"How to win debates without really making arguments: An Introduction to Framing" with Adam Hawksbee

[@nintendo2000]

Summary: 1. Arguments are based on truth and relevancy. Relevancy is based on the context of arguments. Therefore taking time to frame the context makes the argument a lot more persuasive. 2. The context is up for grabs -- there is no clear context in which debates exist. 3. Good POIs take framing into account, because in the short amount of time you can launch a POI, it's easier to disprove an argument's relevancy than to disprove its truth. 4. Judges love clear contributions.

[@thomasm.creamer2728]

0:43 - Introduction. 6:09 - Example 1 - This House Would Create Schools for LGBT individuals 9:40 - Example 2 - This House Would Criminalise the paying of ransoms. 16:26 - Example 3 - This House Would Ban media coverage of school shootings. 23:53 - Advice on POIs 26:15 - Advice on Right-wing take on Welfare debates 30:35 - Framing practice with motion "THW only give development aid to countries that introduce a minimum wage for workers"

[@muhammadAwijaya]

thanks ya

[@chaniduratnayake4287]

thanks Creamer

[@wilsonha148]

You explained what our teacher did for one week in 40 minutes and the best I part, i understood yours better

[@koitsuga]

Generally speaking, students understand something better the second time it's explained to them. Not to say that this isn't a great talk, but just that even if your teacher's explanation was shit, the fact you got thinking about it beforehand inherently makes the explanation easier to get to grips with, and this effect means that the second quick explanation you get about something always sounds smarter and easier to understand even if the first explanation actually did all the legwork.

[@nathanielfleku3416]

​@@koitsugathis makes sense. Should apply it to my academics 😅.

[@pauls7056]

My word - so much sense from someone so young. This chap really knows his stuff and is so articulate. He should be framing the Education syllabus so that we can have articulate, persuasive youngsters leaving schools and universities.

[@divejrana886]

The aspect of truth and relevancy was marvelous. Thanks a tonne for the ideas!

[@Laurellien]

I suddenly understand why every speech at this IV started with framing the issue.

[@adeelali8417]

My goodness. This is some powerful stuff. Frame exists all around us, it is then the context under which we operate.

[@Caring.for.Couples]

Super helpful, thank you so much!

[@ManchesterDebatingUnion]

Glad it was helpful!

[@diaegon]

took him 1 and half minute to take out the hand from the pocket...

[@anngel11]

someone was coughing so bad lol. i learned a lot thank you

[@Caring.for.Couples]

I'd love more tips like this! Have anymore?

[@ManchesterDebatingUnion]

We have more workshops on our KZbin channel!

[@reginaluciamadelinebangun4662]

Is framing the same as setting the goals?

[@HenriqueLemesJuxd]

Hi guys! I would like to know if you could open this video for translation. I'm from Brazil and I believe there are lots of people here in my country that would enjoy this video but don't know english. (I candidate myself for translation haha)

[@ManchesterDebatingUnion]

Unfortunately KZbin no longer allows community subtitles :(

[@MrSendaikenpo]

@@ManchesterDebatingUnion kzbin.info/www/bejne/d5XChXihbpl1b7M It seems you can add subtitles (June 2022). Good luck

[@latiflawrencejorhowie92]

I still don't get the opposition frame of the opposition on the second motion, THW criminalize paying of ransom. Can I get a clearer explanation?

[@RebelHair]

the guys hot

[@hp5732]

"How to win debates without really making arguments" - be white and from an EPL institution.

[@ryanrayner610]

KIM, you also need to point out your opponent's bullshit framing, I adj a debate for "THW Build a wall over the border", Gov literally framed the wall as an "imaginative wall" and is purely metaphorical, OPP never pointed it out and flew with it

[@орунемогу-ь5м]

for 9:36 seconds i have understand that i should describe a problem that potentially exists making OO arguments look poor right? Jzz kinda hard

[@cynthiaadhiambo3226]

I can barely concentrate on what he's saying with his hand in the pocket and his hand directed to his mouth every time

[@teebee1204]

Unfortunately, I can barely understand him. He talks too fast and his accent is strong.I'm not sure if it's worth watching when I can only understand 2/3 of the words in a sentence,

[@nathanjunzhao]

Slow down the video through settings and recognize that the audio quality itself is quite poor. He does not speak too fast and even if he did you should learn from him when he is a wildly successful university-level debater. As for his accent, that is simply his accent and to say the video is probably not worth watching because of his accent is a problematic claim.

[@ShuffleboardJerk]

competitive debate is meaningless

[@Isa-vy2bv]

I actually agree

[@jolene_ren]

so true

[@kdramaloverboy6223]

Its pretty cool

[@ShuffleboardJerk]

@@kdramaloverboy6223 I have nothing against those that enjoy it, but you have to admit that it doesn’t actually DO anything. It is all a performance as opposed to getting to the actual truth of a matter.

[@a.a9021]

@@ShuffleboardJerk Yep. The whole concept of framing as presented here is basically about choosing the problem that would make your solution most relevant, rather than determining what the most likely problem actually is and then choosing your solution based on that. Basically the opposite of how science works. At the very least, it's useful for seeing how dishonest arguments operate.