Struggled with this a bit in my class but this video helped clear up the topic for me. Thank you!
@Nevaska113 жыл бұрын
You have no idea how your video helped me! i wasn't founding this specific information in portuguese, but when i searched in english, your video was the first one to pop up!
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
That is good to hear, glad it was helpful!
@ivythedazzlinggirl22892 жыл бұрын
You don't understand how well you explain! Thank you sir
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words!
@hemrajpatil66343 жыл бұрын
Dr. You are a real Doctor of chemistry 😭😭 solved all my problems in chemistry
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Happy to help!
@lame_pratham3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Dr. B, I was struggling with topic for a week.
@arbeeyamelo2913 жыл бұрын
You help me a lot sir! Would you teach us organic chemistry soon?
@Sp4ACEC4d3t22 күн бұрын
Hi! Alright. But what about those few transition elements whose electron configuration don't follow Aufbau principle? (i.e. Au, Ag, Cu...). Thank you for the video!!:)
@andrewmathias3 жыл бұрын
Dr. B, Your videos are helping me learn so well!! You are the best! Thank you so much for doing this. You are my hero! Andrew
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@beigomaacademymathsclub58733 жыл бұрын
Dr, I find your videos highly useful. Keep up the great work. I would like to watch the derivation of the Schrödinger equation.
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, most appreciated. I too would like to watch a derivation of the Schrödinger equation! It's been a while since I've worked with that.
@Muhammadislahmedia2 жыл бұрын
.
@heatheryousif49114 ай бұрын
Just wanted to write THANK YOU for explaining this in a simple easy way
@wbreslyn4 ай бұрын
You are most welcome!
@weirdo214 Жыл бұрын
I have my exam tmr and you’ve helped me more then my chem teacher ever could haha thank you!!
@aaroncurci64882 жыл бұрын
So funny I had a chem lecture today , I knew what we were going to learn , so instead of wasting my time In class I can just watch this KZbin video and learn the same thing I need to know for class from my room , awesome
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@solerin92163 жыл бұрын
can the last two electron configuration be always the basis for the number of their valence electrons?
@ariva73692 жыл бұрын
Thank you but shouldn't the valence electrons be 2 for most transitional metals except for copper and chromium because they are just exceptions? Like, aren't valence electrons defined as the number of electrons in the outermost shell or energy level? So in both cases that you pointed out, the valence electrons were 2 because there were two electrons in the outermost shell: 4s2.
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
You really have to look at the Noble gas core. This should explain in more detail: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valence_electron#Electron_configuration Let me know if it doesn't make sense.
@fireballzz39232 жыл бұрын
Makes Total Sense
@swapnathota45277 ай бұрын
Same doubt....
@abelelias45533 ай бұрын
Nah , you might be taking Abt valency
@vidyarthi9212 ай бұрын
It is different think valance electrons and valency of the elements
@Nectarie-RobertCiobotaru10 ай бұрын
Keep up the good work, very comprehensive explanation.
@wbreslyn10 ай бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@austrianpainter-x2mАй бұрын
i love you so much, this video is a rare thing to find
@wbreslynАй бұрын
You are most welcome!
@pradipbijwe19043 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for this video. But can you please explain how to find the valency of transition elements through electronic configuration?????
@lightcapmath27773 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video to clarify the number of possible valence electrons for the d-block elements. Many thanks Dr. B
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome!
@lightcapmath27773 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn Thank you Wayne. I have two chem students at this time. I refereed your channel to them. As finals are coming closer I can only do so much to help them. Your videos will be a great help to them. I too assume that many other students have learned more for you (your videos) then in class. Please keep up your passion. peace David
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
@@lightcapmath2777 Thanks David, that is most appreciated. My sense is that students are often seeing the content for the second time when they watch my videos. So only part of the credit goes to my videos!
@lightcapmath27773 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn OK will agree with that. But your ability to show clarity shines above most chem teacher now a days. Peace David
@honeybun04102 ай бұрын
Greatly explained 👍
@kays6403 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr. B! Is there a video for the electron configuration of lanthanides and actinides. Did not expect it on a practice exam
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Not yet but I'll put it on my list!
@kays6403 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn Thank you Dr. B! Have a great weekend
@professionalr81712 жыл бұрын
Sir u made me emotional.....😭...you teach better than my coaching teachers ..m
@Mwamy11 Жыл бұрын
You are amazing teacher 🎉
@lilibodnar3581 Жыл бұрын
This was very helpful when I needed it, thank you 😊
@ysabellabongcaras Жыл бұрын
do we really need to arrange the electron configuration according to increasing energy levels, Sir? we got confused by this in one of our activities in class since we only follow the aufbau principle.
@pra49824 күн бұрын
Thx man big time ❤
@wbreslyn24 күн бұрын
No problem 👍
@JM-gp9gr3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this short and understandable explanation :))))
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@alimukhtar47592 ай бұрын
So, for transition metals like "W" the 4f 5d and 6s electrons will be the valence electrons right??
@anonymousguy77543 жыл бұрын
Sir how can we know that how many electrons are going to be used by element out of these valence electrons??????
@nauwwww9 ай бұрын
Wyatt about Tungsten W? It has 6 valence electrons but the configuration is [Xe]6s2 4f14 5d4 the sum is 20
@StockDoctortrade2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. This was much easier than I thought it was
@santumos Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much... based on the examples, it looks like you don't need the electron configuration (like subshell and energy levels). Instead it looks like we could take the atomic number of the element, and substract the atomic number of the closest noble gas "beneath" it. Is that fair?
@wbreslyn Жыл бұрын
Part of the challenge is using only the number of valence electrons you have for the structure and optimizing the formal charges. Seems like making two double bonds between the N and each O would make it so the valence electrons would be a problem.
@mikayelhovhannisyan94453 жыл бұрын
Sir , I have a question , what is the difference between dissolving and dissociating ??
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
The big difference is that dissociating means breaking apart into ions. A substance can dissolve (like sugar) but not dissociate. This is because sugar does not form ions. Something like NaCl can dissolve and dissociate.
@mikayelhovhannisyan94453 жыл бұрын
So you mean that in NaCl’s case dissociating and dissolving are the same ?
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
@@mikayelhovhannisyan9445 It would dissolve and dissociate. So I suppose you consider them the same in this case but chemistry is always picky about terms. Probably best to go with dissociate. Perhaps the interesting question is whether it would dissolve and then dissociate. Or does it instantly dissociate. I'm not sure how one would test that! Perhaps with some type of very accurate conductivity meter.
@shairahcortez3 жыл бұрын
ur actually best thank you so much
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome!
@solerin92163 жыл бұрын
do we need to find the nble gas core or can we just go look at the last two electron configuration and add them up to get the number of valence electrons?
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Technically I'd look at what is after the Noble Gas Core.
@freztok47283 жыл бұрын
Sir, I got a question why do you always choose Argon to compare?
@davedhairya77123 күн бұрын
Because it's the nearest noble gas
@PawanKumar-or5qd2 жыл бұрын
Very nice explaination
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@TheLivirus Жыл бұрын
I'm confused. If Fe has 8 valence electrons, doesn't that make it inert/noble?
@punyamritmanhas19182 жыл бұрын
Sir, what would be valence electrons for Os [Xe]6s2 4f14 5d6 ?
@vincentagustin510 Жыл бұрын
The answer is 8. You dont count the 14 from the f because it is stable enough.
@mlc9928 Жыл бұрын
Great video. Thanks
@edenjones28462 жыл бұрын
HI i have a question, how come the d shell was complete in the zirconium element for eg it was 3d10, whereas in the previous elements it was incomplete?? im confused
@yarakitty27383 жыл бұрын
Dr, I got a little confused because my professor in college told me that even for transition metals we take the electrons for the largest n as valence electrons. Is that right?
@tasnim73263 жыл бұрын
Umm, did u find out! If yes can u explain
@arviejanedetorres24853 жыл бұрын
SIR CAN YOU ANSWER MEEE RIGHT AWAY ? I REALLY NEED AN ANSWER QUICK COZ IM CONFUSED A BIT. THE VALENCE ELECTRON CONFIGURATION OF XENON IS 5s2, 4d10 and 5p6 RIGHT? SO THE VALENCE ELECTRON IN XENON HERE IS 18 RIGHT? I HOPE U NOTICE MEEE QUICK. THANK YOUUU
@bakulaw67932 жыл бұрын
how about the AgCl sir? after doing that, I got the result of 30 valence of Ag, how am I going to write it as lewis dots??
@santhoshbalaji37663 жыл бұрын
Why cadmium shows only two valance electrons? Can you please explain that sir?
@mrsai18763 жыл бұрын
Nice Explanation sir ...
@idduboyinaramu241424 күн бұрын
I think there are some flaws in this video because how can count 3d orbital's and 4s orbital's electrons as valence electrons as 3d belongs to 3rd shell(M-shell) where as 4s belongs to 4th shell(N-shell) they don't belong to the same shell then how do you count them together as valence electrons??
@dudeman4400 Жыл бұрын
can you explain how to write cobalt in dot structure when cobalt has 9?
@kalle7533 Жыл бұрын
4:00 should I write 9 valance electrons around the cobalt when I have lewis structure ? How can it be pls someone tell I can’t understand 😢
@somyajatav57312 жыл бұрын
greatly helpful thankyou ........
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
No problem!
@someone-xl9wp11 ай бұрын
THANK YOU
@professional-amateur2 жыл бұрын
So I just subtract the element's number to it's nearest noble gas's number? sorry for the bad english
@joe_ninety_one50765 ай бұрын
It seems that you do not have to sort out the electron configuration, just look at the atomic number and subtract the atomic number of the nearest noble gas.
@bluxeedits3533 Жыл бұрын
I love this 🎉
@wbreslyn Жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@JasonKleandros3 жыл бұрын
great video thank you !!
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome!
@cricwold6116 Жыл бұрын
But what anout zinc it is having 3d10 , 4s2, but it is having only 2 valence electrons how ?
@maribelchavez79283 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@kisho2679 Жыл бұрын
which would noble metals be?
@khalebajneed64402 жыл бұрын
Why did you write 4s after 3d ? According to the Electron Configuration, this isn’t true.
@km10is Жыл бұрын
I have the same question. I guess it doesn't make a difference for the # of valence electrons, but if he's putting 3d before 4s, then why doesn't he fill 3d more?
@251060193 жыл бұрын
1:40 sir I didn't understand why did u take up argon as noble gas, we could have taken neon also right ? Pls someone help me :(
@emanuelporporatto7383 жыл бұрын
Ar has 18é so -> Fe: [Ar] 3d6 4s2 one can use Ne too -> Fe: [Ne] 3s2 3p6 3d6 4s2 valeuuuuu salve
@251060193 жыл бұрын
@@emanuelporporatto738 Ok thank u ☺
@poonamkhanna30274 ай бұрын
We used Ar because it is the nearest noble gas
@33xhasaurabhkumar652 жыл бұрын
Sir where are u stay ? And what is the valence electron of copper (cu) ? Please tell me🥺
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
I'm in the US right now. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqnOYWxpjNp0d9U
@webenglishretinarevision49443 жыл бұрын
How many valence elections there in zinc?
@anVtcCB0byBreXM3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@carlichildres25 күн бұрын
For cobalt, 9 valence electrons, I thought elements could only have 8 valence electrons?
@wbreslyn24 күн бұрын
Transition metals are a bit different. They have d orbitals and that makes things more complicated.
@vlogs2.0ahad343 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir ❤👈
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Most welcome!
@Aya_Mohamed23 жыл бұрын
You forgot the copper exception :(
@senpaiorius25633 жыл бұрын
I think 4s comes before 3d
@elaine38672 жыл бұрын
Sir, thank you.
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@theangledsaxon67652 жыл бұрын
what about valencies after the f block? Pt has 6 valence electrons :(
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@tasnim73263 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks 😇
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
No problem 👍
@kisho26795 ай бұрын
how much valence electrons do f-block elements have?
@wbreslyn5 ай бұрын
They can hold up to 14.
@idduboyinaramu241424 күн бұрын
@@wbreslynHow can valence electrons go up to 14 ? As the valence electrons that an element can have are 8 only
@scoobiedoobiedapdap10093 жыл бұрын
How do you know what the core is? Pls reply asap my exam is tomorrow
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
It is the abbreviated or condensed electron configuration.
@mircea-andreigherasim96082 жыл бұрын
So.. why do iron or other transition metals choose not to use all the valence electrons.. why only 4+ or something else instead of all 8? :D
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
That requires a rather long explanation. Transition metals can be tricky because of the their d orbitals.
@mircea-andreigherasim96082 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn Can you redirect me to an explanation (like a link to an article or a youtube video), I'm trying to learn as much as i can right now for a mineralogy exam, thank you for the quick response btw! :D
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
@@mircea-andreigherasim9608 This might be useful: ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-111-principles-of-chemical-science-fall-2008/resources/lecture-27/ Maybe this ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-111sc-principles-of-chemical-science-fall-2014/pages/unit-iv-transition-metals-oxidation-reduction-reactions/lecture-28/ All the best on your mineralogy exam!
@mircea-andreigherasim96082 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn Thanks a lot!!
@jescelsalera25873 жыл бұрын
How about, the valence electrons of Gold?
@김현성-c2i3 жыл бұрын
고맙습니다
@joey111 Жыл бұрын
Dr. B, you’re so pretty and cute! You’re so smart I hope you find all the love and peace in the world. I love you, you’re my hero! 🤍
@follersofmohammad42473 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@manojkumarupadhyay76663 жыл бұрын
Sir plzz explain reaction between : Aluminium oxide and Sodium hydroxide
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
It's a bit involved... Check this out: www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_reaction_between_aluminum_oxidized_in_a_NaOH_solution
@manojkumarupadhyay76663 жыл бұрын
Ok sir.. thanks
@alphaMango13 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir 🥰
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Most welcome
@ianpaulanthonycuyos9647Ай бұрын
Or I could just subtract the atomic number of the transition metal to the atomic number of the noble gas before that transition metal?
@ianpaulanthonycuyos9647Ай бұрын
Then adjust later depending on the charge
@جنى-ب9ذ9 ай бұрын
i fucking love you bro thank u so much
@kushagra97812 жыл бұрын
What about case of silver?
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Here you go! kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y56zgZelequgbrM
@kushagra97812 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn thnx🙂
@BDachille3 жыл бұрын
short answer at 4:50
@14-dibyajitmandal452 жыл бұрын
Someone please help me... What does 's,p,d' stand for?
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
This guy's video is good: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYGWZoGrqNV6os0
@professionalr81712 жыл бұрын
🏆
@vanshikaa1011 Жыл бұрын
WHAT ABOUT VALENCY SIR?
@canadiancookiee3939 Жыл бұрын
How can you have 9 ve. I thought max was 8 for octet.
@wbreslyn Жыл бұрын
There are many exceptions to the octet rule. Expanded octets are actually fairly common. See Exceptions to the Octet Rule: kzbin.info/www/bejne/epzNXoaDd7GEsK8
@charidias91323 жыл бұрын
award from me👏🙏
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
😎
@K.B3992 жыл бұрын
What about copper ?
@wbreslyn2 жыл бұрын
Here you go: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqnOYWxpjNp0d9U
@lebranttt75922 жыл бұрын
Cant you just do "Elektrons from element - Elektrons noble gase = valence elektrons of the element"
@retrosynthdid44763 жыл бұрын
then why does Cd have 2 electrons? shouldn't it have 10
@vincentagustin510 Жыл бұрын
Cadmium is [Kr] 4d10 5s2, by default, it should have a total of 12 valence electrons. However, in reality the 4d orbit having 10 electrons makes it very stable, which means it likely won't lose those 10 electrons. Therefore, the only valence electrons are the 2 from the 5s orbit.
@abdelhameedsalah59103 жыл бұрын
The d subshell must have 10 valence electrons to go after it?
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
d can hold up to ten electrons. For transition metals the d subhell is incomplete (or it forms cations with an incomplete d subshell).
@abdelhameedsalah59103 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn I understand thanks, I appreciate helping me in my after tomorrow final🙏
@abdelhameedsalah59103 жыл бұрын
@@wbreslyn how can I know num of electrons in d subshell?
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
@@abdelhameedsalah5910 You'd have to write the electron configuration. For example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpS7m2lmmLiIjpY
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
@@abdelhameedsalah5910 All the best on your final!
@aronsayas90513 жыл бұрын
how come Ni has 2 valence?
@vincentagustin510 Жыл бұрын
Nickel is [Ar] 4s2 3d8, in theory the total is 10 valence electrons, which is a valid answer. However, some scientists say that since the oxidation state of Nickel doesn't go beyond 4, the 8 in the 3d orbit will not give up for bonding. Which means that there are only 2 valence electrons (from 4s orbit). Please check with your professor to verify which answer is correct.
@mayankghare73692 жыл бұрын
🤯
@rigel5010 ай бұрын
I swear, i wouldn't search google for studies. They said 29 valence electrons for Fe. Tf!?
@shobhak87833 жыл бұрын
Thanx
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
👍
@Mentalstrength6473 жыл бұрын
👍
@wbreslyn3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@oscaraucoin23847 ай бұрын
this doesn't work for Cd
@MHlTE3 ай бұрын
Explain?
@Truth_Çkr Жыл бұрын
This is not a challenging thing to explain or understand. Why don’t we learn this is regular chemistry???