How Denmark, Germany, and the UK, are Taking Down China's Energy Empire

This is an area of the north sea just off the coast of Denmark called Doggerland. It currently is a hotspot for fishermen, however, just recently, its purpose has become much more important. In fact, this patch of seemingly endless water may soon become one of the most important areas in the entire world.
You see, this spot, right here, could single handedly shift the balance of power for the entire world, while also making some countries rise to the level of superpower, and make others end their reign of world dominance
Around 6,000 years ago, what would you do if you wanted to travel long distances and establish trade routes of hundred of kilometers. Well, around 4,000 BC, virtually everyone had to walk. And thats not exactly the easiest thing to do. Some merchants started domesticating horses and camels which meant they could carry more goods and travel more efficiently. But still, long distance trade was extremely difficult and risky for human beings at that time.
But then one day, somewhere probably in Egypt, someone, who was likely walking along the coastline of the mediterranean, or the red sea, had an idea. What if an invisible force that seems to be able to make trees move and make the seas turn rough, what is that force could be harnessed. Of course, this person, who we will never know, was talking about a technology that would change humanity forever. It was the first time we harnessed the power of wind.
Primitive sailing boats started springing up in egypt who used them to trade all along the red sea and mediterranean. And over the course of the next several thousand years, the ability to harness the power of the wind, would dictate the empires of the world.
The persian empire relied heavily on its transport ships in order to invade and conquer the eastern mediterranean.
The roman empire relied heavily upon its ability to trade in bulk with the rest of the world, in order to get the resources it needed to build its empire.
Later, the british, portuguese, spanish, and the Dutch would become the world superpowers almost solely through their advancements in harnessing wind power in the most advanced ships of their time, like the carrack. And the Galleon.
But then, in 1887, a scottish professor named james blyth had a different idea of how to harness the wind. You see, by this time, the wind wasn’t just harnessed for the use of sailing, but it was also being used for things like pumping water, or grinding up grain.
But JAmes Blyth had a different idea. He saw that the world was adapting to a newly discovered technology called electricity. So he thought, mayve he could use his cottages windmill to produce some electricity. And well thats what he did. He then offered to gift this electricity he generated, to the town his cottage was in, which was marykirk. However, they politley declined, saying that this was clearly the work of the devil.
But that didn’t stop the rest of the world from becoming electrified. Right now, most of the electricity in the world is generated by Coal, Gas, and Oil. There was a brief moment in time when Nuclear energy may have been on a trajectory to become the words best and most efficient energy source. However, you can essentially point to the day where those dreams were crushed, april 26, 1986. The day Chernobyl happened, the world essentially shut off its investment into nuclear energy, and went back to fossil fuels.
And this reliance on these resources have created superpowers and monopolies over the last century.
Think of standard oil in the united states which was arguably the most powerful company in modern history. You can even look at modern day energy superpowers like saudia arabia that single handedly cheapened the entire worlds energy supply in 2020 by purposefully flooding the oil market in 2020.
There are plenty of other examples of countries gaining wealth fairly quickly from discoveries of oil as well, like norway, and more recently, guyana.
The point being, oil, gas, and coal have been one of the largest generators of wealth and power for countries over the last 100 years, because of how they can cheaply generate electricity and power for our modern day economies.
Want some Advice? Ask Me on Reddit!
/ jackchapple
Personal:
On Tik Tok: @jackchapple
On Reddit: / jackchapple
On Instagram! / jack_chapple_real
On Twitter! / jackchapplesci
On Facebook! / chapplerei
CONTACT:
[e-mail]
OR (even better, and more likely to get to me): Send me a tweet or instagram DM.

[@JackChappleShow]

Hello there :)

[@utkarsh698]

Hello ❤

[@danielhama4558]

Heeeeyyyy!!!!! Glad to hear your voice

[@leom1044]

Wuddddddddaaaaaaaaaapppp!!!😂

[@amerikanongbikolano3163]

Nice to hear you back Jack

[@kittenlang8641]

That was truly insanely stupid to anyone who watches the market & TECHNOLOGY. Start with the basics: Michael shellenberger. Follow the money from there and this vid ends up looking like a Ponzi scheme.

[@HeisenbergFam]

Its a miracle, Jack remembered password after 5 months

[@youtubeuser206]

GE was one of the most brutal heartless and exploitative corporations ever

[@cirentXD]

Evidence?

[@peachypietro9980]

Was gonna say that, too

[@peachypietro9980]

No one should look at GE as if it's a model for anything other than corporate exploitation and suspicious behavior

[@290revolver290]

​@@cirentXDThe evidence crew always jumping on the word "evidence" every time someone says anything, as if they would do anything about the situation if the evidence was placed in front of them. Hypocrites.

[@290revolver290]

💯

[@TUMIDPLAGUE078]

Doesn't china supply many of the resources required to produced wind power turbines? Wouldn't this just give them more power over the world?

[@kittenlang8641]

Yeah and they make all the solar panels (or have a must-have component). Another vlogger just posted that Huawei has busted or achieved more than Android code. My opinion: this is the lamest pro-wef/soros/gates/deep state/eu/western collective elitist propaganda I've seen over the past two whole years. Lamest of the lame, deserves to be shamed.

[@Ushio01]

They do but it's not something they have exclusively and competition exists already so they don't have the dominance like they do with raw materials for batteries.

[@namiaris2525]

​@@Ushio01ưhat about rare earth? I known every body has rare earth but China provides the cheapest und the largest of rare earth processing. Does any country has a counter programm ?

[@sithdemon5965]

Bots... lol.. Get better china. You're losing the race. Learn empathy and the force.

[@kaksidaksi3455]

also chinas dominance on manufacturing is slipping hard

[@Aaron.Monroe]

Wow, wish you posted regularly again. We are all loyal subscribers. Everything you’re going through, we’re here for you.

[@ericvulgate]

People have been sailing FAR longer than six thousand years. Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia were colonized tens of thousands of years ago, and they didn't swim.

[@hamzamo.7180]

I think that happened back in the Ice Age. They walked there

[@alanedwards1179]

Good to see you back. You don't post so often but I like your stuff 🤩

[@tombayless9759]

What about the birds

[@ausniannative3055]

What about farms, what about people, what about beauty? Besides how terrible an option they are for energy, these things would only be considered by soy bugmen who live in cities

[@maikelvane5185]

Good luck with that wishful thinking. 😂

[@robrapiti9089]

Good to see you back, Jack.

[@GTH4121]

This informative video shared positivity and optimism. Thank you.

[@peachypietro9980]

Another couple of points I have to interject: wind power won't be able to cover total current demand, let alone future demand. Even at its peak, it doesn't put out enough wattage, as we're talking about demand in the terawatt range (in contrast to megawatt or gigawatt range for solar and wind). In contrast, the most viable, financially feasible, and public friendly energy source that's coming into commercial production in the next 2 years is laser drilled, deep geothermal. It's the only energy source aside from nuclear fission that can provide enough energy to reach the terawatt range. True, it'll take some time to scale, but by 2050, we could have a net zero carbon energy economy - which is as good if not better than wind in terms of scalability, and definitely better than wind and solar as far as ecological disruption and raw resource requirements.

[@iancordell4718]

IN MY JOURNEY AS A JOURNALIST FROM ENGLAND, FATE LED ME TO CROSS PATHS WITH MRS LETTON DEB, AN EXCEPTIONAL EXPERT WHOSE LEGITIMACY AND MAGICAL METHODS HAVE LEFT ME DEEPLY TOUCHED. HER NEW STRATEGY HAS BROUGHT ME CONSISTENT EARNING EVERY SINGLE WEEK, ILLUMINATING MY PATH WITH HOPE AND PROSPERITY

[@fenzodantani]

Impressed by a client's testimony, i tried her out and I'm expecting my third cashout in 2 days

[@scottshah2483]

After her broadcast on ABC NEWS about profitable investment and trading my family got in touch with her. She's now our personal Broker, also serving many families in the United States as a licensed broker and FINRA AGENT

[@sophiawatson9001]

I have never come across any complain from her clients about losses; I believe she is among the best. Mrs Letton Deb managed to grow my portfolio from 0.82 btc to 2.17 btc in just two weeks of trading. What an exceptional talent!

[@Naturenerd1000]

Dogger Land is a sunken island so it gives a good foundation for a water wind farm. Pretty awesome innovative idea.

[@carbonurbuddy3456]

Good to go back with another fascinating topic..😮😊

[@toddbrown417]

The verdict is not out on wind EROEI...energy return on energy invested....wind can be an energy in small application, but not societies and infrastructure

[@BarrettCharlebois]

what's that music in the opening? the classical sounding track with what sounds like chello

[@madsam0320]

I think it’s a sign of desperation to depend on an energy source that is hardly dependable. The war in Ukraine has a lot to answer for.

[@Deontjie]

No. A massive power plant that switches on or off at random is a good thing. Just shut your huge manufacturing plant down when there is no wind. Send the workers home to go and enjoy the windless beaches. Everybody wins.

[@madsam0320]

@@Deontjie that’s the spirit, I heard birth rates normally spiked about nine months after a major blackouts.

[@chrissmith2114]

We already tried wind power and gave it up to use steam and then diesel.... Using wind power it took 6 months to get goods from Australia to UK. Wind power is nowhere near reliable enough to run modern society that totally relies on electricity, then of course those electric vehicles need charging. Wind farm investment in UK is dropping rapidly because there is no profit in it and nobody wants to invest in a failing technology.... The wind may be cheap but everything else is expensive, and offshore wind farms have limited life and high maintenance costs...

[@yogikarl]

You may want to get information about thorium-molten-salt-reactors - cheaper than wind and twenty four seven

[@stefang3709]

There are several problems still ith wind energy. It interferes with the natural surroundings and birds, they dont work when its windstill and lightnings kan strike them.

[@alibali672]

And they each require a huge amount of oil to run, also oil or other energy to restart when there has been no wind. They also have a short lifespan. Very little can be recycled.

[@fastertove]

Negative impact on the surroundings isn't proven

[@tessjuel]

This is out on the sea, there's always some wind there. In any case, Norway produces 156 TWh of hydroelectric power a year, Sweden 70.6 TWh and Scotland isn't far behind. Hydroelectric power can be switched on and off very fast so it can be used to even out the energy supply over time. Hydroelectric power plants can even be used as "batteries" by pumping water up into the reservoirs when electricity is abundant and releasing it when there's a shortage. Solar power is also an important part of a well balanced renewable energy mix. It's even more unstable than wind power of course but the two tend to compliment each other, when one is high, the other is low.

[@tessjuel]

@@alibali672 All moving mechanisms need lubricants to function and wind turbines are no exception. They don't need more of it than fossil fuel or nuclear power plants though. Average lifespan for a wind turbine blade is 20-25 years and they can certainly be recycled, in fact a lot of new blades are already made from recycled old ones. The life expectancy for a gas powered plant is 25 to 35 years and for a cola or oil fueled one 30 to 50 years. You can't really compare those numbers directly though since it's only the blades of the wind turbine that wear out faster. The rest of the installation lasts just as long as other power plants.

[@tessjuel]

@@fastertove There is always negative impacts on the surroundings. But we need energy to survive, even a stone age society does, and wind, solar and renewable biomass (renweable as in not chopping down trees without replanting that is) are all far less damaging to the environment than fossil fuel.

[@wasteddragon8201]

2 minutes in and all I'm imagining is a tractor pull competition where one of the tractors has sails. China wins!

[@keltonfoster]

They sure make an impressive jet engine they use on the Boeing 777.

[@user-zq4pb1lm5k]

still need to be able to store the energy so batteri technology needs to mature fast.

[@azncs11]

2 posts a year😅

[@the_nondrive_side]

pretty sure the failure point of wind power was lifespan and copper supply. both being insufficient for this to scale to that degree. pretty sure we were sailing about as fast as we were swimming

[@makgeoff]

Your channel's research and quality has been on steep decline. Wind Energy cannot be shared across too far distance and there is no sole patent ownership to wind turbine generators. Besides, there are other renewables different countries can harness their own. Thus this will not affect China while China's your so called dominance on energy sector is not measurable and comparable like this without talking about the Net Zero goals by country in details.

[@danishcommander4dk]

The shape of Denmark in your thumbnail is wrong. The southern part of Denmark called Sønderjylland is missing.

[@ajohny8954]

Damn, in need of some KZbin coins again?

[@halohat2286]

Small, reliable, clean and safe modular nuclear is the answer and is needed now. We dont need gisnt expensive nuclear and we shouldnt let the failure of old nuclear like Chernobyl end our current best option for energy worldwide.

[@Hession0Drasha]

We can also get a lot of fish farming around the turbines 😊

[@BertWald-wp9pz]

Wind power is great but the costs need to factor in the backup downtime. Present Battery storage capacity is minuscule and it is not cost free and pumped hydro or simply backup hydro rely on having the right locations which are few and generally environmentally disruptive. Power sharing networks have transmission losses, need the right balance and are raw material hungry. More raw materials means more mining which at present is mainly fossil fuel powered. Not wishing to pour rain in the parade, creating net zero will involve huge projects, a lot of money have long construction and lead in times so the ‘we will be be the greatest …..’ talk is great for those who like to talk. For those who want delivery and economic viability the devil os in the detail - detail that always seems lacking in the mainstream discussion.

[@Gergenuss]

As a dane - I would like to point out that the borders you put are missing sønderjylland. Its the borders before 1920 plebiscites. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1920_Schleswig_plebiscites

[@johannel8104]

Wind does not scale as easily and quickly as solar. Wind project installations are massive undertakings requiring gigantic machines. Solar installations does not. Solar can also be deployed at resudential and commercial level unlike wind (only utility scale). Solar also has no moving parts and requires no to little maintenance (maybe removing dust and snow in some areas), unlike massive wind turbines that requires major service and has massive moving parts. Cost declins and growth are on the side of solar. Globally in 2010 wind installed capacity was at 198 GW and solar was at 40 GW. By the end of last year wind was at 906 GW and solar at 1185 GW. In 12 years wind went from a 5x capacity advantage to a >30% disadvantage. Last year 77 GW of new wind was deployed but 275 GW of solar. Globally installed capacity for solar silicone, wafer, chip and modules are all over 900 GW. We are on track for 360 GW of solar deployments this year. I think the figures speak for themselves. Wind is great (because wind and solar are complementary technologies on a daily and seasonal basis) and hopefully we can scale to 200+ GW of annual deployments. But we will be reaching 800-1000 GW solar by then. It won't even be close. The turbine manufacturers are not the ones that will be making the money and in control. Hardware simply can't compete w software businesses (the arbitrage system providers on the grid).

[@peachypietro9980]

Don't know if I'd agree that China is at the level of "world dominance" (whatever that means in a world where power is multi-tiered and diffuse throughout institutions and social structures at the national, international, transnational, and supranational level). If you're basing that on Chinese corporations - most of which are transnationally structured and only partially headquartered in China - again, I wouldn't necessarily agree with the assertion: basing it on production vis a vis global trade, Chinese manufacturing accounted for 1/4 as of only a few years ago; but basing it on other factors, such as Chinese state run military bases outside of China, hahah, they have all of TWO bases not physically located within their territorial boundaries. So!... yeah, you'll have to qualify that some more.

[@barrysmith1202]

china needs to be guarded against, as per their surprising potential for serious challenges to all comers, in many fields, and their ability to make astonishing corrections to problems, and their stated intentions for global dominance since, literally 1948, Mao.

[@Dawn-zo2ny]

@@barrysmith1202~ Some channels that expose China are: China Uncensored, China Fact Chasers, The China Show - (So far there are 176 episodes, even though only a few show up on the video page, so i type in the number, like 176, into the search on their video page, and that episode will come up, and you can type in any number that precedes that as well), Serpentza, laowhy86, and there are more...🌟

[@alibali672]

Wind turbines have numerous shortcomings. They have a limited lifespan, each requires 900 tons of steel, 2,600 tons of concrete, 45 tons of non-recyclable plastic. They also need up to 700 gallons of oil for the gears and hydraulic systems which must be replaced every year. Scotland used huge diesel generators to de-ice their turbines during cold weather. Scottish Power admitted it had to hook up windmills to the fossil fuel supply to keep the turbines warm and working, taking energy from the grid rather than producing it. A lot of so-called green energy projects are being undertaken because of the huge governmental (i.e. tax-payer) grants available, making them lucrative for the energy companies.

[@JB-wh6rp]

right on - and your only mentioning some of the inconvenient truth

[@NorthWindAfrican]

Danes are not the brightest people, literally fell fo the whole (90%) floo fear monger and everything, the country wont last half a year now in stability, just fax..

[@bentalexranebundgaard4867]

You are using rather pisspoor old turbines then, also your numbers is not up to date, Vestas has developed new recycling so the non recyclebly plastic can be recycled

[@denise8242]

And those wind turbines are made in China!

[@jake3159]

Haha, oil plant will burn that 700 gallons in a minute to the atmosphere 🤣🙈

[@LJ-jj5vn]

Welcome back! So happy to see you have put out a new video! I don't agree with these government agencies or private corporations in regards to wind power being a cost effective, environmentally or human rights/people friendly way of creating electricity in the future. There are many important and valid reasons for humanity to avoid the use of any type of "renewable" energy (as well as the manufacturing and use of batteries for electric cars, solar power containment, etc.) as they all cause many social and environmental issues that unfortunately the public is rarely, if ever, informed of - for example, all wind turbines, electric car batteries, solar panels and batteries are not recyclable so they end up sitting in dumps polluting the earth. Most people will tell you that they are doing a "good thing" by supporting the use of renewable energy but most of those people have never questioned why they believe that because most of them have grown up being told that's what to think and they trust their schools, government and the media to be honest with them, to give them all of the facts and to do what's in their best interest. lmao Despite the various types of atrocities and the needless loss of life people have experienced and continue to experience all over the world, more often than not due to the deceit of the very people they trusted to tell them how to live their lives and keep them "safe". Sorry, I struggle daily to understand why people are so willing to blindly trust a complete stranger with their well-being and the safety and security of their family. Anyway, back to wind energy lol the materials used to build wind turbines are predominantly mined and all mining comes at a heavy cost to the environment (including water, soil, air, plants, domestic animals and wildlife), the people doing the mining and to the countries and communities affected by it. According to www.business-humanrights.org/ "The World Bank estimates a 250% rise in demand for key minerals used in wind turbines under a 2 degree climate scenario, including aluminium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, neodymium, nickel and zinc. As many of these minerals currently have limited recycling possibilities, new mining projects will be needed to meet the demand of wind power developers worldwide." If you truly care about the truth then you need to understand the impact that mining each of these minerals needed for these "renewable" energies will have on our environment year after year. I for one didn't know much at all about mining until I started researching the various minerals needed for electric car batteries and that sent me down a research hole that is still ongoing and constantly shocking me to my core. People need to look at where and how a mineral is mined and ask relevant questions. What impact does it have on the environment where and how it's being mined, as well as where it's being processed? How does it impact the wildlife and all of nature around it? (Despite us not hearing about these things there has been some research done regarding these questions for each mineral) How much water is being used to get to the end result needed? How much of that water is left polluted? What happens with the polluted water created from mining and processing it? What impact does that polluted water have on the environment? How much is left unusable or left behind? How much, and what type, of energy is being used to both mine and process the mineral? What's the impact to the environment from that energy use? Is it a mine where the mineral is affected by declining ore head grades or a declining supply of water to the mine? (Look this up as it's important.) What happens to the mine when it no longer has anything left to give? What's the impact to the environment and the communities around it then? What cost does a non-producing mine have on the consumer? (Who ever owns it is incurring costs to keep it locked up, etc. and you know those costs are being passed along to the consumer in some way.) Then once you're done all of the environmental impact assessments of a particular mineral you then need to look at the impact mining it has on the people doing the work. Believe me when I say that mining and processing companies don't have the best human rights practices. Then after you have a good look at how horrifically the people doing the work are treated, how little they are paid, look at the conditions in which they live day to day. Have a look at the impact mining has on their health (if they survive it) then look at how that mine is affecting the communities around it or near it. (How it affects their water, soil, air, transportation, access to needed supplies, etc.) Once you get through assessing all of the mines and processing plants for just one mineral around the world and multiply your results by years into the future I'm not sure how you could feel renewable energy was worth it. The World Bank estimates that the world will need about 550 million tons of COPPER ALONE over the next 25 years to meet global demand which is nearly the same quantity produced over the past 5000 years! Think about this. Copper ore is most commonly mined through a process called open-pit mining. (This process is also used to extract aluminum, gold, iron, and uranium.) Open-pit mines are vast holes that are dug into the ground by heavy machinery until they reach rock, then more heavy machinery is used to drill holes into the rock, then explosives are used to blast the rocks open and break them up into boulders which are then hauled to a processing site to extract the copper ore. (How much fossil fuel do you think is used on average to do this?) Open-pit mines are massive so depending on where they're located the impact on the environment can vary. These mines can be nearly a mile in diameter and several thousand feet deep. Their size means significant amounts of damage is done wherever they dig and this damage has an impact on nature. Deforestation can take place which is home to thousands of wildlife species which are then displaced. It also eliminates topsoil and can cause more rapid soil erosion in the area. Any water surrounding a copper mine can quickly become polluted with copper acid and this contaminated water can severely impact groundwater aquifers, fish, wildlife, and farmland. Part of the reason for the water being so polluted is due to the water being used to remove waste. 99 tonnes of waste material must be removed for every 1 ton of extracted copper. Can you even imagine how much water this is? Copper mining also releases toxic chemicals and they pollute the air and this can harm people’s skin, eyes, and lungs and make breathing difficult and it's also doing all of this to any wildlife around too. The rocks being removed and exposed to the atmosphere for the first time, can transmit radioactive substances and damaging chemicals which can affect the soil surrounding the mine. While some copper is essential for human health, an excess can be fatal. This blurb is just a small look at copper mining and doesn't even get into the real impact copper mining has on the environment but does it sound environmentally friendly to you? Thanks for taking the time to read my rant. 🙂 I hope even one person considers what I'm saying here and rethinks their commitment to renewable energy.

[@Larsbor]

What has Denmark and GE in common ? .. And what does it have to do with barbwire …?

[@briangriffiths1285]

Gosh this is a bit overlong... The Dogger Bank is being exploited by the UK being in UKl waters. The initial wind farm is 4 tranches making up to 5 GW of power. A fifth Dogger Bank D at 2 GW is being investigated and Dogger Bank South is being exploited in 2 wind farms of 3 GW in total. The first turbines in Dogger Bank A have just been erected. 2.4 GW are planned to be in operation by March of 2024. Whilst Dogger Bank is important Scotland recently awarded leases for over 25 GW of off shore wind in areas where up to 60% of nameplate output may be achieved. HVDC interconnectors to mainland Europe will help spread the love of surplus power whilst at the same time borrowing power in periods of low wind. The time differences help shift peak demand too. Just as in the UK we are paid to use power at times of surplus wind.

[@stevewallace425]

every tine he says however, take a drink

[@kkkkoouciLolol]

Im guessing without seeing the video, turns out invest a decade of construccion on a nuclear plant is a good thing lol

[@iandaniel1748]

I believe first boat build society effort with communion endeavor

[@theirrydamiens5840]

Very good

[@davidcunningham2074]

very interesting

[@Siskiyous6]

Wind power doesn't work on land, add the cost of doing it at sea and what we have is folly.

[@spiralofhope]

Sodium ion batteries are coming.

[@utkarsh698]

One of the best channel on KZbin 🔥

[@autonestegg4195]

5 year payback, vast resources used, they last maybe 20-25 years, are 33% efficient intermittant not constant power and you can't recycle the blades...on top of killing hawks bats eagles and owls no thank you...small modular reactors for reliable 24/7 energy for me tyvm!

[@lawrencefox563]

Still advocate of ocean tidal power generation, I imagined submarine tethered to ocean bottom with huge low rpm prop and power cord going inland but my nephew pointed out far better system that resembles baline whales feeding filters.

[@Ushio01]

Ocean tidal power has lots of problems you have salt water corrosion which requires lots of maintenance which is potentially hard with tidal turbines and worse sea life like barnacles clogging up turbines fast it's why so many experimental tidal turbine attempts fail the maintenance costs exceed the benefits.

[@lawrencefox563]

@@Ushio01 thanks good info sea and salt water is harsh environment but pails compared to hazards of nuclear, Im sure that man on the moon Elan can seek/find solutions and yes turbines exposed to open ocean/ sea life are no/go.

[@JellyAntz]

⁠​⁠@@lawrencefox563the hazards of nuclear are nothing compared to that of fossil fuels that are actually more radioactive and obviously polluting. Nuclear waste is not green goo, it is solid and incased in fortresses of concrete. All the world’s nuclear waste can fit in a few football fields. Nuclear energy is magnitudes more efficient too. Tidal energy would be cool too, but it’s apparently a logistical nightmare and will be much more damaging to the environment in its misuse than malicious fearmongering about nuclear. We can also turn sewage into energy and that would be revolutionary especially for poor countries too

[@sigmalife9625]

No wonder NATO and E.U. struggling right now

[@keatingaaron]

This is a long stretch of the bow all this. Much depends on many variables and "what-if's". This is almost click bait material.

[@bobstewart4342]

now bidum wants wind powered cars, except his car.

[@RaspberryWhy]

Though I've given you a thumbs up, please don't make it an advertisement for a particular company. GE are an important company in this field but frankly the others have been doing alot more for this technology over the last 30 years. They (General Electric) have just jumped onto a speeding train. Don't sound like fanboy, it's embarrassing. I expected more, you should be better than that

[@jasmikko]

More clickbait than useful info

[@ryanwilliams989]

Since Biden took office, there seem to have been more unfavorable results in America. These results include effects on the markets, such as price declines and sharp increases in inflation, as well as bank failures. I wonder if the sudden increase in interest rates will help value investors or if it would be wiser to stay away from the stock and financial markets for the time being.

[@maryHenokNft]

To "buy the dip" It will be profitable in the long run. However, investors should be wary of the bull run. It is advisable to connect with a skilled adviser to fulfill your growth objectives and prevent mistakes. High interest rates typically result in lower stock prices.

[@TheresaAnderson-kf5xw]

I truly enjoy having a portfolio coach to help me make market judgments on a daily basis. They possess a special combination of abilities that enable them to take both long and short positions, benefiting from the possibility of significant gains while also safeguarding against downward turns. I have had a portfolio coach for more than two years and throughout that time I've actually earned over $645k. It was a wonderful

[@maggysterling33254]

@@TheresaAnderson-kf5xw Could you guide me on how to get in touch with your advisor? My funds are being eroded by inflation, and I'm seeking a more lucrative investment strategy to effectively utilize them.

[@maggysterling33254]

@@TheresaAnderson-kf5xw Can you please provide me with information on how to contact your advisor? I'm currently experiencing a decline in my funds due to inflation, and I'm in search of a more profitable investment strategy to make the most of my resources.

[@TheresaAnderson-kf5xw]

My trusted advisor goes by the name of *Mary Onita Wier* a well-established and highly respected professional in her field. I would strongly encourage you to conduct in-depth research into her qualifications and achievements. With numerous years of experience under her belt, she proves to be an invaluable asset for individuals seeking guidance in the intricate landscape of the financial markets.

[@doghouse010]

to sum up: Wind power will be significant in the future.

[@Al-yu6bq]

You need oil to get the materials from the mine to build wind turbins, When gas, oil and coal is run out, our civilization will gone

[@tdreamgmail]

Meanwhile in China, Thorium reactor online.

[@sjelucten7150]

Lee Kwan Yew ** Only 3 nations matter: Russia, China, The USA and the rest are mere small potatoes**. LeeKwanYew was a man of vision, what he said in 2009 has become reality.

[@erlanddaremo811]

As you mentioned, sometimes there is no wind especially during winter when it's most needed. What you didn't mentioned is that windmills are the great reaper, not only to birds but also to insects, a major part of these animals source of food. No more birds, hooray. Hence, no tumbs up for you.

[@matiasc4121]

What about people living near by big turbines geting sick because of the silent noice? Could that happen to the animals and fish near by?

[@zionistkillingmachine]

whales are dying because of this shit

[@dennisjensen2458]

Not happening. Anyway noone lives 200 kilometers into the ocean.

[@josedelapinio]

Good thing this isn't a history video 😂😂😂

[@Nohelp894]

Yeah it's definitely better for the environment and more cost effective to build giant wind turbines, that need massive amounts of petroleum to function, all over the ocean. We need to admit that wind and solar power are not the answers so that those billions in tax dollars can go toward better ideas. The only way we will actually reduce emissions is for people to stop flying/driving unless absolutely necessary, and to stop buying so many useless and unnecessary goods. These mega-ships, like the ones that come from shipping giants in Denmark and Holland pollute the world at insane rates and allow hyperconsumerism to continue.

[@johngooch8509]

I have wondered if there is a way to decide which of these 7 dates is the time Jesus died for us: 27 AD 4th month 10th day, 30 AD 4th month 7th day, 31AD 3rd month 28th day, 31 AD 4th month 27th day, 32 AD 4th month, 16th day, 33 AD 4th month 3rd day, 34 AD 4th month 23rd day and assuming that the Julian Calendar is being used, instead of the Gregorian Calendar that we use today. As the Solar Eclipse is such an outstanding coincidence in Astronomy, of which the Astronomers still can not agree an explanation, I have focused on it. The nearest Solar Eclipse to these dates is the 32 AD 4th month 16th day, when it happened on the 28th day. But this date is on a Wednesday, and I have read that Friday is the greater probability, for various reasons. The next nearest date, is the 31 AD 4th month 27th day which occurred nearly 13 days before the Solar Eclipse on the 10th day of the 5th month, and the 13 is the reverse of 31! For this date the 1st day of the Jewish month called Nissan, was starting on the evening of Friday the 13th day of the 4th month, which also has a 13! It started in the evening 77 hours after the New Moon which was at 31 AD 4th month 10th day at 13:32 Jerusalem time with yet another 13! 77=11*7 and 31 AD 4th month 27th day, is also the 117th day of 31 AD! The Saros Series number of the Solar Eclipse is number 77! The Solar Eclipse before in the same Saros series 77, is the first Solar Eclipse in the AD era, and it was in 13 AD! Psalm 117 is the smallest chapter in the Bible! Psalm 117 is the exact middle chapter the 595th chapter of the King James Bibles 1189 chapters! The 117th chapter, is the last chapter of Leviticus, and Leviticus is the middle book of the 5 books, called the Pentateuch and also called the Torah. The King James Bible is the most published Scripture version of Christianity, Judaism, and even Islam! Psalm 117 is the 595th chapter and 595=119*5 and the Sunday resurrection, was on the 119th day of 31 AD. Psalm 119 is the biggest chapter of the Bible! 595=5*7*17=1*35*17*1*1 and from that the series of numbers 13 51 711 can be made, and if reversed is 117 15 31 and the 9th hour was also 15:00 hours of that day!!! What is more the length of one orbit of the Moon around the Earth, relative to the Stars, is 27 days 7 hours 43 minutes 11.5 seconds (slowly getting longer, but this is what it was in 2000 AD) which is like the 27th day 4th month 31 AD at 15:00 hours! In one month is 31 days 7 months out of the 12 months, and there is 4 weeks in a month making 2 fortnights, again like 31 AD 4th month 27th day! NASA used an E.L.P. Equation (Éphéméride Lunaire Parisienne) to calculate the Solar Eclipses and Wiki says: A more precise figure may be derived for a specific synodic month using the lunar theory (Lunar theory - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_theory)) of Chapront-Touzé and Chapront (1988) (Ephemeride Lunaire Parisienne - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeride_Lunaire_Parisienne)): 29.5305888531 + 0.00000021621*T* − 3.64×10^−10*T^2 where T = (JD − 2451545.0)/36525 and JD is the Julian day number (Julian day - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day_number)) (and JD=2451545 corresponds to 1 January, AD 2000). Éphéméride Lunaire Parisienne is a lunar theory (Lunar theory - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_theory)) developed by Jean Chapront, Michelle Chapront-Touzé. 364=2*2*7*13=7*1*1*7*4*13 like 31 AD 4th month 117th day reversed! 21621=3*7207= The 29.5305888531 days minus 28 days of 4 weeks is 1.5305888531 and the series of numbers is almost symmetrical 153058 8 8531 around the middle of the 3 8s and the word Jesus in Greek has a Gematria value of 888!! In John 21:11 it says about 153 Fishes, and 153=3*3*17=3*3*1*1*17 like 3 O Clock the 9th hour on 31 AD 117th day! 2111 is the 318th Prime and 318+153=471 reminding me that 4 is the only number with a cross shape in it and that 4 is the middle number of 7! 318-153=165 and at the 165th place of Pi, is the number 2701, the most famous 4 digit number in Bible Numerics! 2701=37*73 and 3773=2701+1072 and 1072 is the reverse of 2701! 1072+117=1189 like the 1189 chapters of the King James Bible! 3773=7*7*7*11=11*7^3*1 like the 117th day of 31 AD! The Tangent of 53.1 degrees = 1.33333333=4/3=1+(1/3) reminding me of 31 AD and this is from the angle of a stair case in a House and the Builders set square based on the 3 4 5 Triangle! 3/58=0.05172413… is 31 AD 4th month 27th day 15:00 hours reversed! 1/85=0.011764… and 31 AD 4th month 27th day is also 31 AD 117th day and 31 AD 17th week 6th day ! (I think the Gregorian date for the 27th is the 25th) There is a repeat cycle of Solar Eclipses of 29 years less 10 days and this period in days is 29.5305888531 days times 358! The initials E.L.P. in numbers like ABC 123 is 51216=2*2*2*2*3*11*97=97*2^4*11*3, which is like 31 AD 4th month 27th day 9th hour reversed! I think God wanted us to build our Belief, "The work of God is to believe in him whom he sent" John 6:29. 629=17*37=1*37*1*17*1 like the 17th week 117th day 31 AD reversed!

[@gunsumwong3948]

I couldn't refrain from commenting this video because its title shows how ignorant the content maker is on the knowledge of international wind power. I am just an ordinary person on the street but before I retired I used to work in the power industry and hence I am still on the look out of facts and figures. There has been a lot of publicity about Dogger Bank wind farm owned by Denmark, Germany and UK, with an ultimate capacity of 4.8GW being the biggest single-location windfarm in the world when finished in 2026. However only a little above 1/4 has been built and operational. Can it take down China's energy empire? The information in the public domain shows in the last three years between 2019 to 2022 the annual addition of wind power in China were 45.67GW(19/20), 46.98GW(20/21) and 36.99GW(21/22). China has been on record able to install almost 10 Dogger Bank wind farms every year in each of the last three years! China's ability of adding an average of 43.21GW/year is not something to laugh at because apart from US and Germany no other country in 2022 has a national total wind power capacity bigger than what China could install in one year! Wind farm is now a sad story for UK as no one put in a bid in the last round of UK auction because the price of electricity has gone up so much that no operator can make money out of the new wind farm based on pre-Ukraine war strike price of below £38/MWh when the market price has shot through £70/MWh, as published by FT. Another killer of the windfarm is the US interest rate hike has added another 40% cost which also killed off nearly every new wind farm project in the US. European operators are pulling out from the American contracts already signed and pay the fines instead of building the wind farms at a loss. In China there has been no interest rate rise but instead small interest rate cuts throughout the same period! In the 2023 published electricity tariff by country Denmark, Germany and UK are the very top three countries charging the highest tariff in the world. If one compare the published average electricity tariff with China then Denmark, Germany and UK are 6.62, 6.5 and 5.87 times higher than China. Therefore if building Dogger Bank wind farm to take down China energy empire the road ahead is very long with many twists.

[@nbrown5907]

Sorry but nuclear is not dead and has shifted gears to fusion. With a by-product of clean water we must have it lol.

[@samanmorawak3491]

ahhhh....see whats happening in germany...and all europe..u r dreaming

[@Futurus_YT]

Yay a video

[@Nat_Ryder]

What a load of hogwash, wasted my time even though I watched at double speed.

[@marktwainboatrestoration-j1600]

You're statement about how many households the wind energy will supply is missing a key phrase. That is "most of the time ". Wind and solar are intermittent by nature. The US grid is available 99.99% of the time and yet people cry if a storm comes through and they miss a night of Netflix. Renewable energy = intermittent power. You mentioned that wind is so cheap, but that doesn't count the massive cost for backup when the wind is still. You have to address the vast differences in grid availability. It is disingenuous to not discuss these issues

[@tempeman101]

Offshore wind farms require a lot of maintenance plus transmission line losses mean high costs / MW. Im sure Gas, coal, oil costs must be cheaper. Wind farms make money when they are paid to dump their electricity. This wont last...

[@harrydecker8731]

There are other downsides to these gigantic ocean windmills. First, they are going to be exposed to salt water, which is corrosive. Land wind turbines have a lifespan of 20 years before they have to be replaced. Ocean wind turbines will most likely have a shorter lifespan. Second, aside from times where there is little or no wind, there will be times where there will be violent storms with high winds. Third, how will all these wind turbines affect the fishing industry as well as sea life? Do whales migrate in these waters? Fourth, to mine and transport and refine the minerals needed to manufacture wind turbines as well as hundreds of miles of power lines, means that huge amounts of machinery are involved that are powered by fossil fuels. The ships needed to transport the newly built parts to assemble the turbines in the ocean are powered by fossil fuels. What kind of impact is this going to have on the environment and atmosphere? Here we have a case of look before you leap. It's not as simple as people are led to believe.

[@NorthWindAfrican]

To itself*

[@starklife2426]

Visual pollution

[@parpie2422]

lol .... After listening to this video, I realized this guy has no clue about geo-economics, economics, or green transition and sustainable technologies.

[@tarmotyyri6733]

A lot of wishful thinking for those who live in an alternate universe. The future belongs to countries that can either harness fusion energy and/or thorium nuclear reactors.

[@stevenjoy3537]

And cheap hydrogen

[@johannel8104]

LOL. No. It doesn't. Nuclear is too complicated and cannot scale. Fusion or fission. You can't have economies of scale and resulting in lower cost without being able to mass produce. If it can't be made in a factory you have no chance.

[@winstonchow3694]

oh please so very informative apart from that stupid everything China bad headline.... haters only hate and spread hate.....

[@BeelP.]

Why is everything you publish involved in some form of China bashing? Absolutely boring!

[@rw2452]

Lol

[@bernadofelix]

The current market/economy is unnecessarily tougher for boomers/senior citizens, I’m used to just buying and holding assets which doesn’t seem applicable to the current rollercoaster market plus inflation is catching up with my portfolio. I’m really worried about survival after retirement.

[@jake3159]

Over 90% gold's value is speculation and jewerly. Nobody will want that shit when times are tough

[@davidschweitzer272]

Change the title. The title should include the word "wind". The current title gives no idea what this is about.

[@Thepaulislame]

A lot of energy experts in the comments, who'da thunk it?

[@ericwebster6911]

Winds may come and go but you can always rely on terrible comments on a video about a subject that requires nuance.

[@Sinn0100]

"The Minister of Climate Change..." are you serious? Just wow. I know precisely what the problem is. It's an issue we here in the states are fighting against right now. I feel for you in Canada but you guys have to take control and get rid of Trudeau immediately. For the love of God do not elect anyone even remotely like him again or this issue will persist.

[@noahway13]

This is an ai production. These shots are nothing but B roll, from first shot on. And that enunciation is too much... Down voted.