Not mentioned in this video, but using analogies to explain concepts is another useful tip - part of understanding your audience is using examples that you know they will grasp easily. Plus, analogies are just a lot of fun 🙂. Let me know which tips you found most helpful!
@vickyhsu3784 ай бұрын
Reading minds of audiences is the key to deliver the right and effective solution to them.
@williamseipp96914 ай бұрын
structure is the most helpful. If we want to communicate something to others then it's our job to identify the most important details and how to package them together so our audience 'gets it' without having their eyes glaze over.😊
@linlet5561Ай бұрын
Your content are really gold brother, thank you so much for sharing your brain of knowledge in communication 🙏
@MaryVogel-b1r4 ай бұрын
You explain things in such an easy-to-understand way.
@BrunoBridges-j4g3 ай бұрын
You explain things better than anyone else!
@matthuang213 ай бұрын
Thanks Bruno! Really appreciate it
@michaelmuniz60874 ай бұрын
I've been watching all your videos for some time now but I have to admit that this video has been crucial now that I have been preparing for job interviews!
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
Thanks Michael! Great running into you yesterday and congrats again!
@qillerr_yt4 ай бұрын
Hey Matt Love this video. Thanks for sharing your deep knowledge! I'd love to learn more about if you ever look for topics: 1. becoming more structured - How to shift from primarily bottom-up to top-down communication 2. leading meetings 3. workplace politics (probably not while you're employed in corporate ;) )
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
Love these ideas!
@annadang16104 ай бұрын
I'm curious what you think about when to use the top-down technique (key idea first - supporting ideas later) and when to use the context-based one (background first - ideas later)?
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
Hey Anna, great question. Personally, I think top down communication is most important when you're talking to somebody a lot more senior than you, but it does depend on the situation. If you know the person will have a bad reaction to the recommendation delivered without context first, then it may make sense to provide more detail / reasoning first so that they don't feel like the idea is coming out of left field.
@RaulThomas-r3n3 ай бұрын
You always manage to explain things so clearly!
@matthuang213 ай бұрын
Thanks Raul 🙏 appreciate u man
@EdnaWood-e9o2 ай бұрын
You’re so good at explaining things.
@matthuang212 ай бұрын
I appreciate that!
@jeremyjhee60244 ай бұрын
Using this for my job interviews this week. Thanks
@DulceParkes-d8o2 ай бұрын
You always explain things in a way I understand!
@matthuang212 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind comment! Glad it was helpful
@KennethTuttle-l1i3 ай бұрын
You have a fantastic way of explaining things!
@matthuang213 ай бұрын
Thanks Kenneth!
@alexmtbful3 ай бұрын
You certainly understand what you are talking about (ELI5), structured it well with 3 steps, used empathy as good as possible and did an outline in the beginning. However, you did not prime our brains in the way that you outlined a structured 3 step approach nor used "Top-Down Communication". ;) Thanks for the video 👍
@MrMcfire24 ай бұрын
Real interesting. FYI: Would be useful if you could stick to the sides of the whiteboard while you are speaking as you obviosuly have some really great content to share
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
noted!
@sebastianortizbuitrago1474 ай бұрын
Great video! Thanks
@101RealTalker4 ай бұрын
Curious what you think about the correlation between what this video represents and Jordan Peterson's communication style?
@Rahul_Prajapati-n9n4 ай бұрын
😂😂 JBP's style is like spider web connecting any useless information to any point of discussion.
@justsayin26204 ай бұрын
@@Rahul_Prajapati-n9nThat's a lackluster assessment, but okay... Jordan Peterson has gorgeous articulation, that's why it sings to the same tune as what this video is representing, because people tell Jordan "you put into words that which I always thought but could never articulate myself."
@zacharypetschko85693 ай бұрын
@@justsayin2620 🎯
@syntax26794 ай бұрын
Using this for my close intrapersonal relationships. Thanks
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@turkishdelight60324 ай бұрын
Hi Matt, do you ever feel guilty for spending much of your working day in a meeting room instead of at a regular desk? I realized that I work more productively when in a meeting space that I reserve. It’s quieter, and I feel more autonomous. Not that my manager is a micromanager who breaths down my neck, but I just feel a bit anxious around her and other people in the regular desk areas
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
I know what you mean. I prefer solo work alone because being around groups for too long is draining. There are some benefits to working around other people though (e.g., being able to turn around and ask a question, optics / perception that you’re a hard worker), so I do try to balance how much time I’m away from my desk.
@leonardcon63424 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation.
@riqoxhale4 ай бұрын
Excellent.
@TheBucketlistBoiis4 ай бұрын
Great video sir
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
thanks sir
@AB-ld1rp4 ай бұрын
interesting structuring. btw, you can get a more comprehensive explanation of the "idea first" you can watch simon sinek in 2009
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
will check that one out
@donbhai28104 ай бұрын
Keep going, great job 👍👍👍
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
thanks Don!
@RYANCHEAH4 ай бұрын
love the vid :)
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
appreciate you bro!
@lalori024 ай бұрын
your eye contact flusters me...
@matthuang214 ай бұрын
should I wear sunglasses next time?
@lalori024 ай бұрын
@matthuang21 idk, should you? But I don't think it'll help neither of us..
@vnleao2 ай бұрын
From Step 1 “A lot of us tend to overstate our own abilities” You need to go back to your own advice and know your audience. This is a tendency socialized into men. Women tend to do the exact opposite and underestimate their abilities or at least overestimate much less, especially when considering their abilities under the scrutiny of peers or superiors. Even in the famous Dunning-Kruger study you can see men overestimated themselves more than women. In your defense, you may have been taught that this mindset is universal (even out of the mouths of women) but that’s where you need to double down on taking responsibility to know your audience. Too many statistics and rhetoric in educational resource center men even if the verbiage used implies that it represents everyone. Be aware of the biases (and outright exclusion of women’s experiences in data) and take what you hear with a grain of salt. To give perspective, medicines even when made for women often aren’t tested on women, only men. Car crash tests woefully exclude dummies made to represent women, focusing on men only as drivers. Women are still profoundly excluded from consideration in generalizations about people in general. When you hear a statistic about “people,” assume first they only mean “the men we think deserve to be counted” unless proven otherwise. And even when women are included in data, be dubious about how the data actually represents them and stay critical of how it’s being interpreted in favor of looking for biases excluding the true lived experiences of women. Ok, carry on.
@samkamat29782 ай бұрын
oh brother
@vnleao2 ай бұрын
@@samkamat2978 oh no you really put me in my place, I’ll go back to being a silent woman who is fine with the incessant violence of misogynistic culture touching absolutely everything in my everyday life. Better not damage my frail womanly constitution, we all know my simple mind can’t handle the lofty ideas of MEN 😂