How Osman Ghazi Built an Empire That Lasted 600 Years? | Ottoman Empire #1

[@farhanishrak5555]

“We do not conquer the lands, we conquer the hearts.” - Mehmed II

[@mdsaqlainimam7627]

Brother dont give up , we are waiting for your next video ❤ keep it up beother ❤🎉

[@Birdeagle100]

historic battles is the greatest

[@HISTMARC]

Nice video❤🎉

[@Gb80788]

Found ur youtube channel today. Keep going Algorithm is kicking in.

[@rinaldicansino56]

GREAT VIDEO, 👍

[@mdsaqlainimam7627]

Are you going to upload the hext video to about orhan and then his son and then his son ?

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

He hearted, it seems like a yes😅

[@thekinghass]

I wish for this series to couniue and see great series for this interesting history

[@taymur_shah]

Underrated bro 💖💖

[@gladysmirandaserra9860]

Excelente vídeo. A história do Império Otomano com Ertugrul Osman são sensacionais.

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

Osman ghazi was an actually big sultan. But because he was the first, people dont know about him so much. He was so clever and the founder, who set the basis strategy for the Ottomans, which is "Conquer through Constantinople and Europe". The ottomans followed this "doctrin" in all their lifetime. He was a great leader for both Turks, Muslims and humanity, he was merciful. RIP

[@chancedelgado6520]

Like how this could be apart of the mongol mix as well

[@not_tanweer_70-1]

They say Atatürk is the father of Turks but I believe Osman Gazi is the father of Turks(in my opinion)

[@blancac6620]

Ataturk it’s father of modern Turks

[@Ottoman_Empire_C]

OSMAN GAZI FATHER OF THE TURKS 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

[@Techtalk2030]

“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”

[@Techtalk2030]

“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century "Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire. Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”

[@birkandemircan7858]

Sizin bildiğiniz her şey yanlış.Osmanoğlu olarak yazıyorum ; Biz Türküz ve Türklük şeref , Namus , savaşçı , adil , Nazik , Heybetli , Sanatçı , Akıllı , Çevik ve güçsüze dosttur.Biz Oğuz boyunun Kayı kolundan geliyoruz.Ve biz gibi 14 kol daha vardır…Hepsi Türk’tür ve akın akın şimşek gibi yağarız.Osmanoğulları olarak Türklüğümüzü hiç bir zaman inkar etmedik…Bunu inkar etmek bizi işte o zaman düşük gösterir…Türklük Allah’ın bize vermiş olduğu yüce bir kimliktir.Tarihi sizin tarihinizden daha çok zaferlerle dolu bir ırktan bahsederken kelimelerinize dikkat edin…

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

@@Techtalk2030 you are spamming the same message. So i do also: " bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much.."

[@Techtalk2030]

“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”

[@Techtalk2030]

“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century "Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire. Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much..

[@HistoryCentered]

make pt2 pt 3 etc

[@rinaldicansino56]

Yes, will be WAITING..

[@Sawolsped]

Next year

[@EdukasiPerpus]

subtitelnya dibenerin dong

[@kushtrimb.7908]

He didn’t “ build “ it , he started it

[@fwrususes5125]

He founded Ottomans as state

[@kushtrimb.7908]

@ the next 10 rulers during their time made the empire strong reaching its peak

[@ImranKhan-og6kb]

The great ottoman empire

[@rababeldah9543]

Sheikh edibali daughter is Bala hatun not Malhun hatun and his first wife was Bala hatun ❤

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

There are different names in different sources, i think the channel preferred one of them

[@historicalmaps-u8j]

osman bey ki life history dekhny ky liyy mera channel visit karyn urdu ma maps per @lesson Of History On Map

[@NoorhabibHejazAhmed]

We don't know for sure

[@hamadDar-iw7li]

stop believing those turkish dramas

[@Messi-and-Ronaldo-o]

Bro, why are you stealing content

[@megalodon3655]

This is harp tahiri’s second channel.

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

He doesn't steal content? What do you mean?

[@muhammetpetekcipetekci2147]

Father of Turks

[@NumanSenogul]

👍👌

[@facundoarielcarrizzo]

🤩🤩

[@kubrayrbsmz]

🎉🎉

[@Nightmare_of_Konoha]

Please add subs 😢

[@birkandemircan7858]

Türklerin atası Osman bey değildir.Türklerin atası kayıtlı ilk tarihe göre Milattan önce 2500 Oğuz , Teoman , Metehandır.Kayıt dışı olarak da Nuh Peygamberin oğlu Yafesten geldiğine inanılır…O da Milattan önce 4500 dür

[@OmerFaruk-dc4xo]

Kimse atası demiyor ki zaten😅

[@Baran_1903]

Lan harp tarihi