How Much Control Should We Give Robots? | The Future of Robotics | Part 1 | WIRED

[@davidwilkie9551]

All that's required is perfect programming, same as it has always been.

[@alpfrr]

Replicants are not robots, that's replicantism (2:47, Blade Runner Scene)

[@meejinhuang]

Only for the task the robot is designed to do and nothing more.

[@lunasquib]

Why not allow robots to develop but make sure Humans and Robots can share the control and if someone says a code robot or human The other robot shuts down fully

[@lunasquib]

I still fully believe we should perfect the driving AI and for now use it as an last resort because humans often make mistakes if they dont pay attention A robot makes mistakes if its not programmed innit or too unpredictable So we can fix wach others flaws in dribingy

[@duderama6750]

Dribingy? What auto complete bot wrote that for you? Do you want that thing "dribingy" your car?

[@jayb2128]

I get what you meant. AI is the future. It's the human error that causes road accidents etc.

[@lunasquib]

Vector is so cool

[@Qunyc1985]

Ahh this is why you have to take out these people.

[@pan2aja]

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind

[@karenishness1]

Depending on the programmer. Garbage in garbage out. Have you met any programmers?

[@lunasquib]

I dont get why the robots would start killing people? In my opinion that wouldnt make sense unless someone deliberately manipulated a robot or made them to be a killing machine If AI gets emotions most wouldnt want to use it for evil in my opinion

[@matthewviramontes3131]

Well let's say you told an Ai to solve global pollution and it realized the primary cause of pollution was humans, so it has us all killed. No more pollution. Basically, it's just doing what you told it to do but by it's own methods.

[@Qunyc1985]

@@matthewviramontes3131 The USA used autonomous weapons in World War 2. THe harpy drone from Isreal? HELLO!!!! WAKE UP.