How Britain’s judicial system is being enriched out of all recognition by immigration

Principles of British law dating back a thousand years are being abandoned as a direct consequence of immigration to the United Kingdom.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_...

[@taffyterrier]

Muslim sensibilities are creeping into court judgments. When 86 year old British war veteran Frank Fishwick died after being punched in the face by a 19 year old Syrian refugee when the old man requested him to stop smoking weed in the stairwell of his Preston flats the judge commented in mitigation that the old man had called the Syrian racist names which provoked the punch and reduced his sentence to just four years in a young offender’s institution. British children used to be taught that sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. That time honoured principle no longer applies in multicultural Britain.

[@AngelBaby-cp6kf]

I see my comment got deleted, so I'll just say that the death of an old man has little meaning today. OK.

[@gary637]

And mine.

[@photoisca7386]

The language used every weekend in London by foreign invaders is pretty offensive to people who do not agree with the mob. It's just that KhanForce has an original translation for what they say.

[@stephfoxwell4620]

And mine

[@paulnolan1352]

Along with so many other principles unfortunately.

[@rogernightly9097]

I wonder what this country would be like now if the Government of the day has listened to Enoch.

[@anneheard9381]

Wonderful

[@vordman]

A damn sight better. And EVERYONE knows it.

[@enzed6498]

​@vordman Bugger , you stole my thunder, that is what I was going to say. Great minds think alike.

[@freeatlast.]

British Leyland? 😂

[@tonygyles7351]

It was a black day when double jeopardy law was removed.

[@lefuedebout]

.... " black " is the operative word here!

[@ianclark2534]

Knee jerk reaction of appeasement without much thought to the broader principal. Apex of a slippery slope!

[@davidholland8047]

www.cps.gov.uk/stories/mcgrory-double-jeopardy I am glad that he went to prison.

[@theenglishman8668]

Perhaps OJ Simpson would have been found guilty.🤔

[@georgeamery]

I believe the Americans still have their double jeopardy law.

[@davidreynolds6477]

The fall of this country is like the fall of the Roman Empire on steroids

[@tappym9141]

It's worse. We now have a massive enemy within.

[@davidreynolds6477]

@@tappym9141 correct and the political class knew what was happening and did nothing that’s called treason

[@Epicgeezer]

@@davidreynolds6477 follow the chi chin 💰 💰 always corrupt people involved

[@quantisedspace7047]

​@@davidreynolds6477Are you referring to the Roman Empire or to Britain ?

[@jerribee1]

We gave them a legal system. They give us the law of the jungle.

[@HaleyChain-vw8rr]

If only that was all you gave them you might have had a case , pun intended,

[@Daisyworld743]

They gave us Humza Useless.

[@christinerussell113]

​@HaleyChain-vw8rr Quite right, we gave them a great deal more, in fact literally the modern world they now get to live in. Following on from the Industrial revolution, Science, technology, medicine, infrastructure, including the railway, plus a whole host of innovations that had their origins in Britain and now benefit the whole world.

[@manofkent4472]

Simon is looking it the wrong way. Hamza is right, it will save a vast amount of court time and money. Think about appointing a judge from the same ethnic group as the defendants in Rochdale gang cases etc etc, 'No case to answer - dismissed - next' .

[@christinerussell113]

@@Overkill-. Maybe because it is those two groups who are the problem, unless of course your main complaint is reserved for just the one religion.

[@divinaluz69]

So Humza is already trying to destroy the rights of Scottish people to align the country with how his homeland operates. Is anyone surprised?

[@MrEdrftgyuji]

I would like to see him try pushing his rainbow laws in his home country.

[@youtubeyoutube936]

It’s done to undermine society

[@alanmarr3323]

The man is foolish to alienate the Greens. SCotland is a country with the greatest potential for Green energy in Europe !

[@peteratkinson922]

​@@alanmarr3323Very easy to alienate

[@carlsummers2316]

​@@MrEdrftgyuji He's only pushing them here for soppy left wing votes

[@djscoah8037]

Can anyone, anyone at all, genuinely and honestly aver that “society” is better for having millions from overseas share our oxygen?

[@georgemather9082]

Yeah but thinks of the kebabs

[@niptodstan]

Enoch tried to warn us. But as we now see. He was right.

[@dianelopes8199]

hell no .

Rishi Sunak, Humza Yousaf and Kier Starmer.

[@terencephillips6833]

Tony Blair.

[@johnwells7001]

We'd all b happier with Useless back in Pakistan where he could help liberate women .

[@raychambers3646]

He got his mob back pretty sharpish ,

[@englishpatriot9464]

He insists he will not quit apparently 😂

[@captainplatinum]

Everything has been decimated . Every standard , tradition and organisation has been “ enriched “

[@Occident.]

Oy vey.

[@user-ys8pq5vd3s]

Every. Single. Time. But, idiots STILL protect Them and their brothers and allies from the religion of p1ss.

[@peterlatham8165]

Echoes of Orwell?

[@thomasrobert4654]

if nobody fears you then you are nobody and nothing and anybody can treat you with utter contempt which is what they are doing every day

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Eskimos again.

[@nosotrosloslobosestamosreg4115]

You cannot vote yourselves out of this. Those reluctant to defend themselves using violence have already lost.

[@eadweard.]

You've lost even if you do.

[@user-ys8pq5vd3s]

​@eadweard. There's a word for your sort and that word is Coward.

[@user-ys8pq5vd3s]

Too many can only fight over invaders in shorts, kicking a ball and showering together.

[@Jeremy-ho3vi]

We know whos side the Tanks will be on.

[@user-ys8pq5vd3s]

@@eadweard. Really? I take it you're a homosexual who will only "fight" over who's arse he can attack next?

[@Lensman864]

If you find a Hedgehog with no ticks then let it go about its business. If you find a Hedgehog with so many ticks that they are draining its blood to the point of death then eliminate the ticks and build a local tick barrier. Hedgehogs are noble and ancient animals that must be preserved and protected!

[@TP-om8of]

Hedgehogs are institutionally racist.

[@yiguanas812]

But the ticks are needed in order to control the Hedgehog with trauma-based mind control, and brainwash it.

[@robm8809]

Red Squirrels also deserve protection.

[@stephfoxwell4620]

Ticks have rights too.

[@yiguanas812]

@@stephfoxwell4620 But only Sir Keir Starmer should get to decide 1. what those rights are and 2. which ticks get them! 🙂

[@coastliner5848]

Took the oath in Urdu & attends functions in Pakistani national dress - what a joke of a country this place is.

[@danielward7008]

Yeah, that's exactly what they think.

[@TPT6148]

Yes, he's as Scottish as a Chicken Biryiani!

[@williamtell6750]

That he heads the Scottish National Party adds insult to injury.

[@thelastofus2872]

All with the blessing of the traitor crown.

[@thomasrobert4654]

no the country is sound but its menfolk are suspect the same as the menfolk of england wales and ireland are.

[@longyx321]

Any other mothers of murder victims given a Peerage? Humsa Yousless, days are hopefully numbered. SNP are crumbling...

[@martynspooner5822]

Not the man who took the highest office in Scotland in a foreign language and dressed in the cultural attire of a foreign country, so sad for your loss.

[@Walesktf]

If anything, the parents of Lee Rigby need Peerages

[@bernardedwards8461]

@@martynspooner5822 He hoped to add Scotland to the Pakistani Empire, but it doesn't look as though he will succeeed.

[@TJspaceman]

@@Walesktfwhy?

[@tonylaverick7865]

@@TJspaceman You are in A1 trolling mood today, Space Creature.

[@ireneforward8115]

No jury ? Well it will be easier for those of evil intent , to " persuade " just one judge , instead 12 good jurors .

[@anneheard9381]

Of course thats the idea

[@chrisc626]

unless you are Tommy R who has never had the privilege of a trial by jury.

[@geordiewishart1683]

There are 15 in a jury in criminal trials in Scotland

[@patt6246]

Thanks to the state of the education system it’s extremely unlikely you’ll find twelve people capable of following a trial and coming to an independent conclusion.

[@richardenders6606]

@ireneforward8115 - Pakistani politics, just vote them all out of office, it hardly seems credible that you had one SNP leader facing sexual abuse charges, two more arrested for suspected fraud, the current one trying to impose Sharia law with a suspected drug=dealing brother, and all of them intent on turning Scotland into a basket case What happened to a great nation?

[@stumccabe]

The jury system is there to protect an accused man of being found guilty by a politically biased or otherwise biased or incompetent judge. It also confers legitimacy to the verdict since it is the decision of his peers. It is absolutely essential to a fair justice system.

[@sye601]

The problem is when you don't have a homogenous society you actually allow bias to infiltrate the system. If an 'Asian' grooming gang had a jury which was majority 'Asian' what do you think is likely to happen? Also can we be sure a jury cannot be rigged by the person who sends out the invites (looking at the Edward colston statue case I sometimes wonder).

[@TJspaceman]

Both has flaws. Are you saying juries cannot be biased? You're naive

[@tonylaverick7865]

Unfortunately that didn't work with Sam Melia.

[@ronmatthews1738]

A number of countries have abandoned jury trials. Generally the argument is that it is to guard against bias. If one looks at the way anyone accused of any crime against Islam is treated in Pakistan, it seems unlikely that anyone would be able to get a fair trial for such offences. And this is the way our country has gone with the police and justice system kow-towing to any group that is willing to take to the streets or use violence to protect themselves against the consequences of the law. The Stephen Lawrence case can be seen as a bellwether for a fundamental change in our society.

[@stumccabe]

@@TJspaceman I didn't say that! Sure juries can be biased too but they aren't as subject to direct political interference as judges.

[@Occident.]

We are occupied. The people of these islands are no longer in control of our own destiny . Its in the hands of people who hate us.

[@--jan--]

​@@ianxyoutubeso you blame western people that till now were living in a safe western country that they are not prepared to deal with the shit that is linked to third world extreme violence, crime and low trust societies. I am sorry but the succes of western societies is thanks to high trust and safety!!! We should protect it by any means.

[@ohno467]

It is weird to live in the side effect of ww2, a war in which whites lost

[@robm8809]

Fact.

[@raychambers3646]

If they want to free plastercine can't they go and help ?

[@geordiewishart1683]

Occident, do you include yourself as an occupier? The papist Irish hate the Protestant British yet here you are, living amongst us

[@christiandupille3690]

Someone being given a position for how they look not on their ability is a terrible idea

[@TP-om8of]

That’s how news presenters and actresses are selected.

[@stephfoxwell4620]

What about King Charles III? Given the throne based on a tenuous dna link with several medieval philanderers and murderers.

[@carlsummers2316]

​@@stephfoxwell4620 The same will be said of William or George. How are they responsible for ancestors behaviour?. This is the first time I've ever disagreed with anything you've posted. However none of us can take responsibility for past generations. For Christ's sake, we are constantly being hit over the head as colonial, racist, slavers for shit that happened 200 years ago

[@christiandupille3690]

@@stephfoxwell4620 The biggest thing to worry about with Chuck is his friendship with a bloke called Klaus

[@stephfoxwell4620]

@@carlsummers2316 I said nothing about Charles being responsible for his ancestor's actions. The OP was about appointment not on merit. I pointed out the tenuous reason Monarchs get precedence. Make line primogeniture usually. Though we ousted our legitimate royals in 1689 after the Dutch invasion.

[@bushwhackeddos.2703]

We are done, my only hope is we take the people responsible with us.

[@Jen-mf9rm]

Definitely going out fighting,

[@johntooth1886]

This once pleasant land.

[@Occident.]

You just need to name those responsible.

[@ohno467]

The degree of change in the last 30 years is staggering , its what you get when you fight for small hats i guess

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Eskimos.

[@anneheard9381]

WHY ONLY STEVEN LAWRENCE. Many people have been murdered 😡😡

[@englishpatriot9464]

Oh and Saint Kaba, remember that one?

[@vordman]

Because he's the only blk they can find who was killed (allegedly) by whites. The irony they have to go back more than thirty years to find such a crime seems to have escaped them.

[@angelamary9493]

Excactly ! How many White kids are stabbed to death by non whites ..

[@paulmoore120]

I am sick of hearing about Stephen Lawrence and his mother. Have we forgotten about Lee Rigby and the three people killed in Nottingham to name just a few.

[@robm8809]

Kriss Donald too, and there have been many others, as you say.

[@karyne826]

There’s a designated Stephen Lawrence Day too I believe.

[@paulmoore120]

@@karyne826 disgraceful.

[@stanleywoodison8699]

The old girl certainly did well out of the murder.

[@chieftandriver703]

It started with the McPherson Report demanding that the idea of double jeopardy be discarded. That went to satisfy the demand for ‘justice’ for Stephen Lawrence after his parents foolishly and against legal advice launched a private prosecution against the suspects that they lost. In order to get the result they wanted a 1000 yr old principle was binned off. The McPherson report wasn’t just an attack on the police. It was a complete undermining of the British way of life, law and heritage People just didn’t see it as that Suddenly the ‘hate’ laws came into being. The police were ‘discouraged’ from stop and search resulting in the knife crime we see today Hate crimes morphed into ‘religious hate crimes’ that started straying into private homes and private conversations. And once one hate law is brought into being another one pops up as one group decide they are more important than another It then spirals. And the police begin to throw procedures out of the window against certain groups (see Tommy Robinson) and other groups act with impunity because they believe they have every right to act in any way they see fit The arrival of alien cultures, alien beliefs and alien heritage in any organisation is met with resentment and in some cases out and out hostility. The only way the host can react is by rejecting the invasive organism and that requires laws to keep the host in line We are at that stage

[@johnjc4645]

You mentioned Tommy Robinson he has had more injustice thrown at him than most people and if you notice no jury

[@peterdavis3210]

Great comment. I think 'hate' crimes first came in with the Race Relations Act of 1968. Dreadful then dreadful now. 'Hate' is subjective, we have plenty of objective laws. Macpherson also redefined a racist incident: ‘A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person.’ And institutional racism as: 'The collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.' Writing in the Telegraph, a year after the publication of the report, Tom Utley commented that Macpherson had “blood on his hands”, because the police did not dare to stop and search for fear of being branded racist. Utley was right, Mapherson was wrong.

[@derepentlestranger]

I just had an interesting idea, history does not repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes, do you remember a bit of a bother way back then referred to as the Magna Carta?

[@LW-no9sm]

Hamas Useless is a f-ing disaster. At his core is, as with Sadiq Khan, the full introduction of Sharia Law. Why these 2 characters are tolerated is astounding.

[@imsbvs]

hopefully Kahn's days as Mayor are numbered ... to be voted out at the upcoming election.

[@peterteagleteagle9958]

It's all about money, and denieing the average man in the street, justice

[@clachan24]

What is not all about money?

[@robertaustin6940]

It's about the slow destruction of White people, their culture, their heritage and future. The globalist elite are responsible and many of them live in the UK.

[@deborahking914]

Magna Carta 'tried by our peers of 12 good men and true 'trial by jury must stay

[@johntooth1886]

Yes

[@frankielov]

Uk going back to the Dark Ages.

[@iandougall7169]

I think it was actually better in the dark ages in some ways!

[@rosanneshinkle4133]

I think many Western nations are marching backward in time.

[@guser7137]

It's worse. What they are doing, and they know it is setting precedent. It is completely breaking the legal system.

[@Bellicosy]

and they have to trample over previous precedents in order to set new ones. It's awful in so many ways. I'm at a loss for words.

[@maxpaws3977]

Caribbean and South Asian immigration into UK has definitely been the worst in UK history for a diverse number of reasons.

[@johntooth1886]

Spot on.

[@Occident.]

The first lot, Simon's favourite bunch have done the most damage.

[@markmorrid8144]

​@@Occident. Europa the last battle explains a lot.

[@englishpatriot9464]

1948 😐😐

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Eskimos again eh ?

[@ericbrown7297]

There should be no changes to the British legal system. If ‘Useless’ wants non jury trials, may I suggest he retires to another country where that is the law.

[@newadam573]

Cameron's "we should integrate with the migrants" principle is coming into practice.

[@markmorrid8144]

The heir to blair ...treasonous bustards.

[@markmorrid8144]

The heir to blair both treasonous bastards.

[@takeapictureitlllastlonger5768]

When the "Law" becomes an ass it is my duty to ignore it. Common law or nothing for me.

[@chuckmaddison2924]

I'm white, I'm right.

[@angelamary9493]

Well said 👍

[@johnl5316]

Thank goodness these changes are not possible in the USA, at least

[@hansemannluchter643]

🤣🤣

[@jerribee1]

Really? Look up New York judge Abena Darkeh, who recently stated, " The second amendment does not exist in my courtroom."

[@Jen-mf9rm]

​@@jerribee1I was going to cite that case too. That dude has been totally stitched up

[@trevorrussell487]

Does it mean an eye for an eye? Bring back the law before it's too late.

[@carolramsey6287]

We now actually have laws which only apply to and are only enforced against those of indigenous origin. These crimes include what we think or might think about doing, regardless of what we have actually done. The prosecution can also produce in evidence possession of items which it is lawful to possess and all sorts of inneuendo in political trials which would never have been tolerated in criminal trials when I was prosecuting cases a few short years ago

[@alunhuang-wright3030]

As was the case in the Melia trial earlier this year which Simon mentioned in a recent video.

[@johnjc4645]

We have be had these onesided laws since about 19666 when the labour government brought in the race relations law

[@divinaluz69]

Minority Report.

[@robm8809]

Well said, Carol.

[@carolramsey6287]

@@robm8809 What also concerns me is that merely watching videos by commentators not approved by the authorities or deemed to be politically unacceptable or expressing approval of their views may soon be enough to bring the ever watching thought police to ones door.

[@MarkOffski]

if Humza Useless wants to start having trials without jury for RP victims, how about we start with the GR gangs?, or maybe that might be a bit Awkward for him..

[@flashboult1]

My father was in south Yorkshire CID in the 70s,the worst crimes he dealt with were committed by blacks even though in those days they were super minorities .After the CID we had a pub called The east house ,2 years before an African had shot dead 3 white men in there and injured 2 others.I remember as a child that there were still bullet holes in the front window.😑

[@gbentley8176]

Look to South Africa now and see the UK tomorrow.

[@Occident.]

Same in the Northeast. Google the "Torso in the tank case".

[@GreggFellows]

Peter Sutcliffe disagrees with you

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@GreggFellows Mate of your`s was he ?

[@GreggFellows]

@@clemobenoit5813 yeah, he was your dad

[@eggyboy123]

Why not do away with courts of justice and let the police do it all. Judge Dredd is getting closer

[@sicks6six]

JUDGE DREDD has the answer, let him serve justice,

[@gregabott5583]

I'd suggest the removal of jury trials is so that judges can choose to not convict people who it would be beneficial to not convict, to allow the prison numbers to become more 'representative'.

[@Curmudgeonist]

Try taking the Clapham omnibus these days!

[@theprincipalofficer4273]

The only thing I agree on is you don’t need a jury for Muslims they are guilty by default.

[@brummierabbitman9637]

This is what your ancestors died for folks

[@dunkirk1581]

Abandon jury trails for grape, YET , if your under 25 and a member of humza's gang, NO TRAIL THEY GET COMMUNITY SERVICE to stop filling up the prisons.

[@DavidGirling]

Given how many times he has been in court and jailed, how many trials by jury has Tommy Robinson had? (Hint: the number is less than one.) Yet Just Stop Oil protesters who have filmed themselves damaging things get acquitted by a jury. That tells you all you need to know about British justice over the past 25 years.

[@blueband8114]

I agree Simon, getting rid of a trial by Jury is an absolutely horrendous idea.

[@gavinbissell8847]

I've seen an advertisement for magistrates in Leicester, no education or experience required with the objective of "representation".

[@BillSikes.]

Its the height of naivety to expect Enlightenment principles and insights to arise from an islamic Mind

[@jesusjohnny8286]

It is a tragedy for what was a great, free way of life. Squandered by complacency. We've let our fathers down.

[@anneheard9381]

I cant understand why the mother was given a peerage. It still isnt good enough

[@johnbrereton5229]

Proper trial by jury should be increased and restored to it original purpose, not abandoned altogether. It's a part of our democratic process which allows the common man to judge not only his contemporaries but the law itself.

[@maxpaws3977]

UK judge's deciding on verdicts is a terrible idea. UK Judges are always very biased and even often unsound in their decision making. Jury trials must always be a thing.

[@thelastofus2872]

Most are paid off and corrupt and all go to the same clubs as their paymasters

[@englishpatriot9464]

Chris Kaba court case comes to mind...

[@robm8809]

​@englishpatriot9464 Sam Melia's case too.

[@englishpatriot9464]

@@robm8809 👏👏

[@deangdmppajj4692]

Personally I find trial by media more frightening

[@englishpatriot9464]

I wonder if that's what influenced the judge that sent the firearms officer to jail that shot Saint Kaba

[@TPT6148]

Immigration, the gift that keeps on taking!

[@mattmatt7934]

,, Take now, pay later?,, ✌

[@kevinobrien4550]

You forgot the lottery size win payments dear old Doreen was given aswell as her peerage.

[@d.d.4703]

Simon, the Steven Lawrence case had nothing to do with the change of the double jeopardy rule. It came about from a case of a young woman murdered by her boyfriend, acquitted at trial, after which further evidence was found. The new law was retrospective, and he was convicted in a second trial. In the 1950's there was a case of a man who was who acquitted of murdering his business partner. He then sold the story to a newspaper of how he killed the man and what it felt like, knowing he could not be tried again, even for a confession. The change in the law brings better justice for victims. What's wrong with a retrial if new evidence emerges. It cannot be argued that it permits the police to present a 'sloppy' case; there was no CPS to get past in Norman times.

[@Rose-zw2oe]

Well I see why now of course there will have been some change since 1066.I think originally it was to stop unfounded rumours that could result in treachery +dark deeds .Seemingly 1066 was a time when such things where commonly practiced. I think they where in a period where laws where actually changing quite a lot .Much different to the system that it interprets today. Best wishes to all 🌹

[@user-jh8mo1gx6l]

This situation was completely foreseeable. Their failure to assimilate and the failure of Britons to require respect for British values while allowing millions to enter has given license to those who now demand their will be done! What will western nations do to protect their culture and traditions is the question that must be answered if they wish to retain what they have created.

[@Must_not_say_that]

It is appalling. And by the way if he took his oath in Urdu that is not valid since justice must also be seen to be done and we cannot see what he is saying. It is absurd that English, the legal language of thie UK, is shoved by in that way. The authorities are lawless.

[@robm8809]

Well said.

[@fedmcglowie7240]

When has emulating Pakistan ever been good news for women?

[@bozoclown99]

The systematic dismantling of the justice system is happening all over the world, but it's especially acute in England. It is all headed towards the dystopian police state.

[@EvenBigger-Brother]

The employee who worked for the Forensic Science Service and then for the Metropolitan Police.Forensic Scientist Acquitted of Misconduct in Public Office. will she now face a retrial ?

[@geordiewishart1683]

Schedule of Qualifying Offences for Retrial of Serious Offences:List of offences for England and Wales Offences Against the Person Murder: Murder Attempted murder: An offence under section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (c. 47) of attempting to commit murder Soliciting murder: An offence under section 4 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (c. 100) Manslaughter: Manslaughter Kidnapping: Kidnapping Sexual Offences Rape: An offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (c. 69) or section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (c. 42) Attempted rape: An offence under section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 of attempting to commit an offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 or section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Intercourse with a girl under thirteen: An offence under section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 Incest by a man with a girl under thirteen: An offence under section 10 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 alleged to have been committed with a girl under thirteen Assault by penetration: An offence under section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (c. 42) Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent: An offence under section 4 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that the activity caused involved penetration within subsection (4)(a) to (d) of that section Rape of a child under thirteen: An offence under section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Attempted rape of a child under thirteen: An offence under section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (c. 47) of attempting to commit an offence under section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Assault of a child under thirteen by penetration: An offence under section 6 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Causing a child under thirteen to engage in sexual activity: An offence under section 8 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that an activity involving penetration within subsection (2)(a) to (d) of that section was caused Sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice: An offence under section 30 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that the touching involved penetration within subsection (3)(a) to (d) of that section Causing a person with a mental disorder impeding choice to engage in sexual activity: An offence under section 31 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where it is alleged that an activity involving penetration within subsection (3)(a) to (d) of that section was caused Drugs Offences Unlawful importation of Class A drug: An offence under section 50(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2) alleged to have been committed in respect of a Class A drug (as defined by section 2 of the Misuse of Drugs Act1971 (c. 38)) Unlawful exportation of Class A drug: An offence under section 68(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 alleged to have been committed in respect of a Class A drug (as defined by section 2 of the Misuse of Drugs Act1971) Fraudulent evasion in respect of Class A drug: An offence under section 170(1) or (2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2) alleged to have been committed in respect of a Class A drug (as defined by section 2 of the Misuseof Drugs Act 1971 (c. 38)) Producing or being concerned in production of Class A drug: An offence under section 4(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 alleged to have been committed in relation to a Class A drug (as defined by section 2 of that Act) Criminal Damage Offences Arson endangering life: An offence under section 1(2) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c. 48) alleged to have been committed by destroying or damaging property by fire Causing explosion likely to endanger life or property: An offence under section 2 of the Explosive Substances Act 1883 (c. 3) Intent or conspiracy to cause explosion likely to endanger life or property: An offence under section 3(1)(a) of the Explosive Substances Act 1883 War Crimes and Terrorism Genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes: An offence under section 51 or 52 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions: An offence under section 1 of the Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (c. 52) Directing terrorist organisation: An offence under section 56 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (c. 11) Hostage-taking: An offence under section 1 of the Taking of Hostages Act 1982 (c. 28) Conspiracy Conspiracy: An offence under section 1 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (c. 45) of conspiracy to commit an offence listed in this Part of this Schedule

[@EvenBigger-Brother]

@@geordiewishart1683 Reported as you are not allowed to copy and paste from gov.uk

[@kevinobrien4550]

And then instal more and more of his mates on the bench to deal with rape, grooming and assault cases against women. Job done.

[@ant1010]

Time ago jury's not only judged the accused but could also judge the law they were being prosecuted under.

[@sunnyclimes4884]

I always wondered why she was made a Baroness.

[@valeriegrimshaw1365]

This country is split in 2 and one side is beating on the other using the manipulated law and the police...even though the thugs doing the beating are mainly in the wrong.

[@PedrSion]

First Minister, for now…

[@normansidey5258]

Hopefully, but can the electorate’s votes be fairly counted, or will Yousef and his cronies find some way to stay in power. It is of serious concern and the election needs to be watched very carefully.

[@MarleneWalker-su8ku]

The problem is ourselves , if you allow people to impose their preferences for how things should be done, with no respect for yours then they will.The only way to insure you are treated fairly and not abused is to return the favour . Always treat others the way they treat you.Treat immigrants to this country in exactly the same way they would treat you in their country.Give absolutely nothing to those that would give you nothing, give no respect to those that give you no respect.Oppose any government and any attempt to steal your money and what is yours or your communities to give to anyone else that hasn't earned it.

[@garytaylor6382]

I still find it hard to believe that dome of our own people actually want us destroyed, i can honestly say i never saw this coming

[@sye601]

Are they our own people? dig a little deeper you might find many have roots which would require a review of their perceived allegiance.

[@Occident.]

Those of own people doing it, are bought and paid for by the Occupiers.

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Eskimos then ?

[@feliksj.kwiatkowski2935]

The original Lawrence murder trial was , from memory, a hard-left political demarche, after a private prosecution brought upon inadequate evidence. Further , the abolition of autrefois acquit was not the first time the English twisted their laws to appease the blacks - that was the abolition of 'sus' .

[@mrmiller7627]

Also saying turbans were as good as a crash helmet

[@MrFIZZYMann]

The Whip Hand is Growing Stronger 😈 & More Vicious by Each Action 👿

[@starlightbreaker561]

and the rubbing of hands intensifies

[@Yazz2014]

In America the glaring proof of why jury systems should be seriously looked into is the OJ Simpson trial, one of the jury (black woman) admitted that they acquitted him because of “payback” for the Rodney King incident and because the victims were white. Even though the whole world knew this, it was still a shock to see the callousness of this woman decades later, it is clear that she would do the same thing again. It’s obvious that the same thing is happening in the UK. One of the jury system’s tenet is based on being judged by a jury of your peers but in a multicultural world a case that involves different ethnicities will almost always end up in acquittals. THAT IS NOT JUSTICE

[@jona826]

To play devil's advocate here just a little bit, we had no-jury trials in Northern Ireland during "The Troubles" because of jurors being routinely intimidated and threatened by paramilitary groups rather than anything to do with immigration. These no-jury trials in Northern Ireland were widely condemned at the time, it should be said.

[@tappym9141]

Exactly. Now we have these positions filled, more & more by those who are doing the intimidating. Same principle.

[@Parawingdelta2]

It's beginning to sound very much like Sharia law.

[@sandyrobertson]

Why can't Tommy Robinson ever get a jury trial?

[@GreggFellows]

Magistrate

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@GreggFellows Imagine a leroy in charge of his trial....

[@GreggFellows]

@@clemobenoit5813 keep making the racist comments mate, it will be likes of you that close this channel, comments are already getting hit

[@Goat-8080]

The left want as many of these 'sailors' here as possible, both groups have the same interest in the 'young' 😉 This is why the legal system is manipulated to keep them here!

[@david1964.]

Your favourite theme. 😉

[@Goat-8080]

@@david1964. Pointing out wrong 'uns? Correct, but I can see why you would be upset about it "David" 😉 😂

[@david1964.]

In fact, you like this theme so much you went back to your comment and expanded it. 😀Did you enjoy Mr Webb's recent article about the "good old days"?

[@simondjangothe4349]

@@david1964.I thought you had an “interest in the young”. Remind me of the subject being discussed when you wrote “the younger the better”.

[@david1964.]

@@simondjangothe4349 Hang on, Simon - you're being sneaky with your quotation marks. If you want to suggest that I said both of those things, I shall threaten you with lawyers (as Mr Webb said he would do in the infamous plagiarism case).

[@seansmith445]

It's not just your Chanel that is having comments turned off it is happening on other channels too.

[@GTE-gn4ww]

In a few months the SNP leader may very well be questioned by the police over his conduct and donations to the Palestinian cause.These exits are almost always a pre cursor to future events that are anticipated.

[@Tensquaremetreworkshop]

Not only did they remove double jeopardy - they made it retrospective! Reminds me of the Labour party, which once told people to stop doing something, because they intended to make it illegal- and retrospective. There is law- and there is justice; often different.

[@kenirving5240]

Having done Jury service, I am utterly convinced that jury trials are far removed from any sense of justice. We had one overbearing idiot who declared himself chairman, insisted we vote immediately and wouldn’t allow any further discussion. One of the cases was an industrial death trial, and 4 of the jurors had never worked a day in their lives and had no idea whatsoever what was going on. They literally decided on going with the majority, however that should go.

[@karyne826]

Having done jury service twice. I disagree.

[@kenirving5240]

@@karyne826 That's fair enough. We had different experiences clearly.

[@karyne826]

@@kenirving5240 I think that highlights the benefit of our jury system. Differing views.

[@archiebald4717]

In fact he did not take the oath. When asked if he swore allegiance to the king, he did not reply.

[@archiebald4717]

@@One2ThreeIV Are you planning to be First Minister?

[@ant7936]

All those wonderful noir films of the 40/50s are redundant now - the villain can be tried again and again, and doesn't escape justice!

[@Tony11806]

Britain's and Europe's fate was already sealed at the beginning of WW2.

[@Occident.]

The money power has shafted us all.

[@malicant123]

At least Churchill had his debts paid....

[@evolassunglasses4673]

We are occupied by Usury. All our problems are just symptoms of that, unfortunately.

[@Walesktf]

We supported the wrong side in WWII

[@yiguanas812]

...and at the beginning of WW3.

[@geert574]

From France With Love 😏

[@raypurchase801]

Beaucoup love back to you, friend. Our governments despise us.

[@Occident.]

Greetings from occupied England. 👋

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Israel would make UK a better place..

[@jayturner3397]

Enriched is another word in danger of becoming meaningless through misuse 😮

[@patricka.crawley6572]

A.I. will end up as judge and jury.

[@hkmonaro8153]

It's just been announced here in Australia that the next census won't ask people here what ethnicity they are, the government doesn't want Aussies to realise that we're already the minority in our own country with there seeming to be at least 10 indians to every 1 Australian, hence why it's now a total shthole..

[@markdaniels2200]

He probably won’t be there next week, fingers crossed…🤞

[@davidgavin7280]

We should rejoice at our enrichment. Oh how lucky we are.

[@ashjitsu]

No one as ever heard of Kriss Donald...I wonder why ?

[@NeetLurker]

"Believe all women" I suppose? Crazy.

[@abazely2743]

Social justice,critical theory,identity politics etc. have replaced common sense.

[@richardhockey8442]

Hamza 'soon to be unemployed' Useless isn't going to be in any position to set policy or change the law very shortly

[@drybokes7055]

Scottish Labour leader is Anas Sarwar. Or Humza 2.0. He will be the next First Minister of Scotland.

[@wjf0ne]

Did I hear the REFORM party talking about this? Silly me, of course I didn't.

[@Occident.]

They are the latest gate keepers.

[@clemobenoit5813]

@@Occident. Eskimos vote for them you know..

[@lizzapaolia959]

How can anyone not enjoy your videos 🤔. Great video of yours as always. They have to scrape the laws as these morally defective lowlife's have no honor. Thank you for sharing this information. God bless you and your beautiful historical country 🙏

[@drewmillz1]

For all the videos that Simon has made. Whether I agreed with him or not, he seemed to be able to role with the content of the story and have a happy spirit about it. This one is so troubling that even Simon can’t hide the shock, disbelief, and horror of what he’s reporting on. The realization of how bleak the future is for the natives of the UK. The occupiers in govt posing as representatives of the people. Are clearly taking marching orders and those marching orders are shredding the fabric of those societies. If you didn’t think there was a plan to wipe out the European before this? There’s no mistaking it now with this report.

[@xt7190]

It's strange, when Simon is Soo concerned with immigration, one would think an intelligent man, as he professes to be would be curious as to Who FUNDS the NGO's supporting the travel at every coast they land on. Providing phones and sims, food, tickets for travel and money, that takes some major funding, yet the question never gets asked????????????????

[@79joddy]

There has always been a terrible obsession with the Stephen Lawrence murder that I can never fathom. Getting rid of double jeopardy and trial by jury are terrible ideas. It will be used to promulgulate the prevailing ideology and will be used where it suits. In part it will help implementation of various hate speech laws because it will be a certainty that it will be used in trials involving race/ethnicity/transphobia etc.

[@kevinhockridge9221]

It would have been better to have Peter Sutcliffe walk free than to have scrapped the double jeopardy law. It was the ultimate safeguard against an oppressive state.

[@keithwilkins1437]

The legal system was elitist ,now it"s elitist ,biased ,and snouts in trough . When you notice the new generation of solicitors and where they come from you can see why .

[@paulhwbooth]

Spot on, Mr Webb.

[@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb]

Thank you!

[@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO]

If you were more intelligent than a fart you would know that your husband Simon Webb is seldom spot on.

[@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO]

Your opinion on the Double-Jeopardy rule doesn't surprise me in the slightest as you are a knuckle-dragger. You are so mentally deficient to the point where you need to be told that everything evolves, except subhumans like you and your fans. There was a time in history when rapi--g was not a crime; and there was a time when domestic violence wasn't illegal unless it resulted in murder; but intelligent people evolve. Likewise it was realised that the Double-Jeopardy rule was out of date, therefore action was taken to improve on it, rightly so, it now means that if advances in forensic science improve and hard evidence is found then a suspect will face justice. In this modern age the only real injustice is that the likes of you and your fans are protected under British Law and the Human Rights Law, if it was up to me, the likes of you and your fans wouldn't be protected under any law, because you and your fans are less than humans, which is why if someone was to snuff you lot out, the culprit cannot be convicted of murder, because by definition 'Murder' means deliberate and malicious taking of human life, and since you and your fans are subhumans you cannot be murdered. ​@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb

[@jeffatkins6890]

Once again quality out put

[@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO]

@@jeffatkins6890 Quality output? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@phileasterbrook6894]

This brought about by the government need to have ‘valuable immigrants’ available for the future workforce of this country!