A brief overview of shat strongs concordance is about and how to use it for Bible study.
Пікірлер: 20
@rachaelb-kennedy44092 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Yvon, you have been a blessing to me in understanding BlueLetter better. Agape always.
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@Jesus-dd2zz3 жыл бұрын
God bless you for this teaching. I needed it. Thank you. 👍😀
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@chosenbyHim32 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great information.
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@MyNnavarro Жыл бұрын
Much appreciated. Thank you for the lesson. I am blessed.
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@aisatsblake12 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the tutorial. Gonna put it to use right now : )
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@GBthe1AndOnlyMuchLuv11 жыл бұрын
NIV has taken out "by prayer and fasting" but it is in the KJV. check both scriptures out online: Matthew 17:21 "Howbeit, this kind goeth not out, but by prayer and fasting." (The NIV doesn't even leave a footnote either.)
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@JeLeSi869 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video. It is super helpful!
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@steelgray7893 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video.
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@STLEO112 жыл бұрын
I don't want NIV
@accordingtothescriptures347011 ай бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@accordingtothescriptures3470 Жыл бұрын
No offense, but this is not the way that Strong’s Concordance was intended to be used. The words in the back of the concordance are *not* definitions as you stated in your video; they are *various ways that each word was translated in different contexts in the 1611 KJV.* In fact, how could Professor Strong define Greek and Hebrew words for us if could *not* read d Greek or Hebrew? Watch my video, entitled, _What's Wrong With Strong's?_ Respectfully, Angel Arellano Jr.
@GBthe1AndOnlyMuchLuv11 жыл бұрын
NIV has taken out "by prayer and fasting" but it is in the KJV. check both scriptures out online: Matthew 17:21 "Howbeit, this kind goeth not out, but by prayer and fasting." (The NIV doesn't even leave a footnote either.)