How Small is an Atom?

  Рет қаралды 1,841,967

Jared Owen

Jared Owen

Күн бұрын

The size of an atom is only a few angstroms at most - there are 10 billion angstroms in 1 meter. This video also goes the basic parts of an atom (protons, neutrons, and electrons) and why the traditional model of the atom is not correct. Electrons are unpredictable - we can't know the path that they travel. Most importantly - they don't orbit the nucleus.
This video has been dubbed in over 20 languages, you can change the audio track language in the Settings menu (click the gear icon in the lower right hand corner of the video).
Try dubbing your videos with AI: dittodub.com/a...
For the curious minded:
-Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that the position and velocity cannot both be measured at the same time
-The orbital is only about a 95% probability of finding the electron - it could still be found outside.
-Electrons can even be described as a wave (in addition to a particle) occupying the whole orbital at once.
Made with Blender 2.78a
Music:
Call to Adventure - Comedy by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommon...)
Source: incompetech.com...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Sources:
www.nobeliefs.c...
www.universetod...
www.uwgb.edu/d...
#chemisty #physics #b3d

Пікірлер: 1 700
@jhes52105
@jhes52105 5 жыл бұрын
I am a chemist with a master degree in chemistry, and I have to say that this is not something that is easy to understand and explain, so I admire your intelligent and the effort :D
@imadakhunkhail3360
@imadakhunkhail3360 5 жыл бұрын
You say ture
@vigneshkumar1566
@vigneshkumar1566 5 жыл бұрын
I am chemist Indian hii
@sontubanerjee9949
@sontubanerjee9949 5 жыл бұрын
I am in high school but I got a clear idea about everything from Heisenberg's uncertanity principle,shapes of orbitals,filling of electrons to Schrodinger's atomic model.
@SubconscVoice
@SubconscVoice 5 жыл бұрын
sir would u like to make video over orbitals
@rashidnn1367
@rashidnn1367 5 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ailiasim
@ailiasim 2 жыл бұрын
Your animation and explanation of a few minutes is better than whole chapters of textbooks and tens of hours of learning and infinite hours of trying to understand this.
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 2 жыл бұрын
Glad to help😁
@princeclassen
@princeclassen Жыл бұрын
Where do you study man ?? Probably you don't have reading habit. Even if you will read it through the book, You will get it. 🤣
@RajKumar-ws3oq
@RajKumar-ws3oq Жыл бұрын
Yup, got some clarity of that concept after watching this
@neetaspirants594
@neetaspirants594 Жыл бұрын
Gud To see some shias on KZbin ♥️ I Am also Shia Muslim
@DipanjanAdhikary18
@DipanjanAdhikary18 4 жыл бұрын
Only legends know that they watched JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Bohr, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schroedinger's theories in just 5 minutes .
@nisargbhavsar25
@nisargbhavsar25 4 жыл бұрын
Correct!!
@akshatpatidar2797
@akshatpatidar2797 3 жыл бұрын
Molecular orbital theory as well
@krishnannarayanan8819
@krishnannarayanan8819 3 жыл бұрын
So am I a legend?
@vijaydharmadhikari2440
@vijaydharmadhikari2440 3 жыл бұрын
👍
@fahadnadeem8820
@fahadnadeem8820 3 жыл бұрын
You missed the boss Means Planks .....
@_baller
@_baller 4 жыл бұрын
Electrons are like camera flashes at a stadium
@masonjelvin6001
@masonjelvin6001 3 жыл бұрын
good fucking analogy
@marvaabyu197
@marvaabyu197 5 ай бұрын
Damn.. it was in fact, a good fucking analogy
@theswapniljagtap
@theswapniljagtap 5 жыл бұрын
Ohhh, so that's the reason I failed in chemistry.
@ekshayari_jk
@ekshayari_jk 5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@dnghn.design
@dnghn.design 5 жыл бұрын
Lmfaooo
@randomamericansoldier8586
@randomamericansoldier8586 4 жыл бұрын
Really
@provasinisinha927
@provasinisinha927 3 жыл бұрын
I score 95 marks in chemistry
@MidlandTexan
@MidlandTexan 3 жыл бұрын
aye, the moles ate holes in my understanding...
@ChacingBugs
@ChacingBugs 3 жыл бұрын
Possibly the simplest most concise explanation of the difference between orbit and orbitals that I've come across. Thanks!
@donnypangilinan2636
@donnypangilinan2636 5 жыл бұрын
there's so many scientists here... and I'm like an ancient human watching the video only for damn school projects Btw, it's a helpful video :)
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
Glad my video is helping Donny! Good luck on the project
@sanchits.4785
@sanchits.4785 4 жыл бұрын
Yup, apparently, i didn't knew that scientist revealing who they are are so common on yt. Damn, scientists saying, "I'm a scientist" on every science video.
@dragongamer9160
@dragongamer9160 2 жыл бұрын
R you really donny??!!
@farhanaf832
@farhanaf832 7 ай бұрын
We can help scientists by processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️
@arindamsarkar370
@arindamsarkar370 4 жыл бұрын
This video is so brilliantly put together! The animation went hand-in-hand with the narration and gave a good perspective on what's bigger and what's smaller; which comes first and whioch comes later? The size and order was aptly explained. Thank you!
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 4 жыл бұрын
😎
@AJOlesen
@AJOlesen 5 жыл бұрын
Jared: “what is the smallest thing you can think of?” Me: quarks
@The_zenithgod
@The_zenithgod 5 жыл бұрын
Fr that’s what I thought
@person8064
@person8064 5 жыл бұрын
Plank's length or string theory
@AJOlesen
@AJOlesen 5 жыл бұрын
Person GG man, I don’t think their something smaller than that
@ahmedabuswerih316
@ahmedabuswerih316 5 жыл бұрын
AJ Olesen Jared owen : hold my quarks
@niekparidaens8170
@niekparidaens8170 5 жыл бұрын
or the higgs particle
@rajk.9098
@rajk.9098 4 жыл бұрын
I whish my teacher could explain like this when I was in college!
@rajpawar9343
@rajpawar9343 4 жыл бұрын
It means it's time ro update our studies.
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB 4 жыл бұрын
are you a fool
@negasonicteenagewarhead
@negasonicteenagewarhead 4 жыл бұрын
Even 12th students know more than this video
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB 4 жыл бұрын
Are you a old person ?
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB 4 жыл бұрын
Very very old person
@RealClassyStudios
@RealClassyStudios 3 жыл бұрын
Why are all the KZbinrs that would make great teachers not teachers and we’re stuck with “refer to page [Number] in the Textbook” Love your content dude
@geekdiggy
@geekdiggy 4 жыл бұрын
school teacher: sit down and lemme learn you some science jared owen: i'm bout to wreck this man's whole career
@YoDay
@YoDay 5 жыл бұрын
I thought orbitals and orbits are same. KZbin > School Thanks!
@CrypticFate5
@CrypticFate5 3 жыл бұрын
@Jeet Pratap Singh you've written it otherway round.... orbitals are the area where the probability of finding an electron is max..
@shaurya_aggarwal_G
@shaurya_aggarwal_G 4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jared, I m a PCM student. This video was amazing since it allows us to easily visualize about this topic but I have small request here Can u pls pls pls make another video on this topic covering more topics deeply It will be really helpful for students...... Pls pls pls I m requesting this from u coz after watching ur video I came to know that u r the only person who can turn this topic into realistic animation Sir pls pls pls help It will be really helpful I promise that I will be sharing that to all my frns....
@Anonymous-kw7ls
@Anonymous-kw7ls 3 жыл бұрын
There are other KZbin channels too who cover such science topics very easily and explain them in animated form.
@mumkichux
@mumkichux 3 жыл бұрын
@@Anonymous-kw7ls please tell me some. I will be grateful ☺️
@Saf4ron469
@Saf4ron469 3 жыл бұрын
Really I need it too...I'm also a PCM student...🖖🖖🖖 videos like this really make things easier..
@mumkichux
@mumkichux 3 жыл бұрын
@@Saf4ron469 u can refer to TYLER DEWITT videos for chemistry . He's a great guy
@mumkichux
@mumkichux 3 жыл бұрын
@@Saf4ron469 I just came here coz of that atomic structure chapter. that's hard 😕
@bas9682
@bas9682 5 жыл бұрын
So an electron is just a dvd logo bouncing on your screen.
@hbt25
@hbt25 5 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment
@greenlemon3028
@greenlemon3028 5 жыл бұрын
So true lmao
@marck0060
@marck0060 5 жыл бұрын
No it's the default Windows XP screensaver
@quranize
@quranize 4 жыл бұрын
An electron is just a dvd logo touching the corner of your monitor. Its unpredictable. 😁
@jimmynobody8344
@jimmynobody8344 4 жыл бұрын
Mine Bomber not really. You think it’s gonna hit the corner, but it never does.
@EnerJetix
@EnerJetix 5 жыл бұрын
Just so I can remember when I watch this... 1 Angstrom=100 Femtometers Edit: Thanks past me
@ahmedaltaf12131
@ahmedaltaf12131 5 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@m.w.kaplan447
@m.w.kaplan447 4 жыл бұрын
aint got no one but yourself in this world
@EnerJetix
@EnerJetix 3 жыл бұрын
@@zoraizahmad6536 no.
@supernatural_forces
@supernatural_forces 3 жыл бұрын
Smaller than Nanometers there are Picometers. Then there are Femtometers ? And, quarks are measured in Femtometers, the Nucleus of an atom are known as quarks. Which is possibly the smallest particle the microscopes can see.
@nafishsarwar2077
@nafishsarwar2077 4 жыл бұрын
This is what Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is all about. Very nicely explained. Thanks.
@amanrthosarart2280
@amanrthosarart2280 4 жыл бұрын
allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html
@sajeeshbabucherappatta8413
@sajeeshbabucherappatta8413 11 ай бұрын
why heisannberg invent this principle🥺🥺 lead to made chemistry with unlimted studies materials from schools
@johnathanlee2367
@johnathanlee2367 6 жыл бұрын
short and simple explanations to clarify complicated idea, plus your amusing animation clear everything. Ive been searching sth like this
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 6 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it Johnathan!
@chrism3344
@chrism3344 5 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I've ever seen..so easy to understand..well done fellow!
@aquibkhan9385
@aquibkhan9385 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this helped me visualize chemistry. Thank you 😭😭
@rawmyaaj2325
@rawmyaaj2325 6 жыл бұрын
So reality is basically vibrating energy.
@tonezstonezkonez575
@tonezstonezkonez575 6 жыл бұрын
rawm yaaj ....yip, kinda like our "consciousness"
@rawmyaaj2325
@rawmyaaj2325 6 жыл бұрын
tonez I think when they say God created us in his image... I think they're talking about consciousness. Seem like consciousness is immaterial, but is the only real thing that truly exist.
@morningmadera
@morningmadera 6 жыл бұрын
lol
@acmefixer1
@acmefixer1 6 жыл бұрын
Mr. ConcealedCheese So, are you available to do magic shows for kids?? :-O
@fabian8813
@fabian8813 6 жыл бұрын
Cheers for the Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you tried - Taparton Growing Program Takeover (search on google)? It is a great one off guide for learning how to get a bigger manhood minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy after a lifetime of fighting got excellent success with it.
@johnnyroy9830
@johnnyroy9830 4 жыл бұрын
1:56 *As a Bharatiya (better known as Indians), it is quiet disappointing for me to see and hear from the world the fact that the Greeks researched everything. The innumerable ideas and inventions and discoveries, from atoms to radios to airplanes as well, originally germinated in this great country, but are now proudly published by others as their own work. When the world didn't even know to speak, Bharat was the only country to have had universities. The most scientific language known to the world, The Holy Sanskrit, originated here. The first successful surgery was carried out here. The very first well-developed civilization flourished in the Indus valley. There's a lot more for which you'll probably need a lifetime (or maybe two). And all these things took place around 5000BC !!!* *Hope you understated. Thank you*
@blueeye2281
@blueeye2281 4 жыл бұрын
I know bro how it feels. Actually those damn British are the reason we are so underrated.
@issaaczala5125
@issaaczala5125 4 жыл бұрын
Do "Bharat" existed before 1950 ? Any proof or reference ? All what you have cited is myth. Before 3000 years existing India was belong to Buddha, not hindu. Read facts please not myths.
@johnnyroy9830
@johnnyroy9830 4 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125 😂😂😂
@johnnyroy9830
@johnnyroy9830 4 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125I appreciate your knowledge sir...😂😁😂😂
@johnnyroy9830
@johnnyroy9830 4 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125 Surely from "Foxford University"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@tarangpatil6952
@tarangpatil6952 6 жыл бұрын
Why not just tell them about Heisenbergs Uncertainity Principle
@dankhank8569
@dankhank8569 5 жыл бұрын
Tarang Patil If we want to learn how to make meth we will look it up.
@giantsquid2
@giantsquid2 5 жыл бұрын
Because as he stated, he wanted to keep it simple
@narendramodicommunistversi4466
@narendramodicommunistversi4466 5 жыл бұрын
That is because, wouldnyou understand any bits of Schrödinger's wave equation on 9th standard? You need to know advanced mathematics like calculus, surds and logs for that.
@sontubanerjee9949
@sontubanerjee9949 5 жыл бұрын
Sure
@sontubanerjee9949
@sontubanerjee9949 5 жыл бұрын
@@narendramodicommunistversi4466 It was the reason for the failure of Bhor's atomic model.
@celebritystylewatch
@celebritystylewatch 4 жыл бұрын
Im a chemistry teacher i know its actually tough to teach but yiu did it Amazingly. Suplendid
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 4 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@khush4236
@khush4236 4 жыл бұрын
Group of atoms, seeing a group of atoms on a group of atoms that how small an atom is....!
@BlackElon1
@BlackElon1 3 жыл бұрын
Short ... sweet... simple.... and the BEST part is that it's understandable.... I LOVE IT!. thank you
@carlosnieto3189
@carlosnieto3189 6 жыл бұрын
Your Animation techniques accelerate the insight of one's mind... Good Job!
@shisir_nayak2377
@shisir_nayak2377 2 жыл бұрын
I am glad KZbin recommended me this 5 year old video.
@DAILYTECHNEED
@DAILYTECHNEED 6 жыл бұрын
make it more more complex please
@filthyfilter2798
@filthyfilter2798 6 жыл бұрын
:D y indeed :D it looked really interesting ^_^
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 6 жыл бұрын
What should I go more in depth on? I plan on making a follow up video in the future. I think orbitals is a topic I'd like to do more of
@DAILYTECHNEED
@DAILYTECHNEED 6 жыл бұрын
Jared Owen that would be great and thanks a lot for the reply.
@undertheradar4645
@undertheradar4645 6 жыл бұрын
Perhaps break down four quantum numbers.
@PavelSTL
@PavelSTL 6 жыл бұрын
@Jared "What should I go more in depth on? " I would try to explain what electrons are in the context of Quantum Field theory, since that's the "right" way of thinking about matter these days. So an electron is a perturbation in a "electron" field (like a photon is a perturbation in an EM field), but what does that mean?
@joelbert8438
@joelbert8438 18 күн бұрын
Electron orbitals fill up according to Pauli's exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons could have the same quantum state (principal, azimuthal, and magnetic quantum numbers, as well as quantum spin) and Hund's rule, which states that when electrons fill up orbitals, it must not be coupled with another electron in the same orbital until all the orbitals are filled up with at least one electron.
@Xrossbot
@Xrossbot 4 жыл бұрын
Finally after finding lots of video... Got this masterpiece
@DebasisBera-gv9nc
@DebasisBera-gv9nc Жыл бұрын
Cover class 11 Chemistry 2nd Chapter in 5 minutes without any hypothesis and boring topics - I like this.
@KarimdadSamim
@KarimdadSamim 3 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic description!!!! Love this. I hope you to share more chemistry teaching videos.
@iwillseeyou8147
@iwillseeyou8147 3 жыл бұрын
This men can explain anything very perfectly
@wigo54
@wigo54 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jared, this is by far the clearest and simplest explanation of what an atom is like! This is great! Gongratulations!
@amitpatil5151
@amitpatil5151 5 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. Jared Owens....! Very good explanation. I liked it very much. Very Simple language. Easy to understand.
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Amit! Glad you liked it
@keshavbajaj9308
@keshavbajaj9308 3 жыл бұрын
It's incredible how you explained something for which teachers take 2-3 hours of classes in 5 minutes.
@BrenoKretzer
@BrenoKretzer 2 жыл бұрын
"What's the smallest thing you can think of?" Me: Planck's length.
@inzpired3371
@inzpired3371 5 жыл бұрын
WORLD Best Knowledge. Bestest Vedio. No comment
@Jr_Scientist
@Jr_Scientist Жыл бұрын
The only 1 video everyone watch without skipping 👊💥
@SWARAJSINGH2008
@SWARAJSINGH2008 5 жыл бұрын
This is very ironic that still today we hold the belief that electron's position is not predictable. The true statement should be that the position of electron is predictable but we have no data or technology to observe and predict the same. Actually the electron is bound to rotate around the nucleus to generate the required outer or centrifugal force and at the same time it undergoes the effects due to various electric and magnetic forces acting upon it caused by the motion of nearby electrons. We are not technologically advanced enough to know the static position of all the electrons and their velocity vectors simultaneously, which is must to generate or simulate the position of any electron.
@FobbitMike
@FobbitMike 5 жыл бұрын
This is not a belief. My friend, you need to study quantum mechanics before making such comments.
@SWARAJSINGH2008
@SWARAJSINGH2008 5 жыл бұрын
@@FobbitMike, QM is not able to give the real picture, as our brain or intelligence can visualize. No matter how small and fast a particle is, it is obeying every rule of physics, it's position or motion is exactly according to physics and mathematics, but it's speed being close to light and size being so small, we are unable to observe and analyse. Further the motion of electron is under the influence of too many varying forces, because of the other charged particles motion nearby which generates electric and magnetic forces, causing the electron to continually change it's course making wave like motion instead of straight motion . The motion is not random or without a cause, but is so complex that neither we can observe nor we could compute.
@wootle
@wootle 4 жыл бұрын
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 You are completely mistaken. The normal rules of physics break down at the quantum level. It is exactly as Jared said. We cannot predict exactly where an electron will be. Just the ACT of observing affects the outcome. Sounds freaky but its true.
@negasonicteenagewarhead
@negasonicteenagewarhead 4 жыл бұрын
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 but electrons have dual nature
@AMadKerbal
@AMadKerbal 3 жыл бұрын
You explain better than a whole chapter on an atom.
@9_1.1
@9_1.1 Жыл бұрын
using this, there is ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or about two nonillion hydrogen atoms in a meter^3 block of pure hydrogen (assuming they’re all packed together)
@thecreativekanha5181
@thecreativekanha5181 2 жыл бұрын
Obviously the best video for understanding the concept
@KevinGeneFeldman
@KevinGeneFeldman 3 жыл бұрын
An interesting thought I've always had about motion. Think of life like pixels, how movement on the screen jumps from one pixel to the next pixel. Now scale down movement in real life to the smallest grid of spacial positioning, so obviously we can move a distance and then break down all the tiny measurements of movements between it and then all of the tiny measurements of movement between the between, but once you get down to the atomic level, whats the tiny measurements of movements between the space of one atom to the adjacent one? How does one move an atoms distance and not be able to further break down the movement with ever more infinitely expanding integers of measurement? At some point don't we just...teleport places? were in this space and then instantly we're in the next, because there is no more space between.
@doomtho42
@doomtho42 Жыл бұрын
That’s kinda/sorta the idea of planck length. Although I think it’s also important to remember that reality often does not align with our intuition, and that just because something is intellectually satisfying and/or makes intuitive sense doesn’t mean it’s true.
@chelsealangel3843
@chelsealangel3843 4 жыл бұрын
I used to hate my chemistry class way back in college days. Explaining like this would help a lot even now it's helping.
@TaiFerret
@TaiFerret 6 жыл бұрын
What if atoms have more dimensions than we have on our scale?
@shubhranshrai
@shubhranshrai 5 жыл бұрын
why don't you have more likes?
@srisankalpamishra3006
@srisankalpamishra3006 4 жыл бұрын
Quite interesting!
@farhanaf832
@farhanaf832 7 ай бұрын
String theory ❤
@SaadAliArts
@SaadAliArts 5 жыл бұрын
Your animation is amazing. Please make more videos of science, buildings and space
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
Coming up soon! thanks Saad
@babygoatjuice9508
@babygoatjuice9508 5 жыл бұрын
Keep it up bro, great video
@MarioDallaRiva
@MarioDallaRiva 3 жыл бұрын
Super video! The music is incredibly distracting. I'd like to see in future a way to disable background audio tracks to satisfy all viewers.
@lohphat
@lohphat 5 жыл бұрын
Ångstrom needs the ring above the “A”. Like other languages which use accents, leaving it off is considered a spelling error as the sound is changed.
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
yeah I probably should have added that in...
@EDUTAINMENT56
@EDUTAINMENT56 4 жыл бұрын
Really good animation for better understanding
@OddlyTugs
@OddlyTugs 7 жыл бұрын
Another great video fella, thanks!
@MalminOG
@MalminOG 6 жыл бұрын
NOTHING BETTER THAN CHEERIOS
@ahmedabuswerih316
@ahmedabuswerih316 5 жыл бұрын
your explanation is the best . keep it going
@09Rickhunter
@09Rickhunter 5 жыл бұрын
I give science class to 6th graders. I taught em something similar. I'm happy to know that my class wasn't that bad! 😅
@disht2
@disht2 5 жыл бұрын
Good thing youre not an English teacher.....
@09Rickhunter
@09Rickhunter 5 жыл бұрын
@@disht2 why?
@disht2
@disht2 5 жыл бұрын
@@09Rickhunter "I give science class to 6th graders."
@rogerlau3816
@rogerlau3816 Жыл бұрын
2-D viewer says electrons move in different energy levels, like a ring. 3-D viewer says they move in different orbits. 4-D or 3-D+time factor viewer says it is a cloud. The time factor here may be talking about time in very small dimension, perhaps shorter than Planck time. Therefore electrons may move faster than light speed.
@emrazum
@emrazum 5 жыл бұрын
Before clicking I was like psssh here's another bs physics videos that says atoms are like small solar systems, but you went Quantum with it, Loved it!!
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@erickyei965
@erickyei965 4 жыл бұрын
El'Dar R
@Roberto-REME
@Roberto-REME 3 жыл бұрын
Jared, you did an outstanding job producing the video as well as the narration. Really well done! Too short though. Now, please tackle a). the nature of light, b). the speed of light, c). the double slit experiment, d). quantum physics..... 😁
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Roberto - I will do more videos like this in the future!
@awayforthewin1325
@awayforthewin1325 6 жыл бұрын
Your channel is lit You deserve more attention
@TomTalley
@TomTalley Жыл бұрын
Just found your video because the algorithm saw that I am interested in animations of string theory. Would you consider updating this video to include some indications of wavelengths and frequencies with photons carrying specific amount of energy being ""grabbed" by an electron...
@Gurseerat_Singh
@Gurseerat_Singh 2 жыл бұрын
In India we learn this in school instead of college
@fcyrizz
@fcyrizz 4 ай бұрын
That most of us never needed to learn
@fcyrizz
@fcyrizz 4 ай бұрын
In the school
@segsfault
@segsfault 8 ай бұрын
as a matter of fact, orbitals themselves are just 3d-spaces of probability. orbitals have "areas" where the probability of finding an electron is higher than in the other places in the orbital.
@Spherey
@Spherey 5 жыл бұрын
If a nucleus is made of quarks, then what are quarks made of?
@imnotcalm4875
@imnotcalm4875 5 жыл бұрын
*TOP 10 QUESTIONS SCIENTIST STILL CAN'T ANSWER*
@SuryanIsaac
@SuryanIsaac 5 жыл бұрын
energy
@deathbyseatoast8854
@deathbyseatoast8854 5 жыл бұрын
*Thanos*
@Prxwler
@Prxwler 5 жыл бұрын
Quarks are elemental particles
@ronaldvlogs5527
@ronaldvlogs5527 5 жыл бұрын
if u have been taught in chemistry class a quark is combined to form many particles called hadrons it is the most stable of which are protons and neutrons
@subhradeepghosh2523
@subhradeepghosh2523 3 жыл бұрын
A great video with epic background music!
@40watt53
@40watt53 5 жыл бұрын
Jared: Whats the smallest thing you can think of? Me: Fundamental Particles. Jared: ...okay then
@vehicleboi5598
@vehicleboi5598 5 жыл бұрын
How about...... *the fabric of space itself?*
@TempSlothy
@TempSlothy 5 жыл бұрын
I think my male reproductive organ is smaller. There are children that might read this.
@rd6336
@rd6336 4 жыл бұрын
Your vedios are best. So go on in making such necessary vedios. Thanks bro.
@dek5775
@dek5775 5 жыл бұрын
Do flat earthers believe in atoms?
@Max_Jacoby
@Max_Jacoby 5 жыл бұрын
Only if they are flat.
@Akyomi777
@Akyomi777 5 жыл бұрын
@@Max_Jacoby lmao you killed it
@That_One_Guy...
@That_One_Guy... 5 жыл бұрын
They believe an atom is a cube
@नारायण-य8छ
@नारायण-य8छ 4 жыл бұрын
Makes me wonder if all the flat-earthers’ wives have flat chests 🤔
@Hartfeltet
@Hartfeltet 4 жыл бұрын
They call em Flatoms
@saathwikaithal7403
@saathwikaithal7403 2 жыл бұрын
1:03 virus has RNA 🤣🤣🤣
@ice0817
@ice0817 2 жыл бұрын
Every living thing has dna
@ivanminjares3758
@ivanminjares3758 Жыл бұрын
​@ice0817 that is true but first of all viruses are technically not alive and 2nd a virus has RNA not DNA and please don't spam this emoji -----> 🤓
@larrypatterson3957
@larrypatterson3957 4 жыл бұрын
Great animations and explanations!
@coolbro8922
@coolbro8922 3 жыл бұрын
I guess DNA is more popular than RNA
@anadikumarchatterjee2206
@anadikumarchatterjee2206 4 жыл бұрын
I'm the grandson of that very person in whose name this account is named, and I'm from West Bengal, India. I read in Class 10, and just have started to know about the electronic configuration and subshells. When at first I came to know about these, I thought that the shells and subshells are a 2d and flat object. But seeing this video I got a complete and clear concept about how the subshells actually look like. I will be grateful to you and your video. Would be more happy if you create more videos about the electronic configuration and etc. You're a great teacher. Good Night. Shubh Ratri.
@ammyhunt3613
@ammyhunt3613 5 жыл бұрын
In India we learn this in higher school not in College
@ghantasalaravindrakumar4057
@ghantasalaravindrakumar4057 5 жыл бұрын
ammyhunt yes right from 6th onwards...........
@mahender1
@mahender1 4 жыл бұрын
@@devnampriyapriyadarshi1331 bro didn't you read 11th chemistry book it is there in perhaps 2-3 chapter about orbitals and its shape
@nisargbhavsar25
@nisargbhavsar25 4 жыл бұрын
Correct
@twelvegr
@twelvegr 4 жыл бұрын
And we are thought this in high school not only India siss
@amitsaxena6175
@amitsaxena6175 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent it helps to understand and also removes misunderstanding in children
@arturocastro4835
@arturocastro4835 5 жыл бұрын
0:34 MY DING DONG
@FaceLessDude-7G
@FaceLessDude-7G 28 күн бұрын
LMAO 😭
@lingarajlingaraj1795
@lingarajlingaraj1795 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your animation I was not getting idea for orbital thanks for it
@jumandas3198
@jumandas3198 7 жыл бұрын
explain it in terms of quantum mechanics
@SagarYadav-jd9lv
@SagarYadav-jd9lv 4 жыл бұрын
What a great explanation of atom!
@inverted_paradox4170
@inverted_paradox4170 5 жыл бұрын
Americans: who is meter?
@FobbitMike
@FobbitMike 5 жыл бұрын
meter is a good guy. I call him Bill.
@belashetye3868
@belashetye3868 4 жыл бұрын
@@FobbitMike do you know I found that meter is married to litre???😂😂😂😂
@Greenierw
@Greenierw 4 жыл бұрын
@@belashetye3868 and do you know their son centimeter?
@belashetye3868
@belashetye3868 4 жыл бұрын
@@Greenierw omg yeah I do... he's a really good kid.😂😂😂😂
@stevepr100
@stevepr100 4 жыл бұрын
Latest addition to brood is smaller than the rest.......Micro meter😱
@daamu48
@daamu48 5 жыл бұрын
Super presentation. An excellent contribution to the children to enhance their scientific knowledge.
@marceloazotief3144
@marceloazotief3144 5 жыл бұрын
Paradoxes of atomism If it were possible to continue the division of matter indefinitely, I would have thought it more probable that this process could be carried out to infinity (thesis of infinite divisibility, contrary to atomistic antithesis). The problem is that we can not and do not have the colossal force to do this, because we are physically limited, we can only at most split up to a few fractions of sand, because we can not get the pieces too small to be divided again and so on , only the cosmic forces of the universe could make or a God out of infinite power. It results in unsustainable paradoxes and absurdities to defend the thesis of the existence of indivisible material entities / elements, the atoms, as they considered Democritus and Leucippus, a thesis that Aristotle correctly rejected. Why do we have to accept the existence of atoms if experience shows us that all compound bodies are divisible indefinitely to our last tactile-sensitive limits? If all the material elements are breakable into smaller parts, from the softest to the hardest, an iron bar when we hit it kneads and looses small pieces of metal and sparks of fire - energy, revealing its divisibility to us, why then do we have to to accept that atoms (indivisible fragments of matter) exist? This atomistic thesis leads us to the paradox well demonstrated by Anaxagoras and Aristotle, that the parts are greater than the sum of the whole, for the components of the self are indivisible and not eternal. The results are the only and most perfect to be realized in all corpus of corruptible and mortal, which results in the refutation of atomism by reduction to the absurd. Another paradox reveals itself is not a fact of existing atoms but is not necessarily indivisible, it is not necessary to prepare an atom for its existence, for who can be indivisible, the ultimate of existence, eternal, indestructible, immune to all sorts of shocks and destructions. Existing and eternal exist, to probe and to separate the various clusters in concentrated points without space, resulting in an inexistence of cohesion / physical concretion and consequent non-existence of visualizing the bodies and material bodies! In what results in a further logical - qualitative refutation of atomism, by a new reduction to the absurd. And finally, indivisible and eternal atoms unite with other equally indivisible and eternal atoms, through connections made of finite and divisible matter as is our physical - corporeal composition and that of all the animate and inanimate bodies of the world, is an absurd total in this thesis, for where would arise a divisible and finite matter that binds atoms, if these same atoms are all indivisible, eternal and indestructible particles? Of the very primordial atoms that gave birth to the whole universe? But would a finite and divisible matter arising from indivisible and eternal atoms not be an unacceptable corruption of the eternal and indivisible essence of atoms? An indivisible atom that gives rise to a divisible matter would not have to possess the germ of divisibility in its essence, revealing in the truth that it is no atom, but a corruptible and perfectly divisible matter, which would refute the very Democritean thesis of existence of atoms? Do you perceive so much of metaphysical absurdities, paradoxes, and idiosyncrasies that the theory of atoms has borne since over 2600 years ago? In the antithesis to the atomist theory, we can not observe and test the process of division ad infinitum, because obviously we have spatial and physical - temporal limits, but at least it is indirectly based on ordinary experience, being a much more rational and scientific hypothesis than considering the hypothesis of finite divisibility in final and eternal atoms, for we have no example of phenomenon or object observable in experience that is indivisible, indestructible, incorruptible, and eternal, whereas for the philosophical hypothesis of indefinite or infinite divisibility we have the support of a sensory experience that all objects, bodies and physical phenomena are divisible or decomposable into smaller, corruptible and destructible parts!
@weiner3393
@weiner3393 5 жыл бұрын
what
@weiner3393
@weiner3393 5 жыл бұрын
This comment is too much for my brain
@carisj4947
@carisj4947 Жыл бұрын
Hi Jared, I have just discovered your content and I wanted to tell you I think you are awesome. The speed at which you talk is perfect and so easy to understand and follow. I also liked that you did not ask me to like, subscribe and hit the bell for notifications in this video. Your animation was fantastic.
@hkayakh
@hkayakh 5 жыл бұрын
Bro you should colab with kurzgesagt
@garykuovideos
@garykuovideos 5 жыл бұрын
I’m tellin’ ya, these electrons today. They’re outta CONTROL!
@aryan07co45
@aryan07co45 5 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@ani3731
@ani3731 5 жыл бұрын
Atomic structure in 5 mins 😂😂😂
@amanrthosarart2280
@amanrthosarart2280 4 жыл бұрын
allaboutchemistry123.blogspot.com/2020/04/atoms-and-molecules-what-are-atoms-and-molecules.html
@durairam976
@durairam976 2 жыл бұрын
Superb animation and background score
@kamalhossain2267
@kamalhossain2267 2 жыл бұрын
Nice video, nice presentation and explanation. But one thing i want to know, as proton, neutron and electron are invisible even in powerful microscope, so, is the explanation just hypothetical or it has the reality?
@APoxyR8
@APoxyR8 4 жыл бұрын
I finally understand the uncertainty principle. I always you couldn’t know position and velocity together. Either one or the other but I never knew why. This animation cleared this for me.
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 4 жыл бұрын
Glad to help Alex!
@vidajugg
@vidajugg 4 жыл бұрын
An atom itself is made up of three tiny kinds of particles called subatomic particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. In my view, subatomic particles are made of infinitely divisible levels of a moment in time. Khalid Masood
@vinaymanthri6742
@vinaymanthri6742 4 жыл бұрын
I have never seen such video with that much clear understanding Thank you so much sir
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome!
@Roberto-REME
@Roberto-REME Жыл бұрын
Outstanding video, Jared. Superb graphics, excellent narration, and deft ability to display the facts in an interesting and engaging way. Well done!
@maacpiash
@maacpiash 4 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, you just removed my confusion about the orbitals and the movement of the electrons in atoms that my high school teacher had put in my mind eight years ago!
@Bhupindersingh-zf2wk
@Bhupindersingh-zf2wk 3 жыл бұрын
I took almost 3 hours to read the atomic models and quantum mechanics but u jst completed it in 5 min ...its amazing ...we all appreciate ur efforts
@potawatomi100
@potawatomi100 5 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video Jared.
@JaredOwen
@JaredOwen 5 жыл бұрын
😎
@anshulgoyal111
@anshulgoyal111 4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation! The video name is less descriptive of the content... How small is an atom and how detailed is it's structure. something like that. Thank you for such a great video. It's perfect.
@stevena3244
@stevena3244 3 жыл бұрын
I remember my first expedition to the North Pole and seeing the huge red arrow overhead. Try to tell this to kids these days and they're just not interested.
@subtitles1492
@subtitles1492 3 жыл бұрын
1:22 somebody give that nervous clarinet player a tranquilizer shot! 😉
@imranhaider8248
@imranhaider8248 2 жыл бұрын
Best animations i have ever seen.. hats off
@igorbruhanov9176
@igorbruhanov9176 10 ай бұрын
Jarad, thanks a lot for your fascinating videos. Surprisingly they proved to be best learning materials I found on KZbin for my 11-years old son to study English.
@anutiwari2120
@anutiwari2120 Жыл бұрын
Please also make an animated video on 'What happens when atoms of different elements bond together'....
@harikhabar
@harikhabar 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing Animation and explaination. Nice Sir, thanks
How do Electron Microscopes Work? 🔬🛠🔬 Taking Pictures of Atoms
19:54
Branch Education
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
How does an Electric Motor work?  (DC Motor)
10:03
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
АЗАРТНИК 4 |СЕЗОН 1 Серия
40:47
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
What Does An Atom REALLY Look Like?
8:44
The Science Asylum
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
I misunderstood Schrödinger's cat for years! (I finally get it!)
20:52
FloatHeadPhysics
Рет қаралды 438 М.
What happened to the Hindenburg?
8:08
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Is It Possible To Completely Fill a Klein Bottle?
7:01
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
How does a Speed Cube work? (Fast Rubik's Cube)
9:58
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 759 М.
Simulating the Evolution of Aggression
13:17
Primer
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
A Better Way To Picture Atoms
5:35
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
How does a Mars Rover work? (Perseverance)
17:35
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
Something weird happens when you keep squeezing
11:36
Vox
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН