"There was this one viking called 'Child-lover'..." Oh shit "because he refused to kill babies." Oh, whew. Also, 13:49 Good image.
@jasoncarto8 жыл бұрын
+Grindstone Because sexual acts of any kind are far worse than horrific torture and killing. We are a horrendous species.
@grindstone49108 жыл бұрын
***** Pretty awesome, huh?
@OttoVonGarfield7 жыл бұрын
I love bait n' switch comedy
@annamelissa6077 жыл бұрын
i thought that viking was a pedo.....
@richardroberson25647 жыл бұрын
Mount and blade
@MsAnimelady5 жыл бұрын
OK, so you did this one in 2016. But the series is almost over now. Would you be willing to do one recapping the entire series?
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
He said he probably will after it wraps up completely with S06b
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
Bárnel Mercedes The show never pretended to be 100% accurate, Hirst was saying it from before S01 even aired.
@Shelly-lz9tm4 жыл бұрын
They better be doing more seasons....haha
@patrickmcglonejr81634 жыл бұрын
Yes plz
@Bassmasterwitacaster4 жыл бұрын
When I was little I jammed poo poo down my PP and its been closed shut since
@brendan98685 жыл бұрын
Norsemen didn’t really “discover” Iceland as Irish priests had been living there previously. Also Norsemen weren’t illiterate. They carved Runes, they just didn’t write on parchment.
@Henrik_Holst5 жыл бұрын
This exactly, mostly runes where carved on wood which is why they have those sharp lines. And the very fact that they even changed from the elder to the younger futhark around year 800 when the rest of the Europeans had changed to the latin alphabet tells that the written language meant something to the Vikings.
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
They did this correctly in the show though. Floki found that cross in the cave, indicating Christians got there before him.
@torrace124 жыл бұрын
strange that he missed that vikings had a very accurate written down history with lots and lots of storys about so many things i cand list them out here bet they are very accurate ive read a lot of them
@firstname40974 жыл бұрын
also he did call vikings a society, although it was a profession, so I suppose the term for them would be Norsemen
@evillimey69654 жыл бұрын
@@torrace12 I thought all the sources from that period came from other cultures, like Saxons and Frank's.....etc, as the Norse had an oral tradition, the norse sagas are not very accurate or reliable as they were wrote a few hundred years after.
@Gurzbujar7 жыл бұрын
The Icelandic sagas are quiet complex poems, which means that if you tell it wrong, then the poetic structure and rules would not add up. That way a story could be retold over and over without really changing.
@Trailerglotzer6 жыл бұрын
Which may explain why they loved poetry so much. Clever folks.
@ryanboggs86856 жыл бұрын
Oral history can be quite accurate. It was a big deal to memorize it perfectly and recite it perfectly. Native American stories have only recently been written down, but the remembering and retelling of those stories were sacred.
@bfure16 жыл бұрын
@@ryanboggs8685 It annoys me that he equates oral tradition with simple stories. Not just anybody was allowed to tell the history in these societies. You had to learn the story from an elder and prove that you could repeat it perfectly before you were seen as worthy of repeating it to the masses. The idea that something so important to a group of people as their history and ancestors would be treated the same as a children's game is pretty insulting.
@abhijeetdave335 жыл бұрын
@@bfure1 you can be trained as much as humanly possible, but at the end of the day, we are still human, and we have imperfect brains. Then we can add on how we like to over embellish and romantacize the stories and people we love, and demonize the "villains", whether it be native Americans,Hindus, Vikings, pagans, what have you.
@your_belief_vs_everything5 жыл бұрын
Dude clearly discounts the viking culture as illiterate therefore his depiction of the Sagas makes them appear like fairy tales. Insulting.
@OCRay16 жыл бұрын
Travis Fimmel’s portrayal of Ragnar Lothbrok is one of my all time favorite characters. He was awesome! It would be pretty cool though to see Leif Erickson brought into the fold and open a whole new era of the show. Since Ragnar died I have lost a lot of interest in the show and that could really revive it. The casting of Leif though would have to be as perfect as it was with Ragnar to pull it off
@stephanreichelt19602 жыл бұрын
Leif is in Vikings Vallhala
@franciszaldivar3372 жыл бұрын
@@stephanreichelt1960 yeah and they take waaaaaaay too many liberties with him (even more so than what they did with Ragnar), nicknaming him "Leif the Lucky" after the Battle of London Bridge (1014) (which he was never at) when in reality he got the nickname because he discovered what is now present day Newfoundland, Canada
@stephanreichelt19602 жыл бұрын
@@franciszaldivar337 that's Hollywood for you...
@franciszaldivar3372 жыл бұрын
@@stephanreichelt1960 yeah I mean considering what they did also with Jarl "Hakon" that's just adding modern identity politics, not to say there weren't people of mixed heritage, but the fact that many are that accepting is just ignoring history for the sake of "diversity" and "representation" (the KZbinr Metatron does a much better explanation than I can here about why it's problematic)
@stephanreichelt19602 жыл бұрын
@@franciszaldivar337 same with the tattoos; seems like every character has plenty and modern day quality too
@Hipst3rMax5 жыл бұрын
The whole point is that they condensed the story of Ragnar's sons in the Icelandic sagas into a drama. They did a bleeding great job.
@rodolforamirorivera4 жыл бұрын
That’s
@Bassmasterwitacaster4 жыл бұрын
You are a gay boy
@ronpaulssecretary4 жыл бұрын
The tale of ragnar lothbrok isn't very long though? They did the exact opposite of condensing it. They expanded it and added ragnar to historical events he wasn't at. I don't think you know what the word "condense" means. If they actually condensed the story, it'd barely be 1 season. Ragnar marries thora, has his first 2 kids, she gets sick, he marries kraka, has more kids, his kids go raid shit that has never been raided before. The end. It'd be a very short show.
@muffinman57418 жыл бұрын
"Hey guys let's not brutally butcher newborns..." "....ha....haha...HAHHAHAHAHAHAH" just viking things
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
“What a pussy”
@heehoohehehe12674 жыл бұрын
"simp"
@kelrogers84803 жыл бұрын
We laugh, but Oz, NZ and the US have just made full term and during birth abortion fully legal, and basically on demand. In the case of the twelve percent of late term abortions where the babies are accidentally born alive, the infants are not allowed to be rescued. They are left to die. Both Biden and Obama voted for this. So we may laugh at the Vikings, but what we do as modern humans is far, far worse!
@vysharra3 жыл бұрын
@@kelrogers8480 literally none of that is true. It’s also completely irrelevant to this video. Go take your politics somewhere else
@kelrogers84803 жыл бұрын
@@vysharra Oh, so nasty Kitty. And so intelligent of you, lol. Let me school you in some basics, dearie: It's my right to share my politics and my opinions when and where I want to. You have the right to disagree. If you don't like that, then YOU be the one to take yourself elsewhere. Hateful individual!
@CaptainHaddocck8 жыл бұрын
there are no mountains in Denmark, the highest is around 140 m.
@Stale_Mahoney8 жыл бұрын
what is your point? or lack of pointy hills xD
@mikaelbergstrom84198 жыл бұрын
I can answer this. The home of Ragnar is supposed to be by the sea of Kattegat, they mention this several times in the series. But there is no mountains or fjords in that area. That sea is between todays Sweden and Denmark and its all flatlands. But in the show there are huge mountains and fjords...
@DoDaDaDaDaCaDa8 жыл бұрын
+Mikael Bergström Film magic
@artyom17248 жыл бұрын
Also Hedeby was in south of sleswig. It is not near Kattegat.
@MihaiRUdeRO8 жыл бұрын
Yeah the scenery is actually filmed in Western Canada lol
@russby35546 жыл бұрын
Please do Last Kingdom next. I love how in the beginning it's pretty accurate to the times and in the books the author even says what parts are real and which he took creative liberty with. Plus you were using video from Last Kingdom so I'm guessing you're probably (hopefully) entertaining the idea. Thank you for your time and keep up the amazing work!
@wongjefx9808 жыл бұрын
The Last Kingdom. The Viking's or Danes in England at the time of Alfred the Great. On Netflix.
@oliverewarthopkins78185 жыл бұрын
Yes, that would be so much yes.
@your_belief_vs_everything5 жыл бұрын
Much better than Vikings
@PokePresto5 жыл бұрын
Norsemen. A acutal good take and at the same time funny of viking life and culture compared to the bs that is last kingdom and vikings.
@boozycruze76795 жыл бұрын
that show is more historically accurate. more so than Vikings but Vikings is a much better drama.
@rhysmalavioson42605 жыл бұрын
As well as one called Redbad
@MissVasques8 жыл бұрын
Not you too, another claiming something not really true. Being a Swedish girl who have lived close to different Viking burial sites and the like, it always Bugs me when it is claimed that Vikings didn't write things down just because it wasn't on parchment. The viking Runes, learned a tad of in school as a kid here... Yes, most was on wood that had rot and became dust over time but there are still lots of Stones ingraved with viking runes. Why are these not mentioned? It was the same in that british/american viking documentary showed before one of the Viking seasons. The vikings obviously could read and write, they just didn't use it an everyday way to create books and such. But otherwise, interesting and great vid;):D
@Murf1818 жыл бұрын
I don't know if all vikings were fully literate at that time but I agree with you. The viking should have clearly identified that parchment as writing medium because that wrote as well but on wood and stone.
@derdingsreturnsnochmal51778 жыл бұрын
Wasn't it told in the Havamal that runes shouldn't be used lightheaded. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think norsemen believed them to be magical, some sort of gift from the gods and where used for religious purposes only. So apart from Gothis, norsemen where analphabets.
@omarsig98148 жыл бұрын
Im from Iceland and I can inform you that we did write on Papyrus around 1100 A.C At least, if you come to Iceland and to Reykjavik you can go to Arnastofnun 100meter away from Nordic House you can actually see these old books, but if not then I know a guy who actually is as a quardian over the books and I can help you to see them, but not all of theme, most of the books are kept in a safe place in a right temperature and I think in a basement under the foundationhouse called after a man who had this name : Arni, we fleed the king Haraldur around 850 or near 900 and made our own colony and we later discovered Land we called Greenland, the name of that viking was Eirikur the red because he had red hair, his son went to the west and found a land called Vineland, you call it USA, he name was Leifur the Luck, but I will not say anything more now, we have a big history and we publice many hundred books every year, we aer called the natoin of books, we read so much and educationstandard here is very high, everybody here can play chess and the children learn to talk Danish, Swedish and Norwegian and English and in after 16 year they learn French, saga of the Vikings is underestimated, still. I lived in Malmo 1989 to 1991 and that was a great time and beeing able to got to Kobenhavn several time in week was amasing, for me as a Icelandic man.
@derdingsreturnsnochmal51778 жыл бұрын
ómar Sig Euh ... well Papyrus? Not parchment? And was Iceland still pagan in 1100 or christian? And I know of Eirikur and Leifur ( I know them as Erik and Leif, but I guess that's a regional thing) and as far as I know Vinland describes New Foundland and Labrador, which are canadian.
@Hafer_8 жыл бұрын
By 1100 the viking age was already over, so I really doubt you can refer to those who wrote these books as vikings or even pagans. They were probably written by monks since most of the population of that time was illiterate
@basement-dwellingvirgin70994 жыл бұрын
I like The Last Kingdom better. Idk if it's historically accurate or if it's authentic, but I like it because the pacing and characters. The show is very fast paced, something is always happening, but somehow I never felt lost. King Alfred is my favorite character in the show.
@shadwdiamnd52914 жыл бұрын
After season 3 the show became a bit boring, but i cant wait for season 5!
@IkarusKommt3 жыл бұрын
The characters are your typical americans, with no trace of actual medieval mentality.
@rc591912 жыл бұрын
I just wish they'd use the actual shields and tactics that the actual Saxons used. Their weapons, armor, and tactics, were very similar to the Norsemen and they didn't need that dude to teach them to fight in a shield wall formation they already did.
@wargattack8837 Жыл бұрын
the last kingdom is historically accurate
@gnomecano6874 жыл бұрын
23:00 uses scenes from the last kingdom. Tryed to pull a fast one on me nick, but I see what you’re playing! Now you have to do an episode on that show
@KaladinVegapunk4 жыл бұрын
??? What do you mean? He straight up says it's from Last Kingdom hahah But yeah, same exact time period and setting but different characterization I love uthreds arc and alfred's better in LK, it's funny how different Ubba is in both
@puneetmishra47263 жыл бұрын
I personally believe TLK is better than Vikings. It is more accurate, more intriguing and more nuanced.
@itstriplem20693 жыл бұрын
@@puneetmishra4726 yeah I like more than vikings, both are good though and I like the fighting scenes in Vikimgs a bot more than TLK, but TLK is way more interesting
@tillsatt508 жыл бұрын
The name Ivar the boneless, derives from the fact that he was often so drunk that he couldnt stand on his feet.. We still use the term today where I come from. "Benlös" or "beinlös"... Ergo - boneless, when someone is really drunk and stumbling around. Well thats just my own theory :)
@arielmetamorphosis8 жыл бұрын
tillsatt50 where do you come from? Sir?
@MrBrutalicus7 жыл бұрын
tillsatt50 yea thats a good theory. 👍 i mighty have heard benlös sometimes.
@OttoVonGarfield7 жыл бұрын
Ivar the Radical, Ivar the Totally Tubular, Ivar The Skateboard Kid.
@nmarbletoe82107 жыл бұрын
How about Eystein the Fart, 8th century king of Norway? Mentalfloss website says, "The epithet “Fart” is usually taken to mean that he was a busybody or loudmouth, although no definitive explanation has yet been found."
@Gitarzan667 жыл бұрын
I must be a descendant King Eystein the Fart. In my youth I was also known as "The Boneless" In my old age I am know as "The Boneless" as well or "The Old Fart"
@srnigromante92147 жыл бұрын
King Alfred is my favorite character in The Last Kingdom, id love if you did a video about the show, i know its mostly fantasy but id love to know how faithful the historical parts are
@Hotasigva8 жыл бұрын
A couple of things you brought up is wrong. Scandinavia is far from covered in ice and snow, only during winter and thats only northern sweden/norway, we rarely have much snow in southern sweden and denmark. You spoke of it being authentic yet you did not mention the huge flaws in scenery. 1 Kattegatt didnt excist by name until 17th century(also a dutch name) and it is only a piece of water, not a town. 2 Kattegatt isnt connected to any Fjords as are shown in the series. 3 Hedeby is shown to be close and surrounded by mountains. There are no mountains in denmark, at all, nor any hills near the real location of Hedeby.
@launderedsilvrr21106 жыл бұрын
Manadiart you're responding to a year old comment...
@simongillaspie32656 жыл бұрын
Isn't Finland also part of Scandinavia?
@stephenbanks95435 жыл бұрын
Simon Gillaspie Actually not, they are considered Nordic.
@chatteyj5 жыл бұрын
I also assumed 'Vikings' was set in Norway. Where is it suppose to be set?
@kentnielsen80344 жыл бұрын
@@chatteyj denmark ,ragnar is an old danish king from the myths
@henkvanessen2908 Жыл бұрын
Another theory for Ivar's agnomen "The Boneless" was that he was very flexible and moved his way through everything during fighting
@yassir2824 Жыл бұрын
Another theory is that when ordering at Wingstop, he preferred the boneless wings to the bone-in
@vicioussteamengine7089 Жыл бұрын
Na he was LBTQ and have no Boner!
@wendyHew5 ай бұрын
Well he certainly didn't have a chariot
@cyberspinosaur11456 жыл бұрын
I watched one of your videos out of sheer curiosity, and I am HOOKED! You're incredibly knowledgeable, thorough and dedicated to your research, and you explain everything in a way that is easily understandable. I've been binge watching your videos and I'm having an absolute blast learning about all the subjects you cover, I can't get enough! Thank you for your dedication to the channel and sharing the fascinating information you've learnt with us, and I can't wait too see what you review next P.S The snakes in the pit are adorable! They're all constrictors, though, so completely harmless. Obviously they couldn't use real poisonous/venomous snakes, though it'd be funny to see him in a pit full of Western Hognoses, the most adorable non lethal venomous snake on Earth (in my humble opinion. They're tiny little sass noodles)
@Erikaaaaaaaaaaaaa8 жыл бұрын
I get irrationally excited when i see a history buffs video in my subscription box.
@HistoryBuffs8 жыл бұрын
I get the same excitement when I see comments on my videos :)
@innesfinlay89328 жыл бұрын
+History Buffs Vikings has come!!!!!! Yes. Also can I fight you in total war?
@skyleonidas92708 жыл бұрын
+Jen'Ari-Asha yup
@innesfinlay89328 жыл бұрын
+Sky Leonidas Who are you
@innesfinlay89328 жыл бұрын
+Innes Finlay Is that your steam name?
@VERTiiGOGAMING8 жыл бұрын
Would love to see you review HBO's ROME
@SultanTrk8 жыл бұрын
+VERTiiGO GAMING Verts!!
@mipoorboy14788 жыл бұрын
Omg!!!! So true!!! Please do it!!! Rome is still my fav show of all time!!!! If u want history, character driven plots, beautiful and gory fight scenes, gorgeous women and men, treachery , men and women fighting morality (the definition of morality being Roman of course) and so so so much more. Plus it has Kevin McKidd. PleAse do it!!! I'll be waiting for this!!!
@jonathanbaago53128 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@philipofmacedon44038 жыл бұрын
agree. love rome
@Don1ci1cio8 жыл бұрын
i guess he wont. sigh. i love the show rome
@SolarDragon0076 жыл бұрын
I would LOVE if History Buffs reviewed "The Last Kingdom".
@kristopherriemer48073 жыл бұрын
Please this!!! I want to hear a good analysis of that show's historical accuracy! The Alfred in it is so interesting, I hope he's at least based on his historical counterpart.
@mrhaz89393 жыл бұрын
@@kristopherriemer4807 Good news for you, The Last Kingdom are incredibly accurate on Alfred, he was considered to be a fair and just character (as shown) and was the only king to be referred to as the “great”. Even when it appears he is harsh to Uhtred, it is only because he goes by the law. He was acted superbly and it showed the impact it had on everyone once he died, showing the importance that his work would continue on. His dream of a United England was also very true, and the battles (especially in season 1) are extremely accurate, especially the one that’s at the end of the first season. Even against all odds Alfred overcame the Danes in a decisive victory.
@mrhaz89393 жыл бұрын
@@kristopherriemer4807 Also, when Uhtred was alive (the real Uhtred) he did indeed work for the Ethelred, also known as Ethelred the hopeless, because as accurately shown in the show, he had no redeeming qualities as a king. Uhtred himself does actually marry a dane and was the rightful heir of Bebenaburg. He was actually the ealdorman of North Umbria and owned lots of land all over England. Of course not everything is accurate in the show, including the timeline, however many things are surprisingly true.
@thekolchak72438 жыл бұрын
Also I'd like to point out because this annoyed me: Vikings:- Norse raiders Norse:- The ethnic group living in Scandinavia in th 8th & 9th century. Meaning that there were no 'Viking women' or Viking settlements'
@ethanruigrok79467 жыл бұрын
well, some women were viking
@katrinepetersen25666 жыл бұрын
The Kolchak Exactly! It's like if Everyone in the 'pirate era' would be called a pirate, or if we called all japanese people for yakusa. I don't know if This is entirely correct, but I Seem to remember from my school time, that most viking where looked Down upon (You know, due to making a bad reputation for scandinavian travellers)
@Trailerglotzer6 жыл бұрын
as were all men under arms back then. what do you think warparties of christian kingdoms did to restock supplies in foreign territory or to gain a little extra? Yep, they raided. And also murdered and raped in the process. That's not a heathen exclusive thing, you know?
@YABBAHEY16 жыл бұрын
Hey Davey, You have any English, Irish or German blood in ya ? They live on in you bub.
@Brickcellent6 жыл бұрын
They're all cucks now so who cares
@JakkieSinner7 жыл бұрын
This review actually got me into this show, and now its one of my favorites. So thanks for helping me get into Vikings, and also I love the reviews you do. I don't know if you will see this request but I would like to see you do a review on the 1963 film Cleopatra
@jeanwillemse26626 жыл бұрын
On the Ivar subject... They have definitely for sure found the bones of Ivar the boneless... They were massive... So it's now thought he couldn't walk because of severe giantism.
@davehoward228 жыл бұрын
you should do rome
@Williamstanway8 жыл бұрын
Rome was my favourite show ever , I love Titus and lucious.
@Caesar_Himself8 жыл бұрын
+dave h 1st season - Awesome. 2nd season - meh
@Williamstanway8 жыл бұрын
+Caesar Himself yeah the second season was to rushed due to the cancelation of the show, so the plot was shoehorned into one season, I feel it could have gone on longer, but the sets and the accuracy of that show has been hard to surpass , which is probably why it was cancelled because it cost so much . great show and I still thoroughly enjoyed the second season.
@Caesar_Himself8 жыл бұрын
William Stanway Yep. It lost its way entirely in the 2nd. Too many uninteresting new characters and odd plotlines that went nowhere. It still had its moments though. Shame there were not more battle scenes as they were very well done.
@Williamstanway8 жыл бұрын
+Caesar Himself I also think it was probably James purfoys best role he was great as Mark Anthony and has never really hit the nail with slot his other stuff, the first battle scene really drew me in, it really felt authentic.
@Palora018 жыл бұрын
Viking this, Vikings that, not everyone was a Viking, in fact most people in Scandinavia weren't Vikings, what with all the "Norse-speaking farmers, fishermen, carpenters, and cheese-makers, who spent between none and very little of their time carrying out sea raids."
@armoredp8 жыл бұрын
+Palora Correct, Viking was essentially the description of your job. But most people still think it is a nationality or ethnic description.
@atomiicpunk8 жыл бұрын
+Damir Pryce Theres some really old runestones in Sweden, where the word Viking is used, as a description of pirates.
@danishviking80028 жыл бұрын
+Palora Well I cant really agree 100% with you guys. This is the way I see it. First of all, here in Scandinavia every single person from the lands of Scandinavia in the viking age (792-1035) are considered vikings. Thats the term of a viking, at least here. Viking - Scandinavian person from between 792-1035 even if it was a farmer, a fisherman or what so ever. Well, the english language is brutally speaking made by latin and old norse. Of course not every word but many of them, fact. I have actually made a dictionary with a sh*tload of english words coming straight from Scandinavia. One of the "words" are -ing. Lots of cities and small towns around here has a name with -ing and the end, or inge. It seems to be that ing has more translations but the most certain must be that it means something like what/where you are coming from, who you are. Since im danish and I know the scandinavian words I cant see how "vik" cant mean nothing but a shore. Some shallow water, coast area. So my conclusion is that the word viking means man/men someone of the shore/ coming from the shore/sea in other words someone in his boat preparing to go on land. And its hard to believe that this has nothing to do with raids but even so viking is the term of all the Scandinavian people living in between 792-1035. Sorry for my bad english.
@atomiicpunk8 жыл бұрын
Danish Viking Here in Scandinavia, we don't consider every person who lived in Scandinavia during the Viking age, as Vikings. That's just pure missinformation.
@danishviking80028 жыл бұрын
I work at a viking museum under the danish national museum. Its not "missinformation" at all. But if you mean that the term viking doesnt mean scandinavian person between 792-1035 then what ? Then you mean that there were people that we consider people and others we consider vikings living side by side ? Thats ridiculous. I think everyone allready understands that vikings were not only raiders, but also fishermen, hunters. craftmen, farmers etc... literally everything you could be at that time. So who wasnt vikings in the viking age (792-1035) ???
@kroninn Жыл бұрын
Duke Rollo is one of my Ancestors and great grandfather of mine went with William the Conqueror to England in 1066. We are them. Remember where you come from.
@lurpakshakur22308 жыл бұрын
Lel the M&B artwork
@15andersh8 жыл бұрын
+Valdemar Gaardsted Less talk more raiding!
@MrFjordbak8 жыл бұрын
that's a nice head you have on your shoulders
@Biczeschlappe8 жыл бұрын
+Valdemar Gaardsted It's almost harvesting season!
@lurpakshakur22308 жыл бұрын
My LORD!!!!
@lourenskaufmann76398 жыл бұрын
+Valdemar Gaardsted Dead men tell no tales.
@itsmetramp8 жыл бұрын
Great work dude, I am a huge fan of vikings also and love reading the history and stories and such and this was presented perfectly! You deserve more credit :).
@Luboman4115 жыл бұрын
At 15:00. Fun fact--the predecessor to the fabulous Louvre Palace in central Paris was first built by the successors of Charles the Bald in the 900s AD to prevent Viking attacks on the city. The Louvre is placed on the narrowest approach along the Seine River leading up to the Ile de la Cite, the heart of medieval Paris. The placement of the Louvre looks northward and westward, the two directions from which Viking raids would come barreling down to Paris.
@MarekUtd8 жыл бұрын
13:49 Mount & Blade: Warband game cover.
@ilyaXshuffler8 жыл бұрын
Hey, we have to drink from skulls somehow.
@UrethraCaveDiver8 жыл бұрын
THAT'S A NOICE HEEAD YOU HAVE ON YOUR SHEWLDERS
@Aragonstar8 жыл бұрын
It's almost harvesting season!
@Potatosteam7 жыл бұрын
You better not be a manhunter.
@warwatch7 жыл бұрын
My lord !
@madeyouwatch69908 жыл бұрын
I think the show doesn't have the Vikings wearing armor because it would be hard to tell who's who
@andrewofblighty14978 жыл бұрын
+Jumping horse productions well there isn't actually much evidence from what Vikings wore, something like only one actual helmet has been found (they found a few rusted to shit ones also), and its the same with mail, even then they are dated to be from like the 900s... they did however have gambeson and leather but like leather was rare because I think it was hard to make, there was also scale armour, which was also dated in like the 900s i believe. but its recorded that Vikings did scavenge armour from battles and used that so yh.
@andrewofblighty14978 жыл бұрын
+Jumping horse productions and that from what i remember so it may not be 100% correct, however we cant actually know for sure anyway because nobody today was alive then
@prismadew8 жыл бұрын
There are a ton of helmets. Also, pretty much all art and carvings involving warriors had them all wearing pointy helmets.
@andrewofblighty14978 жыл бұрын
prismadew I did research after this, 1. There isn't a tone of helmets, there are few as I mentioned and 2. Where did you get this carvings had Viking warriors with pointy helmets ? Seeing that there is near to no Norseman carvings with helmets at all, and most if the carvings of Norseman warriors (if you do your research) actually have no helmets at all, most Norseman carvings are of their gods and just story's in runes. I'm not denying helmets existed, just saying there is extremely little evidence of them, that's why there was this horned helmet belief for so long, because they didn't have much evidence. Even the helmets they did have were obviously rare as iron itself was actually expensive during the Viking age, hence why the majority of Norseman used axes, that they would also use for wood.
@Gilmaris8 жыл бұрын
+prismadew There has only been one helmet found which dates from the Viking age, and that's the Gjermundbu helmet. From the same find is also the only fragment of maille which can be reliably dated to Viking age as well. The Germundbu helmet is a crude version of a helmet popular in the preceding Vendel age, from which we have numerous finds.
@Lysander455 жыл бұрын
So this was made three years ago, and it'd be interesting to see how you feel about the show given its current stories.
@geoff22048 жыл бұрын
One point about the geographical accuracy of the show. The 'Vikings' this series purports to depict were surely mostly Danes. Yet the scenery of their homeland is decidedly Norwegian. There are no steep-sided fjords or snow-capped mountains in Denmark.
@TotallyLostSoul8 жыл бұрын
Despite it's faults, I love Vikings. It's one of the best things on TV at the moment and I'm hooked!
@meirzamsky3 жыл бұрын
i heard that the nickname boneless came from him being sneaky like a snake and even tho snakes have bones its not hard to imagine people calling them boneless
@alriktyrving50518 жыл бұрын
Most of the regions of Scandinavia are not marked by "deep water fjords and mountains". Only Norway is. Sweden and escpecially Denmark, where the "real" Ragnar supposedly came from, are quite flat and would at the time have consisted of mostly plain woodlands. Most of the vikings coming to England were actually people from Denmark and what is now southern Sweden, yet vikings in English and American recostructions are almost always portrayed as coming from Norway?! What is that all about? I know, fjords and mountains are beautiful and all, but you have to let it go if you want to be accurate. Ragnar is not based on ONE historical figure but probably at least on two. A Swedish prince of the eighth century namned Ragnar Ringsson and a Danish raider called Reginherus. In the sagas he is therefore described both as the son of a Swedish king and as a Dane. His oldest son Björn the Ironsside supposedly inherited the Swedish kingdom after Ragnars death and became the founder of the old Swedish dynasty, while a younger son named Sigurd Snake- in-the-Eye, inherited Denmark.
@e.rudsar16336 жыл бұрын
Well Sweden had “stormaktstiden”, and Denmark basically annexed Norway for 400 years, so I’ll say we just give it a pass
@charlesxll79258 жыл бұрын
As long as they don't have bloody horns on their helmets it's good enough for me!
@YABBAHEY16 жыл бұрын
Too bad no one told them that they would be depicted w/horns accompanied by Vaugner , bet they would've loved that.
@CarlosAlbertoZalazar4 жыл бұрын
Mister Hodges, I used to like learning aboot world history. After watching your videos, I do not like it anymore. Now, I do love it! As soon as I get off my massive credit debt, your channel will be the first one to receive my monetary support. Cheers. I enjoy you channels enormously.
@AslanW2 жыл бұрын
Ragnar Lothbrok is what Swedish historians refer to as a "sagokung", which literally translates to "fairy tale king". As far as I know, there's disputes over whether or not Ragnar Lothbrok even was an actual person that existed. Even if he existed, most historians seem to agree that his accomplishments have both been "supplemented" with the accomplishments of other people from the same era; an amalgamation of a multitude of people into a singular character, as well as with completely fictive accomplishments more akin to fantasy. His "sons", however, did exist with absolute certainty, but there's no way of knowing if their father actually was Ragnar.
@shelbybrown83125 жыл бұрын
I read that the French used to end the The Lord's Prayer with "and free us from the Norseman" lol
@ХристоМартунковграфЛозенски3 жыл бұрын
Kinda like later in central Europe, where they prayed God to "save us from the arrows of the Magyars".
@ChaosToRule6 жыл бұрын
I once sailed on a wooden boat built back in 1904. With all the sails set and favorable conditions it could "only" make 11.5 knots. Great video
@tavuzzipust78878 жыл бұрын
Only started watching Vikings recently. I like it well enough as entertainment. But the portrayal in the second episode of Season 1 of the Celtic monks of late 8th-century Lindisfarne dressed (and tonsured) in the manner of Franciscan friars founded in early 13th-century Italy is a real howler and shows little care for historical accuracy.
@pierdurin8 жыл бұрын
+Tavuzzi Pust I thought exactly the same. There isn't much care for showing a good reconstruction of the costumes and location of the christian peoples and the clergy back then. They just seem to make efforts trying to present a familiar and stereotyped image of the christians, instead of of an historically accurate one.
@dylantennant65946 жыл бұрын
Tavuzzi Pust Those were not Celtic priests, they were Saxons. While the Celts lived in England prior to the Viking age, they were driven out by the Saxons into Wales, Scotland and Ireland. The closet place in England that was Celtic, was Cornwall in the south.
@LazyPeanut018 жыл бұрын
14:10 this fucking scene, i swear to god is the best scene in the entire series. That terryfying smile goddamn Ragnar can be terrifying.
@schishne75465 жыл бұрын
True,that was realy terrifying,but also badass
@camcamcam486 жыл бұрын
Watching this after everything happened really made my jaw drop.. you were legit SPOT ON with your predictions...
@MrAWG98 жыл бұрын
How can you expect Hollywood to get Viking dress portrayed properly when they continue to make dinosaurs without feathers and velociraptors over 2m tall?
@Verdunveteran8 жыл бұрын
A great Review! But...i really have to question your description of Scandinavia. Deep fjords and mountaineus terrain miht be true for the majority of Norway, but certainly not for Denmark and Sweden. Denmark is almost as flat as a pancake! It's highest natural point above sea level is Møllehøj that is 170,86 meters high. So no mountains there but there are a few fjords. Here in Sweden were I live we do have a few mountains, the highest beeing Kebnekaise at 2099 meters above sea level. It's part of the Scandinavian mountain range running along the border of northern Sweden and Norway. But for the rest we really don't have much mountains, especially not as high and impressive as seen in the show Vikings. Sweden was then and still is a mostly wooded country with a rolling landscape and a few great areas that are very flat. And when it comes to your description of our climate here it's a bit off aswell. Scandinavia is not completely frozen in or snowed over in the Winter, especially not in the southern third of Sweden and in Denmark. I live in Skåne, the most southern province of Sweden and I can tell you that we are lucky (or unlucky depending on ones point of view) if we have one or two continious week with more than 10 cm of snow in a year here. When we get snow it usually rains away whithin hours or days. We actually have so little snow here in southern Sweden and in Denmark that it creats kaos every time we actually recieve a fair amount of snow because there are no real preparation for it so all road or train traffic becomes HUGE problems. And during the Viking era our climate here was actually warmer than it is today so that frozen Scandinavia really depends on were in Scandinavia you lived. In the South of Sweden and in Denmark you would have about the same climate then just as today as in the UK or worthwestern Germany or the Netherlands. In northern Sweden and in Norway however they would have got plenty of snow back then, just as they do today.
@eskilsolver51026 жыл бұрын
Skåne e redigt najs
@chatteyj5 жыл бұрын
Indeed I thought the same as he said it, southern Scandinavia is a very similar climate as much of England and also during the Viking era the climate was warmer hence why Greenland is so called. Its something anti climate change people do not like to acknowledge.
@duder66665 жыл бұрын
I stumbled across your videos about a month ago and have been binging them ever since. Fantastic work you're doing.
@martinemouth-breaker19398 жыл бұрын
You should totally review the Last Kingdom!
@Thriftxxxx3 жыл бұрын
“Never going to touch on characters like Leif erikson” 5 years later... Vikings Valhalla info showcasing Leif erikson.
@BergenDev6 жыл бұрын
"I slayed a dragon to win her hand" Translation; I showed her my slong to win her hand. :P
@Vairy_29724 жыл бұрын
BergenDev He probably killed a crocodile or some such similar giant scaled beast
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
Radman Kurze There are crocodiles in Scandinavia?
@wolfthornnholtzklau49134 жыл бұрын
@@alexman378 maybe maybe not
@alexman3784 жыл бұрын
WolfThornn Holtzklau It doesn’t really seem like the go-to environment for crocodiles...
@seniorscouse33464 жыл бұрын
I showed her my slong then put it in her hand
@madamwinnifer46668 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the recommendation. I must check this out. To be honest was expecting wank like Ironclad. Any show that has the balls to make the main characters horrible people, especially in the name of authenticity, has to at least be worth a go. Also that Child Lover part went a completely different direction to what I was expecting.
@matheusb.dambrowski46398 жыл бұрын
ikr
@revinaque13428 жыл бұрын
I just started watching Vikings on his recommendation, and it is fantastic! Normally, I don't have much patience for TV series, but I've been watching 5-6 episodes a night! I'm going to run out of episodes before the week is through. Lol. Totally worth it. Like Sherlock, it's a series that doesn't underestimate the viewers' intelligence.
@matheusb.dambrowski46398 жыл бұрын
Revina Que Yep
@marypigott52138 жыл бұрын
+Revina Que Same here. I started watching last week and am half way through season three..I love historic shows and this one is one of the best I've seen.
@tonyprimera43088 жыл бұрын
can you do Netflix's Marco Polo????
@MultiB2D5 жыл бұрын
I'm a Mongolian and i love history, Marco Polo was a good series in my opinion, it got many things right but it got many things wrong too. The cool thing is during the series the background characters are sometimes heard talking in Mongolian for example the guards can be heard saying things like "make way peasant", "the king has arrived". The biggest gripes i have with the series is how Mongolian wrestling is shown, my god is it horrendous, its showing 2 people basically just slapping each other back and forth. In actual Mongolian wrestling, you get up close and personal with one another and try to drop the other to the ground whether it by sheer power or by using techniques. The other thing is that Khublai Khaan never executed his brother Arig.
@centurionyt44725 жыл бұрын
Peter it’s a shame it got cancelled I really liked it
@ConsortiumOfTheBrain6 жыл бұрын
Why did it take me so long to find this magnificence, you deserve so much more subs
@Figgy51198 жыл бұрын
have you seen The Last Kingdom? it's another Viking age of England story, but from the point of view of the Saxons, namely Wessex, aka the last English kingdom.
@rmmario33968 жыл бұрын
Whoa...good info to share...I just brought it up and will check out its first season. It got great ratings and it looks like season two is on the way. Thanks for sharing...
@dartholiver8 жыл бұрын
here is one review :D /watch?v=vCJUDdEirco
@sean6688 жыл бұрын
He even uses clips from The Last Kingdom in the video.
@elpresidente57678 жыл бұрын
1-i will watch the serie 2- the englsih kingdom was created in 1066 by guillaume le conquèrant :3
@tobiaslindblom21878 жыл бұрын
Also known as William the bastard. His great-great-great-great grandfather was Rollo (featured in the Vikings Series).
@hannahrozenberg34113 жыл бұрын
I follow a channel that focuses on Norse Magic and Beliefs, and I learned that the shield-maidens were not like the shield-maidens seen in the show. They were women who actually stood behind the shield walls and held the shields, and of someone lost their shield, they’d run out to give them a new one. The Vikings greatly valued the lives of women, children and the elderly. They never wanted their women to go into battle.
@ravespartalive6496 Жыл бұрын
The music ( Ragnars vision -season 4 episode 6) is absolutely outstanding!!
@BOBBYRIF15 жыл бұрын
There may have been inconsistencies...but you gotta admit..it was a badass series!!
@HammeringHen6 жыл бұрын
11:00 "Brother Maynard, thatch the holy hand grenade"
@appendixpower55387 жыл бұрын
13:50 oh the mount and blade main menu guy is "the child lover"
@itchykami8 жыл бұрын
Vikings got me listening to Fever Ray. That alone won it lots of points.
@Nana-vi4rd4 жыл бұрын
I am a descendant of Rollo, and of William the Bastard, I loved this show but no longer can watch not having a TV and can not afford to rent or buy it not even to stream it. I wish someone would make a show about William the Conqueror as well as a truthful one about Edward Long-shanks. His portrayal in Brave-heart could have been better. But then they couldn't have him out do the Hero of the movie could they. Thanks for your upload, can't wait to hear about your opinion once you have watched the next season. Will be anxiously waiting to watch your commentary. Thank you once again.
@davidmchugh49624 жыл бұрын
Ask your grandfather Rollo has he got loot left over for a TV
@thenickseditious8 жыл бұрын
dude Athelstan was about to be killed by Rollo and Ragnar told him no this one is mine so yes Ragnar did indeed tell his men not to kill an unarmed priest
@HistoryBuffs8 жыл бұрын
The only reason why Ragnar told him not to kill Athelstan was because he could speak Norse. Athalstan's knowledge of England and other western lands were extremely valuable. He didn't save him out of the kindness of his heart. Remember he wanted to sacrifice Athelstan in a later episode
@thenickseditious8 жыл бұрын
+History Buffs yea but u said that he didn't try to stop a single priest from getting killed. regardless he did was my point
@HistoryBuffs8 жыл бұрын
I said, "We don't see Ragnar step in and stop his men killing innocents," as in more than one person. He let the Vikings kill anyone else except Athalstan who he took as a slave. That hardly counts as him saving his life. My point is that he didn't have that bullshit scene of him being a good guy that we see in every other movie.
@thenickseditious8 жыл бұрын
+History Buffs no we didn't have that bullshit I agree and its why I love this show.
@caesarsalad448 жыл бұрын
+History Buffs at first ragnar took Athelstan to use him at his own advantage but than ragnar respected Athelstan and did not wanted his death. so yeah Floki made a wrong decision by killing him.
@RepublicOfUs3 жыл бұрын
....Just from this intro, I feel like Nick saw an alternate-reality version of this show.
@dragob77807 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad I found this video AFTER I watched season 4 of The Vikings. Mr. Hodges, your predictions proved to be true!
@RaccoonAvenger4 жыл бұрын
I have only one comment. There are No moutains in Denmark. Hedeby is flat, area around Kattegat is flat. Denmark is flat
@ZigZag-mw9ir4 жыл бұрын
Kattegat is in Norway... Yes Ragnar was king of Denmark, BUT also Norway. Plus it is in mountainous region.
@RayB16563 жыл бұрын
Kattegat is not a city !
@mikkellorentzen43014 жыл бұрын
I like how you’re showing inaccuracies of the show while still being respectful to its creators.
@AtlasNL5 жыл бұрын
When watching the show, I was so surprised that I could understand the when they spoke Anglo-Saxon (?). As it was very similar to old Dutch! Very nice details!
@davidmchugh49624 жыл бұрын
Going even further back Scandinavia ( named after Scania in Sweden) is an area known as the womb of nations along with the Altai mountain region so all Germanic languages and people's originate there
@tomurg8 жыл бұрын
Could you please doa review of The Last Kingdom??
@wishiwascooler8 жыл бұрын
I thought some of the footage looked like it was from that show! I may have been mistaken though. Love that series so far and the books are phenomenal!
@tomurg8 жыл бұрын
wishiwascooler How many of the books have yo read??
@wishiwascooler8 жыл бұрын
I think there are 2 or 3 out now that I haven't read, I need to get back to them. He is a fantastic writer and his trilogy of books based on the King Arthur mythology is some of the best I have ever read.
@panjul-g9h8 жыл бұрын
lindybeige has review it, go watch it! it's funny
@tomurg8 жыл бұрын
+World's Future Leader Seen it, Loved it.
@snakey934Snakeybakey5 жыл бұрын
Excellent Video, just a few things to add. Shieldmaidens were never a thing outside of stories. There is no evidence to suggest that Alfred the Great was born out of wedlock. There is no evidence of the English Christians using mutilation as a punishment for adultery. The Christians certainly never used crucifixion as a punishment, they saw it as a noble and saintly way to die. And something very pertinent to seasons 4&5; Bjorn was not the son of Lagertha, but one of the 6 sons of Auslag.
@Henrik_Holst5 жыл бұрын
Shieldmaidens was most likely a real thing. We have several graves from the Viking age here in Scandinavia where Women are buried with weapons. And then you have the accounts of Saxo Grammaticus and e.g the Siege of Dorostolon. Scholars are divided on the issue, but "where never a thing outside of stories" is so far not fact either.
@irishsaint89 Жыл бұрын
People of status were buried with weapons. The huge gap in physical strength and importance of women for keeping the civilization alive , wouldn’t make sense for them to fight. Think about it, the strongest women to exist are right now bcz of steroids women take. They didn’t have that back then. Women would get get bulldozed. I’m in construction and most women can’t lift jack hammers let alone wear armor and fight men. We need to stop judging history with our values and understanding
@lakkakka6 жыл бұрын
this reminded me to check for s5 of vikings, which is apparantly already completely done. Which is awesome because I can bingewatch the whole thing.
@Swindondruid28 жыл бұрын
As a former Viking re-enactor I was so upset at the historical inaccuracies in the first couple of episodes of Series 1 that I never watched any other episodes. But then, I am notoriously petty and pedantic. Looks like I might have to see a few more episodes.
@Trailerglotzer6 жыл бұрын
I also have this inner conflict. :D
@elsakristina26898 жыл бұрын
About how in the sagas it says that Ivar the Boneless was born without any bones in his legs, if the theory about him possibly having brittle bone disease is true, then the people writing the sagas and telling the stories by word of mouth before they were written down probably just thought that Ivar did not have leg bones because his legs would have been deformed and twisted from the breaks healing improperly and maybe also from disuse (it is common for sufferers of the disease to break a lot of bones just while being born, and if a person, especially a child, goes without using their legs for years at a time, and also if those legs are broken, the leg or legs will become deformed and atrophied from disuse).
@pupintheturdiii8 жыл бұрын
You watched a super cancer Documentary. That fucking Dwarf was a sad little man.
@shmee123ful7 жыл бұрын
I just love that part of the review around 14:14 when nick starts talking about Viking terror traits and we see the long boats sailing up the river adorned with mutalated body's and heads. Then we hear the drums and that cord of music that gos buzz that's some pants to be darken moments right there
@tuxino8 жыл бұрын
At 11:05 Of course the priests would be killed. They were calling out strange incantations, attempting to summon the assistance of their foreign god(s).
@lunda22227 жыл бұрын
I have to disagree on the "slaughter everybody" thing. Sometimes they raided, other times they traded. But here's the thing: The main commodity they got on their raid was slaves which they sold. The biggest slave port at the time was Dublin. Killing everybody would simply put be wasting money.
@azm018 ай бұрын
Well 8 years later and leif erikson is the main protagonist in Vikings Valhalla
@SputnikRX8 жыл бұрын
The biggest inaccuracy is that there is no such things as "Viking civilization" or "Viking peoples"
@twitchypaper13917 жыл бұрын
SputnikRX it never said so and in fact the characters in the show use the term viking as a term for raider or raiding.
@myplane1507 жыл бұрын
This was good. I would love to hear what you think, Nick, about the way the story has continued in season 4. I, personally, hated that they skipped 10 years of so and killed Ragnar this season already. Obviously, they wanted to get on with the stories concerning the sons but, damn, I miss Ragnar.
@fredlmadatt38465 жыл бұрын
Found a new favorite channel
@ethanriley776 жыл бұрын
I love your channel, it's really a pleasure to listen to your reviews. However, I don't understand how you can be so kind with that serie. Especially when the whole story is so messed up: events happen in the wrong order, the main character is some kind of legend, some people coexist with people who should not be alive anymore / born yet. Cities which should not be taken at that time are taken. And most of viking cultural elements are false or unproven. You have doomed to hell certain movies for the same reasons, but here rearranging History is acceptable... Anyway, congrats for your channel!
@Heidenspross5 жыл бұрын
like east anglia belonging to wessex... horseshit (and i'm being kind)
@kwameadu00754 жыл бұрын
I 100% agree. It's no better than Braveheart but he trashed that film.
@ajwestgate30668 жыл бұрын
nick you should do a HBO rome review
@benarmstrong38582 жыл бұрын
“This show will never cover famous explorers like lief erikson “
@robstjw5 жыл бұрын
Love this stuff! Would love to see you review the accuracy of Netflix’s “The Last Kingdom”. Maybe it’s already been done and I missed it? Anyhow, The Last Kingdom is like Vikings on steroids! I saw that you used some clips, and got excited! Please!!?
@PointlessSillyName5 жыл бұрын
"Norsemen" - the Norwegian (mostly in English) comedy series about Vikings on Netflix. I'm sure it's highly inaccurate historically, but it's hilarious to watch Norwegians take the piss out of their own heritage!
@miccarter14034 жыл бұрын
Great use of The Last Kingdom which, brother, you would have a blast going through... A fictional protagonist during one of the coolest parts of history 👌👌👌 I want to see you do THAT show
@caseyhinkson90437 жыл бұрын
I noticed you have a lot of clips from "The Last Kingdom" in this video. I love that show/ book series. Could you review that one please?
@hemmingwayfan8 жыл бұрын
Spoiler alerts for stuff that happened 1200 years ago
@nicolavanrhyn17264 жыл бұрын
I was visiting Ecuador and the hotel manager was Swedish and married to an Ecuadorian woman. He used to tell the Viking sagas to his children. He said that he found the accuracy of this series to be phenomenal. Yes, some license used but someone who holds tightly to his heritage, he was so happy to talk about this show. He bought me a book to read about the Vikings but written in Spanish for me to exercise my limited vocabulary. I found it incredible that he tells the sagas to his kids. Pretty violent stories but he wanted to preserve his culture.
@borrburison6484 жыл бұрын
Kind of ironic to tell the sagas to his non swedish kids lol
@Jacob-ge1py Жыл бұрын
@@borrburison648 That's not ironic
@borrburison648 Жыл бұрын
@@Jacob-ge1py it is though
@jakelowe41288 жыл бұрын
Regards sends his Carmine
@robertmccutcheon41038 жыл бұрын
one slight inaccuracy vikings were not 100% illiterate they were illiterate by choice in that they did not believe in writing down there history and believed that all stories, religous edict and traditions must be told orally. there is some written documents from the vikings but it is only like trade manifests saying so and so has ordered 15 bags of grain he is to deliver x amount of gold in 9 days or something.
@Trailerglotzer6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for pointing that out.
@Heidenspross5 жыл бұрын
also the norse didn't invent the longship... the saxons used them to get to england in the first place... the norse perfected the longship but didn't invent it dammit!
@r0b0saurusrex806 жыл бұрын
You sir did not disappoint. Great Video! I love this series and have been watching since season 1. Accurate enough for me and while some commenters dont like the depictions of the Vikings I do appreciate the brutality of the Vikings. We living in present day have no idea of what it was like to live back then, to have death at your side always.
@ritamargherita7 жыл бұрын
Love your channel, such a nerd fest! Have you thought about doing The Last Kingdom, since you already used material here? :)
@gilbertotoledo14216 жыл бұрын
Where did the moors get Greek fire from? I thought Greek fire was a very closely guarded secret of the byzantine empire.
@tobbcittobbcit88995 жыл бұрын
They did not had greek fire, but they got those cool ulfberth swords
@gunengineering13382 жыл бұрын
On your point about using the sun to navigate. I live in Alaska which is obviously in that northern latitude. The sun behaves completely different up here than further south. In sted of rising in the east, going mostly straight across the sky and setting in the west, the sun spins around the sky at a slant, dipping below the horizon. In the summer it's only below the horizon for a few hours but in the winter it's only above the horizon for 6 or 7 hours during the solstices. And you can also easily tell which month it is by the day and night cycles as they differ considerably every month. So it makes sense that this would be especially useful to ancient people in this part of the world.
@hammsbeerbearshootingrange37168 жыл бұрын
the last kingdom are you going to review that?
@MrBomasBalloons8 жыл бұрын
How about "Turn: Washington's Spies" ?
@gewitterhund3164 Жыл бұрын
When i started the show i stopped after two episodes. But not for historical incorrectness. I stopped for the language. For example: They depicted as heathens and yet they use words like "January". They used a different calendar until the 12th century. And that is just a small example which rubs me the wrong way. I am fussy when it comes to language...
@SuperOverlord948 жыл бұрын
Not only are your videos interesting to watch, but they give me suggestions on good movies and shows to watch. Now I really need to find a site to watch Vikings. Any ideas on where I can find it?
@Erikaaaaaaaaaaaaa8 жыл бұрын
+SuperOverlord94 HBO!
@jesztheralano35958 жыл бұрын
+SuperOverlord94 couchtuner.ch
@judahlicharowicz54378 жыл бұрын
If you have Amazon prime you can watch all the seasons.
@CleliaSarai8 жыл бұрын
Hulu
@675walker8 жыл бұрын
+SuperOverlord94 putlocker.is all seasons on their
@whiteoctober45827 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who got pissed when they killed Sigurd Snake-in-the-eye
@monroecorp96806 жыл бұрын
nah sigurd was annoying n dweeby. Dunno what it was, the way he held himself was just... worthy of getting axe'd, y'know? Ivar's way better
@emillonnqvist51646 жыл бұрын
Yeah but he was supposed to become the king of denmark
@Heidenspross5 жыл бұрын
@@emillonnqvist5164 and was probably the grandfather of haraldr fairhair...
@balduran.5 жыл бұрын
I didn´t mind, after Ragnar died, I knew I am not watching season 5 anyway. But yeah, out of the brothers, Sigurd and Ubbe sometimes were the only interesting ones.