This video is really impressive. The level of quality in this video blows away university lectures and you made this so easy to understand. I can imagine sitting in class and not understanding anything the professor said but this is completely the opposite. Great work and keep it up!
@MarshallBrunerRF11 сағат бұрын
That means so much! So glad you found it useful!
@benedekt.5909Күн бұрын
I took me almost 3 years to rediscover fast and slow time principle and the reason for the vertical fft, instead of blindly reprogramming the relevant literature magic in my implementation. This video is perfect for understanding this complex concept, thanks!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
@@benedekt.5909 thanks so much! I’m really happy that you found the video to be useful. Hopefully the notebook helps with that too.
@SyndesiКүн бұрын
Your way of explaining these complicated topics in an easy to follow manner is really impressive, especially when combined with all the custom animated visualizations, real life examples and demo code to play with. I'm really blown away by your work, and I am looking forward to more episodes :D
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
@@Syndesi wow!! Thank you so much! I’m really happy that you’ve gotten some value from it 😊
@SamAltonКүн бұрын
I can't believe the quality of these videos - your presentation is top notch. You're the 3blue1brown of RF systems. My role at my work is more related to analog signals, but I've always had a fascination and appreciation for RF. These videos definitely scratch that itch for me. Looking forward to more!
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
Thanks so much! I have a huge appreciation for analog design as well. So many cool fields in EE :)
@mcintoda97 сағат бұрын
This video was more challenging to follow, but I appreciate the practical chip level example
@MarshallBrunerRF2 минут бұрын
Anything you think would have made it more approachable? It's definitely a hard concept, so I'd love to know if you have any suggestions for explaining it better
@LeonardoPJКүн бұрын
Excellent video. You mentioned the radar from Texas Instruments; I am using the IClegend ones (S3KM111L and S5KM312CL). They also perform these conversion processes. In the paper "On Fundamental Operating Principles and Range-Doppler" by Milovanović, the 2D-FFT is well described.
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Thanks for the reading recommendation! Just looked it up. Yeah there's many options but I had previously looked into the TI one I showcased, so I chose to go with that. Thanks for watching :)
@LeonardoPJКүн бұрын
@@MarshallBrunerRF Did you work only with this hardware?
@MarshallBrunerRF11 минут бұрын
@@LeonardoPJ no most of my work on FMCW systems has been on analog devices phaser radar
@polares8187Күн бұрын
This is freaking amazing. Also you are beyond amazing for providing the links to the books. Great channel
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
Thanks so much! Hopefully you find some use in the resources
@nr.bln.17 сағат бұрын
I know this might be repeating most of the other comments here but I really appreciate your work and your way of presenting these complex topics in such an understandable way without dumbing them down to the point of being superficial. You are proving such a huge amount of value in terms of understanding and I wish you the best 🫶
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
Woah thanks so much!! I'm so glad to hear people are getting value out of them. Hopefully the value continues beyond the videos with the resources and python notebooks. Thanks again - it means a lot :)
@electrowizard2000Күн бұрын
Awesome video, you did a great job motivating each improvement and let me feel like I was discovering it for myself.
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
Thank you! That was my goal :)
@notravstarКүн бұрын
Good videos, I'm really enjoying them and learning a lot. Keep it up!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Took a break from working on the next video to respond to comments - will definitely keep them coming :) Thanks for watching!
@xavierdemers-bouchard2747Күн бұрын
God I love your videos. Always the highlight of my day. So clear. AND study material! Good lord.
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
So happy you enjoyed it!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Try out the challenge if you get time!
@_iflyКүн бұрын
thank you so much for this amazing explanation waiting for more about FMCW such as ( Range, Angle, Velocity) extraction and also and noise removal. also if you could explain about vital sign
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Thanks for watching! Yeah angle of arrival estimation is super interesting as well and I would love to cover it! For noise removal, I will definitely cover various clutter suppression techniques, but for now I have a video on CFAR that covers target detection if you're interested.
@yannikmuller2195Күн бұрын
Sometimes you just find a gem on KZbin
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Thanks so much for watching!
@nadavgvili9684Күн бұрын
Great job , subbed
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
So glad you liked it!
@AvrioxКүн бұрын
Amazing stuff!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Thanks!
@mass1s2 сағат бұрын
What if the target velocity is high enough that the phase of the return changes more than 2 pi radians between chirps? The target would show up with the wrong velocity due to aliasing. I presume long range radars with low chirp rates use a different method?
@MarshallBrunerRF3 минут бұрын
Yeah so that's part of your system design and estimating what your environment will include. For this I chose 24 m/s for the max velocity but for many systems you might want to choose higher than that. You can definitely get aliasing, same as you can with range targets being above your sampling frequency.
@amitlanis3104Күн бұрын
Great video!!! (Btw this comment is from before I saw the video)
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
LOL hopefully when you finish the video you stick by it being a great video :)
@kamsibryan297420 сағат бұрын
What will be the formula to Calculate velocity for a stationary object
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
You can apply both of these same concepts with a 0 velocity target - the output would just be a zero. Try plugging in a 0 velocity target into the included python notebook and see what it outputs. Thanks for watching!
@marotobyКүн бұрын
Yeah new vid!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@Marcin648Күн бұрын
Great explained! I wasn't far off with the idea of checking the rate of change of the target's frequency, but 2D FFT is much better! Any cheaper solution for hardware then ADALM-PHASER? As I guess my half-duplex HackRF is not sufficient for radars. :)
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Yeah there's some awesome chips from TI that have eval boards you can pick up for a little over $100 last time I checked. Thanks for watching!
@anantmishra-h3mКүн бұрын
How does ground penetrating radar work
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Definitely a topic for a later video. I will have to do more research on that as I haven't directly worked on it. Thanks for the suggestion!
@NaifAlqahtaniКүн бұрын
Again awesome video but the titles man. They gotta change 😂❤
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
What don't you like? What would you have named this video? Thanks for watching!
@NaifAlqahtaniКүн бұрын
I dont know what these letters are for. Dont use them.
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
@@NaifAlqahtani what are you talking about?
@NaifAlqahtaniКүн бұрын
@@MarshallBrunerRF before watching the video, FMCW makes no sense to me at all and would not make me want to click at all. Look at how 3b1b titles his videos. Its never technical words unless absolutely necessary.
@SamAltonКүн бұрын
@@MarshallBrunerRF I think it's a balance between accuracy and accessibility, and it depends on the intended audience of the video. The layperson searching on youtube "how does radar know how fast a thing is moving" isn't gonna know what FMCW stands for (I certainly didn't before watching your videos), and that might turn them away from clicking on it. But maybe the layperson isn't the intended audience for this video. It's extremely well made and communicated, but it's also 17 minutes and has a lot of advanced concepts. At the same time, your title is totally accurate, it's about FMCW radar. So if the person searching for this video is interested in specifically FMCW radar, they might be more likely to click - though that's definitely a much smaller fraction of people.
@duncanmcallister7932Күн бұрын
You’ve mentioned radars in cars, but what are some other applications of FMCW Radars?
@OscarzProductionsКүн бұрын
They are used in radar altimeters and proximity fuses too.
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Yeah Oscar mentioned some, but also factories will use them in tracking assembly lines, they're good for imaging because of the very fine resolution, etc.
@walidazerkane9430Күн бұрын
For defense purposes like drone detection with phased array antennas
@rohi_21Күн бұрын
Amazing video! Solved the challenge problem and posted the results on LinkedIn. Love the series and would love to contribute if I can to the development of more videos! Keep up the amazing work!
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
Super cool! Yeah that problem had a few ways to solve it - I want to do more involved ones in the future! What do you mean by contribute?
@ianhutchinson975110 сағат бұрын
Amazing video! I’m a software engineer and write applications responsible for tracking radar detections. If you know anything about tracking and are looking for video suggestions I’d be interested in some on that topic for sure 😊
@JKTCGMV13Күн бұрын
Hell yeah
@MarshallBrunerRFКүн бұрын
:)
@pedrotoledo907014 сағат бұрын
Why are radars so cool?
@MarshallBrunerRF14 сағат бұрын
Yeah they're so awesome! So much more to cover too!