

[@wahegurusatnam612]

What about tractor loan case even after check bounce farmer is paying all emi till tenure

[@840117849]

Thank you so much for nive nice information

[@vinay108322]

I am filing my ITR from last 20+ years. Which section of ITR requires to declare if i have lended any money to anyone? If someone knows please enlighten me. I guess the whole argument to that it was not past of ITR itself is wrong. Many times you lend it without any documentation in good faith. However, surprised to see, SC even didn't looked at the fact that the cheque was issued and never examined that why this cheque was issued? Was it for charity?😅

[@offred6013]

Under s 138 of NI Act an offence can be made out only if its prooved that the cheque was drawn to discharge a debt. No debt means no offence under 138 of NI Act. Allthough remedy under some other law could still be obtained but not under 138 of NI

[@vadera74]

In income tax return we file our income statement only not the debts given. The person filing the case is farmer not a business firm. In business firm or the person whose accounts are audited then this prove comes in audit report only, then also it doesn't come in income tax return.

[@vaibhavkale7887]

Show as unsecured loan given

[@sopanshevale8515]

Yes any amount paid to anybody does not concern to Income Tax return. No where it reflect in Income Tax return. Taking Income Tax in consideration is wrong

[@chanderparam-ky2ef]

If 138 case main final decision se pahle cheque ka full payment ho Jaye Kya uske bad bhi case Banta Hai kya ?

[@atulgandhi4549]

Sir , if complaint have written off amount from his books , then can accused take this as his defence ?

[@AshokKumar-jn3zj]

Sir mujhe ye puchna hai ki mera bhi cheque bounce ka case hai... Mai khud court me Gaya tha mere wakil nhi gye the..mujhe court me ye bola ki aap ek notice banwa lo ahlmad se... Is notice ka kya matlab hota hai...maine net pe check kiya tha jo meri last date ki report thi usme likha tha dasti notice chipkaya jaye aisa kuch likha tha plz bataye

[@1BLSHARMA]

Sir Also cover the position of Non executive directors/ Independent Directors in cheque bouncing case

[@UlhasMakhi-ww6dr]

धन्यवाद

[@nitingandhi8750]

But agar sachi mai kisine paise diye hai aur uske paas kahi koi entry nahi hai toh uske paise doob gaye matlab Accused toh bach gaya par jisne sach mai diye hai uska kya Us point of view se solution bataye toh logo ki madat ho payegi kyuki accused ne cheque toh issue kiya jo bounce hua hai uska kya

[@bff-befinanciallyfree]

Bank to transfer kiya ho, or statement me entry ho to case kar sakte hain?

[@ajayshukla6365]

SC makes hands free to commit crime like this. If someone has issued the cheque for any purpose then what is the meaning of acquittle. Why did he issue a cheque? Something has transferred and he issued a check. He should be punished for the issue of a cheque.

[@vikasparody]

Lekin udhar only 87000 diye h aur kahi bhi entry nhi ki h tab kya hoga ? Accessed bach jayega ya nhi ?

[@sushildutt8817]

Wakeel sahab kisi ne rtgs ya imps se payment kiya ho party ko tab kese ye supreme court ka decision applicable hoga online payment apne aap me proof hai payment dene ka...

[@knowledgeideas5738]

Bank entry hai Income tax return m show kiya hai Written proof on stamp paper hai then also court tarik par tarik deti hai😡 Harsh reality don’t give money to any one FD kardo ya invest kardo

[@Hindustani.Talent]

Same case mera hai bro, abhi file krunga case September me

[@omparkash6142]

When bank transaction of funds transfer is there to prove that money has been lended then no need to show in ITR as the money is expected to come back.

[@sharadamohanty5629]

I agree.

[@srikantamohanty4214]

Right, no loan to be given in exchange of cheque.

[@VipinSingh-uj4bf]

ये भी सही है... चोरों को और बढ़ावा दिया जाये... 😂😂😂

[@tksarmah2632]

What if tax paid money was invested in a partnership firm and the other partner refuses to refund the capital plus part the agreed % of profit . In that case what would be the issue of ITR ?

[@anarkela7162]

Specic performance

[@higgsblowfacts]

Aree Sir Income tax me nakli entry bhi dikha sakte hai.. income tax galat bhi bana sakte hai paise udhar diyee hai dikhane ko

[@pranamjain4507]

Complainant can also be examined u/s 145 of NI Act by the Accused.

[@anarkela7162]

Notice ka reply nahi diya toh rule of promisry estopple apply hoga SC is wrong n confused

[@jaishetty4469]

@@anarkela7162 Not really. transaction of even rupees 100 is not valid, unless there is a cash receipt /or a bank acknowledgement.

[@indersinghranga6645]

Is tareh k judgment se ek aam admi ka bharosa uth rha h court se

[@turambiruly2539]

चेक financial transaction से संबंधित हो । यदि कोई gift cheque हो तो उसे चुनौती नहीं दी जा सकती ।

[@panant107]

To save 3 lacks how much did he spend time and money and case is closed here on earth but it's not closed in God's Kingdom. Falling moral, ethical values gives rise to many problems which we are facing now.

[@jaishetty4469]

tera bolvachan yahan maine nahi rakhta. we are discussing "legal" things, where there is no "God"

[@pradeepkumargarg6040]

इस फैसले को रद्द करने की जरूरत है। पैसे के लेन-देन का हिसाब रखना आपका अधिकार है जिम्मेदारी नहीं, प्रत्येक लेन-देन का हिसाब देना न तो आयकर रिटर्न में जरुरी है और न ही किसी और आर्थिक कानून में। इस फैसले से चैक पेमेंट ही भरोसेमंद नहीं रह जाएगा और NI Act ही रद्द करने योग्य हो जाएगा

[@veerupakshappagulshetti4298]

I have paid amount to accused through cheque but that amount is my pension amount. Is it enough to prove in the law of court.

[@kunaldivekar9830]

Sir ap ye bolrahe he wo thik ahe lekin agar jo 3 luck Rs chek ke madhyam se ya online acus ke account me bheje hoge or account me 3 luck ki intry hogi firbhi it return ki jarurat he kya

[@NarendraSingh-ol5mx]

Nhi hai, jab toh usne prove hi kar diya na k paise diye hain

[@vijaykumarnightandevents9812]

Dhanyawad dear sir. Vandan

[@user-un1tc8hk6z]

Mere peso ka kya hoga jo mene kisi ko hath udhar diya tha fir bad me udhar lene Wale ne mujhe cheque likhkar diya tha jo mere dwara bank me lagane k bad me wo cheque bounce ho gya tha...agar aisa kanoon aya to fir is desh k kanoon pr se bharosa hi khatm ho jayega

[@omeg4agaming314]

Maine ek byakti ko 1 lack udhar diya 6% int. Ab wo amount karib 2lack ho gaya par udhar pene wale byakti mera paisa wapos nehin kya par mujhe 2lack ka ek cheque diya .mujhe pura umeed hai k wo cheque bounced hoga .ab mujhe kya karna chahiye . Maine 1lack uske bank khate main transfer kya tha .kya mera paisa wapos milega ?

[@prosendas8650]

Market ma yah koi related rupiya data tha ab koi kisiko nahi daga or bank ya or kisi sa low tab ka app mara sa better janya hai Thinking you

[@mi8767]

Blank check par sign lekar pareshan kiya jata haye... Pooree check book par sign leliye jata hayr

[@rajnisood9626]

Thanks sir,i am also facing this problem

[@anarkela7162]

Draft cleverly

[@SanjaySingh-dg4vl]

Sir. Aap kis prakar ki samasya ka samna kar rahe hain shriman Ji kripya batao...

[@harashylander1321]

Previously in india our ancestors in one day they is to give judgement, now by following westerners we get justice delayed which justice denied 🌺🌸✋😑

[@aashishkumarshukla]

पैसा हड़पना सिखाया जा रहा है। चेक instrument फिर क्या गान के लिए *दिया लिया* गया था। कोर्ट में घुमाने के तरीके अपनाए जा रहे हैं क्या??.. जो मन मर्जी आई उसे सिद्ध करने का आधार बना दिया??🤔.. ,🚩

[@jitendrapol4728]

भाईसाहब ये देश का अर्थतंत्र चलाने का चक्कर है, जो चेक लेकर फसा है वो स्टाम्प ड्युटी भरेगा, वकील के लिए पैसा देगा,तारीख पे हाजरी लगाने के लिए प्रवास करेगा , झेराक्स वाले का दुकान चलेगा , हाॅटेल वाले का धंदा होगा , इसलिए तो लाखो केस अटके है और वादी चक्कर काटे है

[@krdeeraj]

Chori Aur Sinajori yhi to durbhagya he hmare desh ka. aur choro ko takat milti he ese advocate se...........jo sb jante hue bhi bus kujh paiso ke liye inka sath dete he.......😔

[@bulliesist]

Thanks❤

[@DevishankerBairwa-jj3nl]

Thanks jankari sir

[@neeravsharma8810]

Loop holes in our judicial system... Tabhi bohat se log bach jaate hain

[@GurmeetSingh-rl9fd]

VERY NICE INFORMATION SIR

[@shivpalsinghjadaun5025]

बेईमान को लाभ मिलेगा और ईमानदार को नुकसान होगा।

[@virshanyadav8211]

Check bounce hone ke corona Aya aur maine ab tak koi complent nahi ki hai to kitane dini valid rahega

[@user-dn2iq1pw2s]

Sir mene 1 aadmi ko security ke tor par bina signature ke blank cheque diye hai toh usme mere upar Cheque bounce ka case ho sakta hai please reply me sir bahut tension mai hu 😢😢😢😢😢

[@rahulrajmodi10]

Sahi cheez sikha rahe hai aap

[@dilipupadhyay]

Few judges & lawyers consider themselves above Parliament & they keep giving judgments anti goverment and in favor if antisocial, anti national interest , and thats might be to become famous, or to make money by corruption,or just to please opposition leaders with whom they are mentally attached . Its very important that upgrading court procedures, labour & land laws immediately. Many foreign manufactures are not coming to India is the real reason of problems of acquiring land and laws in favor of workers. Priority is to improve fast judgments by reducing court holidays .

[@vidyanohtha-rd2pj]

Ek check mera b bounce huaa h or wo mere husband ne Diya usne section 125 me court k ander mujhe ek check diya or wo bounce ho gya ab uspe kya hoga

[@advhimanshu4648]

Thnkü......

[@kidsshortsfunnygames5077]

Sir hamaray SOC nay ek ka bank may stop payment Kiya tho uska chq bonus ho gaya abhi usnay soc. Kay uper case kiya hey Ap solutions bata saktay hey