Didn’t expect to find an air-cooled Porsche in a fly-by-wire video.
@eigentlichnett80634 жыл бұрын
Legends say that the interview with the Concorde pilot must be released at some point.
@BadAssEngineering4 жыл бұрын
"This is not an airplane, but my car" That Flex
@concretetoy544 жыл бұрын
one day he will say "This is not a car, but my Concord"
@bradlemmond3 жыл бұрын
Just an ordinary car...
@CTMKD3 жыл бұрын
@@guitarfreak342 lmao
@ekaftan4 жыл бұрын
Pilot: 'disconnect autopilot, I want to fly manually' Airbus: 'I cant do that Dave'
@the803863 жыл бұрын
Pilot: 'well, my name is not Dave'. Airbus: 'Ah my mistake Sir, disengaging autopilot in 3-2-1'.
@Damien.D3 жыл бұрын
@@the80386 =)
@techhelpportalextras30073 жыл бұрын
QF72?
@topethermohenes76583 жыл бұрын
Pilot : turn of all fly by wire computers Airbus : *left the chat
@davem34213 жыл бұрын
*sad dave noises
@josevasco77954 жыл бұрын
I'm a student pilot and today, in my class, we actually talked about the fly-by-wire technology in Advanced Instruments subject. Your videos are not only interesting for people seeking some random learning but also very useful for pilots by recalling it! Cheers from Portugal, keep it up, Joe!!
@eloreneloreneloreneloreneloren Жыл бұрын
Hey, what's your progress for today?
@flywithsheky4 жыл бұрын
11 years ago today, the "Miracle of the Hudson" was successfully pulled off ❤️
@Haywood-Jablomie4 жыл бұрын
11 years ago today, I was 11 years younger.
@moviestudios46814 жыл бұрын
I think it was 12 years ago.
@klssn344 жыл бұрын
Actually it was tomorrow
@tychobra14 жыл бұрын
Riding the envelope 👍
@Haywood-Jablomie4 жыл бұрын
@@moviestudios4681 12 years ago , I was 12 years younger
@chrisk19784 жыл бұрын
Great video as always! Would you consider making one about how pilots navigate across oceans, particularly before GPS?
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
Nice idea for a video!
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe please could you do one about navigating overall. As in GPS waypoints, SID’s/STAR’s etc and maybe different types of approaches
@BORDERMAN20004 жыл бұрын
Probably using loron c
@Bartonovich524 жыл бұрын
Before GPS it was LORAN, OMEGA, and Inertial Navigation which was from about the 1960s. Before that, it was dead reckoning using a drift sight and flight computer like an E6B and making sun/star shots with a solar compass or a sextant. Errors were often significant and cumulative.. but usually good enough with the forecast upper winds from all of the weather ships to enable you to home in on a VOR or NDB which had ranges of a couple hundred miles.
@wrightmf3 жыл бұрын
Back in 1980s I was talking with a former B17 air crew member (he never talked about combat missions), he mentioned one particular flight from mainland US to Hawaii in 1940s where the navigator wanted to make the best accurate timely arrival. Navigator constantly did observations and calculations with no breaks [I forgot to ask did he ever go pee?]. With so much work he got within one minute and one mile. I have no idea how it was normally done but I'm sure a good navigator is very essential.
@Isuru144 жыл бұрын
please do a video on airbus flight control laws as well (normal, direct and alternate)
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
Already in the making
@thecommunist80504 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe can you please explain how the radios work and how to operate them? please
@khairlines4 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe yes king!!!
@Isuru144 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe Eagerly looking forwarding for it. Many Thanks!
@topethermohenes76583 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the dreaded "mechanical backup" 😂
@joshpeace20024 жыл бұрын
That feeling when I see it’s been posted 32 seconds ago
@gaudam5144 жыл бұрын
Joe we need to see your cars. That’s a sweet Porsche
@cleanwing60704 жыл бұрын
Btw, Concorde! Was the first jet civil aircraft to use “Fly by wire” not actually it but very very first version of it P.S. Just realized Joe said it in the end of the video
@Bartonovich524 жыл бұрын
All of the ones previous to Airbus were analogue, though. It was also on the Avro Vulcan and A-5 Vigilante.
@danfrankhouser65794 жыл бұрын
My wife and I fly couple times a year. Since watching your videos I sit in my seat thinking about the subjects you've covered. Pretty cool! Thanks for sharing your amazing amount of knowledge and my hats off to all the pilots up there!
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
I’ve reached my goal😉
@serhiimazur244 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Joe! Your videos as usual are clear to understand! Greetings from Ukraine!
@bigittbuss4 жыл бұрын
Now this is the topic I’ve been waiting for! Thanks for the great content Joe!
@hkr6674 жыл бұрын
How would you know? You commented 2 minutes after the video went live.
@bigittbuss4 жыл бұрын
You know what a thumbnail is, right? And this is obviously not the first time I watch his channel.
@Bobo-ym1df4 жыл бұрын
This is something I’ve always want to know
@wildflyer75414 жыл бұрын
Great introduction! As an aerospace engineer I hope there will be further videos explaining why FBW can be safer than mechanical systems and how a FBW system can detect damaged components and can still continue in normal law.
@Mbonzo443 ай бұрын
You are actually one of the first channels I watched on your squawk code lesson when I was interested with aviation!
@Vincent-wl4yb4 жыл бұрын
Does Captain Joe miss Airbus already???
@techhelpportalextras30073 жыл бұрын
Yep
@Hopeless_and_Forlorn4 жыл бұрын
Nice job. Retired mechanic here--not many people realize that the Boeing 737-100 and -200, introduced in 1968 and 1969, had a basic but very functional fly-by-wire capability built into the SP-77 autopilot. With the autopilot engaged in control wheel steering mode (CWS), the control cable input lever on each flight control power control unit was locked at neutral and resisted any movement by the control cables. The force applied against this resistance was detected by force transducers mounted under the cockpit floor. Electrical signals from the force transducers were sent to the autopilot roll or pitch analog computers, processed with rate and angle limits, and output to the PCU servo valves to move the appropriate control surface. When the pilot force was removed, the computer either held the present bank or pitch attitude, or returned the aircraft to straight flight, depending upon sub-mode engagement. Watching the pilot fly the airplane in manual mode versus control wheel steering mode, it was normally impossible to see any difference in the pilot actions and results. By observing the autopilot engage switch paddle position, you could see whether the pilot was flying the airplane in manual, or utilizing the benefits of the electronic overseer. For its time, the Sperry SP-77/Boeing flight control system was nearly perfect.
@binzy96594 жыл бұрын
Great aviation vid Joe. Keep it up! Also thanks for doing my suggestion for a vid! 😁
@lpostert3 жыл бұрын
Joe, what an amazing video. I’m an Aeronautical Engineering student at the German military university in Munich, to become a military pilot. Basically, you just summarized what we had as an introduction to instrumentation and control engineering. Our professor used to work for Airbus and therefore he took the Fly by wire-system as an example to explain how control loops work. I’m amazed that you addressed so many details in a video that is not primarily intended for engineering students. I think your content is extremely helpful for anyone seeking to deepen their knowledge in aviation and I’d be lying if I said that your educational and motivational videos hadn’t been very helpful to myself to keep on going when university gets tough. Thanks for your awesome work!
@Emirates-uo1md4 жыл бұрын
Hey! Thanks for explaining that.. I always wondered what that meant 😃
@mugofbrown62344 жыл бұрын
I did something vaguely similar; I drove a brand new Discovery around an off road course; brilliant! Buttons, bells and whistles, all mod cons. I then drove an old Defender. I ordered the Defender. It was old, clunky, required definate arm and leg input, but you could feel what the terrain was like and where the Landy wanted to go.
@Glen.Danielsen3 жыл бұрын
I love this pilot of pilots! He brings the depths of aviation right to your eyes. 💛🙏🏼
@yutahestifirmani76843 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much captain joe for your videos is very great.
@captaincjh76254 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for making this video...I have always been confused with the FBW system. You’re like a aviation teacher god.
@teodorwrzoskowicz1204 Жыл бұрын
You helped me a lot with a flight tech school project about ATA 27 group (FCS). Thanks a million.
@M8K2E94 жыл бұрын
Not a minute ago I was binge-watching your videos, and suddenly I got the notification. Believe me...For a second I thought youtube was spying on me
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@vincentgrass65314 жыл бұрын
Well technically they can know what you watch, it's how you get personalized recommendations
@johnsonof44 жыл бұрын
Joe is the only Aviation teacher that I've known of since 2019, I'm also watching this Video While reading the Fundamental of flight book. His channel will always inspire me and increase more of my knowledge.
@danielmazin61534 жыл бұрын
The one by John Anderson?
@hao64854 жыл бұрын
Question for joe: Do you think the airbus cockpit is easier to fly than the Boeing (in terms of space and comfort)?
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
Yes I do
@matthsini4 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe Is it because you flew Airbus before Boeing? (Or Maybe you also flew Boeing before the A320?)
@adysoferu3 жыл бұрын
@@matthsini As far as I know, the 747 was his first Boeing, after the A320. But regarding the comfort in the cockpit, you can check the video where he and Dutch Pilot Girl compare the A320 and 737, where you have a more direct comparison with arguments from pilots from both sides.
@DrFrank-xj9bc4 жыл бұрын
You got a beautiful Oldtimer, with beautiful instruments - RPM and speedo - from VDO, very nice!
@brunogasperin4 жыл бұрын
That is pure gold! Thanks for all the knowledge!
@patolt16284 жыл бұрын
Advantages and disadvantages are quite right and objective. I really like your videos. Perfect.
@aleccross35354 жыл бұрын
I wonder what becomes of Joe's face everytime he sees an A320 while in the cockpit of a 747. Cheers, Joe
@mark-ish4 жыл бұрын
"I use to fly that lil mosquitoe" 😚😄
@xiaofengzhang3674 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@JacobDlougach4 жыл бұрын
“How do you do, fellow kids?”
@Horstroad4 жыл бұрын
12:42 McD followed with the MD11 in 1990. The MD11 was a FBW/FBC hybrid. Control wheel inputs in manual flight were transmitted digitally. Feedback was given via the cables. The elevator inputs are assisted in the neutral position. With no inputs, the elevators are automatically moved within 5° to keep the aircraft attitude stable. With the autopilot engaged, it's full FBW. The Flight Control Computers (2 pieces with 2 channels each, so four channels in total) control only one of the four actuators (four ailerons, four elevators) dependent on what channel is in control. The other three actuators of the ailerons and elevators are slaves driven by the linkages and cables that connect them all together. Theses cables and linkages also give feedback to the pilots. The 777 is full fly by wire. There are 16 position transducers on the control wheels/columns/pedals (6 for the control wheel (3 each for CM1 and CM2), 4 for the pedals (2 each for CM1 and CM2) and 6 for the column (3 each for CM1 and CM2)). They provide analog signals for the ACE (Actuator Control Electronics, 4 units) which convert these analog signals to digital. These digital signals are sent to the Primary flight computers (3 units) where they are processed with protection functions, stability augmentation and stuff like that. The processed signals are then sent back to the ACE and to the Autopilot Flight Director Computer. The ACEs convert the digital signals back to analog and send them to the control surfaces. The AFDC send the signals to the backdrive actuators on the control wheel/column/pedals for the protection functions (for example bank angle protection or tail strike protection). This is in normal manual mode. In secondary mode, when the PFC lack some information or have internal faults, some functions are not available (for example autopilot, envelope protection, thrust asymmetry compensation), but the PFC still process the digital signals and send them back to the ACE. In direct mode, when the PFC are not available at all, the ACE send the input signals straight to the control surfaces without processing. When the autopilot is active, the autopilot commands are sent from the AFDC to the PFC where they are processed and sent further to the ACE where they are converted to analog signals and sent to the control surfaces. The AFDC also send commands to the backdrive actuators on the wheels/columns/pedals for feedback. When all electronics fail, there is only pitch trim left for pitch control and two spoilers, one on either side, for roll control. These are the only actual mechanical controls left. The Control wheels/columns/pedals are mechanically linked together, so the L/H side always knows what the R/H side does and vice versa.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
No mechanical rudder control?
@Horstroad4 жыл бұрын
@@tomstravels520 There's no mechanical backup for the rudder on the 777. When you lose the ACEs you have only the horizontal stabilizer trim and two spoilers for attitude control.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
@@Horstroad hmmm interesting. The A320/A330/A340 I believe have mechanical stabiliser (provided the correct 2 hydraulic systems are working) and rudder. Any other turn co-ordination is through asymmetric thrust The A380/A350 are completely different and use a Backup Control Module which is segregated from the normal system but does require a hydraulic system (Yellow only on A350) to be functioning as the power source but you can still maintain control of the THS, inboard ailerons, elevators (inboard only on A380) and rudder. It’s basically a non mechanical system
@ricardoedelmann4 жыл бұрын
"Der Mann hat Geschmack" Nice little Red Machine in the beginning and great informative video as always!
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
Thanks buddy
@ricardoedelmann4 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe You're welcome! Correct me if i'm wrong because i'm not entirely sure but isn't that a 930 2.7L ? :)
@cameronsmith52074 жыл бұрын
Awesome video love the March keep up the great work
@PilotStudd4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Joe, I’m working on a qualification project (EPQ) in college, regarding the automation and technological advancements of aircraft from 1912- the future, this will certainly be a good source of information for the segment on fly by wire controls! Keep it up :)
@discoverlight Жыл бұрын
So spot on explanations. Leaves me out of questions. Everything g so clear, I’m just an aviation geek.
@yulaviation38684 жыл бұрын
Another great vid joe!
@024HR4 жыл бұрын
@Just Jeb True
@thetomgamerboi68174 жыл бұрын
You are first! good vid tho i agree
@yulaviation38684 жыл бұрын
@Just Jeb But it’s a captain joe vid. It’s gonna be good for sure
@024HR4 жыл бұрын
@@yulaviation3868 Yeah Thats For Sure
@FranklinDBluth-yq6ww Жыл бұрын
Thanks. That was super clear. I always thought fly by wire was talking about the shape of the wings in relation to the tail.
@brad40574 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video loads of info we are always learning..im wired
@haithamayyash24544 жыл бұрын
Your vidoes are why i am so into aviation, and i am loving it
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
Means a lot thanks!
@egilll884 жыл бұрын
You are my most favourite KZbinr🤩🤩🤩
@estebanamador76014 жыл бұрын
Nice Porsche!!! And really great video, thanks. Greetings
@jasonplays17764 жыл бұрын
Hey Captain, hope you are well! I was just wondering, are there any major differences between the fly by wire system and the CWS (Control Wheel Steering) autopilot mode on a Boeing aircraft in terms of flying characteristics? Thanks, Jason
@rexnihilum7822 Жыл бұрын
i'd love to know thid
@emmanuelex4 жыл бұрын
No one explains stuff better than you Captain Joe. I appreciate you
@Marder1A14 жыл бұрын
Fly by wire is truly interesting
@moody14804 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@ZK-APA4 жыл бұрын
Yes one topic will come here that is sidestick vs yoke in an airliner. Sure yoke feels more natural but a sidestick makes more sense as it makes the cockpit more comfortable and practical, especially when considering that flying is more of automation in an airliner.
@lime31074 жыл бұрын
What we all have been waiting for without even knowing it
@EmilSvitek4 жыл бұрын
Hi bro!
@lime31074 жыл бұрын
@@EmilSvitek - Hey another Lime
@rofaidarashed21264 жыл бұрын
As usual useful video , and comment to your viewer , thanks Mr. Joe
@ammarjamil41494 жыл бұрын
The future is here😁
@xiaofengzhang3674 жыл бұрын
Are you a fake Elon Musk ? Your video doesn't sound like the real one.
@aliibrahim-io7ki3 жыл бұрын
we are always enjoying with your clarification . Many thanks capt. Joe
@DarkniteAviation4 жыл бұрын
Hey, can you please make a video on the touchdown zone/aiming zone, explaining where pilots are supposed to land and when the gears should touch the runway etc Thanks, your videos are really informative! Also, why don't you use a custom channel URl lol
@Kucho294 жыл бұрын
Not a pilot but always curious about this incredible machines work, thanks for always giving clear information!
@sogwatchman4 жыл бұрын
1:54 - Should that be FWB or FBW for Fly By Wire ?
@joegreenwood65514 жыл бұрын
FWB is absolutely not Fly-By-Wire.....
@tingyangchang78224 жыл бұрын
@@joegreenwood6551 It seems that captain Joe had a wonderful day lol.
@Ah-fd7ip4 жыл бұрын
Joe Greenwood It is it should be FBW Fly By Wires
@ghomastottschalk16214 жыл бұрын
Fly-Wire-By doesn't seem right :D
@Chagenmelon6788 ай бұрын
Well explained captain! I think my little brother could even understand this. Great job!
@safetyinstructor4 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure but I feel like you wanted to show off with your Car ;) Greetings from Hamburg!
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
If I wanted too, I would have shown the full car like other pilots do.
@safetyinstructor4 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe haha true, and you would need a way more clickbaity thumbnail with a way cooler car than the one in the video.
@ΚυριάκοςΑλευράς Жыл бұрын
Thank you ! Υou are understandable, very good presentation!
@schulz.4 жыл бұрын
1:54 Isn't is supposed to be "FBW"?
@Haywood-Jablomie4 жыл бұрын
It's the Friends With Benefits system
@annemcquade71853 жыл бұрын
Thank you Captain Joe. Very interesting! 😘
@mattm25724 жыл бұрын
No please captain don't put a video online when I've an importante school teste to revise for tomorrow 😂
@MrPomelo5554 жыл бұрын
This is the reason why I started following Joe years ago. This is pure classical Captain Joe stuff. Fantastic work. Looking forward the next video, as I do wondered during the video « what happens if the computers fail? ». Thanks Joey.
@Digi203 жыл бұрын
depending on the aircraft, there sometimes is limited mechanical backup most commonly for the rudder and the horizontal stabilizer. that said, if the aircraft is so damaged that all redundant electrical and digital connections fail (that would mean no engine power, no apu, no battery power, no ram air turbine...or a fire in the avionics etc.) it will most probably crash anyway regardless of the control type.
@A2dy4 жыл бұрын
Now I want a video on your car!
@andrewkessinger59664 жыл бұрын
Good looking Porsche. Glad to be seeing your videos again
@Smartlion14 жыл бұрын
I like how he says "little cessna" I would love to see a big cessna
@firmaneffendi28014 жыл бұрын
Cessna cititation then
@Smartlion14 жыл бұрын
@@firmaneffendi2801 no something bigger. A cessna c380. A cessna version of the a380
@firmaneffendi28014 жыл бұрын
@@Smartlion1 chestnut then XD
@noahsaunders39192 жыл бұрын
11:48 Not only was the Avro Arrow FBW with force feedback it was also designed with Inherent stability in the Yaw-axis controlled by solid state computers (calculators today) as well as Marginal stability in the Pitch Axis both of which wasn't seen in military production aircraft until the F-16 & F-18 arrived.
@unityaviation50104 жыл бұрын
Also here's a suggestion: MFS2020 747-8 landing challenge.
@flywithcaptainjoe4 жыл бұрын
I rather do it in the real plane😉
@unityaviation50104 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe Oh ok. That would be an amazing video! You could do a Boeing 747 tour. If you haven't already though.
@NiHaoMike644 жыл бұрын
74 Gear tried it and found it wildly inaccurate.
@unityaviation50104 жыл бұрын
@@NiHaoMike64 Yeah because his 747 was bouncing at 120 knots. My suggestion wasn't good.
@unityaviation50104 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe Can you help my new Aviation Channel? It only has 13 subs, and if you want to go to it, search up cessna 172 descent and landing. Just wondering. You don't have to.
@sylvainalarie69084 жыл бұрын
Excellent video Capt. Joe!! I am a flight controls system engineer with 30 years experience, and have certified multiple FBW FCS systems for manufacturers around the world. You did a very good job at explaining the principles and keeping it in layman’s terms (otherwise it can get very complicated and nauseating). I don’t think I could really come up with negative comment on your work :). One thing you didn’t touch on, perhaps on purpose lol, is the whole debate on who should have ultimate authority of flight safety - the system or the pilot? It may have died down somewhat now, but there used to be an argument that pilots know best and should be allowed to break the aircraft if they see fit in a situation, and there have been cases where this has proven true. I guess you somewhat touched on it in discussing force feedback in controls. Congratulations again; I’m looking forward to the next one. Cheers!!
@raznet7774 жыл бұрын
1:52 the acronym had a typo lol
@ag63713 жыл бұрын
FBW
@rkbys52973 жыл бұрын
Your video helps not only pilots but also many of engineers
@Sterlingjob3 жыл бұрын
You don’t need to know this level for flying or engineering. If a box goes down another box takes over. In 10 years I’ve never seen an elac problem, usually it’s sec3
@byjustxs13094 жыл бұрын
I think I’ve never clicked on a video this fast :D
@sullyobrain552 жыл бұрын
Great explanation captain Joe😎
@samthomas94454 жыл бұрын
Captain Joe and Sam Chui collab maybe? Maybe that's already a thing IDK
@Hans59584 жыл бұрын
Chui is overrated
@mojamoja39623 жыл бұрын
@@Hans5958 Chui has social videos more than technical and he is likable. You can tell from his hosts whenever he is filming.
@tffexx4 жыл бұрын
Very informative like every video
@niallwalsh20274 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know I was this early
@Lorenzoavition6 ай бұрын
I have flown in a piper full motion sim, and yes, while I was in it, I always had to have power, and keep my hands on the yoke just to keep it stable, so definitely fly by wire is way better.
@strawberryj71864 жыл бұрын
omg this seems scary to me.. how it could fail seems like less control of aircraft I know they got that backup but relying on signals... scary haha
@leannexu33624 жыл бұрын
That’s actually why the Boeing 737 Max failed
@lumpichu4 жыл бұрын
I'd say it's potentially much more reliable than the pulleys. The old system has also wires, but so many more things that can get stuck :)
@penguinm16a142 жыл бұрын
Great video keep it up your channel is so dang entertaining and very excellent quality
@Bea-zn6vx4 жыл бұрын
I was literally thinking about u 30mins ago
@FesixGermany4 жыл бұрын
I had a general understanding about the system but yoour explanatiion went into way more detail (compensation and stuff), thank you!
@francisgaliegue66454 жыл бұрын
Now you've done it. You'll have to do four other videos explaining what are stall, overspeed, spin and overbank... You _did_ do it on purpose, didn"t you? :p
@gabrielsimon79444 жыл бұрын
A stall is when the stream of air flowing over the wings “detaches” from the wing and turns from laminar flow to turbulent flow. The rest are pretty self explanatory.
@francisgaliegue66454 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielsimon7944 sorry but no, this does not explain anything at all. I know about Navier-Stokes equations, which ultimately describe all of these phenomena, but knowing about the theory and how it translates into the real world is quite different...
@patolt16283 жыл бұрын
@@francisgaliegue6645 I don't understand what you are expecting. Stall as explained by many pilots (and Gabriel Simon) is clear. What happens in the real world? The airplane simply falls down since there is no more lift. No need of equations to understand that. Spin is an asymmetrical stall: one wing stalls before the other and the aircraft goes into a spin (there are many videos dealing with this physical phenomenon). Overspeed and overbank are self meaning, aren't they?
@ManfredVonRichtoffen3 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see a general description of avionics for the B 737 and then more in depth by system
@dee-jayonyango3 жыл бұрын
I know this is an immature joke but I very young so I was like, Wut da 5:25
Was that Steve at the beginning? ❤️Wonderful video, as always 😍😍
@mursaleenbhatt3 жыл бұрын
Well u are such an inspiration of many keep going sir 👨✈️👨✈️👍 love from kashmir
@justinnie59794 жыл бұрын
Love your videos Joe👍
@boeing-ys7wr4 жыл бұрын
Hi captainjoe, could you make a video explaining how the rudder pedals on the a320 work? I heard that they do not directly control the rudder but rather command a whole bunch of control surfaces to perform a side slip without any other pilot input?
@topethermohenes76583 жыл бұрын
I'm not 100% sure but unlike the sidestick the rudder on an airbus is mechanical. That's why it's strongly advised NOT to use the rudder in flight because you will induce an uncoordinated action. Use the rudders on the ground on landing and takeoff roll and before touchdown when correcting a crab angle approach
@tentingaroundflorida4 жыл бұрын
Glad your finally uploading new videos
@privskorp.98654 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much Prof. Joe
@souptonuts4 жыл бұрын
I fly a fair amount for business and have noticed the "smoothness" or efficiency I guess of Airbus equipment as well as the 777. Now I know why. Thanks for another great video.
@aashirkhan56504 жыл бұрын
Another awesome and informative video Joe!! Keep up the amazing work and thank you for taking the time to bring u these videos!! Hope you and your family are staying well and safe during these difficult times
@IsmailNPU4 жыл бұрын
Love you very much . I am inspired so much just by you. Love you always from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
@angelaf.26763 жыл бұрын
Sei veramente esauriente nelle tue spiegazioni,adesso nn ho più paura di volare, grazie te..
@stoeiboy804 жыл бұрын
the explenation.. so clear as water!! keep up the good work!! 👍😊
@r.redlaff50754 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for a video about this for a while. Really well explained. thank you
@gonetoearth25883 жыл бұрын
great content on this channel! As a pilot, I would love to see more cockpit vids showing CRM during departures and arrivals with checklists run etc etc Thanks!!