Possibly the most relatable and organic series in architecture. Plus the dynamic is not something that can be easily replicated
@brnkx81773 жыл бұрын
Would suggest doing a sort of year by year breakdown of what your aspirations were at the time you were in university. Who you looked up to and how your views changed both on the architects which were influential to you and your ideologies on ARCHI. sadly they are furbies would have been much better if they were mogwis
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Interesting suggestion. Will have to have a good think about that one. Cheers
@grandmasterplank3 жыл бұрын
It's almost like you're watching my Masters course then making videos that segway perfectly with crit feedback (or thoughts I've had) to push my studies forward with. Spooky, but seriously useful. Keep it rolling.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Sorry what exactly do you mean especially relating to your course?
@grandmasterplank3 жыл бұрын
@@Archimarathon Each week your videos (almost without exception) seem to relate really closely to my Masters in terms of the advice your giving in them and the advice I need that week to progress to the next stage of a project. It's all been weirdly in sync. All really helpful stuff. Your vids are taylor-made for Masters students. I've recommended your channel to many in my year.
@barockychocky3 жыл бұрын
"segue"
@martinwander82952 жыл бұрын
Back in the 70’s, I took some classes where architectural design and language were one thing. The professor was Christopher Alexander and we used his books “The Timeless Way Of Building” and “A Pattern Language” The design process was linear. We started with big patterns like: Place the building on the south in the site. (For north facing outdoor space in the northern hemisphere) and Save the most beautiful part of the site and build in the part that needs improvement. We would continue through to the smallest details like: place each window to optimize each view. We didn’t draw until the building was completed in our minds and staked out on the site. I never designed a real building using pattern language, but it was a useful exercise both in design and presentation, as well as a great way to force us students to visualize our designs in three dimensions.
@Archimarathon2 жыл бұрын
Haha I sat in his class briefly at UC Berkeley. I was trying to participate since no one were talking or answering his questions. He told me to shut up.
@martinwander82952 жыл бұрын
@@Archimarathon HaHaHa. I expected to work with Christopher Alexander when I signed up for three months of hands on work building a Pattern Language community in Mexico. In the end, I wrote a scathing letter to him, complaining that we never saw him during my entire time on the project. I caused a minor furor back in Berkeley. The experience for me was a good one, and I’m very glad I got to live within a Mexican family, get real experience Building, and eat wonderful Mexican food. The design process was really good for me though I never directly used it in real life. Alexander was at his best as a guru, lecturing in a big auditorium while sitting cross legged and Buddha-like on a table on stage. He was absent as a professor.
@Archimarathon2 жыл бұрын
Great stories. I hope you enjoy the t-shirts. Also if you are bored and would like to chat with people around the world (lot of them are students but also some practitioners), come join our discord server
@gabybordino60243 жыл бұрын
OMG this Lego Model! I can´t think of anything else. What an important discussion you´ve had. Seen in hindsight, all your videos have a strong relationship. I couldn't help but remember "Our section on sections" because I think that a good section talks a lot about the project and needs no words. Keyword: good. It´s essential to choose the right spot on the project to do the section. And a special comment for Andrew, I´m in love with Tatoo house since it was published on Archdaily long time ago
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Thanks again for your comment and your ongoing support.
@victoriasylvestre23743 жыл бұрын
As an artist and teacher, I am very happy to hear your analysis of things. Especially fascinated by your honesty in not being impressed by great architect lecturers' words. That really hit home and is something I will carry back to my students. In non COVID times, we always spend time building with LEGO in my classroom. But now, I'm adding a new lesson extension on the quiet beauty of their instructions. Thank you for giving me lots to process and joyfully pass on.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Great to hear
@alexmastruserio95573 жыл бұрын
I have to present my masters thesis in about a month, I'll be revisiting this vid many times. Thanks boys!
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Good luck
@NixSheth233 жыл бұрын
This lesson applies beyond design school... communicating each step of your design process adds value to your firm too. Rather than prospective clients seeing the end result (aka "pretty pictures") they can see all the hard work/design thinking that went into each phase.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Yes indeed. Which is why we talked a lot about dealing with planners for example. Step by step communication.
@worldofwoodrow31923 жыл бұрын
These videos are getting me very excited to start at uni this september! Thanks guys
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Good luck!!
@Nynke_K3 жыл бұрын
Interesting and fun, as always! And interesting to see the evolution in your use of the two-camera set-up. Less of a ping pong effect than last time, but I still got distracted by Andrew looking out of the frame at the other camera, until I realized you can't have people get distracted by Star Wars *all* the time :)
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Actually the second camera was originally just there as a back up for the audio, but again the audio played up again on Andrew and also the camera angle was better in some ways because Andrew was hiding behind the Lego most of the time too. So I decided to use that second camera for some shots. It allows for easier editing cuts.
@thestrategicarchitect73143 жыл бұрын
You guys have a cool channel, very insightful !
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Be sure to check out the other videos.
@rickedwards25133 жыл бұрын
You boys teach me too much! Love the cheeky little eames chair
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@lordimpulse2 жыл бұрын
The most underrated channel.
@Archimarathon2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the love
@ghoulman513 жыл бұрын
Rubik's cubes are an example I feel. It seems intuitive to know the goal is to align each colour to a side. Even if the solving is a bit tricky/patten learning.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
This is not about being easy to use (UI/UX) but about the communication of complex ideas graphically without any words.
@timconnell41172 жыл бұрын
I would be interested to see you go through a set of your construction documentation to see how you communicate the instructions to those who are building the design. I dont see many drawing sets giving step by step construction instructions.
@wrongcreativity3 жыл бұрын
It's kind of like kids blocks and that simple puzzle of inserting a cube block through a square hole. No instructions, no guidance. Just an instinct of figuring out what fits where.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Yes the communication should feel effortless, which often requires the highest level of thinking
@xueqinyi63503 жыл бұрын
I had an assignment was to illustrate how a wiki house assembled in an IKEA style at my first year. I didn't get the point until I watched this tonight😂.
@xueqinyi63503 жыл бұрын
my lecturer showed the exact same pages you guys showed in this video, interesting.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Which pages? IKEA?
@xueqinyi63503 жыл бұрын
@@Archimarathon yeah I was thinking if he was inspired by this video hehe
@diegomarangoni49343 жыл бұрын
Tipsy Kevin at the end.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
That’s just normal
@ghoulman513 жыл бұрын
You had me at Star Wars Lego.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Yes I am so jealous of that
@hurtecho3 жыл бұрын
I never, never really liked the look of an isometric at 45° angled view...always believed that it does not enough justice to a design, it's not necessarily very aesthetic, but I understand it's often a "norm" in order to showcase whatever aspects of the design/project and it makes complete sense in some cases, of course; other angled views are so much flattering though...but my teachers would always caught that and would ask me to change the view to 45°...I never got a break on that back in the day.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
I don't care for 45 degrees but I do like the plan oblique projection
@Blubberbooi3 жыл бұрын
Yes, they are called Furbies.
@Archimarathon3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Eddie
@АнтонСтепанов-б1и3 жыл бұрын
Origami instructions are also a good example of non-verbal language