How To Start the 60 Day Clock to Get a Response on a Mandamus Lawsuit

Рет қаралды 1,607

Жыл бұрын

When suing the government to compel a decision on a long-delayed immigration application, a critical element is starting the litigation clock as soon as possible. In other words: beginning the government’s 60 day time period to respond to the lawsuit and, hopefully, pressuring them to decide the underlying application before their time to respond expires. This time period starts when the government has been “served.”
“Service of Process” is the legal phrase that describes the lawful delivery of legal papers to a party legally entitled to receive them. The identity of the papers and who may deliver them, to whom, when, how, etc., are all critical elements of this requirement.
Fortunately, service on the government is governed by easy-to-follow rules. There is also the added benefit that the government will generally not seek to evade service. The only complications are those caused by a failure to follow the rules.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) describes how to serve the “United States and its agencies, corporations, officers, or employees.” It is worth reading. But the punch line is simple. The most efficient and cost-effective way of serving the government is for counsel to send a copy of the summons and complaint by certified mail to the: (1) U.S. Attorney General; (2) the U.S. Attorneys’ Office (in the district where the case was filed); and, (3) the Executive Office of the Legal Adviser of the agency or agency head that has been named as a defendant.
The physical location of the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Offices rarely change. Occasionally confirming their address is a good habit. The location of each of the agencies, however, should be checked regularly. And if suing a consulate, the U.S. Department of State should be named as a defendant and service should be sent to its “General Counsel.”
Some of the defendants are individuals, such as heads of agencies, consulate personnel, etc., who are being sued in their official capacity. As a result, complications may ensue if these individuals subsequently die, resign, or otherwise cease to hold office. Rule 25 provides that an officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party and future pleadings should name that successor. Any misnomer is usually disregarded (unless it affects substantial rights). While Rule 25(d) provides for substitution as a matter of law, it’s always a good idea to notify the court of the change by inserting a footnote after the change in the case caption and briefly explaining the change.
Finally, it is our firm’s general practice - the result of litigating many cases involving the federal government and working closely with government lawyers - to deliver or email a copy of the summons and complaint to the relevant U.S. Attorney Civil Division chief or intake desk. This is only a courtesy. And it never hurts.
Have a question..... CALL or EMAIL for a free consultation.
ABOUT US
Sarraf Gentile LLP is a law firm focused on representing individuals nationwide in immigration matters, class actions and other complex federal and state litigation. The Firm's cases have collectively recovered over $2 billion.
CONTACT US
Web: www.sarrafgentile.com
Email: info@sarrafgentile.com
Phone: 516-899-8890
Copyright Sarraf Gentile LLP
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE SIMILAR OUTCOME
Please note that the information provided in this video and on our website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available therein are for general informational purposes only. Information in this video and on our website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Viewing this video, commenting below, visiting our website, calling, writing our office, sending an email, or contracting us by any means does not create an attorney-client relationship.
#immigration
#mandamus