How far can Audi Q6 e-tron quattro go if we obey the speed limits?

[@FajnieBylo]

Honestly... could be my dream car on used marked in couple of years. Way to go Audi!

[@bneyarb5037]

Exactly this! The fat etron is half the price on the used market in 3-4 years in Australia. This will be the bargain of the century in 2-3 years.

[@lt6532]

The A6 will be much nicer. Avoid stupid SUVs...

[@bneyarb5037]

@@lt6532 the current combustion A6 doesn’t even get air suspension in Australia. That’s really my decider. There’s just no comparison to air suspension. Which is why Björn considers this, the fat etron, the IX, etc, to be THE most comfortable cars out there

[@lt6532]

@bneyarb5037 That's a fair point. I have always assumed the A6 will have air suspension as an option. But time will tell.

[@bneyarb5037]

@@lt6532 here’s hoping. They brought the new A5 up half a segment so hopefully they do the same with the A6 and give it air suspension

[@Bud_Terence]

Thx Björn, for the round trip. Very nice scenary. Also, well done Audi. Finaly better efficiency. 👍

[@crestas9]

Still not good efficiency for a 2024 released car with many years of development.

[@Bud_Terence]

@@crestas9 It's a brick, you can't expect wonders. For what it is, it's decent range.

[@daggy72-it]

I am so happy YOU are so enthousiastic about this car. I can not wait for mine (Q6 S-line full opt.) to arrive; it is in fact in production this week I saw on the Audi Portal.

[@eivindhelle3985]

The only thing i wish they would have kept from the original etron is physical buttons on the steering wheel. The touch pad buttons feels a bit cheep. And you are no longer able to get the "night vision" camera. Besides that the only problem is that the car is bit too expensive.

I drove through this area on my way back from Lofoten with my Tesla MYLR. I have to say that Norway is the country with the most beautiful nature in Europe!

[@matthiasw.347]

Thanks testing. I will get exactly this model on Monday next week. I am excited…

[@XENONEZZ2]

Great video....good car ....scenic views....Norway is a very beautiful country. I've been on holiday there twice.

[@Trades46]

Not sure about the Q6, but the official literature of the Q4 and Q8 both say Audi targets a constant 30deg C battery temperature target for optimal performance in driving and fast charging. So even in my Q4 i notice short trips in under 20deg C ambient temperature the power efficiency is low as it seems like the car actively preconditions the battery pack always even during 10min drives. When ambient temps hot 20deg or above, the efficiency skyrockets. My friend who has a Toyota bZ4x AWD gets significantly better power efficiency during short drives than I do in my Q4 e-tron quattro, but of course it DC fast charging is significantly slower.

[@davidstud3952]

With never exceeding 90km/h I think I can squeeze out same km with a Etron-GT as well 👍

[@nakfan]

Amazingly Beautiful Countryside

[@marcoseirik]

Hope you get to test the Porsche Macan Turbo EV to get a feeling for how awesome a performance version of this platform can be.

[@Nigel8Chelsea]

Man, Norway seems like such a beautiful country.

[@nialli2000]

Bjørns Mango cabin stowage test is my new fave test. Banana box go home!

[@MAM-x3s]

Hi bjørn, thanks for this review. Would you pick this Audi over the Lotus Eletre?

[@Max-si8sy]

I didn’t drive the Q6 jet, but I tested the eletre. I personally was a little bit disappointed from this car. Compared to my current Q8 etron the suspension is by far not as refined, the rear end is not settled enough on bad roads and the wind / tire noise are way too much for this vehicle class. In stillstand the interior quality is superb, but going over bumps created in my test car rattling noises. I thought the Eletre would by my next car, but I turned away from it.

[@haaavardo]

Does it come with kick-sensor as extra?

[@hkad6252]

Yes it will get that feature.

[@hkad6252]

Yes it will get that feature.

[@chickensays]

I almost bought a fat etron but I couldn't fit my mangoes. Thanks Bjorn, I now know the Q6 is for me.

[@pokderf]

Great car! Unfortunately the Audi business Leasing is not competitive!

[@OyiboVFX]

Just curious what Car Scanner app you are using??

[@AA-qg2hu]

Norway is the natural beauty Final Boss! ❤️

[@olec.salomonsen9716]

What color is this car? Manhattan or Daytona grey?

[@cedarcanoe]

I wish BMW would have updated and further developed the i3

[@Tobi3425]

In china there is a new i3. But it is a real 3 series.

[@illiaal1268]

Nice trip! Numbers don't matter, I'm just vibing=D

[@9SuperPav]

Nice Skoda.

[@KevinT3141]

I don't understand those blinking icons above 'Long- term memory' on the dash. Is it telling you that it has no love for stop signs? That would be so annoying in the corner of my eye while driving for any length of time, let alone on a long road trip.

[@Gurkensalatiser]

just tires and rims on Björns Q6 are +1,5 kWh/100 km cosumption in comparison to the 18/19 inch stock wheels. I would be mad to pay 2500 Euros extra to get less range! (18,6 kWh/100 km vs 17,1 kWh/100 km WLTP)

[@adammaysz5535]

Audi q6 quattro or new nio el8 ??

[@konsul2006]

8:07 Why do you have one side at 16 C and the other side at 23 C? Dual zone climate.

[@bjornnyland]

My mistake

[@maxknudsen1342]

@@bjornnyland Do you think it contributed to the higher than expected initial consumption?

[@hivewatch]

Thanks Uncle Bjorn!

[@RokinLee]

Hey Bjorn what’s your thoughts on rear motor 100kwh battery? Smaller 19s wheels should approach 4kw per mile. Underpowered? Don’t really need 4wd for Uk. Guess lower spec model loses air suspension too.

[@rainersta7073]

Yes....without air suspension. You have to make a test drive if airsuspension is worth the additional charge. Guess yes.

[@hardykornfeld1733]

Nice car but efficiency is still not good enough for me. Rather than thinking about best case, I like to consider the worst case (winter) and the goal of only charging to 80% if I own the car and want to preserve the battery. My i4 e40 unusually gets 4.2 mi/kWh (148 Wh/km) in mostly highway summer driving, but that falls to about 3.5 mi/kWh (177 Wh/km) in winter. Lower if the temperature is below 10 F (-12 C). I’m interested to see how efficient the upcoming Lucid SUV will be.

[@dennisman7159]

New test created. Centre console mango challenge 🥭😂

[@AuToDiStRuCtOr]

You should try the performance version too when it comes out

[@bjornnyland]

Already booked SQ6 press car.

[@AuToDiStRuCtOr]

@@bjornnyland can’t wait to see how the SQ6 performs too!

[@ranzzz2499]

@@bjornnyland Very nice. I'm interesting SQ6. It's coming to the USA soon.

[@matthiasw.347]

@@bjornnyland you did understand wrong. The „performance“ version is on level below, with only rear drive.

[@achtungpolizei7614]

Nice shots. Interesting car.20“ in combination with new motors seem to be efficient and competitive.

[@Maarten_vd]

@@achtungpolizei7614 efficient?

[@achtungpolizei7614]

@@Maarten_vd It’s a huge spacy 2.6t SUV with not best drag coefficient. I think this is quiet efficient. What’s your point then. Let me know if you want.

[@Maarten_vd]

@@achtungpolizei7614 my point exactly, it's 2.6t. Because it's inefficiënt, they has to fix the car with a heavy battery to give it a range comparable with competition. It's also not so spacious with 526 L cargo space ( model y 864 L)

[@achtungpolizei7614]

@@Maarten_vd I agree. That’s why I drive a Tesla though but in my opinion not comparable. Q6 is premium somehow. It’s another league. Has air suspension and it’s a lot quieter.

[@m.h.9244]

​​@@Maarten_vd864l 😂 model y 9+1 Boxers Q6 10+1. Do me a favor and don't believe everything the manufacturers say, no matter which manufacturer

[@danielcostia4330]

I am a bit confused by how the remaining range in km is calculated. At 15:17 the car has 35% battery left and a range of 252km with average consumption of 20.0. At 18:09 (you drove approx 60 km downhill). The avg consumption decreased to 17.4, you have 32% battery left (you used only 3% of the baterry) but the car is showing a range of 166 km.

[@Das-Radio]

Vorsprung durch Technik

[@BillB33525]

I see you charged it on 400V charger at the end of the video. My Taycan gets 150kW on a TSuC Magic Doc dispenser so maybe this car will get that speed over here in the US. I see that the High Speed receptical is in the same place as Tesla Cars. So just back into a TSuC stall just like a Tesla car. I am so excited to see this car in the US! I will probably trade my Q8 for this car when it gets here.

[@mahu142]

I've read that Tesla will build a Supercharger in Jesshome with 20V4 superchargers. Do you already know where?

[@bjornnyland]

Rema 1000 just 1.4 km away from my home.

[@manatic4063]

16 degrees on drivers side and 23 on passenger side... not ideal, but not many meters in range missed, still not optimal. ;)

[@andersengelin2958]

I want one!!!

[@ericvet8b]

Can’t believe I’ll be there around those roads and landscape in a few days!! Was that near Flåm Bjorn? Great car BTW.. 😊

[@trondsinepost]

No, this is mainly a valley named Gudbrandsdalen. The E6 from Oslo.

[@u.wunschel7311]

Q6 is NR.1 😍

[@fritslevie4461]

In price. €80.000,- is way to expensive.

[@Fry3199]

​@@fritslevie4461have you ever bought an Audi? You will get at least 10 to 15% off in the next month. This car is highly competitive

[@binflydushy]

@@fritslevie4461It is top notch technology what do you expect? Can’t have a 100kWh battery, 280kW charging and premium features for 50.000€…

[@fritslevie4461]

@@binflydushy I know but I think it will not be a big seller for that amount of money. Audi is not having an easy time as a company at the moment. I hope they will survive.

[@bavariancarenthusiast2722]

Good car - awesome review and tests - the gold standard for EV´s you find it here people!

[@Robis-]

so it's better than Tesla Y?

[@lt6532]

Lol. The ride is in a different league. Then again, most cars are better than MY here...

[@Fry3199]

Some people in the comments do not know the difference between power consumption and efficiency. The Q6 is obviously the most efficient BEV, as it has very low power consumption even with a high roof line and weight and the Cw value at 0.28. It is more efficient than a Tesla Model Y, that has lower power consumption but also way lower drive resistances.

[@Maarten_vd]

@Fry3199 haha.... "the car is most efficiënt because the car has a ludicrous CW value.... " I think what you mean is; the drivetrain looks efficiënt because the car is build like a blunt pyramid. The car is still not efficiënt. Does not matter that the reason is, it's not efficiënt. That's why it needs such a big battery to achieve an acceptable range. Making it 300kg overweight, hurting it's efficiency even more

[@Fry3199]

@@Maarten_vd efficiency is output / input power. Power consumption is the input power * distance. Of course you get a smaller, lighter car with less power consumption, but that has nothing to do with efficiency. The Model Y has 300kg less weight, better cw and therefore lower power consumption, but not higher efficiency. Just drive the Q6 and you will find out how the additional 300kg bring a complete different car feeling.

[@andrewlarner6190]

I get your point. But for me it’s real world … how many miles per KWh but I would also judge does the car do the job I want it to do separately. Once I have done that I know which car is best for us …. Then my wife explains which one we are actually getting 😂

[@Maarten_vd]

@andrewlarner6190 ok, let's turn it around. Bjorn tested the Model Y RWD and found its range to be 450 km, which is lower than the Q6's 572 km. However, the Model Y has a 57 kWh battery. If it had the same 94 kWh battery as the Q6, its range would be close to 740 km. This shows a significant difference: 740 km vs. 570 km. The Model Y is 30% more efficient. That's a substantial difference for a car that is only marginally larger. The main factor impacting the Q6's range is its drag coefficient (CW value). The design prioritizes form over function, appealing to buyers who prefer the traditional ICE look and might not prioritize reducing their carbon footprint over the next decade. No judgment here-Audi needs to sell cars, and their customers place a high value on aesthetics.

[@Fry3199]

@@Maarten_vd as i said. Some people do not know the difference between efficiency and power consumption. I tried to explain 2 times. The Model Y has higher range per kWh, but not because of higher efficiency. Its because of lower resistance.

[@CristianEnacheRealtor]

So, no speed restrictions, just friving your style, slower or faster, as in real life, how many km as range you are getting? I have a Tesla Model S 2023 Long Range and on my daily driving, I get 192Wh and with its battery, I get 500 km on sport mode. If looking to get 600+km, I am just changing to chill. Never let me down. Perfect daily driver, family car, sports car, business car. Amazing car.

[@arhitektche]

I tought that WLTP is like 629km, what this 555km ?

[@chengcao418]

mango test for interior review when?

[@wocket42]

Will mangos also replace the banana boxes?

[@ev.c6]

That infotainment system lag is a joke for a car this price.

[@matthiasmuller5173]

I wonder how you drive. With my old fat e-tron my lowest consumption was under 15kWh/100km. I drove over 560km without charging in E-Mode with climatecontrol Eco 21 degree. The trip goes from Berlin to Köln. I drove with ACC on, three bars distance, limit 100km/h and most of the time chilling behind a lorry driving around 90km/h.

[@johnnyboy7534]

Wow that's crazy good. We have a 2021 e-tron Sportback 50 with the camera mirrors and the best it can do is about 17kWh/100km. Still alot better than Björn's lol.

[@eddiehaug]

Driving behind a lorry will lower your consumption. Also there are lots of altitude variations along the route Bjørn is driving, he said himself in the video that would climb up to 1400mts over sea level.

[@matthiasmuller5173]

@@eddiehaug I think the 3 bars distance will minimize the aero effect to a minimum. And every think that goes up must come down :)

[@matthiasmuller5173]

@@johnnyboy7534 This was a degredation drive. I want to know how much energy is in the battery. Audi claims to drive at a speed around 80km/h dry condition and a temperature around 25 degrees. A very very long trip. Not my typical driving. My average consumption now is 23,5 kWh/100km over 90.000km at an average speed of 70km/h over this distance. I drive a 55 Sportback 2021

[@gw3563]

You are using smaller wheals Matthias.

[@quavohuncho6156]

You have what? 😦😦 8:07

[@robertmaxwell5829]

You live in beautiful place

[@wolfgangselle4307]

Yeah it looks really nice … almost like where i live right now. I live 1100m above sea level in the Rocky Mountains. And here it was in the last few weeks around 30° and above. Again by 1100m above sea level 😮

[@UgglemannenFTW]

The 360 camera should be better for this amount of money for something that should be premium.

[@quavohuncho6156]

yeah something like the Polestar 3 , 360 camera. Thats the best one

[@UgglemannenFTW]

@@quavohuncho6156 Yeah, this stuttering camera from Audi looks like something thats from 2016 or older...

[@terjesmork5439]

2,6 tonn for en bil som netto skal veie 2.325 tonn er ganske mye. Utstyr kan tydeligvis legge til mye vekt. Skal bli spennende å se på vekta når jeg får egen med maks utstyr, men da med 19" og uten glasstak.

[@ToreOnYouTube]

Seems like a good used car. Perhabs with 40-60k kilometers.

[@josefwurzel5072]

Konfuzius once said: OnlyFans better than no fans. A man of wisdom!

[@russellzauner]

*desire for Dakar model intensifies*

[@tarassu]

right seat was at 23 C. driver was 16C

[@bernardrr]

Mango test!

[@hitman2720]

Audi 👌

[@pegefounder]

What efficiency? Was Friday with my new Tesaly Y SR RWD from Grödig Austria to Altötting Germany with Sunday driving style with 118 Wh/km.

[@matthiasw.347]

Nice, but you still have (only) a Tesla 😜

[@BobBaumeister-g8v]

You compare Y vs Q6? Maybe model X vs Q6 is a better comparison?

[@pegefounder]

@@BobBaumeister-g8v The outer size matches the Y, the luggage volume is far smaller than at the Y.

[@BobBaumeister-g8v]

@@pegefounder more options for interieur and quieter so heavier and much bigger wheels.

[@pegefounder]

@@BobBaumeister-g8v Just looked: 69 db at the Q6, 70 db at the Y at 130 km/h. Very small difference. Nothing to justify the price difference.

[@WongJawa]

Really nice car but....still thirsty. They try to compensate that with a big battery?😂

[@BillB33525]

And very fast charging!

[@mfurmyr]

The navigation showed Bunker Oil. The software is also for fossil cars?😂

[@cedarcanoe]

No fan is better than only fans 🤣🤣

[@wocket42]

It's true, but there is no real world difference. At 100km/h and assumed 50 Watt consumption that's added 0,05 kWh/100km. That's below any measurement error. On a 50kWh battery and 15kWh/100km average at 100km/h, that's maybe 1km more range with no fans comapred to only-fans.

[@silverghini2629]

Why bother running without aircon? Am I so odd in leaving the climate control on auto the whole time? Surely, the car would turn off aircon if it’s not needed, especially if in Eco mode?

[@kinimod2712]

Vorsprung durch Klavierlack

[@josefwurzel5072]

Vorsprung durch überhöhte Leasingraten! (if looking at Volvos in Germany, I can get a comparable Volvo (list price) for HALF the rate)

[@leftcoaster67]

Cat massage would be fine.

[@tridruankham2657]

❤❤❤

[@linuxwarrior1]

RS-232 😂

[@ytl6674]

are people in europe really obey the speed limit in this nice country road? I guess there are no speed meter checks

[@wocket42]

More and more cars/drivers will as the speed warner is now mandatory and most people will not know how to turn it off.

[@hendrickginn3323]

It’s all about the mangoes

[@wocket42]

Don't buy electric cars without seat ventilation. I don't know why they would even sell them without. Even most old Ioniq classics have seat ventilation and apparently it's also an option on the Hyundai Inster.

[@simonsays911]

Ive got seat ventilation on my BMw i5 . Its next to useless . Same with the sunroof that doesn’t now open

[@marcmech1]

Buy Volkswagen stocks now?

[@swan83]

Why would you not obey the speed limits? We all want our kids and loved ones to be safe…

[@carlomorischi3435]

Still not efficient enough at high speed and in cold weather

[@carlomorischi3435]

That faulty Kempower charger that isn't able to charge at 800V is a joke.

[@Maarten_vd]

It's still very thirsty. Compare to the Model Y.

[@binflydushy]

Who asked?

[@Maarten_vd]

@@binflydushy I gave this info proactively, as people might ask themselves; is E-tron efficiënt now? Turns out, it's better than before but still very thirsty.

[@robertmaxwell5829]

Can't compare the ride quality

[@Maarten_vd]

@@robertmaxwell5829 that is absolutely true

[@paulburns3211]

Not bad … but it’s still a neutered Macan 4. If it’s all the same to you, I’ll go for the real thing.

[@swecreations]

Model Y RWD goes almost as far on 56.8 kWh as this goes on 94.3 kWh.

[@binflydushy]

Difference is the Tesla falls apart after you do it 10 times

[@H3aby84]

​@@binflydushyaccording to your fantasy right?

[@m.h.9244]

For Model y i find 2 resolut 450km and 550km in Björns xlsheet. But modely Performance went 590km. I get the Feeling this Test variats a lot.

[@swecreations]

@@binflydushy We have Tesla taxis here running in Sweden with well over half a million kilometers. Have seen ones with as much as 700k on the odometer.

[@UgglemannenFTW]

Its not like Audi got any good warranties etc... ​@@binflydushy

[@danielbergsten4977]

Ower 10000000nuk....ho cares....

[@danielbergsten4977]

I draw 850km with 7:27 1,02 kwh/10km to Day, normal drivning..

[@stiigern]

750.000 Nok starting price 🫠 Talk to me when it’s 500.000

[@Antraxx84]

Is this some peasant joke I'm too rich to understand?

[@samuelhollerud9395]

wait a few years and buy used 👍

[@Jajalaatmaar]

*Ahem* XpengG9 *ahem*

[@lt6532]

​@@Jajalaatmaar one does not simply buy Chinese cars...

[@PaperCoffeeTable]

One million with acceptable equipment level, Audistyle!

[@tridrean]

❤❤❤