‼️ How to use the Deeper CHIRP + beam angles to find big fish? ★★★★★

How to use the Deeper CHIRP+ beam angles to find big fish? ► Take Your Free Trial - www.the-fishfi...
the deeper chirp comes with three different transmission cones or beam angles. a powerful feature that may seem confusing to some of you at first. this video is an extract from the world's first and only deeper online training course.
how to use the deeper chirp plus beam angles to find fishes. we will first do some basics on the three beam angles. so that we can use them effectively. the deeper chirp has three transmission cones that is three beam angles with seven degrees, 16 degrees and a wide one with 47 degrees.
if we compare the different angles then we notice the leap from 7 to 16 is not that large. on the other side from 16 to 47 is quite a big jump. a quick note whenever we mention predatory fish like, bass, pike or perch - of course it applies to any other predator or game fish as well.
let us take a quick look at the major differences at 3 beam angles. in this example we can only see this fish here with the narrow beam angle with the 16 degree beam angle. one more fish becomes visible. and with the 47 degree beam we can see the school of fish or school of roach.
a rather look at the wide transmission cone and beam angle in detail. with the larger transmission cone a larger area can be covered - hence more fish is visible. the more fish we can see the better. unfortunately the devil is in the details and that is what we will try to understand.
now we will use the wide beam angle and take this predator here for example. on the right side we have the depth range from 2 to 20 meters that is 7 to 66 feet on the left side.
our wide beam angle has a diameter of 1.7 meters or 5.6 feet in other words when the deeper is up here we can detect fish at a depth of 2 meters or 7 feet within a diameter of 1.7 meters or 5.6 feet.
think about it that means 6.5 meters or 22 feet from the center of the deeper towards all directions.
this is quite a large area we can cover with the deeper using the wide beam angle and it makes it possible to see clearly what is going on down there.
now one could assume that the wide beam angle is always the better option because we can see more fish. let us take this fish arch here as
Facebook: / the-fishfinders-109713...

[@450kman]

Thanks for the informative video. You saved me $300 as I was sold on purchasing a Deeper until the part about it defaulting (8:58) into shallow water mode, narrow 7*beam, for depths less than 6feet. Depths

[@BivvyLife]

A superb detailed insight into the workings of these brilliant little devices. Thank you sir.

[@DonBrydon]

This was very helpful, thank you.

[@sergeyo2264]

Very nice! Still no way to know if it's left or right (f/b) side from the center...

[@the-fishfinders1967]

yes, but if can see that if you turn the deeper a little to left or right.

[@sergeyo2264]

Ha-ha! yes! so obvious! why would this not occur to me ;-)

[@sjoervanderploeg4340]

I think Zander sounds a lot better than Pikeperch!

[@expomm]

Glad this is in english

[@SeekerofWisdom1949]

My is new deeper device showing 27 ft deep when in a pool 3 to 4 feet deep?

[@the-fishfinders1967]

if it is that shallow, the Deeper cannot show a correct depth. The path of the ping is too short ... From 2 m or 7 ft you have a good depth indication. At 3-4 ft the Deeper also makes no sense, because the transmission cone is much too narrow to indicate fish. Tight lines Martin

[@jamesdean645]

so i cant catch in a 2 meter deep water cause its too shallow for deeper to work properly

[@the-fishfinders1967]

right, The Deeper does not give a good result in too shallow shallow water (2 m / 6 ft), because then automatically the narrow beam is used.

[@kaseybuchanan3269]

@@the-fishfinders1967 what about 10-20 feet? Is this a product that is only meant for lake trout at 40 ft depth or something? I don’t understand why it would default to narrow under 15 ft depth.

[@paxmowa]

@@the-fishfinders1967 But you can disable automatic frequency adjustment for shallow water in the Deeper app.

[@griffithandy2950]

Voiceovers are video killers. I’d rather listen to your accent while you explain.

[@davidlabossiere1905]

your accent was fine, but i prefer human accents to robots

[@the-fishfinders1967]

Yeah, we understand ... if we can hire and pay a professional voice over artist we will do that later. 😎

[@cerebraltackle]

But the math doesn't add up for the entire diameter of the cone at the bottom.

[@the-fishfinders1967]

You are right. The transmission cone is also not so static, and simply stops at a diameter of 8 m, for example. It is concentrated to the center and downward and weakens outward. The meters and feet are meant to give an impression of how the cone is constructed and how it works.

[@cerebraltackle]

@@the-fishfinders1967 We worked with Deeper's team on this here recently. The math was corrected and they're thinking about adding the information in-app.

[@NIKOinIRL]

​@@cerebraltackle would love to see the search area displayed in the app

[@cerebraltackle]

@@NIKOinIRL if I can find the graph we put together, I'll get it to you. We've already given it to the folks at deeper.

[@ultraSabotaj]

@@cerebraltackle Can I have it too? Thx.

[@RajSarchimelia]

i"m tired of your weird "feet". stop using such units.

[@fischfindertest]

ok, instead ... i should use?

[@RonBarrett1954]

The plural of "fish" is "fish". There's no such word as "fishes". At least review your video headline before posting.

[@owczarb]

Hi, there is something called multiple plural and "fishes" is correct as it describes multiple groups of fish.

[@dannymaiorani519]

Incorrect. If there are 2 carp, 3 bass, and 4 salmon then there are three fishes. I lived in Germany for 3 years, they learn English from a young age, many of them speak it better than your average American can.

[@kolumbus1984]

Why do you even have to be arrogant !?! Hello there are so many countries other than Great nation off america ! Did you know that average European know about 5 languages, why do you think that English is so superior that everyone have to know it perfect! From many languages, making direct translation many times sentence does not make sense, but people try, and i think he has done a good job. And be appreciative that he does that, so many can enjoy. I dont even care grammar, i totally understood what he ment, and many will agree that he has done more than a good job.