I have used his quotes in so many videos and this is the first time I've seen what Hugh Kennedy even looks like.
@masahibbhatti4088 Жыл бұрын
Honestly, western historians have become less biased now. The great man history is out of the picture it seems
@johnoparinde26827 ай бұрын
Thank you for introducing me to his work
@liammacneil56726 ай бұрын
You’re a paid propaganda channel
@AlMuqaddimahYT6 ай бұрын
@@liammacneil5672 I wish. No one is paying me.
@IpsissimusPrime Жыл бұрын
This just popped up! Amazing to find a lecture of this caliber available for free. Haven’t listened yet but know the lecturer! Fabulous. Thanks!
@notanemoprog Жыл бұрын
Very very interesting series of lectures! Thank you for sharing
@podrobgob Жыл бұрын
This was a superb lecture.
@helken48253 жыл бұрын
Such an amazing lecture. Thank you sir.
@abuukarata96536 ай бұрын
Very good lecture
@justworship05703 жыл бұрын
salam from Dagestan 🙏
@abd-ar-rahmaniii56503 жыл бұрын
You mean Russia?
@Makrania3 жыл бұрын
Здравствуйте
@AbdulKhader-7864 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@kinggreen3693 жыл бұрын
Very good in detail really appreciate my gratitude to Prof sir
@timtom95035 ай бұрын
A statistician would most definitely not call 52:40 that a bell curve! It's an exponential function :)
@justworship05703 жыл бұрын
thx a lot sir
@stevenv6463 Жыл бұрын
Interesting lecture. Thanks for making it available. The professor mentions Arabic inscriptions from the Umayyad period found in Beit Shean which is now occupied by Israel. I visited and of course, they don't talk about this at all. They even have signs that say that there were earthquakes in the 500s or 600s and the place became mostly uninhabited. I found tons of examples of the erasing and ignoring of the Arab, Muslim and Palestinian history.
@skepsislamica Жыл бұрын
Your welcome
@ScrapironRyann4 жыл бұрын
Great lecture thanks very much for posting, what’s the word the professor is using, sounds like Serbica? The hereditary pension law, that Muslims receive more money if they converted earlier, I’ve tried google and using the subtitles but nothing is coming up
@landwarrior3484 жыл бұрын
He is using word أسبقية or if you cant read arabic its 'Sabakat'. It means one having precedence over another.
@ScrapironRyann4 жыл бұрын
@@landwarrior348 Excellent thanks for the info
@abuukarata96536 ай бұрын
Is true, they received much.
@abdulrashidshaikh21363 жыл бұрын
The bow is quite distracting though
@imgguru12773 жыл бұрын
Crooked too
@a.e.m.14522 жыл бұрын
8:40
@معتصمالجحدلي4 жыл бұрын
العرب شجعان اقامو اكبر امبراطرويه
@abd-ar-rahmaniii56503 жыл бұрын
مسلمين
@ArabianRazumZar3 жыл бұрын
@@abd-ar-rahmaniii5650 عرب
@abd-ar-rahmaniii56503 жыл бұрын
@@ArabianRazumZar بلا إسلام عرب ما كأنو شيءٍ
@abd-ar-rahmaniii56503 жыл бұрын
@@ArabianRazumZar الخلافة كانت دولة اسلامية
@ArabianRazumZar3 жыл бұрын
@@abd-ar-rahmaniii5650 كانت عندهم حضاره و كرامه اذا انت ما تعرف مهي مشكلتي
@Roofhack5 ай бұрын
Any serious Islamic history does not come from Islamic sources. The Umayyads were sectarian Christian, not Islamic. There is absolutely no record of Islam or Muslims during that period. The fact that this guy calls himself a "historian" is laughable.
@abuzuhm5 ай бұрын
google "historiography early islam"
@Roofhack5 ай бұрын
@@abuzuhm Yep, and no serious information of it came from the time of Mohammad. For the first hundred years there was no historical record of armies of Islam or Hordes of Muslims. Nothing. Instead the Umayyads have crosses on their coins.
@abuzuhm4 ай бұрын
@@Roofhack No, what I'm saying is that any basic research proves you wrong.
@malinyamato22914 ай бұрын
agree, he is a pro islamist who provide no proofs.
@malinyamato22914 ай бұрын
@@abuzuhm you provide no facts... why were not the name Mohammed or Meca mentioned during Umayyads or earlier?
@delavagavaga75402 жыл бұрын
Respected Professor, you are missing major points. (Ali) killed many of Umayyad’s family members in battle while the prophet was still alive. Ali was hated beyond measure. Hence, when abu sufyan son muwayaa took power, he had a personal vendetta against Ali. Proof, all the battles and civil wars in his time. Uthmans death had little to do with muwayaa vs Ali.
@shah-jahan1982 жыл бұрын
you wrong man. 😂
@Ufor332 Жыл бұрын
Load of crap
@Zulfiqar32 Жыл бұрын
@Baang E Dara These are all later fabrications to re-habilitate Muawiyah. There was a clear animosity by the Ummayads and Uthamids toward Imam Ali(as). From Muawiyah, to Ayesha to Talha & Zubair.
@Zulfiqar32 Жыл бұрын
@Baang E Dara Sound argument.
@Zulfiqar32 Жыл бұрын
All valid - Readers are urged to read "Opposing the Imam" by Nebil Husayn and "Succession to Muhammad" by Wilfred Madelung.
@juslostone Жыл бұрын
What's fascinating The Ummayah showed up with pages of the Quran to confront Ali. These dudes had Quran before Ali!
@malinyamato22914 ай бұрын
why did umayyad put christian crosses on their coins?
@malinyamato22914 ай бұрын
what a contraditictive and silly statement: -- the tex on the dome of the rock is quoranic but nothing from the Quoran -- what makes it quoranic? No proofs or examples! He has no clue about it.