The first 100 people to download Endel at app.adjust.com/b8wxub6?campaign=thecoldwar_march&adgroup=youtube will get a free week of audio experiences!
@eustache_dauger2 жыл бұрын
Probably also worth examining how the British deny independence for its Borneo colonies of North Borneo & Sarawak, rather transferred their sovereignty (together with Singapore) to the newly independent federation of Malaya, a regional ally under the pretense of "communism threat in the region" thus forming Malaysia in 1963.
@theawesomeman98212 жыл бұрын
please cover South Africa
@enoughrope16382 жыл бұрын
I have to say that a a short while after gaining independence many of these former colonies proved that they indeed were not ready to govern themselves. This isn't racism but a fair assessment. I can give plenty of examples if you would like?
@keiththomas11802 жыл бұрын
Amazing coverage on a seldomly discussed topic
@Evolthions2 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@thenewjord502 жыл бұрын
We need more episodes on Africa, Caribbean, Latin America, Asia and Soviet republics other than Russia
@thenewjord502 жыл бұрын
@@garrettgentry4417 they all been affected by the Cold War
@saturationstation14462 жыл бұрын
if we do that then people will learn how bad eurocentric culture is compared to asian cultures. and if you do that you will upset the inbreeders. and the inbreeders egos is more important than the basic necessities and well being of the entire human species.. didnt you know that?
@thegodzillafan30002 жыл бұрын
@@garrettgentry4417 I disagree with the sentiment but that was funny as hell.
@ZZ-oc2eb Жыл бұрын
Definitely
@ZZ-oc2eb Жыл бұрын
Especially the Portuguese colonies who used the down of Portugal king and dictatorship to boost their own independence
@m2v-animatez2 жыл бұрын
GOD BLESS OUR HOMELAND GHANA AND MAKE OUR NATION GREAT AND STRONG. 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 🇬🇭 Happy Independence Day
@ibnurismail59642 жыл бұрын
Happy indepedenced day from Malaya which also get independence also in 1957
@brokenbridge63162 жыл бұрын
An excellent video. Not many countries have ever won their independence like this. And it's a shame too. Because way too many wars of independence happened in the latter half of the twentieth century. My compliments to all those who made this video a reality.
@ibnurismail59642 жыл бұрын
Malaysian here.Ghana@Gold Coast episode make me really remember how Tunku Abdul Rahman@Malaysia architect brings.Malayan independence and with diplomacy we succesfully Malayan(Now Malaysians penisular) United with British Borneo in 1963
@Mr.Nichan2 жыл бұрын
Was it really that rare, or do you just hear about the more violent ones more? There are an awful lot of countries that gained independence during the twentieth century.
@vasilerogojan45202 жыл бұрын
One notable information about Ghana is the fact that one of the few countries in Africa that is considered a democracy, a flawed democracy to be exact, and the only one in the central part of that continent.
@stefanodadamo68092 жыл бұрын
They had the luck of finding a quite competent strongman, not an insane tyrant or a crook: Jerry Rawlings. Surely not an ideal of exquisite democracy, but so much better than most Big Men down there.
@simbamartens71922 жыл бұрын
@@stefanodadamo6809 You do realise that Ghana has had multiparty democracy (not just strongmen) since the 1990's, with multiple handovers of power between different parties?
@simbamartens71922 жыл бұрын
Ghana is not in central Africa, but in West Africa and I'm pretty sure it's not the only democracy in the region, see Liberia, Senegal, Nigeria etc.
@stefanodadamo68092 жыл бұрын
@@simbamartens7192 I know that. Even Rawlings himself got re-elected once!
@Artur_M.2 жыл бұрын
I am lately very preoccupied with dramatic and tragic events going one just east of my country but this topic is also very interesting and important to understand. One thing I find peculiar about Ghana is the choice of the very name of the country. The historical Ghana Empire was located north of the modern country, not overlapping with it, and essentially had nothing to do with it. As I understand, this choice was an expression of Pan-Africanism and attempt to not favoritise or offend any of the ethnic groups within the country. I believe Benin is a similar case.
@NeinSquared2 жыл бұрын
The correlation between the empire of Ghana and the state of Ghana is that a significant amount of Ghanaians are believed to have migrated from the former location of the Ghana empire (the specific group being the Akan). The next reason was this idea that one day Ghana would be able to eventually live up to that name.
@可爱包-c4v2 жыл бұрын
As far as I know, only the Greeks forced other countries to change their names.😂😂😂
@Artur_M.2 жыл бұрын
@@NeinSquared Thank you. The Akan connection is very interesting.
@isaactomangrief91582 жыл бұрын
One major connection is the Soninke, the ruling 'tribe' of the Ghanian Empire, who are now a major ethnic group in Ghana. As to Benin, the country was previously named Dahomey after the Dahomey Kingdom conquered by the French. The ruling tribe of the Dahomey had been the Fon and, after the French left, one of the powerful regional warlords was very much associated with the Fon. In attempt to make peace and centralise the country, they agreed on a new name that was ethnically neutral. Benin was the name of a powerful city-state in modern day Nigeria and Europeans had named the region 'the Bight of Benin' after it. Being as Dahomey was on the Bight of Benin, they decided to name it Benin.
@kofisam41062 жыл бұрын
@@NeinSquared the Akan connection to old Ghana is far from the truth.. the Soninke people of present day Mauritania and Senegal are the descendant of old Ghana.. the Soninke language is part of the greater mandinka languages. Bisa/busanga people are the only tribe in Ghana which are closely related to the Soninke people. There are other tribes in northern Ghana, who were duala tribes and are now assimilated to the Gur group of Ianguages. The dualas are also mandinka people, and related to the Soninke people. So there’s connection between old Ghana and modern Ghana but the connection is not through the Akans of Ghana and Ivory Coast but rather through some minority tribes in northern Ghana... By the way, I’m fanti, which is a subgroup of Akan.
@AlexVictorianus Жыл бұрын
This shows: education is so important to build a democracy.
@thethirdjegs2 жыл бұрын
somehow, the creative way of saying "press the bell button" is becoming more looked forward to as we go further.
@TheHypnogog2 жыл бұрын
Two thumbs up for the way Ghana and Great Britain handled that. Good history reporting, I learned a lot from it.
@aasemahsan2 жыл бұрын
4:13 Fante vs Ashanti (another example pf the British using divide & rule tactics) 10:25 The Burns Constitution (1946) 11:24 1948 Accra protests 12:20 UGCC (United Gold Coast Convention) 13:34 CPP (Convention People's Party) led by Kwame Nkrumah
@abedmarachli73452 жыл бұрын
English colonialism did not create these tribal problems, but rather benefited from them and often in other countries put them down, but in Africa in particular, tribal problems extend for hundreds of years under flimsy reasons.
@joshuafrimpong244 Жыл бұрын
oh no, the ashanti have always felt differently to the fante, even before colonial times
@vasilerogojan45202 жыл бұрын
So, this was about the history of the independence of Ghana with the background, for the geography you could check out the channel "Geography now".
@QuackAttack2 жыл бұрын
it is now March 6th (at least for me)... happy independence day Ghana!
@bernard87932 жыл бұрын
I am from Ghana🇬🇭🇬🇭✌🏿💥
@adriansz3432 жыл бұрын
Wonderful learning about your guy's independence, greetings from the USA!
@bernard87932 жыл бұрын
@@adriansz343 thanks man i love the USA!!!
@nicholasfowler89822 жыл бұрын
I am very grateful for this video kings and generals! learnt a lot video should have more than 1k likes
@tomalexander43272 жыл бұрын
This was excellent. Thank you.
@daffaalfarisy70862 жыл бұрын
Well finally, my favorite historical event is been brought by The Cold War Team. And obvs, its a nice video. But i find one mistake in 14:05 when you said Nkrumah was educated in US and Germany. Yes, he was educated in US during the great depression era which he saw as one of the most difficult time in his life (See Nkrumah's autobiography). But, it's not Germany which become his next stop for continued his study. Its UK precisely in LSE where he pursued his doctorate degree (You can see his memoir about his experience during his sojourn in London in his autobiography or in Yuri Smertin's book which call, "Kwame Nkrumah"). And maybe i want to add some information regarding this topic. First, bout Guggisberg role on political development is very true. But his contribution didn't stop there. He also led Gold Coast for economic and education development which gave a valuable benefited for Gold Coast. He also tied a friendship with one of the most Gold Coast nationalist leaders, Kwasime Aggrey which Nkrumah admire (even though he not fully agree about Aggrey view coz he view Aggrey to "moderate" on his struggle for independence). You can explor this information by reading some books like Gold Coast Survey or Contemporary Africa. Second, when Nkrumah was put behind the bars, there was a man who take a his mantle for campaigning his party during 1951 General Election. This young and briliant man is K.A. Gbedemah who become Nkrumah most trustworthy man in CPP. He also dubbed by many political expert as one of the most (or maybe the best (?) administrator in Africa (you can see this appraisal in John Günther's book, Inside Africa). Third and last but not least, the independence of Gold Coast which later renamed as Ghana (its a African name which also a name for an ancient empire in there) also marked an era for Ghana role in a struggle to help other Africa nations to breath an air of freedom. The first concrete action to achieve this goal is when Nkrumah and Ghana set up a Africa People's Congress on 1958 and followed by a creation of Union of Africa based on Nkrumah dream of a single Africa goverment (his dream wasnt been fulfilled coz a lack of cohesion or agreement between him and other Africa leaders). You can see Ghana role in Africa Independence movement by reading some of Nkrumah's book such as "Africa Must Unite!" or "I Speak of Freedom". You can also found these information in some journal on JStor. For example, there is a journal who talks about Ghana role in Cameroon Independence movement or in Algeria Independence Question. And also, you can visit my podcast, Podcast KAOS, to gain some information about history (but all of it i did in Indonesia language hehehe). Or maybe you can visit my medium (which share the same with my podcast) to read some of article which talks about various topics of history (and mostly it written in indonesian except one article).
@PP2662 жыл бұрын
Great stuff!
@MrAltairgaming2 жыл бұрын
Slightly correction: Nkrumah got his university education in the US and UK, not Germany
@kwesikwansakennedy21962 жыл бұрын
A Cold War video? On my own country? Popcorn wooooo!!
@incursus14012 жыл бұрын
Great video and thanks for the free content. One question to help me understand the national developments of post colonial africa: Was there any appeal to the pre colonial kingdoms and empires of ghana (Dagbon, Ashanti Empire etc.) in their rhetoric similar to European nationalism or was it more or less a new clean slate for rhetoric?
@zebraz38392 жыл бұрын
You should do more of these types of videos
@Monatio792 жыл бұрын
Ghana is like the kid who came top of his class, a model student and a shining example to all. Unfortunately, his peers would go on to screw things up in the worst possible way.
@imperialfootballleague78772 жыл бұрын
How so
@Monatio792 жыл бұрын
@@imperialfootballleague7877 Because Ghana is a paradise compared to what the rest of Sub-Saharan has gone through/continues to go through.
@MBP19182 жыл бұрын
Interesting video
@producedbyfieri Жыл бұрын
would have been interesting to see a follow up detailing how the CIA conspired to get rid of Nkrumah
@robertortiz-wilson15882 жыл бұрын
Obviously the time frame for independence got moved up significantly, but at the same time it clearly wasn't rushed in this instance! God bless, from USA!
@vasilerogojan45202 жыл бұрын
One thing is clear is clear in Africa, despite of the decolonisation there are still overseas territories around the continent and the neo colonialism of the other powerful countries, not only the former colonists but also the Russians and the Chinese.
@可爱包-c4v2 жыл бұрын
The number of China troops even is fewer than Anatolia (Turkey) in Africa.🤔🤔🤔
@abchaplin2 жыл бұрын
At 4:10, David mentions "the English Crown." It had been a de facto "British Crown" since James I & VI took the throne and a de jure since the Act of Union, 1707.
@andredeketeleastutecomplex2 жыл бұрын
Congrats but in 10 yrs tops IT WILL become the 'English' crown 💩
@abchaplin2 жыл бұрын
@@andredeketeleastutecomplex, I am afraid you may well be right.
@jeremybrett50762 жыл бұрын
I would like separate videos on the effects of "Bell Button" and "But" on the history of the Cold War. Please consider it.
@kicapanmanis10602 жыл бұрын
Just because they’re theme parks doesn’t mean they don’t want self rule. Wait, wrong coast…..
@kingdomofgarvin34322 жыл бұрын
Real Talk
@ghostwriterj94212 жыл бұрын
I come for the show, I stay for the bell button prompts
@blobloblaw122 жыл бұрын
I like the idea of the subscribe button pressing itself haha. But for the time being, I shall press the subscribe button for this channel myself.
@yunuenvargas9742 ай бұрын
Great video, do you have a source list for sources used for the video?
@arrow14142 жыл бұрын
These pictures at 11:31 look more like 1968 than 1948.
@berkleystreetcapital35882 жыл бұрын
Can you also do an episode on Battle of Algiers. Nyerere and south African apartheid and Belgium human rights abuses in Congo.
@robertwesley47802 жыл бұрын
At 11.39 you are talking about a group of WWII veterans, but the photo is of Jerry Rawling from the 70s or 80s
@julianshepherd20382 жыл бұрын
If the British could hand over to a ruling elite and still do business then why do you need an empire ?
@nihalbhandary1622 жыл бұрын
Congrats you have now described British India Company, that is exactly how it was under company rule in India. Company let the emperors maintain administration while the company only dealt business, company rule was more stable than under empire.
@resentfuldragon2 жыл бұрын
@@nihalbhandary162 and would have probably been sustainable to an extent to this day. Had they not humiliated and attempted to brainwash people instead of just control things through proxies they could have stayed so rich. A good thing though, they deserved to lose their lands after all they did including the sykes-picot agreement.
@cptrelentless800852 жыл бұрын
@@resentfuldragon the problems in the Middle East are entirely in the lap of the French. Syria was a French colony, heavily repressed with an armed insurrection. Like all the other French colonies. The French created Lebanon, angering the Arabs, they prevented the pan-Arabic kingdom as they believed it would be pro-British, they supported the Jewish groups (headquartered in Marseilles) and encouraged them to destabilise Palestine by sticking them on boats and sailing them to Haifa to make the refugees Britain’s problem, instead of France’s
@resentfuldragon2 жыл бұрын
@@cptrelentless80085 the french were the worst but second worst was easily britain. britain created israel, it partitioned somalia's lands among its neighbors leading to the concentration camps in kenya filled with somalis, it destroyed the mughal empire, it was the main force that took over the middle east in ww1, and much more. France is bad but they wouldn't have gotten the lands they did had britain not done what they did in the middle east first.
@randomlyentertaining82873 ай бұрын
The same kinda differences between renting a home and buying one.
@lima1533302 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about the first ghanian coup?
@tokysobukanla2 жыл бұрын
You should do the same type of video for Nigeria...
@可爱包-c4v2 жыл бұрын
It is very interesting to study the name of the country. As far as I know, Greece once forced northern Macedonia to change its name. Benin's name comes from an ancient country what In Nigeria.Gabon's name comes from an ancient country. The name of Chinese Han / China in Mongolian comes from 契丹 (an ancient country , most of its territory in China), 契丹 means China in Slavic and Central Asian languages, and 契丹 means Han in some minority languages in China. But I watched a historical video from Mongolia one day and I was very surprised to find that a Mongol claimed that 契丹 belongs to the history of Mongols, but today, Mongolia still call China ”契丹”.🥰🥰🥰
@ravensthatflywiththenightm73192 жыл бұрын
Even after WW2 and Britain still would not let go of its colonies...
@julianshepherd20382 жыл бұрын
When did anyone ever want to lose an empire
@resentfuldragon2 жыл бұрын
france is even worse, they still do stuff to this day just like they used to. They send troops to nations and steal their resources, and force ex-colonies to pay them including the poor ones like haiti.
@pecadodeorgullo59632 жыл бұрын
It was trying to dismantle slowly which isn't a bad move since it allows for reforms to happen and by the time of independence they'd be ready for it. Of course, this is if everything goes smoothly which almost never happens.
@ravensthatflywiththenightm73192 жыл бұрын
@@julianshepherd2038 Several times in history, usually after a large scale conflict. You should read sometime. :)
@ravensthatflywiththenightm73192 жыл бұрын
@@pecadodeorgullo5963 Aye, and unfortunately, Britain in particular's got a long track record of "dragging their feet", ensuring the worst possible scenarios are the result. Like what's going on there right now with how they managed the plague and the sudden influx of immigration.
@theoutlook552 жыл бұрын
Cool
@babayemiolumide3362 жыл бұрын
Talk about Nigeria's independent too
@johntheo57892 жыл бұрын
First on my Favourite channel,Yayyy 😜
@meejinhuang2 жыл бұрын
Let's count how many colonies won independence from the UK.
@russellgardener1262 жыл бұрын
6:37 - what is this battle footage being shown?
@vasilerogojan45202 жыл бұрын
I wonder how some people in the comment section will consider the fact that the nowadays country of Ghana has nothing in common with the historical country with the same name in the Sahel region.
@kofisam41062 жыл бұрын
Tell the people of America that, naming their cities, Philadelphia, New York, New Jersey, and new hampshire is also illegal.. for your information, the people of old Ghana were mandinka people, and currently their are indigenous mandinkas in northern Ghana, so there’s a link between the old and the new.
@jarazy12322 жыл бұрын
Geographically, modern Ghana has no ties to the ancient country, but there several tribes in the north of modern Ghana that claim to have migrated from the ancient Ghana empire.
@kevinobrien85452 жыл бұрын
What!??? David, you dropped your "outro" of the JFK quote!? Why?
@randomlyentertaining82873 ай бұрын
I see the purpose of the upload date 😂
@billballbuster7186 Жыл бұрын
Yes Ghana was the first African colony to gain independence and is one of the most successful. But the majority of black African countries reverted back to tribal rule and dependence on foreign aid.
@herzogsbuick2 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure who made the opening "soundscape", but for your sake I hope it wasn't Endel, unless you paid for science to make it annoying
@cheeseburgersarecool66004 ай бұрын
3:12 where they wrong though it's clear that one of the major shortfalls of Africa is its leadership
@bigsarge20852 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@sundalongpatpat2 жыл бұрын
Hope you could make a video related about the current events in Ukraine
@theoutlook552 жыл бұрын
It's not quite the Cold War though is it? There are echoes of it, sure, but I think this channel should keep to its focus. After all, there is no dearth of attention and historical perspectives analyzing and under analyzing the current crisis.
@Jay-ho9io2 жыл бұрын
They just did
@tng20572 жыл бұрын
The US’s post war policy of encouraging independence of various colonies had somewhat backfired. Despite the best efforts by the US administrations and the UK governments, nearly all post independence British colonies became anti-west, with Malaysia/ Singapore, Kenya and UAE being the only notable exceptions. This did undermine the west’s effort in countering Soviet/China influence around the world.
@saturationstation14462 жыл бұрын
i wonder why POC countries wouldnt like the west lmfao. could it be because we see everything that isnt rich and white as subhuman? could it be because we always show that our only intentions are to hold others down so we can use them for slave labor? hmmm
@jarrodyuki70812 жыл бұрын
no child policy for those below poverty and one child policy for those below median income.
@vasilerogojan45202 жыл бұрын
At least this former British colony didn't end in the same way as Cyprus with all the mess with the the UN intervention.
@theoutlook552 жыл бұрын
You mean with the Turkish military intervention? The UN just brokered the ceasefire.
@akhripasta2670 Жыл бұрын
@@theoutlook55 *and British keeping a piece of it
@-JA-2 жыл бұрын
👏
@juanjuri61272 жыл бұрын
Ghana: Now that I'm independent I'm gonna name myself Ghana, after the old empire located in modern-day Mali, with no direct ties to us Benin: Now that I'm independent I'm gonna name myself Benin, after the old empire located in modern-day Nigeria, with no direct ties to us Mali: Now that I'm independent I'm gonna name myself Mali, after the old empire located in modern-day Mali, with direct ties to us Ghana + Benin: Ghana + Benin: that's illegal
@kofisam41062 жыл бұрын
Tell the people of America that, naming their cities, Philadelphia, New York, New Jersey, and new hampshire is also illegal.. for your information, the people of old Ghana were mandinka people, and currently their are indigenous mandinkas in northern Ghana, so there’s a link between the old and the new.
@Terry-Oppong-RN2 жыл бұрын
You are wrong, some of the ethnic groups in modern Ghana trace their ancestry and migration from the old Ghana empire, don’t be ignorant
@theawesomeman98212 жыл бұрын
Cool fact, most Afro-Americans are genetically related to the people of Ghana.
@manovrsb2 жыл бұрын
Maybe cause those were the people who sold their ancestors to Europeans? It's not something we find cool.
@legendaryking9132 жыл бұрын
no shit
@lawrenceoyedele8782 Жыл бұрын
pls can you do an documentry on nkrumah on how he wanted to unite africa and how the cia destroyed him
@Mixcoatl2 жыл бұрын
3:13 - Sorry, but I disagree with this. Countries don't just spontaneously become well-managed democracies overnight. It takes time, and institutions need to be put in place to ensure that things don't fall apart afterwards. Surely the number of dictatorships and wars in Africa following decolonization proves that. Why is it this channel always tries to put the worst spin on things when it comes to the UK?
@jimmyrh2472 жыл бұрын
If you don't want to hear about a load of the background details, start watching from around 18:37.
@davidjohansson14592 жыл бұрын
Sverige har haft en koloni på Guldkusten 🥇. En handelsstation
@andredeketeleastutecomplex2 жыл бұрын
Anglos know not of fairplay, they just use the word when it suits them and no one else.
@The_Lucent_Archangel2 жыл бұрын
It's hardly "paternalistic" or "racist" to think that affording people who likely would have remained around a Bronze Age level of development had the colonial era not occurred, might need a bit more time to get ready to stand on their own. Given how disused and shoddy much of the infrastructure built during that era has become since and how often tribal wars have flared up to outright genocide among Africans without any hated "colonizers" around, the case can certainly be made. What's curious to me is the unilaterally negative, dim view this channel and others take of that timeframe and the rosy picture painted of "decolonization" in spite of how things have progressed since. Or the glossing over of the fact that the PRC as part of their Belt and Road Initiative has become the new "colonizer" in all but name without the sort of backlash and constant guilt heaped toward present day Europeans whose forefathers are painted as white devils that contributed nothing to the more developed and modern state of Africa, the Americas, and Asia. This is said by a descendant of a "colonized" people. I recall quite clearly how my mother reacted when I asked if we should resent the Spanish over their time holding Mexico (Nueva Espana as they called it) as a colony. She laughed it off and told me that from the Conquistadors to the war of independence, Spain had indeed committed atrocities and stolen resources for their own enrichment. But she then pointed out that our ancestors weren't developing or using said resources and routinely butchered or sacrificed one another along tribal lines for centuries immemorial before the Spanish arrived. And that without their intervention, we'd likely still be living in huts and trying to avoid being sacrificed on a stone altar with an obsidian knife. Same holds true with some altered specifics for other former colonies, but the prevailing popular narrative is to ignore any redeeming qualities and laser-focus onto the offenses. Just food for thought.
@scottkrater2131 Жыл бұрын
I can't speak about all Russians, but the last Russians I did talk to were just as racist as as any white supremacists in the US.
@tobilobaokorodudu95942 жыл бұрын
Here come all the racists about to infest this comment section. 🙄
@TheSheepPimp2 жыл бұрын
Are you one?
@017264635052 жыл бұрын
@@TheSheepPimp He can't be. He have no POWAH!
@rithinkrishna28172 жыл бұрын
First comment
@raybarry43072 жыл бұрын
If you look at the economic track record of former British colonies since their independence I'm not so convinced there was as much Paternalism or racism as is often thought. These countries were like 17 year olds that are screaming for independence from parental control and decide to move out the day after graduation into their own place only to find that electricity food and rent are actually Really hard to do so they move back home. I know in 2022 this is a forbidden opinion to have but Imperial colonies helped far more than hurt the people that lived there. At least the British ones.
@simbamartens71922 жыл бұрын
Virtually every British colony is much boff after independence than under colonialism by almost any metric. Many countries went through periods of decline and instability immediately after independence (not helped by Cold War interventions),but since the 1990's countries like Ghana have embraced multiparty democracy and experienced phenomenal economic growth. Only a handful of countries are worse off now than before independence e.g. Zimbabwe
@tobilobaokorodudu95942 жыл бұрын
Its an unpopular opinion because its untrue. By almost every metric, living standards, literacy rates, life spans excetera, have improved greatly upon independence from the leeches.
@raybarry43072 жыл бұрын
@@tobilobaokorodudu9594 It's just astounding to hear you use literacy rates as a metric seeing as the British found the country an 99.99% illiterate rate backwards country and actually taught the people to read so that by the time they left a great deal of the population was literate. They also left them with such trivial things as hospitals and running water, a deep understanding of the most useful language in the world, a sewage system and electricity. In short the British turned them in to a modern people. You're welcome by the way.
@tobilobaokorodudu95942 жыл бұрын
@@raybarry4307 You can keep deluding yourself against the fact, it still doesn't change anything. When the leeches left standards of living began to rise by a wide margin.
@raybarry43072 жыл бұрын
@@tobilobaokorodudu9594 What fact??? Your whole argument is they were all better off when the British left. Why? Well just cause. That's not a convincing argument. Like most ppl with this opinion I've talked to your whole argument is based purely on emotion. 🙄
@yinrichard68082 жыл бұрын
Why does he have to say "there's always a but" Its very annoying to hear it when it's repeated too many times!