A Brief History Of Atom | Democritus to Quantum | Atomic Models

[@SandipChakrabortty-nc5zl]

You are great Klonusk . I keep watching ur video Everytime. Pls pin me

[@fundamental_laws]

@@SandipChakrabortty-nc5zl he explains fundamentaly

[@chrissmith5778]

Wholesome pin

[@hsimmortal]

The knowledge I gained from this experience far surpassed what I could have acquired through traditional classroom instruction.

[@cliftongaither6642]

yes, especially in murica.

[@devonharvey8414]

L teachers then

[@30PrinceKumar08]

​@@cliftongaither6642 Maybe because, if you're American Anything after Bohr's model is just university level chemistry

[@Rico_Gd]

The heisenberg picture swap made my day🙌🏼

[@raptorsean1464]

The first one looked like Walter White from Breaking Bad. 😅

[@bbarwik]

I am fan of channels like Veritasium and Kurzgesagt and today I've found a new amazing channel like this. Love it! I hope your number of subscribers will skyrocket soon ;)

[@Klonusk]

🙏

[@c.jishnu378]

That's a lot.

[@D_A_R_K_Sage]

Sir Thank you, For Explaining Physics in the simplest way.

[@Snow-ej5fm]

@@Klonuskbro didn’t even sa thank you ☠️

[@SumanyuShetty]

Fr

[@4pharaoh]

Not condescending and no pompous-azzery. Rare and Refreshingly well done.

[@georgesmyrnis1742]

Ancient Greek Grammar Police, KZbin Surveillance Unit here: Atomos (Άτομος) is masculine gender. Democretus would have been referring to atoms in the neutral gender as Atomon (Άτομον). The word is a compound coming from the verb “temno” (τέμνω) meaning “to cut”, in its noun form “tomé” (τομή) meaning “the cut”. The first part of the compound is the negating “a” (α). So, atomon is something that cannot be cut further (like “uncuttable”, if that’s a word). GREAT VIDEO 👍

[@dougr.2398]

We need more attention to classical scholarship

[@dougr.2398]

Few know or care that A.E. Housman was a Classical Greek and Latin scholar. Much of his poetry was strongly influenced by both his scholastic background and the losses of life in WW 1

[@tasoskotaras2738]

I just noticed your comment after I wrote mine, mentioning the same thing.

[@MusicalHarmonium]

Hey in our textbook it's given 'atomio', what does that mean?

[@georgesmyrnis1742]

@ if it’s a reference to the atom it sounds like a typo. In modern Greek the “n” at the end is dropped and “atomon” becomes “atomo”.

[@tasoskotaras2738]

I observed that the electromagnetic spectrum diagram, at 20:55, is wrong: The X-rays and Gamma-rays should be on the ultraviolet and not infrared side. The opposite holds for microwaves and radio waves.

[@fhciw]

I noticed that too. I thought for a moment I were wrong

[@laanz]

Ohh! thank you for noticing it as well, I thought I was going insane.

[@rishan_sir]

Correct, was looking for a comment regarding this

[@dwivedys]

What a brilliant presentation. I had read about Bohr’s atomic model in 1988 / 89. Orbitals, atomic number, wave particle duality, Heisenberg and such. I used to tell myself I know all these things. But in truth I knew only about their names! Your presentation brought the vague ideas I had in my head to light! Thank you!

[@deepak_nigwal]

I learned the concepts of quantum atomic models 15 years ago (when i was still in high school) and developed a good understanding and visualization of the orbitals with the probability clouds. Sadly, he ended the video exactly when it started getting interesting. I was expecting more exotic 3D orbitals of different atoms which would be a cherry on top of this amazing video already; but alas. The probability cloud orbitals are represented by him in a 2D fashion, but actually are 3D spherical shells which engulf the nucleus entirely. Similarly, other higher orbitals are more like flower petals (as in your thumbnail). The video click-bait people here with the picture, but eventually didnt deliver completely what he promised.

[@mikeottersole]

​@@deepak_nigwal If the goal is to teach, the video is very good for entry level. If we want more, it needs to build from this video. Don't be disappointed, make a better video. It's not that easy.

[@deepak_nigwal]

@@mikeottersole i responded to the clickbait.

[@markerguy]

Broo Klonuskkk.. I remember myself thinking a week or so back that it has been a long time since you had uploaded.. and now it's here.. very excited to see!..

[@gauravtak9787]

The best video I have ever seen about atoms .., you are just brilliant……brilliant…… excellent…..excellent and excellent Thanku for making this video

[@TheManzico]

This in my opinion stands as the best ever explanation of all the topics covered in here!!!

[@Vijay-bv3cp]

Went through the content in my physics and chemistry class and never understood,but this video cleared everything.If there is a thing called Feynman Technique ,you have mastered it.Thank You Sir.

[@ashirwadgarg174]

I like how easily you have explained Bohr's Model and Quantum Mechanical model. Great video sir 👏👍

[@YouzerseifYoucef]

Why does this channel have only 77k subs? You managed to explain complex physics to me despite not studying it beyond the simple atomic principles since highschool almost a decade ago, fascinating

[@schmetterling4477]

He didn't explain physics to you. He told you the simplified history of one particular area of physics. Nothing in here is physically correct. Like all science history it represents the timeline of our mistakes.

[@YouzerseifYoucef]

@@schmetterling4477 I know that, I didn't mean all of physics obviously, That would probably need hours even in a summarized form

[@schmetterling4477]

@@YouzerseifYoucef I can summarize all of physics in one word for you, if you wish: relativity. What takes five to eight years of constant learning is the unpacking of the consequences of that one word. But let me repeat this one more time: the reason why people are having such a hard time understanding physics is because we are teaching it wrong. Instead of teaching how it works, we are teaching different historical levels of how it doesn't work. That doesn't make understanding the actual mechanics of the world any easier. It makes it much harder than it has to be because we have to constantly unlearn the wrong explanations.

[@YouzerseifYoucef]

@@schmetterling4477 I see, I wish I was deep enough into the topic to truly understand what you mean

[@schmetterling4477]

@@YouzerseifYoucef Well, imagine you are learning cartography. Instead of showing you a globe and teaching you how to transfer distance and angle measurements to the sphere, the first six years they tell you that the Earth is flat and you are not allowed to deviate from that statement. That, unfortunately, is how we are teaching physics today. We start with non-relativistic classical physics. The world is neither non-relativistic nor is it classical. Neither concept gets us any further than orbital mechanics in the solar system. We can't explain chemistry with it. We can't explain light with it. We can't explain the forces between two magnets, either. Basically all the stuff we can do on the benchtop except for a few balls that are rolling down an incline comes out false with these concepts. Why in the world are we wasting six years of K-12 education on this nonsense?

[@besufekadmelaku]

This is the best video i have ever seen. You make a clear clarification about literally everything and you also motivate me to be curious about quantum physics ; thank you so much.

[@storytimeg.andfriends886]

Good video! 😄 but here are some corrections 'Anu'='Molecules' and 'Parmanu'='Atoms.'

[@atullya8173]

Thank you Klonusk, great work. These visuals helped me understand better than what was taught in class.

[@markerguy]

Klonusk an imp update, pls mention that in Bohr's Model, the electron "energy" is not just energy but it's "BINDING ENERGY" because the -13.6 there implies that this energy is negative which isn't even possible as -ve energy results in "anti-matter" and we all know that electrons are not anti-matter, so pls mention that this is the Binding Energy which is the energy required to knock this electrons off of their orbitals..

[@kapsi]

You say that energy can't be negative but binding energy, which is a type of energy can be negative, how does that make sense? And antimatter doesn't have negative energy, in the sense you write about.

[@fastlearner292]

​@@kapsi It's a quirk in how we write it that makes it easy to understand for humans. A positive binding energy indicates that a nucleus is stable and requires energy to break apart, while a negative binding energy indicates an unstable nucleus that will spontaneously decay.

[@slugface322]

Binding energy refers to the nucleus, binding protons and neutrons. i.e. the strong force. The ionization energy refers to the electromagnetic force. Oh and there's color confinement which is quantum chromodynamics.😅

[@harisayaz1238]

​​@@fastlearner292so that's why all atoms decay and have a half life ?

[@neerjawakodikar428]

At infinity the energy is zero so at any orbit the energy becomes negative. Thats for the simplest understanding. We don't know what an electron is. It can be anything.

[@stefanocucciati]

I noticed some errors: 25:33 It's Heisenberg and not Heicenberg, and the second member of the disequation is h bar / 2, not just h/2, otherwise you can wriye h/4π 26:29 it's Werner Heisenberg and not Warner

[@vaibhavthakare2076]

This KZbin video provides a depth of knowledge and understanding that rivals learning from a book.

[@AabhyaKulkarni-yp6ou]

This was such a good explanation! I really struggled with this topic and all my questions were answered in just 30 mins. Thank you

[@ShadowMonxrch]

Greatest channel to exist besides Kurgzesagt and Veritasium. You simplify everything and make it very easy to understand. I hope you make more videos.

[@pipekundayo5055]

This has to be the best I've seen in a while!

[@mardenteixeira8079]

this was the best animation of atom models I've ever seen, great job!

[@capjus]

Amazing man, i studied but never seen such good explanation, very uncomplicated

[@zacsamuel7295]

we live in an amazing time! this content is packed with information simply explained for a lay person and is totally free! thank you Klonusk!

[@ADileepkumar18]

A very nice explanation for this tough topic which I have ever seen. Keep it up..... All the best

[@AbdulRahimj27]

The narration and the responsive animation is top notch!

[@DJpiya1]

Ohh man, where have u been thus far, ur content is a pure gem. Thank u v much! 🙏🙏

[@sriramesh3985]

Hey man! I was just thinking about you yesterday. I was going to send you an email asking why you haven't uploaded anything in a few months, but then I saw your new video today! I'm so glad you're back! The video is great. It cleared up a lot of basic stuff that I was too lazy to look up myself. And the production quality is awesome. It was definitely worth the wait. Keep up the good work! நன்றிகள் பல ❤

[@Just_Another_yt_account]

Im also a tamil❤

[@sriramesh3985]

❤

[@Klonusk]

நன்றி 🙏

[@Just_Another_yt_account]

@@Klonusk are you tamil bro????😱😱

[@Sooliyakkottai_PUMS]

​@@Just_Another_yt_account vedio kadisila virumandi nu iruku

[@emenikevictor5118]

U are great teacher indeed ,you perfectly made everything clear ,thanks for that

[@Barseik]

At around 21:03, the light spectrum goes from radio to micro, then ultraviolet, then visible with the shortest on the left. This is rather misleading, as one might think radio waves are shorter than ultraviolet. Same problem as the right hand side of the spectrum, X-rays being presented as longer than infrared.

[@RodAir]

Love the pacing and level of content!!! Will be sharing with my classes!!! Thank you so much

[@Selamawsewhd-m8f]

Please send more lessons it is very fascinating to watch these videos.

[@de.monic_angel]

Best work, everything in sequence and order, great animation work,.. Klonusk your great work is really very very helpful to future scientists..👏👏

[@Harshit-yi7zr]

This channel is Underrated Good JOB kepp it up Very easy to understand

[@SumanyuShetty]

This video is literally giving me goosebumps, I feel like I am enlightened. Such a good video. Thx a lot.

[@VISHWAp.s-w8v]

A NEW EDUCATIONAL channel i subscribed after a year

[@tasoskotaras2738]

Just two little notes: 1. The word "atomos" (non divisible) is the masculine form (also feminine for this adjective class). I'm almost sure that Democritus was talking about the "atomon", i.e. the word in the neutral form (which has a more generic sense) , and in fact this is what has been propagated through the aeons. 2. Democritus did not only propose the idea of the limitation of matter's division, but the idea that the atoms had some special "hooks" that caused them to combine with one another. Thus, each form of matter is not necessarily consisted of particular kind of atoms (in which case a large amount of them would be required to explain all of the forms), but could also emerge as arbitrary combinations of them.

[@TubeMaven-_3028.]

Most underrated KZbin channel 😢

[@SubhrajitReang]

thank you very much sir , love you from INDIA

[@theoneandonlythechosenone]

Damn you are really underrated dude hope you rise to great heights for you even sky isn't the limit

[@prestamoordenador]

The best video explaining this so far :D

[@Cockateiology]

Very much good job Klonusk...! I'm really grateful to you..By this video I gained a lot of knowledge tht is rare in any Academic Book..Carry on Sir..!💌

[@mandla-nkosi]

Hey the diagram 21:02 and another one mixed the order of radio waves all the way to gamma rays, by mistakenly labelling certain radiation to be more energetic than others. I understand it is an error and your videos anyways are so good, but please have a fact checker just to make sure the tiny discrepancies aren't too obvious. Thank you.

[@fowsiyahassan1058]

This was very helpful and both well explained and animated , thanks

[@carriefu458]

Thank you for such an AWESOME science video with such cool animation! 🤓

[@jbd_edits]

I am an Indian, a student, Please continue the quantum model further, Do videos on classification of elements Chemical bonding Your helping the whole world by your videos which are excellent

[@chyldstudios]

Very high quality video! Well done!

[@AgendraSahu-ty9og]

Great explanation🎉 loved it ❤keep making videos like this....

[@yasirnawaz2030]

Wow what a great animation, work and explanation it cleared my doubts regarding atomic structure. Thank you for making such a video

[@RobinjayEbuen]

awesome editing and story telling, more on chemistry pls thank u.

[@chrisbauer6162]

Amazing video. This helped me a lot on understanding schrodingers cat and probability. I'm guessing the orbital is the reason why quantum computers tend to have a 90% reliability rate. Sometimes the orbitals mess up the computation.

[@donaldwhittaker7987]

Outstanding. Perfect for bright 6th graders. I would have enjoyed this in junior high back in the 1960s.

[@SciTrickShorts]

This is the best video i have ever seen.

[@bricesaah7818]

give this channel a nobble prize 🔆🔆🔆🔆

[@stephenwhite506]

Nice video. Perhaps do a follow up video explaining nucleon shells and nuclear isomers, thanks.

[@banditapattanaik3179]

Keep it up! I love how organized and detailed this channel is....

[@Vaigyanikjeev]

Video on thermodynamics ❤

[@AlsabithCp_220]

Most useful content to class 11 students Thank you for your effort

[@kirancs6217]

Very good and great video compiling the greatest scientific discoveries

[@kingsloin8048]

Because of you My 6 hours lecture turned Into just half hour Thanks

[@walkover1]

This video is gold. You, sir, got your self a brand new loyal subscriber🔥🚀✨

[@spiralsun1]

Send an alpha particle through the video, therefore, and few will be deflected because the video by your definition is mostly empty space. 😂

[@gamedevbysartaj]

Around 600 BC :- Maharishi Kanad of INDIA described atoms ( Parmanu ) in his book called "Vaishesika Sutra". Around 200 years before of Democritus. Maharishi Kanad was the real man who first coined the concept of atoms ( Parmanu ) in Human Kind ever. But no-one doesn't know about this much that's why I describe about this that he is the real father of Atomic Chemistry.

[@memox.c]

This channel deserve more subscribers

[@prakharindus]

It had really helps for us to understand the Chapter 2 Chemistry Atomic ⚛️ Structure Thankyou 😊

[@tivo3720]

Very nice video. To summarise the whole chapter

[@Amalanandshiva]

Great work well crafted n compiled

[@GabeTStarman]

5:10 this is a mistake, Cathodes are connected to the positive terminal and Anodes to the negative terminal. As a matter of fact, I’ve noticed some odd things about this video. It’s intending to be educational for English speaking audiences, and the visuals are generally very very good, but the script and voice work feels unnatural. It sounds like it was translated into English without receiving a proper proofread. The voice sounds like AI, or if it isn’t the voiceover needs some serious direction. In addition, the only sources listed in the description being Amazon listings for textbooks is unusual to say the least, not to mention there’s a…weird…rabbit hole connected to the listed author behind one of the pieces of text in one of the Amazon listings. If this channel seeks to be a positive and trustworthy source for English science education, I would recommend investing in rectifying these problems as soon as possible. Good luck in your endeavors.

[@UJ-nt5oo]

Keep at it, your channel will blow up like kurtzgezat.

[@engsoundleesam6292]

Thank you~~ I finally understand electronics. I respect your efforts. I hope you continue to give good lectures.

[@tava780]

Fantastic work. Easy to pick up information.

[@prabhat.nanhi.900]

You are to the point Great explanation.. Thank you

[@ashokddani]

Excellent explanation 🎉🎉

[@saqibrashid6865]

Wow it was quite good explanation. Thank you ❤

[@maheshxwar]

Thanks! very informative .

[@Sejal-up4dl]

Congratulations

[@Klonusk]

❤️

[@nword683]

@@maheshxwar get a life

[@MJ-cw6fw]

Thank you for creating this video 🐱

[@oofsper]

This video is so helpul! Thanks

[@codybass8873]

Amazing content!

[@YammyPhysics]

I like the explanation of the quantum mechanical atomic model.

[@naysay02]

Beautiful work, thank you. Question: why does an excited electron want to return to its base state? If there is space for a standing wave at that energy, why would it not just stay there as that standing wave? If the tendency is to return to lowest energy how might one explain the stable characteristics of many elements where electrons definitely occupy higher energy states (eg gold, noble gases)?

[@naysay02]

Well, upon reflection it would likely be because all the lower levels are full, which is to say all possible standing waves at that energy already exist and there isn’t space for another one.

[@bryandraughn9830]

I wonder about the neutral state as well. The tendency to find the lowest energy state seems to be a universal law in general but I don't know exactly why.

[@freedomclub866]

Hope this channel grows

[@capjus]

Im still watching.. at about half already.. AND REALLY HOPING YOU INCLUDED latest like FERENC'S FINDINGS how electrons move etc

[@Selamawsewhd-m8f]

It is great explanation please keep going on

[@OscarGonzalez-vg3cp]

Interesting is life , remember, 2 magnets coins trying to put together, and they repel, then I flip and get stack together. + and -- attractions. Body on motion, everything in is on motion. Dark matter, without it ,is not light. Love this channel, make me go deeper into my mind. Maybe I discover something..... thanks.

[@CosmophysicswithRTsir]

@klonusk can you explain how you make such videos… what kind of applications do you use.

[@deepak_nigwal]

manim

[@BjörnBöttjer]

what happened to the up and down quarks bosons neutrinos and such? will there be a part 2? and where does the energy come from that keeps electrons changing direction?

[@AhmedHan]

What about the atoms with multiple electrons?

[@muhammadnuman9t1]

Amazing Please make a video on Quantum mechanical model in details

[@madanmohandas1038]

Great video sir thank you

[@ArcZynar-HailArc]

Great video! Could you please share the name of the background music or the source?

[@fil22222]

Wow Amazingly explained

[@RayyanAhmed-h5h]

great viedo.soon you will get more subscribers

[@MaheshtataParsi]

It's really a great explination, but I think you have made an mistake in 19:29, in demonstration of wave length and energy of Em radiation gamma rays was typically from 10^-13 joules of energy shorter the wavelength higher the energy.

[@mdw2367]

Keep Going!!. A question, How do you make that animations?

[@artandcraftgirl2310]

You are the best explaner ❤

[@BlackyBrownDestruction9337]

Why are the physical properties so vastly different from one another for just a proton added? Is it because the electrons create magnetic wave patterns?

[@arunfernandez1999]

brother love you bro thanks for this video i understand a lot very useful ❤

[@priyank5161]

11:57 again, why? Why an electron do not loose energy when its in a particular Shell? My thinking leads me to the quantum model, since electron arent orbiting the atom in a classical sense, but rather as a wave of probability But bohr didn't knew it, so how can we set up a postulate like that with such certainty? Ik experiment might have verified his postulate but still

[@worldexplorer9731]

This is just wow. After watching this video i feel my whole schooling days were a waste.