History of Hungary in 2.5 minutes

History of Hungary in 2.5 minutes | Timeline

Рет қаралды 2,834

Жыл бұрын

Having appeared in Eastern Europe, the Hungarians formed their own state, which changed the balance of power in the region.

Пікірлер: 27

@user-cq5sn5hq4m Жыл бұрын

It's like "no speaking ASMR" for history lovers! Great format. Thanks a lot. Keep up and continuing the good job! Much success

@kurdistanindependance5471 5 ай бұрын

Speaking is better than

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

Great summary and animation

@Short_History Жыл бұрын

Thanks

@user-ku9pr7kr5n Жыл бұрын

Формат интересный, но, как по мне, скучноватый. Просто смотреть на меняющиеся границы государств и читать краткие всплывающие пояснения в углу, честно сказать, не очень интересно. Куда бы лучше было, если бы вы вместе скооперировались и запилили какой-нибудь полноценный большой ролик на общую тему. В пример, хотя и не очень подходящий вроде (просто ничего больше в голову не пришло, кроме Мудреныча и пары его видосов), могу привести историю ГДР на канале Вестник Бури. Там как раз пример такой кооперации. Но хотя решать все равно вам, а это лишь мое субъективное мнение) И удачи в развитии канала, конечно, тебе и Понятной Истории)

@Short_History Жыл бұрын

Формат будет совершенствоваться это лишь первое видео в таком формате.

@user-co8mk1px4j Жыл бұрын

Интересный эксперимент 💥

@user-vx9ns5bg6m Жыл бұрын

С возвращением)

@markocroatia7630 Жыл бұрын

1:29 You ignored Croat Josip Jelacic...

@user-hl7dg6do5n Жыл бұрын

Очень круто 👍👍👍👍👍. Так держать

@user-or8ev4rn2i Жыл бұрын

В конце ролика Венгрия закончилась?

@attilaistenostora Жыл бұрын

Scythian -> Hun -> Avar -> Hungarian

@seeeyuuu Жыл бұрын

Hungars is not scythian or hun hunns - mongols/türks scythians - tajiks and persians

@attilaistenostora Жыл бұрын

@@seeeyuuu The Hungarians have a deep-rooted Hungarian-Hun tradition. Until the middle of the 19th century, it was generally accepted that Hungarians were kinsfolk of the Huns and Scythians, besides Árpád, Grand Prince of the Hungarians was a direct descendant of the great Hun leader Attila. Hun-Hungarian affinity was declared in Hungarian and foreign written medieval sources and has been maintained in Hungarian folk memory. All of the old Hungarian medieval chronicles say “The Hungarians came from Scythia” and “The Scythians and the Huns are the ancestors of the Hungarians”. These medieval chronicles were written only for the King about the deeds of his own family and not for the folk. The authors did not lie for the King about his family, the chronicles also contain many negative things about the royal family. I also think the kings knew the history of their families before these chronicles were written because the royal court has storytellers. These chronicles were not written for million of print to use as propaganda to the peoples The Chronicum Pictum (1300s) says: "primus ingressus" = “first incoming” = Attila, "secundus ingressus" = “second incoming” = Arpad All old Hungarian chronicle Gesta Hungarorum (1200s), Chronicum Pictum (1300s) etc say we are Scythians, Huns, Avars. same traditions, faith world (Turul, Deer) fight style etc Hungarians have the oldest Attila depiction etc kzbin.info/www/bejne/o4eWp2aoq7WFnKc

@benceszunyi Жыл бұрын

@@attilaistenostora This is a fake theory like the Daco-Roman continuity theory. "Until the middle of the 19th century, it was generally accepted" Until the Early Middle Ages, the flat world conception was accepted... These chronicles were written 1200-1300 while the Hungarian migration was in the 9th century and the Hunnic empire existed in the 4-5th century, the sources of the chronicles are unknown but the language clearly shows the Finno-Ugric origin. There is very few information about the old Hungarian faith world and traditions, but the old Hungarians have a common history with Turkic tribes because they lived close to each other and in the early 9th century the Hungarian tribes settled down in the Khazar Khaganate. And that video is bullshit which was made by a propaganda institution full of far-right "historians" and funded by the Orbán government.

@attilaistenostora Жыл бұрын

@@benceszunyi "Magyarságkutató Intézet" (the video channel) is Archaeogenetic institue in Hungary. The finno ugric theory is 19th c Habsburg lie to assimilate Hungarians. Do not forget the Archeogenetics either. This new branch of science shows the ties between the Hungarians and the Scythians and Huns. In the last years the theory of the Hungarians origin from hunter-gatherer primitive Northern tribes was seriously questioned by the Archeogenetical researches (Endre Neparáczki, Tibor Török, etc.) who took genetical samples from the bones of the Hungarian conquerors from the 9-10th centuries, found in the ancient Hungarian graves excavated by the archeologists. This showed that the ruling dinasty of the Hungarians, the Árpád's ancestors came from Bactria (Central-Asian region, now in Afghanistan-Tadjikistan), while the majority of the people is ralated with the Scythians and Asian Huns, the latter, after the Chinese defeated them in 48 AD, migrated Northwards, in the region which later became Magna Hungaria. These researches appeared in prestigious international scientific magazines of Genetics. So the genetics show that the Hungarians are the descendants of the Scythians and the Huns. Nobody knows what language the Huns spoke. Some say that they spoke Turkic, but because of no written Hunnic text exist, nobody could proove this. But lately some researchers started to research the old Hunnic words preserved in the ancient Chinese texts, and they discovered that the majority of the words have ties with the Hungarian, while the reminder with the Mongolian language. So it is probable that the Huns had two components: a Western and an Eastern. The Western are most likely the ancesters of the Hungarians, while the Eastern are the ancestors of the Mongolians. The people so called two Ugor tribes (Hanti, Manshi) from Western Siberia have words for horse, or harness, which cannot exist in the vocabulary of wood-dwelling hunter-gatherer people, who do not saw any horses, maybe reindeers. The mythology of the Hanti and Manshi also speak about horse riding Gods, which show their origins from the steppe region. So these things show that originally the ancestors of these people who have the closest language to Hungarian, lived in the steppes as nomadic people, but they wrer pushed in the tundra by other people, and they had to live there, and change their life style from nomadic to hunter-gatherer. But they keeped in their language and mythology traces of their nomadic past. So they probably were part of the Hunnic tribes together with the ancestors of the Hungarians, at some point they split from our ancestors and started to live in Siberia, while our ancestors moved to the land called by Julianus Magna Hungaria (today Bashkiria and Tatarstan), from where the Huns started their conquest of Europe in the 360-370's. Until then the ancestors of the Hungarians lived together with the other Huns in that region Bashkiria-Magna Hungaria. Then in 360-370's the Huns started their conquest of Europe. The archeogenetical results of the Huns if Attila from Central Europe, which are very few, but from those few bones they could not find direct genetic continuity of the Huns with the ancestors of the Hungarians (which have powerful genetic ties with the Asian Huns and Scythians). The lack of genetic lineage with Attila's Huns are maybe because of the few truely Hunic bones found, and if more would be found, maybe the genetical continuity too could be shown between them. But if, based on this, we say that the Hungarians have no genetical continuity with Attila's Hunss this may say that our ancestors did not went to Central Europe with the Huns of Attila, but remained in Bashkiria. So the ancestors of the Hungarians (still parts of the Hunnic tribes) remained in Magna Hungaria, as keepers of the Eastern territories of the Huns, and moved towards Hungary in the 700-800's (the new researches made by Attila Türk say that they moved from there only shorthly before they entered the Carpathian Basin in 895, and they did not stood long time in Levédia and Etelköz). So the new archeogenetical researches show that the Hungarians are related to the Scythians and Huns and their ancestors were not hunter-getherers from the Northern woods, they only lived in the vicinity of that area after 48 AD until the 700-800's. The Hungarian legends and chronicles about our origins also say that we are the Huns descendents. And legends do not lie, like the genetics do not lie either... Other important tie with the Huns is the horse burials. Researchers like Miklós Érdy, Miklós Makoldy say that the Hungarians from the period of the conquest (9-10th centuries) buried their dead in a way which is almost without parallels. Only the Huns buried their deads in the same way! No other nomadic nations or tribes! So only the Hungarians and the Huns buried their deads only with the skull and the leg bones of the horse, while the other historical nomadic people (Turks, Mongolians, Avars, Pechenegs, Khazars, etc.) buried the whole horse with the dead, so the whole horse can be found in their graves, while in the Hungarian and Hunic graves only the skull and the leg bones. This is an irrefutable proof that the Hungarians are the descendants of the Huns! So the Hungarian legends that we are the same people as the Huns tell the truth! kzbin.info/www/bejne/o4eWp2aoq7WFnKc kzbin.info/www/bejne/foTahItrmc5or8k kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3a8lKSFhq6Zq7s

@benceszunyi Жыл бұрын

@@attilaistenostora No, it isn't. The Hungarian Academy of sciences accepts the Finno-Ugric origin and fortunately, the majority of Hungarians accept it as well.