Hello! We’ve put something together for you - a free guide for beginners that shows 80% of what you need to know about personal finance on 2 pages. You can get it here: makingmoney.email/80-guide-video
@harvtheworkload5 ай бұрын
that is a CRACKING shirt
@DanRobards5 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same! Hope they do a short sleeved one😂
@MakingMoneyPodcast5 ай бұрын
I have been searching high and low for one since the conversion.. Damo
@johnristheanswer5 ай бұрын
@MakingMoneyPodcast "conversion therapy" :)
@DeputyChiefWhip5 ай бұрын
Personal Finance should be taught in school as a GCSE. Wealth Inequality awareness should be part of it along with Mortgages, Rents, Loans, Pensions, ISA's, stock markets etc...
@toseeornot2see24 күн бұрын
If you did that in an honest fashion, people would become very conscious of how evil the system is in their teens! I mean with complete honesty where people explain what would happen if you get your first job straight out of university. Or should you decide to take up a trade. If you don't have supportive parents helping you early on, you are well and truly cooked.
@ohyeah28165 ай бұрын
The markets aren’t evil. The people are another matter.
@Abdul_Rahman865 ай бұрын
Amazing guest!!! Well done Damien!!!!!
@129Jayster5 ай бұрын
Dr. Phillip Roscoe is the coolest 😎
@aidanclarke76065 ай бұрын
That was very informative especially history wise. love all the podcasts but this one was an eye opener. Thank you.
@minimad87935 ай бұрын
Very much a worthwhile watch this one guys. I enjoyed the journey through the finance history. Very enlightening. thanks T and Damo
@TheLeonPrior5 ай бұрын
Nice to see Max and Lewis building bridges and exploring other avenues of work. Good for them.
@sgstuff-q8e5 ай бұрын
There is a KZbinr, Leeja Miller, who is a US lawyer. There is a very interesting video on her channel called 'The Secret Memo That Ruined Democracy'. it really opened my eyes to how we got to where we are today with regards to finance goals becoming paramount. Where Philip says "this is how finance has always been" (4:29) just shows how effectively these people (discussed in the referenced KZbin video) entrenched and embedded this idea into global society. It is not how it is has always been but they have now made it reaIIy hard to change.
@JoashD5 ай бұрын
Before I click like, I'm going to need link to where he got the shirt. Old boy looking butter- FLY AF!
@johnristheanswer5 ай бұрын
"Old boy" , probably 50 , tops. Ha.
@malcolmstonebridge79335 ай бұрын
The rivers were shocking previously, e.g. the River Tyne was dead in the 1970s well before privatisation. It's complex, e.g. huge population increase (and utilities will tell you how many people are really in the country), the handy side effect of building Kielder, etc. That is indeed an excellent shirt and that's to be expected because he went to Leeds.
@kr0505 ай бұрын
Yes. What was it that polluted the rivers before privatisation?
@malcolmstonebridge79335 ай бұрын
@@kr050 heavy industry and water boards (public structures) allowing rivers to be used as sewers.
@oxtt43145 ай бұрын
The answer is yes. Financialisation is the problem. Read Grace blakley's books. Or Naomi Klein's. If wealth is ever to find it's way back to ordinary society, we need a wholesale economic change.
@JumpDog985 ай бұрын
Or the Bearded Santa's numerous publications
@oxtt43145 ай бұрын
@@JumpDog98 Santa is bearded. Beards and Santa are ubiquitous. Why call him bearded Santa. Just Santa will do
@kr0505 ай бұрын
Thomas Piketty, Gary Stevenson too.
@robinhall34045 ай бұрын
Very interesting and plenty food for thought.
@FaustsKanaal5 ай бұрын
Takes some balls to say Thames Water is in a crisis not because of their own CEOs and board, but because indirect stockholders like me who own shares through a bank that owns part of it make any decision at all. Doest that go for all of the UK underinvestment and severely degraded infrastructure like your trains that arent even on par with post Soviet states? Or is that maybe a cope to blame foreigners rather than own up to British inability to manage and innovate.
@dec18755 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure he's blaming the system, not the actual investors. He also says the CEOs and board are incentivised to make profit regardless of consequence. There needs to be the threat of jail for corruption of this level really, but we are the only country stupid enough to sell our own water off to foreign wealth funds who don't care about the damage they do
@ThePirateParrot5 ай бұрын
If you take away from a discussion of deep systematic issues of corporate governance and the incentives created by the financialisation of public assets is not my fault it's a few bad apples you haven't understood what was said.
@mitchellfarmer56665 ай бұрын
This is the wrong take away. What he's saying is the system operates in such a way that it makes investors unwittingly complicit in infrastructural and industrial tragedy. By which I mean, investors want - as individuals - dividends, increasing share price, stock buy back, etc. However from a system perspective this translates to boards (responsible to shareholder interest) appointing CEOs who then make policies that target bottom line not company fundamentals.
@oxtt43145 ай бұрын
The other problem is that neoliberal economic theory is just that, theory. It is completely unrecognisable to reality, where the vast majority of people are too poor to be significant economic actors. The market is just a word to these people and they will never be able to participate.
@TheDarkInstall5 ай бұрын
Just because a person can not afford something, does not mean that the thing doesn't exist.
@oxtt43145 ай бұрын
@@TheDarkInstall that's not the thrust of my argument at all.
@TheDarkInstall5 ай бұрын
@@oxtt4314 what is the thrust of your argument?
@oxtt43145 ай бұрын
@@TheDarkInstall that in order for neo liberalism to work as intended, wealth needs to be much more equitably distributed. But it isn't and for most people neo liberalism is just a prison of poverty and exploitation. The only period in human history when worker's got a fairer share of the pie was during the post world war 2 consensus, under Keynesianism. Basically, unions need more power again and taxation on the super rich needs to be much higher along with expectations that for society to function properly, the private sector should contribute much more to paying for workers to get the skills they need to thrive in an economy.
@TheDarkInstall5 ай бұрын
@@oxtt4314 Thanks for taking the time to explain. I understand your point now. About the last point; you are saying that the private sector should pay to educate their own workers... this does happen already, if the worker is able to bring value to the company off the back of gaining the necessary training / qualifications.
@JumpDog985 ай бұрын
Re reparations for owners - allegedly a good portion of those reparations build contributed to the inheritances of David Cameron's family fortune