How to teach BJJ without drilling (ecological approach game design with Craig Hutchison)

Рет қаралды 3,862

Josh Beam BJJ

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 43

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

Should I release more from this session? (Standing/takedowns, also things like berimbolos, lapel guard, de la riva)

@ghandn 3 ай бұрын

Yes!

@RafaelFerreira-yo7jl 3 ай бұрын

yeah

@samuelchavarriamurillo6814 3 ай бұрын

Please!

@IvoryPagoda 3 ай бұрын

Josh, bro, you know we want to see it, why do you tease like this

@nathankurtz5960 3 ай бұрын

Yes!

@denneychoi 3 ай бұрын

It's the small tips in between the big discussion points that stuck out to me Craig's Tips That Helped Me: - If win conditions are met super quick, have a redo - switching sides off clear start and end points are ideal (add'l tips on when switching is best vs repeats or switching off time) - ideally, the coach has cues prepared and is used during each game (language mattered to Craig and used them liberally during the games to the students. real use case of calling attn live vs post-game which is an improvement area for me) - game design: if the issue is one major part, remove that part to mentally solidify the issue in students mind. Reintroduce issue and intention is damn near perma-set Thanks Josh, Craig, and Max for putting this together

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

Dude love these notes, thanks Denney, appreciate you as always!

@denneychoi 3 ай бұрын

This is reference to the relationship of the difficulty of the game and timing of when to implement them. Craig started with the mad dog then next game was with frames defeated (at least at the start). It really made sense to me to establish problem then removing the key issue, the frame. The second game is designed for the student to win essentially. The real takeaway is calling attention to the key issue of the mad dog then bringing the frame back in. It's almost like a rhetorical question that you put the student thru. They come into the previous game with more focus on the problem. It's the same dynamic as starting from the terminal position then working your way back up stream (ex. start with armbar extension games then move onto connection break games). At its core, it's about controlling variables. In this case, there's something to be said about starting with the problem, removing problem, then going back into it. Going up and down stream in this case. I learned from that. That was badass. Craig did a great job reminding us that the sets up of these games will differed depending on size of group. So that was good to keep in mind when working through the video. He mentioned how Max switched sides to defeat the frame, so I'm now thinking about this for my butterfly half class later today, I'll modify some games to keep in mind what Craig said here.

@cjmurdock7971 3 ай бұрын

More content please!!! Great video!!!

@ngterr2008 3 ай бұрын

Of course we want more!

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

lol ok fine! 😂

@hill050dk 3 ай бұрын

I want to see more. I haven’t seen enough of eco in the Gi. Thank you

@sirbalanced5486 3 ай бұрын

the mini-games where each player has a goal is brilliant.

@ghandn 3 ай бұрын

Dude I haven't heard of Craig before but his insights are awesome! makes me want to train right now hahaha

@TrueLegacyStudio 3 ай бұрын

This was a fun watch!

@nathankurtz5960 3 ай бұрын

Please release more! Both training and interview!

@andreas2218 3 ай бұрын

Great video! De la riva would be nice as well!

@keithdillon7914 2 ай бұрын

This was so good! Thanks!

@joshbeambjj 2 ай бұрын

Yessir absolutely! Thanks for watching. I actually just released a free collection of gi games (with this crazy dog one included) if you’re interested in more like this: ko-fi.com/s/4b21a478f5

@grapplinggoblin 3 ай бұрын

POST THE INTERVIEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@adamillingworth5944 3 ай бұрын

🔥 interesting, thanks ✌️

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

You bet! Thanks for watching

@joeluisi4943 3 ай бұрын

great video

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

@joeluisi4943 3 ай бұрын

show us the bolo and lapel guards plz

@joshbeambjj 3 ай бұрын

ok i'll put it on the list! thanks for commenting

@combatlearning 2 ай бұрын

Wouldn't let me add this to the previous comment, so here it is separate: I don't want to come off nitpicky, but positional sparring does have constraints. Even free sparring has constraints. Every type of training has constraints. Constraints-led approach is aware of it, and it manipulates constraints according to its own principles of how movement best emerges for certain contexts or environments. CLA is going to be increasingly hard to understand if we try to focus only on where it differs with other methodologies or try to limit its extend to where it is noticeable different. In fact you should be positional sparring within CLA and it does not cease to be CLA when you do.

@combatlearning 2 ай бұрын

wow it looks like my first comment is completely disappeared too! facepalm

@combatlearning 2 ай бұрын

Anyway, I should also add that representativeness and task difficulty or only correlate to one another an not the same thing. The dial has to do with the level of representativeness of the task of the task which has to do with the number of elements it shares with the performance environment. It doesn't necessarily represent task complexity and it definitely does not represent the perceived difficulty of a task. This is a confusion I only just worked through myself so I don't expect everyone to know it. I'm trying to develop a taxonomy that helps us understand intrinsic task complexity because representative learning instruments are not specific enough on that point.