3D Scanning for Free

[@Holocreators]

If you would like to learn more about free 3D-scanning or creating a 3D scan using your cell phone, check out our website: holocreators.com/blog/3d-scanning-for-free/ Meshroom works best with an Nvidia GPU. When not using a Nvidia graphics card, then you need to use “draft meshing”: Holocreators is a 3D-scanning and reverse engineering company. We'd love to help you with your projects. Please call us [phone] or write us an email: [e-mail]

[@Дима-м7л9э]

Hello. Can you tell me, how I can scan something bigger. How I can scan a car? Thanks

[@Joe_Not_A_Fed]

This is such a good tutorial. No distracting music, no droning on about nothing...just well presented, useful information. This is how instructional content is done, folks. Subscribed.

[@Holocreators]

Thanks Joe for the kind words.

[@mgpmbass3616]

Agreed! It's nice to have a detailed tutorial that isn't ruined by loud background music.

[@delsings]

Totally agree! It was very clear to understand, and I appreciated that he mentioned the difference deviation average at the start too. Also subscribed from this. 👍 good stuff

[@galaxya40s95]

Yep, I got way more than I expected from this. Not only I learned how 3D scanning is done and that I can easily do it for free. I was handed the tools on a silver plate. And if I ever need better accuracy I know this is the company I will contact first. This is how advertisement is done. Give something for free (great tutorial) and get user hooked. Liked, subscribed, bookmarked and downloaded the video, same with their site, shared to friends.

[@QuantumKatmusic]

I just wish more content creators followed this principle, so much filler in a lot of articles and videos. Remember when you had to write numerous page essays in school or like they had a mandatory amount of words, so most people would write in a bunch of nonsense to fill up enough on their work to qualify the little bit of actually important substance? Read articles online that have lots of dumb filler and look how they write it, it looks just like high-school all over again. Not a useful skill.

[@officiallyanthony]

A 3D scanning company just made a video tutorial about how you don't generally need professional 3D scanning, and how using your phone and a bunch of free programs is more than good enough? This is immediately the best 3D scanning company I've ever seen

[@____________________________.x]

That shows real confidence in their abilities

[@Holocreators]

Sure I love if more people get to 3d scan things. By the way we offer xray ct scanning too. I am working on a video how to do xray scanning at home ;-)

[@tugruler]

@@Holocreatorsbruh u r crazey but in a good way :) subbed keep it up Ps: i have no interest whatsoever to scan anything:)

[@TobiasSteinhausler]

A nice, calm tutorial. And a good way to promote your own company without pushing it too hard. Well done!

[@Holocreators]

I appreciate that, Thank you Toby.

[@peralind3257]

Thanks! I've done different kind of videos decades and it's good to see really pro-made tutorial as this is. Relaxing and clear explanations, no disturbing discomusic, no idiotic camera moving. Once again, thank you very much. I'm sure your company is also good and pro.

[@Holocreators]

thank you

[@stephenedwards3397]

i am delighted to have stumbled accross your channel. I am a metrlogy professional having worked for a couple of OEM's as well as the original inventor of the CMM in my forty plus year career. I have found myself getting in to scanning and reverse engineering on a deep level this past year and am enjoying immensely this evolution of metrology technology. I appreciate greatly the clear, concise and helpful tutorials. A lot of people like to hide their expertise, making it look like some kind of secret, magic black art. Thank you once again, and having now subscribed I shall look at all the other videos that you have posted.

[@Holocreators]

thank you very much Stephen

[@Holocreators]

Viewer David Wilson found out that you "You MUST have a NVIDIA graphics card" to run Meshroom successfully. So if you don't have this kind of hardware you might want to look into Photogrammetry Software alternatives like Reality Capture. Where is Meshroom saving the 3D files? This question has been asked by many of you. Answer: When clicking the "Start" Button for the first time, Meshroom will ask you where to save the Cashe folder: normally it goes to C:/Users/Computer-name/AppData/local/Temp/MeshroomCashe In that location Meshroom will save all the project files. After the photogrammetry process is finished look for the "Meshing" folder, inside you will find the 3D model (OBJ)!

[@Pyotr_Troyan]

Where would you go onto printing after you made your 3D scan?

[@Holocreators]

@@Pyotr_Troyan just send it to shapeways

[@virtuosyc]

I am new to the realm of 3D printing technology, and I just want to thank you for providing such a comprehensive explanation. Your efforts have ensured that even someone with limited understanding, like myself, is able to comprehend the information effectively.

[@Holocreators]

Awesome, thank you!

[@JamesDoylesGarage]

BEST 3D free tutorial as of the date of my post. How do I know? I've been searching this subject all Fking day lol. dozens of tutorials. When I take my work to the professional level. These are the guys, I'm going to call. Thank you so much for getting right to the good stuff. HAPPY TO SUBSCRIBE!

[@Holocreators]

thank you james

[@mmnyako]

Wow... it's amazing what one can do with technology these days. Thank you for sharing

[@Holocreators]

Thanks for watching

[@Handskemager]

I’m actually amazed at the similarities of the 2 scans. The Photogrammetry would be enough for my project atm, I need to do a fair amount of modification / post processing anyways. Thanks for the tutorial!

[@Holocreators]

Happy you liked it

[@shakejones]

Well done mate, great video+explanation+presentation! Thank you for sharing - NEW SUB 🙏🏻

[@Holocreators]

thank you

[@vipingopal1949]

Great tutorial. As the company itsself sell scanned product eventhough they explain how to produce a free scanned product. That interest me a lot. Thanks for the video

[@Holocreators]

Thank you.

[@Engineerboy100]

Great job on this tutorial comparison. I am currently in the market for my first 3D printer and plan to do some scanning as well. Thank you for posting this I will be watching more of your videos as I just subscribed. I think more traditional engineers like myself should learn 3D scanning and printing as additional tools for whatever their discipline.

[@Holocreators]

thank you Clint

[@hayden199516]

Excellent video! I appreciate this quick, and straight forward tutorial. Thanks Holocreators!

[@Holocreators]

Thank you.

[@bellostephen6791]

This is such a priceless tutorial! Thank you for making this available to the community!

[@Holocreators]

thank you very much.

[@martinhristov4476]

Damn this is awesome, now i can 3d print anything i want, i just had this idea of scanning something and converting it to stl 3d model from pics, didnt think this was actually this affordable.

[@Holocreators]

Hi Martin, yes you can. The Scans can look rough sometimes and cutting away unwanted elements just in meshlab can be not enough. Then you should probably also open the scans in blender and do some more cleanup there. But then you can scale it and export and 3d print it. Have a wonderful day. Kind regards. Swann

[@tarikazizi8597]

Great explanation....i like people like you...go to the point directly without wasting time by empty Talk...bless you great man

[@Holocreators]

thank you that is very kind, I tried my best to make it brief and to the point

[@joetylerdale]

Brilliant! It seems like a lot of work (and it is somewhat), but if you only have needs occasionally for a part that is unavailable or prohibitive in price, this is amazing! Thank You very much, very much!

[@Holocreators]

Thank you for the kind words. Have a wonderful weekend.

[@khaledabedalghany1923]

Thank you Sir! I really appreciate the pedagogical teaching method and the simplicity in illustration And opening possibilities for people with low or 0 budget You are a good teacher.. Wish you the best 👌

[@Holocreators]

Thank you.

[@TechMalaya]

Damn bro. I don't believe I watch this video until finish cause your explanation very interesting. woww

[@Holocreators]

Thank you

[@eitantal726]

6:24 I'd fine-align again after deleting the floor. One object has a floor, the other does not. This might confuse the aligner. Also, because these are 2 different objects, each might have an ever so slight scaling deviation from the other. I suspect this is where the 0.2mm error came from

[@Holocreators]

Yes could be, these were also not perfect scans. But i think the viewer gets the point.

[@totusvision]

This is a great video that does an excellent job of demonstrating the two methods of 3D scanning Thanks for the tutorial Swann

[@Holocreators]

Glad it was helpful!

[@originalhotrodder4337]

Thank you for making this video. This is the best quick start video for Meshroom I could find on KZbin. Subscribed!

[@Holocreators]

thanks, glad you like it

[@davidbutcher6637]

Really great you taking your time to explain things, the item could be hung on fishing line and then do all photos in one hit.Quite keen to try this method.

[@Holocreators]

Hi, the part is not allowed to move during the individual pictures you take. So in all pictures the parts has to remain in the exact same position. Otherwise the photogrammetry process will not work.

[@Seemsayin]

​@@Holocreators You're obviously smarter than the average bear. So please forgive me if I sound pretentious. I like David Butcher's idea. And it beg's the question... Why should the part not be allowed to move? Would it be so that the object maintains some point of reference to where it sits, in relation to the camera? If so... then wouldn't the surrounding objects (to which the main object is resting on) become part of the main object? Yes. They would. But... why should the software require any additional connected parts? For a point of reference? Hmmm. Interesting. The real question is... Taking pictures at different angles creates movement. If pictures are being snapped, by hand... the camera is then ...not stationary. What difference does it make whether it's the camera, or the object being moved? The object being photographed is the ONLY true point of reference. The object's background, OR WHATEVER IT'S RESTING ON in any photo is irrelevant, since it gets edited out anyway. So... why would anything extra, connected to the main object, be necessary? Why would having your camera shot conform to an x/y axis, in relation the object's center, be necessary when either x or y is not a constant? Because the ONLY REQUIRED points of reference are with the object. Anything else is irrelevant. And, then again... I could be wrong. My apologies if I've missed something. Thank you taking time & making the effort to post this. Much appreciated.

[@Holocreators]

@@Seemsayin Hi, I am no scientist and I don't know how photogrammetry software really works. The way I understand it is that in a first step the position from where the photos were taken needs to be calculated. That is easier when the object remains stationary, because then the background can also be used for the camera position calculation. But photogrammetry software gets better and better and it could be that its now also possible to have the object aswell as the camera move. As long as the object itself doesn't change.

[@Seemsayin]

@@Holocreators Ya see? I knew there was something I was missing. Thanks for your reply.

[@____________________________.x]

I’m never going to do this, but that was an incredibly well made and informative video, well done 👍

[@Holocreators]

I am happy you enjoyed it.

[@k13ehr]

What an excellent video, I have absolutely no need of this tech, it just looked interesting and indeed it was, were I 40-50 years younger I may have had a go at it, well made, well explained, well done.

[@Holocreators]

Thank you very much.

[@AlphaEngineer2022]

Great video of how to get up and running quickly! I find a lot of other videos bore me, thanks for the great content!

[@clayton9136]

This one isnt boring? I feel like I'm in hs social studies.

[@Holocreators]

Glad you enjoyed!

[@neatt3815]

Taking all those photos looks a little tedious. Curious to see if it's possible to record a video instead, then convert the video to a bunch of images and use those instead. I'm impressed at how good the scan turned out 👍

[@Holocreators]

Good point! But make sure its a high resolution video without camera shake or you will not get a good reconstruction. I have tried it.

[@seicosid]

Amazing tutorial. Thank you! Something I always wanted to try. Keep the vids coming! 👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@Holocreators]

Thanks Jean. :-)

[@davesenor3146]

Awesome video. Well documented and easy to understand. Thank you for posting!

[@Holocreators]

Thanks Dave

[@davidvalens3337]

would love to see more videos like this!

[@Holocreators]

thank you ;-) Did you see the STL to STEP video, its the sequal kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5LJn2iEbsuDmqM

[@rickewi]

Awesome tutorial! Very easy to follow and understand where to start going into this!

[@Holocreators]

Glad it was helpful!

[@wagnercateb456]

Excellent tutorial, really useful and well done. Thank you and congratulations for the great job!

[@Holocreators]

Glad it was helpful!

[@peterkelley6344]

As my siblings, and I, disposed of the belongings from my parents last house ... I was able to grab an antique (probably early 1900’s) globular, store display, dispensing jar made of glass. Our family over the generations have used this as a cookie jar. As I was cleaning it, it soon became clear that the cover that now exists was not the cover it originally had. To my best guess the original cover may have been glass, or possibly even a shaped steel sheet. The top of the jar has threads that suggest that it may have gently screwed on. Yes the worst case scenario is to strip the aluminum cover of its paint and repaint it to match the base of jar (presuming it came with the original jar) but then the threads of the actual jar would still be ignored. Questions: Would it be possible to get this jar scanned to both get: • The essence of these threads for reproduction of a new lid? • Would it also be possible to get a scan to capture the glass design with the thought to handing the scan to a glass craftsmen to reproduce a likeness it in a new cover? I am a person with multiple disabilities. The skills needed to produce a new cover for this antique are beyond my skill set. In the past I have tried to contact Minneapolis/St. Paul, Bloomington Minnesota area maker studios and all I have gotten is dead silence. Is there a ‘correct’ way to contact a Maker Studio to connect with a maker who might have the time to work with me on this project? OR is there a company in my area that help with this project?

[@Holocreators]

hello, scanning the threads of the jar is possible with this technique. But you have to take very high resolution images. The scan will then only be a starting point to analyze the thread pitch. this will need to be reconstructed inside a cad software to create a new lid. this new lid can then be 3d printed. I could do all of this for you, the price would be probably around 300-400 EUR. For a more accurate estimate please send me a picture of the jar and needed lid to [e-mail]

[@peterkelley6344]

@@Holocreators Thank you for a response. Your the first company that has actually made a response to my inquiries. I will send a separate response independently of this channel.

[@guys1743]

Great job, very interesting. Good luck for the future

[@Holocreators]

Thank you very much!

[@RutherfordRyan1]

Thank you for your effort in this production

[@Holocreators]

My pleasure!

[@jiritichy6855]

In reverse engineering discipline, it is not very important to be accurate on the surfaces.If there are not drawings(which is assumed,because if they are available, then you can just re-create the part, not need to scan it).And as far as the hole sizes and locations, you can check with caliper and readjust the scan, after you convert it into solid geometry on you CAD program(like SpaceClaim).....This, what you are showing here is very useful information for the industry. Can save a lot of money and time!

[@Holocreators]

Thank you Jiri, I agree when there are no drawings and complicated surfaces then Reverse Engineering is a great technology

[@woodwaker1]

Something that I think should be mentioned at the beginning is the requirements for hardware. You MUST have a NVIDIA graphics card. I have an I-5 and use internal graphics. After going through all of the steps and starting the conversion I finally figured out that It error ed out in step 7. I can understand that they built the software to use a specific hardware minimum, but many of us do not have it and I don't like wasting a couple of hours to find this out. [13:49:26.570938][warning] Could not determine number of CUDA cards in this system [13:49:26.568939][warning] No CUDA-Enabled GPU. [13:49:26.636961][error] cudaGetDeviceCount failed: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version [13:49:26.685967][info] Can't find CUDA-Enabled GPU. [13:49:26.709058][error] This program needs a CUDA-Enabled GPU (with at least compute capablility 2.0).

[@Holocreators]

Thanks David, I wrote your findings into the pinned comment. I wasn't aware of these hardware requirements.

[@woodwaker1]

@@Holocreators Thanks. I'm not even sure what the minimum card would be. It's been a long time since I added a video card to my builds as the internal graphics meet my needs.

[@woodwaker1]

@@Holocreators I have tried a number of other "free" programs, and feel that Meshroom looks very good.. I just ordered a refurbished NVIDIA card from NewEgg for $30 to try this out. Thanks for what you did with the video, would be great to update with what the minimum hardware would be to get at least a fair result.

[@Holocreators]

@@woodwaker1 yea correct, can't edit the video though, thats just an amazing amount of work. But I will put it later on the blog

[@woodwaker1]

@@Holocreators Thanks. I will let you know how this works. The card I ordered is a GeForce GT 730. I have been doing a lot of research and this card seems to meet the minimum requirements. Here is a link to the minimum hardware from Meshroom. meshroom-manual.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install/requirements/requirements.html

[@gg_2377]

Thank you for this clear, concise video!!!

[@Holocreators]

Glad it was helpful!

[@buyerenogurlfwendo2106]

So a lot of diffused lighting would be good for this.

[@Holocreators]

Yes you need a lot of diffused light for the best possible scan. Light is your friend.

[@android4cg]

Great video! Would be great to see also some tips and tricks on structured light scanning.

[@Holocreators]

Thanks. Yes I am planning to do a structured light video soon. What kind of tips and tricks are you expecting on that topic? Then I can include that in the next video.

[@normanonyxdagang7440]

@@Holocreators how to setup with micro dlp projectors and mobile phone for structured light scanning

[@Holocreators]

@@normanonyxdagang7440 That sounds like a fantastic idea. I will look into it. :-)

[@neusromero951]

BROOO thankyou so much, this really helped and the tutorial was really easy to use as well :)

[@Holocreators]

Glad it helped!

[@JacksonAcademy1]

This is an awesome video! But I have scanned a test model before and I didn't have to combine the top and bottom angles, it combined automatically in Meshroom. I think that's only the 2021/2022 update though. Great video!

[@Holocreators]

Great tip! I didn't know Meshroom had this function. Yea the video is already a little dated.

[@abrannan]

Out of curiosity, at 4:40 when you're scaling your photogrammetry model, why did you calculate a scaling percentage instead of using the "target size" measurement to input your 76.2mm? It seems like that would give you better accuracy, as there's no rounding of the scaling factor. I mean, obviously the results speak for themselves when compared to the professional scan, but I found that step odd.

[@Holocreators]

Hi Andrew, no particular reason, it's just one workflow that worked for me, if "target size" works better, then please use that

[@nuno9321]

YOU ARE A GOD... NO QUESTION ABOUT IT

[@Holocreators]

Thank you

[@pkf4124]

Great video, straight to the point, no messing around. +1 sub

[@Holocreators]

Thank you, much appreciated.

[@s.sunduck5576]

THANKS! With warm greetings from Siberia

[@Holocreators]

Thank you Sunduck. Best wishes to Siberia.

[@cekuhnen]

Btw image size matters Bigger images better detailed scans I shoot mainly with 108 MP or upscale 12 mp photos

[@Holocreators]

yes I agree. more pixels more accuracy.

[@imadjawad4408]

Thanks for such a great detailed explanation!

[@Holocreators]

Thank you Imad.

[@LateralTwitlerLT]

Thank you so much for creating and sharing all of this.

[@Holocreators]

You are so welcome!

[@Robmlufc]

That's awesome, great tutorial. Just off to go scan a 1/24 sports car!

[@Holocreators]

Glad it helped!

[@jiritichy6855]

Please mention also something about software/hardware compatibility...Mac/Windows, Intel/AMD, Nvidia/whatever else

[@Holocreators]

well, I am sure you'll find that information on the website of the software companies.

[@woodwaker1]

I agree - see my comment on the need for an NVIDIA card

[@Holocreators]

@@woodwaker1 I added it to the pinned comment

[@raflonoce]

I saw your video only today , congratulations , great work I would like to understand how photogrammetry works , I am sure that this video will be useful to me.

[@Holocreators]

Thanks and welcome

[@madkvideo]

EXCELLENT video my friend!

[@Holocreators]

Thank you

[@tallcypress]

Excellent video. It looks like picture-taking (200 pics in your case) is no doubt one of the longest processes in this project- would it be possible to use the Burst function on my iphone camera and use a slow sweeping motion (instead of incremental as you're demonstrating) to make the process a little faster? This should also allow taking of more pics for a better dataset. Of course, all of this is null if the pics are fuzzy. If one found themselves doing this on a repeated basis, a jig is in order- may be my next project :)

[@Holocreators]

Hello and thank you. I think the burst function should also work. Just check the pictures afterwards so they are alle in focus and not blurry. Kind regards. Swann

[@tallcypress]

Thanks Swann. Looks like someone had the same idea: kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2jIlmeggdCSd9U

[@Shoopadawhoopa]

@@tallcypress I'd avoid the burst function. With photogrammetry you rely on the sharpness of the images. To get perfect results a tripod and shooting one photo at a time is what i recommend.

[@reverse_engineered]

A turn table is often used to help with this. A steady tripod will also help to keep the distances similar. Then you can lock the focus on the camera so that things stay in focus. You'll probably find that taking pictures from further away helps things stay in focus better, especially with a good camera and a telephoto lens, since the differences of height on the details of the part will be small compared to the distance between the part and the camera, so it will remain in the depth of focus. If you have a decent DSLR camera, you can also use timed exposures or a simple remote to take pictures at regular intervals as you turn the part.

[@ryanlillie8469]

This took my, kinda high end 5 years ago, pc like 2 days to complete. Only just importing to mesh lab. Will update.

[@Holocreators]

curious. but two days seems pretty long

[@shoeoffhead3692]

Very good video. Given you have only a Galaxy S6, but get quite amazing photos for indoor shooting, I wonder what the lighting looks like? Seems like proper studio lighting. Can you please tell us more?

[@Holocreators]

Hello, for lighting I used two soft boxes. They make nice even lighting and you can get them on amazon.

[@astbrnrd]

Love what you're doing on this vid, thank you for the candid breakdown.

[@Holocreators]

thank you, very much appreciated

[@JGDeRuvo]

It would help to see the scanned models actually printed out.

[@Holocreators]

The part was indeed 3d printed in metal: www.classicindex.eu/images/0_galerie/Technik/3D/Beispiele/Tankgeber_kompl.jpg

[@jafinch78]

Thanks for detail and sharing for those of us on a pension!

[@Holocreators]

Our pleasure!

[@rotzepopel1381]

Just brilliant! I tried to scan my all black and shiny Earphones but at the first time it didnt worked at all. But a simple trick made a huge difference. I created a thin layer of flour around it and everything just worked fine. Now I can create my own ear hooks without spending an insane amount of money on Apple Beats. :D Thank you for your tutorial. (Danke Digger!). Maybe you can give this advice to noobs like me for the next tutorial of that matter. (:

[@Holocreators]

Thank you. I happy that this worked for you. Flour is a great idea, I tend recommend a specialized scanning spray also.

[@tatedido]

Hands down one of the most beautiful tutorials I have ever seen. Will this work with organic shapes - i want to do a 3d print of my dog ? Any suggestions ? Thank you :)

[@Holocreators]

hi, thanks for your reply. dogs are notoriously difficult to 3d scan. i have done it before. for that i would recommend a hand 3d scanner. you should search for something like artec 3d scan. once you have the file 3d printing is easy. any 3d printing company can do it, i always like to use shapeways

[@tatedido]

@@Holocreators thank you so much. Unfortunately the prices of this company are way way way out of my budget - i mean 13 - 14 K euro. Thats spicy. Thank you and all the best

[@perkrog8310]

I think it is a big minus at Meshroom, the program only runs on specific graphics cards. "Meshroom requires an NVIDIA GPU card with a CUDA compute capability >= 2.0 for the MVS part. "

[@Holocreators]

Hi Per, yes thats unfortunate. You could look into other software for photogrammetry like reality capture.

[@theremay]

Clear, detailed and very useful. Big thank you.

[@Holocreators]

thank you

[@mylesjarvis7571]

Thankyou! Straight forward and to the point! Excellent tutorial :)

[@Holocreators]

happy it helped

[@igormalusevic]

This is nice but easier way is to take photos from top, all sides and bottom and then measure diameter of bottom circle and then make new part in Fusion 360 (non commercial version) then save in stl file format and open and finish editing in FreeCad and save also in STL and then open in slicer.

[@Holocreators]

Yes you are right, but freeform surfaces you will not be able to create this way.

[@acheronlv-4268]

I'm a senior 3d modeler. not sure how useful are those 3d scanners right now, but i can model a cleaner piece of 3d model using my 3d modeling software than the results that you are showing in about 1/4 of the time.

[@Holocreators]

thank you for your input

[@raphaelmiranda3658]

Awesome tutorial! Loved the presentation style! I wonder if there`s any free or low budget combo i could arrange to improve precision and use this workflow you showcased for GD&T purposes.

[@Holocreators]

Hi Ralph, sorry I don't know how to help you there.

[@chaneldavid1]

Ima download it thanks for sharing!!

[@Holocreators]

Please do!

[@loganbritton4093]

Thank you for the video! I cant wait to try it out. I'm having issues downloading the windows version. Any advice?

[@Holocreators]

Hi Logan, no I don't know why there would be an issue with the windows version.

[@TheSillybits]

I find it very interesting, but it is not clear to my why scanning that object is more efficient than rebuilding it from scratch in a cad program. Seems to me that with some proper measurement tools dimensions can be taken more swiftly than doing all these steps as described in this video and the video about making the step or stl file

[@Holocreators]

Hi, really depends on the part. Freeform organic surfaces are really hard to model in cad. But you are right, this particular part you could have properly solely created in CAD. But I guess you came here for the 3d Scanning ;-)

[@GoldSrc_]

Amazing tutorial, it at least let me know that I can keep using Meshroom and save money for better PC hardware. Even though 3DF Zephyr's price is still tempting.

[@gene_Code]

Inefficient placement of the Dyson fan.

[@Holocreators]

haha, thanks. It's my friends. Was quite hot that day in the office ;-)

[@FeWolf]

Thank you, this will help in replacement parts for my RC planes

[@Holocreators]

Hi, glad it was helpful. Have a great day.

[@FeWolf]

@@unsp0k3nst0ry winds are not much of issue, mostly front cowling and such

[@mindbreak666]

Would a small welder's turntable, a tripod, some lights and an object of known size at known distance make this even better?

[@Holocreators]

Yes you could get a better result that way. But make sure to have an even background then. Like a grey screen. Otherwise the photogrammetry software (meshroom) will be confused because the object in front is turning but not the details in the background!

[@mindbreak666]

@@Holocreators thanks for the reply, i'm off to the store to buy some of the greenest fabric available... I have some experience in studio photography and fabrication, trying to get into 3d modeling and printing on my own. This would help a lot.

[@Holocreators]

@@mindbreak666 It doesn't have to be green. Dark grey is good too.

[@inkman6964]

Excellent thank you for taking the time to make this video

[@Holocreators]

thanks mate.

[@Klaas_H]

At 4:58 you use a comma instead of a full stop entering the scaling 10.917. Is that the reason there is an exclamation mark in a triangle box on the right corner of the screen? Very informative video, thanks.

[@Holocreators]

That was an error when typing it in. But i think the software autocorrected.

[@Holocreators]

The exclamation mark has nothing to do with it though. That is a polygon issue

[@berfava]

I had a Galaxy Note 10 which had a ToF sensor (time of flight, similar to a Lidar scanner) , imagine the possibilities if that ToF became mainstream on smartphones

[@Holocreators]

it will take only a short time i think

[@mahmoudjawhar653]

Great Great Great Content and video !!!! ❤️❤️❤️

[@Holocreators]

thank you

[@pcnkeepgoin]

Very nice description. How can I measure the volume of the subject if it’s a part of the body or face? I’m very new to this, thank you.

[@Holocreators]

Hi, when you transform the scan into a solid model, then you will be able to measure the volume. The model needs to be watertight for that. Many programs can do that, i think netfabb has also that functionality.

[@cedricpod]

great stuff indeed .... i plan to try using a programmable rotary table with a robot arm manipulating a DSLR

[@Holocreators]

Sounds great, would love to see that setup. Feel free to send me some pictures when its ready: [e-mail] I want to do a video soon on a robotic arm with a scanner attached.

[@elizabethoommen4115]

Thank u for duch detailing.👌

[@Holocreators]

happy if it was helpful

[@DCDLaserCNC]

Excellent tutorial/info! Thank you for sharing.

[@Holocreators]

thank you :-)

[@nickm2724]

Thanks for the video,very helpful.can you take pics from more than 2 viewpoints and combine via the software ?,thanks again

[@Holocreators]

hi, no you will need at least 60 photos I would recommend, even better 100-200. Two pictures is not enough.

[@nickm2724]

@@Holocreators Hi,thanks for replying,I didn't explain myself properly.I meant from more than two planes ie the first set of 60+ photos at an angle of say 15 degs from the Horizontal the next set of 60+ photos from 30 degs from the horizontal the next set from 45 degs etc. Hopefully that's a bit clearer ? Thanks

[@Holocreators]

@@nickm2724 yes thats a good idea to make the photos from different "planes", I don't know if you can see it in this video but I used about 4 different planes.

[@rodrigomartinsfarias8689]

great work! Whats the method's accuracy?

[@Holocreators]

its really accurate. I would say down to 1mm, which is great for photogrammetry.

[@GlueChickeN10]

Bravo! That's how to sell your service. Teach me and learn me at the same time.

[@Holocreators]

Thank you

[@CascadianBraeden]

What I'd like to know is how to do accurate room-scale 3D scanning (scanning the interior of a room or series of rooms) without having to spend thousands on a specialized device like Leica or Matterport. I got an occipital structure sensor for a few hundred, but the quality I'm lookin for just isn't there. The deviation error can be up to a full inch off, and the iPad memory limits you to about 15 seconds of scanning time before maxing out.

[@Holocreators]

Photogrammetry is not so well suited for room scanning. It can be done, with many individual scans stitched together but its a lot of work. I would highly advise to rent a laser scanner for this task. In Germany you can rent a Faro Focus 70 for 200EUR for one day. Thats enough time to scan an entire house from the inside and the data quality is superb.

[@luisfilipelopes2900]

Well scanning rooms is very difficult, specially in a precise way, since you have to be at multiple distances from the object, and there is little to reference it (like plane wall with no detail). If you try adding markers that appear in multiple images, it will be easier for the software to produce a good model. Markers can be anything from precise dots (white inside, black around) which are perfect, to crosses you can draw on walls, to furtiture (that actually helps as it has form and colours a scanner can corellate). Of course this means setup, and time consuming. This is why you pay money for good scanners that are professionally used, because they accelerate your work and bring you money back. Also by being more precise, you spend less time correcting errors and have a professional work to deliver to your client, or if it's you that are working withe the files, you work with confidence and fast

[@Holocreators]

@@luisfilipelopes2900 I absolutely agree with Luis

[@iheartmysquid]

Couldn't you add a reference object to the scan? like a gaugeblock sitting right beside it.

[@Holocreators]

Yes you can. Great idea. I'll do it next time.

[@Casey-tm6tv]

@@Holocreators something i saw online on someone's setup is that they lined the base of the box with newspaper

[@Holocreators]

@@Casey-tm6tv Thank you, this could help with the registration of the images. also you should always place a ruler in the scan to make scaling easier later on

[@jayinmi3706]

Excellent video. Great detail and thank you. Did this video remind anyone else of BCC? lol

[@Holocreators]

Thank you.

[@imnotok1989]

Can you recommend another method of scaling now that Autodesk killed Netfabb basic?

[@Holocreators]

Hi, is the old version not working any more? github.com/3DprintFIT/netfabb-basic-download/releases

[@UnicornRiderNarresh]

Thanks for the great info. 2 questions 1) Can you suggest any similar workflow for a Model wearing a dress. 2) which software is used for the final slow motion rotation of product. Awaiting reply Thanks for all.

[@Holocreators]

Hi, with a dress it can be much more difficult depending on the fabric, just give it a try. unfortunately I don't remember the software anymore i did the rotation with, almost 2 years ago ;-) but Freecad can do such turntable animations. you just let it turn and run a screen recording tool (OBS) at the same time.

[@UnicornRiderNarresh]

@@Holocreators Thanks for Reply.

[@ammaralkareem490]

Hello there .. thanks for the video it's really good, I would like to asking about the cheapest house scanner... and thank you again

[@Holocreators]

well you could use this technique to also scan a house, otherwise I would recommend laser scanners to scan houses, for example the faro focus

[@luminousfractal420]

So long as my models stay on my computer and aren't collected. 3d models are kinda valuable these days. Also wondering if you could use video frames. Say you take a video and pull every 100th frame and use that as a picture. And would like to see how it compares to Googles augmented reality scanner which a lot of phones are capable of using now.

[@Holocreators]

Yes you can also do photogrammetry from video frames. But I would recommend taking still photos. Much better quality.

[@hallenw]

Have you tried Lidar on newer iPhones or iPads?

[@Holocreators]

yes LIDAR works great, especially for larger parts. This tutorial will work with photos only.

[@imansalam01]

hence on here a month later. thanks for making feel normal again.

[@Holocreators]

Welcome back!

[@mikecoughlin4128]

Would the phone scan be better with the latest multi lens phones? What is the driver, picture resolution?

[@Holocreators]

newer phones have better cameras so yea the quality will improve, for best quality always use dslr cameras

[@nelsondog100]

Very cool! Can it be done using a Mac?

[@Holocreators]

Unfortunately not. Maybe with a different photogrammetry software like reality capture

[@starhawke380]

I have a plastic part for a car I need replaced. It is no longer available new or used. It is the cover for the electric power seat controls. I have one in good condition, I need the one for the other side which is a mirror of the one I have. Can the one I have be scanned, then mirrored and then 3d printed? If so, who can do it for me as I have no intention of getting a 3D printer and being on the ATF watchlist...

[@Holocreators]

You can't get a 3d printer when being on an ATF watchlist? Thats wild. But to answer your question. We can 3d scan your car part, mirror it and send you the files or 3d print it for your. Please send me an email to [e-mail]

[@186scott]

I wish I had found this video when trying to recreate parts for my car that you can't buy as it too me fore ever to try and make the parts by measurements

[@Holocreators]

Yes this can be used for car parts. You have to be really accurate with the reference measurements though.