History of CAA lies in the history of 1948: Abhinav Chandrachud [Mumbai Collective 2020]

[@praveennair7917]

He is a better speaker than even the greatest exponent of English, Shashi Tharoor. This young man's a pleasure to listen to. The points are very clearly explained and there is no convolations and obfuscation of sentences that confuse the listener or deliberate use of words that even most native English speakers would be hard pressed to understand. Hats off to this young man for speaking to the audience and not at or over it.

[@afsarrayni1718]

I wish If could learn and speak English like you..

[@shakilasureshbabu9508]

Finally one truly articulate and elucidative speaker on the CAA, it’s origins, history , it’s parent law , detailing the great migration and its underlying unconstitutional consequences and enforcements that were concisely yet thoroughly explained by Abhishek. Thank you for doing your homework so well, without bias and judgement .

[@ishikinokami1575]

There was a bias

[@Loveyourself2moon]

And his father is Supreme Court judge..!!!

[@BTboy21]

Sooo what

[@scientific6929]

For you think all these points not validated , Gov't has done all home work, this Chandra chud is just side line points looks like unconstitutional all points are taken consideration as of 1947 people emotions not the present liberal jihadis, at that time of 1947 all muslims felt they don't have any right in India as they voted more than 90% for Pakistan now how they get right on India just we allowed some for courtesy

[@mohammadmobeen2667]

@@scientific6929 go & check your facts at that only 10-15% people are allowed to vote those who are elite.....So how 90% muslims had voted for pakistan😅

[@ADITYASINGH-0811]

@@mohammadmobeen2667 exactly,out of a population of 3.5 Muslims in India only 4.5 lakh voted for Pakistan and 2.9 crores muslims never got the right to vote as per the government of India act 1935

[@sanjaysharma3413]

Rahul Gandhi's father , grandmother,great grandfather were pm of India.

[@parwaazshaheen6426]

Such an indepth arguments .. Our country needs youths like u Thank u so much

[@basantbaitha9494]

I saw his face I thought he looks like SC judge D Y Chandrachud. I was right.

[@spshashwat1]

He is Justice Chandrachud' s son.

[@ShaanMenon]

@@spshashwat1 and Justice (Retd) YV Chandrachud's Grandson and brother of Chintan Chandrachud, author of book Cases India Forgot!

[@mmdmm6]

*people like him must be in politics.. But we choose whom? Sadhvi Pradnya.. Sakshi maharaj...Yogi adityanath*

[@markianaslam8468]

mmdmm6 he talk about constitution history etc but these goons gets vote on Bhagwan key naam par vote dedo.

[@markianaslam8468]

Scorer Scored Owesi might be Mumta Arvind won’t ask Bhagwan key nampar they will ask only on kampar. Owesi won’t be harmful has he represented only 0.2% of population only if he is not having Hindus employee in his own medical arts and engineering colleges and also Hindu staff in his own hospital than it would be serious concern. Congress make manmohan Singh as PM candidates after Sikh riots but till todate muslim won’t vote Modi should understand the reason. But explaining you is similar explaining the stone. But it’s my duty to keep explaining.

[@monojdas-gupta5918]

Most certainly not in politics. Who will then look after the shop to keep the politicians on their toes.

[@manusharma5879]

@@markianaslam8468 *true...Good explained*

[@manusharma5879]

@Scorer Scored *what about "sant modi and tadipaar"* *🔻बंगाल* में मुकुल राय शारदा चिट फंड घोटाले के आरोपी थे, *भाजपा में शामिल हुए- केस बंद* *🔻कर्नाटक* में रेड्डी बंधुओं पर माइनिंग घोटाला था, *भाजपा में शामिल - केस बंद* *🔻यद्दुरप्पा* का भ्रष्टाचार किसी परिचय का मोहताज नही- उसको *मुख्यमंत्री* बनाया *🔻झारखंड* में BP सहाय दवा घोटाले में आरोपी थे, *भाजपा में शामिल- केस बंद* *🔻महाराष्ट्र* में नारायण राणे आदर्श घोटाले में लिप्त थे, *भाजपा में शामिल- केस बंद* *🔻असम* में भाजपा ने हेमंत बिश्व शर्मा PWD घोटाले के आरोप लगाए थे, *भाजपा में शामिल- केस खत्म* *🔻दुष्यंत चौटाला* ने भाजपा को समर्थन दिया, अगले दिन *पिता जेल से बाहर* *🔻अजित पवार ने भाजपा* के साथ महाराष्ट्र की सरकार बनाई, अगले दिन 9 *केस से बरी* हुए *🤷‍♂आज के बाद कोई कहे कि मोदी ईमानदार-देशभक्त है,भ्रष्टाचार से लड़ रहा है और भ्रष्ट नेताओं को खत्म करने आया है तो उसे हस कर "मुर्ख समझकर" माफ कर देना🤷‍♂* *मनु शर्मा....* ✍🏼 🤣🤪🤣🤪🤣🤪🤣🤣

[@Amir-lt7md]

Well said sir .. I wish our parliament members had 1% of your knowledge because if they had indians would've not suffered

[@sidhart7482]

Why he is not on TV channels crores of people will understand the whole matter.. Salute to u man.. Jai hind

[@suchitraroy1758]

He makes very good points against this law, however, I wish he had also explained how to solve this problem. After identifying the problem one also has to find a solution for it.

[@arpittripathi2945]

I don't think anyone or he himself can solve the problem....it is upto the supreme court only but there also hope is very less...

[@OmNileshPawar]

Perfect, without solution, only debate is useless

[@stritlit]

Fortunately enough that's not his problem; If he were to file a petition it's not his problem to find a solution but the Apex Court's and the Government's.

[@endless812]

Identify the refugees and remove their name from voter list. And let them stay under refugees policy.

[@atul1024]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmWrkpejaMiEoLM Just educate people with this ,, If you fail to understand this channel then you are far away from truth

[@fauziasajid]

We often listen a phrase " beauty with brain" but now time has come to change with" brave with brain" like Abhinav and thousands like him. Thanks

[@arshadjafri6163]

This is called education with knowledge, very happy to hear this man.

[@twobroketravellers8428]

He will get jannat??

[@wangsterkonyak7273]

Imagine all this questions were put to amit Shah in a live debate...... He(amit Shah) would b like mai madarchood hu Jo is debate mai aaya😂

[@blueheaven4838]

😂😂😂.

[@amitshende79]

You nailed it Bro...🤣

[@seeandgrow]

great sense of humor

[@rehanmomin6550]

@@seeandgrow that's trueee

[@surajbadajena3983]

Lauda

[@MoumantiPodder]

~10:17 -- you are love, Abhinav Chandrachud Ji... thank you for such a detailed, knowledgeable, cognizant discussion

[@atul1024]

Moumanti Podder kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmWrkpejaMiEoLM If you fail to understand this channel then you are far away from truth

[@madetosing7342]

Who are coming here after cji of India sir chandrachud's India today interview.

[@Rahul...s]

Arguments(in this speech) are indeed compelling yet they miserably fail in proving CAA to be unconstitutional

[@ramachandrannarayanan2402]

How?

[@shirazkhader3481]

Abhinav Chandrachud Sir We thank you Sir. Excellent well said

[@guruprasad3012]

Shiraz Khader 👏

[@hemabharat1972]

The origin of the Citizenship act in India is "unsecular".According to the speaker himself the leaders then were impeccably secular.Why then were the portions of the act u secular?There were strong reasons beyond religion then.Those very reasons are still relevant. Where was the reason for this speaker to paraphrase Patel's letter?Betrays his bias and intellectual dishonesty despite his learning. He has spoken about orphans,atheists and transgenders,but not a word about Srilankan Tamils.Can he be called anti Tamil?Certainly not.Everything has a context.One can go on and on condemning every legislation.Is there anything wrong in the identified groups. He has not explained what is wrong with the groups identified because nothing is wrong.

[@genshinimpactgameguides2158]

sadly most of the people commenting here fail to see this

[@AkshayDhargave]

Prioritising people of certain religion from certain countries is what's unconstitutional here.

[@anandbm7715]

He has not spoken of Tamils, because Tamils are Hindus, sir

[@chetaliarts4981]

True... Completely agree with u...

[@piyush-cg9rj]

Not once in the speech he has said that hindus or sikhs or the others should not get the benefits of caa..What the protestors and the people against this law are demanding is the inclusion of the others who have been excluded...The call is for an amendment to the caa....To include the other prosecuted people(including Tamils) not for the exclusion of hindus and sikhs and the others.

[@rakshatsrivastav873]

I lost him at 8:15. He acknowledges that many would have forced to convert to Islam and then quickly snaps to the nonsecular credentials of the constitution

[@Ahmed-yf5en]

I think you should hear the whole context atleast two times then you realise that he was talking about the provisions of permits

[@pawanharsha1041]

There is a flaw his argument, he doesn't prove the law is unconstitutional by it's intrinsic character but by what it has excluded. That can always be argued as a policy decision based on the situation and can't be argued as unconstitutional unless proven to be malafide in nature. And there is already a precedent set where India have given citizenship to certain groups. So there is an equally compelling argument on the other side.

[@shambhavidwivedi5817]

Pawan Harsha very sharp observation. Fab

[@SushanthSomayaji]

There are neither extenuating circumstances nor there is any reasonable classification of the illegal immigrants explained in the law.

[@jmadduri7411]

There are several flaws in his argument. The historical basis that he talks about Muslims returning to India from west Pakistan. He forgets to mention or conveniently omits the fact more than 80% of Muslims in unpartitioned India voted for separate Pakistan. So government of India is just in preventing their come back and giving priority to non Muslims coming in especially because non Muslims are being persecuted... he himself mentions they being persecuted. He is talk only talking technical points without any humanitarian point of view. His point about other religions and transgenders is illogical. This amendment was for specific set of people who are living refugee camps in India who were unable work or go to school. They enumerated who were in the refugee camps and listed their religions. It is as simple as that. But high intellectuals like him and people commenting here don’t understand basic things.

[@pragyaawasthi6897]

Yes absolutely! Only bcos something is excluded doesn't mean that it is unconstitutional. The validity of an Act is seen by it's scope

[@santa4091]

These are sugar coated lectures keeping aside pragmatism. Having degrees don't make you a pragmatist. There was a population exchange in Punjab. So people who came from West Pakistan could easily settle in Punjab. But nothing of that sort happened in Bengal. Muslims in West Bengal didn't cross over to East Bengal, but Hindus of East Bengal crossed over to India (Assam and West Bengal) in millions. This created ethnic problems not only in Assam but to some extent in West Bengal also, especially in northern Bengal. Fresh influx of East Bengalis into Assam and West Bengal happened during the Bangladesh war. 2.5 million Bengali Hindus were killed by Pakistanis. CAA is meant for these persecuted minorities of Bangladesh. CPI (M), during their rule butchered certain East Bengalis who took refuge in marich jhapi, in the Sundarbans.

[@aniquaamir7234]

A million likes for your intelligent and honest service to mankind. May God bless you and you rise higher and higher in life

[@vvnconsultants4876]

Let me admit that l am not Modi Bhakt , but a liberal religious person , proud of my religion inclusive of other religions. I disagree with Anubhav on categorising CAA is unconstitutional. The reason is what ever the articles of constitution which he is referring are applicable to Registered Indian Citizens as per constitution but not applicable to refugees or illegal immigrants. I disagree with him on second point of Bangladesh immigrants , when the original CAA proposed in 1948 to restrict or prevent lndian Muslims who went to Pakistan ( don't differentiate east or west Pakistan ) and like to return to India . He is interpreting to his own convenience of winning the argument on why the Bangladesh Muslims are excluded . Point 3, 1948 , our constitution was not added the clause is secular , but it was later annexed during Indira Regime , just to win Muslim Votes. 4. One must remember the situation will keep changing based on the circumstances. The law which was applicable today may not be good for tomorrow. I am against protest and processions towards CAA as that is already passed in Parliament. If we are not satisfied with the present regime just throw it in next general elections as we have done in the past . I don't like anyone to troll me , if you have substance in argument , please address . If you troll my posting what is different between you and Bhakts or desh drohis . I request youth to ask and question the present to provide , employment opportunities , improve quality of education standards and affordable and health sectors , instead of becoming fray to BJPs trap . Arise and awake . Jai Hind , Bharat Mataki Jai.

[@hadhiksasuke]

He only referred to article 14 which is equality before law is applicable to every person whether they are citizen or not. It's same as article 21 which is right to life. Article 14 and 21(only if they are sentenced to death) are enjoyed by every person in the territory of India. These are universally accepted. Then he said article 19 which is not a question of argument here because it doesn't come under the act.

[@hadhiksasuke]

You see secularity is already in the constitution fabric. The court itself said the preamble is the basic structure and nothing thats in the preamble can never be amended. Preamble can be upgraded as you said as per coming years. Supreme court also held that further views on new inclusion into preamble can be said through time but can never exclude what's already there.

[@bitik9847]

What you said is True. Constitution doesn't apply to outsiders or immigrants, CAA is constitutional. Muslims living in India shouldn't fear.

[@lachmangoyal21]

kmaal krdi chhore ne.....before seeing this video i did not like the lawyer profession...but after seeing this i fall in love with the profession

[@Karf5544]

Wisdom come from humbleness. Some other in india claiming they are more wise and act in superciliousness, prejudice.

[@shaheedbhaghatsingh3974]

RIP English bro but yea he does present a compelling argument lol

[@sanjaysharma3413]

If he has such right facts and thinks CAA is unconstitutional then why don't he come out and file a petition against CAA which only the opposition keeps filing. He won't do it because he knows that in court he will loose and damage his reputation.

[@cranberrysoup2318]

sanjay sharma why don't you find out whether he has filed a petition or not? ×_×

[@NoobMaster-or2jf]

I swear the media does not even know the basics to put forth a counter argument for the CAA.

[@navaneethku]

Did you watch the video

[@NoobMaster-or2jf]

@@navaneethku I did.

[@nicknara04]

Did guy dont know the ABC of CAA, he says discrimination how can a citizen who is not in anyway affected by the law be in a position of being discriminated. I am quite surprised that people are looking up on somebody who does not understand the basics of this particular ACT.

[@ananthakrishnap5507]

*NRC - National Register for Citizens* • A nation wide NRC is yet to be drafted, until it is drafted and tabled in the parliament, people shouldn't jump into any conclusion. • Basically it won't allow any illegal immigrants to stay in India. • People who posses the required documents that will stated by the govt in the nation-wide NRC BILL will be acknowledged as citizens and rest can also apply for citizenship as per citizenship act 1955, section 5 or section 6. • The current NRC is only applicable to Assam and refraining from assuming that the same shall be applied for the whole nation.

[@mohdarham7390]

Chandrachud's intellectual and wisdom never diminished ✨👍🏻

[@Tume791]

There was huge applause when he said that What about Atheist ? They believe there is no God. 😁

[@ma7ur97]

😂😂😂

[@mohammadmobeen2667]

May be they are liberals.....The respect everyone's feeling & everyone's belief....I am a person who believe in God but if I was present at that places then I too had applauded

[@satyapriyadarshi93]

@@mohammadmobeen2667 true

[@Tume791]

@@mohammadmobeen2667 sure sir. 😊

[@varunpandey1484]

Go to adnaman and nicobar

[@Mr_Rain_Forest]

Ye anpadh hai, Isko congress ne bhadkaya hai, Humne whatsapp group me parha tha k CAA se India k sari problems solve hojayengi.

[@blitzkrieg5454]

Sarcasm level = 99999999

[@Junaidk19]

WhatsApp University 😂🤪

[@Nirbhay_Singh_Baghel]

Lagta hai galt watsapp university se degree le li....

[@mdtalibalam9743]

kitne bhakto ka dil tod diya tune

[@Nirbhay_Singh_Baghel]

@@mdtalibalam9743 kya kre yaar padhi kr li thodi bahot aur Dimag chalta hai abhi

[@Shubhangisamare]

6/2/2024 7 : 15 pm सभी अनुभवोंसे नागरिकों को दिशा देते हर दशाए सामने रखना एक उत्तम कुशलता है ! नाईस व्हिडिओ 🎉

[@VenkatPrasad]

His arguments are good but also flawed, He willingly chooses to ignore the specifics of the CAA. Like 1. CAA is to help existing "The Persecuted Minorities from 3 specific countries with whom India shares its Borders". This is addressed as a "specific case" with respect to the Citizenship Act. The act that has been amended 5 times prior to 2019 2. Ahmadis and Shias are self-confessed and constitutionally addressed as Muslims in India. Here CAA is based on our constitutional definition of Muslims which encompasses them as legally Muslims too. FYI google - Ahmadis and Lahore Resolution 3. There are no Jews existing in any of the 3 Islamic nations thus Jew not added. Iran does not share its borders with India and thus does not fall into the specif case addressed in CAA. 4. Comparing UK with Islamic countries to suggest a theological state can be secular is deriving false equivalence. UK has not persecuted its religious minorities. His examples are good but don't apply to the situation CAA intends to focus on. I understand why Govt is on a strong footing with respect to CAA and its constitutional validity. Anti CAA people may enjoy this session for it validates their stand but then there is always more than 1 side to a situation.

[@jmadduri7411]

Venkat Prasaad finally someone with sense. Great job countering. Looking at other comments just praising this guy makes me think most People blindly follow without reading and thinking for themselves and claim themselves as high intellectuals. Rarely I find someone with original thinking. Thank you for taking the time to write this.

[@Dobbythekindelf]

I agree

[@mrdebraj]

@Venkat Prasad: I see that you miss the main point. But let's address your issues. 1. The singling out of specific classes arbitrarily is unconstitutional. We are a secular nation, and if any reprieve is to be granted, it has to be granted irrespective of arbitrary classification, especially if the said classification is not upheld by the constitution. I mean really, why does the CAA have so little compassion for people not comming under its purview? And if this is for practical reasons of limited resources, why this expedient leniency to certain select classes on religious grounds? This itself has a hidden assumption that these select hallowed classes are somehow more entitled to live in India. 2. If you are considering religious persecution in another country, its system of classification has to be kept in mind as the persecution is based on those. Not on the basis of Indian classification. Also, you seem to forget the other classes the speaker mentions: atheists, other racial, gender and sexual minorities. Orphans, people abandoned at their birth... What about people who have converted their religion (and may convert in future)? 3. How can we have data that there is not, and never was, even a single jew who migrated from these countries to India? Could you please cite sources? Most data have the word 'other' for trace categories. The law is not to exclude people just because they happen to be a minority. 4. This was not actually a public speech. It was to the law community. So the speaker mentioned the UK to show the logical distinction between a theocratic and a secular state. Not every debate is about street-wit. I believe the legal and logical basis was very much a reason for the discussion.

[@VenkatPrasad]

@@mrdebraj I see your point but your argument also misses some points 1. I believe you are quoting Article 14 which forbids is class-legislation but it does not forbid reasonable classification. The classification, however, must not be “arbitrary, artificial or evasive” *but must be based on some real and substantial bearing a just and reasonable relation to the object sought to be achieved by the legislation*. The classification is based on "Religious Persecution" which also is the Statement of Objects and Reasons. The amendment attends ONLY to those who are recognized as persecuted for their practicing religion in their respective countries. Classification by CAA is reasonable enough as it is based on "intelligible differentia". 2. And if this is for practical reasons of limited resources, why this expedient leniency to certain select classes on religious grounds? - Coz their persecution and exodus have not stopped and ignoring them for decades has not solved the problem. CAA addresses a problem that should ideally have been solved decades back. But then no one cared to fix the problem for those who came to India seeking refuge from religious persecution. The limited resources is the stark reality of India, Its an economic consideration that Govt needs to weigh in, looking at the larger scheme of things. You don't need to but the Govt of the Day needs to Balance Compassion with Pragmatism and Reality at hand. 3. If you are considering religious persecution in another country, its system of classification has to be kept in mind as the persecution is based on those - Not Necessarily since classification by the state and by the sect are contradictory in nature. For example Shia's are not considered Muslims by the state of Pakistan but Shias believe they are staunch Muslims. Here the definition that you suggest becomes contradictory in nature. 4. lso, you seem to forget the other classes the speaker mentions: atheists, other racial, gender and sexual minorities. Orphans, people abandoned at their birth... What about people who have converted their religion (and may convert in future)? - For all of them the regular way to get citizenship through naturalization is still open. CAA is for people who have come to India pre 2014. The classes you specified will be given citizenship on case to case basis when they come to India. Again CAA is for a Specific case of "Religious Persecution" and it ends there. 5. How can we have data that there is not, and never was, even a single jew who migrated from these countries to India? Could you please cite sources? Most data have the word 'other' for trace categories. The law is not to exclude people just because they happen to be a minority. - I was wrong about no Jews in Pakistan, as of my research there are some 200 jews still in Pakistan who should also have been added to the list but then I also read they choose to go to Isreal and rather than come to India. So yeah the govt should have added them at least for the word even if they don't seek anything from India. Again, the argument is less of legal and more of ideological that I find in most cases. Your suspicion is with BJP and thus you imply that to the act as well. Your suspicion is your opinion as well so it ends there

[@pratikpattanaik]

@@VenkatPrasad If the matter is only of religious persecution, then we can only mention that as the criteria instead of explicitly stating any religions.There's simply no need to mention any religion. The reasonability of such classification is defeated by making religion as a class apart from religious persecution, by saying that Hindu, Sikh, etc. who were compelled to seek shelter in India due to religious persecution will not be recognised as illegal migrants. Ahmadiyas, who're persecuted in the listed countries and who've been living as refugees in India, are not covered by the Act. The selection of countries also doesn't bear a rational nexus to the object sought by the Act as there's persecution in other countries too, Sri Lankan Tamils and Tibetans being the case in point.

[@shirazkhader3481]

Secular Democratic Constitution . equality for each and everyone . Freedom for everyone

[@rohan8661]

Yaa have Muslim some day met in There so called biggest mosque in country were any non Muslim is not allowed

[@ananyalal7950]

You like talking about freedom only when in minority right? Pakistan is Indian Muslim majority, why no freedom for the minorities there. Don't expose yourself too much. Do you not have to right to vote here? If you have the right to vote you are free.

[@amitshende79]

@Scorer Scored Dear friend,this is the Beauty of our constitution...We can not be like Any Muslim country...Please don't compare our Great Nation to those of Saturated ,Conservative Mindset Countries...

[@srinivasa7949]

Shiraz Khader your problem is not for equality in india but for your foreign muslim illegal immigrants...

[@safiyaomer7878]

@Scorer Scored no muslim from any other nationality ..be it india or any other are not allowed to buy any piece of land in saudi .. no nationality is given to any human being ... saudi is only for saudis thats the principle of the formation of that country you are talking about .. but my country..which is my mother land having in its soil remains of my great great grand parents ... was eastablished on the thing called constitution which is secular.. #indian muslims are indians and will be indians!! remember the pledge in school .. india is my country and all indians are my brothers and sisters #satya mev jayate # if have attend atleat

[@azad_687]

One of the most intellectual lecture given by a youngman that i have ever listened.

[@Kavishbudy007]

@Scorer Scored brother hopefully you are equally literate in your vedas .. I would've appreciated you more had you give details of manu smriti and all Vedas!

[@shnwz3605]

@Scorer Scored beta WhatsApp University ki degree se veda padho hamare bare me samajhna utna asan nahi WhatsApp se

[@AbdullahKhan-cq7fm]

@Scorer Scored Are you serious? Stop getting shitty information from WhatsApp University and Wikiislam!!

[@ananyalal7950]

@@Kavishbudy007 Hinduism doesn't have holy book. Have you brother read the non-translated version of Vedas and Manusmriti to make such claims. Or are you just going by with someone's propaganda. Seems like what you said is as bad as Scorer Scored.

[@ananyalal7950]

@@shnwz3605 You know arabic?! Or you reading the Indianized version of Koran. I don't know Indian Muslims who actually know arabic. They think Urdu is arabic because it uses arabic script. But my Arab friends disagree, and since they are the original Muslims and Arabs I think they would know better about the Koranic translation.

[@vanshikasulaniya]

Mr. Chandrachud knows his jurisprudence well. Remarkably put.

[@neonatal123]

Marxist educated Idiots.

[@imranahmed5681]

Very deep sir thank you for sharing your precious knowledge.

[@tonydavis1305]

In a very simple and down to earth way you have untangled the most tangled issue on citizenship. Abhinav is such a breath of fresh air. I'm am sure both him and his brother Chintan Chandrachud and their breed of professionals will in years to come will make us Indians extremely proud. Best wishes in your future endeavors. God bless you.

[@heysup11]

Infact he can be the next cji too hehe and even his son( if he has one) could easily be one as well!

[@AvinashIT786]

10:22 I think you can't choose religion and surname. Athirst from Muslim family can't be considered as Minority?

[@moistmoisture]

Atheist are minority

[@truthseeker807]

There is no provision in CAA which says that they cannot apply for citizenship..they can apply... Its just an act for certain section who were persecuted that doesn't mean others can't apply... If they want they can apply follow the procedure and then become Indian... Like Adnan sami did.. if this simple thing people will read and understand then there won't be any protests

[@suryakantpatre4812]

This argument by Justice Chandrachud is a tight slap on the faces of blind educated bhakts who accept every shit the govt throws at us. Transgender throughout the country have been protesting for the same reason. The critics of CAA very rightly say that this is from the very first line an arbitrary law.

[@TheVkrant]

And Bhakts are burning the nation for such a inhuman law..

[@SANDSTORMASGAMES]

Really valid argument he is giving but bhakts will never understand.

[@thomasaugustine4413]

Superb! Like father like son. I am a big fan of Judge D.Y. Chandrachud, and I am glad that Abhnav too is like his father.

[@namangautam_stark]

Ye to fod dala.... Caa ki hearing isko krni chahiye... Kapil sibbal se na ho payga

[@saaaaa222]

Haha bro don't doubt the credentials of Kabil Sibbal. Moreover abhinav might not be able to argue if his father is in the bench 😆😆

[@proudindian9140]

coin ka ek side mat dekh

[@hp2084]

@@proudindian9140 exactly applies to you.

[@suptaguin3229]

@@saaaaa222 No I don't think so. Justice DY Chandrachud once overturned his father's decision.

[@saaaaa222]

Yes you can overturn your father's decision but you are not allowed to practice in a court that has your father as a judge.

[@tasleemvlogs3756]

Indeed it was one of the amazing speech I have ever heard. This illuminates and reveal insights of the matter.

[@tiaussardar8192]

Lovely lovely.....my questions all marked that is why we need youth ❤❤

[@sandysrini]

Pit an experienced lawyer & constitutional expert and then see if his arguments stand ground. It is always good to hear the other side of the coin especially for those who are sitting in the audience confronting the CAA

[@naazfarokhi1549]

Mr Abhinav ur speech was very impressive & too clear , thanks a lot for ur explanation to these fun politician’s 🙏

[@subirkumarbandyopadhyay9757]

It is right now transparent that our CONSTITUTION ,had seen the anamoly about PERMIT RULE was had a difference between the peoples those left our country India but few of them means about 10000 peoples per years had come in to our India from West Pakistan but Indian Government by Constitution allowed only 2000 per year as imigrent from West Pakistan they got under PERMIT RULE means they had only after July 1948 they were allowed to get re establishment only 2000 peoples has allowed to get entitled for PERMIT RULE.But HONOURABLE Practioner in Law Mr Avina va CHANDRACHUD sir from his heart drawn the great attention that our CONSTITUTION had DARK SIDE from this view as at that moment it was exceptional for those imigrent who leave our COUNTRY INDIA and went to East Pakistan those who were basically HINDU OR MUSHLIM personals had under same condition exceptional here several thousand even in lakh people was include for those who come back from East Pakistan .So he had a aim from humanity that equality is violating in such place though our Indian constitution is completely secular .So congrats sir for your strong argument for disclose the TRUTH .

[@sty4066]

Nowhere CAA talks of word 'muslim'.Saying 'persecuted minorities from 3 nations' is different from saying 'non-muslims'.Indian constitution's Art 14 validates CAA as it is pro - minority.JAI HIND

[@sty4066]

@makhbool ahmed Ahmadiyas were the ones who had created Pakistan, a separate nation for themselves...China is not a theocratic nation...Moreover,No Uyghur Muslim has come to India to seek shelter...many Hindus,Sikhs have come to India even before CAA bcoz they are being persecuted bcoz of their religion.

[@sty4066]

@makhbool ahmed So u want everyone from whole world to come to India???No..this is not guesthouse.It was promised by Bapuji and Nehru Liyaqat Pact..remove ur prejudice..u will get the answer....and yes...how can u say this is not related to Pakistan and partition???It is...Gandhiji had promised them..CAA is just implementing it..

[@sty4066]

@makhbool ahmed Ahmadiyas are not 'persecuted'.They are just considered 'non-muslims'..Their daughters are not forcefully married to Muslims unlike Hindus,Sikhs,Christians

[@sty4066]

@makhbool ahmed If Ahmadiyas feel discriminated, they should make another nation for themselves out of Pakistan...like they had made Pakistan...Jinnah alone couldn't have done anything without mass support in which Ahmadiyas were at the forefront..

[@sty4066]

@makhbool ahmed There is a reason why only these 3 countries...Afghanistan is part of Indian subcontinent..by ur logic...Nepal,Bhutan,Sri Lanka etc..Not at all..Taliban is the reason why Afghanistan

[@neel14045]

Bottom line is how to protect hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh who were abondoned during partition. This man has no answer. Useless talk unless he give some solution to the burning problem of minorities in Pakistan etc

[@pradeepchakraverti]

An exceptional explanation of some juridical principles. I salute the speaker.

[@bonnierksingh4181]

He is Justice D. Y. Chandrachud's son

[@pradeepchakraverti]

@@bonnierksingh4181 Yes, that is a fact which I know. However; he is 'Abhinav' in his own right and he shines in his own light!

[@atul1024]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmWrkpejaMiEoLM If you fail to understand this channel then you are far away from truth Just educate people with this

[@advaitinji9177]

Just think how much damage his father will do ...

[@ishikinokami1575]

Denying refuge to minorities that have been not just systemically persecuted like Hindus and Sikhs but also erased in countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh,is ANTI SECULAR. Saying refuge shall be given to those that are not being persecuted(Muslims of Pakistan and Bangladesh) is like saying reservations should be given to castes that were never oppressed like Bramhins.

[@dejavuvic1]

"ostensibly humanitarian object of the law (CAA)". CAA is only seemingly ON humanitarian ground. Thank you for your voice!

[@soumitroksharkar1434]

just 1 question to Abhinav Chandrachud - if somebody dump their new born baby into his home , what he will do.. its not the baby's fault to be in their home ... will he (Abhinav Chandrachud) not start going through the rule book or keep that kid or child into their own family...

[@theghost6314]

It's easy to question and doubt everything but difficult to even start resolving something.

[@Wasim_Raza]

now I can understand what actually sharjeel imam was saying.

[@rahulkalkura]

What?

[@BabuBanerjeeMagic]

Highly qualified professionals guy

[@Summupudi]

One of the most intellectual ans wise lectures ever heard. Such persons should be law makers

[@karansharma2544]

ya ya many intellectual were telling that article 370 cannot be scrapped and the rest is history... wait for the supreme court decision and you'll know who is intellectual

[@awsomeslayer1]

Why is it so difficult for people to understand that CAA does not prevent either jews, atheist or agnostics from pursuing citizenship in India. It only provides a single narrow window for certain religions which are en masse persecuted on the basis of religion. Why were EWS and OBC sections given reservation after so many years of extension of reservation to SC/STs? Because at the time of Independence SC/STs were priority as a group. The same logic ia evident in CAA. Even brilliant lawyers are acting fool!

[@warriorwarrior9095]

Why supreme court taking so long time to prove this act (caa)is unconstitutional and boycott it.why supreme court not using its power on government

[@megsarna7429]

supreme court is now Rss Bjp court. it wont give any Justice now.

[@rosedi2255]

Supreme Court is not supreme anymore. It has been undermined by the current regime just like all other institutions. If they do not get defeated and trashed in the next elections, then god forbid what will happen to this country.

[@Oshin_Life]

According to Justice Arun Mishra, Mudiji is a versatile global genius

[@kumarh7178]

@@rosedi2255 * I totally agree to your point of view

[@kumarh7178]

@@Oshin_Life * Arun Mishra has money ,he can afford to leave the country.

[@mdsk4713]

Abhinav chanderchur great man in India ❤

[@chagal3299]

So the history of citizenship in India was not very secular...Sharjeel Imam said something similar, interestingly.

[@Jeevanmn]

Sharjeel bahut padha hai, par uska 2-3ideas radical the.

[@matsji]

@@Jeevanmn people who are radical, should be treated legally

[@ark2380]

@@matsji that applies to a majority of indian population I guess!

[@sliderBro]

But partition of India was also not secular.

[@AshManJoshi]

I cant believe, chicken neck todne wale idiot ka naam aap educated logon me lena chahate ho... He is a shame for his community and for India. Aise jaheelonko stage dene ki himmat koi desh ke prati imandaar vyakti kaise kar sakta hai.

[@avibcci1297]

Well giving citizenships to muslims of neighbouring islamic countries will only bring national security threat to India. God keep your liberal values to yourself.

[@arshifatimarrr7376]

How intellectual he is. Allah bless u bro.!!!

[@arvind9405]

I don't support NRC Full support to CAA, while we discuss about Illegal Immigrant was Atheist or some other religion Minorities in Bangladesh came to 8% from 30% Minorities in Pakistan came to 4% from 24% Minorities in Afganistan is 0.5% Common thing in these countries are 1) Islam is State religion 2) Only Muslim should become PM 3) People who criticize Islam will be hanged 4) A lot number of Buddhist shrine, Temple, Church, Gurudwara is burned 5) In Pakistan 56 Christian kids were killed in bomb attack And manymore

[@VivekKumar-py8nd]

First of all Indian constitution is secular only by its name. Indian constitution talks about only minority but not majority. Indian constitution ensure protection of minorities but when it's come majority, u protection is upon u. Indian constitution offer fund for minorities but not majority. Minorities in India can establish and teach religious text whereas it restrict majority and the bizzare thing is That Indian constitution doesn't define who is minority and is majority

[@soudipsanyal]

Great argument. It baffles me who in our government is taking these decisions?

[@Ronnien]

This should be shared far and wide. Explained so well.

[@oneness8648]

Think twice at the very least before suggesting what you did, Sir

[@anirbankar626]

@@oneness8648 think thrice yourself first. SIR.

[@oneness8648]

@@anirbankar626 Read my main comments and then THINK. After that if you have any questions, then only ask. Now start scrolling from the top.

[@anirbankar626]

@@oneness8648 I don't have this much free time like yours to find some stranger's comment in youtube. Say what you have to say otherwise gtfo

[@oneness8648]

@@anirbankar626 Likewise 😂🤣

[@leejoseph9907]

Brilliant young man, hats off.

[@pragasamramaswamy1592]

commendable and well articulated speech. what a clarity! great.

[@JT_India]

India could sign the1951refugee convention and make policies to grant asylum to persecuted people based on merit and circumstances without discreminatory provision of any kind OR a time limit. That would negate the need for CAA

[@muhammedsharifansari1173]

Amazing wonderful speech ❣️👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@dsbdsb6637]

All Humanitarian concerns must be extracted from various possible 'exceptions' & religious Identities must be avoided to win the title of Secular Humanitarian, the lesson i learned by watching this.

[@abhijeetmandal3822]

This Young Advocate is giving an impression that India's secularism was compromised right from the time of partition but India became Secular 3 Decades later in its 42nd Amendment. So bad he deceived so many people , correct me if i am wrong.

[@suhaibroomy]

Abhijeet Mandal you are wrong. The indian constitution has secularism in its ethos, it gave equal rights to people of all religions and freedom to practice their religion freely in the country. Three decades later, the preamble of our constitution was amended to add the word secularism as it was implied by the ethos of our constitution, the whole constitution was not changed

[@bibhudatta7697]

Yes u r right..if constitution was so secular what was the need to amend its preamble in 1976? Does any 1 know how it was put in preamble? Any discussion in LS n RS was done? This nation is secular not bcoz every1 pretends to be so, but bcoz its original habitants r tolerant..when this tolerance limit crossed and we show dissent then all hell falls apart..this advocate so cleverly says caa is unconstitutional..is he aware of situations that compelled the govt to come with caa..has India taken contract of allowing every1 for citizenship?.which country in this world allows citizenship easily?

[@DanishAli-gw9ke]

The fundamental duties were added to the constitution around the same time the word 'secular' was. Should we denounce that too?

[@abhijeetmandal3822]

@@suhaibroomy Thanks Suhaib for this input that's exactly i was hoping for.

[@abhijeetmandal3822]

@@bibhudatta7697 Sorry Bibhu , I too have lots of questions but i might disagree on some of your points as i see it, Secularism is the only way in this 21st century India towards healthy Democracy which leads to growth and prosperity of a Nation. on the other hand History has shown again and again communism based on race or religion might be beneficial in short terms but devastating in long terms. I think i got my question answered by @Suhaib Roomy: Secularism is just a word , it's essence was already captured but i am glad 3 decades later the word Secularism was added so we all know what to stand by at the time of crisis.

[@jworld1785]

The entire partition was incorrect and unfair. The CAA law is just as Pakistan doesn't believe in secularism and has formed an Islamic state as opposed to India. So Hindus, Sikhs should get citizenship in India. Ask Pakistan to stop persecuting other religions and become a secular state. CAA is justice

[@sambs3609]

What an amazing speech..... you spoke the words that I have in my mind.

[@RSJ8102]

His father Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud - Supreme Court judge and soon going to be Chief Justice of India. His Grandfather Justice Yeshwant Chandrachud Longest serving chief justice of India (approx 7 yrs) He is surely following his ancestors legendary footsteps

[@afshababa6941]

Oh my god so deep and very true.

[@indianproud8535]

salute you sir for giving knowledge on caa.

[@SciTecKnow]

Is Abhinav Chandrachud have any family relationship with The Judge of Supreme Court, Justice D Y Chandrachud. Supreme Court is the best example of Nepotism. More than 70% judges are appointed based on nepotism, this is said in an article in a English newspaper

[@vermaakash1997]

DY Chandrachud will be CJI in November 2022. He is the sun of YV Chandrachud, the longest serving CJI of India

[@shubhamjagtap108]

Focus on his points rather...

[@inshuziastic]

Isko Samajhne ke liye kuch ko firse admission lena padega 😄😄😄. This is how a Genuine Educated person speaks. Great knowledge

[@inshuziastic]

@@ItsMeVikramVerma Chalo ek toh aya admission lene ki zarurat hai tumko comment karke bata dia.. 😄😄😄🤣🤣🤣

[@inshuziastic]

@@ItsMeVikramVerma Naam toh Gawar kardo gangwar ke layak nahi ho.. Gulami kar rahe ho wahi karo 😄😄

[@prerana1765]

damn his dad is the future cji of india and his grandad, longest serving cji of india!

[@grv_agni]

@Shubham Johri I second that. Easy to fool anyone with non-law background with a "compelling argument". Numerous objections can be raised on his premise and methodology itself. Forget the stupid super structure of arguments and story he builds upon giving it a totally different color.

[@DT-eg4ip]

@Shubham Johri yes. India is not responsible or accountable to everyone except for India.

[@sukeerthda814]

@Shubham Johri am concurring with your argument sir. Also out of curiosity, do u also feel that the collegium might appoint him to supreme court if he has a Phd, in the eminent jurist category. I got a very strong feeling on that. Since the collegium passionately quashed NJAC anything is possible. His grandad, his dad, now him. What say bro n also look at the poor knowledge of history. Probably for him balkanisation was better option. Just implying

[@RahulKumar-ng2gh]

@@sukeerthda814 yup, one of our teachers is a supreme court lawyer at a UPSC coaching institute, he came to teach us polity on weekends, he told us in class that judiciary is the most nepotistic institution in India run by around 400 families, even some of my frnds are doing LLB from DU, he corroborated with this fact. Another frnd a son of hc judge told us that it's so much corrupt that even a job of MTS in a court can't be filled withoutbribing someone in the upper echelon of judicial system.

[@neil8173]

Instead of just asserting existence of weakness in his arguments, could y'all actually point out the legal flaws?

[@rocknroll9918]

I have never heard such a cogent and eloquent case made regarding CAA!!! Bravo! The only regret is why he was interrupted and asked to conclude in such haste:((

[@murox007]

Carbon copy of Dr. DY. 3rd Gen Brilliance.

[@talhadudeful]

Is he son of dr. dy chandrachur ?

[@pauling9895]

@@talhadudeful Yes.

[@SasankIyer]

What a brilliant, ingenious rhetoric. Beautiful.

[@amritadouglas5994]

Mistake- if CAA cutoff is based on the date of arrival it does not discriminate against foreign birth. The rest of his objections regarding overly narrow parameters doesn't hold water because no such migrations have occurred by the end of 2014.

[@khalidrahman8251]

What is the source of your facts? Please reveal or else do not misguide the masses.

[@lakshmiprashanth7591]

Sir you have really given good detail about 1947 and 1948. But India cannot take for all those who do not have their own country

[@DeepakPal-ru7zo]

For Hindus also, i think Nepal is there...

[@faiser83]

Nepal has declared itself as a secular state, previously it was a Hindu state

[@proudindian9140]

@Everybody Nobody talk as much u can....u will not be given any chance later

[@RamaKrishna-gx6oo]

@@proudindian9140 The above video is biased and even not worthy to comment .. He talks about persians but ask him to answer where are all the persians gone from Iran ?

[@RamaKrishna-gx6oo]

@Felicity Ribeiro Islamization of persian has taken place in 10th and 11 th century with conquest of muslim and name has been changed to iran ....We know what this channel and guys here chanting about ...Its not a neutral view ...he is carrying his own agenda ..

[@faiser83]

@@RamaKrishna-gx6oo brother let's talk about peace in 21st century...we are not living in 11th century anymore...

[@arvind9405]

Instead of pointing out small error in CAA why don't some one call for solution In Bangladesh Minority is reduced to 30% in 1951 to 8% in 2020 In Pakistan from 24% in 1951 to 4% in 2020 In Afganistan only 0.5 % Minority live 👆 Even Congress accept all these facts

[@s.v.hussain435]

Nothing will work to the dead bakhts. Very excellent lecture heard after many years.

[@proudindian9140]

The reality is we hate u....accept it leave india and let hindus live a better life...pak is waiting for u with open arms

[@jatintjoseph4659]

@@proudindian9140 your hate will kill you.

[@cenexcise]

@@proudindian9140 I really feel pity for you. Hatred is a disease. Get well soon.

[@proudindian9140]

@@cenexcise Sickular...get well soon....but that's least expected from u coz y lick raveesh,kamra and rathee so expected from u....so FO.

[@proudindian9140]

@@jatintjoseph4659srf u converted junk

[@Geetavish]

If Abhinav Chandrachud want to reward the very people who under Muslim League voted for the creation of Islamic Pakistan by giving them citizenship I have an advise for him. India of the 21st century is not the same India. It will no longer tolerate abuse of Sanatana Dharma followers. We don’t like nepotism under any circumstances.

[@skasti]

Why I am not able to think like that you all so good

[@ayashkantdeo8545]

These types of thinking comes from knowledge.

[@skasti]

@@ayashkantdeo8545 right

[@Jeevanmn]

Be attentive and start reading. KZbin kills brain cells.

[@isabelladcunha8911]

Beautifully portrayed

[@SadiqAliSheikh21]

you need more knowledge to analyse.. more books more thoughts to analyse

[@Dam6404]

Its 2024 march.. CAA implemented but u are still here because u r NOT an ANDHBHAKT

[@yashvaryamehta612]

You think....they have any jews left in Pakistan 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@ravindrazore8539]

If he thinks CAA is unconstitutional then let him fight it in supreme court

[@shaikharfat7507]

He explained CAA in simple terms.... May God bless you brother..💓💓

[@animeshmondal761]

He is son of DY CHANDRACHUR, CJI

[@mesinjana]

This is a great speech unearthing the problems with CAA in itself. Learnt a lot of things. Wonder why our opposition leaders empowered by so many advisors couldn't come up with anything as closely articulate as this in the Parliament both the ls and rs.

[@Humanity1st]

#Satyan can I have the permission to download and upload it my channel and other social medium as well coz that's in dept reality of CAA the nation needs to know🙏

[@tavimala]

He did cleverly deliver his speech by his intellectual knowledge to have support anti CAA stand... may some other person have many counyters on basisi of IPC as well as humanity. Over years of seeing riots why do we need to be secular (actually it only introduced by Indira Ghandi for a mere votebank...) If any one agree just like...

[@baitalik]

An enlightened lecture from a young man who understands our constitution much better than so called pundits. Thanks for posting.

[@gplayj7178]

Thank you so much for posting 🙏

[@aloksen626]

Very nuanced criticism, for a broad spectrum law. And transgender is not a religious minority. Government doesn't intend to save all the Hindus,Sikhs of the world. Partition was not a Secular exercise. This law is intended for those people who didn't vote for Jinnah, yet are forced to pay the consequences.

[@bhanuparashar6911]

By his logic Uniform Civil Code should be established, let's give up CAA and bring UCC!

[@chetaliarts4981]

Well said....

[@subhasistudu1025]

Bhanu Parashar it's your opinion. Thank you .

[@ToreroDiablo]

Lets give up hajj subsidy, reservations to other minorities, reservations to women, reservations to OBC etc.. Why differentiate?

[@vidyasagarsingh57]

If govt of India follow his words and give citizen to all about whom he talk Population of india will jump to 200 crores within a year..... अतिथि देवो भबः Edited:- And yes...there is a lot of loophole in our constitution as he said... The whole world is fighting for his own race...india shouldn't... प्राण जाए पर बचन न जाए,,,, The same thing we are doing for centuries.............कन्धार.....तक्षशिला.....रंगून............मत्स्य(मलेशिया).....

[@dhirajk5457]

This law is not really intended to give citizenship to religious persecuted minorities but to distract people from the main problem of our country, to be really honest , immigrants and immigration is not really our problem but economy employment infrastructure is but government dont want to talk about it, we should not allow anyone no matter from any religion to our country as we are lack in facilities and we have other things to focus on. #myopinion

[@amitpatilamit]

You know CAA is actually makes getting citizenship EASIER for a lot of people, right?