How to play Danger the Game

[@mrmurpleqwerty4838]

Danger: You are playing Danger: the Game Plot twist: You have to act out what your danger card says.

[@5000p-o9p]

Dude. No.

[@demonmysterykid3343]

Yes as long as it's not too dangerous.

[@Exotic_St4rxxx]

lol

[@Solid_Sayori]

You can reveal this card in your hand; your opponent randomly chooses 1 card from your entire hand, then you discard the chosen card. Then, if the discarded card was not "Danger! Bigfoot!", Special Summon 1 "Danger! Bigfoot!" from your hand, and if you do, draw 1 card. If this card is discarded: You can target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; destroy it. You can only use this effect of "Danger! Bigfoot!" once per turn.

[@DrDrao]

You can reveal this card in your hand; your opponent randomly chooses 1 card from your entire hand, then you discard the chosen card. Then, if the discarded card was not "Danger!? Jackalope?", Special Summon 1 "Danger!? Jackalope?" from your hand, and if you do, draw 1 card. If this card is discarded: You can Special Summon 1 "Danger!" monster from your Deck in Defense Position, except "Danger!? Jackalope?". You can only use this effect of "Danger!? Jackalope?" once per turn.

[@mockingb1rd403]

I love yugioh :)

[@ivan-pk1wq]

@@mockingb1rd403 PEND BEST DECK LETS GOOOOOOI

[@mockingb1rd403]

@@ivan-pk1wq i’m actually a pendulum main-

[@juniotongol2392]

???

[@mithogui]

The rules are the same as regular chess, except for the following changes:

[@patranak32]

For a refresher of those rules 👆 check out this video

[@ragesh198410]

Layout the board.

[@thekingkru4786]

Sheeeeeeeeeeeesh

[@DarknessCorrupts]

deal 3 blah blah blah

[@TheGoodWario]

You misspelled Cards Against Humanity.

[@fishybwotha1234]

New Rule: Saboteur This goes with the villain gamemode The player to the right of the villain is considered the saboteur The Saboteur is not given a danger card At discussion phase, the saboteur grabs 3 plot twist cards, and can "sabotage" the discussing player. Once the next person discusses, put all plot twist cards you didn't use at the bottom of the deck and draw three more. Repeat until discussion phase ends The villain will be the new Saboteur

[@kevinglass1186]

For the final variation, does the villain choose which danger to give each player, or are they randomly dealt out?

[@origamiwhalegames150]

Hey Kevin, The villain chooses what danger to place the player in! Every good villain does their research after all and would want to put heroes in dangers their skills aren't specifically suited to. Thank goodness heroes always have an ace up their sleeve, or in this case a tool card!

[@kevinglass1186]

@@origamiwhalegames150 Thanks!

[@zabilaahmed5263]

@@kevinglass1186 do you have the game?

[@SpaceIsAwesome035]

@@zabilaahmed5263 they literally made it

[@Jray608]

@Lille’s Nebby Why would the maker of the game ask questions about it on a how to play video of it?

[@infrakazos]

To win more easily, have friends. They will always say you are the best chance

[@JannPoo]

That's the issue I see in this game. You better play with people that want to play for fun and not to win and that aren't biased toward any particular player. The villain variant seems less problematic since the judge can't win, but they could still favor a friend.

[@Vearru]

@@JannPoo Even more issue though is even if you are playing for fun and not to win the group might not want to end the game right away because they are having fun with what cards they have and so they still don’t want to pick the person who would win the game. So really I think this game would be better played by simply setting a time limit or a number of rounds and going until that is done, and then rather than having a winner at the end of that have a top rescuer, or in the villain version have a most powerful hero.

[@cosmicfails2053]

Can you combine Villain and Plot twist together to make the villain able to give a secret hidden plot twist to each player's set?

[@jamesneo-lk8zx]

That would be cool, just imagine trying to stop an astroid with shadow puppetry but only to realise you worse at everything else

[@SysFan808]

idea: BONUS mode after the winner is chosen, have the winner's dangers be played all at once.

[@guilhermedom2228]

0:28 RE:Zero vibes dude

[@aaronking2020]

Monty Python aswell

[@thecoolcongle5128]

2:28 Dinner is ready! 2:30 Set the table!

[@Iknowhowbadthisnameis8828]

Don't understand

[@therealelement75]

i thought there was no more killer rabbits (i'm too lazy to go get some)

[@anonymousmonkey9491]

this sounds wicked fun, wouldn't lie...now if only I had irl friends.

[@Sakura_Sabre]

you could have someone with both the physical game and a lot of time on their hand to make the game in tabletop simulator, then have all your online friends get tts and play it that way

[@anonymousmonkey9491]

@@Sakura_Sabre except my tabletop simulator mates went back to league of legends for some reason...guess it was a fad for them T_T

[@無問西東]

@@Sakura_SabreWhat do you mean by “tts?”

[@無問西東]

@@anonymousmonkey9491What do you mean by “T_T?”

[@stevevon5954]

Show us how to play exploding kittens.

[@DrRank]

Or better yet, its Corusantian cousin, Star Wars: I've Got A Bad Feeling About This!

[@Bombro12345]

LMAO

[@outdatedautopsyproductions8427]

Don't

[@thatsguy1111]

Just watch the exploding kitten youtube channel

[@DoubleSidedSpoon]

Ok, i will show you. You take a bomb, a kitten, combine them, and then run for your life! It's that easy!

[@mvenini]

If a player has two danger cards, then why would the victim ever choose that players story?. It would end the game and the victim would lose.. So each game would have everybody holding two danger cards, and the victim would be unable to win, as they would have to choose the winner.

[@a.t.fa.t.f7031]

I mean, if you are very competitive then yes. If you are playing the game for fun (which I am assuming most people are/will) then its just whoever manages to get the 3 best explanations. A bit like CAH but the person who picks knows who played what.

[@kevelimlane265]

Which is why you should go until the deck is gone instead.

[@whatd0605]

@@kevelimlane265 I don't think that would quite solve the problem. As long as the Victim always knows who played what and who has the most and least number of danger cards, they can always just pick someone with the lowest or tied for lowest. The game would always end with the winning player having a lead of 1 or being tied for first.

[@videogamerNattie98]

@@whatd0605 Imma have to go with A.T.F on that one if very competitive then yes but this game is not about winning similar to card games like Superfight its about the crazy stupid scenarios and situations you and your friends end up in that is discussed amongst the table and how good are you at using what you have to negotiate the situation to your favor. So taking it seriously like that ruins the point of the game and turns it into a simple and pointless number game that undermines the point of why your playing.

[@meleamendez6221]

Hmm how about a vote system and the winners name of each round is placed inside the box without anyone other than the victim knowing and the game will end with a timer

[@GummyPikminProductions]

0:30 you can hear him laugh

[@Iknowhowbadthisnameis8828]

Lol

[@YairDking]

For the first scenario, why not just use the holy hand grenade of Antioch? Just take out the holy pin, then though shall count to 5 I mean 3! and then throw it.

[@spamtongspamton9900]

“Whoever lives life the most dangerously goes first” and how in tarnation is that determined

[@therealelement75]

everyone points at who goes first and majority rules ties go to rps

[@Vearru]

The issue with this game is of course the winning mechanic, if you are playing to win it doesn’t make sense to go with the best story every time if it’ll give an opponent the winning danger. Of course this game doesn’t seem to be best suited to a lot of competition, so it would be better to play for fun with a little bit of friendly competition. Even more issue though is even if you are playing for fun and not to win the group might not want to end the game right away because they are having fun with what cards they have and so they still don’t want to pick the person who would win the game. So really I think this game would be better played by simply setting a time limit or a number of rounds and going until that is done. Then rather than having a winner at the end of that have a top rescuer, or in the villain version have a most powerful hero.

[@FXFGamer]

It really doesn't have to be that profound. I expect most people to play this for the shits and giggles of each scenario than to genuinely try to win.

[@sheesh4762]

does the villian decide to give someone danger card or the victim

[@maciejtorbicz9616]

Villan

[@muhammadhashimmushtaq7051]

The last variant is basically just the heroes and villains intellect swapped. Hero’s don’t tell their plan on how to defeat the villain. The villain does that.

[@sheesh4762]

can someone plz tell me about the role of the villian i didn't understand much

[@localsniper3050]

I think you can equal this as a DM or an upgraded and a little more complicated version of the victim.

[@tdm_nicky5603]

When it comes to the the person who lives life the most dangerous what if no one can make up their mind or like what if it's a tie like if it were to be way too close or something like do they just both go at the same time or is it like some rock paper or scissors you must make up your mind thing

[@inrediblepotatoe7764]

I Played robbery in the bank and the police arrested i think there's soemthing wrong with the rules can you pkease explain it to me

[@ryanasaurasisgood]

“Whoever lives life most dangerously goes first” Hah, I guess I always go first.

[@DynamiqFrog]

I really wanna buy this game but its sold out on amazon and Origami Whale. Any other ways of obtaining this game?

[@misspynai]

Target.. I just bought mines today as a gift for my younger brother. It would most likely be in the board games aisle

[@DynamiqFrog]

@@misspynai No target in the UK bro😅

[@xavierburval4128]

This is like apples to apples but darker

[@WackoMcGoose]

I was thinking more Cards Against Humanity, but you are technically also correct.

[@Emredem_Geography]

Who Many Years To Play

[@pawiler1080]

"The rules are the same as regular danger except for these changes. For a refresher of those rules check out this video."

[@Bookworm12-j9t]

Give each person a deadly weapon. Alternatively, play on a rooftop.

[@burgundybunnie]

So its Card Against Humanity but death.

[@jlbjlb]

Or Apples to Apples

[@revimfadli4666]

@@jlbjlb but death

[@ZillaSupreme]

Safety is not an answer. Safety is a question, and the answer is NO

[@energyーy]

Plot twist + villain variants

[@josephprecioso2489]

how to play:scrabble

[@aso-bg3ny]

Is that a joke?

[@jellyalexcodanimations8593]

This is practically a speech therapy game.

[@lessthan1446]

Hi

[@trinstonmichaels7062]

Trinston was here ..

[@kirakelvinart2169]

this game is interesting...

[@dynamite2275]

man, this seems a bit unsafe.

[@towerman3873]

Cards against humanity: Superhero edition

[@aceofarrows]

The rules are the same as regular Cards Against Humanity, except for the following changes:

[@torhundal2182]

this game feels like apples to apples but with more cards

[@purplepop413]

i was thinking that

[@jarwinb1008]

So it’s similar to apples to apples except your in danger

[@isaacmeyer6954]

Is this apples to apples

[@gameryolo323]

It's just like Apple to apple

[@masterimbecile]

Sounds like cards against humanity but more PG

[@johnssachikaha3009]

Today tenga word search

[@nhatpham4366]

Db

[@21y790]

80

[@crazio2635]

Cards against humanity but less fun

[@MrNagathisen]

🤐

[@DreamCraftsxoxo]

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[@christopherearth9714]

This video is unnecessary. Just say literally anything about Asians/gay people on Twitter to play.

[@victoriagripas3397]

This is not a chess set!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@Zaraa414]

Lel

[@horuslupercal9936]

How about we save the money from this game and just drink some vodka til we puke.

[@R4idenXS]

Sounds hella boring and bound to start a fight or bitterness.

[@parkertown2229]

Maybe your just uncreative

[@sonicmeerkat]

so cards against humanity but you gotta slow the game down with debates. yeah doesn't seem that fun tbh