The basic principles of design and operation is explained demonstrating the pressure hull, conning tower, control, bridge and engine compartments and crew responsibilities.
Пікірлер: 395
@192Mars3 жыл бұрын
I love the "old school" documentarys. They are so much more informative and light on overdramitised video sequences and junk facts. It's really too bad these days the priority of documentarys is more "being nice to watch" than actual information. Thanks for uploading this!
@mtlbstrd3 жыл бұрын
@MikaelS....I can’t speak for Markus, but I am, and I agree with his assessment. American videos are so over-sensationalized, we get over stimulated and need more and more and more...it’s nice to get back to some simplicity, and NO “narrative”.
@davidweston91153 жыл бұрын
they also use proper english grammar, and they wear proper clothes and shave their faces, comb their hair, and refrain from vulgarity. Plus they don't show footage of the cameraman or backstage, and they don't follow the narrators and film the backs of their heads, which is very common now.
@Rockstar-lx2li2 жыл бұрын
Plus whoever is presenting seem to have the same voice .. I've watched so many of them..
@nerd20fromdiscord2 жыл бұрын
well said
@methei3 жыл бұрын
I love how this actually explains stuff in a way that is satisfying enough in itself. No artificial effects, drama, or misplaced attempts to create tension.
@MattNeufy2 жыл бұрын
I love these old timey explanation videos! Thorough as they are simple. You can come in with any knowledge of submarines and learn something new. We need to bring this style video to the modern age, not like those certain docs that are a little too over the top
@pouncepounce74172 жыл бұрын
@@MattNeufy A little too over the top? You always know that the people making them see there next assignment broadway dramatical theater!
@pocale4 жыл бұрын
Gotta respect the engineering of the era. Everything had to plan and manufacture from scratch, without computers/CAD/CAM. So many things to consider and plan to make it a ship and a war machine.
@eaglegrip68794 жыл бұрын
Right. The outhouse had to be located INSIDE the boat for quicker access and response time. lol
@johndo39303 жыл бұрын
@@eaglegrip6879 lol even the outhouse was a complicated conction of pipes the germans once sunk one of their own subs because some sailor turned the wrong valve to flush. talk a bout an backwashlol.
@kubamiszczz3 жыл бұрын
nothing changes, now we have more sophisticated tools, but we also make more sophisticated things, and they based on prevoius tech as we rely on theirs, its civilization development
@user-bk4fb8zg1v2 жыл бұрын
โน
@barracuda70182 жыл бұрын
All slide rule and crude mathematics. Also the SR71 was built the same way. Groundbreaking engineering achievements. Today the software does all the job..
@gag14113 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video. As old as this is it still holds immense educational value. Thanks for sharing 👍
@blurryface52877 жыл бұрын
I love the narrations of these old informative documentaries.
@72Disco19987 жыл бұрын
Xavier Castiel I agree
@sukeshkar39666 жыл бұрын
72D
@npsfam6 жыл бұрын
I also love this "old" stuff. It is actually quite informative as well ....
@davidchinery74766 жыл бұрын
Blurry Face ",l
@johnvictorengland77035 жыл бұрын
It's almost as if the government hired one guy whose job it was to narrate every single infomercial made between 1930-1970.
@dustycrophopper27438 ай бұрын
Simply amazing technology at that time. How they made it without cad or can or cae is just pure genius!
@devgru81973 жыл бұрын
This is a great video! Shows the complexity of a submarine. Even though our modern nuclear powered submarines are much more complex in many ways, the fundamentals are still exactly the same!
@dickylobster5 жыл бұрын
Served as a machinist mate on the USS Carp SS 338, 1966. This is the same layout as the Carp
@ChazizMTA5 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@lancelot19535 жыл бұрын
Regards to you, I served on SSBN-642 twenty years later, Peace be with you, Ciao, L
@TexasBarnRats3 жыл бұрын
Awesome! (for a bubble-head)
@aleckravt38482 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir!
@JK-jl5ci Жыл бұрын
I have plan to build submarine DIY, this information really useful to build with some awesome features. Much appreciate it.
@MrGeoffHilton2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, I could watch these all day, nostalgic as well reminds me of my years in the air force when we would often have these documentaries when learning about equipment. Thanks for the upload and keep them coming.
@dangcao83414 жыл бұрын
I think this is a learning for the navy in back in the day..
7 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! Need to start a TV network for these types of videos.
@glenkelley60483 жыл бұрын
Thank You so much for a fine presentation explaining many things, you have cleared up a lot of confusion I had.
@edmondchege73815 жыл бұрын
Best educational channel on KZbin
@div_shrimali4 жыл бұрын
these videos are gems!!!
@kennyj43664 жыл бұрын
What a complex piece of machinery. The real mind blowing part is they did it all with slide rules.
@williamgibb55573 жыл бұрын
A good slide rule and operator will give you incredibly accurate numbers. Something like 0.0001 . Or 1 in 10 thousands. Or even better if needed.
@lastofus4563 жыл бұрын
The mind Blowing point is They Went to War in these Tin can's
@jcb57824 жыл бұрын
One can only marvel at WW2 technology(same goes for the 50s in case of this video). In fact, any technology from 1910 to 1960. It’s manmade, it’s tangible, out in the open. There are dozens if hinges and levers that all make stuff go. Just looking at something could tell you how it worked. And it’s all made by human hands. I once spoke to a gentlemen who renovated a bunker from the 50s. The ventilation system had a fan that was so balanced the thing was still turning when he found it. It had been in perfect sync for over 50 years! Now it’s all covered by a wall or hood. Out of sight, out of mind. No wonder there’s a shortage of technical staff. We aren’t exposed to technology like we used to be. Our kids are never exposed to engineering, so I don’t blame them for not choosing it.
@Arexodius3 жыл бұрын
Gotta appreciate actual craftsmanship!
@Internetspaceships7 жыл бұрын
Remarkable amount of engineering gone into these boats. I highly recommend playing a WW2 sub sim like Silent Hunter 4. Nothing quite like the feel of swimming around the pacific sending cargo and warships to the bottom.
@72Disco19987 жыл бұрын
Internetspaceships great game
@youhavenoprivacyandownnoth82895 жыл бұрын
arcadey compared to dangerous waters. play that if you want to operate a real sub.
@GhostworxYT4 жыл бұрын
@@youhavenoprivacyandownnoth8289 aah, but its not a WW2 subgame. I could think of a far more arcadey subsim than SH4 (it's crash dive but its also pretty fun). Also of ur looking for a new take on subsim, i suggest you try UBOAT, its available on steam.
@mikeelder92633 жыл бұрын
I got silent service for Nintendo.
@Arexodius3 жыл бұрын
Those are some amazing games! Too bad they suffer from some glitches with manual aiming (if you're into maximum realism)
@jasonwalding94023 жыл бұрын
Loved the sonar demonstration.
@jodyburke2033 жыл бұрын
So do I I love the narration of the program
@davidvogel89872 жыл бұрын
Great video, never realized the subs systems were that complicated, even more crazy than submariner had to have a working knowledge of all the systems
@scottfarnham27172 жыл бұрын
Great video!! Very informative and straight to the point. Admiral Lockwood certainly knows his way around a submarine!😉
@splunx32533 жыл бұрын
such a complex system,,,respect to the engineers of that era indeed...
@forestisalifestyle Жыл бұрын
Amazing. Just amazing. Thanks for the video
@ramitchatterjee14586 жыл бұрын
Splendid.....❤❤
@hachanabe3 жыл бұрын
old school documentarys are magically capable to keep you watching quiet and concentrated on the main heart of the subject. I miss this way of teaching. Nowadays if more about the Wao affect and distraction. pity
@neilfurby5553 жыл бұрын
Extraordinary amount of engineering! Where do the people fit in, its very cosy. Animation is impressive.
@leoroys96837 жыл бұрын
I use to work on them rather help build them as a welder at General Dynamics shipyard in Gotten Ct for 20 years or so
@Prowler9017 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Leo. I served on the Dallas for three years. You folks at GD build fine ships.
@gianferretti57816 жыл бұрын
what did they mean when they showed an image of a submarine or some type of platform literally carrying a cruiser ship? was it literally that or didb i miss something? and if yes how and why would they do that? i would really apreciate it if you answered, it made me very confused..
@gianferretti57816 жыл бұрын
leo roys what did they mean when they showed an image of a submarine or some type of platform literally carrying a cruiser ship? was it literally that or didb i miss something? and if yes how and why would they do that? i would really apreciate it if you answered, it made me very confused..
@jfdesignsinc.innovationsid15835 жыл бұрын
loose lips sink ships
@darrenmclellan67123 жыл бұрын
My late brother was a Navy welder at New London.
@kaliguladx40852 жыл бұрын
Just Amazing these machines have been around for more of 100 years
@agnostic473 жыл бұрын
When my dad left the RAF after his national service (he was discharged on the day the King died, 6th Feb 1952) he had an RAF handbook. It had many "cutaway view" drawings . I read that book until it fell to pieces.
@keithbrown2458 Жыл бұрын
Frankly this is almost like licking out secret information it’s amazing that you got this video thank you so much for sharing it is amazing
@Moronvideos19406 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the good video
@augustotan19196 жыл бұрын
Moronvideos1940 Songs by Nat Cole
@augustotan19196 жыл бұрын
P
@slimchance73353 жыл бұрын
How they keep the fuel tanks at equal pressure to the outside pressure is genius. Simply amazing.
@mohamedmahmud55862 жыл бұрын
It's really useful that old school was much better on those days I still remember the teacher uses sush films to help him making it easier for us on the 70's
@noe616 Жыл бұрын
I learned more from this video than I would of learned in a semester class on submarine nautics.
@ajpt43362 жыл бұрын
In general, the principle of horizontal movement of submarines is based on the principle of buoyancy developed by Archimedes. When the ballast tanks are filled with water, the overall density of the submarine hull increases so that the submarine descends to the seafloor.
@shanegrewell49913 жыл бұрын
Man the engineering alone is impressive, let alone the use of chemistry to integrate the diesel engines into the systems of the ship like the hydraulic. Not to mention how navigation must be done while completely submerged.
@dustycrophopper27438 ай бұрын
I am trying to design a submersible ship, an ark so to speak which is airtight and can take the pressure of huge waves. Looks like this video maybe useful.
@dominictachie59553 жыл бұрын
The fluency of this narrator makes the documentary even more interesting.
@keithbrown2458 Жыл бұрын
Let me be honest with you this is like watching UFO videos 100 years from now once again thank you sir amazing video
@spreadeagled56545 жыл бұрын
That’s a postwar GUPPY mod on a WWII era US Navy Balao class submarine.
@davidgreen50993 жыл бұрын
@@ronratcliffe2219 love that film
@spreadeagled56543 жыл бұрын
Ron Ratcliffe, That’s correct.
@drummer783 жыл бұрын
Those Guppy conversations were influenced by the Type XXI U Boat. With the ability to stay under water longer via the snorkel, there was no real need for the deck and bridge armaments. Also, the sail structure that housed the shears reduced the drag that was present on the earlier conning tower/bridge configuration.
@tobiaszistler3 жыл бұрын
@@drummer78 that shows how revolutionary the type XXI realy was i spot quite a few features that the guppy conversions got from the type XXI
@endryw73686 жыл бұрын
detail informastion for people
@jjohnson41533 жыл бұрын
Interesting and yet great to fall asleep to.
@zoesdada89235 жыл бұрын
I have wanted to build my own sub since i was a kid. Now that ive seen "Euronaut" and the other personal subs built i know it can be done. Now the only issue is money and lots of it.
@scottcampbell75353 жыл бұрын
We used that Maneuvering Room, as a cigar bar.
@ravimalayilravimalayil84643 жыл бұрын
Very interesting subject thanks for provider
@rajasingammuthusamy9593 жыл бұрын
Suggestion; just curious about refloating technology during an ERP sinking situation. How abt designing a refloating technology installed within for activation during an emergency sinking situation.
@MisteriosGloriosos9222 жыл бұрын
thanks for posting this video!!!
@Cody-zd2ye3 жыл бұрын
So interesting thank you so much
@mathewgodfrey53522 жыл бұрын
awesome work man we want more videos about submarines , they are so cool . ps: love the old video like documentary
@Haza31377 жыл бұрын
cool stuff
@user-kq7ov9gc8w2 жыл бұрын
احسنتم انتم عصر التكلونجيا واحنا عصرالاكل
@cosmicatrophy46487 жыл бұрын
What year is this film from?
@mcdus14417 жыл бұрын
yea..... I Believe post ww2
@stefanrichter91626 жыл бұрын
I dont think so. The numbers are quiet bad for a post WW2 Submarine. Comparison : the Sub in the movie , autonomy submerged full speed 10 miles , slow speed 100 miles. Now the numbers of Typ XXI (german , last model to see action) , autonomy submerged 8 knots : 120 miles. 3 knots : 487 miles , full speed submerged 16.5 knots. Looking at the performance , in the movie they describe a Gato-class US-Sub. Another difference , the german XXI had a semiautomatic reload system fot the torpedoes. Could reload the 6 front torpedoes in less than 30 minutes. In manual loading you need this 30 minutes only for the first torpedo.
@johnvictorengland77035 жыл бұрын
This looks like a Narwahl class submarine and they were commissioned in the late 20s and early 30s and decommissioned after WW2. I was able to track down this exact submarine and she was laid down on the 2nd of August 1927. She served in the battle of Midway and attacked Japanese cruisers in said battle. In total she served in 14 patrols before she was decommissioned. What a beauty.
@TexasBarnRats3 жыл бұрын
The Admiral mentioned the Nautilus, so it has to be 1955 or later.
@lesthomasson72203 жыл бұрын
1492
@carlsaganlives60863 жыл бұрын
Gee whiz, what a swell movie with some neat-o pictures!
@mellasio39114 жыл бұрын
i wander if you can use the compres air to suply the air for brerathing inside
@briananthony40444 жыл бұрын
Yes, it mentions that in the video,
@wasifzahed Жыл бұрын
which year this documentary released? very informative
@jb90905 жыл бұрын
June 1939: British submarine HMS Thetis floods and sinks while conducting diving trials in Liverpool Bay with 103 men on board. The crew keeps the stern afloat for several hours, but only four sailors manage to escape and avoid suffocation or drowning.
@keithbrown2458 Жыл бұрын
By the way thank you for sharing this pretty amazing footage
@thaigiapham87375 жыл бұрын
Good video,thanks
@dayarao15556 жыл бұрын
good infor evn old documentaries
@cybercat15317 жыл бұрын
As opposed to the Airforce submarine? :P Oh who am i kidding. Quality Video
@Snipeyou17 жыл бұрын
nice 10/10
@leoroys96837 жыл бұрын
CatSay + I was in the USAF for 4 years
@viking907064 жыл бұрын
Well if the Navy can have Aircraft, I suppose the the Air-force can have Submarines....................
@wetbobspongepants6 жыл бұрын
OMG!...I actually understood most of this. ♪ TAH DAH ♫
@KevinSmith-gb3cx4 жыл бұрын
WetBob SpongePants
@TheStudiors3 жыл бұрын
Every Silent Hunter' players do. 😁
@WV5915 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@davidschmidt60135 жыл бұрын
Should have given credit to the original producers, and quote the date
@homerilias5 жыл бұрын
The 3000LBS Air system.. is that per sqaure inch, per cm, per foot, per carrot diameter?
@kyleyoung21445 жыл бұрын
Felix El Gato that’s per square inch. pretty common hpac pressure for ships
@Tiagomottadmello4 жыл бұрын
Nice vídeo !!👍👍
@justinbullock6813 жыл бұрын
Is the circle shape stronger than a triangular shape?
@montanus7773 жыл бұрын
yes, because the pressure is evenly distributed. in a triangle the pressure in the middle of each of the three sides would be significantly higher than in the corners.
@JusticeAlways2 ай бұрын
After watching this...I am ready to build my first submarine.
@KKhhoorrnniittee Жыл бұрын
The officer is absolutely at home with answering all sorts of dumb questions in a clear and concise manner (((((-!
@ashwoodfilms12282 жыл бұрын
clear and precise
@user-sl9qk1ms2n3 жыл бұрын
Сложная машина, но объяснение хорошее, понятное.
@julioalejandroaldoferrarij65083 жыл бұрын
excelente
@Ozzie4wheels3 жыл бұрын
That's amazing at how complex a submarine can be. Think about how many miles of pipe there must be in one of those subs.
@boatguy643 жыл бұрын
Just think.. This was a 'simple' diesel sub. Imagine a modern nuclear sub with nuclear weapons.
@rusher803 жыл бұрын
nice on week end i will try constructing a sub
@GFD_VIDEOS5 ай бұрын
Submarines are designed to be slightly negatively buoyant when submerged. This means that they are slightly heavier than the water they displace. Ballast tanks, located in the hull, can be flooded with water or pumped out to control the submarine's overall buoyancy
@HarryBalzak3 жыл бұрын
All these amazing safety and redundant features still didn't save the Thresher, and I am sure safety features only increased in the time between this and nuclear subs.
@nanibabuchepoori35063 жыл бұрын
Anybody telme bubmitane working equation. Attractions or reflect based
@acersalman82588 ай бұрын
great machine very good ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@eaglegrip68794 жыл бұрын
All subs need a screen door installed to keep out them pesky fish. :0)
@rockabyebaby61113 жыл бұрын
You have just answered my question.. I thought maybe there is a pipe that sends them straight to the frying pan LOL!!
@dceecowboy3873 жыл бұрын
Do you know why they called the diesel subs 'pig boats'? Because the boats distillery could only make so much fresh drinking water, that was used mostly for the cooks - thus leaving little for showers, which tended to make the crew (at times) live like a pig. The crew would usually enjoy the at sea swim call for an opportunity to clean up.
@williamhill73123 жыл бұрын
Great video
@ankurkapil69173 жыл бұрын
I respect submariners very much
@Arexodius3 жыл бұрын
Nerves of steel, probably.
@4kdemoscene6 жыл бұрын
Just who is this mysterious narrator? (The voice sounds the same in most old military documentaries... lol)
@btpcmsag6 жыл бұрын
Maybe never made a name for himself -- I've never seen a name for "narrator" in these old WWII documentaries. Perhaps he was like Tommy Tedesco, legendary guitarist, who never made contracts so he could collect residuals, now his sons are paupers.
@4kdemoscene6 жыл бұрын
Kind of a shame... Thanks for your input.
@fitofight85405 жыл бұрын
Its Donald Trump
@nonnobissolum5 жыл бұрын
@@btpcmsag ….well, if his sons are paupers, that's on them, not on him. Sure, if he had handed them bags of money then they might not be poor, but...those same sons also have the freedom to earn their own way in the world. You want money? Go out and get it for yourself, not wait for handouts from family or anyone else. Sheesh. Today's generation...
@geoben18104 жыл бұрын
@@nonnobissolum Of course you leave money for your kids. But while they're young you teach them about how to earn money. Duh 😲
@razony3 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing these in highschool in the 70's thinking they were old then.
@spidrespidre3 жыл бұрын
Does anybody know who the Admiral and the other guy are? I think it might be Rickover but I'm not sure
@leandrojr.picson586 жыл бұрын
Is the diesel engine being used below sea?
@TheSchmed6 жыл бұрын
Ƀɹyan Peazone nope, used to recharge batteries and for propulsion when not submerged.
@H0kram6 жыл бұрын
It definitely can! The schnorchel allows it to be used at telescopic depth. Air-independent propulsion allows modern diesel electric subs, to use their engine at any depth, using different technics, from liquid oxygen to fuel cells. It can stay submerged for weeks while running on diesel, and produces very little noise compared to the nuclear engines and their cooling system.
@btpcmsag6 жыл бұрын
Bryan Peazone -- To use diesel engines they have to A) be able to expel the exhaust gasses, and B) consume fresh air that would also be for the crew to BREATHE. So with this level of technology 3,000 psi is the highest pressure on board the sub. Therefore, presuming they can pump the diesel exhaust gasses out of the sub at 3,000 psi, it would be impossible to run the diesel engines any deeper than 1,250 ft. depth, nor would it be possible to blow ballast tanks deeper than that since the ambient seawater pressure would be greater than 3,000 psi. So the submarine would be virtually STUCK down there forever. IOW foundered. In practice, however, there is probably a factor of safety they use so they would never try to operate the sub deeper than say 1,100 ft. And they probably can't run the engines that deep either since the pumps they use to compress fresh air at the surface would not be pumps they would want to get contaminated with diesel exhaust gasses. Of course, when it's a matter of survival, it would be better to LIVE and have to breathe diesel fumes for a few days than to DIE because you can't move and you're being depth-charge bombed for hours on end. With the advent of "liquid oxygen" the pressure limits are all different because you need over 20,000 psi to contain liquid oxygen.
@wolf310ii5 жыл бұрын
@@btpcmsag 3000psi are 206bar, 1250ft are 381m, in 381m depth the ambient seawater pressure is only 38bar (551psi)
@kyleyoung21445 жыл бұрын
World Citizen nuclear engines, lol
@hansstopfer8783 жыл бұрын
The function of the torpedo launcher would also be very interesting. Bye Hans.
@thepurpleantidote87092 жыл бұрын
I'd like to hear what the difference is between a WW2 sonar ping, and a modern sonar ping, if there is one, the problem is, it's hard to find videos or info about that because you can't tell if it's just the stereotypical sonar ping, or if the stereotypical sonar ping was the actual sonar ping during WW2.
@Placebo65 жыл бұрын
Great, now i can build one. lol
@thebeatlesfan69546 жыл бұрын
would you rather live in space (spacecraft) or live underwater (submarine) ??
@btpcmsag6 жыл бұрын
The very idea of being confined in a submarine would no doubt drive me bonkers, but so would a spacecraft. I like to read about OTHER men doing this stuff but it's just too fantastic to imagine actually doing it myself. It's kind of the same thing, really, but opposite ends of the spectrum: in a sub you get crushed to death but in a spacecraft your blood boils in a vacuum and you die of blood clots in the brain, heart and lungs. Ever wonder what a dead body looks like after dying those ways? Creepy.
@akeeperofoddknowledge49565 жыл бұрын
The BeatlesFan69 ; submarine. You can always come to the surface, plenty of water and seafood. Both are in short supply in space. So is air.
@EnterpriseXI5 жыл бұрын
What class of Submarine is this video referring to
@lancelot19535 жыл бұрын
The principles apply to the most diesel/electric submarines of the era 1940~1950+. The schematics apply to the Gato- and Balao-class boats but the model at the end looks like a Tench-class submarine. Ciao, L (SSN-642)
@kevy1143 жыл бұрын
always wondered, when sub uses compressed air to empty ballast tanks to surface, that air is lost to the atmosphere, if the sub was to dive again again in a hurry how is the compressed air replaced for the next surface, had me perplexed for years.
@DerH0ns3 жыл бұрын
@NINJAMAN420 But it'll draw in the air meant for the crew and also lower the pressure inside the hull, it's more likely that the air tanks contain more air than is needed to surface once.
@spreadeagled56543 жыл бұрын
In today’s modern submarines, the “conning tower” is no longer located atop the main hull. The “conn” is now in the control room and the empty upright “tower” structure is now called the “sail” or what the Europeans call, the “fin.”
@matthewnewton88123 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I didn’t know that. Is that because with digital technology the periscope doesn’t need to be located directly above its viewfinder?
@spreadeagled56543 жыл бұрын
Matthew Newton, That is possible. Another reason may be better communication between the conn and the control room.
@matthewnewton88123 жыл бұрын
Flak Jack Ed Well, true, but I mean if you couldn’t bring the periscope back there with you that wouldn’t work at all. My guess- through either very primitive digital technology (developed DURING the war by Alan Turing) or a highly complex set of mirrors and that could simply detract the light to wherever it needed to be. One a mechanical advance, the other a true breakthrough in science. The post war is absolutely fascinating and stocked with these innovations everywhere you look. Contemplate that, will you, just for a moment?- that it was incumbent for millions to starve, be tortured, humiliated and die, their lives stolen and emisserated, for such progress of the kind that makes like easier, more pleasurable, extends its length for those left behind. Etc. does that seem like a morally balanced trade? I don’t know. I really don’t know. In any event, pointless to dwell on it. It’s the way it happened. No arguing with that.
@heyimamaker4 жыл бұрын
Crazy to think that they went from a range of 100miles underwater to unlimited with nuclear power.
@servicarrider3 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing in the known universe as unlimited power, nuclear or otherwise.
@heyimamaker3 жыл бұрын
@@servicarrider I know :) It's like when something says "lifetime warranty" Its the lifetime of that product. Unlimited in this case would probably be longer than the life of the people on the boat.
@spidrespidre3 жыл бұрын
A more accurate figure would be 20 years life before a reactor requires refuelling. Nutritional requirements of crew being left as the last limiting factor re length of voyage, although their sanity might be pushed if they were asked to spend multiple years at sea with only each other to talk to. Some things that might interest you: - water purification second to none (being distilled) - other than emissions from construction, no emissions or pollution generating through their working lifetime - the US Navy has never lost a sub to reactor failure or has there been a serious reactor-related incident while in operation, an exceptional safety record
@heyimamaker3 жыл бұрын
@@spidrespidre and yet people don't want a reactor as a clean source of power.
@HasrulMuhammad2 жыл бұрын
4]gpjllek4
@cindylawrence15153 жыл бұрын
These were Brave men sailing into war's many dangers with the greatly limited technology they worked under and the lack of the now huge safeguards every modern submariner enjoys. Would the war be won without their (and the airmen's) special brands of skills and courage? DOUBTFUL!