Hey Bro, u r no fraud, we all realized that it’s not a 14 Ft table. Just thank you for showing all of the betting options to this game that we all love to play. Please keep up the great content. John H, Naples, Fl.
@ColorUp Жыл бұрын
Thanks John! I lived in naples for 19 years
@markadkins92902 жыл бұрын
Glad you added the 2nd player. I would love to have that much action and only be down $20. I don't think I could keep track with the other even if I wrote it down. Thanks Jeremy! Like I always said at the casino, they can have the money just as long as I'm having a good time while I'm there.
@lucifersatan8072 жыл бұрын
I agree on both statements - In Vegas, i'm essentially having fun with cheap drinks all night. And adding a second player as a baseline, helps me to understand how the strategy compares to "blind chance"
@Chekmate992 жыл бұрын
like others have posted, dice have no memory thus each role is independent of itself - unfortunately Craps is a negative EV for the player period - my thoughts is the best you can do is slow down your loses over time (many sessions) by playing the Pass Line with Odds. Or bet big and hope to win big on one or few rolls then quit and save yourself time (which should also be factored in terms of money) - otherwise it’s a death by a thousand cuts. the alternative is enjoying your time at the Craps table with the expectation of losing money - this strategy may be ideal for this as you could spend hours at the table minimizing your losses while other players are incurring losses faster (in terms of time at the table) by pressing bets, etc. which depletes their overall bankroll quicker (maybe not in one session but over many).
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Yep, I guess depends on your goal (why your playing)
@Chekmate992 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp exactly it should be to have fun and enjoy the game with the expectation of losing (paying for the entertainment) - any wins is a bonus and using the strategies you teach is good way to mix things up at the table
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
I agree, but there are many who believe they can beat the casino…😳
@larrycaseboltjr94982 жыл бұрын
The risk on numbers have already been established by the odds. Changing shooters is part of the randomness, but doesn't change the overall frequency of the number odds. Unless, of course, one believes that setting and controlling the dice roll provides a slight edge.
@MrZola1234 Жыл бұрын
This is a baccarat strategy. I believe it's called the 'No Mirror.' It may be more satisfying and fading less vig to play it off past passline decisions. Also, have seen fibinachi numbers rather than martingale betting used.
@geogent66552 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much. I just came across your channel and watched your 'how to play craps' with your son from 4 years ago. So through explained everything so clearly. Now with your advice I'm more confident about playing, as I was always afraid to do so 👍👍👍💯%
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Yes! It’s a great game. Give it a try and have fun
@chenryrex2 жыл бұрын
I did this and made a little. I changed it slightly, though, and bet $18 on the six, instead of $15 (table min.) on the pass. Because I didn't have to leave the six "on", I didn't lose on seven outs, after I got my money off the one field roll. I didn't make a TON, but hey, a win is a win! :)
@blackmagick772 жыл бұрын
I understand its unlikely to roll the same number but there are more possibilities in the field than the number being bet against
@psykosis16842 жыл бұрын
i dislike this strat. i dont mind the field betting but to keep track of 6 rolled numbers and then play the field to the opposite of the previous rolls just doesn't make sense.. the probabilities of the dice just doesn't work that way of betting (in my opinion). field betting to me is a sucker bet. i play it once and awhile and sometimes when 3 non field numbers hit, i feel better to play the field one time or 2... thanks for all your vids, i watch most of them when i have time. i am going to vegas on Nov 7th so some of your video strats will be used. keep up the great work and thank you for your time of making these vids! you are awesome!
@nickboretz17742 жыл бұрын
Have to agree with most comments not liking this. How about just a $50 DP bet..throw for 10 and 4s (2V set)..If you hit the 4, 5, 9, or 10..just place the number for $50. You can't lose and you can win $20 on the 5 or 9..and $40 on 4 and 10? Even the 6 and 8 will get you profit. One roll is all you need. You can hedge the 11 for a small amt. and still make money. I've done with $150 DP. It works most of the time. Just a thought. Good video. Lotta work.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Sure, everyone has their preferred way to play
@jacobsanchez9039 Жыл бұрын
The table lets you bring a pen and paper to track odds? I am very new to craps and your videos are really helping me to gain the confidence to get to a table. I just need the time now! lol
@ColorUp Жыл бұрын
Sure can. No electronic devices though.
@irfanhusein14452 жыл бұрын
I don’t think the guy who submitted this has an understanding of probability. Why not make it exciting by the following method. Assume a $15 minimum bet table. Place $25 on 5 & 9 and $48 on 6 & 8. And a $15 bet on the field. So basically a modified iron cross. So your biggest bets are on 6&8 where the probability is highest and your chance of winning on each roll is 83%. Start with a bank roll $800. Exit the game if and when you are up $400
@KorakBrosepf2 жыл бұрын
As a dark side player, please by all means.... I'll be over here counting my stacks of cash with all those sevens that are gonna come. ;)
@MrLeviaFUN2 жыл бұрын
I think the guy who submitted this strategy doesn't have an understanding of anything craps related
@ChristopherBowen-zg9co11 ай бұрын
I started playing Craps blind this Strategy Backed up my 5,6,8, next 2 are field well I play the 4,6,8,10 Buy bets then play the hard #'s $50.00 on the Hard #'s then 5,6,8, pops up I also $25.00 Horn & a $120.00 field hits then $10.00 Horn & $40.00 field if lose Martin Gayle it till it hits..I started with a $150.00 Bankroll now my last Bankroll $750.00 this next trip I put that in a savings account I'm adding to it next Month I'll have$1,250.00 I enjoy your proram..I also play the Bonus Craps too like to see a strategy that works it in too I call Building Your Bankroll doing a great job hopefully soon I get to join
@titusvandussen63032 жыл бұрын
If the only trigger for making a field bet, is that a non-field number rolled, then you really shouldn't have to track anything or wait around for anything except for that trigger. Just wait for any non-field number and then bet.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Well his point is, the unlikely probability of repeating a sequence of numbers, not just one number
@lucifersatan8072 жыл бұрын
Winning the lottery is unlikely, but people do it fairly regularly. Granted, not everyone wins, but unlikely probability does occur.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
@@lucifersatan807 of course it does, its still gambling
@clueless92452 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp Call me stupid, but he selects the 6 numbers not to repeat (usually first 6). But you can count any 6 numbers. 7 could still be a non field bet. Or do not come. But he keeps it to field vs no field. Lot of thinking involved to not get far. Placing 6&8 and turning off after x hits is far easier.
@dangdude1000 Жыл бұрын
The progression is delayed one roll to avoid the chop.. so 10-10-25 if the 12/2 rolls voila you got it..free drinks..🤗🤗
@metalmattchew Жыл бұрын
I played next to someone playing a system close to this on a cruise ship. It confused me.
@clueless92452 жыл бұрын
Might as well flip a coin as to whether you bet in the field or not.
@hulenbryant56372 жыл бұрын
Whew! Yeah, I don't have the patience for that system. May work for this guy (like others, I ain't hatin'), but definitely not for me. I'll stick with understanding the house edge, enjoying the game and hoping for some winning in the short term.
@muhammadcurtis67592 жыл бұрын
This strategy is a complete snooze festival, and the range of ending amounts of money after a session seems pretty small. I would definitely pass on this. With that being said, if it works for him I ain’t mad.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
I ain’t mad either but you’re right about slow. But slow and steady wins the race so they say
@krynny2 жыл бұрын
Yeah any strat that involves multiple field bets seems like a waste.
@paulyacovetta76422 жыл бұрын
If your in this game for entertainment . This strat ain’t it. I know your more of an entertainment better but when I hit the table I’m there to win money . When you win money you beat the odds/ math/ analytics !! It’s gambling . There’s reward for risk . When you beat all those . Your right you need the bank roll to do it !!!
@ebojfmdboojoh4023 Жыл бұрын
Why is he ignoring a 7 if he is just betting the field anyway. Maybe he should just track the last 6 numbers and note whether they are field numbers or not and bet the opposite. I don't see the reasoning for starting the sequence again if a 7 is rolled.
@stevep82172 жыл бұрын
i have never had success using a negative progression system, i actually did have success using a system let bet ride 3x and 1 martingale shield passline/come bet in vegas with a 100 unit bankroll and i did progress the bankroll per 50 units
@clueless92452 жыл бұрын
Guess this is supposed to show as a gambling efficinado given the language.
@mattytheapplianceguy39732 жыл бұрын
I guess after all the color up video I've seen the real takeaway is that it's dice favored towards the house. There is no guaranteed strategy for anything. But I still watch cause I don't live at the casino. Thanks for the great content. You should do a video on someone who bets 200 on the 6 versus someone who bets 10 on the six and 8. Both with a 200 bankroll
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
It’s hard to win, unless the dice roll your way. One $200 bet vs 10 bets of $20?
@mattytheapplianceguy39732 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp no I'm just realizing that dice are dice. So I'd like to see a guy that gambles vs a guy that wants to sit at the table for hours. It's almost like betting it all on black or red. What are the odds on the payout or going home
@mattytheapplianceguy39732 жыл бұрын
And pretend like the 10 better goes home when he hits 400 and the all in goes home broke or with 400
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
@@mattytheapplianceguy3973 I see. that’s really a big difference. Neither approach is wrong, it just comes down to personality of player I think. Some would rather bet it all on red in hopes to double money fast not caring if go broke, others would rather sit their as long as possible, gets some drinks, enjoy some entertainment.
@Twinsen7642 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Stick with bubble craps on this one. You don't know what's rolling next. Tracking previous numbers has nothing to do with the next number that is coming up.
@tchinn792 жыл бұрын
I was at PH this past week and played craps. I saw a table that showed 2 and 3 added to the top which really threw me off. Anybody seen this? Plus they also have Craps kiosks where there is a shooter but you not surrounded by people.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
I believe the first table you saw is “crapless craps” they remove the dont bets and add 2,3,11,12 as box numbers. The second thing is called “stadium craps” one real shooter, the rest of players bet on electronic terminals with the shooters dice roll determining the number.
@tchinn792 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp have you done a video on crapless craps? The stadium craps was actually fun. It’s much faster pace.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
@@tchinn79 here ya go kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXjLnqybYtCHiNU also if you search “crapless craps color up” on KZbin you’ll find a few strategy videos I did on crapless
@apburner18 ай бұрын
The dice don't have a memory. The odds of any particular combination being rolled are exactly the same every roll no matter what came before. It's hard to believe that this was proposed by a risk analyst.
@rudyjewelz46092 жыл бұрын
This is basically the exact same strategy as the “no mirror” strategy in baccarat. Except with field bets instead of banker/player. Not much analytical about it at all
@TheTylerjoy042 жыл бұрын
Does This Strategy Apply For Single Bubble Craps Machine?
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Sure
@dand.20822 жыл бұрын
I guess there’s no direct relationship between risk analysts and craps players. One of the most ridiculous strategies I ever heard.
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
Yeah it does sound rediculous but it’s profitable. I think it’s rediculous to play pass line with odds and all the place bets. It mathematically unprofitable. I mitigate risk on the daily and I use software to prove it
@dand.20822 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 ok you go boy!
@xAjido2 жыл бұрын
Couldn't imagine myself going away to AC for a weekend and doing this. I'd rather stay home and watch paint dry.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
ha, fair point
@jeffm67792 жыл бұрын
This is a great strategy for baccarat not craps.
@Charlie-Bee2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@rudyjewelz46092 жыл бұрын
Exactly,, this is just no mirror strategy applied to the field ..
@stevep82172 жыл бұрын
do you recommend wincraps?
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
I don’t have it because It’s not available for Mac, but most love it. Seems like a great tool
@Shooter11B2 жыл бұрын
That strategy could very well be the most boring one ever. Tiny profit for so much work and waiting around. LOL, they might just kick you off the table for it! Personally, I don't believe in strict probability, I believe that dice are more aligned with Chaos Theory.
@Listener8272 жыл бұрын
This strategy seems doomed to bore, and make no money---most times 7-O is by 6-7th roll. Doing nothing 1st 6 rolls leaves player with only the 'long roll' or 'longer rolls' where more strategies win. This strategy will never work on a cold table, or cool table. Do appreciate you trying multiple strategies and your general delivery and use of smaller bets--and you always wisely advise making sure to have 10X bet--not enough roll-to the casino you never go!👍
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
I couldn’t play this way personally
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
Robert when I go to the casino I’m not there to “gamble”. I’m there to make money. I use 25$ units and I’m out after I’m up 200$. It’s not sexy or flashy but it’s mathematically consistent and profitable. Put in in wincraps and run it for 100 rolls or less and it will show you without bias.
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp thanks for showing my system Jeremy
@Listener8272 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 Thanks for the response. Just as some people speak English, others Spanish, others Chinese, ...the Universe has a language--that's math. Tesla proved numbers 3, 6 and 9 form the basis of "everything" for the universe. As you use 6 rolls--you may have something quite valuable, perhaps some of the 'finer' rules of using this system and how and when to employ were not mentioned. Personally I love math and Stats and my life in medicine was based on math, stats, and science...semi-retired now. Share your desire at the Craps table--I'm Not there to gamble: I'm there to use stats and probability to win. My critique was that on cold or cool table you're rarely gonna hit 6 rolls, so 'nothing' is gonna happen. When you do get 6 rolls, it's gonna be over by roll 8 (68%) or 10 (78%). By roll 12 91% of all shooters are 'out'. Is this for the long and longer tolls in that 9%? What's your timeframe for making the $200? Right now I'm 'averaging' $500/hour using 2 different strategies...when played at base levels. There are 5 more levels which double at each level to make 2, 4, 8, 16, 32x base level. It's 'fun' because there's a moderate amount of 'action'. It works on cold table, cool table, choppy table, warm table and hot table. Takes 2 hours to earn CD to go from Base to Level I, then 1 hour each to go to the next 4 levels..so we're back at the number 6. Please share with me some of the finer points of when and how you use this system, and time to make that $200. Also why stop at $200? And...thanks for your reply.
@lorib5398 Жыл бұрын
I do this martingale, but with hardways
@borlum Жыл бұрын
“Mathematically unlikely, the sequence will repeat”. Obviously this “risk analysis” doesn’t understand math. The dice does not care what came before. This is only a valid statement if you call it before you roll the sequence. 😂
@mmsk17177 ай бұрын
😂 i’d be embarrassed to tell my friends that I play this strategy
@obiwonton3692 жыл бұрын
And for U marty bettors that have Not lost to 7 X 7 your time is coming. While the long odds are strong against repeater patterns dice are dumb aint got no memory
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Well his progression stops at 5, so a well defined loss limit. But yes, martingales always run up against table max or out of money eventually
@douglasgrosch2282 жыл бұрын
Count 20-25 times start no 12/ or 2 25$. It will come soon..
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Or it won’t. That’s the gamble.
@louvoodoo2 жыл бұрын
I hope the guy who submitted this comments on this so that I can ask him a few questions.
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
I’m here Louis
@louvoodoo2 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 Outstanding!!!! First I find your idea intriguing. But may I ask why a sample size of six rolls? Additionally, I feel as though using the 7 vs the 6&8 may be a more effective approach vs a field /nonfield condition. Would you be willing to share your math behind this approach? Lastly, have you done any work with the intervals between sevens?
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
@@louvoodoo yes you speaking my language!! I’ve tested it with many rolls but 6 is enough to get to profit
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
@@louvoodoo as far as the 7 I’ve studied and ran software to see the data on the 7 and it’s behaviors on a random roll. Nothing really came of it but there definitely is room for strategy around it
@edclearwater98918 ай бұрын
Not for me either
@liudizzle6 ай бұрын
Pretty surprising a risk analyst would use such a nonsensical strategy!
@formulaifiero22 жыл бұрын
Probably one of the worst strats I've seen. Completely ignores how often the 7 comes through probability which is crucial to any realistic strategy. I don't like Martingale either. The only decent progressive system would be a Fibonacci approach. I can't imagine anyone playing this horrible strategy out on any live table since it's a complete bore, way too much to track, and the chances of winning are nearly non-existent. Nice of you to roll it out anyways though.
@hardattackdj2 жыл бұрын
This strategy strips the fun out of the game. It’s a game, so it’s supposed to be fun. And for what? Maybe walking away with $20-$30 after a couple of hours? I’d rather just go to work.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
🤷♂️
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
Dan I play with 25$ units so I’m walking with over 200$ average. It’s math and I’m not there to have fun or gamble. I’m there to make money
@hardattackdj2 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 fair enough. How long does it take on average to hit $200?
@chiefofdc2 жыл бұрын
Would get a better idea if you played at a bubble craps.
@donaldisidori421 Жыл бұрын
Too much risk to lose the only gaining $10 at a time I'd rather play the field maybe be better luck system I wouldn't play not for me
@EastPeakSlim2 жыл бұрын
Overly complicated for an old dude with a short-attention... what was I talking about?
@MrLeviaFUN2 жыл бұрын
Dice have no memory. Martingale is a great way to lose big money. Garbage strategy
@Chekmate992 жыл бұрын
and that’s why table games have max. limits on the amount you can bet
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Martingale is perfect strategy…until you hit that table max limit or run out of money 😉
@toxsickdog2 жыл бұрын
I would never martingale the field with it's chinsy 1 to 1 payoff (2:1 on craps) I would rather martingale one of the Hard ways & stick with it. starting at $1 & progressing up as It loses. It is a real thrill when your hard # comes up & you have 30 bucks on it. & the hard ways are not one roll bets like the field (exception is the hop bet). So You can play longer before losing all of your hard earned cash!
@MrLeviaFUN2 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp , I agree J
@adx75742 жыл бұрын
This is without a doubt the worst strategy I’ve ever scene. Why play craps at that point? Just put your money in a very low percentage savings account. May end up making money faster that way.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Ha
@Fire54852 жыл бұрын
Love your content... This strategy is ridiculous. Long, tedious, intensive on effort by the player for minimal reward.
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
You’ve been indoctrinated to think that you have to have excitement at the table for it make sense. I’m 100% sure you are a “gambler” and not profitable. Any savvy investor does not do day trading they buy and hold blue chip stocks and in mutual funds. Again it’s not sexy but year over year it produces a 8-12% return. That’s how I view casino games.
@Fire54852 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 I'm a math major who is teaching grade school for a career. My retirement fund is in conservative mutual funds. On the other hand, my limited casino time is for fun. Smart fun, but fun. That's what I'm spending my money on. Any strategy I use has to have a balance of action with only intelligent risks. Of course it's gambling, that's what I step up to the table for. That's what makes it fun and exciting for me.
@mandelwhitehead42062 жыл бұрын
@@Fire5485 fantastic so we understand the same things. The only difference is I’m not looking to have fun. Everything to me has a ROI- people, work, games. So I’m only looking to have a 1-3% return on my time and money in a casino. Also thank you for teaching! I salute you for that
@Fire54852 жыл бұрын
@@mandelwhitehead4206 Fair enough, different goals at the table. The mathematician in me is fearful of the day you do eventually hit the wall on your martingale. I pray it never happens. All the best, sir.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Well he has a lose limit in place, only martingale for 5 levels. So worst case scenario really isn’t that bad.
@malcolmwasher9915 Жыл бұрын
This makes 0 sense lol
@malcolmwasher9915 Жыл бұрын
Whattttttttt
@buraktezcan23072 жыл бұрын
1st
@dustedone2 жыл бұрын
Digging deep into that bag of crap..I mean "tricks" to provide content. If you are so steadfast to negative proxies in the game of craps, why would you find it necessary to proof any martingale system? And to boot, why would you embark on the gambler's fallacy? I can't what till next time to see what you pull out of that empty bag of "tricks."
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
Tricks? I share people’s strategies. I don’t approve or disapprove how anyone chooses to gamble their money. Thanks for watching.
@dustedone2 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUpIf your such a craps eficinado. Why again, on top of the gambler's fallacy and a martingale strategy, would you promote a strategy on one of the worst wagers on the table. The combination of these three elements to ANY games of chance would be a losing strategy. The comparison of a losing strategy to a bigger losing strategy is fluff. Your just putting out content for what??? I am sure there is content worthy material you have covered over the many years of posting; there is only so much that can be presented on the game. And your grasping at straws to be consequential. So keep digging deep in that bag o'tricks. Or better yet, time to jump on the Crapsee train.
@ColorUp2 жыл бұрын
@@dustedone Again, I share peoples strategies. I don't judge. This is KZbin, I put out content for....entertainment. This is not stock trading advice. It's an amazing gambling game that I love, and also like to see how others play it. You must also be entertained as you continue to watch and keep commenting. Appreciate your interaction, it just helps my channel. Also you can look forward to me jumping on that train, and playing with others using that App, it looks like fun. Shouldn't you be in the casino right now? Or making your own original content?
@dustedone2 жыл бұрын
@@ColorUp The fluff of content I call crap is what you deem entertainment?? If you need to waste time on losing strategies, that is of course your choice. My rebuttal of your statement is where I base my opinions of your content on your channel. And if a SIM is the future of your craps endeavor the reality will be me playing my run n gun magic dlx making profits while you will looking for your next shill to impress and buy your schwag. I was,of course, at the casino yesterday day. But why mention that; you would just say my claims are false and remove my replies. And in pre-production for future postings that you will most likely pick apart and state that doesn't prove a thing. Naysayers gotta love em