"If there's ever a Priest in your area, you'd best say your prayers." Nice. I'm an Infantry vet, and while we'd sometimes dust it up with the gun bunnies at the bar, I never forgot "A battery of field artillery is worth a thousand muskets." -William Tecumseh Sherman
@DB-yj3qc6 ай бұрын
In my youthful infantry days, "we" mainly kept on friendly terms with the gun bunnies... they would be running P.T. with 155 training rounds. Great to have your back in a fight.... especially when it was with D.A.T's n scouts or M.P.s. 😂
@johnmcguigan72186 ай бұрын
The artillery was the one branch of the Army (not counting the Army Air Force) that excelled above anything the Axis powers had. Artillery spotting and coordination was excellent, the 155mm Long Tom was unparalleled, and the advent of the proximity fuse at the end of 1944 put our artillery in a class that belonged to the future. Time and again, our ground forces were saved by timely and accurate artillery fire that the Germans couldn't hope to match.
@stuartdollar9912Ай бұрын
I'd say the cutting edge of the Army was that everything worked well together. Infantry had the M1 Garand, which was the best rifle produced in large numbers, and gave squad firepower a big boost. The reliability of the M4 Sherman meant there was going to be a large number of tanks present at the battle. The coordination and firepower of US artillery, and the confidence that it would be there with a fire mission when needed pretty much won a lot of battles. The Germans didn't fear American Armor or Infantry early in the war, but they always feared the artillery. The addition of mobile artillery to Armored Regiments was a huge advantage.
@personalaccount891422 күн бұрын
We had better rifles/carbines (M1 Garand v.s. K98, 6 million M1/M2 carbines v.s. 425,000 STG44), our tanks were superior in numbers, training, survivability, transportability, reliability, maintainability, ergonomics, recoverability, reparability, ease of production, speed, the ability to fire on the move or fire shortly after stopping, rate of fire, communications, armor, until June 1944, and firepower, until June 1944. Our personal equipment was generally better, our rations were better, our Army was fully motorized, our logistics were the best in the world, we had the highest concentration of maintainers and the best trained maintainers, same with recovery personnel, and our communications were superior.
@pauld69676 ай бұрын
You absolutely nailed the motif. 😎 I have long thought the M7 didn't get the attention and love it deserves. Thank you for covering it.
@DougthebearRichards6 ай бұрын
Lot of vehicle for a 105mm weapon, and wasn't particularly good in direct fire against point targets, and didn't have a radio. The M3/M5 light tanks should have been adaptable for the 105mm howitzer role, as the Germans did with the Wespe.
@pauld69676 ай бұрын
@@DougthebearRichards Not having an integral radio would be a drawback if it operated independently but that is not how they were employed doctrinally. Other vehicles received and passed along targeting information to them. As for direct fire, well that isn't their intended role. Howitzers and mortars are designed to do indirect, arcing fire.
@Chilly_Billy6 ай бұрын
Excellent video. Armor and Infantry get most of the glory and history books, but Artillery remains the God of War.
@gsr45356 ай бұрын
Artillery's importance is often overlooked. 👍
@rhietpas6 ай бұрын
Loved the dry sense of humor. Great work
@doughudgens92756 ай бұрын
For brevity, he skipped who did the calculations on which direction and elevation to point the tubes to fire. The howitzer should never see the enemy, the forward observers do. They give a target location, and the Fire Direction Center knows where the battery is located so it can compute the data needed to get rounds on target. I suspect the battery FDC did the calculations and the battalion FDC managed who gets support. They would say infantry company X gets direct support from artillery battery Y. This means the FO with X calls directly to Y’s FDC with targets in need of servicing. One of the US Army’s strengths in WWII was the ability to mass fires from multiple Battalions with very little effort. A division commander could decide he wanted all his artillery to support one objective with their fires. So something like 70-odd tubes of his Division artillery could fire on one target with a few radio calls (assuming all are within range). If Corps Artillery assets were used, you could almost double that number. The mobility of the Priest is what allowed this massing of fires.
@KA-dx2kz6 ай бұрын
The Americans had a priest while the British grabbed a bishop
@hulkkrogan4206 ай бұрын
Smack my bishop!
@Gundoctor913A3 ай бұрын
Wilcox is fantastic at telling these stories and describing these machines! Excellent dry humor, smooth speech and obvious knowledge.
@NMMV_USA3 ай бұрын
Thank You!
@sableliger3275 күн бұрын
ARTILLERY will always be the true KING OF BATTLE.
@elijahschwindt74036 ай бұрын
Love the various vehicles! Looks like they'd be packed in tight. Also, the 40k Rhinos made my day 😊
@brianwynne68356 ай бұрын
Lol I use half tracks in my 40k guard army as open topped chimeras
@Blutgang5 ай бұрын
I like the use of Rhinos in your table talk. Epic choice.
@NMMV_USA4 ай бұрын
Thank your for noticing :)
@davidk73246 ай бұрын
Well done, Mr. Wilcox. Thanks to you and your team.
@philbosworth37896 ай бұрын
Hello again sir. @davidk7324
@davidk73246 ай бұрын
@@philbosworth3789 Hi Phil!
@willardaustin49592 ай бұрын
Being a former member of the 3 battalion 49th FA. Shooting 8" SP Howitzers, I can relate to all of your commentary with a smile on my face. I need to come to your facility and enjoy.
@kevinkelly65246 ай бұрын
This was so informative and educational. Well done
@Kottery6 ай бұрын
Hmmm, those little "Priests" sure look like METAL BAWKSES
@davidlavigne2076 ай бұрын
Excellent descriptions of the M7 and its variants. I also appreciated the breakdown of how the batteries were organized and how they operated during both in offense and defense. The best part was the duties of the crew as described by the host. Artillery in WW2, as it was in WW1 was the largest producer of enemy casualties by far. It was the one arm that the U.S. Army got right overall.
@philbosworth37896 ай бұрын
Hello again @davidlavigne207
@alankjosness20936 ай бұрын
My father was an early draftee because, I think, his secondary schooling in a polytechnic highschool. In early '42 he began learning the trade of artillary observation involving the M7. This was at Camp Roberts in the Mojave Desert. His unit - the 62nd Armored Field Artillary Battalion - boarded ship for North Africa in November 1942. From there the unit travelled through North Africa, Sicily, England, D Day on Omaha Beach, across France, Belgium and into Germany. The M7, (known as the Priest to one of our allies), and her crews, served with destiction throughout the Second World War.
@patrickmcintyre80236 ай бұрын
I just found one of these at the Tennessee National Guard in Union City. I meant to get back to it to take some pictures, but that's going to wait for my next trip out there.
@MagicalMuffin126 ай бұрын
Another great video! Feels conversational and I understood what was going on, which is great since I’m not a history buff!
@thurin846 ай бұрын
this was fascinating. never saw a video about this subject. bravo!
@itsmethelauri11836 ай бұрын
HANS GET MOVING! THE M7 VIDEO IS HERE!
@Legesse_Tefera_fan6 ай бұрын
Incredible video! Looking forward to more fantastic content from your museum
@greymatter68346 ай бұрын
I like the buffalo cap. Good show. 07
@davidholtz65906 ай бұрын
Thank you for a solid understand of M7s.
@ajstephen39776 ай бұрын
Great video and i definitely approve of your hat.
@misterstanley61616 ай бұрын
Great video, super informative and easy to listen to as I was making my breakfast this morning! 😊
@ScottBerrier-ir3pw6 ай бұрын
Look for the Book “Honor Untarnished” by GEN (R) Don Bennett. He commanded a SP Art Bn on D-Day; equipped with the M7 Priest. His chapter on D-Day is a must read for everyone. He was also one of the youngest Bn Commanders during the war. Inspiring leader for sure.
@yannichudziak99426 ай бұрын
Epic rhino’s for the win ;)
@larryselkirk4266 ай бұрын
That you for that overview of the Priest.
@Salamandra40k6 ай бұрын
Jeez you guys need more subscribers. Amazing videos
@Minirafter00026 ай бұрын
Where are the other 7 Hanks for reference? I need to see it fully crewed.
@longrider426 ай бұрын
Yep, we folks living in Wyoming, of which I am one. Are proud of where we live, and we want others, specially those we intend to Un-Alive, to know it :) Yep, SPG's very useful things.
@Sethoates1016 ай бұрын
Great video
@ryanknott75626 ай бұрын
We had one of these in our local park. I grew up playing on it.
@kellywright5405 ай бұрын
My Dad was a scout for the 66th Armored Field Artillery Battalion in Patton's favorite Armored Division, the 4th. I used to think that he was a tanker when I was younger because that's what comes to mind when you think of Patton's Third Army. Needless to say that when I asked him what type of tank he rode around in, he said that he mainly traveled around in a jeep paired up with a tank, which for a kid in grade school sounded pretty boring. Later on I understood the part he played in the 4th Armored Division and as my uncle said, "The whole damn world was at war and there's your Dad, driving around in a jeep, looking for trouble!" He fought in the breakout of Normandy, Northern France, the Ardennes, the Rhineland with a stop at the Buchenwald concentration camps and then into Czechoslovakia at the end of the war.
@Legitpenguins996 ай бұрын
Man, I've found a gold mine with this channel. I hope and think your channel starts to blow up considering there have been a couple of popular videos
@NMMV_USA4 ай бұрын
Welcome aboard!
@TheJimmyplant6 ай бұрын
Wow, the writing is exceptional. Very welld one.
@NMMV_USA4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@sailordude20946 ай бұрын
Thanks, great channel! These were featured in the TV show, The Rat Patrol (as German tanks, lol).
@chrispierdominici38916 ай бұрын
Great stuff, thanks for an interesting and engaging video!
@NMMV_USA6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@robertmorey41046 ай бұрын
Very cool, queen of battle. Artillery. Nice and detailed, well done.
@PavewayJDAM6 ай бұрын
Infantry Queen of Battle. Artillery is KING.
@denverholder23602 ай бұрын
Thanks, very well done!!!
@NMMV_USA2 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@rgriffinRETIRED_SHEEPDOG6 ай бұрын
Great video!
@lyleslaton30866 ай бұрын
Artillery: King of Battle.
@kmoecub6 ай бұрын
Hold on.... Do my eyes spy Warhammer Epic 40K (now Horus Heresy) minis?!
@kalaharimine6 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation. Thank you.
@philbosworth37896 ай бұрын
That was a very informative episode again.
@yoface25376 ай бұрын
Why did the Canadians make the kangaroo, that sounds like an Australian thing
@woodyjm614 ай бұрын
King of Battle
@DB-yj3qc6 ай бұрын
Thanks for a informative video
@thomasmitchell76456 ай бұрын
A very informative video! Thanks to your videos "advertising" the museum, I'll be visiting there this fall. Only one small point. Dice is the plural, die is the singular.
@kellywright5405 ай бұрын
I do have a question, could the gun be lowered enough to be used for direct fire for, let's say, a pillbox or a house?
@matthewrussell94176 ай бұрын
Superb!
@jean-francoislemieux55096 ай бұрын
they did shoot a lot in korea! how long would the barrel survive?
@mearalain30066 ай бұрын
Bien joué. Greetings
@mtstans6 ай бұрын
Great stuff! Was that the same gun that was also used on the 105 sherman dozer?
@robgleadall-cc8gn6 ай бұрын
The Sexton and Kangaroo are actually based on the Canadian Ram tank... A fascinating bit of tank history in itself. Great video I have always found the M3/M4 and it's variants fascinating.
@Thirdbase96 ай бұрын
King of Battle!
@phil20_206 ай бұрын
In the beginning, there was the self-propelled slinger!
@Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll6 ай бұрын
Question, am I aloud to enter the tanks on display without being an employee please answer
@NMMV_USA4 ай бұрын
Generally no. But, a few days a year we have "climb in in a tank day." Follow the FB feed to catch those announcements.
@Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll4 ай бұрын
Also if I were to join the museum/become an employee would I be able to enter it?
@darylnelson30266 ай бұрын
I believe the Canadian Army of World War 2 was the first Army to be fully mechanized .The Saxon was Canadian made , based off the Ram tank chassis that based off the M3 Lee chassis
@DougthebearRichards6 ай бұрын
The Birch Gun comes to mind long before the M7 Priest.
@nickraschke47376 ай бұрын
US war history..never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
@VintageWanderer6 ай бұрын
How heavy was each complete shell?
@lil_tequito6 ай бұрын
What were casualties like in this field? I’d imagine later in the war the rate must’ve been pretty low as they weren’t retreating all too much
@JENKEM10006 ай бұрын
Towards the end, he contrasts the US HMCs that were used for mainly indirect fire, with direct-fire assault guns such as StuG and SU-122... completely ignoring the soviet "triplex artillery" concept that the SU-122 fit into. Soviet SPGs of that era were not just assault guns, they did plenty of indirect fire missions as well, in addition to being an antitank weapon.
@curtisbryce50966 ай бұрын
Weren't the majority of military deaths caused by artillery and mortar fire?
@Chilly_Billy6 ай бұрын
Not among submarine crews. 😉😆
@maxstr6 ай бұрын
Still is
@curtisbryce50966 ай бұрын
@@Chilly_Billy Wasn't depth charges and the famous Hedgehog a naval form of mortars?
@richardmeyeroff73976 ай бұрын
I suggest that you slow your delivery it will allow the people listening to better follow what you are saying.
@kmoecub6 ай бұрын
Forgive me Father, for I have sinned. Forgive them not, for they have done far worse.
@craigmorris40836 ай бұрын
Sorry, but I believe it was logistics that won the war.
@chelseachelseaboy6 ай бұрын
Sorry...did I hear you say America was the first to have mechanized artillery ....didn't the Germans have Wespe & Hummel ??
@stephenbritton92976 ай бұрын
No, logistics won the war.
@stevenyouel86146 ай бұрын
He makes a claim that the US was the first country in the world "to mechanized their artillery." Germans used their own self-propelled artillery in the Battle of France 1940 (Bison sig 33 using a 15 cm infantry gun on panzer 1 chassis).
@itsmethelauri11836 ай бұрын
That’s crazy, I’ve seen a lot of pictures of horses dragging German artillery through just about all parts of the war. Don’t know if I’d call that “fully mechanized” but hey, I’m not the one working at a museum.
@chelseachelseaboy6 ай бұрын
Wespe & Hummel as well.
@davidk73246 ай бұрын
Interesting. Wikipedia indicates that just 38 of these were produced by the Nazis and they were last deployed in 1943. Horses (~2.5 million) remained widely used for transport by the Germans throughout the war, I believe.
@johnfrench12396 ай бұрын
Slooooooow down buddy! Good content but exhausting to listen to!
@videodistro6 ай бұрын
Actually it was nice not to have to run at 1.25 speed. A little more white space can be nice, but the pace didn't waste my time, either.
@2serveand2protect6 ай бұрын
PS. GREAT STUFF! Thank You for uploading! ;) :)
@2serveand2protect6 ай бұрын
What do you mean by "BASE" charge ?? ...as in "BASE-BLEED" or just "BASE" as "REGULAR" ?? ...and what the hell's a "25-pounder" ?? What caliber would that be??
@2serveand2protect6 ай бұрын
Gotta give it t the Americans! ...while 70-80 % of the "pack" of the German artillery was still relying on HORSES (even by '44) - and the same went for the Soviets ... Americans had EVERYTHING (100%) MOTORIZED! The vehicle in itself might not look as something particularily "great" ...but it gives you a good idea about how much POWERFUL the "industrial muscle" of the US Army was!