How have the Balance Changes Affected the PvP Meta?

[@Metagross31]

Interesting video :) Would also be cool to see, how you would currently rank all the different decks.

[@Eirias_h4]

Alright, if this tier list video does well then perhaps I'll make a deck tier list :)

[@Ceco.O.G.]

Great video !

[@Eirias_h4]

Thanks :)

[@weak1ings]

I haven't really played PVP in a long time, imo the new Mountain Rowdy is a lot worse for the niche I had going for the unit, in the games I've played I seriously miss the damage reduction mainly and its inferior counter.

[@Eirias_h4]

Interesting perspective! I can say as a fire/shadow t1 player, however, the card makes it much riskier to defend t1 vs t2 (previously imo it was pretty easy to do).

[@weak1ings]

@@Eirias_h4 Yup, to me his primary role was a tank for my weaker using his area denial and brutal toughness. Shielding my war eagles or singers and was pretty good against t1 as well. He's actually 40% as effective at this tank role now: having the increased cost, massively reduced HP, and halved dmg reduction (75 -> 50%), still interesting to try I guess but a big part of me feels (without serious evidence) he's a worse card now but He's geared differently into a more specialized role.

[@Eirias_h4]

@@weak1ings Yeah, I definitely feel that. I hate it when cards that I like in their niche role get "buffed" into a different role and no longer fill my pet use-case.

[@robertboss2581]

Bandit minefield needs a nerf imo. You get to much value at t2 for just 70 power. Should be more like 85 honestly.