I am a chemist with a master degree in chemistry, and I have to say that this is not something that is easy to understand and explain, so I admire your intelligent and the effort :D
@imadakhunkhail33605 жыл бұрын
You say ture
@vigneshkumar15665 жыл бұрын
I am chemist Indian hii
@sontubanerjee99495 жыл бұрын
I am in high school but I got a clear idea about everything from Heisenberg's uncertanity principle,shapes of orbitals,filling of electrons to Schrodinger's atomic model.
@SubconscVoice5 жыл бұрын
sir would u like to make video over orbitals
@rashidnn13675 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ailiasim3 жыл бұрын
Your animation and explanation of a few minutes is better than whole chapters of textbooks and tens of hours of learning and infinite hours of trying to understand this.
@JaredOwen3 жыл бұрын
Glad to help😁
@princeclassen2 жыл бұрын
Where do you study man ?? Probably you don't have reading habit. Even if you will read it through the book, You will get it. 🤣
@RajKumar-ws3oq2 жыл бұрын
Yup, got some clarity of that concept after watching this
@neetaspirants594 Жыл бұрын
Gud To see some shias on KZbin ♥️ I Am also Shia Muslim
@Usriri_4891Ай бұрын
@@neetaspirants594 You are most welcome
@DipanjanAdhikary184 жыл бұрын
Only legends know that they watched JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Bohr, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schroedinger's theories in just 5 minutes .
@nisargbhavsar254 жыл бұрын
Correct!!
@akshatpatidar27974 жыл бұрын
Molecular orbital theory as well
@krishnannarayanan88194 жыл бұрын
So am I a legend?
@vijaydharmadhikari24404 жыл бұрын
👍
@fahadnadeem88203 жыл бұрын
You missed the boss Means Planks .....
@theswapniljagtap5 жыл бұрын
Ohhh, so that's the reason I failed in chemistry.
@ekshayari_jk5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@dnhn.design5 жыл бұрын
Lmfaooo
@randomamericansoldier85865 жыл бұрын
Really
@provasinisinha9274 жыл бұрын
I score 95 marks in chemistry
@MidlandTexan3 жыл бұрын
aye, the moles ate holes in my understanding...
@_baller4 жыл бұрын
Electrons are like camera flashes at a stadium
@masonjelvin60014 жыл бұрын
good fucking analogy
@marvaabyu1979 ай бұрын
Damn.. it was in fact, a good fucking analogy
@donnypangilinan26366 жыл бұрын
there's so many scientists here... and I'm like an ancient human watching the video only for damn school projects Btw, it's a helpful video :)
@JaredOwen6 жыл бұрын
Glad my video is helping Donny! Good luck on the project
@sanchits.47854 жыл бұрын
Yup, apparently, i didn't knew that scientist revealing who they are are so common on yt. Damn, scientists saying, "I'm a scientist" on every science video.
@dragongamer91603 жыл бұрын
R you really donny??!!
@farhanaf83211 ай бұрын
We can help scientists by processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️
@DadsCornerLew3 жыл бұрын
Possibly the simplest most concise explanation of the difference between orbit and orbitals that I've come across. Thanks!
@rajk.90985 жыл бұрын
I whish my teacher could explain like this when I was in college!
@rajpawar93434 жыл бұрын
It means it's time ro update our studies.
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB4 жыл бұрын
are you a fool
@negasonicteenagewarhead4 жыл бұрын
Even 12th students know more than this video
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB4 жыл бұрын
Are you a old person ?
@PrayashRanjanMohantyB4 жыл бұрын
Very very old person
@bas96825 жыл бұрын
So an electron is just a dvd logo bouncing on your screen.
@hbt255 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment
@greenlemon30285 жыл бұрын
So true lmao
@marck00605 жыл бұрын
No it's the default Windows XP screensaver
@yolt-v2i5 жыл бұрын
An electron is just a dvd logo touching the corner of your monitor. Its unpredictable. 😁
@jimmynobody83445 жыл бұрын
Mine Bomber not really. You think it’s gonna hit the corner, but it never does.
@arindamsarkar3704 жыл бұрын
This video is so brilliantly put together! The animation went hand-in-hand with the narration and gave a good perspective on what's bigger and what's smaller; which comes first and whioch comes later? The size and order was aptly explained. Thank you!
@JaredOwen4 жыл бұрын
😎
@AJOlesen5 жыл бұрын
Jared: “what is the smallest thing you can think of?” Me: quarks
@The_zenithgod5 жыл бұрын
Fr that’s what I thought
@person80645 жыл бұрын
Plank's length or string theory
@AJOlesen5 жыл бұрын
Person GG man, I don’t think their something smaller than that
@ahmedabuswerih3165 жыл бұрын
AJ Olesen Jared owen : hold my quarks
@niekparidaens81705 жыл бұрын
or the higgs particle
@RealClassyStudios3 жыл бұрын
Why are all the KZbinrs that would make great teachers not teachers and we’re stuck with “refer to page [Number] in the Textbook” Love your content dude
@DamianTaboada11 күн бұрын
Porque en un trabajo técnico, cuando tengas dudas sobre ciertos temas, tendras que aprender a consultar libros de textos. No van a haber videos que expliquen tus dudas exactas.
@geekdiggy4 жыл бұрын
school teacher: sit down and lemme learn you some science jared owen: i'm bout to wreck this man's whole career
@nafishsarwar20774 жыл бұрын
This is what Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is all about. Very nicely explained. Thanks.
why heisannberg invent this principle🥺🥺 lead to made chemistry with unlimted studies materials from schools
@shaurya_aggarwal_G4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jared, I m a PCM student. This video was amazing since it allows us to easily visualize about this topic but I have small request here Can u pls pls pls make another video on this topic covering more topics deeply It will be really helpful for students...... Pls pls pls I m requesting this from u coz after watching ur video I came to know that u r the only person who can turn this topic into realistic animation Sir pls pls pls help It will be really helpful I promise that I will be sharing that to all my frns....
@Anonymous-kw7ls3 жыл бұрын
There are other KZbin channels too who cover such science topics very easily and explain them in animated form.
@mumkichux3 жыл бұрын
@@Anonymous-kw7ls please tell me some. I will be grateful ☺️
@Sãf4ron53 жыл бұрын
Really I need it too...I'm also a PCM student...🖖🖖🖖 videos like this really make things easier..
@mumkichux3 жыл бұрын
@@Sãf4ron5 u can refer to TYLER DEWITT videos for chemistry . He's a great guy
@mumkichux3 жыл бұрын
@@Sãf4ron5 I just came here coz of that atomic structure chapter. that's hard 😕
@BlackElon13 жыл бұрын
Short ... sweet... simple.... and the BEST part is that it's understandable.... I LOVE IT!. thank you
@YoDay5 жыл бұрын
I thought orbitals and orbits are same. KZbin > School Thanks!
@CrypticFate53 жыл бұрын
@Jeet Pratap Singh you've written it otherway round.... orbitals are the area where the probability of finding an electron is max..
@profefaro3 ай бұрын
One of the best videos I have discovered to explain in a didactic way the size of an atom
@aquibkhan93853 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this helped me visualize chemistry. Thank you 😭😭
@johnnyroy98304 жыл бұрын
1:56 *As a Bharatiya (better known as Indians), it is quiet disappointing for me to see and hear from the world the fact that the Greeks researched everything. The innumerable ideas and inventions and discoveries, from atoms to radios to airplanes as well, originally germinated in this great country, but are now proudly published by others as their own work. When the world didn't even know to speak, Bharat was the only country to have had universities. The most scientific language known to the world, The Holy Sanskrit, originated here. The first successful surgery was carried out here. The very first well-developed civilization flourished in the Indus valley. There's a lot more for which you'll probably need a lifetime (or maybe two). And all these things took place around 5000BC !!!* *Hope you understated. Thank you*
@blueeye22814 жыл бұрын
I know bro how it feels. Actually those damn British are the reason we are so underrated.
@issaaczala51254 жыл бұрын
Do "Bharat" existed before 1950 ? Any proof or reference ? All what you have cited is myth. Before 3000 years existing India was belong to Buddha, not hindu. Read facts please not myths.
@johnnyroy98304 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125 😂😂😂
@johnnyroy98304 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125I appreciate your knowledge sir...😂😁😂😂
@johnnyroy98304 жыл бұрын
@@issaaczala5125 Surely from "Foxford University"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@chrism33445 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I've ever seen..so easy to understand..well done fellow!
@thecreativekanha51813 жыл бұрын
Obviously the best video for understanding the concept
@rawmyaaj23257 жыл бұрын
So reality is basically vibrating energy.
@tonezstonezkonez5757 жыл бұрын
rawm yaaj ....yip, kinda like our "consciousness"
@rawmyaaj23257 жыл бұрын
tonez I think when they say God created us in his image... I think they're talking about consciousness. Seem like consciousness is immaterial, but is the only real thing that truly exist.
@morningmadera7 жыл бұрын
lol
@acmefixer17 жыл бұрын
Mr. ConcealedCheese So, are you available to do magic shows for kids?? :-O
@fabian88136 жыл бұрын
Cheers for the Video! Sorry for chiming in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you tried - Taparton Growing Program Takeover (search on google)? It is a great one off guide for learning how to get a bigger manhood minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy after a lifetime of fighting got excellent success with it.
@celebritystylewatch4 жыл бұрын
Im a chemistry teacher i know its actually tough to teach but yiu did it Amazingly. Suplendid
@JaredOwen4 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@Xrossbot4 жыл бұрын
Finally after finding lots of video... Got this masterpiece
@doremon-ug3tr Жыл бұрын
Now the concept is clear thenks!!!! For making this video ..... ❤ the explanation was super cool.......hats off to your work 👍🏿
@EnerJetix5 жыл бұрын
Just so I can remember when I watch this... 1 Angstrom=100 Femtometers Edit: Thanks past me
@ahmedaltaf121315 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@m.w.kaplan4474 жыл бұрын
aint got no one but yourself in this world
@EnerJetix4 жыл бұрын
@@zoraizahmad6536 no.
@supernatural_forces3 жыл бұрын
Smaller than Nanometers there are Picometers. Then there are Femtometers ? And, quarks are measured in Femtometers, the Nucleus of an atom are known as quarks. Which is possibly the smallest particle the microscopes can see.
@subhradeepghosh25233 жыл бұрын
A great video with epic background music!
@khush42364 жыл бұрын
Group of atoms, seeing a group of atoms on a group of atoms that how small an atom is....!
@AMadKerbal3 жыл бұрын
You explain better than a whole chapter on an atom.
@tarangpatil69527 жыл бұрын
Why not just tell them about Heisenbergs Uncertainity Principle
@dankhank85695 жыл бұрын
Tarang Patil If we want to learn how to make meth we will look it up.
@giantsquid25 жыл бұрын
Because as he stated, he wanted to keep it simple
@narendramodicommunistversi44665 жыл бұрын
That is because, wouldnyou understand any bits of Schrödinger's wave equation on 9th standard? You need to know advanced mathematics like calculus, surds and logs for that.
@sontubanerjee99495 жыл бұрын
Sure
@sontubanerjee99495 жыл бұрын
@@narendramodicommunistversi4466 It was the reason for the failure of Bhor's atomic model.
@iwillseeyou81473 жыл бұрын
This men can explain anything very perfectly
@inzpired33715 жыл бұрын
WORLD Best Knowledge. Bestest Vedio. No comment
@amitpatil51516 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. Jared Owens....! Very good explanation. I liked it very much. Very Simple language. Easy to understand.
@JaredOwen6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Amit! Glad you liked it
@DAILYTECHNEED7 жыл бұрын
make it more more complex please
@filthyfilter27987 жыл бұрын
:D y indeed :D it looked really interesting ^_^
@JaredOwen7 жыл бұрын
What should I go more in depth on? I plan on making a follow up video in the future. I think orbitals is a topic I'd like to do more of
@DAILYTECHNEED7 жыл бұрын
Jared Owen that would be great and thanks a lot for the reply.
@undertheradar46457 жыл бұрын
Perhaps break down four quantum numbers.
@PavelSTL7 жыл бұрын
@Jared "What should I go more in depth on? " I would try to explain what electrons are in the context of Quantum Field theory, since that's the "right" way of thinking about matter these days. So an electron is a perturbation in a "electron" field (like a photon is a perturbation in an EM field), but what does that mean?
@potawatomi1006 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video Jared.
@JaredOwen6 жыл бұрын
😎
@dek57756 жыл бұрын
Do flat earthers believe in atoms?
@Max_Jacoby5 жыл бұрын
Only if they are flat.
@Akyomi7775 жыл бұрын
@@Max_Jacoby lmao you killed it
@That_One_Guy...5 жыл бұрын
They believe an atom is a cube
@नारायण-य8छ5 жыл бұрын
Makes me wonder if all the flat-earthers’ wives have flat chests 🤔
@Hartfeltet5 жыл бұрын
They call em Flatoms
@ahmedabuswerih3165 жыл бұрын
your explanation is the best . keep it going
@babygoatjuice95085 жыл бұрын
Keep it up bro, great video
@imranhaider82483 жыл бұрын
Best animations i have ever seen.. hats off
@KarimdadSamim3 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic description!!!! Love this. I hope you to share more chemistry teaching videos.
@rd63364 жыл бұрын
Your vedios are best. So go on in making such necessary vedios. Thanks bro.
@carlosnieto31896 жыл бұрын
Your Animation techniques accelerate the insight of one's mind... Good Job!
@BrenoKretzer3 жыл бұрын
"What's the smallest thing you can think of?" Me: Planck's length.
@wigo544 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jared, this is by far the clearest and simplest explanation of what an atom is like! This is great! Gongratulations!
@vis84283 жыл бұрын
wow ............... unbelievable teaching sir really u just completed , JJ Thompson, Rutherford, Chadwick ,Bohr, Heisenberg, De Broglie, Schroedinger's theories in just 5 minutes ...., huge thumsup .........for u ....... SARNGHAE ..........
@OddlyTugs8 жыл бұрын
Another great video fella, thanks!
@MalminOG7 жыл бұрын
NOTHING BETTER THAN CHEERIOS
@vinaymanthri67424 жыл бұрын
I have never seen such video with that much clear understanding Thank you so much sir
@JaredOwen4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome!
@keshavbajaj93083 жыл бұрын
It's incredible how you explained something for which teachers take 2-3 hours of classes in 5 minutes.
@durairam9762 жыл бұрын
Superb animation and background score
@SWARAJSINGH20085 жыл бұрын
This is very ironic that still today we hold the belief that electron's position is not predictable. The true statement should be that the position of electron is predictable but we have no data or technology to observe and predict the same. Actually the electron is bound to rotate around the nucleus to generate the required outer or centrifugal force and at the same time it undergoes the effects due to various electric and magnetic forces acting upon it caused by the motion of nearby electrons. We are not technologically advanced enough to know the static position of all the electrons and their velocity vectors simultaneously, which is must to generate or simulate the position of any electron.
@FobbitMike5 жыл бұрын
This is not a belief. My friend, you need to study quantum mechanics before making such comments.
@SWARAJSINGH20085 жыл бұрын
@@FobbitMike, QM is not able to give the real picture, as our brain or intelligence can visualize. No matter how small and fast a particle is, it is obeying every rule of physics, it's position or motion is exactly according to physics and mathematics, but it's speed being close to light and size being so small, we are unable to observe and analyse. Further the motion of electron is under the influence of too many varying forces, because of the other charged particles motion nearby which generates electric and magnetic forces, causing the electron to continually change it's course making wave like motion instead of straight motion . The motion is not random or without a cause, but is so complex that neither we can observe nor we could compute.
@CyberSystemOverload4 жыл бұрын
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 You are completely mistaken. The normal rules of physics break down at the quantum level. It is exactly as Jared said. We cannot predict exactly where an electron will be. Just the ACT of observing affects the outcome. Sounds freaky but its true.
@negasonicteenagewarhead4 жыл бұрын
@@SWARAJSINGH2008 but electrons have dual nature
@harikhabar3 жыл бұрын
Amazing Animation and explaination. Nice Sir, thanks
@emrazum6 жыл бұрын
Before clicking I was like psssh here's another bs physics videos that says atoms are like small solar systems, but you went Quantum with it, Loved it!!
@JaredOwen6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@erickyei9655 жыл бұрын
El'Dar R
@chelsealangel38434 жыл бұрын
I used to hate my chemistry class way back in college days. Explaining like this would help a lot even now it's helping.
@awayforthewin13256 жыл бұрын
Your channel is lit You deserve more attention
@SagarYadav-jd9lv5 жыл бұрын
What a great explanation of atom!
@09Rickhunter5 жыл бұрын
I give science class to 6th graders. I taught em something similar. I'm happy to know that my class wasn't that bad! 😅
@disht25 жыл бұрын
Good thing youre not an English teacher.....
@09Rickhunter5 жыл бұрын
@@disht2 why?
@disht25 жыл бұрын
@@09Rickhunter "I give science class to 6th graders."
@rabiabatool61184 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much I wish I had a teacher like you in my school time..... Thumbs up....
@TaiFerret7 жыл бұрын
What if atoms have more dimensions than we have on our scale?
@shubhranshrai5 жыл бұрын
why don't you have more likes?
@srisankalpamishra30064 жыл бұрын
Quite interesting!
@farhanaf83211 ай бұрын
String theory ❤
@prashantdhage56624 жыл бұрын
Your explanation is excellent
@Spherey6 жыл бұрын
If a nucleus is made of quarks, then what are quarks made of?
@imnotcalm48756 жыл бұрын
*TOP 10 QUESTIONS SCIENTIST STILL CAN'T ANSWER*
@SuryanIsaac6 жыл бұрын
energy
@deathbyseatoast88546 жыл бұрын
*Thanos*
@Prxwler6 жыл бұрын
Quarks are elemental particles
@ronaldvlogs55276 жыл бұрын
if u have been taught in chemistry class a quark is combined to form many particles called hadrons it is the most stable of which are protons and neutrons
@igorbruhanov9176 Жыл бұрын
Jarad, thanks a lot for your fascinating videos. Surprisingly they proved to be best learning materials I found on KZbin for my 11-years old son to study English.
@40watt535 жыл бұрын
Jared: Whats the smallest thing you can think of? Me: Fundamental Particles. Jared: ...okay then
@vehicleboi55985 жыл бұрын
How about...... *the fabric of space itself?*
@TempSlothy5 жыл бұрын
I think my male reproductive organ is smaller. There are children that might read this.
@Jr_Scientist2 жыл бұрын
The only 1 video everyone watch without skipping 👊💥
@9_1.12 жыл бұрын
using this, there is ~2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or about two nonillion hydrogen atoms in a meter^3 block of pure hydrogen (assuming they’re all packed together)
@amitsaxena61753 жыл бұрын
Excellent it helps to understand and also removes misunderstanding in children
@ammyhunt36135 жыл бұрын
In India we learn this in higher school not in College
@ghantasalaravindrakumar40575 жыл бұрын
ammyhunt yes right from 6th onwards...........
@mahender14 жыл бұрын
@@devnampriyapriyadarshi1331 bro didn't you read 11th chemistry book it is there in perhaps 2-3 chapter about orbitals and its shape
@nisargbhavsar254 жыл бұрын
Correct
@twelvegr4 жыл бұрын
And we are thought this in high school not only India siss
@boofang103 жыл бұрын
All the same, a BRILLIANT VIDEO, Jared !!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 .. simple yet impressionable
@inverted_paradox41705 жыл бұрын
Americans: who is meter?
@FobbitMike5 жыл бұрын
meter is a good guy. I call him Bill.
@belashetye38685 жыл бұрын
@@FobbitMike do you know I found that meter is married to litre???😂😂😂😂
@Greenierw5 жыл бұрын
@@belashetye3868 and do you know their son centimeter?
@belashetye38685 жыл бұрын
@@Greenierw omg yeah I do... he's a really good kid.😂😂😂😂
@stevepr1005 жыл бұрын
Latest addition to brood is smaller than the rest.......Micro meter😱
@EDUTAINMENT565 жыл бұрын
Really good animation for better understanding
@saathwikaithal74033 жыл бұрын
1:03 virus has RNA 🤣🤣🤣
@ice08173 жыл бұрын
Every living thing has dna
@ivanminjares3758 Жыл бұрын
@ice0817 that is true but first of all viruses are technically not alive and 2nd a virus has RNA not DNA and please don't spam this emoji -----> 🤓
@lingarajlingaraj17953 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your animation I was not getting idea for orbital thanks for it
@lohphat6 жыл бұрын
Ångstrom needs the ring above the “A”. Like other languages which use accents, leaving it off is considered a spelling error as the sound is changed.
@JaredOwen6 жыл бұрын
yeah I probably should have added that in...
@Roberto-REME4 жыл бұрын
Jared, you did an outstanding job producing the video as well as the narration. Really well done! Too short though. Now, please tackle a). the nature of light, b). the speed of light, c). the double slit experiment, d). quantum physics..... 😁
@JaredOwen4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Roberto - I will do more videos like this in the future!
@KevinGeneFeldman4 жыл бұрын
An interesting thought I've always had about motion. Think of life like pixels, how movement on the screen jumps from one pixel to the next pixel. Now scale down movement in real life to the smallest grid of spacial positioning, so obviously we can move a distance and then break down all the tiny measurements of movements between it and then all of the tiny measurements of movement between the between, but once you get down to the atomic level, whats the tiny measurements of movements between the space of one atom to the adjacent one? How does one move an atoms distance and not be able to further break down the movement with ever more infinitely expanding integers of measurement? At some point don't we just...teleport places? were in this space and then instantly we're in the next, because there is no more space between.
@doomtho42 Жыл бұрын
That’s kinda/sorta the idea of planck length. Although I think it’s also important to remember that reality often does not align with our intuition, and that just because something is intellectually satisfying and/or makes intuitive sense doesn’t mean it’s true.
@kausalyakalyanasundaram61225 жыл бұрын
good ..thanks..it took me 50 years to understand this ...my teachers were bullshit..great teaching..keep up the good work.
@JaredOwen5 жыл бұрын
😀
@coolbro89223 жыл бұрын
I guess DNA is more popular than RNA
@daamu485 жыл бұрын
Super presentation. An excellent contribution to the children to enhance their scientific knowledge.
@arturocastro48355 жыл бұрын
0:34 MY DING DONG
@FaceLessDude-7G4 ай бұрын
LMAO 😭
@vinaytiwari75284 жыл бұрын
Fentasttic!!! Bro please make more videos like this ☺ Thank you 🙂
Your animation is amazing. Please make more videos of science, buildings and space
@JaredOwen5 жыл бұрын
Coming up soon! thanks Saad
@hkayakh5 жыл бұрын
Bro you should colab with kurzgesagt
@PlanetEarth7904 ай бұрын
My teacher showed this video to my class, i wondered "Am i the only one that realized the video is made from you or there's other students in my class that knows you?"
@Gurseerat_Singh2 жыл бұрын
In India we learn this in school instead of college
@fcyrizz8 ай бұрын
That most of us never needed to learn
@fcyrizz8 ай бұрын
In the school
@maacpiash4 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, you just removed my confusion about the orbitals and the movement of the electrons in atoms that my high school teacher had put in my mind eight years ago!
@marceloazotief31446 жыл бұрын
Paradoxes of atomism If it were possible to continue the division of matter indefinitely, I would have thought it more probable that this process could be carried out to infinity (thesis of infinite divisibility, contrary to atomistic antithesis). The problem is that we can not and do not have the colossal force to do this, because we are physically limited, we can only at most split up to a few fractions of sand, because we can not get the pieces too small to be divided again and so on , only the cosmic forces of the universe could make or a God out of infinite power. It results in unsustainable paradoxes and absurdities to defend the thesis of the existence of indivisible material entities / elements, the atoms, as they considered Democritus and Leucippus, a thesis that Aristotle correctly rejected. Why do we have to accept the existence of atoms if experience shows us that all compound bodies are divisible indefinitely to our last tactile-sensitive limits? If all the material elements are breakable into smaller parts, from the softest to the hardest, an iron bar when we hit it kneads and looses small pieces of metal and sparks of fire - energy, revealing its divisibility to us, why then do we have to to accept that atoms (indivisible fragments of matter) exist? This atomistic thesis leads us to the paradox well demonstrated by Anaxagoras and Aristotle, that the parts are greater than the sum of the whole, for the components of the self are indivisible and not eternal. The results are the only and most perfect to be realized in all corpus of corruptible and mortal, which results in the refutation of atomism by reduction to the absurd. Another paradox reveals itself is not a fact of existing atoms but is not necessarily indivisible, it is not necessary to prepare an atom for its existence, for who can be indivisible, the ultimate of existence, eternal, indestructible, immune to all sorts of shocks and destructions. Existing and eternal exist, to probe and to separate the various clusters in concentrated points without space, resulting in an inexistence of cohesion / physical concretion and consequent non-existence of visualizing the bodies and material bodies! In what results in a further logical - qualitative refutation of atomism, by a new reduction to the absurd. And finally, indivisible and eternal atoms unite with other equally indivisible and eternal atoms, through connections made of finite and divisible matter as is our physical - corporeal composition and that of all the animate and inanimate bodies of the world, is an absurd total in this thesis, for where would arise a divisible and finite matter that binds atoms, if these same atoms are all indivisible, eternal and indestructible particles? Of the very primordial atoms that gave birth to the whole universe? But would a finite and divisible matter arising from indivisible and eternal atoms not be an unacceptable corruption of the eternal and indivisible essence of atoms? An indivisible atom that gives rise to a divisible matter would not have to possess the germ of divisibility in its essence, revealing in the truth that it is no atom, but a corruptible and perfectly divisible matter, which would refute the very Democritean thesis of existence of atoms? Do you perceive so much of metaphysical absurdities, paradoxes, and idiosyncrasies that the theory of atoms has borne since over 2600 years ago? In the antithesis to the atomist theory, we can not observe and test the process of division ad infinitum, because obviously we have spatial and physical - temporal limits, but at least it is indirectly based on ordinary experience, being a much more rational and scientific hypothesis than considering the hypothesis of finite divisibility in final and eternal atoms, for we have no example of phenomenon or object observable in experience that is indivisible, indestructible, incorruptible, and eternal, whereas for the philosophical hypothesis of indefinite or infinite divisibility we have the support of a sensory experience that all objects, bodies and physical phenomena are divisible or decomposable into smaller, corruptible and destructible parts!
@weiner33935 жыл бұрын
what
@weiner33935 жыл бұрын
This comment is too much for my brain
@aliabubakar14264 жыл бұрын
I wish I have learn this since I was in Chemistry class, keep blowing it Jared...
@neetaspirant20683 жыл бұрын
this is brilliant wow you are a genius!! this 5 min video managed to declutter so much mess from my head
@FOR_THE_Pascal.5 жыл бұрын
Finally, a clear and precise explanation!
@shisir_nayak23772 жыл бұрын
I am glad KZbin recommended me this 5 year old video.
@raja_khan_jcd3 жыл бұрын
Best way to explain and to uderstand Excellent keep it up
@larrypatterson39574 жыл бұрын
Great animations and explanations!
@kumarskandroy2863 жыл бұрын
I also had difficulty in understanding orbit and orbitals that how that is possible for electron to orbit nucleus but this man is great teacher.
@rameshbhatti88814 жыл бұрын
Good explanation 👍👍👍
@aamirshanu63292 жыл бұрын
Another Rutherford ,Bohr model hypothesis ...keep going
@APoxyR85 жыл бұрын
I finally understand the uncertainty principle. I always you couldn’t know position and velocity together. Either one or the other but I never knew why. This animation cleared this for me.