spent like an hour searching for a vidoe that explains this and i stumbled to your videos, thank you so much it really helped, really helpful. really apppreciate you
@sammersonz Жыл бұрын
who else has an engineering maths exam tomorrow lmfao
@TheMathSorcerer Жыл бұрын
good luck:)
@sammersonz Жыл бұрын
@@TheMathSorcerer TY kind sir, i passed my exam. your channel was so much help during my studies, in fact 2 very similar problems like the one you solved here came on my exam xD thanks SUBBED
@peternunrisemmanuella9372 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@juniperjuniper87749 ай бұрын
i got an 86!
@sikertsok2258 ай бұрын
I'm just waiting for my oral exam on this... I'm very very scared.
@educatedbarbarian Жыл бұрын
This helped me learn how to generalize it. My mathematics professor had recently explained the cube roots of unity and I wondered if there was a way to generalize it for an nth root for any number with a real and imaginary part.
@MarceloCelaj9 ай бұрын
bruh this is my first time commentin on a video on yt u have noidea how much uve helped me with this God bless u
@TheMathSorcerer9 ай бұрын
Oh yes this video!!! I remember making this, this topic can be hard to explain. I am so glad it helped!!!!!
@hijohan59109 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. I understood right away
@jorgelau903322 күн бұрын
Thank you
@leepatrick17564 ай бұрын
Very clear! Thanks
@BlackAngel-mf6do4 ай бұрын
Simple and easy, thank you Sir.
@legesesunkurtalagide-ew3nv3 ай бұрын
yes
@HarshalKanumuri5 ай бұрын
apologies if this is a continuation of a previous video , where can I find the proof of the alpha value ? Thank you ( Great video )
@dandelion78856 ай бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH!! None of the other videos I found were able to explain this concept as clearly as you did 😭
@Abc19853 Жыл бұрын
Plz sir tell what is the proof of these formulas to find roots?
@zianiera7 ай бұрын
Nicely explained
@optimalcodex8394 Жыл бұрын
thank uu
@trevorbrasch1118 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful!
@legesesunkurtalagide-ew3nv3 ай бұрын
thanks
@ZhiyingYe-c3h5 ай бұрын
is there a way to quickly find out how many possible roots a complex number will have?
@konozaand37062 жыл бұрын
At 8:51 is cos(pi / 4) not equal to 1/sqrt(2) ?
@untermensch7872 жыл бұрын
They are both the same number, multiply 1/sqrt(2) by itself and you'll see it
@markomdfk6663 Жыл бұрын
i have been taught that the denominator cant be a sqrt so you have to rationalise ( mulyiply by the sqrt in this example sqrt(2) so the one is now sqrt(2)/2
@bradleywang289 Жыл бұрын
@@markomdfk6663it can during calculations, it’s just an agreed upon form,similar to how fractions have to be simplified
@Adroitbit8 ай бұрын
wait if theta=0 then we have at least two answer? But theta=0 is real number so there should be only one answer? I'm confused [EDIT] ok Nth root of numbers is defined differently than those sqrt() or cbrt() function
@spirall21004 ай бұрын
a level math sucks but u made it easier
@muaazkhan53883 ай бұрын
what if it says find the roots instead of square roots
@Pixe-gv6tt4 ай бұрын
im still lost atp 10th grade maths is crazy.
@Vishnu_akulwar3 ай бұрын
(2x+3) (3x-1) (x-2) is the right answer of DIY
@immmeneee5 ай бұрын
Ap precalc😢
@rebanathpegulearner125220 күн бұрын
Cos π/4=
@user-hc4on6pg1n3 ай бұрын
Why is n=2?
@tresorfonkam48333 ай бұрын
Square root(2) So 2!
@tombouie4 ай бұрын
Thks; How are they different? Cube root vs the exponent of 1/3 kzbin.info/www/bejne/amXOc61oYteZnq8
@MiltonRoy-j3t11 күн бұрын
Huels Land
@samuel-williamhoule471310 ай бұрын
yo le gros t'écrit fkg ben
@MelissaMelance7 ай бұрын
Mee😂😂
@pelasgeuspelasgeus46344 ай бұрын
Complex numbers are fake invented math because (1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number-an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error; (2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error; (3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system.
@chriszablocki24602 жыл бұрын
Its not that complicated. If you tell me the truth, I don't have to find the answers publicly. If it's difficult to say, write it down on a piece of notebook paper.