How to Find Noah in Our Genes . . . with Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson | Traced: Episode 13

[@tonyknittel7884]

The more I study science, biology, genetics, psychology, sociology, emotional health, philosophy, and history, among other studies, the more I feel the ancient teachings of the Bible all confirm how biblical teachings are completely accurate to teaching us how to be strong loving individuals, withstrong families, and peoples collectively. I have always just loved to learn and studied all these along with many ancient scriptures, and the more I learn the more it confirms biblical traditions of every manner. I think modern genetics don't just confirm a line from Noah, but coupled withanrcheology also the story of antedeluvian traditions. Modern academia teaches otherwise, but I am completely convinced from all my independent studies when I wasn't even looking to conform such beliefs.

[@melinaathena]

At least, I am not the only one studying all subjects and trying to correlate them back to God and the Bible. Although, it’s very hard finding someone who also has done a lot of similar research and have come to similar conclusions.

[@marcusmuse4787]

Doing the opposite of what the bible teaches is not getting us anywhere. Just take a look around.

[@erichetherington9314]

Then you're studying wrong. The bible is NARRATIVES, not fact. A man swallowed by a "big fish"? A talking serpent? Guys who survive a furnace? Please. I remain amazed that people cannot distinguish between factual writing and literary writing. Tell us, have you read any OTHER sacred texts? Just the Bible?

[@JesusSavesSouls]

⁠​⁠@@erichetherington9314A man was swallowed by a whale and survived while three days inside it, there’s a news article on it. And of course you deny the miraculous feats of God because you don’t believe in him, but really a talking snake and surviving a fire really isn’t that big of a deal for a all powerful God.. in fact it’s pretty minor. I mean he literally created trillions of stars/galaxies/nebulas light years apart at the power of his voice, he created invisible universal laws, life, the complexity of a basic cell, consciousness, the soul, the beauty of nature of animals and so on.. he’s done FAR bigger things.

[@douglindauer7327]

@@erichetherington9314 Soooo, let me get this straight. You're arguing that a book about God, the omnipotent uber-God above all "gods", doesn't tell true facts because it tells us that God does, well ... God things. You know, miracles. It's not true because it tells us that God does things that only God can do? Somehow, I'm not seeing your logic here.

[@richmondlandersenfells2238]

When I first read my bible at the age of twelve thanks to my pastor grandfather, i instantly believe that i am a descendant of Adam "the father of mankind." And i still DO after i grew interest in history and the book of genesis! I even own a book by ken ham "The Lie that is evolution" that my grandfather onced had in his possession💗

[@twilajohnson2313]

You are a child of scientific Adam. He lived in Africa, about 125,000 years ago years ago. Every man on earth carries his gene. You are also a child of Mitochondrial Eve she was also an African woman, she lived about 50,000 years from scientific/genetic Adam, every woman alive carries her gene. So we are all children of Adam literally. 🤷🏾‍♀️

[@jesuschrist3.146]

I saw Jesus dream i am from India but not hindu converted to Christianity ♾️

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

Praise God! That's so awesome to hear. I have heard the same story coming from Muslims all over the Muslim world but also in India? Amazing. God isn't concerned with borders. He can go anywhere, any time and speak to anyone. Welcome to the family of Christ!

[@robertokenneth9821]

That is amazing. Welcome friend

[@kendramalczyk2613]

Yay! Hallelujah! Thank you, Heavenly Father! It’s wonderful to hear that you heard God’s call in Christ!

[@zerosteel0123]

Congrats and welcome to the family of God!

[@jesuschrist3.146]

He is coming to judge no repentance only war ♾️

[@316bonnie1]

By the way thank you for opening up the comment portion of this presentation appreciate it

[@janaburritt6939]

Easily with you two. God is always so good ❤️

[@annamo6927]

Bought, read and loved Traced by Dr. Jeanson

[@bswihart1]

Science community "there was no flood"! Earth "are you kidding me!?"

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

Amazing content AIG! AS ALWAYS! God bless you all

[@claireusilton4066]

Go Dr. Jeanson! Go AIG! Amen! 🎉

[@zerosteel0123]

05:36 ICR did a study on mutation rates as well. It was very interesting. According to their study and mutation rates if humanity had been around for millions of years, we would have gone extinct because the mutations in our body would have gone beyond the accepted levels of tolerance.

[@SK-bw2cv]

AiG and ICR are my two favorite creationist channels. CMI is also good.

[@mikhaelsantosfernandez6377]

That couldn't be, natural selection selects beneficial mutations only, or at least the neutral ones. People with bad mutations has less offspring (or simply dies), so in general only the good ones are cumulated, which have the opposite effect of deterioration over time

[@zerosteel0123]

@@mikhaelsantosfernandez6377 Mutation rates debunk human evolution theory, Brian Thomas Mutations accumulate in everyone's cells over generations. The DNA within ourselves is accumulating errors. Copying errors from generation to generation. Every generation accumulates more copying errors and these add up over time and there is no process known to man that can correct these. The only way to correct these is to biologically engineer the correct DNA pairs and put them into the correct positions. Evolutionists say that humanity is a few million years old. Can humanity have survived that many generations and kept the modern known mutation rate? We would have experienced 120,000 generations in 2.4 million years. Geneticists have been studying the number of each new mutation from generation to generation among 78 families in trios…. grandparent, parent, child in Iceland. They discovered 63.2 new mutations for every trio and that's with the genes that they analyzed. They didn't analyze all of the DNA. There were likely more. The people who analyzed the study agreed that this would likely contribute to increased diseases. The quality of DNA is relentlessly worsening. Because deleterious mutations are more common than beneficial ones, evolution will inevitably lead to a decline in the fitness of a population. This process sets a reasonable maximal limit to the total possible number of human generations. Evolutions 120,000 generations would result in over 7 million added mutations. This greatly exceeds the human mutation tolerance.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@mikhaelsantosfernandez6377 Read that or listen to the podcast yourself, which can be found on their website.

[@zerosteel0123]

Mutation rates debunk human evolution theory, Brian Thomas Mutations accumulate in everyone's cells over generations. The DNA within ourselves is accumulating errors. Copying errors from generation to generation. Every generation accumulates more copying errors and these add up over time and there is no process known to man that can correct these. The only way to correct these is to biologically engineer the correct DNA pairs and put them into the correct positions. Evolutionists say that humanity is a few million years old. Can humanity have survived that many generations and kept the modern known mutation rate? We would have experienced 120,000 generations in 2.4 million years. Geneticists have been studying the number of each new mutation from generation to generation among 78 families in trios…. grandparent, parent, child in Iceland. They discovered 63.2 new mutations for every trio and that's with the genes that they analyzed. They didn't analyze all of the DNA. There were likely more. The people who analyzed the study agreed that this would likely contribute to increased diseases. The quality of DNA is relentlessly worsening. Because deleterious mutations are more common than beneficial ones, evolution will inevitably lead to a decline in the fitness of a population. This process sets a reasonable maximal limit to the total possible number of human generations. Evolutions 120,000 generations would result in over 7 million added mutations. This greatly exceeds the human mutation tolerance

[@sgt.grinch3299]

I missed the live session again. That is disappointing. Thank you for explaining this information. God is the only answer to the question of creation. God bless and protect your ministry, it is a valuable resource and blessing.

[@mariehunter3412]

Did you check out names in the Book of Mormon for native Indians? Many groups came across ocean surprisingly

[@nickandrei51]

Y Chromosomal Aaron is mostly haplogroup J according to the testing of the Cohanim which have this tradition of passing the oral law to each son every generation. So I think haplogroup J, I, G, and H is from Shem. And haplogroups O, R, T, ect., are from Japheth, because in Genesis it says that 'God will enlarge Japheth and he will dwell in the tents of Shem'. That first part of the verse to me shows that the only haplogroups that are enlarged, and therefore from Japheth, are haplogroups O, R, Q, ect., and haplogroup J, I, ect. is from Shem because of the discovery of the Cohanim haplogroup being mostly haplogroup J. You can't ignore that Genesis verse and have to interpret it, it's the only place that talks about Shem and Japheth and mentions something about their future.

[@maragolihistory2118]

And who is Edom?

[@jakoboka]

Remarkable how things fit together!

[@rodcarty2]

This episode was very helpful to me regarding the Y-DNA placement of Noah. I've read the book but in this episode you explained it a way that worked for me. Thanks so much!

[@monteclark1115]

He did a horrible job and none of this has been peer reviewed. I suggest doing some independent research in secular science where you will find peer reviewed studies.

[@valerieprice1745]

What is it with all the trolls in here? I think Dr. Jeanson including language families as further confirmation in addition to known history is brilliant work.

[@smokeysmith1282]

It’s easy, haters hate lol.

[@ProverbsOne7]

Oh boy. So amazing! God is great! You have- and will come up against great resistance because of what this true & proved science reveals!! I'm praying for you Dr. Nathanial Jeanson. 🤗 Stay strong and take courage! Our great all powerful God is with you!

[@mattikaronen7728]

What does this true & proved science reveal? That a lot of people are related to each other if you go back in time? Is this new knowledge? Why/how is god great?

[@ProverbsOne7]

@@mattikaronen7728 Read the Sacred Text. Study it with an open heart. There you will find all the answers to your questions.

[@drewdrake9130]

@@ProverbsOne7 Do you study the Holy texts of other religions with the same open heart that you are telling others to read the Bible with?

[@brucewayner8036]

Great work

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing these. Another one for the playlist! 🙂🙏

[@HiddenView1977]

Thank you AIG and Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson for all you do!!! God Bless!! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

01:50 so many things are pointing to a young earth. This is one of many! Thanks to you guys and others like you we can begin to see that.

[@InfoArtistJKatTheGoodInfoCafe]

Strong claims do not necessitate strong evidence. They just necessitate truth. Accurate evidence.

[@SimpleAmadeus]

Agreed, but I think he was granting the skeptics their slogan, because he can meet that unreasonable standard anyway.

[@lisashao2449]

The idea of millions of years are engrained into the society's brain so it will be difficult for people to accept a young earth idea. I trust the Bible; therefore, I trust every word in the Holy Bible. God can create every in a twinkle of an eye but he choose to create creation in order of 6 days. God bless your research.

[@ninkstheultimate3376]

And notice that we have a week system based on the seven days of creation. God did a lot of stuff that humanity has used as the basis for a lot of things

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

Completely failing education is the problem

[@ninkstheultimate3376]

@Creston Swan right, cuz you would know all about that

[@zerosteel0123]

@Creston Swan and why is that? I would certainly take the word of an omnipotent Creator over his creation. You are likely gullible enough to believe much of what is said in the news. Yet you laugh at us? I think you should reexamine your own life before going after christians.

[@yahuahoverman9585]

It’s good to trust in the (Holy) Scriptures, but it is Important to note that any KJV or derivative removes the name of Our Eternal Father and replaced His Son’s name with jesus. If you wish to understand this or prove for yourself you need to look to the original text and use certain extra biblical resources. Yahuah is Our Father’s name, and Yahusha is His son’a name .

[@danaross9785]

Wow! I feel so blessed just to hear this, thank you so much.

[@78David]

God bless you all! Pray for the lost who do know know God and are unsaved. Take all chances to plant seeds and share the gospel, help others dee the truth that this evil world trys to obscure from us all. We are all made in Gods image, even the ones we think of as wicked. Love, forgive, pray, give and be grateful every day. I love you all brothers and sisters :)

[@jamesddrake9282]

Teach truth.

[@conniesimon6305]

And all of those, including me, who love our Savior, love you also.

[@pinoydataanalyst1705]

would it be possible for Dr. Nathaniel to plot out vertical axis lines in his genealogical tree and indicate or correspond with the known historical events in that vertical axis lines?

[@allen4353]

It looks like you need a revised version of "traced" with the Noah explained in it.

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

DNA - the perfect example of God's handiwork in creation.

[@zerosteel0123]

It's truly amazing and complexed. More complexed than any supercomputer ever invented by man. A sophisticated work of art from our awesome Creator.

[@aeronblitz9347]

​​​@@frankcardano4142 "real geneticist" because he agrees with your worldview? he doesn't care about what's true, Jesus is the Truth. Did you even watch the video or are you just trying to hate? These scientists are doing science, so the issue comes to which interpretation do you view the world. Creationism makes the most sense overall, and naturalism satisfies the God-hating people who don't want GOD as an explanation because they do not want to submit to Him. Repent and believe the Gospel! "For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of GOD." (Romans 3:23) "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of GOD is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23) "But GOD demonstrates His own love towards us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8) "Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6) "For GOD so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16) "The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of GOD is at hand. Repent, and believe the Gospel." (Mark 1:15)

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

@@frankcardano4142 why don't you go watch Frank Collins, instead of wasting your time here. You don't watch the videos, so you can't criticize them. Your worldview doesn't allow you to, I suppose. You know we will be praying for you anyway.

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

@@frankcardano4142 watching AiG only to read the comments and argue. Surely there is more to life, eh Frank?

[@Jewonastick]

Only a person who's completely ignorant on what DNA is would say such a thing. It’s the sort of complicated, messy solution that evolution produces. For instance, compare DNA to some very complicated but well-thought-out computer program. The latter is clearly designed by someone. It has a logic. It doesn’t have a lot of extraneous bits. It’s understandable by anyone who learns the language it’s written in. Then look at what DNA produces. Let’s take, for example, us. We are a mess! We get all sorts of things wrong with us, from pimples to backaches to cancer. Who would design that? Heck, no rational designer would have birth be the process it is for humans. It’s as if opening a Word document would, 10% of the time, wipe out your hard drive. Evolution does explain these things. Intelligent design does not. It’s the sort of complicated, messy solution that evolution produces. For instance, compare DNA to some very complicated but well-thought-out computer program. The latter is clearly designed by someone. It has a logic. It doesn’t have a lot of extraneous bits. It’s understandable by anyone who learns the language it’s written in. Then look at what DNA produces. Let’s take, for example, us. We are a mess! We get all sorts of things wrong with us, from pimples to backaches to cancer. Who would design that? Heck, no rational designer would have birth be the process it is for humans. It’s as if opening a Word document would, 10% of the time, wipe out your hard drive. Evolution does explain these things. Intelligent design does not. It’s the sort of complicated, messy solution that evolution produces. For instance, compare DNA to some very complicated but well-thought-out computer program. The latter is clearly designed by someone. It has a logic. It doesn’t have a lot of extraneous bits. It’s understandable by anyone who learns the language it’s written in. Then look at what DNA produces. Let’s take, for example, us. We are a mess! We get all sorts of things wrong with us, from pimples to backaches to cancer. Who would design that? Heck, no rational designer would have birth be the process it is for humans. It’s as if opening a Word document would, 10% of the time, wipe out your hard drive. Evolution does explain these things. Intelligent design does not. For instance, compare DNA to some very complicated but well-thought-out computer program. The latter is clearly designed by someone. It has a logic. It doesn’t have a lot of extraneous bits. It’s understandable by anyone who learns the language it’s written in. Then look at what DNA produces. Let’s take, for example, us. We are a mess! We get all sorts of things wrong with us, from pimples to backaches to cancer. Who would design that? Heck, no rational designer would have birth be the process it is for humans. It’s as if opening a Word document would, 10% of the time, wipe out your hard drive.

[@davidmcintosh3468]

are you using the genealogy and timescale from the masorete or septuagint script? This was absolutely fascinating! God bless you all!

[@maxpeck1962]

Is there any difference between the 2 for the early portion of the tree (down to Peleg for example) shown in the book and this video? I thought the only divergence was regarding length of time spent in Egypt which is long after Abraham anyway.

[@watchman2866]

Could Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson do a specific study and breakdown on Dr. S. Joshua Swamidass.s arguments and book? There's too much to read.

[@dukekelloway5328]

The writer of this book certainly exhibits Noah's DNA in that it seems to be coming from a place of great inbreeding.

[@cjhadley82]

I did the 23andMe DNA test. Can I use the paternal haplogroup from it to find my haplogroup in the book? Why I’m asking is it says my haplogroup is R-Z367 and I’m not sure how to find it in the book from color plate 235.

[@mohamedmuse08]

You don’t need to be jewish, christian, Muslim or even other religion believer to agree with the compelling evedince of the book Traced, I definitely agree with Dr. Nathaniel T Jeanson’s amazing work.

[@davidmugg5150]

Have you considered the potential disruption to "accepted" population models that would have happened with the ages of the generations following Noah? If you graph these out, a demographic collapse seems to correspond roughly to the timeline of the Dorian Dark Age (for which scholars have no explanation.)

[@iveseen1]

Have you considered the genetic consequences of Noah's family inbreeding and effect on subsequent progeny?If defective genes are an issue in evolution, then this would be a classic. Noah's family is not enough to sustain a viable population. 5o is considered a minimum.

[@jimcricket1]

@@iveseen1their dna is still close to Adam's. Shem's grandson Abram married his sister Sarah who was so beautiful at 80 that Abram told kings that she was his sister out of fear of being killed because kings wanted her. Ham's grandson Nimrod also married his sister, I think she's called innana or ishtar the perpetual virgin on the Sumerian stones, Easter or dianna of the Romans, today worshipped by the Roman catholics as Mary. Ancient history aligns perfectly with biblical history especially if you also read the books of jasher and enoch.

[@anonymouse867]

This gives me something to think about. The remains of King Tut are said to have the markers for Marfan's Syndrome, a clubbed foot, a cleft palate and fusions of his upper vertebrae. Inbreeding was a known practice of Egyptian kinda and queens. It is believed that he married to his sister and many fetuses were found in the tomb that were believed to be miscarriages. I understand that God dealt with Egypt quite differently than Israel, other than that what would explain their rapid genetic decline as opposed to the general genetic decline of other races?

[@TickedOffPriest]

There is more in those names than anyone could imagine.

[@samueldye2772]

My son and I completed Family Tree DNA Big Y-700 test about 2 years ago. We had two mutations between my son and I. We are I-FTA95282 haplogroup which is claimed to have bottlenecked back in 2600 B.C. in Sweden. Are there mutations in all generations?

[@bigred8438]

How does the Y chromosome mutation rate compare to the background mutation rate of the X chromosomes and that of the somatic cells within the same period?

[@twilajohnson2313]

Serious question. I have been studying my history lately, especially the ancient part of my history. I have run up on several ancient Arabic scholars and their consensus is that the ancient Jewish people were of African origins. Is that what you’re looking for in your DNA?

[@kittyhume3917]

this is so good!

[@petermehl1384]

Consider Tarshish in the British Isles....... it seems to match Biblical passages, both past and modern in a better fashion.....

[@BDReal-time]

Happy Thanksgiving from Canada

[@TheJohnMak]

How can you identify Noah’s DNA???

[@Jewonastick]

The same way as you'd identify Santa Claus his DNA.....

[@davidm4566]

@@Jewonastick I mean St. Nicolaus was a real person who lives in the past, so I guess you're right.

[@Jewonastick]

@@davidm4566 You gotta have some serious mental health issues if you genuinely think that Noah's Ark fable is real

[@TimeLordTurtle1]

YES IM IN EVERYONE

[@rollysj384]

I couldn't finish the video.. but why only Noah? If you can do that far, why not all the way to Adam?

[@TAME906]

Because Noah is the genetic bottle neck.

[@keithalderson100]

Only Noah and his male prodigy survived... technically he became the origin of all humans.

[@marvet9573]

@Creston Swan if you're going to going to make such claims at least have something to support it lol there's literally people who dedicate their entire lives to ensure the efficacy of claims like Noah being the genetic bottle neck which includes many oral traditions and historical accounts deep rooted in cultures around the world that corroborate the account of Noah and the flood.

[@davidm4566]

@Creston Swan watch the video bro. It seems pretty convincing.

[@davidm4566]

@Creston Swan Then don't let me convince you of anything. Also don't let them convince you that a cell could spontaneously pop out of chemicals and somehow have the genetic information to move, eat, metabolize and store the energy (using the correct enzymes that also formed at the same time), grow, and reproduce...all on the first try. Look it all up for yourself. Draw your own conclusions about everything. Don't trade one person telling you that this is the way things are for another who was just telling you what they were taught and they also don't know. Find the truth for yourself.

[@Crusherwoman]

I’m so confused. What about all the people that came before Noah? How do they fit into this picture?

[@OQUINN83]

My 23 in me DNA test results has a small grayish section that is not assigned

[@highplains7777]

My brother was told he was part Native American. I took my test a few years after he did and it gave me an "unassigned" section like you. Luckily, I know my family tree back to the Delaware woman who is my ancestor and I assume that grey section is from her.

[@hosannayeshua4446]

@answersingenesis Notice in your genetic map at and after 12:45, finland is not amongst the genetic group of other europeans. I know from other sources that the finnish y-chromosome makeup isn't like the rest of europe has. Is there any data on the origins of finnish people? Would be interested as a finn myself to know more about this, we just know linguistically that we originated maybe somewhere in the regions of ural mountains or more south towards the region of russia between ukraine and kazakhstan. But some genetic history would be interesting to see.

[@DanielAguilar777]

Wish Nathaniel would say his prediction date of when is Noah

[@freemind..]

If you are referring to the date of the Flood, springtime of 2345 BC seems to be the most likely. Though Genesis declares that the Flood began on the 17th day of the 2nd month, we can't say that February 17 was the true start date because the written historical account, recorded long before the evolution of our present-day Gregorian calendar, is based on the Jewish Lunisolar Calendar used by the Hebrew people. The first month of this calendar begins near the end of the Gregorian month of March or the beginning of April, making the second month mentioned in Genesis 7:11 the end of April or the beginning of May on our modern calendar.

[@davidm4566]

@@freemind.. that's interesting but wasn't Abraham about 5,000 years ago?

[@freemind..]

@@davidm4566 - Abraham?

[@davidm4566]

@@freemind.. Yes, I heard that Abraham lived 5,000 years ago. I might be wrong. If it's true, then that would be older than what you said for when the Flood happened.

[@freemind..]

@@davidm4566 - That is incorrect. Not quite 4400 years have passed since the Flood. Abram (later Abraham) was born 10 generations after Noah from the line of Seth. This was long after the Tower of Babel and the separating of the continents. Egyptian and Chinese civilizations had been established for several hundreds of years.

[@peggyvorse1461]

When God chose Israel and the line of David to lead to Christ, with the line of the Gentiles being different. And when they didn’t accept Christ we are grafted in, when we except Christ. Because from the time of Noah we all come from the same line that Adam and Eve.

[@watchman2866]

When the evolutionary model claims to make predictions, how are they confirmed as successes or failures? And what are the ratios between them?

[@maxpeck1962]

Archaeopteryx was just a bird. It's status as a transitional form from dinosaurs is greatly exaggerated. As is often the case, it's a worldview issue; you see what you want to see based on your presuppositions.

[@maxpeck1962]

Yes, birds are now "dinosaurs", men are now "women" and vice versa, stasis is now "evolution"... words don't have as much meaning as they used to.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@frankcardano4142 even non-Christian scientists have said Archaeopteryx is not a dinosaur. You should get your facts together. They bounce back and forth on the idea. They don't even know for certain. If they don't know for certain you most certainly do not either.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@globalcoupledances Royal Society Publishing details a study by Michael S. Y. Lee and Trevor H. Worthy reporting that Archaeopteryx was simply a bird. "The widespread view that Archaeopteryx was a primitive (basal) bird has been recently challenged by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis that placed Archaeopteryx with deinonychosaurian theropods. The new phylogeny suggested that typical bird flight (powered by the front limbs only) either evolved at least twice, or was lost/modified in some deinonychosaurs. However, this parsimony-based result was acknowledged to be weakly supported. Maximum-likelihood and related Bayesian methods applied to the same dataset yield a different and more orthodox result: Archaeopteryx is restored as a basal bird with bootstrap frequency of 73 per cent and posterior probability of 1."

[@zerosteel0123]

@@globalcoupledances The latest research, published in Nature Communications, appears to settle the issue once and for all by studying the geometry of the wing bones from three specimens of Archaeopteryx. The authors, who hail from several universities across Europe, conclude, Our analyses reveal that the architecture of Archaeopteryx’s wing bones consistently exhibits a combination of cross-sectional geometric properties uniquely shared with volant birds, particularly those occasionally utilising short-distance flapping. In effect, Archaeopteryx appears to have flown by flapping its wings in short bursts. Lead researcher, Dennis Voeten of the European Synchrotron facility in France said, “We imagine something like pheasants and quails. If they have to fly to evade a predator they will make a very quick ascent, typically followed by a very short horizontal flight and then they will make a running escape afterwards.”

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

Where did they find Noah's DNA?

[@872lu5]

E1B1A is the oldest haplogroup but you have it connected to Ham which is the youngest son of Noah…? Make it make sense

[@degree1091]

The deeper you dig, the more melanated it gets....Get over it. All other race classifications branched from the indigenous peoples.... they might be referred to African or Black peoples in a modern context.

[@872lu5]

@@degree1091we’re on the same side, I’m agreeing with you. I’m just stating that E1B1A shouldn’t be Hamatic.

[@peacetrain5623]

If i not mistaken when read his books oldest means the longest mutation gave from father to son, means that ham and noah mutation is longest compare to noah to other 2 sons.

[@jesuschrist3.146]

I think i am the last one becoz i converted 2 santhal to Jesus the tribal in jharkhand ♾️

[@7h3F33d3r]

-I have no problem with watching them twice to pick up information I missed in the first go-round. My complaint is with the extreme damping of the highs and lows. The audio sounds like I'm in a box of cotton listening to someone who's verbal frequencies are narrowly tailored to barely push through the cotton in the box I'm in. It is SO distracting that I have no inclination to re-watch (listen) a second time. I'm trying to learn...why is the audio engineer so insistent on cutting frequencies down to a band which is narrow and difficult to listen to?

[@7h3F33d3r]

I am a Cristian and believe the information provided here. KZbin comments decided to delete anything before an Em dash. Maybe it's smarter than me because my comment stands. It is not normal to hear voices through severe high and low filters. It is very distracting.

[@kurtdejgaard]

Models are so forgiving. Current "secular" population genetics focussed on the Y-chromosome, suggest a timeline that isn't Biblical, but have us descend from 4 males, roughly 50,000 years ago (with "bottle-neck events both before and after). So what does it take to change the 50,000 year timeline to one of 4,500 years? Initially you need "only" to tweak the mutation rate in your model. And as you already can predict what mutation rate you'll need to model a beginning at 4,500 years ago, the hunt is on. Nathaniel Jeanson finally finds his dataset and there's much rejoice at Answers in Genesis. We have used science to disprove science - "our data are as valid as that of the secular sciences". And at face value, that is correct if only temporarily: You have two data points - a mutation rate and a beginning date for diversification and yo draw ("model") a line and yipee! It fits. If only, cause it doesn't end there. You can (and should!) test your model with additional data, this time from archeological DNA samples, to validate your mutation rates and branching of populations into genetic haplotypes. And there, the model fails. "Something must be wrong with the sequence quality, so I left them out" Nathaniel Jeason explains. But no, that's the wrong answer: The correct answer is that the archeological data shows your tweaked model is wrong. It has been falsified by the archaeological DNA sequences. The dots that should lie on the interpolated line of the tweaked model, doesn't fit. The model is wrong. And there's where the science ends for Answers in Genesis: Because Answers in Genesis only pays lip service to a secular scientific process, when it can be coaxed into agreeing with them. Answers in Genesis aren't looking for answers to questions. They already have the answers and those answers must not be questioned! So whenever scientific data does't support their 4,500 timeline since a Great Flood genetic bottle-neck, both data, science and scientific process is dismissed, wholesale! The difference between "real" secular science and the pseudoscience that Answers in Genesis here propagate is this: Science may create models and make predictions, based on data at hand. IF new data to test the model, doesn't fit the model, science learns from that. It is how secular science progresses! Science tries if modifications to the model will accommodate the new data - or whether an entirely new model is needed to explain the expanded dataset. The approach of Nathaniel Jeanson and Answers in Genesis is that if additional data doesn't fit the desired model (the only one allowed) then the data must be dismissed! But that is "faking it" - the very thing Answers in Genesis and Young Earth Creationists (unjustifiably) accuse the secular sciences of propagating. In above video, they openly admit it. And maybe they should just stop, there. And it is, of course, just the tip of the ice berg: Y-chromosome is one thing to study. Another is mitochondrial DNA. It is as useful in the studies of ancestry as is the Y-chromosome: the Y-chromosome cannot recombine and is inherited from father to son, altered only by mutations. Mitochondrial DNA is likewise inherited from our mothers, altered only by mutations. And looking at mitochondrial DNA shows that the genetic "Eve" - the common maternal ancestor - lies >100,000 years back. Further down the ice berg of problems: The genetic diversity of most mammals is substantially higher than that of humans. And this is of course a problem for Young Earth Creationists, as all living animals must descend from forefathers that all arose from the same genetic bottle-neck that Noah's Ark represents and it must have happened 4,500 years ago. So "we don't talk about that" at Answers in Genesis and among Young Earth Creationists. Why? Because, as I stated above - both only pays lip-service to scientific reasoning: They have answers that must not be questioned, rather than questions in search of answers. And that makes their approach not only non-scientific - it makes their approach anti-scientific! They try to fake an imitated scientific approach to use its resulting pseudo-science as a weapon in their war ON science.

[@karlsmit2873]

** "QUESTION" - ??? WHY do Answers In Genesis say Shem died after Abraham is born. Is this a typo or is this wrong on your side. Please advise ???

[@donnar9864]

I'm at the 8 the minute and I'm just lost in this conversation...

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

@@frankcardano4142 Frank, Frank. Still going on?

[@DrJoelDuff]

Your not the only one. Wee are all confused when he talks about his predictions of population growth. I have yet to meet another person that has read his book that can explain what he is talking about here.

[@maxpeck1962]

Ignore Frank, he's just trolling here. As for the 8 minute mark, he is still summarizing previous content. Specifically supporting the conclusion that Neanderthal DNA is not reliable for using in these studies, which was the focus of the previous video in the series.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@DrJoelDuff I've heard plenty of people talking about the rates of population growth. Not that hard to understand.

[@maxpeck1962]

Search for the article "When Evolutionists Help Creationists Make Their Case." That sums up Joel Duff's credibility.

[@johngurvan8279]

If it fits in with your belief no matter how wrong you will believe it.

[@kern77]

Is it possible for a person to lose his doctoral degree? Why would you except what a person wrote down.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

Not mentioned is the fact the Y-chromosome is much older than humans. All therian mammals use the Y-chromosome for sex determination, which suggests a common ancestor. Even if the Y-chromosome in human history is as Dr. Jeanson says (it isn't), that doesn't explain it in terms of all the other animals that also have the Y-chromosome.

[@larrybarnett5799]

R1b does anyone know this haplogroup?

[@bite-sizedshorts9635]

It spread into central Asia and then some spread westward into Europe. So a large percentage of European men can trace their Y-DNA all the way back to Shem.

[@amyrae1087]

I wonder...if this info replaces mainstream scientific belief and teaching, how long would it take to remove evolution teaching from school systems and informational systems globally? Thank you Dr. J. for your diligence in bringing these truths to the world. This is missionary work in MANY respects!

[@Jewonastick]

It won't replace evolution as evolution is the most well substantiated scientific theory there is.....

[@davidm4566]

I don't know that it would be accepted. Scientific community tends to plug their ears, close their eyes, and ignore what doesn't fit their wordview. Or they make up things to try and make it work like how the oort cloud was made up without any evidence to explain why comets can't exist for millions of years.

[@Jewonastick]

@@davidm4566 the fuqing irony!

[@freemind..]

@@Jewonastick - No. Evolution is one in a disturbingly long line of pseudotheories being taught as fact. Despite the hubris, modern science is wrong right down to the foundational underpinnings upon which much of the natural sciences are based. Evolution is its own religion and requires more faith than most. Wide acceptance of a lie does not change it into truth.

[@Jewonastick]

@@freemind.. again; the fuqing irony.

[@jesuschrist3.146]

Take mine too ♾️

[@k.m.125]

You should listen to Shepherds Chapel on KZbin Nathan Jeansen and see if their Bible teaching helps.

[@Holidays411]

can you generalize on your conclusion for us?! we are not after the mothod here, just the overall conclusions

[@dove5591]

The dominant DNA in Greece is Turkish J2 haplogroup 😏

[@oliverduke1173]

many raep during the occupation.

[@dove5591]

@@oliverduke1173 what?

[@dove5591]

@@oliverduke1173 There is no occupation greece never existed as a country in the past nor it has anything to do with greeks 🤣

[@carmentorrens6528]

Do you know the theory of the bottle neck? Is about the DNA of the Noa's family.

[@donia20252]

Yes hands up as Maronite Catholic. They discovered our genetic is Y- goes all the way to Noah the ark

[@bigred8438]

Perhaps the use of the Y chromosome data to support your contention that humans are recent (rather than evolutionary), and not of this Earth as it were, is questionable because those people today with admixture from other hominids received it from the matrilineal line. Testing the Y chromosome of those men with neanderthal and denisovan genetic admixture from the female line will not show the admixture from other hominids either.

[@ekcoylejr]

So. Noah goes back to 12,900years?

[@whyaskwhybuddry]

@Answers In Genesis, it is an Archeological Fact that the Sphynx in Cairo has erosion damage from Noah's Global Flood.

[@mattikaronen7728]

🤣😂 That is truly funny since Noah’s flood are supposed to destroy everything man made, and also egyptians are descendents from Noah’s son… Contradiction after contradiction.

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

The flood is at no point said to destroy everything manmade. It destroyed all flesh. The sphynx and the pyramids may be ante- pr postdeluvian, but is there any proof the people who live around them are descended from the people who built them? You search too hard for trouble. The answers are ultimately simple and coherent.

[@whyaskwhybuddry]

@@mattikaronen7728 Where in the Bible do you read that the Flood was to "Destroy Everything Man Made? Only Living things were destroyed. The Sphynx, the ruins of Gobe Tepe, The Pyramids of Antarctica and Pumupunku in South America weren't "Wiped off the face of the Earth". Man made objects like chlorine infused iron hammers, iron pots, gold jewelry and brass bells dedicated to Baal have been found in Coal Ore and other rocks supposedly "400 million years old". Awkward!

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

Yet Egyptians make no mention of any mythical flood

[@reuelray]

How could the Egyptian Sphynx be destroyed by the flood when they were constructed after the flood? The Egyptians are descendants of Noah through his son Ham. Don't any of you people read? It's plainly in the Bible in the book of Genesis. A commenter on this page named Matti already mentioned this and no one hardly paid attention. 🤔

[@secondexodus9105]

He’s wrong, he’s not focused on culture of the people that are associated with haplogroups. Natufians had a Semitic culture and had haplogroup E. Secondly, he doesn’t explain how haplogroup CT can give rise to CF and DE. How can CT give rise to both Shem and Japheth lineages?!. Haplogroup R is a descendant of haplogroup F so is haplogroup J and T so how is that possible if Ham Shem and Japheth produced their own lineages?

[@2feathers409]

Ron Wyatt's (that was noted for his work in discovering Noah's ark) wife has what they believe to be the finger bone of Noah's wife.

[@12svaner]

I lived 30 kilometres inland from the Sea and 45.1 metres above sea level and there are sea shells on the RIVER bank's

[@ladarriusdotsonrepentandpr798]

You tried to tie it in biblically but you’re just off. You have done a great job with the genetic tree for the most part except adding the biblical designations to the Haplogroups. You have many people groups mixed up and contradict what you did tying together the lineages last video

[@captwescrusher]

that explains why i can't swim or can't build a boat

[@dylanharper1274]

So why did Noah get drunk and expose himself to his son?

[@iveseen1]

What's wrong with that,its not as bad as Lotts daughters getting dad drunk and having sex with him ,so that his "line " continues .Looks like god let more sinners escape Soddom.

[@davidm4566]

Sin. He was still imperfect. People today have tons of "I was so drunk that I did..." stories. That was his.

[@RaAvim]

PTSD - How would you feel if everything and everyone you knew (other than wife and children) were gone? What if keeping all human knowledge, technology, and history was completely based on your knowledge and memory? It would be very overwhelming to start over from nothing.

[@dylanharper1274]

@@RaAvim And you're 600 years old because zero hadn't been invented yet!

[@whyaskwhybuddry]

@Answers In Genesis, why not just excavate Noah's Grave at the below coordinates and extract his Y DNA? He's buried at: Noah's Homestead 39°37'56.27"N 43°59'3.96"E

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

I'm not sure the location of Noah's grave is known. That one guy in the 80s kept trying to find the Ark, but a grave would deteriorate even faster, since there is s much less matter for decomposers to work on. There is no mention of Noah's grave in Scripture. For all we know, he may have told his sons to build another boat and go out to bury him at sea. No idea; God doesn't tell us.

[@whyaskwhybuddry]

@@joshuakarr-BibleMan The graves of Noah and his wife are on their Eastern Turkey Farm at the following GPS coordinates. Noah's Homestead 39°37'56.27"N 43°59'3.96"E His marker is still standing, hers fell down but both have a carving of a boat on waves with 8 people getting off. She died first because her eyes are crossed out while his open. Ron Wyatt in the 70s and 80s took video of both their stone built house and their tombstones. Mr Wyatt would lead tours to Turkey and show people the Noahs Homestead, the Multi-Ton Drouge Stones or "Sea Anchors" which are all in line from the town of Arzep to the Durpinar Site which the Turkish Government declared to be Noah's Ark. They dedicated Noah's Ark National Park on 20 Jun 1987. ABC's program 20/20 with Barbara Walters covered the story in 1986 where Ron, Dave Fassold and Dr John Baumgartner did ground penetrating Radar scans and marked out the Returns with tape. You can see the Regular pattern of iron rivets, bulkheads and 90 degree angles not found in Nature. After his first guided tour of the Homestead in 1979, local Kurds knocked down the house because they don't like outsiders. After a subsequent tour, grave robbers dug up Mrs. Noah's 18 foot stone sarcophagus, robbed it of the heavy gold bodice, head piece and other jewelry and sold them on the Black Market. Her skeleton and stone sarcophagus is in an non descript Ankara museum under lock and key. Ron's Wife Mary describes how Interpol went to her husband in the 80s and asked if he knew who robbed Mrs. Noah's grave. He didn't know. Noah's Family was at least 16 feet tall. Mrs. Wyatt still has the pinky bones from Mrs. Noah's left hand that robbers left behind. She showed those bones to a Radiologist and two doctors who confirmed they are Human. Mrs. Wyatt was interviewed by an Asian Reporter and she brought out those bones. That video is here on KZbin so you can watch her description yourself.

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

@whyaskwhybuddry If Noah and his family were giants, then they are from the haplogroups of the sons of God, who took the daughters of men as wives and sired the Nephilim giants. If Noah and his sons are descended from demons, then they are not sons of Adam. If Noah's family are not sons of Adam, then none of us are. Noah's genaeology shows his direct descent from Adam, which makes us all human and not nephilim, which means they were regular height, which means at least part of your tale contradicts Scripture, which means it is incorrect. If a man is dishonest in a little, then he is dishonest in a lot. I didn't know what to make of that guy who said he found Noah's Ark, but if he calls them giants, then I have no question what his aspirations are.

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

@whyaskwhybuddry I thought about this later on and realized the existence of the nephilim in Canaan means at least one of those eight survivors must have come from them, in order to pass the genes on. It just can't be on the y chromosome.

[@whyaskwhybuddry]

@@joshuakarr-BibleMan Nephilim are Pre-Flood. Go reread the Noah's Family Tree. As for "Tall" people, Noah and his Family were ALL at least 16 feet tall. The Canaanites are indeed descendants of Noah's son Ham. Before the Flood EVERYTHING got bigger and lived longer because the Environment was different. The Magnetic Field was stronger which blocked most of the harmful UV rays. UV Rays cause DNA to deteriorate. Oxygen made up at least 30% of be air and was as at a pressure much higher than the 14 psi we have today. Scientists have sampled air pockets inside Amber and were shocked when they discovered this. There are fossils of Dragonflies with 50 inch wingspan. An insect that Big today couldn't get off the ground. Dinosaurs like T-Rex, grew Sauropods huge, but they had nostrils the size of a Modern horse. They needed the Earth's Hyperbaric Atmosphere in order to survive. It was Noah's Flood with its Catestropic Plate Tectonics that destroyed Earth, the Protective Barrier in Space and created all the fossils we find. It was the Catestropic change in the Environment which caused Animals/insects and Humans to stop living so long, and growing so tall.

[@ghettotech9617]

those evoloution guys and gals are going to be trembling in there boot when judgement day comes

[@davidblick2192]

Read the Bible.

[@316bonnie1]

3:45 ITS NEW, YORK NEW YORK Y'ALL

[@zoshida]

is that more important than the sacrifice of God?

[@jarvis8708]

Just got a dna test done and my family history goes back to thanos super cool

[@rickadam2956]

There are 9 planets though and the 7 others farther away from the son, also have pyramids and signs of previous inhabitants. the cycle of 12068 years between Novae and the creation of new planets. This suggests that your timeline doesn't account for the fact that each nova pushes the planets further away. As Mercury cools, life will evolve there too. Expand your thinking as there are many other factors at play.

[@nikhwalee4252]

In fact, modern human populations on Earth are part of the big human phylogenetic tree if track with both X and Y chromosome lineages. All of us decended from the first man and woman. One human race on Earth.

[@bigred8438]

If Noah, why not Ham....who would like to find the DNA of Ham in his Y chromosome?

[@spiritualjoy721]

So, he could not find Noah on the tree.

[@SimpleAmadeus]

Perhaps you missed the last quarter of the video. 26:16 Names of Noah's offspring matching names of the people-groups. 27:00 Missing details of Noah's offspring matching the numbers that moved to distant regions, where their details would not be recorded in Jewish history. 28:59 Numbers of Noah's offspring matching numbers of people-groups.

[@spiritualjoy721]

@@SimpleAmadeus I actually watched the video to the end. But I will watch it in its entirety a second time and pay more attention to the segments you mention.

[@SimpleAmadeus]

@@spiritualjoy721 Okeydokey.

[@stargategoku]

Where isnthe genes of Asian came from? I did not see Asian in the list like Chinese and South East Asian

[@ulyrhee8123]

According to his graph asians being y haplogroup O are descendents of joktan who is a shemite. Also some asians such as japanese, mongolians,australians, new guineans, melanesians have relatively high percentage y haplogroup CandD making them descendants of Ham also(from other videos). If you look carefully at his biblical genealogical graph and y haplogroup graph placed side by side you will see C And D placed with african line.

[@alphabeta1337]

Y Chromosome Adam is Noah

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

Well no, Noah is Noah and Adam is Adam. Noah is the bottleneck though, because all Adamic haplogroups and demonic haplogroups at the time were wiped out, except his.

[@yahuahoverman9585]

@Creston Swan was Alexander the Great a real person?

[@yahuahoverman9585]

@Deston Swan was Abraham, Father of Isaac, Father of Israel a real person?

[@yahuahoverman9585]

@Deston Swan was King David a real person?

[@yahuahoverman9585]

@Deston Swan 🤷🏽‍♂️you have been entertaining me thus far, I thought you were having fun. My point is that I’m trying to discern your standard or basis when it comes to the historical veracity of people(s).

[@chattcedric6321]

Guys I'm sorry for not watching the whole video. Because from the title itself I surmised that it's all self interpretations and understanding and not EXEGETICAL or HERMENEUTICAL STUDIES. Because Genesis Chapters 1 to 11 (From Adam to Noah) are under the Literary Genre of "Myths and Legends". Meaning, it did not exist and/or happen literally. So where and what DNA are you talking about. DNA doesn't come from nothing or non-existent.

[@bite-sizedshorts9635]

Watch the video, or don't say a word. Especially go back to #1 in the series and watch all of the videos. Perhaps even buy the book "Traced" and read it. In addition, read Lee Strobel's books on God and the Bible. Read about Y-DNA and haplogroups online. BTW, the Bible has been misclassified to suppress the truth. Chapter 10, the "table of nations" chapter, has been proven (by a former atheist) to be 99% accurate up to the time of his article publication. Every name in the chapter corresponds to real places and real peoples in their actual relationships.

[@dennisgoyette3944]

We all know they change their standards to continually support their flawed views.

[@yahuahoverman9585]

Hello are you familiar with the many changes the The (Holy) Scriptures, the most obvious which many recognize is translation( in its own right is benign, however often times some meaning is lost derivative from Hebrew culture/thought), most of the time this is not a problem. The big problems come when groups or individuals not led by the Holy Spirit( Ruahh Ha Kodesh, in Hebrew) ,but by the wicked one make, replacements, add, and subtract from The Scriptures. One of the most recent changes to not just scripture but many languages is the creation of the letter J( please research this yourself) . Don’t stop reading your Bible, but start looking into the many changes made, starting from recent to deep in history. May the Peace of Yahuah that is in Yahusha Hamashiach abide in you alway, Amen. ❤️ It’s good to trust in the (Holy) Scriptures, but it is Important to note that any KJV or derivative removes the name of Our Eternal Father and replaced His Son’s name with jesus. If you wish to understand this or prove for yourself you need to look to the original text and use certain extra biblical resources. Yahuah is Our Father’s name, and Yahusha is His son’a name .

[@garyseven4896]

Let God be true and every man a liar. Thanks for documenting God's truth.

[@Yaakovseed]

Sounds good but incorrect! Europeans are Shemites? Pirkei Rabbi de Eliezer describes Shem as black and beautiful, Ham as black as a raven, and Japheth as white as snow (white representing lack). I would like for you to explain where white skinned people originated? In the Quran it states that God formed Adam out of black mud! When did white skinned people come on the evolutionary scene?

[@narnia1233]

I’m not sure where you’re getting that Europeans are from Shem. I bought his book and basically Europeans he classified as from I. And the I group he classifies as from Japheth. You should get his book. It actually agrees exactly with what you said. Doesn’t hurt to look into new research.

[@narnia1233]

In particular, Javan, one of the sons of Japheth, he lists as likely tied to Greece.

[@narnia1233]

I don’t think they focus too much on white Europeans in the video because they’re more interested in identifying the people mentioned in the Bible. But, yes, he does have white Europeans as descendants of Japheth.

[@Yaakovseed]

@@narnia1233 I responding to a previous lecture. He states that Europeans are from Shem. In fact, the older gentleman who was interviewing him thought that his Y chromosome would align with Japheth and Dr. Jeanson said “no”…you are from Shem! If I misinterpreted his information…I stand corrected🙏🏾

[@narnia1233]

@@Yaakovseed It is confusing. I’m starting to read the book-on page 89, but I looked at the charts he provides and it clearly says on the charts what I stated prior. But, basically the gist overall is that there’s some connections between people groups and apparently that shows up too in Y Chromosome DNA. He mentions the R1b group and such which are from Shem because apparently they did move West into Europe as a result of Ottoman expansion or something. But, basically it goes the following: Shem is mostly Asia. Japheth is European area-though also some Middle Eastern possibly. Ham is mostly Africa. But, it’s not really as straightforward as that. Basically people flee conflicts and intermarry and such. So there’s even things we wouldn’t necessarily expect like a connection from Africa to Japan, etc. But it seems overall to match up with known conflicts and migrations of people. And languages too, where they were known to exist and when too. Stuff like that.

[@tonycarreira3793]

truth

[@donnafletcher5386]

You're just revealing what has already been known about the existence of the earth and humankind that God ordained into being. It's just those that fell/or ignore the Truth over time try to create something else to satisfy their need to understand why they exists. There's an strong desire as humans to feel we belong. So when people won't accept God as their Creator and follow His narrow path so they make up a story to feel a connection.

[@AutoEngineerVideos]

If I heard correctly, aDNA is ignored because it would result in more genetic diversity early in human history than Dr Jeanson's theory can explain. If my hearing is correct then his rejection of evidence is just as damning for his theory as the evolutionists' rejection of evidence against theirs. Yes, I understand that there are considerable limitations to aDNA sample collection and processing, and there's also the chance of contamination. However, having listened to a lecture by an expert in the process, I get the impression that they're well aware of the difficulties, and they're actually quite competent at not contaminating samples, and their methods of determining where to splice the sequence together seem quite reasonable too. I realise that a lot of work has been put into the research that has gone into Traced, but ultimately, it's too simplistic, and it doesn't take into account aDNA and some other things that are known to happen (things that the evolutionists can't explain, and from what I understand from following Traced and other AIG work, Dr Jeanson and other AIG scientists can't explain them either). Some examples: * The Cohanim (the descendants of Biblical Aaron, and in particular, Zadok, the man who anointed Solomon king, and who later became the high priest, and was the father of the Sadducees, as their sect was named after their father Zadok), can trace their lineage back through Aaron to Adam. However, some are of J1 and some of J2 Y-DNA, but Dr Jeanson's theory would make them sons of Japheth, not Shem. This is an instant failure of Dr Jeanson's theory because it goes against known documented facts. * Again, looking at the Cohanim, about half of them have a genetic marker called the "Cohen Modal Haplotype" (AKA: "Cohen gene"). It's present in Cohanim of both J1 and J2, which would suggest, according to the conventional wisdom, that it must have arisen before J split into J1 and J2, but the vast majority of men in these two groups (non-Cohanim), and half of the Cohanim don't have it, so by the conventional wisdom it had to come after the J1/J2 split. This paradox cannot be explained using the current paradigm. Making it even more paradoxical is the fact that there are also some men who have the Cohen gene who aren't in the J haplogroup. Under the assumptions made by both Dr Jeanson and evolution-based geneticists, this cannot happen. However, it obviously did happen. This leads to the most likely factor being some sort of environmental factor that caused the genetic marker to appear in different men - some relatively closely related, and others not. This, in turn, brings up the possibility of environmental factors causing other genetic changes in men at a population- or sub-population-level, such as via viral genetic splicing, or gene sharing as some have suggested happened for an anti-freeze gene to have gone from one fish species to the herring, then from the herring to a third fish species. Whether gene sharing is correct or not, there's definitely some natural way that different men can end up getting the same non-hereditary mutations, otherwise the Cohen gene could only exist in one haplogroup. * An implication of the Cohen gene and the antifreeze gene in herring is the likelihood of genetic mutations not being uniform in their rate. While the assumption of a uniform mutation rate that Dr Jeanson has made seems reasonable on face value, in reality, just as creationist geologists have found for their field of study, it's a false assumption for genetics, and even some evolutionists are coming to the realisation that genetic changes can happen suddenly. Some environments are likely to cause a higher base mutation rate than others (eg: higher background radiation in one geographical area than another, gene sharing (if it's real), variability in ionising radiation from the sun and cosmic rays, chemical differences in the soil between different locations that cause different mutation rates, etc), so genetic variability is unlikely to occur in accordance with the uniformitarian assumption. With all of this in mind, Dr Jeanson's theory needs a major re-assessment (at the very least, his theory unwittingly either calls the Cohanim imposters or illegitimate sons of unfaithful wives) in order to explain the evidence that is available, such as documented genealogies, aDNA, mutations appearing in whole populations and sub-populations at approximately the same time, non-uniform mutation rate, etc.

[@zerosteel0123]

Can you please time stamp where they say they do not use aDNA. I'd like to hear it myself.

[@AutoEngineerVideos]

@zero steel 012, he mentioned his objections to aDNA in one of the previous videos. Feel free to find a timestamp for yourself. My comment was to the presenter, who doesn't need a timestamp regarding his own freely shared opinions.

[@AutoEngineerVideos]

@Living 2Day, the priestly class (being a sub-set of the Levites) are always under the watchful eye of everyone, especially each other. Given that the penalty for being an adulteress was death, and the penalty for a Cohen adulteress was death by being burned alive, it's fair to say that they would've been more guarded than women are today.

[@judithparker4608]

DEC = 10...X.....TEN DEUS = 2.....11....TWO 🐂 TAX TRIBUTE JANUS = X1.....11 double one Elf....Eleven Babel Court Chaos

[@peggyvorse1461]

I’m not very good with science and not that smart but I have been saying that the Lord cannot wait to return 100 or 1000 years from now because I always figured that the human DNA was degrading.

[@Bookhermit]

Obviously, if there weren't survivors from elsewhere, Noah would be "Y chromosome Adam" and every male would trace back to him directly.

[@1ntwndrboy198]

Very interesting that the DNA is spread out with the introductions of cults. All the way up to present day. Everyone has been affected by these cults which we now call religion.

[@truthgiver8286]

Just an observation but you seem to jump onto any bit of science you can try and make fit your answers but reject outright any that do not fit your Answers. Sensible people know that you should not start with answers. When you made the comment about pseudo Scientist you were obviously talking about yourself.

[@tompaine4044]

Jeanson isn't a scientist, he's a contortionist 😉

[@MadMacGeopolitics]

Sooo... Westerners apparently have a lot of Turkish DNA (correct me if I'm wrong but he seems to be attributing the spread of Y-DNA haplogroup R to Turkic peoples). This conflicts with the obvious fact that Indo-European speakers in both Europe and South Asia have high amounts of Haplogroup R, making great evidence for a prehistoric migration. No mention of this.

[@maxpeck1962]

You must have confused something somewhere. I don't recall him even discussing the Turks in this particular video, but what he does say here and in previous videos and in the book is that R is from central Asian origin and mostly came from the Mongolian empire. From the book summarizing R1b: "spread to western Europe possibly as a result of Ottoman expansion in Europe." So if he mentioned Turks he was probably saying that they drove R1b into western Europe, not that R1b *was* Turkish.

[@MadMacGeopolitics]

@@maxpeck1962 you’re right, I was very confused.