How to Win a War

[@CovertCabal]

Download Lords Mobile here to win IPHONE 11 PROs and SAMSUNG GALAXY FOLDs: igg.com/event/giveaway

[@ryanfoley8035]

Covert Cabal yaa new vid

[@xxlookalive239x3]

Ready for the vid haha

[@Hebdomad7]

I know you need the money to keep going. But these mobile games are terrible micro-transaction fest grindy games with game mechanics that are deliberately designed to get you to spend money. Please get better sponsors.

[@gustavolemonke]

Covert Cabal Can a Northrop f5e jet from the late 50’s with a extremely skilled pilot destroy someone with little training on one of the most newest and advanced jets?

[@bhopboy2165]

Thanks for teaching me how to win a war at 1 am my cat stands no chance

[@guilhermevelhote5307]

Instructions unclear: got pushed back to Berlin

[@WetaMantis]

Rush B!

[@sidvyas8549]

😬😬😬

[@musicalneptunian]

“First restrain, next blockade, lastly destroy.” - Aron Nimzowitsch, chess master in the 1920's

[@probecteus3048]

:D

[@repdebt]

try turning it off and on again

[@alextoso100]

Just be an Italian leader, if you are on the loosing side you switch sides and automatically win

[@itsmeitsme1771]

ahhaah so true

[@ns7353]

Mark Felton tier

[@Hebdomad7]

Learn a bit more history. It was the removal of Mussolini that allowed the Italians to "switch sides". In reality they were removing a fascist dictator from their own country.

[@alextoso100]

Phill i know I was only joking not trying to offend anyone

[@mariano7699]

@@Hebdomad7 : then becomed psychopaths, homosexuals, homelessness, middle class and upper class and arrogantly ignore those ancestors ideals/sacrificed for what each sovern European nation fought

[@trooper20202]

Honestly, if you make that 10 hour video I would watch it.

[@justsomeghostwithinterneta7296]

WHERE THE HELL DO YOU NEED THAT INFORMATION?!

[@trooper20202]

So I can prepare for the world war trilogy to be completed

[@justsomeghostwithinterneta7296]

@@trooper20202 Jesus

[@Dwight511]

@@trooper20202 World War trilogy? LOL.

[@janezjonsa3165]

Hahahhahahhahahha, rofl... yep. That would trend same as lullaby. Way to go to sleep. We used to be trekkies, dreamers of better world. Now its all other psychotics prevailing... on yt

[@tylerjacobson5201]

"No war is over until the enemy says it's over. We may think it over, we may declare it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote." - Gen. Mattis

[@DemonDragonGD]

Reason why we had to use 2 nukes on one country. 1 drop We don't belive you 2nd drop Oh shi you were serious

[@JonatasAdoM]

@@DemonDragonGD US: Oh good they fell for that, those were the only 2 we had.

[@JonatasAdoM]

Hannibal 216 BC: "It's over Rome!" Napoleon 1812: "It's over Russia!" Hitler 1941: "Oh no, not again."

[@landonwood3977]

@@JonatasAdoM sooo true

[@sue08401]

LMAO - says the guy who never got closer to war than a Battalion headquaters. Hell, I did two tours in Vietnam based in a division headquaters - betting I got rocketed more than he did in his few months there.

[@Bengals6211]

"Winning" is completely dependent on victory conditions.

[@cwg9238]

this. the vietnam war was "won" by the US, if your metric is body count and overall destruction.

[@marcospedroza7184]

I think that's why you have to outline the objectives of your war, as mentioned in the video so I understand what u mean

[@Mr.Ut21]

There are two ways to win a war. 1. Acheiving unconditional surrender 2. Revenge and deterrence. Thats it.

[@Apophis40K]

@@Mr.Ut21 not at all there are nearly infint amounts. Here some examples: getting a bucket back (Honor/reputation of a Nation)(look up "war of the bucket") , expanding your teretory, to hit other nation economogly (destabelasing) , eradicate a group of people, to create puppets, to creat/aquire allays, gaining access to rare resources, gain/keep access to markets

[@HieronymousLex]

2:47 he said that

[@comradegeneralvladimirpoot1313]

_How to Win a War_ *Germany wants to know your location*

[@Sedna063]

Bring enough winter clothes and make sure you attack swiftly through the Ardennes.

[@vovochen]

Indeed.

[@YUSKHAN]

Germany lost cause Hitler broke the Nazi-soviet non aggression pact if he had listened to his generals not to, Germany would have nuked Newyork with their Amerika bombers and V rockets

[@sidvyas8549]

1000JOyo like any commie candidate

[@wessex8031]

@@YUSKHAN Too much History channel bud, you should quit that shit

[@baranyetik3085]

How to win a war with 10 steps: Step 1: Declare war Step 2: Attack Step 3: Defend Step 4: Attack Step 5: Defend Step 6: Fall back Step 7: Sign a peace treaty Step 8: Broke the treaty and declare war Step 9: Blitzkrieg and get some land Step 10: Sign a treaty again and get 1cm land.(900.000 Casualties)

[@chicuongvu1806]

Sound like a good deal to me plus inflation who cant use more money??

[@mjnoon3609]

this gets it

[@gusjeazer]

I don't know what this is referring to tbh

[@CXIEF]

Sound like what a russian dictator would do

[@Crashed131963]

THE ART OF WAR (2019 Edition Version) Sun Tzu says: "If a H-Bomb lands within 100 miles of you have a great afterlife."

[@jonathanryan9946]

That version also says, "The enemy can not push a button, if you disable their hand"

[@anthonyc4138]

@@jonathanryan9946 they can still push the button

[@anthonyc4138]

@@jonathanryan9946 example head and their elbows

[@jonathanryan9946]

@@anthonyc4138 Reference -------------- Head

[@asneecrabbier3900]

thanks sun tzu that was epic advice

[@Violent2aShadow]

How to win a war? Capture the victory points, duh.

[@LilStoops]

I thought get all cap points until tickets (timer) bleed out.

[@jacobstarr9010]

Get 25 kills without dying

[@1Learn2Swim3]

DUH 😂

[@yongli8276]

*GET THE D POINT*

[@Kayzef2003]

We've been capturing the victory points in Afghanistan for 19 years and are now negotiating our withdrawal with them.

[@musicalneptunian]

“We are fighting a war with no front lines, since the enemy hides among the people, in the jungles and mountains, and uses covertly border areas of neutral countries. One cannot measure [our] progress by lines on a map.”- General William C. Westmoreland, the commander of all U.S. military forces in Vietnam, in a speech to a joint session of Congress on April 28, 1967.

[@Rommel296]

And that's why we lost that war - you take ground and hold it.

[@thafunktapus]

@@Rommel296 imo, the press gave it back. just like Iraq.

[@bigpeenerpeen]

Rommel296 the 1973 Paris peace accord is contrary to what you said. The US won the war

[@GolddenWaffles]

Jewish Tryhard Naahh, I think he’s right.

[@1Learn2Swim3]

Huh, didn't North Vietnam sprint to the negotiating table once B-52s started bombing the shit out of Hanoi?

[@AnOriginalYouTuber]

"Never get involved in a land war in Asia."

[@SebAnders]

Unless you are... THE MONGOLS!

[@alioshax7797]

@ScarletDespair And soviets, and britishs, and frenchs... Afghanistan, Indochina, Vietnam...

[@DJSbros]

Sounds like the kind of thing Asian countries would hope becomes a common saying.

[@EpicMRPancake]

What if you are an Asian country?

[@EpicMRPancake]

@Stinger Grail Just did so, they told me shit was going breezy until they involved some Americans.

[@jcd776]

I'm a Field Marshal now. Thanks, Covert Cabal!

[@affentaktik2810]

T Tong in which army? And what branch?

[@WetaMantis]

@@affentaktik2810 Sealand. Navy

[@codyweien4513]

Heres your luger, sir. You know what to do.

[@thewarhawk8203]

@User Name *KIM JONG UN INTENSIFIES*

[@helpiamstuckonthismanshead3385]

Nice

[@rollekinnunen2623]

"Oil left the chat"

[@wawan8759]

"oil joins the war"

[@prasoonshrestha3833]

One Basic Rule of War: There is nothing such as a Fair-Fight, always take the most number of advantages u can get. And if u can't have any advantage than turn enemies "Advantage" into "Disadvantage".

[@samad934]

@Saffra Aegis and vx too.

[@dr.lyleevans6915]

Vyrex420 well, Hague, Geneva convention etc. define war crimes. Although in practice it isn’t always punished.

[@kevinc.cucumber3697]

Great saying. Kill civilians to anger the enemy, then kill them.

[@deviledegg5664]

"Civilized rules of war" has always been a joke in my opinion, not only is war cruel but its most definitely not civil. In war you seize every opportunity to destroy the enemy and eliminate their will to fight or mount effective resistance

[@user-bs5qr5ie4s]

How do you turn an enemy advantage into a disadvantage

[@elfinplatypus1341]

Finally, a youtube tutorial that I can use

[@chicuongvu1806]

ElfinPlatypus13 Finally a worthy opponent our fight will ne legendary

[@zombieaerospace5005]

U what

[@yayayayya4731]

@@zombieaerospace5005 doing a little trolling

[@MrLittlelawyer]

How to win a war in the modern world: Step 1; Set clear objectives Step 2: Accomplish those objectives. Step 3: Random people like politicians, media, and international communities redefine objectives and say you lost/haven't won yet. Defense companies profit. Step 4: ??????

[@buddymac3993]

Step four fall asleep from boredom and knowing losing was in the political cards all along

[@WR3ND]

Marmalade Parade

[@oscccar1]

How to win a war: Destroy all enemy buildings and units.

[@Luredreier]

You can do that and still lose the war.

[@DJSbros]

Thanks Rommel

[@gabenewell3955]

Luredreier unlikely

[@CallsignYukiMizuki]

You only need to destroy buildings Also fucking Terrans: Aight Im headin out

[@ironraccoon3536]

Silos needed!

[@deviledegg5664]

When I was young and first started to learn about war and military history across multiple conflicts I've always had this urge and this sense to learn as much as possible from the victories and defeats of many battles from ancient Rome to nazi Germany to the USSR, America etc. I don't know where it comes from but I feel it necessary to learn how wars are fought and more importantly how war evolves. We're a species of violent savants who excel at finding ways to kill on an industrial level, learning how we apply such horrific methods for some reason interests and captivates me. From weapons to tactics learning war in my opinion is a most useful skill.

[@youtubeviewer2381]

Yea same here. I feel like war is the pinnacle of human achievement.

[@1StepForwardToday]

I love the strategic aspects of war. Not only on the strategies commanded upon the battlefield, but also the political and psychological strategies. From the ability to inspire a nearly defeated army with belief and purpose, enough to turn the tides, to the ability to invoke fear, and doubt in ones enemy, at just the right time, and in just the right way. The brilliantly orchestrate military strategy planned and the timely synchronized execution on the battlefield, including the "on the fly", real time, reactive modifications to defend, to trick, out wit, out maneuver, or psych out to demoralize one's foe. Sometimes, they'll even spread rumors about the enemy leader, (prior to declaring war), which correspond to possible doubts already present in the minds of his enemies soldiers about their leader. Alliances, marriages, vassals, spies, secrecy, successfully sniffing out traitors, etc, etc. The bravery, the fear, pain, suffering, inspiration, doubts, resilience, sacrifice, death, and destruction. Not to mention the absolutely astonishing logistics required, (economic, morale, food, water, weather, equipment, resources, deployment, etc) in order to even get the chance to orchestrate it all, and carry out their strategic game plan. There are so many moving parts. When it's all put together, it's like a glorious artistic symphony. A masterpiece

[@egg-iu3fe]

same, war is fascinating

[@egg-iu3fe]

@@youtubeviewer2381 it is, those who builds the strongest army is the one who rules the world. All successful empires in history had the most powerful military, having a powerful military is the key to becoming a global superpower

[@GunsNGames1]

*"To win a war you must win, then you'll see you won."*

[@alecadanglao8386]

I came to see all the Generals in the comment section, I concur.

[@kzh2313]

France be like : WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN!

[@charlesuzozie5747]

*WHY IS THE PAPER WHITE?*

[@NPJGlobal]

"There were 53 major conflicts in Europe. France was a belligerent in 49 of them. In 185 battles that France had fought over the last 800 years, their armies had won 132 times, lost 43 and drawn once only 10, giving the French army the best record in Europe." -BBC History I suggest googling "List of battles involving France in modern history"

[@charlesuzozie5747]

@@NPJGlobal its a joke dude

[@Sufferingzify]

@@NPJGlobal Soyou are saying France is the greatest warmonger in Europe.

[@jagannathbarman6712]

France wrote the paper...they are the country with the highest number of battles won in modern history

[@смиренный-х2б]

Next video idea: How not to win a war

[@sidvyas8549]

David Alexandrovitch fight on two fronts 😭😭✌️

[@alexiscambridge4492]

Don’t invade Iraq so you dont spend 16 years there. Isis is still technically there even though most of them are dead or captured

[@DJSbros]

Breed children who deny biological sex exists.

[@Lalox16x]

Don’t go invade Russia in the winter

[@jolez_4869]

How to win a not war

[@fliteshare]

He who is capable of establishing a PEACE after the fighting has ended is genuinely "victorious". All others do not understand the realities of war.

[@marrqi7wini54]

Yeah, you can destroy the entire government's ability to wage war against you, but if you don't know how to keep the peace, (Or kill off/ enslave so many people the nation you fought against basically no longer exist. Or use heavy indoctrination so the desire to raise arms against you does not exist anymore.) the first war won could become a second future war in years or even decades or an insurgency that will never end. Also you need to make sure your other rivals do not get involved. Otherwise, THEY will help build up the people you just crushed and use them as a proxy enemy against you.

[@shahabmos5130]

"just do it ." shia labeuf or adolf hitler, i'm not good with names.

[@swift7493]

Mach es einfach.

[@rageagaintstheNWO]

@17ll3 x214 But only on has the mustache.

[@kakerake6018]

"this is going to be about strategy" *Proceeds to talk about tactics

[@couldbeanybody2508]

I cannot comprehend how someone's brain can be so miniscule as to post this

[@kakerake6018]

@@couldbeanybody2508 don't insult me and explain yourself if you're so sure.

[@couldbeanybody2508]

@@kakerake6018 tell me what the difference between strategy and tactics is in this context (a military one)

[@GunsNGames1]

@@couldbeanybody2508 strategy = planning Tactics = actions.

[@couldbeanybody2508]

@@GunsNGames1 definition of strategy "a *plan* or action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim" so in this context I am correct

[@hansolo1935]

How to win a war: don't start one!

[@oscarrhoades3412]

I think it has really just come down to who has the most advanced technology. An order to have better tech, it comes down to money and highly trained military engineers.

[@blaircolquhoun7780]

You learn more from failure than you do from success. The late Tom Clancy had a book on leadership in the First Gulf War. It's called Into the Storm. It's a good book and had an introduction written by General Fred Franks.

[@xxlookalive239x3]

I been waiting for a vid for a while now this channel always goes in depth, much love to everyone.

[@FUnzzies1]

His recent videos have been pretty low effort

[@xxlookalive239x3]

@@FUnzzies1 dont watch then kid

[@FUnzzies1]

@@xxlookalive239x3 having a few lazy videos == don't watch ever again. Solid reasoning son.

[@ShahjahanMasood]

@@FUnzzies1 I think it was David Fletcher in his worst 5 tanks video that said "If you don't like something; keep it to yourself". It is pretty solid advise. Stops you from acting childish Ps. I do agree with you so don't take this as some sort of insult

[@xxlookalive239x3]

@@FUnzzies1 ok?

[@ReveredDead]

Morale...morale and the will to fight. If you can break the enemies will to fight and evaporate their morale. They will quickly fall to an enemy force.

[@festealth]

"A true victory is when you make your enemies realize that it was wrong for them to oppose you in the first place..." - Gul Dukat

[@deviledegg5664]

"I fear that we have awakened a sleeping giant"- Yamamoto. In my opinion this quote and yours perfectly complement each other.

[@Padtedesco]

Amazing the fact that you used so many Brazilian military images. They are the perfect example of a military who can be easily overcome by foreigns without waging a war.

[@flaviusjustinianus]

How to win a war: intelligence, precision, logistics.

[@DinoNucci]

Book on Lessons Learned from Iraq War - Lesson 1: don't go to war with Iraq.

[@TheWorldEnd2]

Or you know... dont go to war. Because there is never a material benefit in going to war. Political though... very much

[@ns7353]

Why? So nice we did it twice

[@TheWorldEnd2]

@@QualityPen wars are NEVER profitable in the sense that you are always losing material, time and lives. I'd say the most profitable form of combat is to not fire a single bullet. No lives lost, no material spent, no need for reconstruction. Ironic, isnt it. Combat is always done for political or for short sighted gains.

[@asneecrabbier3900]

lesson 2: if you're germany, do not try to fight every fucking country in the world

[@guardsmanom134]

Lesson 3: never invade America for the same reasons that you don't go to war with Iraq- even two year old's can pull a trigger.

[@dipshiit7]

At 3:49 Captain Pham, my former company commander. Great Marine

[@Astrocat-od5cy]

I think your point about flexibility is not thought of very much, but is incredibly important. The strongest human doesn't survive. The one that adapts does.

[@76456]

"Capturing an army our city intact, is better than destroying it all" -Sun Tzu

[@Desire123ification]

Not starting a war is the best way to win. Nowadays most countries are trying to avoid conflicts and by the same token many nations are arming themselves accordingly.

[@Alvi410]

So. . . you dont simply move a unit to capture their capital/hq/flag?

[@anthonyc4138]

@@QualityPen lol

[@KAKADOUJACK]

When stating "the largest army is useless if you can't get them food and ammunition" you showed an MRE and no extra boxes of crayons. 0/10 for accuracy.

[@hemidas]

"The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over either Eurasia or East Asia, but to keep the very structure of society intact." George Orwell, 1984.

[@wawan8759]

That's on the 1984's war merhods though

[@1StepForwardToday]

I love the strategic aspects of war. Not only on the strategies commanded upon the battlefield, but also the political and psychological strategies. From the ability to inspire a nearly defeated army with belief and purpose, enough to turn the tides, to the ability to invoke fear, and doubt in ones enemy, at just the right time, and in just the right way. The brilliantly orchestrate military strategy planned and the timely synchronized execution on the battlefield, including the "on the fly", real time, reactive modifications to defend, to trick, out wit, out maneuver, or psych out to demoralize one's foe. Sometimes, they'll even spread rumors about the enemy leader, (prior to declaring war), which correspond to possible doubts already present in the minds of his enemies soldiers about their leader. Alliances, marriages, vassals, spies, secrecy, successfully sniffing out traitors, etc, etc. The bravery, the fear, pain, suffering, inspiration, doubts, resilience, sacrifice, death, and destruction. Not to mention the absolutely astonishing logistics required, (economic, morale, food, water, weather, equipment, resources, deployment, etc) in order to even get the chance to orchestrate it all, and carry out their strategic game plan. There are so many moving parts. When it's all put together, it's like a glorious artistic symphony. A masterpiece

[@fk319fk]

You bearly touched upon an important point. Winning a war is actually easy for a much strong force going against a weaker force. The problem, and expensive part, is what happens after the war. When destroying the infrastructure, this will need to be rebuilt after the war. When the head of state is the military leader, the religious leader, and political leader, removing them creates a power vacuum. (There are so many examples, but I am trying to limit to 10 lines and not 10 chapters.)

[@deltawhisky5977]

Wars are won before they begin. Unfortunate but true.

[@ryannichols8315]

I studied alot battles of ww2. It's amazing how little things, sometimes just luck, good or bad, changes the war drastically. Hitler was sleeping on D Day. And he was in control the panzer divisions. Orders were to not wake him. Who knows what may have changed if Hitler was awake and sent his tanks immediately.

[@ryankruchowski1951]

technology will change but the war will always be the same.

[@armija]

My opinion about subject is as follows: First of all, always try to avoid war at all costs, but if it is not avoidable do the following. Try to keep war as short as possible even if that means to limit your objectives. Try to deal maximum damage in shortest amount of time. Fight on enemies territory and avoid your own. Limit your objectives to only practically achievable ones. Do not conquer land or go in to control large population centers with hostile population. Do not try to destroy enemy completely, aim at damaging them hard enough and let "gravity" do the rest. Whenever possible and as much as possible use proxies and not your own forces.

[@johannjohann6523]

"You don't win a war dying for your country. You win by making the other guy - die for his." Tsung Tsue. lol (actually, not sure who came up with the phrase. But I keep that in mind at all times. Because a trained soldier is your greatest battlefield asset. "Trained" being the operative word. From pilots to infantry).

[@leons.kennedy6710]

"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

[@supratiksaha2001]

Depending upon the country's size, power and resources war tactics may be different. For example Nazi Germany defeated France, Belgium, Netherlands, Poland with their "Blitzkrieg" techniques and got unbelievable success in conquering Soviet union at the initial stages but later Soviets not only defended their country successfully but invaded the Germany and captured Berlin also. So I think only army generals know the answer to the question " How to win a war?" and that answers differs greatly with respect to the conditions.

[@curious_one1156]

Even they dont know all the time.

[@1creeperbomb]

Nice video! Never change the music, it's way too good

[@noway57]

Better than butt sex

[@mustang5132]

I think this should become a series. This felt more like an introduction than a whole video

[@Crashed131963]

War is about attrition not skill it's just math . If the other side can build more quicker they will win. Example.) It did not matter if 1 German Tiger tank can kill 5 enemy tanks as long as the enemy built 6 tanks for every 1 tiger tank.

[@Alexx120493]

I think that the most recent asymetric wars show that our rules of engagement (some written more than 100 years ago) are preventing modern armies from winning these wars.

[@Crashed131963]

A Conflict and a War are not the same. In a war the US has women building tanks ships and Jets in factories that once made ,car and washer and dryers .Public traffic has stopped because all fuel goes to the war effort not cars. You can not buy a Iphone because Apple makes Apple grenades now. In a Conflict like Vietnam , Afghanistan and Iraq , people go about their lives wondering when the PS5 or Iphone 12 will come out.

[@vlad-ns6yt]

Putin: *furiously takes notes*

[@davids5956]

1. Define what winning consists of. 2. Don’t pick the wrong enemy or the wrong allies. 3. Go all in and direct all resources toward the war.

[@Ks3N]

How to win a war? "See that big red button" "push that"

[@kingmosesix432]

Thnx for the tutorial... I really needed it... as i am about to start one...just got rejected from art school

[@смиренный-х2б]

Finally a CC video. I can rest now.

[@ChiccinTendies]

Hard of hearing?

[@смиренный-х2б]

@@ChiccinTendies whatchu talkin bout

[@ChiccinTendies]

@@смиренный-х2б Lmao I thought you meant closed captions, not Covert Cabal. Nevermind.

[@смиренный-х2б]

@@ChiccinTendies lmao

[@peterbc6129]

If we look at a few modern wars, we see why they were successful or not. Gulf War: The objective was always to force Sadam to leave Kuwait. But some people wanted to kill him and demilitarized/puppet Iraq under the US or another power. Bush Snr was smart here, because he knew that they had no one to replace him, a power vacuum would open and the situation would get worse. So he left the military and government intact, just forced them to leave. Iraq: The objective was to remove Sadam and find his WMDs (which I still doubt to this day ever existed). The issue was, they had no one to replace Sadam and hadn't thought through what the aftermath would be. Hence the rise of ISIS, the war they continue to fight now, etc. Although militarily a victory, the war isn't over nor was it won. Korean War: The objective was to push back North Korea over the border and force them to surrender. This changed early on to removing North Korea and unification under MacArthur. This war stalemated, because they dragged in China, instead of just forcing North Korea to surrender or starving them out. East Timor: The East Timor Crisis was a very small war, but a good example of a war done well. The objective was to end the Crisis and allow East Timor independence. They defeated the Pro-Indonesian forces and then did what they needed to do: Ensure the situation was stable. Unlike the initial Iraq pull out by Obama, Australia didn't leave East Timor until they were certain the country could look after itself and the fighting was at a level the local forces could deal with. In Iraq, they left a poorly trained, but well equipped military behind that couldn't handle ISIS.

[@guardsmanom134]

THE MOST PERTAINENT QUESTION: *When was WAR, **_EVER_** , cheap?*

[@csbened16]

War was never cheap, but for long time in history was rewarding. Instead of making your own things, you just take from others, who while bussy makeing those things can not prepare to fight so much as you.

[@captinobvious4705]

You forgot the most important bit: They enemy gets a say in ending the war; no war can be over without convincing the enemy to stop fighting, the get a say in too...

[@AbcdEfgh-sq2tf]

Unless you wipe out your enemy to dust that is...

[@captinobvious4705]

@@AbcdEfgh-sq2tf which is far less practical, but yeah, that could also work

[@MartijnMols]

_'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.'_ Hitler vows to not make the same mistake as Napoleon and ends up making the same mistake... Russian winter was not the only factor in Operation Barbarossa's failure

[@saminyead1233]

They should've just focused on the South and get the oil. That would have given Germans a better chance.

[@masterafricankingofjamenos1645]

@@saminyead1233 yeah and rothschilds money

[@saminyead1233]

@@masterafricankingofjamenos1645 And that too yes. XD

[@jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868]

most vital point is to win the moral victory from the perspective of neutrals - or else you are just the villain in the next war

[@vasilzahariev5741]

Oh, that's easy. You spawn peek everyone on the enemy team. If you have somehow failed to do this and they've planted the defuser you have to make sure you have enough time to counter-defuse after you brutally murder every last one of them. Or this was a Rainbow 6 Siege match? Either way, kill everyone it usually works out.

[@a1phamalestud]

Well played but if a will Monty appears game over

[@asneecrabbier3900]

fuck you spawn peeking jäger

[@piganagun9069]

what if, two people both watch this video then go to war? the paradox.

[@shivalibhatnagar]

How to win a war hmmmm FRANCE WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

[@geomarcondino2245]

you don't win you survive -Gumball Waterson

[@Hebdomad7]

How to win a war. Remove your enemies will to fight.

[@sebastianguerraty6413]

one does not win a war, one simply loses less

[@crow9149]

Will come in useful later, thanks.

[@sonaldosui8154]

If war is that easy, every country win

[@Agent_Sparkle]

Please make the 10 hour breakdown video!!!

[@emilv.3693]

A comprehensive 10 hour video about war would require both Sun-Tzu and Bismarck coming back to life and then collaborating on the project...

[@searsa7190]

One of the best neutral channels i have ever seen...keep up the good work 👍🏼

[@SectorSos]

Thus we may know that there are five essentials for victory: 1 He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight. 2 He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces. 3 He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks. 4 He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared. 5 He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign. -Sun Tzu "The Art of War"

[@simpleandawesomeanime3220]

Me before: This looks interesting Me after: *WORLD DOMINATION*

[@vortexpb3808]

You should do a video on when war is “Necessary”

[@car_rar]

When you realise that this applies in every situation in life

[@dankuchar6821]

Nobody wins a war. One side just loses less than the other. Everybody loses in a war!

[@lizadonrex]

Please talk about China Unrestricted warfare.

[@syazwanshapii9221]

Winning heart and mind of enemy is much more better than winning a war.

[@mammouthlafouinne3678]

Not start one in the first place. A defensive war is more likely to be won whatever the odds are.

[@jakmachine9279]

Very thorough and comprehensive! 👍

[@mikaxms]

Why does the US feel like they should be the police of the world? Could you do a video on that topic.

[@joeblowme5427]

THIS IS A MILITARY CHANNEL NOT A POLITICAL ONE.

[@mikaxms]

@@joeblowme5427 Warfare is a political tool. How this relation influences warfare should be discussed.

[@joeblowme5427]

@@mikaxms , YEAH WELL THIS CHANNEL TOUCHES ON THE MILITARY SIDE OF WARFARE AND STAY AWAY FROM THE POLITICAL SIDE OF IT . IT'S BETTER THAT WAY. YOU ARE JUST TRYING TO STIR RESPONSES UNRELATED TO WEAPONS AND/OR TACTICS

[@kurousagi8155]

Logistically, your idea is fantastic. A video on why the USA is the world’s policeman and why other nations aren’t (or which nations could conceivably replace the USA) is a interesting idea.

[@shridhar9094]

Finally the information i needed

[@Donuthan]

Would you like to know more?

[@DamianOchramowicz]

*Covert Cabal:* In order to win a war, you need to define your objectives/goals *War on terror and war on drugs:* WELL ACKCHYUALLY...

[@samuelsammington3572]

How to win a war: redefine your terms and objectives War won.

[@buddymac3993]

Too bad the american politions caved in all wars since ww2,and did not follow your advice.maybe they would have followed your advice if only those damn siutcases full of money did not get in the way of objective of first winning the warn Iraq and Afghanistan

[@seapickle4119]

Thanks bro i realky needed this

[@krisfrederick5001]

Next, "How to win the peace". We've gotten incredibly skilled at blowing shit up, but not so much how to completely win. Just a thought, Godspeed. note: (I wrote that before this began).

[@neeneko]

Unfortunately, winning the peace isn't very exciting, and thus does not get the same kinds of resources. Even worse, it messes with the worldview of the people who tend to push for war in the first place, so trying to win the peace makes you a political enemy of the people who take credit for winning the war.

[@fakecubed]

Winning the peace means having the willingness before you go to war to actually win it, and not get squeamish about what must be done. We could win the war in Afghanistan in a week, and make that country peaceful for a thousand years, but does anyone in Washington, D.C. have the stomach to do so? We were able to win so decisively in Syria because there were no CNN reporters spreading demoralizing reports to the American people and asking uncomfortable questions of politicians. Soldiers aren't peacekeepers, they're warfighters. Let them off their political leash, keep the un-American press out of the theater, and we'll see plenty of decisive victories again everywhere, for far cheaper, and it will discourage future wars by making everyone too scared of war to wage it again. Making distinctions between enemy fighters and the populations that harbor them and being concerned about collateral damage only stretches wars out for many years and results in far more civilian deaths in the long run.

[@krisfrederick5001]

@@neeneko True story

[@Padtedesco]

@Juan Sanchez WE? You mean Soviets, right? Anyway. Plan Marshall

[@1pcfred]

@Juan Sanchez when Japan surrendered they still had over 4 million men at arms in the field. So they had plenty of fight left in them. In fact they kept fighting the Soviets for 3 weeks after they surrendered. The Soviets kept on attacking them. The last Japanese soldier finally surrendered in 1974 almost 30 years after the war was over.

[@fbomb3035]

Make internal war then come as the savior

[@bobjohn2000]

I was getting worried about my favorite channel

[@PlanetGoddess]

idk where it starts exactly cos I just got the idea when the example ended. It's also fictional but whatever. The lack of effective screening and formation explained around 6:40 to 7:30 -ish is exactly why the Battle of D'qar left the Resistance so dead in the water. They, obviously, had more than enough firepower. The T wings are immensely overpowered offensively speaking, but they couldn't jam enemy defenses, screen fighters, have an effective plan or various other micro-tactical positions. Maybe its the writer and SW nerd in me but that part just connected some dots for me.

[@winstonjones7912]

What is your background? How do you know all this stuff?

[@MartijnMols]

I was wondering the same thing. This guy knows a lot. Probably because he reads lots of books on warfare.

[@Lizardman9808]

NSA spy

[@winstonjones7912]

@@MartijnMols He's probably a military officer or something in national security.

[@Viguier89]

If you like military stuff you can find a lot of information. I have writen a 50 pages thesis on the military industrial complex of the European Union. To do so i read a lot of books and scientific articles on many subjects. There are nice books just like Sun Tzu by Kevin Alexander or Counterinsurgency Warfare by David Galula.

[@faranahmad943]

Dark web

[@EVISYR]

the answer is quite simple: don't do it how the russians tried it

[@TrueChell]

First you need to disconnect people (Politicians etc.), who have absolutely no idea what they are involved with, from war as much as possible. Iraq & Afghanistan are both huge political failures. And in all of "Blufor" the politics played by their governments have costed at least hundreds of soldier's lives.

[@MayankPrasad111]

Never leave a single enemy alive

[@MayankPrasad111]

@tarn zing that's why never differentiate between soldiers & non-combatants, sterilize the nation.

[@thickboi4304]

How to win a war Step 1 : switch sides (🇮🇹)

[@apollo1694]

Italy never switched sides on either World War. Their participation in the Entente during WW1 was legal, as the Central Powers was never a mutual defense pact or alliance. They "switched sides" in WW2 after a revolution that ended the original government led by Mussolini